Monday, June 13, 2022

BOZO BOJO BREAKS OWN BREXIT AGREEMENT
UK moves to rewrite Brexit rules; EU threatens legal action

Jun 13, 2022

 Demonstrators protest outside Hillsborough Castle, ahead of a visit by British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, in Hillsborough, Northern Ireland, Monday, May, 16, 2022. Britain’s government is expected to introduce legislation that would unilaterally change post-Brexit trade rules for Northern Ireland amid opposition from lawmakers who believe the move violates international law. The legislation, expected Monday, June 13, 2022, would let the government bypass the so-called Northern Ireland Protocol, which requires the inspection of some goods shipped there from other parts of the United Kingdom.
 (AP Photo/Peter Morrison, File)


LONDON (AP) — Britain’s government on Monday proposed new legislation that would unilaterally change post-Brexit trade rules for Northern Ireland, despite opposition from some U.K. lawmakers and EU officials who say the move violates international law.

The proposed bill seeks to remove customs checks on some goods entering Northern Ireland from the rest of the U.K. That will override parts of the trade treaty that Prime Minister Boris Johnson signed with the European Union less than two years ago.

British Foreign Secretary Liz Truss maintained that Britain is acting within international law, and blamed the EU for blocking a negotiated settlement. The European Commission said it could take legal action against the U.K.

European Commission Vice President Maros Sefcovic said the EU’s executive arm will consider launching new infringement procedures to “protect the EU single market from the risks that the violation of the protocol creates for EU businesses and for the health and safety of EU citizens.”

In Ireland, Prime Minister Micheal Martin said it was “very regrettable for a country like the U.K. to renege on an international treaty.”

Brushing aside criticism, Johnson told reporters that the proposed change is “relatively simple to do.”

“Frankly, it’s a relatively trivial set of adjustments in the grand scheme of things,” he told LBC Radio.

He argued that his government’s “higher and prior legal commitment” is to the 1998 Good Friday agreement that brought peace and stability to Northern Ireland.

Arrangements for Northern Ireland — the only part of the U.K. that shares a land border with an EU nation — have proved the thorniest issue in Britain’s divorce from the bloc, which became final at the end of 2020. At the center of the dispute is the Northern Ireland Protocol, which now regulates trade ties between Northern Ireland, which is part of the U.K., and the Republic of Ireland, part of the EU.

Britain and the EU agreed in their Brexit deal that the Irish land border would be kept free of customs posts and other checks because an open border is a key pillar of the peace process that ended decades of violence in Northern Ireland.

Instead, to protect the EU’s single market, there are checks on some goods, such as meat and eggs, entering Northern Ireland from the rest of the U.K.

But the arrangement has proved politically damaging for Johnson because it treats Northern Ireland differently from the rest of the United Kingdom. Northern Ireland’s Democratic Unionist Party has refused to return to the region’s power-sharing government until the protocol is scrapped or substantially changed.

The bill to override that arrangement is expected to face opposition in Parliament, including from members of Johnson’s own Conservative ranks. Critics say unilaterally changing the protocol would be illegal and would damage Britain’s standing with other countries because it’s part of a treaty considered binding under international law.

In Brussels, Sefcovic said the protocol was the “one and only solution we could jointly find to protect the hard-earned gains of the peace process in Northern Ireland.”

He added that the EU remains open to discussions with the British government to find a solution to the dispute.

__

Associated Press reporter Samuel Petrequin in Brussels contributed to this story.

___

Follow AP’s coverage of Brexit at https://apnews.com/hub/brexit

Copyright © The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


EU could take legal action against UK as soon as Wednesday in response to NI Protocol moves

"The UK government know all this, sadly, I don't think they care", one person tweeted in response.



 by Jack Peat
2022-06-13 
in Politics

Credit:PA

The European Union could take legal action against the UK as soon as Wednesday in response to moves to re-write parts of the Northern Ireland Protocol, according to RTE News reports.

A Bill to unilaterally amend the agreement will be introduced in Parliament amid controversy over whether the legislation will break international law.

Northern Ireland secretary Brandon Lewis has insisted the new Bill is “lawful” and “correct” but Labour has accused the Government of “law-breaking”.

There is also likely to be some opposition from within Tory ranks, with a number of MPs believed to be unhappy with the legislation.

The Financial Times reported that an internal note had been circulating among those against the Bill, which said: “Breaking international law to rip up the Prime Minister’s own treaty is damaging to everything the UK and Conservatives stand for.”

It is also expected to prompt a fierce response from the EU, which could initiate legal action as early as Wednesday.


RTE News reporter Tony Connelly said that a statement is expected to say that the EU will not renegotiate the Protocol, and will imply that the EU could take retaliatory trade measures against the UK.

The bloc will “consider” issuing “new” infringement proceedings, as well as unfreezing existing legal action this week.

Sources say the EU will adopt a carrot and stick approach, with the unfreezing of legal action being accompanied by the publication of a “model for the flexible implementation of the protocol based on durable solutions.”



UK sets up EU showdown with plan to change Northern Ireland trade rules

Issued on: 13/06/2022
Text by: NEWS WIRES



The UK government on Monday introduced legislation to rip up post-Brexit trading rules for Northern Ireland, despite the possibility that could spark a trade war with the EU.

London says it still prefers a negotiated outcome with the European Union to reform the Northern Ireland Protocol.

But with talks stalled, the bill proposes overriding the EU withdrawal treaty that the UK signed, although the government in London insists it is not breaking international law.

The EU quickly threatened legal action in response while Dublin called it "a particular low point in the UK's approach to Brexit".

That could not come at a worse time for the UK, which is grappling with inflation at 40-year highs and rising household bills that have left many Britons struggling to make ends meet.

But London claims the bill will address "burdensome customs processes, inflexible regulation, tax and spend discrepancies and democratic governance issues" that are "undermining" peace in Northern Ireland and have paralysed its power-sharing government.

"The EU must be willing to change the protocol itself. Ministers believe that the serious situation in Northern Ireland means they cannot afford to delay," it added.
'Reasonable'

Foreign Secretary Liz Truss spoke to European Commission Vice President Maros Sefcovic and Ireland counterpart Simon Coveney on Monday to inform them the bill was being introduced in parliament.

She called it a "reasonable, practical solution to the problems facing Northern Ireland".

But Sefcovic said that the EU would not renegotiate its divorce deal and that Brussels would now consider reopening a suspended "infringement procedure" against Britain, as well as opening fresh cases.

"It is with significant concern that we take note of today's decision by the UK Government to table legislation," he said in a prepared statement to reporters in Brussels.

Sefcovic tweeted earlier that he had warned the UK minister that "unilateral action is damaging to mutual trust and a formula for uncertainty".

Coveney told Truss the move marked "a particular low point in the UK's approach to Brexit" and was "deeply damaging to relationships on these islands and between the UK and EU".

"The UK's unilateral approach is not in the best interest of Northern Ireland and does not have the consent or support of the majority of people or business in Northern Ireland," he added.

But Prime Minister Boris Johnson insisted that the move was "the right way forward" and was needed to maintain the "balance and the symmetry" of the Good Friday peace agreement between pro-UK unionists and nationalists who want a united Ireland.

"One community at the moment feels very, very estranged from the way things are operating, very alienated. And we've just got to fix that," he told LBC radio.
Open border

The pro-UK Democratic Unionist Party argues that the protocol's creation of an effective border in the Irish Sea is jeopardising Northern Ireland's status in the wider UK and makes a united Ireland more likely.

It is boycotting the local government in Belfast until the deal is scrapped or dramatically overhauled.

Northern Ireland's first minister-elect, Michelle O'Neill, of Irish nationalists Sinn Fein, said Johnson was "in clear breach of international law".


Analysis: UK sets up EU battle with Northern Ireland changes

But DUP leader Jeffrey Donaldson welcomed the bill as "the kind of action that is required" to remove what he said were barriers to trade within the UK.

The protocol requires checks on goods arriving from England, Scotland and Wales, to prevent them from entering the EU's single market via the Republic of Ireland and to avoid a return to a "hard border".

Border infrastructure was a flashpoint during 30 years of violence over British rule in Northern Ireland and an open border was central to the peace deal.
Green and red channels

The UK bill proposes scrapping most of the checks, creating a "green channel" for British traders to send goods to Northern Ireland without making any customs declaration to the EU.

The EU would have access to more real-time UK data on the flow of goods, and only businesses intending to trade into the single market via Ireland would be required to make declarations via a "red channel".

The EU would need to trust the UK to monitor the flow, London said, promising "robust penalties" for any companies seeking to abuse the new system.

Since recently surviving a confidence vote in his leadership, Johnson has reportedly been under pressure from pro-Brexit Tory hardliners to toughen the bill and remove oversight of the protocol by the European Court of Justice.

Northern Ireland minister Brandon Lewis said there was "no logic" to having only one side's judges involved in a bilateral trade arrangement, but ECJ's jurisdiction is a red line for the EU to protect its single market.

(AFP)


Explainer: What is in Britain's proposed new post-Brexit law for N.Ireland

Reuters


Traffic drives through the border between Northern Ireland and Ireland along the M1 motorway, as seen from Carrickcarnan, Ireland, May 19, 2022. 
REUTERS/Clodagh Kilcoyne

LONDON, June 13 (Reuters) - Britain published legislation on Monday to tackle disruption to post-Brexit trade with Northern Ireland, setting out measures it says are needed to protect peace in the British-ruled province but which are sure to antagonise the European Union.

The government sees the legislation as part of a "dual track" approach to the problem, enabling ministers to pursue negotiations with the EU while having an insurance policy in the form of the new bill if those talks fails to come to fruition.

Following are the reasons why Britain wants to unilaterally change the Northern Ireland protocol, agreed as part of its Brexit divorce deal with the EU, and what it has proposed.

WHAT IS THE NORTHERN IRELAND PROTOCOL?


-- The protocol is an arrangement agreed as part of Britain's Brexit deal that keeps Northern Ireland aligned with the EU's single market for goods, avoiding a hard border with EU member Ireland that was a key part of a peace deal.

-- It brought in checks on goods moving between Britain and Northern Ireland, deterring traders from delivering certain products to the province.

JUSTIFICATION FOR THE LEGISLATION

-- Foreign minister Liz Truss said on May 17 the Belfast Good Friday Agreement peace deal was under strain, preventing the working of the Northern Ireland executive.

-- This argument has formed the basis of the government's legal justification. It believes the conditions have been reached to justify the "doctrine of necessity", which allows an administrative authority to employ extraconstitutional measures to restore order or stability.

-- Britain says the new legislation is legal under international law. It says it will not scrap the protocol deal but make limited changes.

PROBLEMS


-- EU customs procedures for moving goods within the UK have meant companies are facing significant costs and paperwork. Some businesses have stopped this trade altogether.

-- Rules on taxation mean that citizens in Northern Ireland are unable to benefit fully from the same advantages as the rest of the UK, like the reduction in VAT on solar panels.

-- SPSS (sanitary and phytosanitary) rules mean British producers face onerous requirements including veterinary certification to sell food stuffs in Northern Irish shops.

-- The EU has made proposals to ease the burden for traders but Britain says they do not address the full concerns and would go backwards from the current situation.

NEW LEGISLATION

-- Britain wants to introduce green and red lanes backed by commercial data and a trusted trader scheme for goods, with the green lane for products staying in the UK, and red for those going to the EU or being moved by traders not in the trader scheme. Post and parcels would go through the green lane.

-- To protect the EU's single market, it would implement robust penalties for those who seek to abuse the system.

-- Robust data sharing and a purpose-built IT system with information available in real time and well within the time taken to cross the Irish Sea would be available.

-- It would also remove regulatory barriers to goods made to UK standards being sold in Northern Ireland. Goods could be marked with either a CE or UKCA marking or both if they meet the relevant rules. Approval could be granted by UK or EU bodies.

-- Britain wants to allow businesses to choose between meeting UK and EU standards in a new dual regulatory regime.

-- London will be able to decide tax and spend policies across the whole of the UK. Britain proposes using the Subsidy Control Act 2022 to manage subsidies in the UK. Britain would provide freedom for ministers to adapt or disapply rules so that people in Northern Ireland could benefit from the same policies as those elsewhere in the UK.

-- It would address issues related to governance by bringing the protocol in line with international norms and removing the dominance of the European Court of Justice. Britain proposes more balanced arrangements that look to manage issues through dialogue, and then through independent arbitration.

HOW LONG WILL IT TAKE?

-- Britain says it needs to deal with the trade issues as a matter of urgency but there is no legislative timetable.

-- It is likely to meet resistance in the upper house of parliament. One Conservative lawmaker said the rarely-used Parliament Acts could be utilised to force it through. This limits the delaying powers of the House of Lords to a year.



Britain defies EU with 'relatively trivial' N.Ireland law

Elizabeth Piper and Kate Holton
Sun, June 12, 2022, 

FILE PHOTO: The border between Northern Ireland and Ireland

FILE PHOTO: The border between Northern Ireland and Ireland


FILE PHOTO: British Foreign Secretary Truss gives a statement to the House of Commons in London


EU Commission Vice-President for Interinstitutional Relations Sefcovic



By Elizabeth Piper and Kate Holton

LONDON (Reuters) -Britain published plans on Monday to override some of the post-Brexit trade rules for Northern Ireland by scrapping checks and challenging the role played by the European Union's court in a new clash with Brussels.

Despite Ireland describing the move as a "new low" and Brussels talking of damaged trust, Britain pressed ahead with what Prime Minister Boris Johnson suggested were "relatively trivial" steps to improve trade and reduce bureaucracy.

European Commission Vice President Maros Sefcovic said that Brussels' reaction would be proportionate, but ruled out renegotiating the trade protocol.

Tensions have been simmering for months after Britain accused the bloc of heavy-handed approach to the movement of goods between Britain and Northern Ireland - checks needed to keep an open border with EU-member Ireland.

Always the toughest part of the Brexit deal, the situation in the region has sent alarm bells ringing in European capitals and Washington, and among business leaders. It has also heightened political tensions, with pro-British communities saying their place in the United Kingdom is being eroded.

"I'm very willing to negotiate with the EU, but they do have to be willing to change the terms of this agreement which are causing these very severe problems in Northern Ireland," British Foreign Secretary Liz Truss said.

"We're completely serious about this legislation."

Britain has pointed to the breakdown of a power-sharing administration in Northern Ireland as a reason for drafting the legislation, the first step in what could be a months-long process before the bill becomes law.

The legal advice cited the "doctrine of necessity", which is invoked when governments may take law-breaking action to protect stability, as the foundation for the move, saying the conditions had been met because of the situation in Northern Ireland.

Britain has long complained that negotiations with the EU have failed to come to fruition and the legislation is seen as an insurance policy, and possibly a bargaining chip. The bill could accommodate any solution agreed in those talks.

But a new trade row with the EU comes at a time when Britain faces its toughest economic conditions in decades, with inflation forecast to hit 10% and growth stalling. Johnson said any talk of a trade war would be a "gross, gross overreaction".

The EU's Sefcovic said the bloc will not renegotiate the protocol and called the idea "unrealistic".

"Any renegotiation would simply bring further legal uncertainty for people and businesses in Northern Ireland," Sefcovic said in a statement.

"Our aim will always be to secure the implementation of the Protocol. Our reaction to unilateral action by the UK will reflect that aim and will be proportionate."

NEW CLASH


Britain has long threatened to rip up the protocol, an agreement that kept the region under some EU rules and drew an effective customs border between Northern Ireland and the rest of the UK to prevent a back door for goods to enter the EU's vast single market.

It is now planning a "green channel" for goods moving from Britain to Northern Ireland, to change tax rules and end the European Court of Justice's role as sole arbiter in disputes. It also wants a dual regulatory regime, angering companies which fear higher costs.

The move has yet again exposed divisions in Johnson's Conservative Party, a week after the prime minister just survived a rebellion by his own lawmakers.

Brexit supporters said it could have gone further, critics feared it again undermined London's standing in the world by challenging an international agreement.

Similar divisions were evident in Northern Ireland.

Brussels believes any unilateral change may breach international law, while Irish foreign minister Simon Coveney said that only the British government thought it was not a breach.

The EU could launch legal action or eventually review the terms of the free trade deal it agreed with Britain. It has already thrown doubt on Britain's role within the $99 billion Horizon Europe research programme.

The United States urged Britain and the EU to resolve their differences, adding that it sought to protect the 1998 peace deal for the province.

"U.S. priority remains protecting the gains of the Belfast/Good Friday Agreement, and preserving peace, stability, and prosperity for the people of Northern Ireland," a White House spokesperson said.

($1 = 0.9553 euros)

(Additional reporting by Paul Sandle, Andrew MacAskill, William James, Alistair Smout and Kylie MacLellan in London, Marine Strauss and Benoit Van Overstraeten in Brussels, Padraic Halpin in Dublin and Alexandra Alper in Washington; Editing by Louise Heavens, Mark Potter, Ed Osmond, William Maclean and Tomasz Janowski)
USA / CANADA 

‘Bloodbath’ in store for Canadian tech sector as wave of layoffs looms, industry players say

‘Bloodbath’ in store for Canadian tech sector as wave of layoffs looms, industry players say
Tech Layoffs In 2022: The U.S. Companies That Have Cut Jobs

Sophia Kunthara
June 6, 2022

After a banner year for tech, layoffs are here. In fact, as of the beginning of June, more than 17,000 workers in the U.S. tech sector have been laid off in mass job cuts so far in 2022, according to a Crunchbase News tally.

Tech companies as big as Netflix have slashed jobs this year, with some citing the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and others pointing to overhiring during periods of rapid growth. RobinhoodGlossier and Better are just a few of the tech companies that have notably trimmed their headcount in 2022.



To keep tabs, we’ve compiled a list of U.S.-based tech companies that have laid off employees so far this year.

New additions in the past week include Carbon HealthLoom, and Policygenius.

Most recently updated: June 6, 2022 SEE

Notable U.S. tech layoffs are included below. Please note that layoff and workforce figures are best estimates based on reporting. Columns are searchable and sortable.
The public markets have been hit hard in 2022, and that’s trickled down to the private markets. Inflation concerns, rising interest rates and geopolitical issues have all contributed to a roller coaster stock market.

Startups—especially the ones who benefited from a pandemic boom that’s starting to cool—are starting to feel the pressure too. Valuations, particularly at the late stage, have started to dip, and startups say it’s much more difficult to raise new funding in this environment.

Methodology


We’ve included both startups and publicly traded companies that are based in the U.S. We’ve also included companies based elsewhere that have a sizable team in the United States, such as Klarna, even when it’s unclear how much of the U.S. workforce has been affected by layoffs.

We sourced the layoffs from media reports, social media posts and layoffs.fyi, a crowdsourced database of tech layoffs.
Are we missing something?

Our hope is that this database will be as comprehensive as possible, so if we’ve missed any companies or if your company goes through layoffs, please let us know by filling out this form.

This layoff tracker will be updated at least weekly, if not more frequently.




A wave of layoffs hits tech


By Theunis Bates, Editor at LinkedIn News

Updated 2 weeks ago

The tech sector has had a tumultuous year. That trouble is now starting to translate into layoffs, with venture capital-backed firms being hit especially hard as investors abandon risky bets and seek immediate returns. So far this week, firms including fintech unicorns Bolt and Klarna and delivery startups Gorillas and Getir have announced workforce cuts. Tech giants such as Netflix and PayPal are also shedding jobs, while Uber, Lyft, Snap and Meta have slowed hiring.



Jake Heisler, CFP®• 3rd+Principal | Host of Wealth Mgt Mixtape Podcast2w •
2 weeks ago



VC is tightening their belts, and instructing their founders to do the same.

Unemployment is at VERY low levels (see chart).

The easiest way to tighten? Reduce labor expenses (aka layoffs) to lengthen the runway. While this is never a welcome sight, it is part of a normal economic cycle.

From Kenrick Cai: this might present some opportunities for young tech companies to poach some talent - https://lnkd.in/gjj4eHtK

#layoffs #venturecapital #founders #economics #startup

Activate to view larger image


Ramona Schindelheim
• 3rd+Journalist, Writer, Producer, Moderator, & Podcast Host2w •
2 weeks ago


There are about 10 million people in the tech industry in the U.S.

Half work for full-on tech companies, but sometime not even in a tech role – think customer service, administration, finance, sales, etc. The other half fill tech roles – IT, data analysis, cybersecurity, etc. – at companies in which technology is not their core business.

Despite "big tech" layoffs, many employers are desperate for tech talent, according to Todd Thibodeaux, president and CEO of CompTIA

“We see all over the world, there are just big gaps in talent pools where companies need more people. And it's not just the big-name companies. That's the misnomer about tech employment. A lot of times, the media will focus on Silicon Valley and use that as a proxy for the tech industry and employment,” Thibodeaux tells me in an interview for Work in Progress: A WorkingNation Podcast, out next Tuesday.

“You see some layoffs, which are happening in some companies now, and you're starting to see some people slowing their hiring, that's not the case in the rest of the tech employment space. You have lots of medium- and small-sized companies who are dying for talent, and they're not slowing down their hiring at all,” he adds.

You can listen to my full interview with Todd Thibodeaux Tuesday. Download the Work in Progress podcast wherever you get your podcasts or listen at our WorkingNation website. https://lnkd.in/ghU2U24M



A wave of layoffs hits tech

Market turmoil and an investor pullback are leading to job cuts at tech firms, with VC-backed startups and industry leaders all announcing layoffs and hiring freezes.View news story




Susanna Vogel(She/Her) • 3rd+Reporter, HR Brew2w •
2 weeks ago


In this week alone, at least 16 companies laid off more than 7,000 tech employees worldwide. As I was writing this story, we had to revise that count twice to keep pace with what felt at times like a cascade of layoff announcements.

Layoffs are tough news to absorb even as an outsider—so how did leadership announce the decision to individuals who were losing their livelihoods? We took a look.

https://lnkd.in/gvBWbbmw
#layoffs #tech #hr

​​Miss Palestine wears prison uniform to highlight Palestinian suffering in Israeli prisons

Gofran Sawalha
13 June 2022 
 
Miss Palestine, Lauren Imseeh, wore a prisoner jumpsuit to the “Miss Global” beauty pageant, to highlight the suffering of Palestinian detainees in Israeli prisons.
Ukrainian high school grads pose for photoshoot in war-torn Chernihiv

Ukrainian high graduates return to bombed-out Chernihiv for yearbook photoshoot


By Joshua Rhett Miller
June 13, 2022
Updated

A group of high school graduates in war-ravaged Ukraine used damaged buildings and destroyed vehicles as a haunting backdrop for their graduation shots.

Photographer Stanislav Senyk, 25, told Reuters he wanted to document the “very important story” of roughly 40 graduating seniors from schools in Chernihiv in northern Ukraine after witnessing the first-hand horrors of the war now in its fourth month.

“And I’m sure it was very important to capture that in the memory,” he said. “And 10-15 years from now, when they have their own children, they can show those pictures to them.”

One chilling photo showed a group of students huddled atop a tank, looking out with stoic faces with graduation sashes across their chests. Another showed a group of girls standing in a blown-out building, with others looking down from decimated floors above.

“Seeing it in person is a special feeling that cannot be described,” Senyk told Reuters. “But I was dominated by a different feeling. I saw the children who were there and it was like some kind of surrealism going on.”

One of the students, Olha Babynets, 17, said she enjoyed the photoshoot, even if it was “very difficult” for everyone involved

.

A student poses for a high school graduation photoshoot, as Russia’s attack on Ukraine continues, in Chernihiv, Ukraine.Instagram/@senykstas/Handout via REUTERS
Each class involved offered up different locations for the photoshoot according to the Students.via REUTERS

“But we wanted to show that we live in such realities and it is like that for us,” she told Reuters. “No, we wanted to show our pain, which is there and has never subsided. It was difficult emotionally, but we tried to hold on. And I think we managed to do that.”

Some of the students even grabbed spent bullet casings at the scenes, Senyk said.

The photographs will now be compiled into a graduation album for the students. Senyk also wanted to find an exhibition space to showcase them and sell the photos to donate any money raised to Ukrainian troops, Reuters reported.

Photographer Stanislav Senyk told Reuters he wanted to document the “very important story” of roughly 40 graduating seniors.
Instagram/@senykstas/Handout via REUTERS

One of the students, Olha Babynets, 17, said she enjoyed the photoshoot, even if it was “very difficult” for everyone involved.
Instagram/@senykstas/Handout via REUTERS

The photographs will now be compiled into a graduation album for the students. Senyk also wanted to find an exhibition space to showcase them.
@senykstas via REUTERS
One chilling photo showed a group of students huddled atop a tank, looking out with stoic faces with graduation sashes across their chests.
Instagram/@senykstas/Handout via REUTERS

Each class involved offered up different locations for the photoshoot, Senyk said.

“And that shows that Chernihiv is pretty much ruined throughout,” he told Reuters. “Not a single location was repeated, not once were we in the same place.”

What do you think? Be the first to comment.

Russia, meanwhile, was continuing its assault Monday on the Donbas region of Ukraine with ongoing artillery and air raids as it tries to take over the nation’s industrial heartland in a campaign that could change the course of the war.

With Post Wires
NY Philharmonic restores salaries to pre-pandemic levels

NEW YORK (AP) — The New York Philharmonic is restoring salaries of musicians to pre-pandemic levels as it prepares to return to Lincoln Center’s Geffen Hall for the 2022-23 season.

A four-year contract agreed to in December 2020 during a season canceled due to the coronavirus had called for players to earn 75% of minimum scale through Aug. 31, 2023, which comes to $2,214 weekly. The figure was to rise to 80% of scale through the first six months of the following fiscal year and 90% for the following six months.

The orchestra said Monday that salaries will be restored to a $2,952 weekly minimum starting Sept. 21.

After missing the 2020-21 season due to the pandemic, the orchestra split this season largely between Lincoln Center’s Alice Tully Hall (46 concerts) and Jazz at Lincoln Center’s Rose Theater (28 concerts). The Philharmonic held 89 concerts in all and drew 90% capacity with attendance of 74,787, not including its free Memorial Day performance at the Cathedral of St. John the Divine.

The Philharmonic returns to Geffen Hall on Oct. 7 after a $550 million renovation that reduced capacity to under 2,200 from 2,738 and cut rows in the orchestra cut from 43 to 33. The stage was moved forward 25 feet, allowing seven rows of wraparound seating behind the orchestra. About two-thirds of the third tier was eliminated.
MAKE THE SAUDI'S PAY

UN launches crowdfunding campaign to prevent Yemen tanker oil spill

Environmentalists say the Safer oil tanker is guaranteed to spill without intervention and could cost $20bn to clear up


A close-up view of the FSO Safer oil tanker off the port of Ras Isa, Yemen, on 19 June 2020
(Maxar Technologies via AFP)

By MEE staff
Published date: 13 June 2022

The United Nations has launched a crowd-funding campaign for an operation intended to prevent an ageing Yemeni oil tanker from unleashing a potentially catastrophic spill in the Red Sea, a senior official said Monday.

The UN has secured some $60m out of $80m needed to initially offload the Safer tanker which holds 1.1 million barrels of oil - four times as much oil that was spilt during the 1989 Exxon Valdez tanker disaster in the United States.

"We hope to raise $5m by the end of June," David Gressly, the UN's humanitarian coordinator for the war-hit country, told an online press briefing, adding it was an "ambitious" target.

"Today I launched a @UN crowdfunding campaign because we urgently need funds to start the emergency operation before it is too late," he said in a subsequent Twitter post.


The decaying 45-year-old oil tanker, FSO Safer, long used as a floating storage platform and now abandoned off the rebel-held Yemeni port of Hodeidah, has not been serviced since Yemen was plunged into civil war more than seven years ago.

It is in "imminent" danger of breaking up, the UN warned last month.

An operation to transfer its 1.1 million barrels of oil to a different vessel could begin next month, according to a website for the crowd-funding campaign, which will begin accepting donations Tuesday.

Environmentalists warn the cost of the salvage operation is a pittance compared to the estimated $20bn it would cost to clean up a spill.


Yemen: Decaying oil tanker in Red Sea threatens millions
Read More »

The UN has said an oil spill could destroy ecosystems, shut down the fishing industry and close the lifeline, Hodeida port, for six months.

It has said the operation needs to be completed by the end of September to avoid "turbulent winds" that pick up later in the year.

On Sunday, neighbouring Saudi Arabia said it would contribute $10m.

The Safer has been stranded off Ras Issa oil terminal without maintenance since 2015, when a Saudi-led coalition intervened in Yemen against the Houthi movement that ousted the internationally recognised government from the capital, Sanaa.

A truce between the rebels and the Saudi-led coalition has been in place since 2 April, coinciding with the start of the Muslim holy month of Ramadan.

Five days after it took effect, Yemen's Riyadh-based president, Abd-Rabbu Mansour Hadi, handed his powers to a Saudi-backed leadership council tasked with holding peace talks with the rebels.


US Government Watchdog Finds Flawed Weapons Monitoring in Yemen

Oversight Needed to Protect Yemeni Civilians, Hold Saudi Arabia and UAE Accountable


Akshaya Kumar
Director of Crisis Advocacy
@AkshayaSays

Click to expand Image
A delegation from Saudi Arabia examines models of military equipment at the Dubai Airshow 2021, in the UAE on November 14, 2021. © 2021 Andrea DiCenzo/Getty Images

A new internal report from the US Government Accountability Office (GAO) – the congressional watchdog – found serious gaps in US government oversight of how arms sold to Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) are being used. These findings show that Congress needs to get more involved in these weapons sales.

Human Rights Watch and others have warned for years that US-made weapons sold to Saudi Arabia and the UAE may be being used to commit war crimes in Yemen and that US officials could be implicated. We called for a suspension of these sales. Successive administrations argued they were tracking civilian casualties in Yemen and helping the coalition mitigate them through better targeting.

But the GAO report, obtained by Human Rights Watch, indicates that they’re likely not doing enough. Despite credible reports from the United Nations and civil society monitors detailing laws-of-war violations and likely war crimes, neither the State nor Defense Departments could, according to the report, “provide evidence” that they had “investigated any incidents of potential unauthorized use of equipment transferred to Saudi Arabia or UAE.”

That’s why congressional oversight remains essential. In fact, what we know from the GAO report comes largely because of Congress’ reporting requirements.

What more should Congress do?


First, press the GAO to publish the full report. US officials are reportedly trying to redact portions before it’s published, which could obscure important findings.

Second, urge the State Department to implement the report’s recommendations including the call for the Bureau of Political-Military Affairs to develop “specific guidance for investigating any indications that U.S.-origin defense articles have been used in Yemen by Saudi Arabia or UAE” in ways that violate international law.

Third, pass the Protection of Civilians in Military Operations Act, introduced in May. Among other things, the legislation would establish a hub within the Pentagon for supporting the US government on the issue of civilian harm.

The revelations in the GAO report come as President Joe Biden plans to travel to Saudi Arabia. On the campaign trail, Biden promised not to check US “values at the door to sell arms or buy oil.” In office, he has lobbied Congress to approve further arms sales to the kingdom.

Without being able to effectively monitor how US-made weapons are being used by the Saudis and their allies, or if US training and support is mitigating civilian harm, the US risks more than its values. It also risks complicity in the crimes themselves.

Forever chemicals linked to hypertension in middle-aged women

Hypertension Journal Report

Peer-Reviewed Publication

AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION

DALLAS, June 13, 2022 — Middle-aged women with higher blood concentrations of common synthetic chemicals called per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), also called “forever chemicals” and found in water, soil, air and food, were at greater risk of developing high blood pressure, compared to their peers who had lower levels of these substances, according to new research published today in Hypertension, an American Heart Association journal.

PFAS, are a class of synthetic chemicals and according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, there are thousands of different PFAS that are used in everyday household items, such as certain shampoo, dental floss, cosmetics, non-stick cookware, food packaging, stain-resistant coatings for carpeting, upholstery and clothing. The “forever chemicals” also enter the food system through fish caught in PFAS-contaminated water and dairy products from cows exposed to PFAS through fertilizers on farms, for example.

Even at low levels in the blood, research has shown PFAS can have detrimental health effects. Some PFAS have been linked to cardiovascular risk, including endothelial dysfunction (impaired blood vessel function), oxidative stress and elevated cholesterol. However, no previous studies have evaluated whether PFAS levels affect blood pressure control among middle-aged women.

Previously published data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) demonstrates how common PFAS exposure is, as nearly all Americans have detectable concentrations of at least one PFAS in their blood.

“PFAS are known as ‘forever chemicals’ because they never degrade in the environment and contaminate drinking water, soil, air, food and numerous products we consume or encounter routinely. One study estimated that two of the most common ’forever chemicals’ are found in most household drinking water and are consumed by more than two-thirds of Americans,” said study lead author Ning Ding, Ph.D., M.P.H., a post-doctoral fellow in the department of epidemiology at the University of Michigan School of Public Health in Ann Arbor, Michigan.

“Women seem to be particularly vulnerable when exposed to these chemicals,” she said. “Our study is the first to examine the association between ‘forever chemicals’ and hypertension in middle-aged women. Exposure may be an underappreciated risk factor for women’s cardiovascular disease risk.”

Using data from the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation-Multi-Pollutant Study (SWAN-MPS), a prospective study of women from diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds at midlife, researchers examined blood concentrations of specific PFAS and the risk of high blood pressure. Data included more than 1,000 women, 45-56-years old who had normal blood pressure when they enrolled in the study. Blood concentrations of PFAS were measured at the start of the study. All participants were followed almost-annually from 1999-2017. Participants were recruited from five institutional sites (Boston; Pittsburgh; Southeast Michigan; Los Angeles; and Oakland, California) across the U.S., and they self-identified as Black (15.2%), Chinese (14.1%), Japanese (16.2%) or white women (54.5%). All sites enrolled non-Hispanic white women in addition to one additional racial/ethnic group.

The analysis found:

  • During 11,722 person-years of follow-up for all study participants, 470 women developed high blood pressure.
  • Women with higher concentrations of specific PFAS were more likely to develop high blood pressure: women in the highest one-third concentrations of perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS), perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), and 2-(N-ethyl-perfluorooctane sulfonamido) acetic acid (EtFOSAA, a PFOS precursor) had 42%, 47% and 42% higher risks, respectively, of developing high blood pressure, compared to women in the lowest one-third concentrations of these PFAS.
  • Women in the highest one-third concentrations of all seven PFAS examined had a 71% increased risk of developing high blood pressure.

“It’s important to note that we examined individual PFAS as well as several PFAS together, and we found that the combined exposure to multiple PFAS had a stronger effect on blood pressure,” said study senior author Sung Kyun Park, Sc.D., M.P.H., an associate professor of epidemiology and environmental health sciences at the University of Michigan School of Public Health. “Some states are beginning to ban the use of PFAS in food packaging and cosmetic and personal care products. Our findings make it clear that strategies to limit the widespread use of PFAS in products need to be developed. Switching to alternative options may help reduce the incidence of high blood pressure risk in midlife women.”

“We have known for some time that PFAS disrupt metabolism in the body, yet, we didn’t expect the strength of the association we found. We hope that these findings alert clinicians about the importance of PFAS and that they need to understand and recognize PFAS as an important potential risk factor for blood pressure control,” Park said.

The study was limited in that it only included middle-aged women, so the findings may not translate to men or to younger or older women. The authors note that more research is needed to confirm these associations and to address ways to reduce PFAS exposure.

Co-authors are Carrie A. Karvonen-Gutierrez, Ph.D., M.P.H.; Bhramar Mukherjee, Ph.D.; Antonia M. Calafat, Ph.D.; and Siobán D. Harlow, Ph.D. Authors’ disclosures are listed in the manuscript.

The study was funded by the National Institutes of Health.

Studies published in the American Heart Association’s scientific journals are peer-reviewed. The statements and conclusions in each manuscript are solely those of the study authors and do not necessarily reflect the Association’s policy or position. The Association makes no representation or guarantee as to their accuracy or reliability. The Association receives funding primarily from individuals; foundations and corporations (including pharmaceutical, device manufacturers and other companies) also make donations and fund specific Association programs and events. The Association has strict policies to prevent these relationships from influencing the science content. Revenues from pharmaceutical and biotech companies, device manufacturers and health insurance providers and the Association’s overall financial information are available here.

Additional Resources:

About the American Heart Association

The American Heart Association is a relentless force for a world of longer, healthier lives. We are dedicated to ensuring equitable health in all communities. Through collaboration with numerous organizations, and powered by millions of volunteers, we fund innovative research, advocate for the public’s health and share lifesaving resources. The Dallas-based organization has been a leading source of health information for nearly a century. Connect with us on heart.orgFacebookTwitter or by calling 1-800-AHA-USA1.

###