Wednesday, January 19, 2022

Israeli police demolish Palestinian family's home after lengthy standoff

JERUSALEM — Israeli police demolished a Palestinian family's East Jerusalem home Wednesday after a high-profile standoff which saw family members take to the roof in protest.

An "eviction order of illegal buildings" was carried out in the Sheikh Jarrah neighborhood, Israel Police said in a statement, adding that the land will be used to build a school for children with special needs.

The family's lawyer said that the demolition was illegal.

Mahmoud Salhiyeh, 50, who lived in the house with his wife and children, alongside a another house where his sister and her five children lived, took to the roof Monday and was threatening to burn the house down by igniting a gas canister, rather than hand it over to the authorities.

Image: CORRECTION-PALESTINIAN-ISRAEL-CONFLICT-JERUSALEM (Ahmad Gharabli / AFP - Getty Images)
Image: CORRECTION-PALESTINIAN-ISRAEL-CONFLICT-JERUSALEM (Ahmad Gharabli / AFP - Getty Images)

"I will blow myself up, with the house, with the children, with everything," he told NBC News by phone as he stood on the roof with others Monday. He eventually came down.

An excavator came to raze the property to the ground early Wednesday. NBC News saw personal items such as children's books and school bags, family photos, clothes and shoes strewn in the rubble. Israel security forces at the scene prevented the family from retrieving anything.

Police said the eviction was been approved by multiple courts, including the Jerusalem District Court, and that the order was first issued in 2017.

"Members of the family living in the illegal buildings were given countless opportunities to hand over the land with consent, but unfortunately they refused to do so, even after meetings and repeated dialogue attempts by the Jerusalem municipality," a police spokesperson said in a statement.

Download the NBC News app for breaking news and politics

The Municipality of Jerusalem says 18 classrooms, 6 kindergartens, sports fields and leisure facilities are set to be built on the land and that the school will be open to local Arab community. The authority accused the family of building illegally on the land.

Image: PALESTINIAN-ISRAEL-CONFLICT-JERUSALEM (Ahmad Gharabli / AFP - Getty Images)
Image: PALESTINIAN-ISRAEL-CONFLICT-JERUSALEM (Ahmad Gharabli / AFP - Getty Images)

However, Waleed Abu Tayeh, the Salhiyah family's lawyer, said the order was unlawful and went beyond what had been agreed in court.

"Mahmood was willing to evict his home, but they demolished his house even though they have an eviction order, not a demolition one. This is illegal," he said in a statement Wednesday.

Tayeh also said that the authorities demolished Mahmoud Salhiyeh's sister's house, which was not covered by the order.

However, Fleur Hassan Nahoum, the deputy mayor of Jerusalem, said the order was for both eviction and demolition. She added the police action on Salhiyeh’s sister's house was consistent with the court's order.

NBC News has contacted Israel Police and the Jerusalem Municipality about these claims.

Image: CORRECTION-PALESTINIAN-ISRAEL-CONFLICT-JERUSALEM (Menahem Kahana / AFP - Getty Images)
Image: CORRECTION-PALESTINIAN-ISRAEL-CONFLICT-JERUSALEM (Menahem Kahana / AFP - Getty Images)

Dozens of longtime Palestinian residents in Sheikh Jarrah are battling efforts by Jewish settlers to evict them from their homes in an area that has been a frequent site of unrest in recent years.

That case, which has been in Israel’s Supreme Court for months, has drawn global attention and fueled last year’s Israeli-Palestinian violence.

The Salhiyah family say they purchased the property before 1967, when Israel captured east Jerusalem, while the state has argued in court that the family does not have rights to the property.

Israel captured east Jerusalem, along with the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, in the 1967 Mideast war. It later annexed the eastern half of the city — home to most of Jerusalem’s Palestinian population — in a move unrecognized by most of the international community. The Palestinians seek east Jerusalem as the capital of a future state.

Lawahez Jabari reported from Jerusalem and Patrick Smith from London.


Israel police demolish Palestinian home in east Jerusalem eviction



Israeli police demolished the home of a Palestinian family and arrested at least 18 people as they carried out a controversial eviction order in the sensitive east Jerusalem neighbourhood of Sheikh Jarrah early Wednesday.
 
© Menahem KAHANA A Palestinian surveys what remains of the Salhiya family home in Israeli-annexed east Jerusaalem after its demolition by Israeli police

The looming eviction of other families from Sheikh Jarrah in May last year fuelled an 11-day war between Israel and armed Palestinian factions in Gaza.

Before dawn, Israeli officers went to the home of the Salhiya family, who were first served with an eviction notice in 2017.

Jerusalem authorities have said the land will be used to build a school for children with special needs, but the eviction is likely to raise tension in a neighbourhood that has become a symbol of Palestinian opposition to Israeli occupation. 
© Menahem KAHANA Israeli police lead away a Palestinian on crutches during the eviction and demolition operation in east Jerusalem's sensitive Sheikh Jarrah neighbourhood

Jerusalem deputy mayor Fleur Hassan-Nahoum has said the dispute surrounding the Salhiya home is "totally different" from the events in May, when Palestinians risked being forced to hand over plots of land to Jewish settlers.

Israeli police said they had "completed the execution of an eviction order of illegal buildings built on grounds designated for a school for children with special needs".

"Members of the family living in the illegal buildings were given countless opportunities to hand over the land with consent," a police statement said.

A bulldozer raked through rubble hours after the home was destroyed.

A police spokesman told AFP 18 family members and supporters were arrested for "violating a court order, violent fortification and disturbing public order," but no clashes took place during the eviction.

When police arrived to carry out the order on Monday, Salhiya family members went up to the building's roof with gas canisters, threatening to set the contents and themselves alight if they were forced out of their home.

Police had eventually backed off, but returned early Wednesday amid heavy rainfall in Jerusalem.

Salhiya family lawyer Walid Abu-Tayeh told AFP police had arrested 20 people during the operation, six of them Israeli citizens, with the latter being released, adding that "the Arab detainees were assaulted."

He also confirmed reports that the Palestinian father Mahmud Salhiya is married to an Israeli Jew, named Meital.

In an audio recording distributed to local Arab-language media, Meital, who speaks Arabic, said the family was woken early Wednesday by the sound of loud booms and police had cut the electricity.

"They took me out of the house with my daughter and children who were crying and arrested my husband and all the young men," she said.

- 'Two-time refugees' -

Deputy mayor Hassan-Nahoum said Tuesday the plot that the Salhiya family claim as theirs belonged to private Palestinian owners who then sold it to the city, which allocated it for classrooms for special needs Palestinian children.

A delegation of European diplomats visited the site during the standoff. "In occupied territory, evictions are a violation of international humanitarian law," the head of the European Union's mission to the Palestinian territories, Sven Kuehn von Burgsdorff, told AFP.

Human Rights Watch Israel and Palestine director Omar Shakir called the eviction "cruel" and stressed that the Salhiya family had previously been forced from their west Jerusalem home during Israel's creation in 1948.

Wednesday's eviction made them "two-time refugees", he said.

Hundreds of Palestinians face eviction from homes in Sheikh Jarrah and other east Jerusalem neighbourhoods. Circumstances surrounding the eviction threats vary.

In some cases, Jewish Israelis have lodged legal claims to plots they say were illegally taken during the war that accompanied Israel's creation in 1948.

Israeli law allows Jewish Israelis to file such claims, but no equivalent law exists for Palestinians who lost land during the conflict.

Palestinians facing eviction say their homes were legally purchased from Jordanian authorities who controlled east Jerusalem between 1948 and 1967.

Israel captured east Jerusalem in the Six-Day War of 1967 and later annexed it in a move not recognised by the international community.

More than 200,000 Jewish settlers have since moved into the city's eastern sector, fuelling tensions with Palestinians, who claim it as the capital of their future state.

mk-jjm/bs/kir
AFP

Israel dispossesses Palestinians from their home so that it can build them a school

Israel gets away with whatever ethnic cleansing it can get away with until the resistance becomes too loud. They it delays and uses other methods towards the same end.


BY JONATHAN OFIR 
MONDOWEISS
JANUARY 18, 2022
OMER BAR-LEV, ISRAEL’S MINISTER FOR PUBLIC SECURITY, VISITS A BORDER POLICE TRAINING FACILITY THAT INCLUDES A MOCKUP OF A PALESTINIAN URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD. FROM BAR-LEV VIDEO POSTED JANUARY 7, 2022. SCREENSHOT.

Yesterday’s much-publicized standoff in the east-Jerusalem neighborhood of Sheikh Jarrah was yet another eviction attempt. Mahmoud Salhiya and members of his family stood on the roof with gas canisters, threatening to blow the place up if their forcible removal was carried out.

For now, the move has been temporarily averted. As the Jerusalem municipality said:

In coordination with the Israel Police, it was decided to postpone the eviction with the goal of allowing the Salahiya family to move out on their own.

Once again, the world was watching (although the international community once again seemed to be incapacitated, reduced to “bearing witness”). The British Consulate in East Jerusalem tweeted that Consul-General Diane Corner, whose office is located just opposite the Salhiya home, had joined other diplomats to “bear witness to the ongoing eviction”, as reported by Reuters. The consulate said that such evictions in occupied territory, in all but the most exceptional circumstances, were against international humanitarian law, and urged the Israeli government to “cease such practices which only serve to increase tensions on the ground”.

This follows a familiar pattern: Israel gets away with whatever ethnic cleansing it can get away with, until the resistance, international critique or condemnation become loud enough for it to delay and use other methods towards the same end.

But this eviction is actually different. While the many other evictions in Sheikh Jarrah are done by settler organizations which claim “Jewish ownership” of lands from before 1948 (a privilege which Palestinians are not afforded), this eviction is based on the pretext of the municipality having to build educational facilities at that location. The plot where the Salhiya house is located is being claimed by Israel as “absentee property” for public use.

As Oren Ziv and Yuval Abrahami report in +972 Magazine, there is are other public plots– but Jews get priority!

[T]here are alternative locations for the establishment of educational institutions in the neighborhood, which do not involve the eviction of Palestinian families. There is, for example, an empty lot on nearby Pierre Van Paassen Street, which is set out in the masterplan as being for public buildings. However, in an unusual move, the municipality decided to give up this land and hand it over, without compensation, to the ultra-Orthodox organization Ohr Somayach, which plans to establish a yeshiva and dormitories for students.

The gushing goodwill that is afforded Jewish settlers by the Jewish State is just not there for Palestinians.

That cynical policy was coupled by one of the most cynical tweets that could be imagined, by the Laborite Israeli Internal Security Minister Omer Bar-Lev. He said that Palestinians can’t both demand education and not expect to be dispossessed:


You can’t hold the stick at both ends by both demanding that the [Jerusalem] municipality take action on welfare for Arab residents and oppose the building of educational establishments for their welfare

For those who feel foreign to the idiom of the stick, it’s akin to saying “have their cake and eat it”. It’s not just misleading. It’s malicious.

Mahmoud Salhiya spoke truth from his rooftop:

They can build five schools here and my house will remain.

Salhiya shouts it from the rooftops, but Bar-Lev (which in Hebrew means “has a heart”) is not only deaf, but also heartless. Even though he’s a Laborite (and supposedly on the left side of Israeli politics). Well of course they can build five, ten and twenty schools without dispossessing Palestinians. But that was never really the point. The point is Judaization of Palestinian lands.

“This is a particularly cynical act by the municipality”, said Aviv Tatarsky, a researcher at the NGO Ir Amim (cited by +972). He continued:

The municipality is threatening to evacuate the Salhiyeh family, while at the same time giving up another plot of land and gifting it to a yeshiva. The municipality is succeeding in making even the obligation to provide education to the Palestinian population into part of the mechanism of dispossession and Judaization.

Haaretz journalist Nir Hasson says he cannot remember any other case in which a family was evicted for the purpose of building a school (thread here), though Israel has been dispossessing Palestinians for all kinds of pretexts. Recently, the standoffs in the Naqab (Negev) have been about Israel’s parastatal organ Jewish National Fund planting forests on Bedouin farmlands.

Now they are using schools as pretext for dispossession. And if you want to both have a home and a school, then tough luck, you should be so happy with just one of the two, because if you want both, you’re just trying to “hold the stick at both ends”, like the Laborite minister says.

Israel condemned for eviction of Palestinian family in Sheikh Jarrah

January 18, 2022 

A view of the demolition site in the Sheikh Jarrah neighborhood in Jerusalem on 17 January 2022. [Mostafa Alkharouf - Anadolu Agency]

January 18, 2022 

Israel has been condemned by Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas for the eviction of a Palestinian family in Sheikh Jarrah, Al Watan Voice has reported.

An official statement from the president's office described the attempted eviction of the Salehiyah family from their home in Sheikh Jarrah as "forced expulsion" which is a "flagrant violation" of international and humanitarian law. "As such, international intervention is needed urgently to protect the Palestinian people and to rein-in Israel and its criminal policies."

Israeli occupation forces placed a cordon around the house of Mahmoud Salehiyah in Sheikh Jarrah early on Monday morning. The family were told to leave so that the house could be demolished.

Salehiyah climbed onto the roof of the house and refused to move. After 10 hours, with the family still in their home, reported Safa, the Israeli forces withdrew from the area.

READ: Palestinian threatens to set himself on fire over Israeli eviction order

The Salehiyah family was originally expelled from their house in the West Jerusalem neighbourhood of Ein Karem in 1948 during the Zionist ethnic cleansing of the village. They bought a new house in the 1950s in Sheikh Jarrah neighbourhood, about a decade before Israel occupied and annexed — illegally — the area. Now, the Israeli-run Jerusalem Municipality is trying to expel them yet again.

The office of the PA president said that the Israeli escalation against Palestinian homes in occupied Jerusalem coincides with the state's policy to build a new settlement for "illegal Jewish settlers". It called for the US to put an end to the Israeli escalation; hailed resilience of the Palestinians in Sheikh Jarrah; and thanked EU representatives and other diplomats who visited Sheikh Jarrah in solidarity with its residents.


Diplomats slam Israel over attempts to expel Palestinian family from Sheikh Jarra

The EU's delegation to the Palestinian people tweeted that it's '[i]mperative to deescalate the situation and seek a peaceful solution'.

The New Arab Staff
18 January, 2022

The Salahia family is made up of seven adults and five children [Mucahit Aydemir/Anadolu Agency/Getty]

Diplomats and global institutions have slammed Israel over its continued attempts to expel Palestinians living in occupied East Jerusalem's Sheikh Jarrah neighbourhood.

It comes as Israel on Tuesday released one 22-year-old Palestinian man who was detained on Monday amid Tel Aviv's efforts to take his family's home, under the pretext of "constructing a school".

The Palestinian man, identified as Abdullah Ikermawi, who belongs to the Salahia family, was conditioned to pay a 500 shekel ($160) fine and ordered to stay away from the house for three days, according to Palestine's official Wafa news agency.

"The occupation forces arrested my son Abdullah yesterday [Monday], just for filming the occupation security's siege of our Sheikh Jarrah house and their attack against us and attempt to remove us from our home," his mother, Amal Salahia, said.

Though the Salahia family, made up of seven adults and five children, have not yet been forced out of their house, Israel knocked down a plant nursery they own.

Palestinian family threaten to burn themselves if expelled

"The eviction, should it be completed, would leave five children with nowhere to live in the middle of a winter cold snap – this cannot be allowed to happen," Norwegian Refugee Council Palestine chief Caroline Ort noted on Monday.

Sven Kühn von Burgsdorff, the European Union's most-senior official in Jerusalem, and other diplomats looked on as Israel worked to try and force the Salahias out that day.

The EU's delegation to the Palestinian people tweeted: "Imperative to deescalate the situation and seek a peaceful resolution.

"Evictions/demolitions are illegal under international law and significantly undermine the prospects for peace as well as fuel tensions on the ground."

The UK's consul general in Jerusalem, Diane Corner, also "b[ore] witness" to what was happening, according to the consulate.

It added: "Evictions in Occupied Territory are against international humanitarian law in all but the most exceptional circumstances.

"The United Kingdom urges the Government of Israel to cease such practices which only serve to increase tensions on the group."

Neighbouring Jordan slammed Israel's actions, according to Wafa.

The foreign ministry said: "The evictions and displacement of Palestinians in occupied East Jerusalem are a flagrant violation of international law and international humanitarian law.

"Israel, as the occupying power in East Jerusalem, is mandated by international law to protect Palestinians' rights to their homes."

It also argued demolitions, expulsions and other Israeli actions "undermine the changes of realising a just and comprehensive peace founded on the two-state solution".

The Organisation of Islamic Cooperation also hit out at Israel on Tuesday, situating what has happened as part of a wider effort at removing Palestinians and urging global actors to work to stop Israel's abuses in Jerusalem, Wafa said.

 


Amnesty warns over 'sportswashing' at Beijing Olympics


China is hosting the 2022 Winter Olympics (AFP/Leo RAMIREZ)


Wed, January 19, 2022, 3:45 AM·3 min read

Amnesty International warned on Wednesday that the international community must not allow China to use the Winter Olympics in Beijing as a "sportswashing opportunity" and must avoid being "complicit in a propaganda exercise".

The organisation fears China will use the Games to distract from alleged human rights violations against Uyghur Muslims and in Hong Kong, arguing that the situation in the country is worse now than when it hosted the Summer Olympics in 2008.

Amnesty's China researcher, Alkan Akad, said: "The Beijing Winter Olympics must not be allowed to pass as a mere sportswashing opportunity for the Chinese authorities and the international community must not become complicit in a propaganda exercise.

"The world must heed the lessons of the Beijing 2008 Games, when Chinese government promises of human rights improvements never materialised.

"Amid the severe restrictions in place at Beijing 2022, the International Olympic Committee (IOC) must do better at keeping its promise to protect athletes' right to voice their opinions -- and above all to ensure it is not complicit in any violations of athletes' rights."

The United States, Australia, Canada and Britain have announced they will not send official representation to the Olympics, with the US citing "the ongoing genocide and crimes against humanity in Xinjiang and other human rights violations".

Nevertheless, athletes from those countries will still participate in the event, which starts on February 4.

Amnesty's UK chief executive Sacha Deshmukh said Britain's diplomatic boycott of the Games, announced last month, had to be the start of efforts to turn up the pressure on China, not the end.

"China is hoping for sportswashing gold and it's vital that every effort is made to counteract that," Deshmukh said.

- Get tough -

The Amnesty report comes after US lawmakers on Tuesday called on the UN human rights chief to release a report on Xinjiang, where Washington accuses China of perpetrating a genocide against minority Uyghur Muslims, before the start of the Olympics.

UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet, the former Chilean president, has been asking Beijing for "meaningful and unhindered access" to Xinjiang for years, but no such visit has so far been made possible.

In mid-December, a spokesman for the high commissioner had indicated that a report could however be published in "a few weeks".

But human rights defenders are calling on the United Nations to get tough. Several rights organisations have accused China of having locked up at least a million Muslims in Xinjiang.

Beijing denies the figure and describes the camps as "vocational training centres" to support employment and fight religious extremism.

Amnesty also criticised the IOC's handling of the case of tennis player Peng Shuai.

The athlete's wellbeing has become a major source of concern since she disappeared from public view after she alleged on social media that she was sexually assaulted by a senior member of the Chinese government.

The IOC came under pressure to exert its influence and engage the Chinese authorities over Peng, and has held video calls with her which, it says, establish that she is safe and well.

But Amnesty's Akad said the body had accepted assurances "without corroborating whether she experienced any limitations to her freedom of expression, freedom of movement and right to privacy".

jw/phz/imm
Hong Kong experts defend decision to euthanize hamsters, other animals with COVID-19

By UPI Staff

Jan. 19 (UPI) -- Despite opposition and outrage from animal lovers and activists, experts in Hong Kong are defending their decision to euthanize hundreds of hamsters and other small animals after several tested positive for COVID-19 at a local pet shop.

Authorities said Tuesday that they would euthanize about 2,000 hamsters and other small animals after nearly a dozen hamsters imported from the Netherlands were found to be carrying traces of the coronavirus -- and multiple people linked to the pet shop also tested positive.

Although many health experts say it's unlikely that animals can pass COVID-19 on to humans, Hong Kong officials say they made the move because it's in the interest of public health.

Hong Kong respiratory disease expert David Hui said on Wednesday that, despite a lack of evidence, the chances of the virus spreading from hamsters to humans is "very high."

"The shopkeepers have to take care of the hamsters and clean their cages. There are many ways in which they could get infected," he said, according to the Hong Kong Free Press.

"There's no way to test each [hamster] individually. From a public health perspective, you have to euthanize the whole batch."

Animal lovers and activists reacted to the euthanization order with anger, and gathered thousands of signatures on a petition in a bid to stop the government from killing the animals.

Hong Kong's Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals told The Straits Times that it's shocked over the government's decision and is working to find an alternative solution to euthanasia.

"This is not mercy killing. This is murder," pet owner and actor Shafin Azim said, according to the Times. "Find a better way -- close the shop for a while, wear full protective gear before feeding, test them again.

"Are we culling the humans who are actually spreading this?"

Hong Kong govt's hamster culling over Covid-19 ignites fury of pet
(ANIMAL) lovers

The kill order came a day after a sales employee at Little Boss was reported to be infected with the Delta variant. 
PHOTO: BLOOMBERG

Claire Huang
Hong Kong Correspondent

HONG KONG - The mass culling of thousands of hamsters in the city over links to a coronavirus cluster has ignited the fury of pet lovers and anti-cruelty groups, with an online petition gaining traction.

The exasperation and angst of some residents came after the government on Tuesday (Jan 18) announced that it would put down about 2,000 hamsters from the Netherlands, as well as a number of other furry animals such as rabbits and chinchillas.

The authorities made the firm decision in the hope of cutting off Covid-19 transmission from Little Boss, a Causeway Bay pet shop where at least three people have tested positive, leading to fears of greater spread of the virus.

An online petition to stop the mass cull was created and garnered tens of thousands of signatures.

The government's move was heartbreaking for housewife Ashley Lee's two school-going daughters, who have been keeping a hamster since 2020.

"I have really mixed feelings about this issue right now. I can't really say culling is the best option for these little animals," she said, adding that her children have drawn up a plan to keep their pet safe.

"They said visitors are not allowed to touch our hamster any more and they're going to check if the visitors have been vaccinated or not."

Pet owner Shafin Azim, 40, who used to have hamsters and now cats, was shocked and livid.

In a Facebook post, the actor, who has two cats, said: "This is not mercy killing. This is murder. Find a better way - close the shop for a while, wear full protective gear before feeding, test them again.

"Are we culling the humans who are actually spreading this?"

Health officials, who defended the move, said the decision was necessary as the hamsters can excrete the virus and infect other pets and humans.

The kill order came a day after a sales employee at Little Boss, which has 15 branches and a warehouse in Tai Po, was reported on Monday to be infected with the Delta variant of the coronavirus. Some animal samples later tested positive.

A worker from Hong Kong's Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department inside the Little Boss pet store on Jan 18, 2022. PHOTO: BLOOMBERG

Respiratory medicine expert Leung Chi Chiu told The Straits Times that the Delta variant in the pet shop worker had a genomic sequence never seen before in Hong Kong.

Her frequent occupational exposure to a heavily infected horde of hamsters could lead to the "first reported case of what is likely hamster-to-human transmission", Dr Leung said.

He noted that hamsters, like chickens, are raised in herds and pose a hazard not only to those exposed occupationally but also pet owners. So once a human is infected, it could lead to rapid dissemination.

"Testing cannot exclude infection in incubation period, as well as low or intermittent viral shedding. Culling is therefore needed not only to protect the pet owners but also to prevent outbreak in our community," added Dr Leung.

The Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SPCA) said it was shocked and concerned over the decision, "which did not take animal welfare and human-animal bond into consideration".

"The SPCA hopes the Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department (AFCD) won't take any drastic action before reviewing its approach. The SPCA will liaise with AFCD through different channels and discuss alternative approaches," it said.

MORE ON THIS TOPIC
Hong Kong to cull hamsters after Covid-19 found in pet shop

Officials have ordered all pet shops in the city selling hamsters to shutter temporarily and appealed to families who have bought a hamster from the Little Boss pet store since Dec 22 to hand over their pet for euthanasia.

This has sparked concern from pet lovers that some people will start abandoning their pets, particularly hamsters.

The SPCA urged pet owners not to panic or abandon their pets, and to maintain strict personal hygiene.

Hong Kong officials have been scrambling to stop the spread of Omicron, which is the dominant coronavirus strain in the city, as untraceable cases in the community started popping up in the last three weeks.

Their worries have been compounded on Wednesday as clusters emerged in schools and elsewhere.

Hong Kong added 16 new cases on Wednesday, with seven of them local. This brings the total to more than 12,800 Covid-19 cases and 213 deaths.




Heartbreak as Hong Kong pet owners give up hamsters for Covid cull

AFP - 

Time was running out for Pudding.

The hamster, a new addition to the Hau family, was to be given up to Hong Kong authorities for culling after rodents in a pet shop tested positive for coronavirus -- leaving Pudding's 10-year-old owner wailing in grief.


© Bertha WANG
People queue to drop off their hamsters at a government facility in Hong Kong

"I don't want to, I don't want to," the boy cried, his head buried in his hands as he crouched next to Pudding's pink cage, according to a video shown to AFP by his father.


© Bertha WANG
Hong Kong has ordered 1,000 animals in a pet shop to be culled along with another 1,000 hamsters in other shops across the city

But the older Hau, who would only provide his last name, said he was worried about his elderly family members who live in the same household.

"I have no choice -- the government made it sound so serious," he told AFP, shortly before entering a government-run animal management centre to submit Pudding.

He was among a steady trickle of Hong Kong pet owners arriving outside the facility on Wednesday afternoon to give up their unsuspecting furry friends.

Hong Kong on Tuesday ordered 1,000 animals in a pet shop to be culled, along with another 1,000 hamsters in other shops across the city.

Authorities also urged owners to turn in any hamsters purchased after December 22 to be put down.

The decision comes after the discovery of Covid-positive hamsters in the store. Authorities said an employee had contracted the Delta variant -- now rare in the territory -- and they ordered the cull as a "precautionary measure".

- 'Process my emotions' -


Like mainland China, Hong Kong adheres to a staunch "zero-Covid" policy, intolerant of even the merest appearance of the virus in the population of more than seven million.

But the government's latest target appears especially harsh, and swift rebukes from outraged animal lovers have pinged across social media pages.


© Bertha WANG
Cheung, 32, is part of an online community of Hong Kong hamster owners who have volunteered to foster any abandoned due to the cull policy

The mood Wednesday among parents waiting to give up their pets for "humane disposal" was more forlorn.

"It began as something happy, we bought (the hamster) so the kid can have some company," a father, who provided only his surname Tsui, told AFP.


© Provided by AFP
Authorities remove hamsters from a pet shop in Hong Kong after an employee and a customer handling hamsters tested positive for coronavirus. The city will cull hundreds of the animals after some were found to have Covid, officials said Tuesday, as the city tries to maintain its strict "zero-Covid" strategy.

"Now it has come to this."

He and his wife had gifted "Marshmallow" -- a grey twitchy-nosed hamster scurrying through plastic tubes -- to their five-year-old son.

"It feels like I'm ending a life," Tsui said, adding that he did not dare break the news of Marshmallow's fate to his son.


"I need to process my own emotions before I know what to say to my kid."

He added he was disappointed the government did not offer alternatives, such as teaching people how to properly quarantine their pets.

- 'Save as many as we can' -


Hong Kong's hamster hunt has led activists and animal lovers to fret over pets being dumped on the streets en masse for fear of contracting the virus.

Cheung, 32, is part of an online community of Hong Kong hamster owners who have volunteered to foster any abandoned due to the policy.

"It's devastating. I couldn't sleep last night, because I really love small animals," he told AFP, providing only his last name over fears about criticising the government's policy.

Hong Kong already has a problem with overwhelmed first-time pet owners deserting their furry companions, and Cheung said the numbers are likely to spike after the policy.

His own two-year-old hamster, Ring, is safe for now, and may soon be joined by others.

"We want to save as many as we can," he said.

hol/dhc/axn

Stop the Government from Wrongfully Euthanising Little Boss’ Small Pets

23,721 have signed. Let’s get to 25,000!

Soren LEE started this petition to Hong Kong SPCA and 


Over 2000 pets at risk for euthanasia.

Over 2000 lives on the brink of being lost.

On 18th of January, 2022, upon a staff member from Little Boss transmitting COVID-19, a hamster tested positive for the illness. The government has now decided that their optimal solution to this is to test all of the animals in the shop at the time and all of the pets that were purchased before December 22nd, and euthanise them whether or not they test positive.

Every pet owner knows that their pet’s lives are just as important as their own, yet the Hong Kong government fails to see that they, the very upholders of law, are on the dangerous path to the murders of many lives that are barely any different to ours. They fail to recognise that the lives of animals are not subjects for their selfish development, and that the act of testing the pets for scientific research and euthanising them regardless of whether they test positive or not is heartless and cruel. Just like humans, these pets could be quarantined and isolated rather than killed off mercilessly, yet authorities insisted on trading over 2000 lives for the sake of “public health needs”.

Therefore, we are asking you to lend a hand by signing this petition to support this cause. A pet is an owner’s best friend, and due to the government’s orders, thousands of people could unjustifiably lose their dearest companions. With your help, we can successfully convince the government that their decision is unjust and brutal, and you could help save dozens of animals in loving homes and happy lives.

Petition · Stop the Government from Wrongfully Euthanising Little Boss’ Small Pets · Change.org

Experts warn more protected areas won’t save biodiversity.


Setting aside at least 30 percent of both land and oceans as protected zones is the cornerstone target of the so-called global biodiversity framework to be finalised in May at UN negotiations in Kunming, China.

© Provided by The South African

Agence France-Presse 

But a report by more than 50 top experts said the draft plan still falls far short of what is needed.

“We’re in the middle of a biodiversity crisis, with a million species at risk of extinction,” lead author Paul Leadley, a professor at Paris-Saclay University, told AFP.


“There’s good evidence that we will fail again to meet ambitious international biodiversity objectives if there’s too much focus on protected areas at the expense of other urgent actions.”

The plan, under negotiation by nearly 200 nations, sets a score of targets for 2030 — and aims by 2050 to reverse biodiversity loss and be “living in harmony with nature.”

The world failed almost entirely to reach a similar set of 10-year objectives set a decade ago at UN talks in Aichi, Japan.

“We keep trying to treat a critically ill patient with plasters — that has to stop,” said Leadley.

Echoing a similar warning issued by the UN’s science advisory panel for climate change, Leadley and his colleagues said reversing the damage done to nature will require “transformative change” in society, starting with the way we produce and consume food.

MULTIPLE DRIVERS

Policymakers must also realise that all the drivers of extinction — habitat loss and fragmentation, over-hunting for food and profit, pollution, the spread of invasive species — must be tackled at once.

“Biodiversity loss is caused by multiple direct drivers in nearly all cases, meaning that actions on only one or a few will be insufficient to halt continued loss,” the report said.

Climate change is also rapidly emerging as a major threat to many animal and plant species on land and in the oceans, outpacing their ability to adapt.

Limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels — “essential” for protecting nature — is not adequately reflected in the draft targets, the authors say.

Earth’s surface has already warmed 1.1C, enough to unleash a crescendo of climate-enhanced storms, heatwaves, droughts and flooding.

And it works both ways, the report warns: “Protecting and restoring biodiversity are key to achieving the climate mitigation and adaptation goals of the Paris Agreement.”

NATURE-BASED SOLUTIONS


As with climate, there’s no time to lose.

“The sooner we act the better,” said co-author Maria Cecilia Londono Murcia, a researcher at Humboldt Institute in Colombia.

“Time lags between action and positive outcomes for biodiversity can take decades.”

The report also takes the draft treaty to task for not spelling out how goals will be achieved and enforced.

Targets are all well and good, it suggests, “but it is how these targets are implemented … that will determine success.”

Other targets set for 2030 include:

– reducing by 50 percent the rate at which alien species are spreading across the globe;

– reducing nutrients such as fertiliser leaching into the environment by at least half, and pesticides by at least two-thirds;

– eliminating the discharge of plastic waste;

– using nature-based solutions to cut greenhouse gas emissions by at least 10 billion tons of CO2 or its equivalent;

– reducing subsidies that harm biodiversity by at least $500 billion (440 billion euros) per year.

“For every euro we spend globally to help biodiversity, we spend at least five on things that destroy it,” said co-author Aleksandar Rankovic, a researcher at the Paris Institute of Political Studies.

Nations will gather in Geneva in March for technical meetings ahead of the crunch talks in April and May.

By Laure FILLON

© Agence France-Presse

Also read: Global warming will continue no matter what we do, new study finds



Arabic oud icon seeks to 'change soul' of Iraq with music




Exiled in 1993 under dictator Saddam Hussein, Naseer Shamma only returned to his native Iraq for the first time in 2012 (AFP/AHMAD AL-RUBAYE)

Guillaume Decamme
Tue, January 18, 2022

Long uprooted from his native Iraq, Naseer Shamma, an icon of the Arabic oud, has returned home to help rekindle the flame of Iraqi music, snuffed out by decades of conflict.

"When you are in your own country, you feel very high emotions with the audience," the master string player said in an interview with AFP.

At nearly 60, the virtuoso who studied under late Iraqi oud legend Munir Bashir still appears in awe of his instrument, as well as those that accompany it.


"All those instruments are Iraqi -- you have the santur for example. Each one is from 2000 BC," he said at the national theatre orchestra packed with Iraqi instruments.

"They are very historic instruments and the sound is a very special sound."

Speaking between rehearsals, he added: "There is nostalgia here, with friends. I studied in Baghdad for six years and I always feel more comfortable when I play here."

But such nights in Baghdad have become more of an exception than the rule for Shamma, a native of Kut, in the country's southeast.

Exiled in 1993 under dictator Saddam Hussein, he only returned to Iraq for the first time in 2012.

In the interim, he spent time in Cairo, as well as launching schools of Arabic oud across the Middle East, before settling in Berlin, where he lives now.

- 'Education first' -

Aside from his musical mission, his latest Baghdad performances come with another purpose.

"Now we're playing to help education. My new project is called 'education first'. We need to help Iraqi schools," Shamma said.

As UNICEF has pointed out, "decades of conflict and under-investment in Iraq have destroyed what used to be the best education system in the region and severely curtailed Iraqi children's access to quality learning".

From the Iran-Iraq war of the 1980s to the subsequent international embargoes, the 2003 US-led invasion and the later Islamic State group takeover, Iraq has struggled to emerge from bloody turmoil.

"And of course, three or four generations paid the price of this," Shamma said.

Despite the sluggish pace of Iraq's recovery and the political disputes that always threaten to erupt into new violence, the musician is hopeful for change.

"We hope that music... will change the soul of people," he said.

While Iraq is still far from its cultural heyday of the 1970s and 80s, it has recently seen a fledgling renaissance, with art galleries opening and book fairs and festivals being held.

"We need to close the bad past and start again a new life with a new memory and a new vision for the future," Shamma said.

gde/jsa/fz/lg

92-year-old Malawian music legend finds fame on TikTok



 Malawian music legend Giddes Chalamanda has notched up
 millions of views on TikTok (AFP/Amos Gumulira)

Jack McBrams
Tue, January 18, 2022

At 92, Giddes Chalamanda has no idea what TikTok is. He doesn't even own a smartphone.

And yet the Malawian music legend has become a social media star, with his song "Linny Hoo" garnering over 80 million views on the video-sharing platform and spawning mashups and remixes from South Africa to the Philippines.

"They come and show me the videos on their phones, but I have no idea how it works," Chalamanda told AFP at his home on the edge of a macadamia plantation, about 20 kilometres (12 miles) from Malawi's main city Blantyre.

"But I love the fact that people are enjoying themselves and that my talent is getting the right attention," he said, speaking in Chewa.

Despite his grey hair and slight stoop, the nonagenarian singer and guitarist, who has been a constant presence on the Malawian music scene for seven decades, displays a youthful exuberance as he sits chatting with a group of young fans.

He first recorded "Linny", an ode to one of his daughters, in 2000.

But global acclaim only came two decades later when Patience Namadingo, a young gospel artist, teamed up with Chalamanda to record a reggae remix of "Linny" titled "Linny Hoo".

The black-and-white video of the recording shows a smiling, gap-toothed Chalamanda, nattily dressed in a white shirt and V-neck sweater, jamming with Namadingo under a tree outside his home, with a group of neighbours looking on.

The video went viral after it was posted on YouTube, where it racked up more than 6.9 million views. It can be seen here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lOK_ODvA4Os

Then late last year, it landed on TikTok and toured the globe.

Chalamanda only learned of the song's sensational social media popularity from his children and their friends.

Since then he and Namadingo have recorded remixes of several others of his best-known tracks.

His daughter Linny's 16-year-old son Stepson Austin told AFP that he was proud of his grandfather's longevity.

"It is good that he has lived long enough to see this day," said the youngster, who himself aspires to become a hip-hop artist.

Born in Chiradzulu, a small town in southern Malawi, Chalamanda won fame in his homeland with lilting songs such as "Buffalo Soldier" in which he dreams of visiting America and "Napolo".

Over the past decade, he has collaborated with several younger musicians and still performs across the country.



















- 'Dance around the world' -


On TikTok, DJs and ordinary fans have created their own remixes as part of a #LinnyHooChallenge.

"When his music starts playing in a club or at a festival, everyone gets the urge to dance. That is how appealing it is," musician and long-time collaborator Davis Njobvu told AFP.

"The fact that he has been there long enough to work with the young ones is special."

South Africa-based music producer Joe Machingura attributed the global appeal of a song recorded in Chewa, one of Malawi's most widely-spoken languages, to the sentiments underlying it.

"The old man sang with so much passion, it connects with whoever listens to it," he said, adding: "It speaks to your soul."

Chalamanda, a twice-married father of 14 children, only seven of whom, including Linny, are still alive, said he has no idea how to secure royalties for the TikTok plays.

Chalamanda and his wife hope to benefit financially from his new-found stardom.

"I am just surprised that despite the popularity of the song, there is nothing for me," he said. "While I am excited that I have made people dance all around the world, there should be some gain for me. I need the money."

His manager Pemphero Mphande told AFP that he was looking into the issue and the Copyright Society of Malawi said it was ready to assist.


Arts curator Tammy Mbendera of the Festival Institute in Malawi credited platforms like TikTok with creating new opportunities for African talent.

"With songs from our past especially, they were written with such profoundness that they still can resonate today," she said.

"All one has to do really, is get the chance to experience it, to acknowledge its significance. I think that's what happened here."


str-gs/sn/cb

Consumers Spent $2.3B on TikTok in 2021, Up 77 Percent

(Michele Ursi/Dreamstime.com)

By    |   Tuesday, 18 January 2022 06:45 PM

Users of the video-sharing app TikTok, which Beijing-based technology company ByteDance owns, spent $2.3 billion on the platform last year, according to Sensor Tower.

But before the breakout of the COVID-19 pandemic in October 2019, Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg met with then-President Donald Trump to warn of the threat TikTok posed to national security and U.S. businesses. A year later, Trump signed an executive order demanding that ByteDance divest itself from its U.S. operations.

More recently, under President Joe Biden, Trump's executive order was rescinded and replaced with Biden's own executive order calling for an evaluation of ''threats through rigorous, evidence-based analysis.'' In light of the app's pervasive use across the United States, however, it is unclear what framework the Biden administration has or will establish to combat security threats.

TikTok saw a 77% increase in user spending to $2.3 billion in 2021, up from $1.3 billion in 2020. The spending included transactions made on the heavily censored Chinese iOS version, Douyin.

In addition, Sensor Tower data showed that the United States was the second-largest spender on the app behind China.

But in light of security concerns, TikTok, which has surpassed Facebook with 3 billion installations, has argued in an August 2020 lawsuit that it has ''not and has never been offered in China,'' arguing that it was unfair for the Trump administration to issue an executive order to ban the app.

But according to Breitbart's reporting, ''six current and former TikTok employees'' say ''the firm was still largely under the influence of ByteDance's Beijing headquarters. Four current and former staffers told Business Insider that discussions relating to TikTok's products often require calls with employees at ByteDance's China HQ and final product decisions are regularly made in Beijing.''

In June, CNBC reported that ''the Biden administration had asked the court to postpone action around [a] government dispute with TikTok over the ban as it reviewed the situation. White House press secretary Jen Psaki said at the time that a [Committee for Foreign Investment in the U.S] review of TikTok was ongoing.''

It is unclear if the review is ongoing.

Felony charges are first in fatal crash involving Tesla Autopilot

Driver was using partially automated driving in incident that killed two people

California prosecutors have filed two counts of vehicular manslaughter against the driver of a Tesla on Autopilot who ran a red light, slammed into another car and killed two people in 2019.

The accused appears to be the first person to be charged with a felony in the US for a fatal crash involving a motorist who was using a partially automated driving system. Los Angeles County prosecutors filed the charges in October, but they came to light only last week.

The driver, Kevin George Aziz Riad, has pleaded not guilty. Mr Riad, a limousine service driver, is free on bail while the case is pending.

The misuse of Autopilot, which can control steering, speed and braking, has occurred on numerous occasions and is the subject of investigations by two federal agencies.

The filing of charges in the California crash could serve notice to drivers who use systems like Autopilot that they cannot rely on them to control vehicles.

The criminal charges are not the first involving an automated driving system, but they are the first to involve a widely used driver technology. Authorities in Arizona filed a charge of negligent homicide in 2020 against a driver Uber had hired to take part in the testing of a fully autonomous vehicle on public roads. The Uber vehicle, an SUV with the human backup driver on board, struck and killed a pedestrian.

By contrast, Autopilot and other driver-assist systems are widely used on roads across the world.

An estimated 765,000 Tesla vehicles are equipped with it in the US alone.

In the Tesla crash, police said a Model S was moving at a high speed when it left a freeway and ran a red light in the Los Angeles suburb of Gardena and struck a Honda Civic at an intersection on December 29, 2019. Two people who were in the Civic, Gilberto Alcazar Lopez and Maria Guadalupe Nieves-Lopez, died at the scene.

Mr Riad and a woman in the Tesla were admitted to hospital with non-life threatening injuries.

FILE - In this March 23, 2018 file photo provided by KTVU, emergency personnel work a the scene where a Tesla electric SUV crashed into a barrier on U.S. Highway 101 in Mountain View, Calif.  Tesla says, Saturday, March 31,  the vehicle in a fatal crash last week in California was operating on Autopilot, the latest accident to involve self-driving technology. The automaker says the driver, who was killed in the accident, did not have his hands on the steering wheel for six seconds before the crash. Tesla says its Autopilot feature, which can keep speed, change lanes and self-park, requires drivers to keep their eyes on the road and hands on the wheel to take control of the vehicle to avoid accidents. (KTVU via AP)

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and the National Transport Safety Board have been reviewing the widespread misuse of Autopilot by drivers, whose overconfidence and inattention have been blamed for multiple crashes, including fatal ones. In one crash report, the latter agency referred to its misuse as “automation complacency".

The agency said that in a 2018 crash in Culver City, California, in which a Tesla hit a firetruck, the design of the Autopilot system had “permitted the driver to disengage from the driving task”. No one was hurt in that crash.

Last May, a California man was arrested after officers noticed his Tesla moving down a motorway with the man in the back seat and no one behind the steering wheel.

Teslas that have had Autopilot in use also have hit a motorway barrier or tractor-trailers that were crossing roads. The NHTSA has sent investigative teams to 26 crashes involving Autopilot since 2016, involving at least 11 deaths.

Since the Autopilot crashes began, Tesla has updated the software to try to make it harder for drivers to abuse it. It has also tried to improve Autopilot’s ability to detect emergency vehicles.

The families of Lopez and Nieves-Lopez have sued Tesla and Mr Riad in separate lawsuits. They have alleged negligence by Mr Riad and have accused Tesla of selling defective vehicles that can accelerate suddenly and that lack an effective automatic emergency braking system. A joint trial is scheduled for mid-2023.

Lopez’s family, in court documents, alleges that the car “suddenly and unintentionally accelerated to an excessive, unsafe and uncontrollable speed”. Nieves-Lopez’s family further asserts that Mr Riad was an unsafe driver, with multiple moving infractions on his record, and couldn’t handle the high-performance Tesla.

Separately, the NHTSA is investigating a dozen crashes in which a Tesla on Autopilot ran into several parked emergency vehicles. In the crashes under investigation, at least 17 people were injured and one person was killed.

Updated: January 18th 2022, 5:07 PM