Wednesday, May 25, 2022

FEMINIST FILIPINA ROCK N ROLL
The All-Female Band Fanny Made History. A New Doc Illuminates It.

The group put out five albums in the ’70s and counted David Bowie and Bonnie Raitt as fans. The filmmaker Bobbi Jo Hart, dismayed its story hadn’t been told, took action.

Before Fanny, Jean Millington, Brie Darling, Wendy Haas Mull and June Millington performed as the Svelts.
Credit...Steve Griffith

By Mark Yarm
May 25, 2022

In spring 2015, the documentary filmmaker Bobbi Jo Hart was clicking around the Taylor Guitars website, looking for a new instrument for her 10-year-old daughter, when she came across a short profile of June Millington, the singer and lead guitarist for the pioneering 1970s all-female rock group Fanny.

Hart, now 56 and living in Montreal, grew up in a hippie household in California “with piles of LPs all over the place”: David Bowie, the Rolling Stones, Fleetwood Mac, and on and on. But she had never even heard of Fanny, despite the fact that it was the first all-female rock band to release an album on a major label.

Fanny put out a total of five albums between 1970 and 1974, one of which was produced by Todd Rundgren. The band scored two Top 40 hits — the swinging, soulful “Charity Ball” and the doo-wop-flavored “Butter Boy” — and played in the United States and abroad with Slade, Jethro Tull, Humble Pie, the Kinks and Chicago. The group backed Barbra Streisand in the studio and performed on “The Sonny & Cher Comedy Hour” and “American Bandstand.”

In 1999, Bowie hailed Fanny as one of the finest rock bands of its time in Rolling Stone. He also lamented that “nobody’s ever mentioned them.”

Kathy Valentine, the bassist of the Go-Go’s, a later all-female band, wished more people had spread the word about Fanny. “If their visibility had been higher,” she said in an interview, “we would have seen a lot more women in the rock landscape.” Valentine didn’t hear about Fanny until 1982, she said, by which time the Go-Go’s were making their second album.



When Hart, the filmmaker, first learned about Fanny online, she had a visceral reaction. “It really pissed me off,” she said. “It was just another example of amazing women that we don’t know about.” Hart reached out to former band members about the possibility of a documentary, but determined that at the time, the Fanny story didn’t have the “forward-momentum narrative” she was looking for.

Then, in January 2017, Hart attended the Women’s March in Washington. She was watching Madonna speak on the Jumbotron when she spotted a woman with “flaming gray hair” onstage, filming the proceedings on her iPhone. It was June Millington. The sighting spurred Hart to call Millington, who had some news: Three members of Fanny — Millington, her younger sister, the bassist and singer Jean (Millington) Adamian, and the drummer and singer Brie Darling, a fellow Filipina-American — were about to make a new album on an indie label. The moment for a film had arrived.

The resulting documentary, “Fanny: The Right to Rock,” opens in New York on Friday before hitting other major markets and, on Aug. 2, video on demand. (It will come to PBS in 2023.) The movie documents the making of that album, recorded under the name Fanny Walked the Earth and released in 2018, and features interviews with five members from the original group’s frequently shifting lineup. (The reclusive keyboardist Nickey Barclay, who has said she hated her time in the band, notably did not participate. She also declined to speak for this article.) Valentine, Bonnie Raitt and the Def Leppard frontman Joe Elliott are among the talking heads.
From left: Jean Millington, Nickey Barclay, Brie Darling, Alice de Buhr
 and June Millington practice in the basement of their band’s famed home, Fanny Hill.
Credit...Linda Wolf

The documentary lovingly recounts the history of Fanny, beginning with the sisters June and Jean Millington, who were born in the Philippines to a white American naval officer father and a Filipina socialite mother. In 1961, the Millington family moved overseas to Sacramento, Calif., where the sisters, as early adolescents, had a difficult time fitting in. Racism was a constant part of life. (In the film, Jean recalls the father of a boyfriend of hers telling his son, “I’ll buy you a Mustang if you stop seeing that half-breed girl.” The boyfriend opted for the car.)

The sisters found solace in music, forming an all-girl band in high school called the Svelts, which played the radio hits of the day. The Svelts morphed into Wild Honey, a Motown cover group that decamped to Los Angeles in 1969 to make it big. Wild Honey signed with Warner Bros. Records’s Reprise label later that year. Not long after, the band, looking for a new name with a female identity, chose Fanny, which in the United States is slang for bottom.

“We thought it was a double entendre that would work,” said June Millington, 74. It wasn’t until the band members toured overseas that they discovered that in Britain, fanny is slang for female genitals.

Early on, the band lived in Fanny Hill, a house in West Hollywood that Millington, in the film, calls “a sorority with electrical guitars.” Joe Cocker and the lead singer of the Band, Rick Danko, hung out there, and the group Little Feat would come over and jam; Raitt was a houseguest for a time. A libertine, clothing-optional spirit prevailed. “It was a wonderful, creative environment,” said Darling, who is 72 and lives in Los Angeles. “It wasn’t people just getting high” and having sex.

The film highlights the fact that two of Fanny’s members — June Millington and the drummer Alice de Buhr — are lesbians, something that the band never dared speak about publicly in those days. “People would ask us, ‘Do you have a boyfriend?’” recalled de Buhr, now 72 and residing in Tucson, Ariz. “And I’d say, ‘I’m taken.’ I hated not being able to say, ‘Well, I’m in love with a woman.’”

Predictably, Fanny was subjected to a great deal of sexism, often being treated as a novelty act. “Most of society didn’t see girls with a guitar between their legs,” said Patti Quatro, 74, who replaced Millington as lead guitarist in 1974. (Quatro, of Austin, Texas, is an older sister of Suzi Quatro.)

Millington said that the “condescension and sneering” that would greet Fanny at concert appearances was “so palpable it was almost physical.”

Both Millington and her sister recalled, however, that Fanny would ultimately win over the crowd. “I felt like it took at least 10 minutes for everyone to realize there was not a boy band playing behind us,” said Jean (Millington) Adamian, 73, who lives in Davis, Calif. “They were waiting for us to fall down. And once we proved it was really us playing and singing, it was generally a big, uplifting experience.”

Rock critics weren’t always swayed though. “We were battered by the reviews,” Millington said. “Every once in a while, they’d say, ‘Oh, they’re good.’” She cited a generally positive 1971 concert review in this newspaper headlined “Fanny, a Four-Girl Rock Group, Poses a Challenge to Male Ego.” “‘What will it do to the male ego?’ Well, who cares?” she said. “Why don’t you guys just deal with it and dig us?”


 
“The fact is that Fanny is a flame that ignites people,” June Millington said.
Credit...Linda Wolf


JUNE MILLINGTON EXITED Fanny in late 1973 in part because of a near “nervous breakdown,” she said in a video interview. “I’m glad I left, because I knew that my life was on the line on some major level.” She was sitting in front of a crackling fire at her home on the campus of the Institute for the Musical Arts, a nonprofit recording and retreat facility she co-founded with her longtime partner, Ann Hackler, in Goshen, Mass. On the mantel were various Buddhist objects — Millington is a practitioner of Tibetan Buddhism — and a framed photo of Jimi Hendrix.

“The straw that broke the camel’s back,” Millington said, was the record company’s insistence that Fanny, whose members favored ’70s California chic, dress up in glammy, more revealing outfits onstage. (“My top was $45 worth of American coins, looped together, that just pinched my nipples,” de Buhr said.) Millington saw it as a sign that Reprise had lost faith in the band. “I took it as an insult,” she said.

A new version of Fanny — featuring Adamian, Barclay, Darling and Quatro — signed with Casablanca Records and released a final album, “Rock and Roll Survivors,” in 1974. That record featured the single “Butter Boy,” which Adamian said was inspired by — but not about, as has been widely reported — her then-boyfriend, Bowie, and his gender-bending ways.




“‘He was hard as a rock, but I was ready to roll, what a shock to find out I was in control of the situation,’” Adamian said, reciting the song’s opening lines. “I mean, those kinds of lyrics were very tongue-in-cheek and intended to be provocative.” “Butter Boy” became Fanny’s biggest hit, reaching No. 29 on the Billboard Hot 100 in April 1975. But by that time, the band had split up for reasons both artistic and personal.

Fanny has technically never reunited. But in 2016, Millington, Adamian and Darling played together at a concert in Northampton, Mass., a collaboration that led to the self-titled album “Fanny Walked the Earth.” That LP includes appearances by de Buhr and Quatro, plus Valentine of the Go-Go’s and members of fellow all-female groups the Runaways and the Bangles.

A tentative plan to tour behind the Fanny Walked the Earth album was scuttled when, two months before the record’s March 2018 release, Adamian suffered a stroke that affected the right side of her body. Today, she uses a wheelchair to get around. “I cannot play bass,” she said. “I keep looking at my two fingers, going, ‘If just one of you would move, that would be good.’ It’s absolutely frustrating.”

Fanny Walked the Earth’s Jean Adamian, Darling and June Millington.
Credit...Marita Madeloni

Millington has experienced health issues of her own. Her snow-white hair was noticeably shorter than it had been during the Fanny Walked the Earth era, the result of chemotherapy she received last year to treat breast cancer that is now in remission.

“I knew I was going to live because my work is not done,” she said. “So anything can happen.” She didn’t discount the idea of some version of Fanny recording or touring again. As for the latter scenario, she said it would take a lot of money to do so properly, given the medical situations she and her sister faced. (Adamian has sung live with Fanny Walked the Earth since her stroke; her son, Lee Madeloni, filled in on bass.)

In the meantime, Millington said, she was looking forward to the release of “Fanny: The Right to Rock.” Hart, the director, expressed the wish that the documentary would lead to far wider appreciation for the band. “A not-so-secret dream that I have is if they would get that recognition to be in the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame,” Hart said.

Millington isn’t waiting for a call from the Rock Hall. “Is it ever going to happen? I don’t know,” she said. “And at this point, I don’t care.” She said she was comfortable resting on her laurels. “I’m fine with it, because I never imagined anyone would mention Fanny ever again,” she said. “For 30, 40 years, we couldn’t get arrested.”

The internet, she said, is exposing new audiences to the band. “Fanny is a flame that ignites people,” Millington continued. “It is igniting people all over the world of different ages and different sexes. It’s like the Olympic torch, and that is really something to be proud of.”

A version of this article appears in print on May 29, 2022, Section AR, Page 16 of the New York edition with the headline: A Reminder That They Rocked. 

OF COURSE I COLLECTED THEIR ALBUMS WHICH ARE AN EARLY FORM OF GRUNGE

 Rishi Sunak Hits The Rich List While Holding Out On Help For The Poorest


People are pointing out the inconvenient timing as the chancellor and his wife enter the Sunday Times rankings for the first time.


By Graeme Demianyk
HUFFPOST
20/05/2022 

Chancellor of the exchequer Rishi Sunak alongside his wife Akshata Murthy.

IAN WEST VIA PA WIRE/PA IMAGES

Rishi Sunak has become the first frontline politician to be named in The Sunday Times Rich List since its inception in 1989 – just as the chancellor faces pressure to help ease the cost-of-living crisis facing households.

On the week inflation hit a 40-year high, prompting further fears about the UK tipping into a recession, Sunak and wife Akshata Murty entered The Sunday Times Rich List for the first time with their joint £730 million fortune.

Their listing among the nation’s 250 wealthiest people also comes after their finances came under intense scrutiny when it emerged Murty holds non-domiciled status allowing her to reduce her UK tax bill.

The timing could not have been worse for the ambitious politician, who earlier this week promised a tax cut for big business but conspicuously only said he was “standing ready” to help families.

Sunak had been seen as a frontrunner in any leadership contest to replace Boris Johnson but his standing was severely dented by the scrutiny of his family’s exorbitant wealth.

The chancellor has been resisting calls to impose a windfall tax on the high profits of oil and gas giants to help fund measures to ease the crisis, as well as facing demands to cut taxes as part of a new support package.

On Friday morning, the Sunday Times Rich List revealed the couple featured at 222 in the list with the joint forecast of £730 million, driven by Murty’s £690 million stake in Infosys.

It was estimated Murty’s non-dom status could have saved her £20 million in taxes on dividends from her shares in Infosys, an Indian IT company founded by her father.

She later agreed to pay UK taxes on her worldwide income.

Sunak was cleared of breaching the ministerial code by the prime minister’s standards adviser after considering the tax affairs.

Many on social media were quick to point out how further publicity of his wealth puts Sunak in a tricky spot.

But deputy prime minister Dominic Raab praised Sunak on Times Radio.

He said: “Rishi Sunak is a fantastic example of someone who’s been successful in business who’s come in to make a big impact in public service.

“I think we want more of those people.

“I think it’s fantastic that you’ve got someone of British Indian origin, showing all people in our country that you can get to the top of politics.

“And frankly, I think if I understood correctly, The Sunday Times Rich List was a reflection of not just him, but his wife.

UK Finance Minister Sunak, wife Akshata named in list of Britain's super-rich


Rishi Sunak and Akshata Murthy attend a reception to celebrate the British Asian Trust in London. File

Finance Minister Rishi Sunak became the first high-profile British politician to make the Sunday Times Rich List, weeks after his family’s tax arrangements attracted controversy and amid a cost-of-living crisis.

Sunak and his Indian wife Akshata Murty, whose father co-founded the IT behemoth Infosys, made the annual list for the first time with their joint £730 million ($911 million) fortune.

The bulk of their wealth is believed to come from Murty’s £690-million stake in Infosys, but Sunak also had a highly lucrative career in finance before entering politics in 2015.

The listing, which started in 1989, this year estimates the minimum wealth of Britain’s 250 richest people or families, and features far fewer Russian billionaires due to Western sanctions following the invasion of Ukraine.

Sunak’s inclusion comes a month after it was revealed that his wife was sheltered from paying tax on foreign earnings to his Treasury department after claiming so-called non-domiciled status.

The “non-dom” scheme has become controversial in recent years, particularly now that Britons face tax rises and the cost-of-living crisis, with some opposition parties calling for its abolition.

It has been estimated Murty’s non-dom status could have saved her £20 million in taxes on dividends from her shares in Infosys.

Soon after the revelations emerged, she announced she would start paying UK tax on “all worldwide income,” noting that she did not want her tax affairs to be a “distraction” for her husband.

Sunak has also faced persistent criticism for doing too little to help hard-pressed Britons as his once-rosy prospects of succeeding Prime Minister Boris Johnson have ebbed rapidly.

Critics have accused him of hypocrisy for raising taxes on people as various prices surge, while his own family has seen millions of pounds in Infosys dividends shielded from his own Exchequer.

Just this week, he warned in a keynote speech to business leaders that Britons faced a “tough” few months ahead, with inflation confirmed as the highest rate in decades at nine percent.

 

Agence France-Presse



Men at Afghan TV station wear masks to support female colleagues told by Taliban to cover up

As female television anchors are ordered to cover their faces during broadcasts, their male counterparts join them in solidarity

IN KABUL
23 May 2022 
Male staff at Afghanistan's Tolo TV wear face masks to show solidarity with their female colleagues at the Kabul studio 
CREDIT: STRINGER /EPA-EFE/Shutterstock


Male Afghan news presenters wore masks during broadcasts to show solidarity with female colleagues told to cover their faces under new Taliban rules.

Female television anchors were directed to cover their faces from Sunday under an edict from the Taliban's ministry of vice and virtue.

The directive followed a nationwide proclamation that women outside the home should cover their faces, preferably with the burqa. Women who had no important work outside would be better to stay at home, the order said.

Female newsreaders were then told to obey the rules on Thursday. At first only a handful of news outlets complied. But on Sunday, most female anchors were seen with their faces covered.

Male presenters on Tolo, Afghanistan's most popular television network, wore Covid-style surgical masks alongside their female colleagues.

“I can’t breathe nor talk properly – how will I be able to run the program?” said Khatira Ahmadi, a female Tolo news presenter.
Advertisement


Sonia Nizai, a female news anchor, added: “We were not ready mentally and morally that such things would be forced on us. Running three hours of programs with a mask is very difficult.”
 
TV anchor Khatira Ahmadi reads the news while covering her face at Tolo TV's Kabul studio 
CREDIT: STRINGER/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock


Women presenters were previously only required to wear a headscarf. Tolo news director, Khpolwak Sapai, said the channel had been compelled to make its women presenters follow the order.

“I was called on the telephone yesterday and was told in strict words to do it. So, it is not by choice but by force,” Mr Sapai told AFP.

Afghan male journalists also began sharing pictures on social media of themselves wearing masks in solidarity.

Mohammad Akif Sadeq Mohajir, spokesman for the ministry, said: “We are happy with the media channels that they implemented this responsibility in a good manner.”

Women's rights campaigners have accused the Taliban of attempting to erase women from public life in Afghanistan. Girls have been blocked from secondary school and women have been told they cannot travel alone.

Mr Mohajir said the authorities were not against women presenters.

“We have no intention of removing them from the public scene or sidelining them, or stripping them of their right to work,” he said.
The American Killing Fields
May 25, 2022


By Charles M. Blow
Opinion Columnist

The Republican Party has turned America into a killing field.

Republicans have allowed guns to proliferate while weakening barriers to ownership, lowering the age at which one can purchase a weapon and eliminating laws governing how, when and where guns can be carried.

They have done this in part with help from conservatives on the Supreme Court who have upheld a corrupt and bastardized interpretation of the Second Amendment.

But Republicans have also done so by promoting fear and paranoia. They tell people that criminals are coming to menace you, immigrants are coming to menace you, a race war (or racial replacement) is coming to menace you and the government itself may one day come to menace you.

The only defense you have against the menace is to be armed.

If you buy into this line of thinking, owning a gun is not only logical but prudent. It’s like living in a flood plain and buying flood insurance. Of course you should do it.

The propaganda has been incredibly, insidiously persuasive. As Vox pointed out last year, “Americans make up less than 5 percent of the world’s population, yet they own roughly 45 percent of all the world’s privately held firearms,” according to 2018 data.

But once you accept the dogma that a personal arsenal is your last line of defense against an advancing threat, no amount of tragedy can persuade you to relinquish that idea, not even the slaughter of children and their teachers in their classrooms.

Even if you think that shootings like the one in Texas are horrendous, you see yourself and your interests as detached from them. You didn’t do the killing. Your guns are kept safe and secure, possibly even under lock and key. You are a responsible gun owner. The person who did the killing is a lunatic.

Republicans carry this logic in Congress. They offer thoughts and prayers but resist reforms. They offer the same asinine advice: To counter bad guys with guns, we need more good guys with guns. They seem to envision an old-school western in which gunmen square off and the ranger always kills the desperado.

They want to arm teachers, even though most don’t want to be armed. Personally, I can’t imagine any of my elementary-school teachers with a gun in the classroom trying to fend off a gunman. That’s not what they signed up for.

And so Republicans keep the country trapped in a state of intransigence, ricocheting from one tragedy to another. This is not normal, nor is it necessary and inevitable.

No other country has the level of American carnage, but no other country has American Republicans.

The mass shootings are only the tip of the iceberg.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, more than 45,000 people died from gun-related episodes in 2020, the most recorded in this country and a 15 percent increase from the year before. Slightly more than half, 54 percent, were the result of suicide, and 43 percent were the result of homicide.

And still, we do nothing to restrict gun access, or more precisely, Republicans agree to no new restrictions. This is not a both-sides-equally issue. The lion’s share of the resistance to passing federal gun safety laws falls squarely on Republican shoulders. We have to call a fig a fig and a trough a trough.

Beginning to pass gun safety wouldn’t immediately end all gun violence in this country, but it could begin to lower the body count, to lessen the amount of blood flowing in the streets.

Republicans have no intention of helping in that regard. Too often, they seem to see the carnage as collateral — as if they could use the constancy and repetition of these killings to scuttle efforts to stop future killings. Some Republicans may even count on Americans getting used to inaction, getting inured to the killing of children, getting numb to the relentless taking of life and no taking of action.

So we go through the cycle yet again — the wailing of loved ones, the sadness of a country. We call the victims’ names and learn a little about their lives before they were cut down. Maybe this one liked ice cream or that one liked to dress up like a princess. We ask: If not now, when? If not for this, then for what? We listen to Democrats condemn and Republicans deflect.

And before we can fully mourn one massacre, another one happens. It was just over a week ago that a white supremacist terrorist gunned down 13 people in a Buffalo grocery store. In fact, according to the Gun Violence Archive, there were 611 mass shootings in the United States in 2020. That’s not only more than one a day; it’s approaching two a day. (The archive defines a mass shooting as one in which four or more people were shot or killed, not including the shooter.)

There is no great mystery about why we are where we are in this country when it comes to gun violence. We shouldn’t — and must not — pretend that this issue is complicated. It’s not.

We are not addressing our insane gun culture and the havoc it is wreaking because the Republican Party refuses to cooperate. There is death all around us, but for too many Republicans, it is a sad inconvenience rather than impetus for action.

PHOTO Credit...Kaylee Greenlee for The New York Times







Despite push for school safety policies after Texas shooting, research shows they do little

By Sean Boynton
Global News
Posted May 25, 2022

WATCH: 'You are doing nothing': Agony and anger rise in aftermath of Uvalde, Texas school shooting



Safety policies designed to protect schools from mass shootings have done little to deter them and may even be harmful to students, research shows, despite a renewed push for such measures in the wake of Tuesday’s shooting in Texas.

The 18-year-old gunman who killed at least 19 children and two teachers at a Uvalde elementary school was able to evade armed police officers and other security protocols already in place. Yet some U.S. lawmakers are arguing those policies are needed, and should be reinforced, instead of pursuing meaningful gun control.

“We have years of data suggesting that these measures, while they have been impacting school outcomes, they haven’t been necessarily changing the trajectories or the trends in actual injury and deaths,” said Odis Johnson, executive director of the Johns Hopkins Center for Safe and Healthy Schools in Washington, D.C.

Johnson and other researchers have found evidence that school safety policies — including on-campus police officers, metal detectors, and increased surveillance systems like security cameras — have a negative impact on education itself.

Students at schools that rely on such policies for safety often achieve lower test scores and rates of college admission compared to other schools, the research suggests.

One representative study released last year, which was co-authored by Johnson, found students at “high-surveillance” schools were more likely to face in-school suspension, achieved lower math scores and were less likely to attend college than students at “low-surveillance” schools.

The study also found such safety protocols predominantly impacted racialized students, with Black students four times as likely to attend schools considered “high-surveillance.”

2:28Texas school shooting puts Sandy Hook tragedy, fight for U.S. gun control back in focus


Meanwhile, gun violence at schools is on the rise in the U.S. The National Center for Education Statistics has found the number of school shootings resulting in injuries or death has increased steadily over the last seven years.

There have been 137 shooting incidents at schools so far this year — almost one a day — and there were 249 last year, according to David Riedman, lead researcher at the K-12 School Shooting Database at the Naval Postgraduate School’s Center for Homeland Defense and Security. It tracks every incident in which a gun is brandished or fired or a bullet hits school property.


“What is becoming more prevalent is systematic gun violence at schools is dramatically increasing, especially at high schools. This is due to students carrying weapons and conflicts escalating to the point of gun violence,” Riedman told Reuters.


Johnson says school safety measures do not address the prevalence of guns in the country and the ease with which people can access them, including the Uvalde shooter, who purchased the weapons used in the massacre shortly after his 18th birthday.

They also don’t necessarily stop people outside a school from entering and opening fire.

“What is needed is an understanding that schools are embedded within communities and cities that have a problem with gun control,” he said.

In the wake of the 2018 shooting at Santa Fe High School that killed 10 people and wounded 13 others, Texas lawmakers focused instead on improving school safety, including mandatory emergency training for all school employees and improved mental health care for students.

1:21 ‘You are doing nothing’: Beto O’Rourke interrupts Texas governor’s remarks on school shooting

A new state law, which passed in 2019, required school districts to create “threat assessment teams” for every campus as well as “bleeding control stations,” which are essentially battlefield tourniquet kits in schools.

On Tuesday, Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick continued to insist that schools need to be further secured, telling Fox News that officials must “harden these targets so nobody can get in.”



Other Republican lawmakers in Texas and elsewhere used similar language while speaking to conservative media on Tuesday and Wednesday. Attorney General Ken Paxton called for arming teachers, while Texas Sen. Ted Cruz said more armed police officers are needed on campuses.

Cruz also suggested on Wednesday that schools should only “have one door into and out of the school” that is protected by armed officers, doing away with other entry points. He also mentioned bulletproof windows and doors were needed.



Robb Elementary — the small elementary school in Uvalde, a heavily Latino community, where Tuesday’s shooting took place — has four armed police officers stationed on campus as part of its two-page list of preventative safety measures. Other measures include a threat assessment team, multiple on-campus police officers, security cameras and metal detectors.

Officials say one of the officers stationed at the school exchanged gunfire with the shooter, who still managed to make his way inside the school to kill students and teachers. The shooter was wearing tactical gear, according to official reports.

Johnson said focusing more on common sense gun control would also help those officers.

“I don’t know of a police officer out there who believes that their job is easier with more guns on the street, and easier access to those guns, and less responsibility in making sure they’re secured from young people,” he said.

Securing schools has also proven to be a profitable industry, reaching $2.7 billion in revenue in 2017, according to market research firm Omdia. The firm predicted then that revenue would grow to $2.8 billion by 2021, but the COVID-19 pandemic led to a drop in spending.

Yet in 2018, a Washington Post survey of schools that had experienced a shooting in the six years since the massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary in Newtown, Conn., found only one school that suggested such safety measures could have made a difference.

Johnson suggests lawmakers who are pushing school safety measures ahead of gun reform “haven’t caught up to these more recent trends” in his research and gun violence statistics, which has been available for years.


“I don’t know how long the lag has to be before lawmakers get the message that recent events suggest a change in approach is necessary,” he said.

— With files from Reuters
 
 




Deadline

Michael Moore Tells MSNBC’s Chris Hayes, “It’s Time To Repeal The Second Amendment”

Tom Tapp - 
© MSNBC via Twitter

“Who will say on this network or any other network in the next few days, ‘It’s time to repeal the Second Amendment’?” Michael Moore asked MSNBC host Chris Hayes today.

“Oh, you can’t say that,” he imagined Americans replying.

“Well why not?” asked Moore.
The Oscar-winning Bowling for Columbine filmmaker posed the question as the nation was still reeling from the school massacre in Uvalde, Texas yesterday in which 19 children and two adults were killed.

“Look, I support all gun control legislation. Not sensible gun control. We don’t need the sensible stuff. We need the hardcore stuff that’s going to protect ourselves and our children,” he said.

“We won’t acknowledge that we are a violent people to begin with. This country was birthed in violence with the genocide of the native people at the barrel of a gun. This country was built on the back of slaves with a gun to their back…We do not want to acknowledge our two original sins here that have a gun behind our ability to become who we became,” he told Hayes.

“I truly believe if Jefferson, Madison and Washington if they all knew that the bullet would be invented — some 50 years after our revolution, I don’t know if they would have written it that way. They didn’t even know what a bullet was. It didn’t exist until the 1830s. [If] they had any idea that there would be this kind of carnage, you have to believe that the Founders of the country would not support it.”



‘American Pie’ Singer Don McLean Pulls Out Of NRA Gig Following Texas Shooting



ET Canada

Brent Furdyk - 
© Photo by Jason Kempin/Getty Images

The upcoming National Rifle Association conference can say bye bye to Don McLean, who was scheduled to perform at the event but has announced he's cancelling in light of the horrific school shooting in Uvalde, Texas.

In a statement to TMZ, the "American Pie" singer explained why he couldn't, in good conscience, perform at the NRA event to be held in Houston this weekend, just 250 miles away from Uvalde.

"In light of the recent events in Texas, I have decided it would be disrespectful and hurtful for me to perform for the NRA at their convention in Houston this week," said McLean.

"I’m sure all the folks planning to attend this event are shocked and sickened by these events as well. After all, we are all Americans," he added.

"I share the sorrow for this terrible, cruel loss with the rest of the nation," McLean concluded.

Other performers scheduled to entertain attendees at the NRA conference include Larry Gatlin, Lee Greenwood and Danielle Peck.

Avian influenza’s arrival in Alaska signals danger for other parts of the world

BY:  - MAY 22, 2022      

 A bald eagle perched in a tree in Sitka National Historical Park is lethargic and drooping. Sitka resident Larry Pouliot called the Alaska Raptor Center about the bird, which died a couple of hours later of highly pathogenic avian influenza. (Photo by Larry Pouliot/Courtesy of Alaska Beacon)

When Larry Pouliot went on a morning walk in Sitka National Historical Park on May 9, he spotted a lethargic, unresponsive bald eagle perched in a tree, its eyes bloodshot and its neck drooping.

“I realized he was not doing great,” said Pouliot, who got video footage and photos of the ailing bird.

He called the Alaska Raptor Center, a local bird rescue and rehabilitation facility. Within a couple of hours, Pouliot said, center responders who had been summoned to the site watched the eagle fall from the tree. It then died.

That was a confirmed case of the highly pathogenic avian influenza that has swept through poultry farms and wild bird populations worldwide and moved westward from the Atlantic coasts of Canada and the United States.

The arrival in Alaska of this unusually lethal strain, first confirmed last month by a case in a backyard chicken flock in the Matanuska-Susitna Borough and later documented among wild birds from the Aleutians to southeast Alaska, is a potentially ominous sign for the rest of the world.

Why avian influenza in Alaska is a problem

Alaska is both a reservoir and a distribution hub for avian influenza viruses. Each year, millions of birds migrate here from Asia, North America, South America, Australia and even Antarctica, converging to feed and breed in the near-continuous daylight. They crowd together, creating opportunities for viruses to exchange genetic material and get rearranged.

“Mutations can mix things up, quite literally, so that’s a concern,” said Andy Ramey, a U.S. Geological Survey wildlife geneticist who is an expert on avian influenza. Come fall, “as birds disperse, they can bring viruses with them, leading to outbreaks in new areas or new regions.”

The part of the world that scientists call Beringia – which encompasses the spot where Alaska nearly touches Siberia – is the usual pathway for Asian avian influenza viruses to enter North America. That was the case in 2014 and 2015, the last time a wave of highly pathogenic virus swept through U.S. and Canadian bird populations.

This time, the virus – linked to the Guangdong strain first identified in China in 1996 — appears to have moved west and been carried to the East Coast over the Atlantic. It was documented last year in the eastern Canadian provinces and possibly carried through an unusual assemblage of birds in that part of the world. By now, Ramey said, it is likely that the virus is moving around the world through various pathways and in various directions.

Along with Alaska’s geographic position as the bullseye for several migratory bird flyways, the state has other characteristics that make it a globally significant avian influenza site.

“The one thing about influenza viruses, especially avian influenza viruses, is they like a wet and cold environment,” said Bob Gerlach, Alaska’s state veterinarian.

Ramey’s research has found that influenza viruses can survive for more than a year in Alaska’s wetlands.

While wild birds in Alaska and elsewhere commonly carry low-pathogenic virus strains, which generally cause little harm, the spread within the wild population of high-pathogenic viruses is a significant change from the past, Ramey said.

Until now, only one case of a wild Alaska bird

Until about 20 years ago, highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses were thought to be solely a problem for domestic poultry. Before 2002, there was only one documented case of a wild bird infected with a highly pathogenic virus, he said. And until now, the sole documented case of a wild Alaska bird infected with a highly pathogenic virus came from a mallard found in 2016 in Creamer’s Field in Fairbanks.

“So this is kind of new territory,” Ramey said. “Now we have high-path influenza that’s persisting and being maintained in wild birds.”

Just why that is happening is the subject of much research. Some scientists have warned that climate change, which is accentuated in Alaska, is shifting migration patterns and creating new assemblages of bird species in their Beringian summer gathering sites, thus increasing the risks of influenza spread.

For now, it appears unlikely that this influenza will have population-level effects on Alaska’s wild birds, Ramey said.

So far, known infections in Alaska are mostly among eagles and Canada geese. Raptors seem to be vulnerable, in Alaska and elsewhere, possibly because they are eating sick or dead birds that carry the virus, Ramey said.

Avian influenzas are generally more common among waterbirds found in freshwater systems – geese, ducks and swans – than in seabirds, including those species that have been hit by successive years of die-offs in the Bering Sea region, he said.

There are 28 Alaska species that the USGS, though its past work on avian influenza, has designated as high priority for monitoring.

Species of special concern worldwide, Ramey said, are those with relatively low numbers. In Alaska, that includes two species listed as threatened, Steller’s eiders and spectacled eiders, he said.

As for the sightings of sick and dead birds to date, eagles and geese may be dominating simply because they are the most visible birds, Gerlach said. “Some of these other dabbling ducks are small, and if they do die and get swept to the side they may not be as noticeable,” he said.

The arrival of highly pathogenic influenza right after the bird die-offs is unfortunate, even if some species are more vulnerable than others, Gerlach said. “In this case, this is another stressor on the population, and what impacts it’s going to have will be really unknown,” he said.

Jumping across species

Also yet unknown is how this strain might spread beyond birds.

Avian influenzas have jumped across species in the past, including to marine mammals, Gerlach pointed out. This year, federal biologists will be looking for the virus in Alaska’s marine mammals, he said.

There is already precedent for this virus to spill over into mammals. Foxes in the upper Midwest and Canada have been found with this virus, including a kit found dead in Ontario.

In Alaska, biologists will be watching this year for potential spread to marine mammals, among other animals, Gerlach said.

As for humans, so far only two people have tested positive for this avian influenza, one in the United Kingdom and one in the U.S., according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

It is rare for avian influenza viruses to harm human health, experts say. But when that happens, the results can be devastating.

The deadly pandemic that started in 1918 and killed at least 50 million people was caused by a virus that originated in birds, scientists say. More recent severe influenza pandemics have also been caused by avian viruses, including the 1957 Asian flu and the 1968 Hong Kong flu, according to the CDC.

About this story

This story was originally published by the Alaska Beacon. The Beacon is part of States Newsroom, a network of news bureaus supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Alaska Beacon maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Andrew Kitchenman for questions: info@alaskabeacon.com. Follow Alaska Beacon on Facebook and Twitter.