Friday, May 13, 2022

For widows in Africa, COVID-19 stole husbands, homes, future

LONG READ

By KRISTA LARSON and CHINEDU ASADU
May 10, 2022 

UMUIDA, Nigeria (AP) — As Anayo Mbah went into labor with her sixth child, her husband battled COVID-19 in another hospital across town. Jonas, a young motorcycle taxi driver, had been placed on oxygen after he started coughing up blood.

Jonas would never meet his daughter, Chinaza. Hours after the birth, Mbah’s sister-in-law called to say he was gone. Staff at the hospital in southeastern Nigeria soon asked Mbah and her newborn to leave. No one had come to pay her bill.

Mbah began the rites of widowhood at the home where she lived with her in-laws: Her head was shaved, and she was dressed in white clothing. But just weeks into the mourning period that traditionally lasts six months, her late husband’s relatives stopped providing food, then confronted her directly.

“They told me that it was better for me to find my own way,” Mbah, now 29, said. “They said even if I have to go and remarry, that I should do so. That the earlier I leave the house, the better for me and my children.”

She left on foot for her mother’s home with only a plastic bag of belongings for Chinaza and her other children.

“I decided that I might die if I continue to stay here with my children,” she said.

Across Africa, widowhood has long befallen great numbers of women — particularly in the continent’s least developed countries where medical facilities are scarce. Many widows are young, having married men decades older. And in some countries, men frequently have more than one wife, leaving several widows behind when they die.

Now, the coronavirus pandemic has created an even larger population of widows on the continent, with African men far more likely to die of the virus than women, and it has exacerbated the issues they face. Women such as Mbah say the pandemic has taken more than their husbands: In their widowhood, it’s cost them their extended families, their homes and their futures.

___

This story is part of a yearlong series on how the pandemic is impacting women in Africa, most acutely in the least developed countries. The Associated Press series is funded by the European Journalism Centre’s European Development Journalism Grants program, which is supported by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. The AP is responsible for all content.

___

Once widowed, women are often mistreated and disinherited. Laws prohibit many from acquiring land or give them only a fraction of their spouse’s wealth, and widows in places like southeastern Nigeria face suspicion over their husband’s death during the mourning period. In-laws can claim custody of children; tradition says kids belong to the father. Other in-laws disown the children and refuse to help, even if they’re the family’s only source of money and food. And young widows have no adult children to support them in communities with extreme poverty and few jobs for women with limited education.

In Nigeria, Africa’s most populous nation, some 70 percent of confirmed COVID-19 deaths have been men, according to data tracked by the Sex, Gender and COVID-19 Project. Similarly, more than 70 percent of deaths in Chad, Malawi, Somalia and Congo have been men, according to figures from the project, which is the world’s largest database tracking coronavirus differences between men and women. Other countries likely show similar trends but lack the resources to gather detailed figures.

Experts say some of the widows left behind have nothing while others are pressured to remarry brothers-in-law or be cut off. Widows can start experiencing mistreatment by their in-laws before their husbands are even buried.

“Some are treated as outcasts, accused of being responsible for the death of their husband,” said Egodi Blessing Igwe, spokeswoman for WomenAid Collective, which has aided thousands of widows with free legal services and family mediation.

Some experts say widows face the harshest reality in Nigeria. There, Mbah now raises her children without financial support from her in-laws, who even kept the motorcycle her husband drove as a taxi. She works four jobs, including one as a cleaner at a school where she can no longer afford to send her children.

Her husband had no will, and she hasn’t pursued a legal case against her in-laws. She fears it would only make her situation worse, and finding the time would be nearly impossible.

For some widows who purse legal action, a will saves the day, said Igwe, with the women’s rights organization.

“The will can really help if men can have the courage to prepare it and continue to update it,” she said. “Unfortunately in this part of the world, we don’t like to talk about death.”

Even in widowhood, women are often still under the oversight of men — adult sons or brothers — and may not be able to pursue a case if the family believes it will bring stigma or shame.

In Congo, Vanessa Emedy Kamana had known her husband for a decade before he proposed marriage. She worked for the scholar as a personal assistant. By the time their friendship turned romantic, Godefroid Kamana was in his late 60s; she, a single mother in her late 20s. She said she was drawn to his youthful spirit and intellect: He worked at a think tank and had two doctorates from European universities.

When he first tested positive for COVID-19, there was no hospital bed for him, despite his age and status as a diabetic, in the eastern city of Goma, a humanitarian hub with a large U.N. peacekeeping mission presence. Once a spot was secured, his wife spent most of his final days searching for oxygen and pleading with vendors.

The night of his burial, relatives came to the family home where Kamana had just begun her period of mourning. Generally, widows are required to stay in their homes and can receive visitors. Mourning lengths vary by religion and ethnic group. Kamana, whose family is Muslim, was supposed to stay home for four months and 10 days. But her husband’s relatives didn’t wait that long to force her and her young son out on the street.

“I was stripped of everything, of all my possessions,” she said.

She feared her husband’s family would seek custody of her son, Jamel, whom Kamana had adopted and given his surname. Ultimately the relatives did not, because the boy — now 6 — wasn’t his biological child. They did, however, move swiftly to amass the financial assets.

“I was not aware because I was at the house crying for my husband,” she said. “But they came and said: ’These bank accounts belong to us.”

She, her son and their cat now live in a smaller home her mother kept as a rental property. Kamana sells secondhand clothing at a market while her son is at school. And while she initially received 40% of her late husband’s salary, those funds will soon stop entirely.

Kamana’s marriage was relatively new. He had paid the dowry to her family in 2020, but they had no public ceremony because of COVID-19 restrictions. What mattered most, she said, was that he had accepted her son as his own. Now, the family has taken a bank account set up for the boy.

And it’s painful, Kamana said, when some of her late husband’s relatives insist they’ve lost more than she did.

“No one will be able to replace him,” she said.

In West Africa, widowhood is particularly fraught in the large swaths where many marriages are polygamous. Each wife performs the rituals of grief, but it is the first wife or her children who usually lay claim to the family home and other financial assets.

Saliou Diallo, 35, said she would have been left with nothing after a decade of marriage had her husband not thought to put her home under her name instead of his. Even after his death, she lives in fear that her husband’s older children or relatives will try to take over her small residence on the outskirts of the Guinean capital, Conakry.

Under Guinean law, a man’s multiple wives share a small percentage of his estate, with nearly all of it — 87.5 percent — going to his children, said Yansane Fatou Balde, a women’s rights advocate. Women rarely contest their inheritance, given the stigma and expense.

Diallo’s husband, El Hadj, 74, had been building the home just for her and their 4-year-old daughter when he fell ill with COVID-19. Diallo was infected, too — and terrified. She already knew the burden of losing a spouse: At 13, she became a second wife, only to be widowed in her early 20s.

Her next attempt at marriage unraveled when the man did not take to her three children. Then she was introduced to El Hadj, who already had married multiple women but was willing to raise Diallo’s three kids as his own.

They spent a decade together before the virus hit El Hadj. In his final conversations with his wife, he lamented that her home didn’t have windows yet. That he hadn’t lived long enough to build a well so she wouldn’t have to carry water on her head each day. That other relatives would try to chase her off once he was gone.

During mourning, the first wife refused to provide financially for Diallo — who couldn’t attend the funeral because she tested positive for the virus. Then the first wife’s children came to Diallo’s house and reclaimed the car he’d given her. They took all his documents and checkbooks.
Full Coverage: Women Eyes of Africa

“They wanted to chase me away, too,” Diallo said. “I told them: ‘Let me finish my mourning and see my husband’s grave.’”

The children asked for the papers of the house El Hadj had built for her. She provided photocopies but secretly kept the originals.

Her extended family ultimately helped raise money to put windows on her house. Still, she feels her husband’s absence. There is electricity, but no light fixtures. The walls are finished but not painted, and only a few plastic lawn chairs and a mini-fridge furnish the home.

“I am sure God is saving a surprise for me. I surrender to him,” she said. “In the meantime I live on the help of my parents. They support me, and I keep my faith.”

In Diallo’s case, the law has protected her home. But where laws fail to protect widows, the resolution of disinheritance disputes often comes down to family mediation alone.

Back in Nigeria, Roseline Ujah, 49, spent three decades as part of her husband’s extended family. She shared chores and meals with them, even helping to care for her mother- and father-in-law in their later years.

But she said her husband’s brother began scheming to disinherit her and her seven children before her husband, Godwin, had even been buried. Her sister-in-law intervened and managed to save a small portion of land where Ujah now cultivates cocoyam, a root vegetable.

When her husband — who harvested palm wine — first became ill, everyone assumed it was malaria. But medications failed, and his breathing became labored. Hospital doctors diagnosed him with COVID-19, even though no tests were available for confirmation. Without money for a hospital stay, Ujah turned to traditional medicine.

“I kept begging God not to let him die,” she said. “He kept getting weaker and weaker, and we were looking for solutions for him.” He died in their home and was buried in his front yard.

Only her sister-in-law brought food to the family during their six months of mourning. Ujah was forbidden to leave home. Without support from her extended family, she had to send her children to work on neighbors’ farms for income. Some days they ate nothing at all.

“It was only from the door that I could call the attention of passersby to help me get something at the market,” she said.

Godwin’s youngest two children — 13-year-old Chidimma and 11-year-old Chimuanya — have been especially affected by his death, as their relationship with their father’s family has soured.

Ujah is left to scramble for her family’s survival, making brooms to sell at the local market. She knows her husband would have confronted his family over their mistreatment of her. Without him, she turns to her faith.

“I look up to God, telling him I have no one else,” she said. “He is my husband and the father of my children and of the family, and I will not marry another man.”

__

Larson also reported from Goma, Congo, and Conakry, Guinea. Associated Press writer Boubacar Diallo in Conakry, Guinea, contributed.

___

See the full series on how the pandemic is affecting women in Africa: https://apnews.com/hub/women-the-eyes-of-africa
Health Care Workers Are Moving to Gig Work in Record Numbers

Nearly one-fifth of hospitals in the U.S. have critical staffing shortages, as burned out health care workers leave medicine.


Photo: Unsplash

COVID-19 has battered the health care workforce. Historically known for their resilience, the pandemic has left doctors, nurses and other front-line workers not just exhausted, but bitter, traumatized and questioning their passion and commitment to a calling they once loved. In search of greater work-life balance and mental well-being, many are considering major changes to their work-life, from moving to gig work to leaving the profession altogether, quantified by the overall growth of ~6% per annum of the temporary staffing market.



This burnout has had a severe impact across the health care continuum. In January 2022, nearly one-fifth of hospitals in the U.S. claimed “critical” staffing shortages, while nearly 60% of nursing homes nationwide were forced to limit admissions in December 2021 due to a lack of staff. Health care executives, equally exhausted after spending over two years managing a mounting series of COVID driven crises, are aggressively trying to address workforce burnout with traditional monetary levers (e.g., pay raises and bonuses). These actions have had material downstream affects: a ~16% increase in labor operating expenses has contributed to a median operating margin ~10% lower than pre-pandemic norms, with over one-third of U.S. hospitals operating in the red by late 2021.

Staffing shortages have a significant impact on patient safety, too, including greater reliance on workarounds, which can lead to near misses. In fact, ECRI named staffing shortages as its top patient safety concern for 2022.



Oliver Wyman research suggests that traditional and more transactional levers (such as pay hikes) do not address the root cause of burnout and can be “too little, too late” for affected workers. Nursing staff responding to a recent Oliver Wyman survey ranked attention to their mental health and a focus on work-life balance as their top worries for working in health care rather than adequate pay or benefits. Despite the lucrative financial opportunities available to most health care workers in today’s market, our recent survey of nursing and allied health professionals suggested 20% to 30% have accelerated retirement plans, with 50% to 60% planning to change their career in some way, including a significant portion (15% to 30%) planning to pursue a career outside of health care all together.

Our survey illuminated an alternative path forward for smart and self-reflective leaders who are willing to address the core issues that matter most to this workforce. This requires abandoning the traditional HR-centric approach in favor of shifting an organization’s culture and strategy to reflect the new realities of today’s workforce. Organizations that transform care delivery, build flexibility into formerly rigid jobs, and demonstrate a clear investment into the emotional well-being of their employees will be the ones that successfully build back better. We have to understand what has driven the current staffing crisis, and what can be done to bring back workers who have left, as well as retaining those who have stayed.
Front-Line Workers Want More Control Over Their Own Career

A core component of this change (one that Oliver Wyman expects to persist) is the shift to gig labor, with our recent Nursing Survey revealing 1400% growth in the number of nurses moving to gig models — traveler, day-agency and other types of per diem — since the start of the pandemic. Nurses are seeking greater control over their schedules and the greater flexibility that comes with shifting to gig work — a model where nurses can control their work-life balance and prioritize the volume, duration, location, and timing of shifts they take. Beyond greater job flexibility and higher wages, nurses tend to perceive that they are better taken care of by staffing agencies that do not “push” them to work over time. “My employer didn’t have my back during the pandemic. At least my staffing company has my back and I have control over when I work,” one nurse told us.

This trend has resulted in a complex feedback loop, where nurses who have stayed in traditional staff roles can feel frustration and resentment that what they perceive as loyalty to their institutions is rewarded with nothing but lower wages, worse shift schedules, and generally poorer work-lives than their colleagues who have shifted to gig-work. “Every week I would look over at the nurse next to me, making three times as much while doing the exact same job,” said an ICU nurse who made the shift to travel contracts during the pandemic. “Now I can take a month off in between contracts, control where I live and work, and get paid more for the privilege.”



There’s every indication that these trendlines will continue. Few respondents to Oliver Wyman’s nursing study expect their work life, including staffing levels, to stabilize anytime soon. In fact, demand for health care workers rose +105%, +164%, and +60% across nursing care, community care, and home health respectively compared to pre-pandemic levels, with elevated demand projected to persist through at least 2024.


Supervisors and Leaders Need to ‘Have the Back’ of Their Workforce

As mentioned above, mental health, physical health and work-life balance ranked higher than pay when nursing respondents were asked about their greatest concerns about working in health care. They cited work-life balance, emotional demands and flexible scheduling as key drivers in why they would consider leaving their organization.

During interviews with more than 100 nursing professionals, the overwhelming majority noted that their employers have historically shown little regard for these factors. “I left my full-time role because the responsibilities kept piling up and I just wasn’t getting support from the hospital,” said one critical care nurse. The nursing workforce unsurprisingly desires connection and a supervisor who “has their back” and will advocate for them, but the culture of many health care organizations has failed them.

This concern is persistent across generations, with both Baby Boomers and Gen Z ranking work-life balance as their top concern working in health care. While the Millennials and Gen X were more concerned with mental health, these are simply two sides of the same coin: Addressing both requires viewing health care workers as whole people, not just cogs in an uncaring machine of a hospital.


Money Is a Driver, but Workers Need Connection

While pay showed up as a key criteria when considering potential employers across all segments in our survey, it is important to understand that compensation alone is not enough. Health care professionals want “fair compensation.” Unpacking this language, we learned that this means the ability to cover everyday needs, ensure their family is cared for and adequately plan for the next five years. Nursing professionals want to feel that their employers care and are interested in helping them achieve their goals. It’s not just about getting paid at a high rate, but also about being supported — e.g., an employer helping to pay bills or student loans, support continuing education, plan for retirement, and other services that aren’t necessarily conveyed through a number on a paystub.

The health care workforce is in crisis, and with it the health care system overall. Health care executives need to take truly transformative steps to save it. They can continually ask their workforces what matters to them and take action on what employees say is consequential. They can upend traditional approaches to recruitment, use apps to facilitate more flexible scheduling options, invest in more remote work options and strategically use gig workers. Health care organizations can change their cultures at a foundational level and change the relationships they have with their nurses, doctors, and other front-line workers who sacrificed so much throughout this pandemic. What’s at stake is the very health of our communities.



Deirdre Baggot
Partner of Health & Life Sciences at Oliver Wyman

Bruce Hamory
Partner and Chief Medical Officer at Oliver Wyman

John Rudoy
Healthcare Director at Marsh McLennan Advantage
Austria’s governing far-right FPO compares immigrants to rats



The group, which was founded by former Nazis, published a poem in Hitler’s home town of Braunau, warning of cultural mixing.

The Freedom Party of Austria (FPO), which is part of Austria’s governing-coalition, has published a poem comparing migrants to rats.

The piece, titled “The City Rat” (Die Stadtratte) was published in the northwestern town of Braunau, where Nazi leader Adolf Hitler was born.

Shared by the town’s local chapter, the poem warns against cultural intermingling in Austria and included the lines: "As we live down here, so must the rats, as guests or migrants, even those we did not know yet, share our way of life, or hurry away!"

It continues to warn of the dangers of cultural mixing and of government efforts to assimilate minorities.

The imagery of a rat was also used in Nazi propaganda to describe Jews in the run up to the Holocaust.

The FPO is closely linked to the European Identitarian movement, which inspired the Christchurch terrorist attack, and has its roots in the Nazi movement.

Head of the Freedom Party (FPOe) Heinz-Christian Strache (L) and head of the People's Party (OeVP) Sebastian Kurz address a news conference in Vienna, Austria, December 15, 2017. (Reuters)

The FPO’s SS founders

Founded in 1956, the FPO originally served as a gathering place for former Nazis and its first two chairmen, Anton Reinthaller (1956-58) and Friedrich Peter (1958-78) were former SS officers.

Until the 1980s, theFPO was a marginal party following a nationalist agenda, but from 1986 onwards, the party framed itself as a far-right, anti-elite, and populist party.

The party became a coalition partner with the Christian Democratic centre-right OVP in 2000, the first time a party with Nazi roots had joined government in Europe since the Second World War.

FPO’s appointment as a coalition partner was opposed by the EU, and the party did not attain enough votes to join the coalition in the next election. However, it rejoined government in 2017, after attaining 26 percent of the vote, riding a wave of anti-Muslim and anti-immigrant sentiment.

The sign of Braunau am Inn, the city Hitler was born, is pictured on a bridge, Austria, October 22, 2016. (Reuters)

Anti-Muslim sentiment


“The party leaders of course declare that they have nothing to do with the Nazis and so on. Even if we were to accept that, nobody can deny that the so-called neo-Nazis find a home under the FPO today,” Mustafa Isık a local Muslim active in civil society and politics in Vienna told TRT World, explaining further that the party was taking incremental steps in its behaviour to test the waters.

An Austrian study analysing the party’s history says: “The social profile of its voters has hardly changed over the years: The FPO’s voting base is predominantly above average among men, younger people, workers, and persons with a lower level of education.”

Muslims have become the targets of increasing Islamophobia in Austria, with 540 anti-Muslim incidents in 2018 compared to 309 in 2017, according to the Anti-Muslim Racism Report.

“Anti-Muslim racism is a daily problem in Austria and there is a risk that this behaviour i is becoming increasingly normalised in the country’s political and social climate”, said writer Elias Feroz.

Mustafa Isık called on Austrian Chancellor Sebastian Kurz to take effective measures against the FPO.

“Such incidents should be sufficient to dissolve the coalition. Otherwise we will hear many more of these kinds of events for the next three and a half years. years.”

Source: TRT World
US Senators Urge Biden To Lift Sanctions Against Venezuela

They pointed out that the harsh policies against Venezuela has only served to deepen this Latin American country's economic crisis and undermine U.S. credibility.

Citizens walk down a street, Caracas, Venezuela.
Photo: Twitter/ @SamadhiMD1

Published 13 May 2022

On Wednesday, 18 Democratic Party (DP) senators urged President Joe Biden to continue pursuing dialogue with the Venezuelan government and, in support of that process, to consider lifting the economic sanctions against it.

RELATED:
Venezuela and OPEC Agree to Strengthen Cooperation

“We commend Biden for his recent efforts toward constructive engagement with President Nicolas Maduro’s administration, actions thank to which U.S. citizens condemned in Venezuela for corruption, Gustavo Cardenas and Jorge Fernandez, could be brought back home,” the senators stated.

They stressed that the harsh policies prompted by former President Donald Trump against Venezuela has only served to deepen this Latin American country's economic crisis and undermine U.S. credibility.

The U.S. attempts to foment a military uprising, threats of armed intervention, the ending of diplomatic relations, and the imposition of the economic blockade has prompted that Venezuelan living standards fell by 71.8 percent between 2012 and 2020.

The U.S. foreign policy has also harmed Venezuela's international economic activities, causing its national gross domestic product (GDP) to contract by 74.3 percent in the last eight years.


Broad sanctions are widely known to disproportionately harm vulnerable populations, including people with disabilities or chronic diseases, Indigenous communities, and women, the senators remarked, stressing that the easing of sanctions will mark a step forward in the process of engagement and diplomacy.

Among the senators who made the petition are Raul Grijalva, Jesus Garcia, Jan Schakowsky, and Juan Vargas, to whom Republican Party (RP) senator for the Florida state Marco Rubio forcibly opposed.

“The U.S. government has already lifted many sanctions against the Maduro regime. This request only seeks to cover what Biden proposes to announce very soon," alleged Rubio, who is widely known for its aggressive policy against Cuba and Venezuela.



Shipwreck off Puerto Rico Coast Leaves at Least 11 Dead



The U.S. Coast Guard said Thursday, that at least 31 people were rescued. May. 13, 2022. |
 Photo: Twitter/@24Happenings

Published 13 May 2022

According to the U.S. Coast Guard's report on Thursday, 31 survivors had been rescued so far.

At least 11 people died off the west coast of Puerto Rico on Thursday after a boat with dozens of migrants on board capsized, the U.S. Coast Guard reported. Local sources, the vessel suspected of transporting migrants from the Dominican Republic overturned about 19 kilometers north of Puerto Rico's Desecheo Islet.

The U.S. coastal force detailed that 31 survivors had been rescued and that, in conjunction with Puerto Rican forces, a large rescue operation was being carried out in the area. Troops are also supporting this massive operation from the Maritime Units of the United Rapid Action Forces (FURA) of the municipalities of Aguadilla and Añasco.

The Puerto Rican Coast Guard received a report from a Customs and Border Protection plane that said it had seen a boat and people around it who did not appear to be wearing life jackets.

The region known as the Mona Channel, located between Puerto Rico and the Dominican Republic, is a busy route for human smugglers and migrants, and almost weekly arrests of vessels occur, including Thursday; authorities had announced the deportation of 44 Dominicans intercepted in this area.



The few security measures and the disrespect of the navigation rules regarding the weight established for each vessel cause the numerous coastal incidents that also occur in this region.

Just three days ago, the Coast Guard reported the rescue of 68 people during a shipwreck and the recovery of the body of a deceased woman.

 

Puerto Rico boat wreck victims mostly Haitian


Customs and Border Protection and Puerto Rico Police respond to a capsized boat north of Desecheo Island, Puerto Rico on May 12, 2022 AFP

Fri, May 13, 2022

The majority of migrants traveling in a boat that capsized off the coast of Puerto Rico were Haitians, authorities said Friday, adding that of the 11 dead, all were women.

A total of 38 survivors have been found and rescuers continue to search where the accident occurred, about 10 nautical miles (19 kilometers) north of Desecheo Island, an uninhabited US territory between Puerto Rico and the Dominican Republic.

The survivors were "36 Haitian and 2 Dominican Republic nationals, of which eight remain hospitalized," the US Coast Guard said on Twitter Friday.

Haitian Prime Minister Ariel Henry tweeted his condolences to the families of the dead, who he said were Haitians.

"The news of the sinking of a boat off the coast of Puerto Rico which caused the death of 11 of our compatriots deeply upsets me," he said.

Of the dead were all were women, and autopsies will be performed on them, according to the Puerto Rico Forensic Science Institute.

A Customs and Border Patrol helicopter first spotted the boat and people in the water who appeared not to be wearing life jackets around midday on Thursday.

Several days prior, a Haitian woman died in the area after her boat carrying 69 migrants capsized. The other passengers were rescued by the US Coast Guard and the Dominican Navy.

In March, hundreds of Haitian arrived by boat in Florida. And more than 100 were intercepted by the coast guard near the Bahamas.

Haiti, the poorest country in the Americas, is facing an acute political, economic and security crisis.

gma/bfm/bgs
Peru: Earthquake Higher Than 8.5 Degrees Possible


Peru's Geophysical Institute forecasts earthquake of more than 8.5 in the country's capital Lima. May. 13, 2022. 
| Photo: Twitter/@GlendimarDPrevious

Published 13 May 2022 

According to experts, anearthquake with a magnitude greater than 8.5 is likely to hit Peru's capital city.

According to the Geophysical Institute of Peru (IGP), there is a high possibility of an earthquake higher than 8.5 degrees occurring in the capital of Lima.

"We are talking about an earthquake that probably has not been repeated since 1746 and that will probably exceed magnitude 8.5; that is why Indeci (National Institute of Civil Defense) is doing the drills right now for earthquakes of 8.5 and 8.8, which is what could happen in Lima," IGP chief Hernando Tavera told local television America.

The head of the IGP said that Lima is the area of the country where the greatest energy had built up due to the seismic silence that had existed in the capital since the 18th century when the last great movement occurred.

Furthermore, Tavera said that the Seismic Alert System, developed by Indeci, will be operational in early 2023 via mobile telephony to warn the population if a movement occurs.



On May 12, the National Seismological Center of Peru registered an earthquake of magnitude 5.5 with epicenter 30 kilometers from the district of Chilca, located in the department of Lima. The seismic event left one dead and eight injured.
Europe’s new liquified gas infrastructure puts climate targets in question

In a race to stop buying Russian natural gas, European countries are building new infrastructure that many fear could lead to a fossil-fuel “lock-in.” Germany houses six of the nearly dozen liquified natural gas import facilities across Europe.

Port cranes load a climate friendly LNG, liquefied natural gas, powered container ship at the import and export harbor in Hamburg, Germany, March 19, 2022.
Martin Meissner/AP/File photo

May 12, 2022 · 
By Carolyn Beeler

In a quest to wean off of Russian natural gas, European countries are racing to build new infrastructure to be able to accept liquified gas from producers further afield.

Analysts are tracking nearly a dozen liquified natural gas (LNG) import facilities across Europe that have been proposed since the beginning of the war in Ukraine — with Germany alone housing six of them.

“This is the scenario that will make us independent,” German Economy and Climate Minister Robert Habeck said, while in the North Sea port town of Wilhelmshaven last week, where he went to sign lease agreements for four new floating natural gas storage facilities.

Gas produced in places like Qatar and the US can be cooled and shipped to these floating facilities, then regassified and distributed into Germany’s network.

Related: As Germany reckons with Russian energy, this village is caught in the crossroads

Before the war in Ukraine started, Germany got more than half of its gas from Russia. It’s knocked that down to about a third in the past few months, but says the new liquefied natural gas infrastructure is necessary to meet its energy needs in the medium-term.

During his visit to Wilhelmshaven, Habeck said the first two floating facilities will start operating up by the beginning of next year, providing about a quarter of the gas that Germany got from Russia before the war, with the rest coming online by May 2023. The government is also planning two permanent facilities to import LNG.

But the plans are not without controversy.

Germany aims to become carbon neutral in 2045, a goal that was enshrined into law last summer. And many environmentalists fear that this new infrastructure will lock-in use of fossil fuels longer than necessary.


“We need to get rid of fossil fuels and we should not build new fossil infrastructure. We see it as moral and economic and ecological madness.”Reinhard Knof, operates statewide environmental group in Schleswig-Holstein

“We need to get rid of fossil fuels and we should not build new fossil infrastructure,” said Reinhard Knof, who runs a statewide environmental group in Schleswig-Holstein, where one of the floating terminals and a permanent LNG facility. More than half-funded by the federal government is planned in the town of Brunsbüttel.

“We see it as moral and economic and ecological madness,” Knof said, while standing on a tall earthen dike near the mouth of the Elbe River, at an industrial port where the terminal will be built.


Reinhard Knof near the site of the planned natural gas terminal in Brunsbüttel, Germany.
Credit: Carolyn Beeler/The World

Knof was quoting UN Secretary General Antoinio Guterres, who said last month that “investing in new fossil fuel infrastructure is moral and economic madness.”

The move came after the latest UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report found that using only existing and previously planned fossil fuel infrastructure for the rest of its lifespan would put the most ambitious Paris climate agreement target of limiting warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius out of reach.

New investments, Guterres said, “will soon be stranded assets, a blot on the landscape and a blight on investment portfolios.”

The German government says natural gas will be phased out in the medium-term, and new gas infrastructure will be built to eventually switch over to handle hydrogen fuel.

Related: Germans turn down the heat, drive less and take cold showers to use less Russian energy

Hydrogen produced by renewable energy is considered a small but important, low-emissions energy source for hard-to-decarbonize industries and transport sectors.

It’s not yet clear how much this kind of retrofit would cost, or how quickly it could happen.

Already, Reuters has reported that Qatar is balking at Germany’s desire to sign shorter-term contracts for LNG.

“For us,this seems to be kind of a fossil trap,” said Constantin Zerger, head of energy and climate protection at Environmental Action Germany.

“We are building a new fossil infrastructure in Germany, which is connected to fossil infrastructure overseas, which is connected to new extraction projects. And this will all add up to additional greenhouse gas emissions all around the world.”Constantin Zerger, head of energy and climate protection at Environmental Action Germany

“We are building a new fossil infrastructure in Germany, which is connected to fossil infrastructure overseas, which is connected to new extraction projects,” Zerger said. “And this will all add up to additional greenhouse gas emissions all around the world.”

The White House has pledged to more than double LNG exports from the US to Europe by 2030.

And planned gas liquefaction projects have been moving forward faster than they were before the Russian invasion of Ukraine, said S&P Global Commodity Insights natural gas analyst Jack Winters.

“There has been a lot of activity that has picked up,” he said.

Related: A massive security flaw exposed in Germany — then a criminal investigation

Winters said that in the next five years, capacity for liquifying natural gas in the US will jump 60%.

“You would need a production increase from the US producers to be able to feed this … LNG export capacity expected to come online,” he said.

This all brings Constantin Zerger to say something surprising for an environmental activist — that it might be better for Germany to keep burning coal a bit longer than planned, than to spur this kind of natural gas development.


“We will have coal, which is from an environmental point of view, of course, terrible. But it might buy us some time to get the renewables in place."Constantin Zerger, head of energy and climate protection at Environmental Action Germany

“We will have coal, which is from an environmental point of view, of course, terrible. But it might buy us some time to get the renewables in place. And this might be a better option than building new LNG terminals,” he said, citing a concern over a fossil-fuel “lock-in” with expensive and long-lived infrastructure.

Germany already missed its greenhouse gas reduction targets last year, and the economy and climate minister Robert Habeck has said that it’s likely to also miss them this year and next. But, he insists, the new gas infrastructure doesn’t put the country’s longer-term targets at risk.

The mayor of Brunsbüttel, the North Sea town where both a floating and permanent facility are planned, supports the new infrastructure and the jobs and revenue it will bring to his town.

But he acknowledges that Germany is in a tough spot with conflicting goals, as it tries to transition away from Russian energy.

Related: 'We are not alone': Volunteers provide critical support for Germans struggling in the aftermath of deadly flood

“It’s indescribably difficult,” Martin Schmedtje said. But he also believes the new natural gas terminal is necessary to keep the German economy growing, and give nearby chemical companies time to transition to renewable energy.

“We need this terminal,” he said, voicing an opinion that’s grown widely across Europe since the Russian invasion of Ukraine began.

Afghan women say Taliban's new rules aim to make them 'disappear from public life'

The Taliban in Afghanistan have announced new rules requiring women to cover their faces when in public. The decree also says that women should only leave home when necessary. This is the latest in a series of restrictions imposed on women since the group came to power last summer.



An Afghan woman waits to receive a food ration distributed by a South Korea humanitarian aid group, in Kabul, Afghanistan, May 10, 2022.

Ebrahim Noroozi/AP

May 13, 2022 · 
By Shirin Jaafari

A few days after the fall of Kabul, in Afghanistan, 18-year-old Aghela Amiri was randomly stopped by a Taliban fighter.

He complained that her sleeves were too short and that her hair was showing —he told her it was unacceptable for a Muslim woman. Before she could say anything, the man whipped her arms.

She took pictures of the bruises when she got home. She said that she felt humiliated, scared and angry.


“This type of fanatical thinking is the root cause of all our misery in this country.” Aghela Amiri, Kabul resident

“This type of fanatical thinking is the root cause of all our misery in this country,” she said.

Related: Amid chaos, young Afghan refugees find something familiar in St. Louis — soccer

Since that incident last August, Amiri has stopped wearing colorful outfits in public. These days, she wears a long, black, loose cloak. She makes sure that her hair is not showing.


Last August, when Kabul, Afghanistan, fell, Aghela Amiri, 18, was whipped by a Taliban fighter who criticized the length of her sleeves and the fact that her hair was showing. She took photos of the bruises when she got home.
Credit:Courtesy of Aghela Amiri

But now, the Taliban are imposing even stricter rules. Over the weekend, Taliban officials issued a decree listing several new restrictions. Among them, women must wear a burqa, the head-to-toe covering that has mesh across the eyes.

The decree also requires that women only leave home when absolutely necessary. If they don’t follow these rules, their male relatives will be punished.

“I was shocked. They’ve imposed so [many] restrictions on women I don’t know what else is left,” Amiri said.

In response to the Taliban's decree, small groups of women in Kabul and other cities are going out to protest.

Julia Parsi, a women’s rights advocate, was an organizer of one of the protests this past week.


“We marched in the streets, but the Taliban stopped us and told us to go home,” she said from Kabul.

Parsi said that she and others tried to reason with the men. They told them they are upset about the new restrictions, and that women in Afghanistan are observant Muslims and they already dress modestly in public.

“I will never agree to cover my face,” Parsi said. “I won’t be able to breathe.”


Julia Parsi, a women’s rights advocate, organized a protest in response to the Taliban’s new rules requiring women to wear a burqa, and to stay home.
Credit: Courtesy of Julia Parsi

Women protesters in Afghanistan have paid a heavy price since the Taliban took control of the country nine months ago. One woman with whom The World spoke said that she was arrested and detained for several weeks for protesting, and that her family was threatened as well. So, she has paused her activism for now.

The dress code is just one of many restrictions the Taliban have imposed on women. They have also limited access to education and employment.

Parsi, who has two daughters, said that her heart breaks when she sees them at home instead of school.

“They have no future in this country,” she said. “That’s why I risk my life to protest. I’m scared, but what other choice do I have?”

For Zahra Rahimi, watching all this from outside of Afghanistan is painful.


She was a reporter for a TV program in Afghanistan. She said that when the Taliban came to power, she and her family were threatened, leaving her with no choice but to flee. She is now living in Canada.

Small groups of women in Afghanistan have taken to the streets to protest the Taliban’s latest restrictions on women. 
Credit: Courtesy of Julia Parsi

Rahimi said that sometimes Taliban leaders claim that women’s rights is a Western concept and that only the elite in Kabul care about issues like women’s education and employment.

“My own father comes from a remote area in Afghanistan. He used to take me and my sister to school every day on a motorcycle. The trip was two hours long but he wanted us — his daughters — to be educated.” 
Zahra Rahimi, Afghan in Canada

“My own father comes from a remote area in Afghanistan,” she said. “He used to take me and my sister to school every day on a motorcycle. The trip was two hours long but he wanted us — his daughters — to be educated.”

Rahimi’s family is still in Afghanistan, and she is most worried about her 15-year-old sister.

“Every night, when I talk to her, I tell her to be careful,” Rahimi said. “I tell her to wear whatever the Taliban have ordered. Don’t risk your life.”

“My sister is very upset but there is nothing I can do,” Rahimi added.


Rahimi and other critics of the Taliban restrictions on women say the group has one goal — to make women disappear from public life.

The Taliban might have weapons and political power, but many Afghan women still say that they won’t stop fighting for their basic rights.
ABOLISH ICE
Immigrant students settle with govt over fake university


Six years after ICE revealed a university was a sting operation, the students caught in the middle say they still haven’t fully recovered.



A US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officer watches during an operation in Escondido, California, July 8, 2019.
Gregory Bull/AP

On Course
The World
May 12, 2022 
By Max Rivlin-Nadler


When Monica Zheng came to the US from China in 2011 to study journalism, she had high hopes for a new life in the country.

Instead, for years now, she’s been mired in legal proceedings. She’s one of hundreds of foreign students who banded together in a lawsuit after they learned that the New Jersey university that they attended was fake — set up by Immigration and Customs Enforcement as part of a sting operation.

Related: Colorado law students gain ‘powerful’ lessons providing free legal services to immigrants

Last week, Zheng and hundreds of former students reached a settlement agreement in their class-action lawsuit against the government in a federal court in New Jersey.

Zheng, who eventually obtained a green card and is now working in the tech industry in Texas, said that the settlement isn’t enough to make up for the disruption to her life and career that resulted from the ICE sting operation.

“I literally did everything by the book, but it ended up, they used this sting operation on poor students. I pay taxes, I do everything by the book. It feels pretty crappy for a couple of years.”Monica Zheng, former student of the sham ICE university who is part of the class-action lawsuit against the US government

“I literally did everything by the book, but it ended up, they used this sting operation on poor students,” she said. “I pay taxes, I do everything by the book. It feels pretty crappy for a couple of years.”

Under the settlement’s terms, the government will pay over $450,000 in legal fees but isn’t admitting to any wrongdoing.

There isn’t any financial compensation for the former students, but they will be able to receive expedited processing of new visa applications, have their immigration records wiped clean of fraud accusations, and be able to reenter the United States if they leave the country.
Zheng’s story

After two years at college, Zheng graduated, but she was still on a student visa, which only allowed her to stay in the United States for one more year.

She found a job in information technology in Texas, and her employer wanted her to keep working for them.

Related: Despite flurry of efforts to recruit immigrants with medical experience, many remain sidelined

Zheng had plans to go back to school to get a PhD, but wanted to make some more money before then.

So, Zheng did what many students do — she enrolled in a master’s program that allowed her to get credit for working, also known as curriculum practical training.

That way, Zheng would be able to get another student visa, and earn money.

To get that visa, Zheng used a visa broker, who are often called on to help foreign students navigate these types of visas that are enmeshed in bureaucracy. It was through that broker that Zheng found out about the University of Northern New Jersey.

Zheng checked out the university and did her usual due diligence: “I called the person and then I checked multiple times because I’m a very cautious person,” Zheng said. “So, I check everywhere. I double-check on the DHS website, I check everywhere, and everything seemed legit. Even my employer checked and saw it was authorized.”

Related: 'Hidden discrimination': California university joins national trend to protect against caste bias on campus

Zheng attended the school for a few months and then switched to a different graduate program at another university, one that she attended in person, where she could study information technology.

At the University of Northern New Jersey, she was only doing curricular practical training, which gave her school credit for working. After leaving UNNJ, she thought nothing was suspicious about her experience — thousands of other students use similar arrangements each year.

Then, one day in April 2016, two years after she had left UNNJ, Zheng received a letter from the US Citizenship and Immigration Services informing her that her visa had been canceled. It said that she had committed fraud, but gave her no further information.


“It [felt] horrible. I am pretty sure I had a panic attack when I opened the letter.”Monica Zheng, former student of the sham ICE university who is part of the class-action lawsuit against the US government

“It [felt] horrible,” she said. “I am pretty sure I had a panic attack when I opened the letter.”

Zheng was bewildered. She sought help from the international office at her then-school in Texas, where she was getting a doctorate. The office pulled up an article from The New York Times, with the headline: “New Jersey University Was Fake, but Visa Fraud Arrests Are Real.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement had been running UNNJ for three years, as a front for a sting operation against visa brokers. Zheng and over a thousand other students, had “attended” the fake university, almost all of them doing curricular practical training without having any idea that the school wasn’t real.

Related: Echoing WWII rescue efforts, ethnic Russian researchers in the US support Ukrainian scholars

Seeing the article, Zheng realized that there were other people in the same position that she was, many of them Chinese nationals, and she began reaching out to them. Soon, they came together on the lawsuit in the hopes that they get their visas restored. That was in 2016.

Elizabeth Montano, an attorney for the students from the Miami-based firm Kurzban Kurzban Tetzeli & Pratt, said in the New Jersey Monitor that the government did not provide any information about how many foreign nationals are still in the country and how many went back to their home countries.

The 100 people whom she’s been in touch with about the settlement live near New Jersey, according to Montana.
 
A case of ‘gross overreach’

The US Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency set up the fake university in New Jersey as a part of a sting operation to crack down on brokers who were taking kickbacks from schools. In total, 22 visa brokers were arrested.




A screenshot from the fake school, University of Northern New Jersey, or UNNJ, set up by Immigration and Customs Enforcement as part of a sting operation. The school has been shut down and the website is archived.

Credit: Screenshot from the archived site for UNNJ

ICE also ran a similar operation in Michigan, which led to the arrests of 161 students and the deportation of 600 people.

ICE shut down UNNJ in 2016 after the academic brokers were arrested for fraud, and immediately terminated all related student F-1 visas based on “fraudulent enrollment,” the suit states.

Many of the students had paid thousands of dollars to brokers and thousands more to the school in tuition. Some of the students were threatened with deportation, and many left the country as a result.

The civil lawsuit bounced around the federal courts system for years as the students argued they had been unfairly targeted by the government.

At one point, an appeals court castigated the government, saying it went to great lengths to create this fake university — with a campus, logo and ICE agents posing as school officials.

“In a case of gross overreach, [the federal government] said, ‘Well, let’s just assume all the students committed fraud,” attorney Ira Kurzban said.

He represents a group of these foreign students, including Zheng, who sued the government.

“[The government] had no basis to do that. They hadn’t interviewed or even spoken to any of those students.”Ira Kurzban , attorney for the students

“[The government] had no basis to do that. They hadn’t interviewed or even spoken to any of those students.”

On top of that, ICE’s fake university seemed so real, that even a judge noted “that the only thing left out was their rankings in the NCAA [National Collegiate Athletic Association],” Kurzban recalled.

Today, the website for UNNJ is still archived on the internet, showing smiling faces of students and proclaiming that the university offered “the highest quality of undergraduate and graduate education for students throughout New Jersey, the United States, and the world.”

The World asked ICE for a response but the agency said it doesn’t comment on litigation proceedings or outcomes. An ICE spokesperson said it was tasked with enforcing all immigration laws, including those impacting student visas.
 
The hoops that many students and former students have to jump through to stay in the United States has made situations like the UNNJ sting possible, explained Jill Welch, with the Presidents’ Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, an advocacy group of university leaders.

“International students are very closely monitored and regulated and they’re very limited in what they can do workwise while in the United States,” Welch said.

She said that she believes that the fact that students educated in the United States can’t then easily get work permits doesn’t make much sense as a policy goal.

“You think when someone gets a full degree here, they can stay and contribute their skills and talents in the US economy, but there’s no direct path to do that,” Welch said.

Other countries, like Canada, have a clear path for foreign students to then join its workforce, she said.
Alito Calls Landmark Supreme Court Decision Expanding LGBTQ Worker Rights ‘Indefensible’
 Associate Justice Samuel Alito 
(Photo by Erin Schaff-Pool/Getty Images)

By Kate Riga
TPM
May 13, 2022 

Justice Samuel Alito is evidentially toting around an old grudge.

At a Thursday night event at the Antonin Scalia Law School at George Mason University, he had harsh words for the two conservative justices who joined the majority in Bostock v. Clayton County.

The 2020 opinion said that the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits sex-based discrimination, extends to gay and transgender workers. Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote the majority opinion, in which he was joined by the liberals and Chief Justice John Roberts.

Speaking via a video feed Thursday, Alito called Gorsuch a “colleague and friend,” but said that grounding the decision in the text of the 1964 law was “in my view indefensible,” according to the Washington Post.

“It is inconceivable that either Congress or voters in 1964 understood discrimination because of sex to mean discrimination because of sexual orientation, much less gender identity,” Alito said. “If Title VII had been understood at that time to mean what Bostock held it to mean, the prohibition on discrimination because of sex would never have been enacted. In fact, it might not have gotten a single vote in Congress.”

His disdain for the opinion has long simmered.

“The Court’s opinion is like a pirate ship,” he wrote in his dissent. “It sails under a textualist flag, but what it actually represents is a theory of statutory interpretation that Jus­tice Scalia excoriated — the theory that courts should ‘update’ old statutes so that they better reflect the current val­ues of society.”

Alito wasn’t the only conservative enraged by the decision, and by Gorsuch and Roberts’ defections.

“All those evangelicals who sided with Trump in 2016 to protect them from the cultural currents, just found their excuse to stay home in 2020 thank to Trump’s Supreme Court picks,” seethed conservative radio host Erick Erickson on Twitter.

“Justice Scalia would be disappointed that his successor has bungled textualism so badly today, for the sake of appealing to college campuses and editorial boards. This was not judging, this was legislating — a brute force attack on our constitutional system,” bemoaned Carrie Severino, president of the right-wing Judicial Crisis Network.

While Alito was relitigating the old disagreement, protesters were posted up outside of the event to either celebrate or condemn a much fresher battleground: the justice’s leaked draft majority opinion overturning Roe v. Wade.


Kate Riga (@Kate_Riga24) is a D.C. reporter for TPM and a contributor to the Josh Marshall Podcast.