Wednesday, February 23, 2022



Tuesday's letters: Conservatives wrong to back protesters


Edmonton Journal
 - Yesterday


The Conservative Party of Canada has failed spectacularly to provide an efficient Opposition government. That role is to hold a governing party accountable, not fight and point fingers on every single item in order to win some imaginary argument. The most recent interim leader has displayed only an ability to accuse and rant and appears unable to answer legitimate questions. And we all know how inefficient our own Alberta premier has shown himself. We know and his party knows.

The so-called Freedom Convoy has held all Canadians, particularly those in our nation’s capital, hostage by their occupation and their ongoing disruptions to businesses and homes around the country. The CPC has decided to back these criminals and mistakenly considers them equal to those millions of Canadians who have lived lives according to the law. We have mostly all tried to do our best through this pandemic. It has been a learning curve for the medical fields, for the governments around the world, and for each one of us with our own families.

Remember who the CPC is backing and their inability to efficiently take care of government business when you are next voting.

Suzanne Ulvstal, Sherwood Park

Invoking Emergencies Act is justified


The threat from extremists on the right is real. It is not a debate about public health measures or government mandate. That is a cover for racists Tinfoil-hatted fools are pawns for serious anti-democratic elements, an imported coalition of dangerous uncivil anarchists. They shout “freedom” but have no idea how a civilized society ensures it democratically.

As a long-time supporter of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, I have written to ask them to moderate their concerns about the Emergency Act. I was on the board when we opposed the use of the War Measures Act in 1970. I think we were right then. There were many abuses of those powers. The WMA was a real threat to our democracy.

But the current Emergency Act is much less draconian and Parliament has lots of leverage to control its application. My advice to CCLA is to keep a critical eye on events but acknowledge that this is not a civil demonstration but a cover for an attack on our democracy and a danger to our civil rights.

Government can target the miscreants. Most middle-of-the-road and moderate Canadians support a crackdown on the scofflaws. Most Canadians still prefer peace, order and good government to the bullying of the mob.

Bruce Rogers, Edmonton
Walcott: We need to counter the Freedom Convoy with a rallying cry for equality and hope


Looking upon the Freedom Convoy’s occupation of Ottawa, the weekly protests in Calgary, Toronto and Edmonton, the fragility of Canadian society is apparent.
Courtney Walcott - Yesterday 
Courtney Walcott is the city councillor for Ward 8 in Calgary.

Canadian society is not fragile because of how easy it is for our citizens to express their discontent; it is fragile because of how long we allow discontent to fester into intolerant views, into hate towards institutions, and toward each other, before we act.

As I scroll through social media feeds, watch the news and listen to the rhetoric of my peers and leaders across the country, it is easy to recognize a movement of hatred taking root. And while it is convenient to characterize these protests as nothing more than far-right movements with hints of white supremacy and even easier to dismiss their grievances on the flawed ideologies that underpin them, it would be an immense failure to not recognize that the roots of collective discontent represent something broader occurring in our society.

While I try to stay objective, it is impossible not to feel provoked when seeing the number of protesters who spout white supremacist views, that spread anti-science conspiracy theories, twist data to minimize the cost of the unnecessary lives lost, and those who deem vaccines and masks “tyranny!” Focusing on these disheartening features of the protests glosses over the reality that so many have become radicalized, and that in many cases, it has been compounding societal failures that allowed it to happen.

At the beginning of the pandemic, Canadians came face to face with the many structural issues that underpin the true fragility of our society’s institutions: few social safety nets, lack of living wages and the consequences of underfunding our health-care institutions. Programs to bandage our fragile institutions such as CERB and CEWS acted as stop-gap measures to issues that need to be addressed.

But eventually, CERB ended and public health measures became a matter of politics instead of science. Throughout it all, the wealthy became even wealthier while the average entrepreneur, wage worker or front-line worker were rocked by uncertainty and left struggling to find their footing.

In the absence of a clear path forward, whether through the failures of government to provide such a path or through the intentional obscuring of facts by peddlers of conspiracy, people rightfully felt fear. It is here, in moments of precarity, anxiety and discontent that a growing extremist element sees an opportunity to weaponize public anxiety into the protests we see occupying our streets.

Bad faith actors have seized upon the opportunity presented in this discontent and contorted it into a feeling that what has been lost, has actually been taken, and we must reclaim “it,” whatever “it” is.

For folks like Pat King and B.J. Dichter, leaders of the Freedom Convoy movement, “it” is a desperate attempt to gain power and control. For them, this is an opportunity to fuel their own movements, which have been widely seen as white supremacist and xenophobic.

We hear this in the claims of victimhood found in King’s videos about conspiracies to “depopulate the Anglo-Saxon race because they are the ones with the strongest bloodlines” or Dichter’s belief that the Liberal party is “infested with Islamists.” The organizers of these protests are waving flags of “freedom from COVID-19” to cover for the deeper roots of extremism and discrimination.

In my experience as someone who has spent years doing anti-racism work, I’d be remiss not to mention how familiar all of this seems, if not just slightly more extreme. It appears that at the intersection of COVID-19 discontent also sits a similar discontent with progressive movements for Black Lives Matter, #METOO and 2SLGBTQ+. The radicalization of certain individuals is easier to comprehend when we consider how many people over the last 10 years have confidently expressed extreme displeasure at discussions of intersectionality, of privilege, of tackling systemic discrimination.

Opposition to many of these movements is characterized by delusions of self-sufficiency, of complete autonomy, of complete disregard for the other.

Anti-poverty movements attempting to support the most vulnerable have long been told to “pull themselves up by the bootstraps.” Faced with police killings of unarmed Black people, calls for police reform have been met with “Don’t want to get shot? Don’t resist.” And now, with COVID-19, we hear this same selfish and self-centred attitude in “if you don’t want to get COVID, stay home.”

Many have bought into the belief that individuals have complete agency, that the outcome of our lives is not deeply intertwined with the systems around us.

Which is why it surprised no one when a range of signs and symbols are carried in these so-called “freedom” protests. Signs carried confidently with the words “All Lives Matter” scribbled across it. Others proclaim “segregation,” as if, at least in Alberta, the protesters are not firmly in the front seats of the bus.

Signs reading “My Body, My Choice” are being appropriated by conservative men in trucks — historically not a demographic that overwhelmingly defends a women’s right to choose.

The use of these symbols, signs, and slogans is almost unfathomable, except for the fact that we’ve seen them in our streets before.


We need to call these people back. Canadians must learn to be able to express discontent with our world without degrading the progress we’ve made. Dealing with our individual pain cannot come at the cost of causing pain to another.

It would be irresponsible for my peers and leaders across the country to not recognize that in the aftermath of COVID, people are looking for a fairer and more equitable future. One that helps to build a society that cares deeply for its members that is more just and holds greater opportunity for all. One that looks to address the undercurrent of discontent exposed by COVID-19.

In this moment, it can feel like, if anything, we’ve seen those horizons recede even further.

In the vacuum of progressive visions, extremists are taking advantage of people’s sense of being left behind. COVID-19 has deepened the existing inequalities and reinforced the alienation and isolation many already felt in our society. Unfortunately, weekly rallies in cities across Canada are not being organized around equity and justice.

So maybe that’s what has to come next: an equal swell and force of people demanding equity, demanding opportunity, challenging the rules of our society to protect the most vulnerable and truly provide equality of opportunity for all. In these “unprecedented times,” such voices need to be louder and clearer in this moment.

To cut through the noise of discontent and opportunism of anti-vaxxers, of the “Freedom Convoy,” we need to build a path forward with opportunity, optimism and hope.

And we need to cement once and for all that freedom is not just something we choose or demand; It is something we share.

THE PROTESTS CONTINUE ACROSS CANADA

Police warn COVID-19 protesters in Winnipeg to clear out or risk consequences


Winnipeg police have issued an ultimatum to protesters who have parked vehicles near the Manitoba legislature for almost three weeks.

Officers delivered a letter to the protesters that warns they could face charges or have their vehicles seized if they do not clear out by late Wednesday afternoon.

More than a dozen large vehicles have blocked a street near the legislature to protest COVID-19 restrictions, although traffic in the surrounding area continues to flow.

Winnipeg Mayor Brian Bowman has called on the protesters to leave, citing the disruption caused by the occupation of a street and blaring horns.

The protesters have said they have been peaceful and have co-operated with police, and recently moved trucks away from the front entrance to the legislature grounds.

They have demanded a meeting with the prime minister, but city police have told them to remove all their vehicles.

"Your ongoing presence and blocking of streets is interfering with the lawful use and enjoyment of personal and public property," the letter issued Tuesday by police states.

"Failure to (remove vehicles) may result in enforcement action being taken, including arrest and charges."

The letter lists a number of options, including powers under the federal Emergencies Act "which could include seizing vehicles, trailers and other equipment, and the freezing of assets."

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Feb. 22, 2022

The Canadian Press
OTTAWA CONVOY ENDS WITH A WHIMPER
Small group of protesters hole up on farm near Arnprior

Arnprior – As police cleared out the remaining protesters occupying various sections of the Parliamentary District in Ottawa on the weekend, about 20 to 30 individuals associated with the three-week occupation of downtown Ottawa fled to a private farm field near Arnprior to regroup and assess the situation.

On Sunday morning, this section of the convoy had dwindled down to a total of three transport trucks, seven pickup trucks and eight passenger vehicles. The encampment is located on White Lake Road near Mountain View Road, about five kilometers outside Arnprior.

Although there was no heavy police presence similar to Ottawa, there was one OPP SUV parked on Mountain View Road outside a residence about 300 meters away from the entrance to the camp. It was not a gated entry and traffic was allowed in.

They originally planned to use the Arnprior Airport for a rallying point on the directions of Pat King, one of the leaders of the “Freedom Convoy.” Mr. King told Facebook video followers to “retreat and regroup” in Arnprior, on airport land across from Antrim Truck Stop. “There is a contingency plan in place … to get to the Antrim Truck Stop. The airport is being plowed.”

Mr. King was in the process of rebroadcasting when he was taken into custody by police officers. His arrest, in combination with the Town of Arnprior’s refusal to allow the convoy members to park at the airport citing the plowing operations are for aircraft, left the small group with the field as their last choice.

For some, they had come to the realization they had probably come to the end of the line for a national movement. Many put on a brave face and there was little open talk of quitting the 24-day protest.

When approaching the encampment a few members of the group were driving out of the camp and agreed to answer some general questions on the condition their names or photographs not be used.

“I am not going to say it’s over, but for now we are drawing back and we are already planning our next move,” said one protestor who called himself John. “One thing we want to make certain is that it is on a national scale just like this one. It is pretty big when we had fellow freedom fighters willing to stand at the border crossings and defy the government.”

The original protest was labelled the Freedom Convoy and it was led by hundreds of individuals involved with the trucking industry who initially demanded the cancellation of COVID vaccine mandates. They argued it would limit the ability of some truck drivers to pass through any Canadian-U.S. border due to mandatory vaccinations on both sides of the border.

Since the “Freedom Convoy” movement began on January 25, the majority of truck drivers left Ottawa within a matter of days leaving behind about 300 protesters in the core of the city until Ottawa Police, in conjunction with other police forces, forced the majority of protesters out of the area and impounded 80 vehicles in the process.

However, for the individuals camping out in the private field, they remained defiant with many vowing to continue their acts of civil disobedience, with their vehicles intact.

“We may look small, but there is a lot of silent support among many Canadians and that is why we are here,” he said. “A lot of our brothers went home because they have to work to put food on the table, but they went back to work because all of Canada depends on truckers to keep the store shelves full.”

When asked who is to blame for the protest going well beyond what was originally planned, another member of the group immediately yelled out “Trudeau.”

Referring to himself only as “Bob,” he laid the blame on the prime minister.

“He is why a lot of good folks are being called thugs and criminals by the mainstream media,” Bob said. “Before he went into hiding, he called us criminals and fringe elements and that Canadians don’t support what we are doing. If that is the case, then why were the streets in every city the trucks drove through on the way to Ottawa a few weeks ago lined with supporters? The last time I saw that many Canadians out in force was when Terry Fox ran.”

When asked what they will do if all the mandates are slowly lifted resulting in no government directive, many said it was just a matter of time before the government finds another excuse to restrict the freedoms they are protesting to protect.

“We saw Trudeau bring in the Emergency Act because he said it was a national emergency, but what it does is give him almost unlimited power like seizing bank accounts and that is not right in a democracy like Canada,” one man said. “I don’t think the majority of Canadians understand this power takes away most of their rights and that is why we won’t stop until he stops abusing our rights and freedoms.”

There were no campfires present in the camp Sunday around noon, but there were some small campfires within the area and one portable toilet was located about 50 metres west of the main compound.

The members of the group would not identify their place of origin, but there was a mix of Ontario, Alberta and Saskatchewan licence plates. The group also declined to identify the property owner who is allowing them to stay there.

Bruce McIntyre, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter, The Eganville Leader
THE STATE DEFENDS ITSELF

MPs, senators on Emergencies Act committee will take secrecy oath: gov't Senate rep



OTTAWA — Members of a parliamentary committee set up to scrutinize the Emergencies Act will have to take an oath of secrecy, but will not be given access to highly classified material, says the government's representative in the Senate.

Sen. Marc Gold also told senators that ministers are receiving hourly police updates about potential threats around the country to assess if the emergency law is still needed.

The Senate began debating Tuesday whether to confirm the government's decision to invoke the Emergencies Act for the first time in Canadian history over protests and blockades of Canada's borders by people opposing vaccine mandates and other COVID-19 restrictions.

On Monday evening a majority of the House of Commons voted in favour of confirming the act after the NDP backed the minority Liberal government.

The act must also pass through the Senate, which plans to hold extra-long sittings to debate it. If it fails to approve the act, it would be immediately revoked.

If approved, however, a special joint committee of both the House of Commons and the Senate would be established to review the government’s actions under the act on an ongoing basis.

Gold said those on the committee would have to take an oath of secrecy, but would not receive highly classified intelligence briefings.

Sen. Dennis Glen Patterson of the Canadian Senators Group asked whether committee members could be given higher security clearance or even sworn into the Privy Council to allow them to have access to sensitive security intelligence to inform their decisions.

But Gold said the rules would not allow members of Parliament to "dip in and out" of higher security clearance or be temporarily sworn in. The information the government was basing its decisions on was in the public domain, but the committee would have the power to ask for further access to information, he said.

In often heated exchanges, Gold faced a barrage of questions from senators, including those querying whether the act was still needed now that the Ottawa protest and blockades of Canada's borders have ended.

"What emergency exists today other than some secret emergency you can't tell us about?" asked Sen. Scott Tannas, leader of the Canadian Senators Group.

Tannas expressed concern that the committee would not be set up swiftly enough to allow members from all parties to scrutinize the Act. He asked Gold to commit to explaining every day until the committee convenes why it had not yet been constituted. Gold did not commit to do so.

Tannas said it was a "testimony to Canadians even when they are hot under the collar and the professionalism of the police" that no one had been seriously hurt in the protests.

Gold said he believed that "the job is not yet done," warning that blockades could return and there are signs some protesters are reconvening.

"The calm we now see may be the calm before other events," he warned.

He said the protests had "metastasized into an explosion of illegal activities."

Sen. Don Plett, the leader of the Opposition in the Senate, questioned provisions in the Emergencies Act that allow banks to freeze protesters' accounts, saying a court order is usually needed to freeze bank accounts, including those belonging to members of the Mafia.

Conservative Sen. Leo Housakos accused Prime Minister Justin Trudeau of stoking the flames of division and of not speaking directly to protesters but "speaking down" to them and characterizing them as Nazis.

He also criticized the prime minister for labelling Tory MPs who have not condemned the protests as supporting people who wave swastikas.

Some protesters were seen flying swastika and Confederate flags and some organizers have been known to promote racist conspiracy theories online.

Gold staunchly defended the prime minister and said he does not recognize the Tory senator's characterization of Trudeau's actions and comments.

He said the Emergencies Act is justified because of the gravity of the protests, adding that everyone could resolve to listen more and listen better.

He said "the government continues to believe the job is not yet done" and a threat remains.

In a marathon debate in which Gold single-handedly defended the government's decision to invoke the emergency powers, he argued the protests in Ottawa and blockades at borders were not an "isolated, disconnected phenomenon."

Gold warned that the protest movement, emboldened by its success in Ottawa, could continue to cause disruption throughout Canada.

But some senators accused the government of taking extreme and unnecessary measures.

Sen. Denise Batters, a Conservative senator, accused the prime minister of "massive overreach," saying that the Emergencies Act was not geographically targeted but had been applied throughout Canada, the second largest land mass in the world.

Also questioning powers to freeze bank accounts of those who joined the protest, she asked how a bank would know if a person had stopped participating.

Conservative Sen. Salma Ataullahjan, who chairs the Senate human rights committee, questioned whether invoking the Emergencies Act could set a precedent.

The government's representative in the second chamber said this question was "a preoccupation of many." Gold said the Emergencies Act was less far-reaching with more checks and balances, including parliamentary scrutiny, than its predecessor, the War Measures Act.

He said there were many mechanisms in the act that would allow the Commons and Senate to question its provisions. He said he would be proud to see senators using "all the democratic tools in our kit" to hold the government, or any government, to account.

The parliamentary review committee will include MPs from each party, providing they have more than 12 members, which would exclude the Greens. Senators will also sit on the committee.

All members of the committee and those employed in its work will have to take an oath of secrecy while meetings shall be held in private.

Meanwhile, the office of an NDP MP who spoke in favour of approving the Emergencies Act has been vandalized.

The windows and glass door of Gord Johns' Parksville, B.C., constituency office were smashed after he spoke in the House of Commons on Monday night. It was not immediately clear the vandalism was due to his endorsement of the act.

NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh has indicated he would be prepared to withdraw support for the act if he felt the emergency powers were no longer needed.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Feb. 22, 2022.

Marie Woolf, The Canadian Press

How authorities are targeting the 'freedom convoy' money via the Emergencies Act



Costanza Musu, Associate Professor, Graduate School of Public and International Affairs, L’Université d’Ottawa/University of Ottawa
 
Patrick Leblond, CN-Paul M. Tellier Chair on Business and Public Policy, L’Université d’Ottawa/University of Ottawa - 

The Conversation

The Canadian government gave itself extraordinary powers for a 30-day period to end the “freedom convoy” occupation of Ottawa by invoking the Emergencies Act.

The situation was especially difficult in Ottawa, where trucks occupied the downtown core and Parliament Hill for weeks. Tensions with residents came to a breaking point after three weeks of incessant noise, shuttered businesses, harassment and disruption of normal life.

Two types of emergency measures were adopted.

First, the Emergency Measures Regulations prohibit public gatherings that could “lead to a breach of the peace.” The regulations also ban travelling to such gatherings, as well as providing any type of property in support of them.

Second, the Emergency Economic Measures Order is aimed at starving the convoy of money and deterring people from supporting its activities. It deprived convoy participants of the ability to pay for gasoline to keep vehicles and generators running, food, hotel rooms, bouncy castles, fireworks, etc. The goal was to end the convoy’s activities so that the city of Ottawa could get back to normal without any need for a violent crackdown.

How did the federal government take away the convoy’s financial resources to force them to end their activities? It did so in two ways: by stopping new money from being sent to convoy organizers and participants, and by blocking access to funds already in their hands.

Crowdfunding played a big role


Stopping the flow of new funds means preventing donations from reaching the convoy’s organizers or anyone associated with them. Crowdfunding platforms have been the main vehicle for channelling donations to the convoy.

Until the Emergencies Act was invoked, the only way to stop donations from reaching the convoy was by appealing to the goodwill of crowdfunding platforms, as occurred with GoFundMe, or by seeking legal injunctions against them, as with GiveSendGo.

In GiveSendGo’s case, the crowdfunding platform refused to abide by the judge’s ruling. It claimed that the Ontario court did not have jurisdiction over its operations since it’s based in the United States.

Furthermore, even if GiveSendGo had respected the injunction, donations to the convoy would have just moved to another platform. That’s what happened after GoFundMe froze the funds destined to the convoy; donors moved to GiveSendGo and other platforms, including ones collecting donations in cryptocurrencies like Tallycoin.

The emergency economic measures now require domestic and foreign crowdfunding platforms to register temporarily with the Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (FINTRAC).

This means they must provide FINTRAC with information about donations sent to the convoy (or similar activities being organized), no matter the amount. That’s because the convoy is now considered akin to a terrorist organization.

According to Barry MacKillop, FINTRAC’s deputy director for intelligence, crowdfunding platforms were not under FINTRAC’s regulatory purview until the Emergencies Act was invoked.

Why such platforms were not already covered by existing rules is unclear, since they are in the business of remitting or transmitting funds. In any case, Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland plans to introduce legislation so that crowdfunding platforms continue to register with and report to FINTRAC after the emergency ends.

Once FINTRAC receives information on convoy donations from crowdfunding platforms, it analyzes the information and passes it on to law enforcement agencies like the RCMP. Law enforcement authorities are responsible for freezing the funds associated with these donations, not FINTRAC.

What happens to the seized funds depends on the legal proceedings that follow, but convoy donors could lose their donations forever. This possibility is aimed at deterring new donations.

Will foreign platforms comply?

What isn’t clear yet is whether foreign crowdfunding platforms are complying with the new requirement to register with and report to FINTRAC (if they collect donations for the convoy), and, if they don’t, how they’ll be sanctioned.

For this reason, blocking access to financial services used by the convoy’s organizers and associates has probably been more effective at starving the protests of funds. The emergency economic measures require financial institutions, payments platforms, funding platforms, digital currency exchanges, etc., to stop doing business with anyone directly or indirectly associated with the convoy.

This includes freezing their accounts for the emergency’s duration. The measures also cover those who provide in-kind contributions to the convoy, like food or gas.

Fear of losing access to their money, even if only for a few weeks, should keep people and businesses away from the convoy and its activities. But law enforcement authorities must play their part.

First, they must collect the names of people and companies associated with the convoy and pass them on to entities providing financial services in Canada (so accounts can be frozen). Second, they need to ensure that sanctions are imposed on anyone in the financial system who does not abide by the Emergency Economic Measures Order.

After that, the only way for the convoy movement to survive would be to conduct its entire business in cash. But with accounts in Canada frozen, where would the cash come from? It isn’t likely to come from converting Bitcoins collected for the convoy into cash because it’s too difficult to do without going through traditional financial institutions.

Cash would have to come from abroad, especially the United States, where accounts cannot be frozen. Already, anyone bringing more than $10,000 in any form into Canada must declare it. And border officials have likely been extra-vigilant about cash entering the country in the past few days.

The backbone of the convoy’s activities was its access to a steady flow of financing from donors both domestic and foreign. By deterring convoy supporters and participants, the federal government made it easier for law enforcement to bring a relatively peaceful end to an unprecedented crisis in Canada.

This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit news site dedicated to sharing ideas from academic experts.

Read more:

The end of the ‘freedom convoy’ in Ottawa: Why rejoicing when occupiers get arrested isn’t the answer

Anti-vax protest or insurrection? Making sense of the ‘freedom convoy’ protest

Patrick Leblond is affiliated with the Centre for International Governance Innovation and the Centre interuniversitaire de recherche en analyse des organisations (CIRANO).

Costanza Musu receives funding from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council. (SSHRC)

Most bank accounts frozen under the Emergencies Act are being released, committee hears

Peter Zimonjic - 
cbc.ca

More than 200 bank accounts worth nearly $8 million were frozen when the federal government used emergency powers to end a massive protest occupation of downtown Ottawa.


© Scott Olson/Getty Images

A Department of Finance official went before a House of Commons committee to explain the financial measures deployed against convoy protest organizers under the Emergencies Act.

Federal officials report most of the accounts are now in the process of being released, a parliamentary committee heard Tuesday.

Isabelle Jacques, assistant deputy minister of finance, told a committee of MPs that up to 210 bank accounts holding about $7.8 million were frozen under the financial measures contained in the Emergencies Act.

"Information was shared by the RCMP with financial institutions and we were informed yesterday by financial institutions that they were unfreezing the accounts," she said.

"The vast majority of accounts are in the process of being unfrozen, subject to any new information that the RCMP may have."

Jacques said that because accounts are being released now, the number of accounts affected and their total dollar value continues to decrease by the day.

She also said the fact that more than 200 bank accounts were frozen did not necessarily mean that more than 200 people lost access to their funds. Jacques said that individuals may have held more than one account affected by the measures.

Some Conservative MPs have said constituents have reported that their bank accounts were frozen after they made donations to the convoy protest through one of its crowdfunding campaigns.

In a statement released Monday, the RCMP said it only provided banks with the names of convoy organizers and the owners of trucks who had refused to leave the protest area. The RCMP said it did not release an exhaustive list of every donation made.

"At no time did we provide a list of donors to financial institutions," the statement said.
Small donors unlikely to be affected: official

Jacques said that the financial measures in the Emergencies Act came into force on Feb. 15 and were specifically designed to apply enough financial pressure to convince protest organizers and participants to go home.

"Based on the knowledge that I have, I think it would be unlikely that someone who gave … $20 three weeks ago, or even $20 post Feb. 15, that they would have been captured by a freeze," she said.

"It's not impossible in view of the order, but in view of the exchange of information and the focused approach that was taken to stop the illegal funding of these activities, it would appear to be unlikely that this occurred, but not impossible."

She said the measures should not affect anyone who provided financial support to the convoy before Feb. 15. Jacques said that anyone who saw their account frozen and who subsequently left the blockade area should expect to see the account unfrozen in the coming days.




Since the Emergencies Act was invoked, the Liberal government has been asked to explain what specific powers the act provides that did not already exist under conventional Canadian law.

Jacques told MPs that before the Emergencies Act was invoked, FINTRAC — Canada's financial intelligence unit — could not police the movement of money through some crowdfunding websites and some payment service providers.

She also said that while the federal government does have the power to freeze bank accounts in certain limited circumstances without using the Emergencies Act — in cases of suspected terrorism or financial crimes, for example — it did not do so in this instance.

"There's no other venues to freeze the accounts in view of the … illegal blockades that were ongoing," she said.


EDCNS board member donated to 'Freedom Convoy'


The release of donors to the controversial truck convoy protests indicates about two dozen North Simcoe residents donated to the cause.

Included in the list obtained by MidlandToday are ShopCity entrepreneur Colin Pape, who donated $25 with the note 'Go truckers, go!' and Adrian Sauvageot, one of six community representatives on the Economic Development Corporation of North Simcoe (EDCNS) board of directors, volunteering since May of 2020 for the role.


The not-for-profit EDCNS organization advocates for business attraction and retention in the towns of Penetanguishene and Midland and the townships of Tay and Tiny.

On February 5, Sauvageot donated $32 to Freedom Convoy 2022 through the GiveSendGo crowdfunding platform website, a fundraising campaign which was publicly exposed by hackers earlier this week to reveal the names, postal codes, email addresses, and donation payments and methods of donors to the cause.

During the pandemic lockdowns of April 2021, Sauvageot advertised a Penetanguishene rental property on Airbnb, asking visitors on his Facebook page: “Are you looking for a weekend getaway where you can discover what it's like to live in a communist country?”

As recently as December 21 of last year, Sauvageot’s social media included a Facebook post stating, “This new round of lockdowns will be the final nail in the coffin for many businesses, both small and large. RIP Canadian Business…” A post made a day earlier stated, “Justin Trudeau is a criminal who should be charged for his crimes against Canada.”

MidlandToday reached Sauvageot by phone for comment.

He confirmed that the $32 USD GiveSendGo donation – a doubled amount from his previously-cancelled $20 CAD GoFundMe donation – was never hidden, and he had donated to the cause of “ending government mandates by removing their overreach."

“I’ve been public about it since the beginning and all I’ve had is a lot of support from a lot of locals,” said Sauvageot, adding that “the community that rallies around the freedom convoy is being distorted by legacy media” in coverage.

When asked of the role of community representative for the EDCNS, Sauvageot responded: “Our role is to promote businesses and try to find investments both national and international to come into the area.”

Of Penetanguishene being within a communist country, he felt the comment didn’t reflect his EDCNS position. “It’s a joke made out of a jest against the current government and their policies.

“I believe the Prime Minister has broken several laws, and while I don’t believe in overthrowing the government by any means, I think he needs to be held accountable for the several laws he has broken since he has been in power,” providing the 2019 corruption scandal involving SNC-Lavalin Group Inc. as one example.

Sauvageot noted that the views of the EDCNS didn’t impact his own personal views.

“EDCNS is a grouping of a lot of individuals with different views, and we constantly have debates within EDCNS which creates for a very good, strong democratic approach to how we can improve our economy locally. And I would hope that the federal government could learn something from how municipalities act in the democratic process to better themselves,” Sauvageot replied.

MidlandToday contacted EDCNS director Sharon Vegh and Pape for comment, but didn't receive a response in time for publication.

Recently, the tangible metrics of the EDCNS were brought to the interest of Midland council during their ask for approximately $169,000 in the 2022 draft budget discussions, approved by council on the praise of several members who promoted the organization; a similar request for financial records was made a year prior.

Derek Howard, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter, MidlandToday.ca
TEXAS NORTH; ALBERTA, USA

Look West: Criminal anthropologist says Alberta at heart of unrest, protests


CALGARY — A criminal anthropologist suggests looking to the West to find the heart of protests and blockades that gripped the nation for more than a month.

Alberta appears to have been the epicentre of unrest that started with truckers over cross-border vaccine mandates, but quickly attracted other groups with their own agendas. Most prominent were demands to lift all pandemic public health measures, complaints about the federal Liberal government and rallying cries for freedom.

Two people arrested for leading the noisy three-week standoff in downtown Ottawa call Alberta home. A third is from Saskatchewan.

There are 13 people with alleged violent motives facing serious charges in relation to the southern Alberta border blockade at Coutts. Four are accused of conspiracy to commit murder of RCMP officers.

Another convoy destined for Ottawa originated in northern Alberta, but was turned away at the Manitoba-Ontario boundary in recent days, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said Monday.

Cathy Prowse, a criminal anthropologist as well as a 25-year Calgary police veteran, said Alberta's economy and way of life have been hit hard by COVID-19, which has created a wellspring of dissent.

"We've had trouble getting oil to market. We've had farmers that haven't got enough feed for their cattle," said Prowse. "Displacement is huge here. Probably as bad as, if not worse, than any part of the country."

Prowse added there are other pockets in Canada, such as Quebec, that are seeing similar swells of discontent.

She said there are three camps participating in what participants are calling "freedom convoys."



The least harmful, she said, are people who see freedom as the right to choose whether to be vaccinated and to bypass restrictions based on faith or personal beliefs. The second group, often termed extremists, seeks freedom from government and the rule of law.

But, Prowse said, possibly the most dangerous are those who have been socially isolated during the pandemic and are connecting with others through participation in the protests.

"There's some in there who ... are going to crave this affiliation. They're going to want more," she said.

"There's always a potential for spillover into more extremist groups."

A review of donations made through a crowdfunding website to support the convoys shows some of the most common words used by supporters were "freedom," "God" and "tyranny."

Public Safety Minister Marco Mendicino has said the arrests at the border protest in Alberta speak to a larger problem in Canada. Some people who were in Coutts have strong ties to a far-right extremist organization led out of Ottawa, he said, although he did not name it.

Emily Laidlaw, a Canada Research Chair in cybersecurity law, said the demonstrations show the slow burn stoked on social media by misinformation — which can be partially true — and disinformation, which is more intentional in nature.

"It just veers off into territory that is just having such widespread influence," said Laidlaw. "That's when you lose control of it and ... you see movements like this."

She gave as an example a video circulated online that shows a police officer giving an incorrect interpretation of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which people then view as fact.

There are also conflicting videos and photos from the protests on social media. Some show peaceful demonstrations, while others reveal criminal behaviour or hateful symbols, including the Nazi swastika and Confederate flag claimed by extremist groups.

An RCMP raid in Coutts seized long guns, handguns, a machete, a large quantity of ammunition and body armour. Two confiscated tactical vests had badges related to a neo-fascist movement and another possible hate group.

"What we're seeing now is the undermining of trust in the institutions that we would normally turn to for information and, so, there's no sense of what's true anymore," said Laidlaw.

Social media pages under the same names as several of the accused in Coutts have shared conspiracy theories, complaints about the government and inaccurate COVID-19 information.

Laidlaw said, from a legal perspective, Canada is entirely dependent on social media platforms to self-regulate. But despite efforts, that type of information continues to spread.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Feb. 23, 2022.

— With files from Bob Weber in Edmonton

Alanna Smith, The Canadian Press
Homelessness set to soar in England amid cost of living crisis

Rise in number of sofa surfers expected to drive the increase as councils warn of ‘tidal wave’ of need


More than 66,000 more people will become homeless by 2024, according to the housing charity Crisis. 
Photograph: Maureen McLean/REX/Shutterstock


Robert Booth 
Social affairs correspondent
THE GUARDIAN
Tue 22 Feb 2022 

The number of people homeless in England is predicted to jump by a third by 2024 as councils warn of a “tidal wave” of need caused by benefits freezes, soaring food and energy bills and the end of Covid eviction bans.

More than 66,000 more people will be homeless by 2024, with the bulk of the increase being among people forced to “sofa surf”, according to annual forecasts by the housing charity Crisis and Heriot-Watt University. There will be 8,000 more people rough sleeping and 9,000 people forced into unsuitable temporary accommodation.


One pay packet away from the streets: the workers who became homeless in the pandemic


The chief executive of Crisis, Matt Downie, described the findings as “a huge cause for concern”, as a survey of 155 English councils also found that nine out of 10 town halls expect to see an increase in evictions from private rented homes over the next year. Eight out of 10 fear increases in homeless children.

“We are expecting a tidal wave, to put it mildly,” an official at one council in southern England told the researchers. “It is going to be a very, very busy couple of years.”

Councils in London, where living costs are highest, are predicting the biggest surge.

The bleak projections come as government measures to prevent homelessness during the pandemic unwind. Core homelessness in England – a concept which captures the most acute forms of homelessness – is estimated to have totalled 203,400 in 2020, down 5% on 2019 levels.

This was primarily due to the widely praised “Everyone In” initiative during the pandemic which saw rough sleepers housed in hotels. But this measure is now predicted to rise to 270,000 by 2024 and reach close to 300,000 by 2036, unless further countermeasures are taken.

Evictions slumped during the pandemic, as ministers paused court proceedings, but are now increasing again. There were more than 14,000 possession claims between October and December last year, a 42% rise on the previous quarter.

Energy price rises this spring forecast at over 40% will hit single-adult households on low incomes hardest. They could be forced to spend 54% of their income on bills compared with 6% for a middle-income family, according to estimates by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation.

“It doesn’t have to be like this,” said Downie. “The protections put in place during the pandemic helped thousands of people off the streets and prevented many more from facing homelessness. It would be shameful for this progress to unravel before us, at a huge human cost and a financial one for the local councils left to foot the bill.”

In December, the government announced a £316m homelessness prevention fund for councils for the next financial year that it said would protect tens of thousands of people from homelessness. It was welcomed by Crisis and the founder of the Big Issue, John Bird.

But Crisis is calling on the government to further increase the Local Housing Allowance – the amount the state will pay to cover rent for people on benefits – so it truly covers the cost of rent across the country. The allowance was rebased at 30% of market rents in spring 2020 but was frozen from April 2021.

It also repeated its call for more social housing to be built. Only 5,955 new homes for the cheapest social rents were provided in England 2020/21, down from nearly 40,000 a year a decade ago.

A Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities spokesperson said: “Government interventions have prevented almost 450,000 households from becoming homeless since 2017.

“This year, councils have been given an extra £65 million to support low income households with rent arrears.

“We’re also banning no-fault evictions, and a £316 million homelessness prevention grant will help people who are homeless or at risk of losing their home to find a new one, get help with evictions or move into temporary accommodation.”
#ABOLISHICE
Toyota and Yamaha are developing a hydrogen-fueled V8 engine

Anmar Frangoul - 

Yamaha Motor says the 5.0-liter V8 engine will be developed for automobiles and based on the one used by the Lexus RC F coupe.

Yamaha Motor President Yoshihiro Hidaka says the firm has "a strong passion for and level of commitment to the internal combustion engine."

While there is excitement about the potential of hydrogen's use in cars, high-profile figures within the industry such as Elon Musk have taken a different view.



© Provided by CNBCA Yamaha Motor Co., V8 hydrogen engine displayed in Japan, on Saturday, Nov. 13, 2021.

Toyota has commissioned Yamaha Motor to develop a hydrogen-fueled engine, with the president of the latter stating that his company was committed to the internal combustion engine.

In an announcement toward the end of last week, Yamaha said the 5.0-liter V8 engine would be developed for automobiles and based on the one used by the Lexus RC F coupe, with alterations made to its cylinder heads and injectors, among other things.

According to Yamaha, the unit is able to deliver as much as 450 horsepower at 6,800 revolutions per minute. The company said it had been working on a hydrogen engine for automobiles for roughly five years.

Yamaha Motor President Yoshihiro Hidaka said that while his company was aiming to achieve carbon neutrality by the year 2050 it also had "a strong passion for and level of commitment to the internal combustion engine."



"Hydrogen engines house the potential to be carbon-neutral while keeping our passion for the internal combustion engine alive at the same time," Hidaka went on to say.

Last week's statement builds on one from Nov. 2021 when Yamaha Motor, Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Toyota, Subaru and Mazda released details of what they described as a "challenge to expand fuel options for using internal combustion engines." It was at this announcement that the V8 engine developed for Toyota was shown to the public.

The notion of powering an internal combustion engine with hydrogen is not a new one. Toyota has already developed a GR Yaris which has a 1.6-liter ICE and uses hydrogen as its fuel.

According to the company, the GR Yaris uses the same powertrain as a hydrogen-powered Corolla Sport. The firm has labeled both of these vehicles as "experimental."

Firms such as BMW have also produced vehicles such as the BMW Hydrogen 7. According to the German automaker, the Hydrogen 7 used an internal combustion engine and was able to run on gasoline or liquid hydrogen. Production of the vehicle began in 2006 and a limited run was made.

Using hydrogen to power an internal combustion engine is different to hydrogen fuel cell technology, where gas from a tank mixes with oxygen, producing electricity. As the U.S. Department of Energy's Alternative Fuels Data Center notes, fuel cell vehicles emit "only water vapor and warm air."

By contrast, hydrogen ICEs do produce emissions. "Hydrogen engines release near zero, trace amounts of CO2 … but can produce nitrogen oxides, or NOx," Cummins, the engine maker, says.

Hydrogen ICEs are also "less efficient" compared to fuel cell electric vehicles, according to the Alternative Fuels Data Center.


While there is excitement about the potential of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles and companies such as Hyundai, BMW and Toyota have all developed cars based on the technology, others within the industry have taken a different view.

In June 2020, Tesla CEO Elon Musk tweeted "fuel cells = fool sells," adding in July of that year: "hydrogen fool sells make no sense."

In February 2021, the CEO of Germany's Volkswagen Group also weighed in on the subject. "It's time for politicians to accept science," Herbert Diess tweeted.

"Green hydrogen is needed for steel, chemical, aero … and should not end up in cars. Far too expensive, inefficient, slow and difficult to rollout and transport. After all: no #hydrogen cars in sight."




An ex-Trump aide said a White House gathering with Justice Clarence Thomas' wife, Ginni Thomas, was 'the craziest meeting I've ever been to'
Ginni Thomas, the wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, arrives to watch Judge Amy Coney Barrett take the constitutional oath on the South Lawn of the White House on October 26, 2020. 
AP Photo/Patrick Semansky

An ex-Trump aide called a meeting between the former president and Ginni Thomas as the "craziest" meeting he'd ever attended.

Thomas, the wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, is a longtime conservative activist.

As Trump sought to court the justice, Ginni Thomas saw her opening, per a NYT Magazine report.

An aide to former President Donald Trump described a 2019 White House gathering with the then-president and Ginni Thomas, the wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, as the "craziest" meeting he'd ever attended, according to The New York Times Magazine.

Ginni Thomas — an attorney and conservative activist — has been in the political trenches with right-leaning leaders for decades. Her influence is so valued among conservative activists — and Justice Thomas — that she even came to the White House for what was supposed to be a private lunch between Trump and her husband, according to the magazine.

Leonard Leo, the former executive vice president of the conservative Federalist Society, told the magazine that Trump sought to cultivate a relationship with Justice Thomas once he realized the immense popularity of the jurist among the Republican base, creating an opening for Ginni Thomas with the then-president.

The magazine also detailed newly-reported ties between Ginni Thomas and organizers of a January 6, 2021 rally in support of Trump, along with efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election results, in which Joe Biden oust the former president in a decisive 306-232 Electoral College victory.

According to nine former Trump aides and advisors, who spoke to the magazine anonymously, the ensuing meetings with Ginni Thomas created a sense of confusion among the staffers.

Several of the staffers were unsure of Ginni Thomas' role and wondered if she was speaking as an activist or as a paid consultant, while also highlighting her insistence on promoting far-right candidates for positions within the Trump administration, per the magazine.

"Here's what the peeps think," she stated in the meetings of the GOP base, according to an aide. "We have to listen to the peeps."

Ginni Thomas' hard-driving style alienated several of the aides so much that they assembled an opposition report on her, with one of the staffers describing her as a "wrecking ball."

In January 2019, Ginni Thomas met with Trump at the White House alongside select members of her conservative group, Groundswell, where a Trump aide described the nature of the conversation in unflattering terms.

"It was the craziest meeting I've ever been to," he told the magazine. "She started by leading the prayer."

Later, the aide said that conservative attendees spoke disparagingly of "the transsexual agenda" and parents "chopping off their children's breasts."

According to the aide, Trump "tried to rein it in" but "it was hard to hear" because members of the group were praying out loud during the conversation.

Later, some key details of the White House meeting leaked, and Ginni Thomas' advocacy against transgender rights made headlines.

In the past, she has used inflammatory language against transgender Americans, saying the country is under threat by the "fascist left," which she said includes "transsexual fascists."

In the meeting, Ginni Thomas and other attendees also lamented that several conservative candidates to their liking had been stymied from assuming several roles, while advocating for the Trump administration's personnel office to be swept of "Never Trump" Republicans.