Thursday, July 07, 2022

CHRISTIAN TERRORISM
Georgia Guidestones explosion: Officials release video, destroy remaining portion over 'safety concerns'

Georgia Guidestones hit with 'explosive device,' investigators say

By Greg Norman | Fox News

Georgia Guidestones monument explosion caught on video

The Georgia Bureau of Investigation has released surveillance footage showing Wednesday's Georgia Guidestones explosion and a car fleeing the scene.

The Georgia Bureau of Investigation has released surveillance video in the search for those responsible for setting off an explosion at the Georgia Guidestones monument, which they now say has been completely demolished over "safety concerns."

The 19-foot-high granite tourist attraction in Elberton — which the state says is known as "America's Stonehenge" — was damaged early Wednesday after "unknown individuals detonated an explosive device," according to the agency.

"For safety reasons, the structure has been completely demolished," the Georgia Bureau of Investigation later said while releasing the videos which show the blast and a silver car fleeing the scene.

Georgia’s tourism website says the monument "displays a 10-part message espousing the conservation of mankind and future generations in 12 languages."

GEORGIA GUIDESTONES TARGETED WITH ‘EXPLOSIVE DEVICE’, INVESTIGATORS SAY



The remaining standing portion of the Georgia Guidestones monument has been destroyed over "safety concerns," officials say.

"The Guidestones also serve as an astronomical calendar, and every day at noon the sun shines through a narrow hole in the structure and illuminates the day’s date on an engraving," it added.

The attraction gained renewed attention in May when Kandiss Taylor, a Republican candidate for governor, claimed the stones were satanic and included destroying them as part of her platform, according to the Associated Press.
 



Law enforcement officials walk around the damaged Georgia Guidestones monument near Elberton, Ga., on Wednesday, July 6. (Rose Scoggins/The Elberton Star via AP)

"God is God all by Himself. He can do ANYTHING He wants to do. That includes striking down Satanic Guidestones," Taylor tweeted Wednesday.



Police tape blocks off the damaged Georgia Guidestones monument near Elberton, Ga., on Wednesday, July 6. (Rose Scoggins/The Elberton Star via AP)

As of Thursday, the motive behind the explosion – and who is responsible for the damage – was not immediately clear.


https://plawiuk.blogspot.com/2022/07/republican-celebrates-after-explosion.html
Ons Jabeur reacts to making tennis history at Wimbledon

JULY 8, 2022 
by DZEVAD MESIC 



World No. 2 Ons Jabeur reached her maiden Grand Slam final at Wimbledon and made tennis history in the process. On Thursday, Jabeur overcame 103rd-ranked Tatjana Maria 6-2 3-6 6-1 to become the first Arab or African woman to reach a Grand Slam final.


"The dream kind of started last year when I enjoyed playing here, enjoyed the crowd. I didn't play so many Wimbledons before. Usually it was the first and second round. It's tricky to play on grass. I knew I was playing good on grass because of my game and everything.

But last year, Melanie [Maillard] reminded me, my mental coach, I told her, 'I'm coming back next year for the title,' when I lost in the quarterfinals. I just love everything around here, the atmosphere and everything.

It was my main goal from the beginning of the season, and even from last year. Everything about the energy, I just love being here."

Jabeur overcame Maria to book an Elena Rybakina final

Jabeur got off to a very fast start, breaking Maria twice to easily win the first set.

Maria maybe didn't make a good start to her first Grand Slam semifinal but her level improved in the second set as she earned her first in the fourth game and then held on to her serve the rest of the set to force a decider.

However, losing the second set didn't impact Jabeur, who started the third set with a 5-0 lead before serving out for the match in the seventh game. In the Wimbledon final, Jabeur faces 23rd-ranked Rybakina, who upset Simona Halep in the semifinal.

Jabeur and Rybakina will be going head-to-head for the fourth time when they meet in the Wimbledon final. Jabeur has a positive 2-1 head-to-head record versus Rybakina - Rybakina won their first meeting in 2019, before Jabeur won their second and third meetings last year.

Tunisia’s Ons Jabeur makes more history for Arab women at Wimbledon


In the semi-finals, Jabeur will face another newcomer to this stage at a major tournament, Tatjana Maria.



Wednesday 06/07/2022
The Arab Weekly

Ons Jabeur celebrates after winning a point against Marie Bouzkova in a women’s singles quarter-final match on day nine of the Wimbledon tennis championships in London, July 5, 2022. (AP)


WIMBLEDON, England –

To the many “firsts” filling Ons Jabeur’s résumé, add a new one: the first Arab woman to reach the semi-finals at a Grand Slam tournament.

The third-seeded Tunisian improved on last year’s quarter-final run at Wimbledon by going one better on Tuesday at the grass-court Grand Slam tournament. She beat Marie Bouzkova 3-6, 6-1, 6-1 on Centre Court.

“It means a lot,” said the 27-year-old Jabeur, who is ranked No. 2 in the world.

“I was hoping that I could get to this stage for a long time already … I was talking a little bit to (former Moroccan player) Hicham Arazi and he told me, ‘Arabs always lose in the quarter-finals and we are sick of it. Please break this.’ I was, like, I’ll try, my friend.”

She tried and it is true, she did it.

In the semi-finals, Jabeur will face another newcomer to this stage at a major tournament,Tatjana Maria.

The 34-year-old German, who twice took breaks from tennis to have a child, became the oldest first-time Grand Slam semi-finalist in the Open era in her 35th appearance at such a tournament. She defeated 22-year-old Jule Niemeier 4-6, 6-2, 7-5 on No. 1 Court.

Jabeur and Maria are good friends.

“I’m really happy for her that she’s getting what she deserves. I know she struggled a lot,” Jabeur said. “It’s not easy coming back after having two babies. It’s going to be a great match between us, a lot of respect, for sure.”

Jabeur has been setting record after record for Arab players in recent years. She became the first Arab woman to reach the quarter-finals at a Grand Slam tournament in 2020 at the Australian Open.

In 2021, she was the first Arab player to break into the top ten of the men’s or women’s rankings, then became the first Arab to win a WTA title and topped it off with her record run to the Wimbledon quarter-finals.

This year, things have been going even better for Jabeur on the grass at the All England Club. She won her first four matches in straight sets and was rarely troubled in any of them.

That changed against Bouzkova, a 23-year-Czech who had never before been to the third round at a major tournament. Bouzkova’s strong start, however, did not last into the second set.

“She gets all the balls and doesn’t make, to win a point, easy for me,” Jabeur said. “I’m glad I stepped in with my game. I was more aggressive in the second set, and especially tactically I was playing some angles that she didn’t like much.”

Maria also lost the first set before recovering to win the next two. The victory made her only the sixth woman to reach the Wimbledon semi-finals after turning 34 years old.

The previous five women, Billie Jean King, Martina Navratilova, Chris Evert, Venus Williams and Serena Williams, won a combined 30 titles at the All England Club in their careers.

“To be in a list of such great players, it’s amazing,” said Maria, who had only ever reached the third round at a major once before, at Wimbledon in 2015. “I mean, to have my name in the same spot, yeah, I still cannot believe it, really.”

Maria is making her tenth appearance at the All England Club, her participation was twice interrupted to have children. Her first daughter was born in 2013 and the second came in 2021.

Tennis, despite this incredible run at Wimbledon, has taken a back seat to family ever since the kids came along.

“I think for me, that’s the most important in my life, to be a mom of my two kids. Nothing will change this,” Maria said.

“I’m in the semi-final of Wimbledon, it’s crazy, but I’m still a mom. After this I will go out over there and I will see my kids and I will do the same thing what I do every single day.”

Maria was ranked outside the top 250 as recently as March, but she has worked her way back to No. 103.

She returned from her second maternity leave about a year ago and lost in the first round of the US Open. At the majors this year, she lost in the first round at both the Australian Open and the French Open.

“I always believed that I have something inside, I mean, that I can do this,” Maria said. “I always believed in this, but to be now here in this spot … one year ago I gave birth to my second daughter. If somebody would tell me one year later you are in a semi-final of Wimbledon, that’s crazy.”

CRIMINAL CAPITALI$M IS THERE ANY OTHER KIND
Theranos COO Ramesh Balwani found guilty of multimillion-dollar fraud in US

Federal jury in San Jose on Thursday found the Pakistan-born guilty of two counts of conspiracy and ten counts of wire fraud



Theranos's Chief Operating Officer Ramesh 'Sunny' Balwani

Our Bureau, PTI | New York | Published 08.07.22, 10:54 AM

Blood testing company Theranos's Chief Operating Officer Ramesh 'Sunny' Balwani has been found guilty by a federal jury in the US on all counts he was charged with related to a multimillion-dollar fraud scheme at the company founded by his former girlfriend Elizabeth Holmes, once touted as Silicon Valley's rising star.

The federal jury in San Jose on Thursday found Pakistan-born Balwani, 57, guilty of two counts of conspiracy and ten counts of wire fraud through a multimillion-dollar scheme to defraud investors and patients in connection with the operations of Theranos, United States Attorney Stephanie Hinds and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Special Agent in Charge Sean Ragan said in a statement.

The jury reached the verdict on Thursday after a trial that began in March this year before United States District Judge Edward J Davila and concluded just over 6 months after a jury found Holmes guilty of one count of conspiracy and three counts of wire fraud in related proceedings.

Six months after the guilty verdicts in the Elizabeth Holmes trial, this jury has concluded that Holmes's business partner, Ramesh Balwani, also bears responsibility for defrauding investors in Theranos. The jury concluded that Balwani also perpetrated fraud on unsuspecting patients, Hinds said.

Balwani remains free on bond pending further hearings. Judge Davila scheduled Balwani's sentencing hearing for November 15, 2022 when he faces a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison, and a fine of USD 250,000, plus restitution, for each count of conspiracy and each count of wire fraud.

He was employed from September 2009 to July 2016 at the Palo Alto-based blood-testing company founded by Holmes, 38, in 2003.

While employed with Theranos, Balwani worked for the company in several capacities, including as a member of the company's board of directors, as its president, and as its chief operating officer.

At trial, the government submitted evidence that while at Theranos, Balwani conspired to commit wire fraud against investors between 2010 and 2015, conspired to commit wire fraud between 2013 and 2016 against patients who paid for Theranos' blood testing services, and that he committed wire fraud against investors and patients.

The statement said that on conspiracy charges, the government submitted evidence regarding Balwani's claims that Theranos developed a revolutionary and proprietary analyser that the defendants referred to by various names, including the TSPU, Edison, or minilab.

Balwani and Holmes claimed the analyser was able to perform a full range of clinical tests using small blood samples drawn from a finger stick. They also represented that the analyser could produce results that were more accurate and reliable than those yielded by conventional methods all at a faster speed than previously possible.

At trial, the government demonstrated that Holmes and Balwani knew that many of their representations about the analyser were false, but nevertheless conspired to convince potential investors and patients that the claims were true.

Holmes, Balwani and others knew that the analyser had accuracy and reliability problems, performed a limited number of tests, was slower than some competing devices, and, in some respects, could not compete with existing, more conventional machines.

Similarly, on substantive fraud charges, the evidence demonstrated Balwani used advertisements and solicitations to encourage and induce patients to use Theranos's blood testing laboratory services, even though he knew Theranos was not capable of consistently producing accurate and reliable results for certain blood tests.

The statement added that evidence showed that Balwani represented to investors that Theranos would generate over USD 100 million in revenues and break even in 2014 and that Theranos expected to generate approximately USD 1 billion in revenues in 2015.

However, in truth, Theranos resorted to using conventional machines bought from third parties to perform much of Theranos's blood testing and Balwani knew the company would generate only negligible or modest revenues in 2014 and 2015.

The trial evidence included numerous misrepresentations made by Balwani to potential investors about Theranos's financial condition and its future prospects.

The evidence showed that Balwani represented to investors that Theranos would dramatically increase the number of Wellness Centers within Walgreens stores even though Theranos's retail Walgreens rollout had stalled because of several issues.

In July 2020, a federal grand jury returned a superseding indictment charging Balwani with two counts of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and ten counts of wire fraud.

Like Holmes, Balwani was charged with conspiring to commit wire fraud against investors in Theranos during the period 2010 to 2015, conspiring to commit wire fraud against patients who paid for Theranos' blood testing services during the period 2013 to 2016, and ten counts of wire fraud.

Six of the wire fraud counts involved fraud against investors in Theranos while the remaining four involved wire fraud against patients who paid for Theranos' blood testing services and advertising purchased by Theranos to attract those patients. At Thursday's verdicts, Balwani was found guilty on all counts.

In a separate trial, a separate jury convicted Holmes on January 3, 2022, of the investor-related conspiracy count and three counts of wire fraud.

That jury acquitted Holmes of the patient-related conspiracy wire fraud count and three additional wire fraud counts; in addition, one count of wire fraud relating to a Theranos patient was dismissed during Holmes's trial.

The jury could not reach a unanimous verdict in her trial with respect to three investor fraud-related counts. Judge Davila scheduled Holmes's sentencing for September 26, 2022.

Ragan said the jury has determined that the fraud at Theranos reached the level of a "criminal conspiracy".

The FBI has spent years investigating this investment fraud scheme Lies, deceit, and criminal actions cannot replace innovation and success, FBI Special Agent in Charge Ragan said.

United States | Zygote rights

A push to recognise the rights of the unborn is growing in America

The movement risks inflicting grievous harm on pregnant women


Jul 7th 2022 | WASHINGTON, DC
THE ECONOMIST

What happens when America’s extreme anti-abortion activism meets its litigiousness? Fetuses get their own lawyers. In recent years some judges in conservative states have appointed legal representation for fetuses in abortion disputes (generally, when a minor wants to terminate a pregnancy). The arrangement has some glaring holes. Lawyers cannot meet or talk to their client or, supposing a fetus had wishes, guess at them. Yet with the recent overturning of Roe v Wade—the ruling that had enshrined access to abortion as a constitutional right—the push for legal recognition of the “personhood” of fetuses is set to grow.

Many anti-abortionists believe that life begins at conception. Proponents of “fetal personhood” go a step further, arguing that the 14th Amendment of America’s constitution gives “equal protection of the laws” to all, including a fertilised egg (despite the fact that as many as half of all zygotes do not implant and become pregnancies). Increasingly, anti-abortion legislation is adopting the language of fetal personhood.

THE REST IS BEHIND PAYWALL I THOUGHT THIS WAS ENOUGH TO GET THE POINT ACROSS 



The science and politics behind abortion

Following the justices’ decision, starting from  sixth week of pregnancy and in some cases even from the moment of conception, abortions became illegal in at least nine US states.

By NOAM LEVIATAN/DAVIDSON INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE
 JERUSALEM POST
Published: JULY 7, 2022 

United States Supreme Court overturns the landmark Roe v Wade abortion decision
(photo credit: REUTERS/Michael A. McCoy)

US Supreme Court overturned the landmark Roe v. Wade ruling on June 24, reversing the 1973 ruling that a woman’s choice to undergo an induced abortion is a constitutional right.

Following the justices’ decision, starting from the sixth week of pregnancy and in some cases even from the moment of conception, abortions became illegal in at least nine US states. The immediate consequence of this dramatic ruling is the forced cancellation of planned and scheduled abortions.

In the coming weeks, additional US states are expected to limit the rights of women* to terminate a pregnancy.

The 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling stated that a ban on abortions is unconstitutional, infringing on a pregnant woman’s right to privacy as well as on her right to choose for herself whether or not to undergo an abortion. Nearly immediately from the moment of the ruling, conservative activists started working on finding a way to overturn it.

Already in 1985, Samuel Alito, a Catholic conservative, and today a Supreme Court Justice, suggested a strategy for the slow erosion of Roe v. Wade, up to the point of reversal of the ruling. This week, with the help of the three conservative justices appointed by former US President Donald Trump, they succeeded.



Some states already had pre-existing so-called 'trigger laws', aimed at banning abortions, which were not valid due to the Roe v. Wade ruling. However, the overturning of the ruling activated these immediately. Some of these laws, such as the ones present in Alabama and Missouri, ban pregnancy termination from the moment of conception.

Others – such as in the case of Ohio, Georgia and South Carolina – allow women the choice of abortion as long as 'heartbeats' are not detectable in the fetus. This implies that, with the excepton of cases of incest or rape, these laws prohibit abortion from about the sixth week of pregnancy (counted as the sixth week from the first day of the last menstrual cycle).

At first glance, these laws seem less limiting than those in Alabama and Missouri, but since most women are not even aware of being pregnant during the sixth week, the 'heartbeat law' represents a de facto ban on abortions.


Finger On The Pulse

The legislators of the 'heartbeat law', and even those of the draconian laws enacted in Alabama, Missouri and in other states, claim that these laws are based on the most advanced medical science and on the forefront of human rights.

They claim that science has determined that 'unborn children'' are human beings in every aspect, and that these laws only protect their rights. In addition to these pseudo-scientific claims, the laws include different attempts to appeal to emotions.

From the use of the words 'children' and 'heartbeats' to allude to a living human heart, to (in the case of Alabama) comparison of these laws to the US Constitutional Amendments that abolished slavery and granted women the right to vote, as well as to the comparison of abortions to mass murders such as the ones that took place during the Holocaust or in the Soviet Gulags.

What do the fetus and its heart really look like during the sixth week of pregnancy? The age of the fetus is calculated from the moment of conception (or more precisely from the day of ovulation), which occurs about two weeks after the first day of the last menstrual cycle, and therefore at this stage the fetus would only be four weeks old.

At this stage, the fetus looks like a tiny tadpole, attached to a yolk sac, about 4 millimeters in size. It does not yet have a brain, it does not resemble a human being, and it lacks the vital systems and organs that could allow it to be defined as a 'child', but a pulse can indeed sometimes be detected, even though it does not yet originate from a real heart at this developmental stage.

When the fetus is three weeks old, during the fifth week of pregnancy, the organ that will eventually become the fetal heart resembles an enlarged vessel, a cluster of cells that contract, enabling the flow of liquid through the fetus.

During the sixth week of pregnancy, this vessel folds and begins to divide into compartments and sometimes the contractions can be detected by an ultrasound scan.

The heart continues to develop quickly and by the ninth week of pregnancy, it is already divided into four compartments and beats well.

Detection of a normal pulse is a sign of a normal pregnancy and is associated with a decrease in the risk of miscarriage. However, natural miscarriages during the first weeks of pregnancy are not uncommon and by the seventh to eighth week it is not always possible to distinguish between a natural miscarriage and heavy menstrual bleeding.

At this developmental stage a fetus has no independent existence outside of the uterus, and if aborted, either naturally or by induction, it does not continue to develop.

Fetuses born during the 20th week of pregnancy or beforehand have no chance of survival. Survival rates remain close to zero between weeks 21 to 23.

At 24 weeks of pregnancy, the survival rates of a prematurely born fetus are between 40-70 percent, especially if the preterm fetus weighs 500 grams or more and if the prenatal and neonatal intensive care unit is well-equipped and has skilled staff.

The stage of pregnancy from week 24 onwards is termed the age of fetal viability, since a premature fetus born during this stage has a reasonable chance of survival.


In 1992, in the ruling of Planned Parenthood v. Casey, the US Supreme Court reaffirmed Roe v. Wade and was even more lenient, ruling in favor of the right of abortion until the stage of fetal viability.

States could impose a ban on abortions after the age of fetal viability, in order to protect the fetus’s potential life, as long as the mother’s life and health were not in danger.

For this reason, laws aimed at banning abortion before the stage of fetal viability, such as during the sixth week of pregnancy, were eventually dismissed in the courts.

Quite a few states found other ways of making it as difficult as possible for women to get an abortion, without officially banning it – such as using different means of shutting down clinics in which pregnancy terminations were carried out.

Now, this ruling has been overturned as well, along with Roe v. Wade, and states are free to ban abortions at any stage.

The wording of these abortion banning laws and the publications related to them, mention heartbeats and other signs of life in an attempt to make people consider the tiny tadpole, which lacks an independent existence, as a whole living being, and possibly to cause confusion between the stage of the presence of a heartbeat and the moment at which the fetus reaches the age of viability.

Suffering is An Ineradicable Part of Life

Part of the appeal to emotions in the anti-abortion laws sometimes includes claims that the ban on abortions is designed to prevent pain inflicted on the fetus. In light of this claim, states such as Nebraska, ban abortions from the 22 week of pregnancy, at least for the time being.


In North Carolina, the same argument was used in an attempt to ban abortions from week 20 of pregnancy, but abortions are now banned there only from the age of viability.

The pain argument is mentioned even in laws banning abortions from the sixth week of pregnancy, although it is not used to justify the ban. According to legislators, science has determined that by week 20 of pregnancy a fetus can sense pain, despite the fact that the scientific consensus is that it cannot feel pain before week 26.


In order to feel pain, a fetus has to undergo a few developmental stages: pain requires the presence of pain receptors, a neural connection between these sensory receptors to the spinal cord and brain, and appropriate structures in the brain able to identify pain and generate a pain sensation.

According to an extensive review by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG), pain receptors begin to appear on the skin only from the tenth week of pregnancy, and in the internal organs only starting from the 13th week of pregnancy.

These continue to develop and mature during the next six to eight weeks. However, at this stage, they are unable to communicate the received signals to the brain. Only from the 18th week of pregnancy do the pain receptors connect to the spinal cord.

At this stage, the fetus already reacts to touch – if its hand is accidentally pricked, or even touched, for example during amniocentesis, a withdrawal reflex will be activated and the hand will be quickly pulled back away from the needle.

This movement is involuntary since it is mediated by the spinal cord and does not involve the brain, similarly to the knee-jerk reflex that generates a sudden kicking movement of the lower leg in response to a sharp tap of the patellar tendon, found beneath the kneecap.

The withdrawal reflex is not necessarily pain-related and it also occurs in babies following a light touch, implying that its existence does not indicate the existence of a pain sensation. For the occurrence of a pain sensation, the appropriate “equipment” is required to be present in the brain.

The required brain structures are the cortex, located on the surface of the cerebrum, and three main regions within it: the insula, a region of the cerebral cortex related to emotions and sensation; the primary somatosensory cortex, responsible for the processing of somatic sensations such as touch and pain, and more; and the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), responsible for the processing of stimuli.

In addition, these regions require the presence of working and functional neural connections to other parts of the brain. These connections begin to appear and function starting from the 24th week of pregnancy and continue to develop in the weeks that follow.

It is not at all certain that a fetus can sense pain before these connections complete their development (around week 29), but there is certainly no reason to think it can sense pain before week 24, when the minimal systems required for pain sensation have not yet developed in the brain

Grief and Regret?

While most abortion banning laws do not mention this, many anti-abortion proponents claim that an induced abortion also poses a threat to the mother’s mental health.

They claim that most women will regret having undergone an abortion and that they are at an increased risk of developing depression. However, this claim is not supported by evidence.

One study that followed the rate of regret among about 670 women who chose to undergo an abortion, across thirty abortion clinics in the US, found that 95 percent of women did not regret their decision even three years later, despite the fact that 53 percent of the women defined the decision to abort as a difficult one.


In addition, the intensity of women’s emotions concerning the abortion subsided over time. According to the study, the stigma and the negative campaigns are driven by various anti-abortion organizations that caused stress to women who were undecided on whether or not to undergo an abortion.

However, eventually, the vast majority of women do not regret having undergone an abortion and are at peace with their decision.

In a previous study by the same research group, which included 960 women, including the aforementioned 670 women, the researchers followed women for five years following their abortion, as well as women who sought an abortion but were denied the request and were forced to carry the baby to term.

Women who were denied an abortion reported more symptoms of anxiety and lower self-esteem one week after seeking treatment at a clinic, compared to the other women.

However, over time these feelings improved and after a few years, no differences in the psychological well-being were found between the women who have given birth and those who had undergone an abortion.

In addition, no differences in the level of depression were found between the two groups and no evidence indicated that undergoing an abortion or not undergoing an abortion was mentally detrimental for the women.

In contrast, additional studies carried out by this research group found that women who were denied an abortion were at a greater risk of living in poverty, with no money for basic commodities such as food or fuel.

Their credit rating was lower and they were at a greater risk of being unemployed, bankrupt, or evicted from their home. This, despite the fact that both groups – women who terminated their pregnancies and women who were forced to carry them to term – started from a more or less similar socioeconomic situation.

In addition, the risk of childbirth is generally much greater than the risk of terminating a pregnancy. Indeed, two out of the women who participated in the study and were denied an abortion died during childbirth, while none died as a result of a legal abortion.

A similar study carried out in Finland by a different research group has reached similar conclusions. In the study, the researchers analyzed data from over one thousand women under the age of 18 who became pregnant and either had an abortion or have given birth, and found no difference in the mental health of the women in the long term.

In contrast, the study found that women who had undergone an abortion were more likely to have a higher level of education and to be better off financially by the age of 25, compared to those who have given birth. The results of this study do not necessarily indicate that an abortion improves women’s education and salary, but it is possible that the chances of these women improved due to the fact that they did not need to support a child.

An abortion is an unpleasant experience and usually not an easy decision to undertake, but women who choose to terminate their pregnancies are not at an increased risk of suffering from grief, regret or mental problems. Campaigns and claims by anti-abortion proponents make the decision to abort even more difficult and stressful than it already is in the first place.

The argument that a fetus already has a heart by week six of pregnancy is more or less true, and by week nine it is correct, but this is not related to the ability of the fetus to exist independently, which is determined by the age of fetal viability.

In addition, according to the scientific evidence, a fetus is unable to sense pain before the 24th week of pregnancy, while all abortions are in fact carried out long before this, with the exception of pregnancy terminations that are carried out for medical reasons - due to life-threatening conditions for the mother or medical problems in the fetus.

* The words ‘woman’ or ‘women’ also refer to any person who may become pregnant.

This article is based on a publication that first appeared in the blog “Noam’s Ark – Biological Thoughts”. The publication is courtesy of Noam Levitan and all rights are reserved to him.


Countries must face the International Court of Justice over Yazidi genocide


Dr Leyla Ferman and Aarif Abraham

The images of the Yazidis trapped on Mount Sinjar in Aug 2014, surrounded by fighters of the so-called Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), facing death by thirst in the searing desert heat or through capture, remains indelibly imprinted in all our minds.

So do the harrowing accounts of Yazidi women being subject to repeated sexual violence, girls as young as eight being forced into sexual servitude and sold as chattels, and young Yazidi boys captured and indoctrinated to kill their kith and kin.

The Yazidis are one of humanities’ oldest communities and their religion is the oldest surviving monotheistic tradition. As these horrific events unfolded, in lands remote and distant from Britain, many of us took it for granted that, firstly, such a community – a pre-cursor to Judaism, Christianity and Islam – could still exist. Secondly, that this apparent “genocide” had a long and slow genesis rooted in state failures from the corridors of power in Westminster to the deserts of Iraq.

And those were the allegations from which the Yazidi Justice Committee (YJC), an ad hoc group of five leading human rights NGOs, began their investigations two years ago into 13 states allegedly responsible for what happened to the Yazidis at the hands of ISIS. What did they find and why ought the British government be concerned

A precedent must be set to signal the real-world consequences of committing genocide

The YJC found that genocide is exactly what happened to the Yazidis: killings, serious bodily mental harm, conditions of life calculated destroy, measures intended to restrict births, and transfer of children from the Yazidi group to ISIS. All with the intent by the ISIS perpetrators to destroy the Yazidis. They confirmed not only that genocide occurred, as contemporaneously assessed by the United Nations from 2014 onwards, but that it remains ongoing today with continuing inaction from Iraq or Syria to protect the fraction of those who returned to their homeland (50-100k out of 600k in Iraq and less than a 1000 out of 20,000 approximately in Syria) and repeated attacks on Yazidis by Turkish armed forces or affiliated militia.

As critical is the YJC’s findings that Iraq, Syria and Turkey failed to prevent the genocide, failed to prosecute individual perpetrators of genocide (not a single prosecution for genocide has been brought) and failed to give proper effect in their domestic law to the provisions of the Genocide Convention. In respect of one state, Turkey – a Nato member – they found that state officials were complicit with ISIS perpetrators through, inter alia; allowing the free flow of fighters across the border, weapons transfers, training support, trade in Yazidi women and girls and materiel support to ISIS.

States are required, under the Genocide Convention, to deploy “all means reasonably available” to prevent genocide the instant they know of the “serious risk” of genocide. The YJC Yazidis were at serious risk from at least April 2013 – more than a year before the harrowing events on Sinjar Mountain. Yet these states did precisely nothing.

The consequence of a failure to honour duties to protect, prevent and punish, means that a third state, such as Britain or another ratifying State to the Convention, could bring failing states before the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and hold them accountable.

The UK government has long held, erroneously, that it cannot make a determination of genocide until a competent international court has ruled on the matter. For this reason, it has never recognised the Yazidi genocide. It is now open to the UK government, with others, to seize the initiative and take one or more of these states before the ICJ. There are, of course, realpolitik considerations of taking Turkey (a not so reliable NATO ally) or Iraq (an avowed partner) to the ICJ – but Syria, where the genesis of ISIS began and a State which helped create the conditions for the ongoing Yazidi genocide (with cover from Russia from 2015), is an obvious starting point for action.

The UK has a historical connection to this region and a real interest in the international rules-based order in world where might is increasingly solely right. An ICJ case would finally recognise genocide of the Yazidis recognised and hold responsible states accountable – only a single successful prosecution for genocide of a low-level individual has occurred in Germany Frankfurt last year. Thousands of ISIS fighters languish in prisons in Iraq, Syria and Turkey. An ICJ case would also, critically, assist survivors of the genocide by requiring a state to ensure remedial actions, reparations, commitments for non-repetition, prosecution of alleged perpetrators, actions for damages, and provisional measures asking for cessation of all continuing harm. A future precedent can and must be set to signal the real-world consequences of committing genocide.

Governments around the world should not only call what is happening to the Yazidis by its proper name: genocide. That is long overdue. But governments also ought to start to meaningfully engage and give effect to their international legal obligations - using all international diplomatic, economic, and political means and all international fora to consider state responsibility seriously - for that is possibly the sole and certainly the most salient route to ending the scourge of genocide. For the Yazidis it would mean the world and for the world it is a litmus test of our humanity.

Dr Leyla Ferman is the Director of Women for Justice and co-founder of Yazidi Justice Committee. Aarif Abraham is a barrister specialising in public international law and international criminal law.

NOTE THE VARIETY OF SPELLINGS




Exclusive-United Arab Emirates set to run Kabul airport in deal with Taliban, sources say

By Alexander Cornwell - 

Taliban members stand on airport runway in Kabul

DUBAI (Reuters) -The Taliban and the United Arab Emirates are poised to strike a deal for the Gulf nation to run Kabul airport and several others in Afghanistan that could be announced within weeks, according to sources familiar with the negotiations.

The Taliban, whose government remains an international pariah without formal recognition, have courted regional powers, including Qatar and Turkey, to operate Kabul airport, landlocked Afghanistan's main air link with the world, and others.

But after months of back-and-forth talks, and at one point raising the possibility of a joint UAE-Turkey-Qatar deal, the Taliban is set to hand the operations in their entirety to the UAE, who had previously run Afghan airports, the sources said.

An agreement would help the Islamist militants ease their isolation from the outside world as they govern an impoverished country beset by drought, widespread hunger and economic crisis. It would also hand Abu Dhabi a win in its diplomatic tussle with Qatar for influence.

Under the deal with the UAE, Afghans will be employed at the airports, including in security roles, crucial for the Taliban who want to show they can create jobs but also because they staunchly oppose the presence of foreign forces, sources said.

An Emirati state-linked contractor had been contracted to provide security services, which should be announced soon, while negotiations over airspace management are ongoing, they said.

The militants in May awarded the ground services contract to UAE state-linked GAAC, which was involved in running security and ground handling services at Afghan airports before the Taliban takeover, shortly after Taliban officials had visited Abu Dhabi.

SECURITY CONTRACT

Meanwhile, Qatar and Turkey's joint negotiations with the Taliban broke down around the same time, sources said.

Emirati officials had no immediate comment when contacted by Reuters. GAAC did not respond to a request for comment.

Arms trade or not, DSCA wants on-the-ground supervision in Ukraine

WASHINGTON — DSCA, the agency in charge of foreign US arms sales, currently has no on-the-ground access to US-donated weapons to Ukraine and whether they are being used as intended. This was stated by Jed Royal, deputy director of the Defense Security Cooperation Agency [DSCA] to journalists during a round table meeting last Thursday [June 30].

Washington wants an extension of the arms embargo against Iran
Photo credit: VOA

Due to the war in Ukraine, no toolkit works as it did in peacetime, i.e. going to a foreign country, opening military warehouses, tracking serial numbers, the state of weaponry, its availability, etc. Royal confirmed the view that currently in this situation, DSCA officials are “somewhat limited” in their ability to carry out more robust monitoring of weapons supplied to Ukraine.

BulgarianMilitary.com recalls that in recent weeks there have been allegations of illegal arms trade during wartime. As we wrote, sources claim that Ukraine sold Russia two self-propelled French Caesar howitzers. Ukraine [France too] rejects this claim. Last month, a Javelin anti-tank guided missile system appeared for sale on the darknet, with the place of purchase being Kyiv, the capital of Ukraine.

Jed Royal told reporters that officials will have to be more creative in carrying out their duties, but only if the agency sends more people into the field to conduct inspections. “Once we have more people in the country, we should be in a position to actually go do more physical validation [and] verification, going forward,” he said. “That’s the kind of thing that we’re looking for here. It still won’t be like a peacetime environment for it. So we’re going to have to get creative in how we do this.”

It has not yet been decided how and when DSCA officials will begin inspections of weapons delivered to Ukraine. Royal is hoping to get a cooperation office in Ukraine to house examiners, a practice worldwide carried out by the agency. However, Royal does not want to send a “task force”.

Ukraine received M30/M31 rockets with 51lb of PBX-109 high explosives
Photo credit: Think Defence

Jed Royal said that at the moment the only verification being done was on credibility – assurances from the Ukrainians that were given to DSCA agents and described them as “very solid and satisfactory”.

Congress wants the same

BulgarianMilitary.com recalls that currently, Ukraine has received US$6 billion worth of military equipment as military aid. US President Joe Biden almost once a month announces a new package of weapon systems, ammunition, and consumables that the US is ready to give to Ukraine, thereby increasing the revenge against Ukraine.

While Congress has been broadly supportive of security assistance to Ukraine, lawmakers across the political spectrum — including Sens. Rand Paul, R-Ky., and Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass. — have raised concerns about the department’s seeming lack of oversight.

***

BulgarianMilitary.com 

Our standards: Manifesto & ethical princliples.

Russian UN veto could threaten aid deliveries to 3m people in Syria - BBC News


Russia has threatened to veto a UN Security Council resolution reauthorizing cross-border deliveries of vital aid into north-western Syria.

The closure of the last route from Turkey would immediately put more than 3 million people at risk of starvation.

Russia occupies 22 percent of Ukraine farmland: NASA


AFP
Published: 07 July ,2022

Russian forces now occupy about 22 percent of Ukraine’s farmland since the February 24 invasion, impacting one of the major suppliers to global grain and edible oils markets, NASA said Thursday.

Satellite data analyzed by scientists at the US space agency shows that Russia’s occupation of eastern and southern Ukraine gives it control of land that produces 28 percent of the country’s winter crops, mainly wheat, canola, barley, and rye, and 18 percent of summer crops, mostly maize and sunflower.

The war’s disruption of harvesting and planting – including farmers fleeing the war, the lack of labor and fields pockmarked by shelling – could have a heavy impact on global food supplies, NASA scientists said.

“The world’s breadbasket is at war,” said Inbal Becker-Reshef, director of NASA’s Harvest program, which uses US and European satellite data to study global food production.

According to US data, before the war Ukraine supplied 46 percent of the sunflower oil traded on global markets, nine percent of the wheat, 17 percent of the barley, and 12 percent of maize.

Russia’s invasion has blocked exports of food from Odessa, the main port on the Black Sea, and destroyed storage and transport infrastructure in some areas.

That means farmers in the entire country, but especially in occupied areas, have less options for getting their output into storage and to markets.

And it also threatens the planting of winter crops in the fall.

“We’re in the beginning stages of a rolling food crisis that will likely affect every country and person on Earth in some way,” said Becker-Reshef.

Donbas: What’s Ukraine Losing—Industrial Hub, Breadbasket or Both?

July 07, 2022

With Russian forces coming closer to establishing control over the entire Donbas, one can’t help but wonder what Kyiv might lose for good if Russia captures the remainder of this historical region, which consists of Ukraine’s Donetsk and Luhansk provinces, and holds onto it, per Putin’s plan. Searches for “Donbas”1 turn up descriptions of an “industrial heartland” and a “breadbasket” (though the latter term crops up far less often). Is the Donbas either? And what would Russia gain from controlling it?

The short answer to the first question, based on data from the State Statistics Service of Ukraine, is that prior to the conflict there the Donbas could indeed have been described as an industrial heartland, but not exactly a breadbasket. In 2013—the last full year before Russia’s de-facto separation of parts of these two regions from Ukraine—Donetsk and Luhansk:

  • Jointly accounted for a quarter of Ukraine’s industrial production; 
  • Had the 2nd- and 9th-highest gross regional product, respectively, among Ukraine’s 27 constituent territories.
  • When it comes to agriculture, however, only the Donetsk region made it into the top 10 of Ukrainian regions with the greatest agricultural production.

The longer answer to the first question is below.

Industrial production: In 2013 the Donetsk and Luhansk regions ranked No. 1 and 5, respectively, among Ukrainian constituent territories in terms of the value of their industrial production, jointly accounting for 25% of Ukraine’s total.

Agricultural production: In 2013 the Donetsk and Luhansk regions ranked No. 10 and 19, respectively, among Ukrainian regions2 in terms of the value of their agricultural production, accounting jointly for 7% of Ukraine’s total.

USDA map of Ukraine wheat

Source: USDA3

In addition, we have decided to crunch some numbers on two broader indicators typically measured when calculating the national power of countries: economic output and population. Here’s what we found:

Economy: In 2013 the Donetsk and Luhansk regions ranked No. 2 and 9 among Ukrainian constituent territories in terms of the size of their gross regional product, accounting jointly for 14% of Ukraine’s GDP in 2013.

Population: In 2013 Donetsk and Luhansk regions ranked No. 1 and 7 among Ukrainian constituent territories in terms of the size of their populations, jointly accounting for 14% of Ukraine’s GDP in that year.

As noted at the beginning of this post, the second question to ponder is this: If Donbas is indeed lost to Ukraine, what is it that Russia has gained? That question is much more difficult to answer, as both the population of Donbas and its economic output have shrunk considerably since de facto separation from Ukraine in 2014. For a sense of scale, however: If the population and economic output of Donbas were somehow transferred to Russia in their entirety in 2013, then Donbas’s share in Russia’s output and population would have been about 2%. Therefore, in relative terms, Ukraine’s loss would be greater than Russia’s gain.

Footnotes

  1. There is no “Donbas” administrative unit in Ukraine. There is the Luhansk Oblast (province or region) and the Donetsk Oblast. The Russian side, however, insists that there is a Donetsk People’s Republic, which should comprise all lands within the borders of the Donetsk Oblast, and a Luhansk People’s Republic, which should comprise all lands within the borders of the Luhansk Oblast. It is all these territories that Russia’s present leaders typically have in mind when they refer to Donbas. The toponym itself is derived from two words: Donetsky (Donetsk) and bassein (basin), a reference to a coal basin, most of which is located in the modern-day Donetsk region.  
  2. Three constituent territories—the cities of Kyiv and Sevastopol, as well as the Republic of Crimea—were not included in the count by Ukraine’s statistical agency.
  3. More USDA data on Ukraine’s crop production can be found here.
  4. Here and elsewhere 1 hrvynia = 0.1226 USD, per the average exchange rate in 2013.
  5. This calculation doesn’t include Russia’s de facto control, as of June 26, 2022, of the land bridge from Donbas to Crimea and of Crimea itself.

Photos shared under a Pixabay license.