Sunday, August 14, 2022

The Planet Is Sending Us a Message — And It’s Terrifying

This Is Extinction — And Now You’re Living IT
Aerial view of a forest fire area near Saint-Magne, south-western France.
 Image Credit: Agence France-Presse Handout



 August 13, 2022

I have an admission to make. I was wrong.

I thought — and I wrote — that it would take probably until 2030 or so. To get here.

But let me let the people on the front lines of this calamity speak to you directly themselves.

““There’s nothing left to eat,’ one farmer, Laurent Roux, told the local radio station France Bleu. ‘The terrain is so dry that in places, it looks like ash. It’s dust.’

“‘Our vines are suffering,’ said vintner Xavier Collart Dutilleul, who, with his wife Pascale, runs Château Mazeris Bellevue near Saint-Emilion in southwestern France. Lacking rain, the organic vineyard’s parched clay-rich soil is ‘almost as hard as cement,’ he told Yahoo News, and he predicted that his harvest, which typically yields enough for 35,000 bottles, will be down by 30% this year.”

“We have no water,” said Fabrizio Rizzotti, a seventh-generation rice farmer. ‘The plants are curling up and dying in the fields.’ This year, he expects his harvest of carnaroli rice, favored for risotto, to be 30% of what it was last year.”

“In Spain, which provides nearly half the world’s olive oil, Agricultural Minister Luis Planas last week warned that ‘this year’s olive harvest could be notably lower than previous ones.’ Spain’s Association of Young Farmers and Ranchers (Asaja) predicts that olive yields will drop by a third.”

“‘What’s happening this year is very scary,’ enologist Ton Mata, third-generation owner and CEO of the Recaredo vineyard in Spain’s cava region, Alt Penedès, told Yahoo News. ‘We have little rain and a very long, dry, hot period with three heat waves. We are seeing that the grapes are very small and weigh less.’ Although the harvest is just beginning, he’s sure that the yield will be down by 20% to 40%.”

“…The corn harvest is expected to be 18.5% lower this year and farmers said other cereal and fruit and vegetable crops were suffering.”

“Some of the crops hit by the drought include:

  • Onions and carrots. U.K. growers expect losses of 30 to 40 percent for carrots and at least 25 percent for onions.
  • Potatoes. At least 25 percent of Germany’s harvest is likely to be affected.
  • Corn. Around 60 percent has been destroyed in the Netherlands.
  • Cereals like wheat, barley and oats. At least 35 percent of the harvest has been lost in Sweden.”

“The drought has hit Denmark particularly hard, with the spring harvest of grains and vegetables down 40 to 50 percent, according to Troels Toft, an official with the Danish Agriculture and Food Council. He estimates that the losses will cost the country’s farming industry around $944 million.”

Meanwhile, India stopped exporting wheat because “extremely hot weather” (LOL, aka climate catastrophe) caused such a drop in wheat production, the country needed to save the harvest for itself.

Did you get all that? I’m not trying to overwhelm you, but if you feel overwhelmed, you should be.

The planet is sending us a message, and it’s terrifying.

But are we listening?

Let me start over with what I was wrong about, exactly. I said — thought, forecast, predicted, whatever you’d like to call it — that it would take us getting to the end of this decade or so for this to happen. What is “this”? For “climate change” — Extinction — to cause genuine and immediate catastrophic system failures to our civilization.

But, like I said, I was wrong. It didn’t take until the end of this decade. It is happening now. And it’s just 2022. That is flat-out terrifying.

Why? Am I just fear-mongering? Just trying to scare you?

My friends, when Europe’s crops are beginning to fall by 30%, in some cases 50%, that is about as grave a calamity as a society can begin to experience. It is a really big deal.

But you know what the irony is? Most people don’t think so. They see these desperate farmers, going bankrupt, absolutely shocked at the way the planet’s changed before their very eyes — and they ignore them. I’ve been talking with people about this. Just average people. At my little European dog park. And you know what? Nobody cares. The general attitude is blasé. Shrug — so what? We’ll get by. Ah, but will we?

Let me say. We are now beginning to experience widespread, massive crop failures as a result of “climate change.” Get that far, and at least you begin to understand something. But even that’s a poor, limited way to think of it. A better way? Extinction is coming. For our water and our crops. They are dying too.

So what about us?

The reason that most people don’t think any of this matters is sadly, very simple. My little dog park is in an affluent neighborhood, in a rich city. It’s full of city people, who are my friends and neighbors. But the last thing they are is farmers. To them, the production of basics — water, food, energy, medicine — is an abstraction. They can feel the heat in the park itself, and see the dogs panting, and even coo over them. But they are unable to really make the link between Extinction and Catastrophe — between climate change and the crop failure and what happens as a result of it.

Cities are concentrations of power and wealth. In our societies, money and authority reside there. And cities, throughout history, make the same mistake. They ignore the signals coming from the edges. The places which produce things. Cities don’t produce much — they never have. Whether it’s agriculture or manufacturing, things have been produced outside the avenues of power and fortune. And so just as Rome ignored the barbarians, so too, we’re ignoring the signals coming from the edges of our industrial-carbon empire.

But listen. Listen to the farmers. The way they are speaking about what is happening to the planet is absolutely shocking and terrifying. The despair and sorrow in their words points to something almost inexpressible. They speak of death, my friends. Of soil turned to ashes, of livestock dying, of crops withering. Our farmers are now speaking the language of Extinction.

But we are not listening, and by not listening, we’re making just the same mistake so, so many civilizations have — from Rome to Athens and beyond. In comfortable air-conditioned bubbles in great cities, the rest of us assume, blithely, that things will just…go on. Hey! I do my job, right! That’s their job! The farmer’s job is to farm! They’ll figure it out. And then, having gotten angry about things they know nothing about, city dwellers add insult to ignorance — and tell farmers to “just grow something else” or “just move north” or what have you. We’re not listening.

So let me say it again.

We are now in an era where some of climate change’s most dramatic and shocking impacts are already beginning to be felt. Our crops are failing and our water supplies are drying up. Extinction is coming for our water and food, and there’s nothing more basic than that.

And more than that, it wasn’t supposed to happen for another decade. Why does that matter? It matters intensely. For the following reason. You see, the world, such as it is, the political world, has a loose agreement to reach “net zero” by 2050. And for the last decade or so, it’s been thought, by politicians, leaders, pundits, that that would be OK. We’d have some brushes with disaster, but get things right by 2050, and the worst impacts of climate change would have been averted.

We’d be living on a hotter planet — but not that much hotter, one just a degree or a half warmer. There’d be a few hot days every now and then — but we’d get by. Without systemic transformation, meaning that our systems for water and agriculture and manufacturing could go on much as they were. Geographically, financially, temporally, spatially, energetically — they could use the same resources, and produce the same yields, and therefore, us city dwellers, who have all the money and power, would go on living our comfortable, cosseted lives, and through all that, democracy would be just fine in the end.

But all of that is being unravelled at the most fundamental level now. Because if we’re beginning to face dramatic, shocking impacts of climate change like mass droughts and crop failures now, in 2022 — when they weren’t supposed to happen for another decade or so — then what hope do we really have of making it to 2050?

Let me put that more concretely. Take any of the statistics about crop failures above — which come again, straight from the sources themselves. Olives, down 30%, corn, 20%, carrots and onions 25%, grapes, 30% — doesn’t matter which one. You don’t have to think very hard to understand the terrifying conclusion. This is just 2022. What happens by 2030? What happens when an entire country — or continent’s — yield of basic crops is down by 50%?

The answer is frightening, and I’m sure I don’t have to spell it out for you. Inflation sets in, prices skyrocket, people panic, shortages ensue, food has to be rationed, everything comes apart. Democracy begins to fail, people turn on each other, demagogues find convenient scapegoats for these woes — just as they’ve done for everything else recently — and there’s a Big Bang of authoritarian fascism, as societies plunge into poverty, instability, and chaos.

We are in an incredibly serious situation. We don’t understand that we’re in one, because nobody’s listening to the people on the Front Lines of Extinction. Farmers. Hydrologists. Climate scientists. We’re all ignoring them, in increasingly shamefully idiotic ways. Hey — what’s Captain America wearing now!? OMG!! Look, it’s the Marvel Cinematic Universe!!

(My God, the stupidity actually hurts. These days, the planet’s literally dying before our eyes, and the average person cares more about superheroes, like a goddamned four year old. And then they get mad at me when I point it out. Farmers and hydrologist and scientists are out there begging, pleading to be heard, but no. We’ve regressed into infantile narcissism, and nothing can tear us puerile city dwellers away from our new creature comforts — superhero movies, instaculture, plastic surgery, fake friends on apps, making fools’ games of what could have been lives. But I digress, I just find it unbelievably idiotic that people are like this.)

What would you call it if you were running out of food and water? Sorry — not the city dweller’s way, as in the easy, baffled answer of “But I’ll just…go to the store!” I mean: what if you were really running out of food and water? Imagine yourself hiking and lost, or camping and you fell and injured yourself, or trapped in some infernal maze — doesn’t matter. Just: what would you call it?

You’d call it an emergency.

That is what we’re in now. Not the way we were before — the abstract, “long” emergency, in which one distant day, something bad would, might, could, happen, far in the future, according to some nerd, with some math, and some facts. Yawn. Who cares? Not that kind of emergency. We’re in a real one. An immediate one. An existential emergency.

It is no joke when crop failure and droughts this severe afflict a planet from Europe to America to India and beyond. We city dwellers have to wake up. We are making the same mistake civilizations have made before us. We ignore the signals from the regions, hinterlands, fields, at our peril. Our ignorance goes on to cost everyone their futures, because power and money reside with us, but we are too lazy and indolent to lift much of a finger fast enough.

When I talk to my city dwelling friends about all this, their mental model of what climate change does is totally inadequate. They rationalize it, amazingly enough, by saying to me, in short, “Yeah, it’s getting hotter. But a few hot days? So what! I’ll survive…and so will everything else!”

But everything else is not a city dweller. My friends make the mistake of applying their experience to everything, instead of trying to widen their experience.

What do “a few hot days” really do? They killThey kill crops. They dry up water sources. They turn the fields to ash.

My city dwelling friends don’t appear to understand this simple fact at all. They appear to think that because they can survive “a few hot days,” so can everything else. But that is eminently not the case. The ‘few hot days’ are, in actuality, peaks of extreme heat, in a rapidly warming climate — and those peaks of extreme heat, coupled with rapid warming, are absolute killers. For what? For the basics of our civilization. Food, water, medicine, energy, yes even energy — think of how Britain’s energy supplies are now threatened, and it’s planning for blackouts, because droughts in Norway have reduced what it can power Britain with.

We are in an existential emergency. It will last decades. The serious “impacts of climate change” are now arriving. They are crossing the threshold from theory to reality, and we are beginning now to experience them, in terrifying ways. First we had megafires and megafloods. Now we have mass crop failures and megadroughts. See the acceleration?

It wasn’t supposed to happen this fast. But it is. And we aren’t listening. To the message the planet is sending us. To the message all those on the Front Lines of Extinction have for the rest of us.

This isn’t a Marvel Movie you’re watching, it’s not the goddamned Avengers Versus Octo-Spider-Bat-Super-Man, this isn’t a comic book your glazed eyes are reading, this isn’t a theory you’re debating, this isn’t an app to swipe right on and giggle. And you’re not a goddamned four year old. You’re an adult. This is something we need to face, head on.

This is Extinction. And you’re living it.


umair haque
Use of facial recognition technology gets mixed reviews

Black respondents were generally skeptical about its use, but some say it's OK in come cases

Ray Marcano | THE GRIO
Aug 13, 2022


The use of facial recognition technology gets mixed responses from Black people, with some deeming it acceptable in certain instances but a larger share having reservations about the tool than those of other races.

Those are the results of a Pew Research Center poll last month that examined the use of facial recognition technology by police.

“We’ve asked some questions around facial recognition software a couple of years ago and again we see some patterns in which Black Americans stand out as being less accepting, more skeptical,” Monica Anderson, Pew’s associate director of research, told theGrio. “That’s one of the key takeaways for me, not just in this survey, but we saw it in some previous work as well.”

In this Oct. 7, 2020, file photo, a video surveillance camera is installed on the ceiling above a subway platform in the Court Street station in the Brooklyn borough of New York.
 (AP Photo/Mark Lennihan, File)

The survey, released on July 14, found that 29% of Black Americans believe law enforcement’s use of facial recognition technology would make policing less fair. Just 22% believed it would make policing more fair, far lower than Hispanics (40%) and whites (36%) surveyed by Pew.

The survey also showed that almost half of Black people (48%) believe authorities would use the technology to monitor neighborhoods of color more often than others. Some 28% of Black respondents believe authorities would use the technology to make false arrests.



Even putting in safeguards isn’t enough to quell the suspicion.

“They were less likely, for example, to say things like (the technology) would be better if people without criminal records could opt out of the facial recognition database,” Anderson noted. “They also were not necessarily sold on the idea that training would be the thing that would help mitigate errors.



“What we see with Black Americans is even additional things like training notifications, having people opt out, they were still less likely to be on board with” the technology, Anderson added.

Interestingly, the poll also showed almost half of all Americans, regardless of race, favored using the technology to monitor protests. Overall, 46% of Americans, including 4 in 10 Black respondents, said the use of the technology would be good for society.



Emily Vogels, a research associate at Pew, noted the seeming disparity in the answers.

“There are some interesting things going on where we see this thread of concerns and skepticism where Black adults stand out, but then other times see that their views are very similar to adults from other racial and ethnic backgrounds,” she told theGrio.

The survey isn’t the last word, rather it’s another step in the process of understanding how Black Americans feel about facial recognition technology and its use.

There’s a complicating factor in that some people might not truly understand what facial recognition technology is and how it works.

In short, the technology matches a face against an image to determine a possible match. Black Americans aren’t the only group skeptical about its use. The American Civil Liberties has been a leader in fighting the use of the technology, calling it a “threat to our privacy and civil liberties.”

They also note the case of Robert Williams, a Detroit man arrested and held in jail for 30 hours based on a faulty identification. Williams, with the help of the ACLU and the University of Michigan Law School’s Civil Rights Litigation Initiative, filed a lawsuit against the Detroit Police Department.

Additionally, the New York Times has reported about two other Black men were jailed based on a bad match.

Also Read:
Robots became racist after AI training, always chose Black faces as ‘criminals’

Anderson noted the correlation between the findings in this survey and ones in the past that examined trust and policing.

“Although this survey particularly didn’t ask specific questions about attitudes about policing, we know from past research there’s wide gaps when it comes to attitudes about fairness and policing,” Anderson said.

“Black Americans [stand] out as being particularly skeptical, less trustworthy, more concerned about what’s happening nationwide, and what’s happening in their local communities.”
Meet a Canadian man who's sharing his vasectomy experience to encourage men there and in the US post-Roe v. Wade

Yelena Dzhanova
Olivier Charbonneau. Courtesy of Olivier Charbonneau

Olivier Charbonneau, a 28-year-old from Canada, got a vasectomy in November.

When the Supreme Court decided to overturn Roe v. Wade, he shared his experience on Facebook.

"You are not dancing tango alone, so we have to share the responsibility," he said, encouraging other men to get one, too.


The news of the the Supreme Court decision to overturn Roe v. Wade enraged Olivier Charbonneau — even though he doesn't live in the US.

The 28-year-old is from Canada and had gotten a vasectomy just months before the Supreme Court decision. And once the news dropped, he used social media to persuade other men to do the same.

"Vasectomy is a safe alternative to female birth control. Contraception is not only on women but on us men," he wrote in a lengthy Facebook post in June. "Be smart, make the right choice."




In an interview with Insider, Charbonneau said he had noticed that only his female friends had ever spoken or thought about birth control.

"Women were talking about how shocked they were about what happening in the US," he said. "But men, they were all silent. No one was talking about it."

Despite the fact that he does not live in the US, Charbonneau said the news is still applicable to him and to other Canadians. Even though the decision was teased in May, when Politico published a draft Supreme Court opinion signaling a reversal of Roe v. Wade, the news shocked Charbonneau, because, he said, "it's not impossible that people will try to do the same here."

"Here in Canada, we are kind of protected," he said. "But what will happen if it were here, if the loss of rights were in Canada instead?"

At the same time, speaking out in favor of vasectomies is a way to show solidarity with women in the US, he said.

"I realized that we had stepped back for the progression of the woman's rights," he said. "We are taking a step back, we're taking away rights."

He added, "I think in the US, I'm like, 'Whoa, it's a huge, huge regression about the rights. You can't even decide if you want to keep it or not."

The Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in June, leaving the legality of abortion in the hands of individual states.

By overturning Roe, the Supreme Court has essentially made it illegal in at least 22 states to obtain an abortion. Additional restrictions are expected in several other states.


DON'T WANT TO GET CUT THEN FOLLOW THE ADVICE


Charbonneau got his vasectomy done in November last year at age 27. He was in a relationship at the time and he didn't want the burden of birth control to fall exclusively on his girlfriend, he said.

"You are not dancing tango alone, so we have to share the responsibility," he told Insider.

He described the procedure as a simple process that took about two weeks. He pointed out that women have a harder time getting access to reproductive healthcare.

In Canada, "They're going to tell you, 'Oh, you're too young. ... But one day you're going to want to have [a] kid,'" he said. "So it's very hard for women here" to get preventative reproductive care that will prohibit the possibility of getting pregnant.

"It's painless. It was free. It was covered by the health insurance," he said.

Since speaking out about his own vasectomy, Charbonneau said men have been asking him about the process, seemingly because they're considering getting one themselves.

"People are curious about it," he said, adding that he wants men "to understand that they have responsibilities in the birth control" world.
CRIMINAL CYBER CAPITALI$M
Google ordered to pay $43 million by Australian court for misleading users

August 13, 2022

Australia's Federal Court has ordered Google to pay A$60 million ($42.7 million) in penalties for misleading users on collection of their personal location data, reports Reuters.

The court found Google breached Australia’s Consumer Law between January 2017 and December 2018 by misleading customers about location data collected through their Android devices.

The court previously found that Google had breached the Australian Consumer Law by representing to some Android users that a setting titled “Location History” was the only setting that affected whether Google used personally identifiable data about a user’s location. However, another Google account setting — “Web & App Activity” — also enabled Google to collect, store and use personally identifiable location data, according to Australia’s Competition & Consumer Commission (ACCC.)
OP-ED

THE MASKED SINGER (HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSER): U.S. POLICY IN MACEDONIA



Читај на македонски




August 13, 2022

It's a New Kind of Reality Competition

Human rights abuses must be condemned no matter the perpetrator. But that is not the American way. The American way is to condemn abuses unless they’re committed by the United States or a U.S.-backed proxy.

Continuing the “American way” theme, I’ve found a new way of exposing U.S. foreign policy hypocrisy – a reality TV competition! Let’s play The Masked Human Rights Abuser:

For those unfamiliar with the premise: we’ll conceal the identity of the abuser; outline the abuse; conduct a vote on whether it should be condemned; then we expose the abuser, aka “the big reveal”! A second vote, testing hypocrisy, is then held.

Ready? Round One!

The contestant, along with members of the brutal regime in Macedonia, forcibly holds female opposition MPs in chambers and threatens to arrest their family members unless they agree to follow instructions on upcoming votes in order to benefit the contestant’s country and their “strategic partners”.

Your vote? Guilty? You are correct! And the perpetrator is…U.S. Ambassador to Macedonia, Jess Baily!

American foreign policy dictates that you immediately change your vote and either ignore the abuse, deny it, spin it to justify it, and, of course, blame [insert current U.S. enemy here].

But will you defend human rights or only if the oppressor and oppressed suit you? If you answered the latter, your ideal career path is: U.S. politician or political pundit.

But why would Baily do this? To force through the Macedonia name change to the highly offensive “North Macedonia” (designed to eradicate Macedonian identity, culture and history), thus appeasing Greece’s demand to change Macedonia’s name and removing its veto of Macedonia’s U.S.-imposed NATO membership bid. The benefit for the U.S.? Increased NATO membership and U.S. imperialism! The benefit for Greece? American assistance in fulfilling its number one policy directive — denying the existence and persecution of its large Macedonian minority and eradicating the existence of Macedonians as an ethnic group!

Ready for Round Two? Let’s go!

Macedonians are protesting against U.S. foreign interference and the upcoming forced name change. The contestant orders riot police to attack, brutally beat, and arrest civilians. Intimidation, threats, attacks, and arrests continue daily. Macedonians are sentenced to 15 years in prison, subject to abhorrent conditions, and are targets of more beatings in jail.

The contestant who ordered the attacks is guilty? Of course!

It is actually contestants, plural, and they are both U.S. political parties, the U.S. State Department, U.S. Embassy in Macedonia, and the U.S.-installed regime in Macedonia!

Again, do you change your vote or do you stand up for human rights? U.S. foreign policy dictates that you defy logic and invent ridiculous charges to ensure that human rights defenders are locked up — because they stand in the way of racist U.S. foreign policy. For bonus points, use the exact charges that the U.S. condemns as fabricated in [insert current U.S. enemy country here].

We could go on with rounds and rounds of The Masked Human Rights Abuser — I even had a lightning round ready in case of a tie — but I think we all agree: human rights abuses must be condemned no matter the perpetrator. Now, act on it. Condemn U.S. abuses and interventionism. Defend Macedonians’ right to exist.

Bill Nicholov, President
Macedonian Human Rights Movement International
twitter.com/billnicholov



PRESS RELEASE


MHRMI, KARAKAMISHEVA-JOVANOVSKA LAUNCH EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS CASE TO OVERTURN FORCED MACEDONIA NAME CHANGE

July 26, 2022

Macedonian Human Rights Movement International has launched another case in the European Court of Human Rights, the latest being in conjunction with Tanja Karakamisheva-Jovanovska, Full Professor of Macedonian Constitutional Law.

Leading up to, and as a result of the forced name change — illegally imposed by the regime in Macedonia through the "Prespa Agreement" — serious violations of human rights have been committed against Macedonians and continue to increase exponentially.

At its core, the illegal, forced name change violates multiple human rights conventions to which Macedonia has ratified, is in direct violation of Macedonian and international law, the Macedonian constitution, parliamentary rules and procedures, and thus, has no standing.

Further, the forced name change is a direct cause of the vast human rights violations being committed against Macedonians and, as such, MHRMI and Karakamisheva-Jovanovska seek to overturn it and reinstate Macedonia's name based on, and by invoking, the following Articles of the European Convention on Human Rights, all of which the regime continuously violates:Protocol 1, Article 2 - The right to education
Article 3 – Prohibition of torture and cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment
Article 6 – Right to a fair trial
Article 8 – Right to respect for private and family life
Article 9 – Freedom of thought, conscience and religion
Article 10 – Freedom of expression
Article 13 – Right to an effective remedy
Article 14 – Prohibition of discrimination

Professor Karakamisheva-Jovanovska explains:

"Human rights and the need for their constant and consistent affirmation and protection is a motive for action from every reasonable human being. When human rights, whether individual or collective, are blatantly trampled upon, the most natural human reaction is to embark on their unreserved protection. Hence, the world should understand that we, the Macedonians will never give up our Macedonian identity, our Macedonian language, our history and civilization, our past, present, future. At a time when the existence of the Macedonian people and the Macedonian language is most brazenly denied by European institutions and European states, there is no other way but to express resistance to these actions and loudly protest against this cultural genocide. In the 21st century, it is impermissible to change the identity of a nation just because of the whims of that nation's neighbours. We call on the international community to defend our rights to be who we are - Macedonians from Macedonia."

Trajche Torov, the lawyer retained by MHRMI and Karakamisheva-Jovanovska in this case and by MHRMI in other, ongoing ECHR cases, describes the latest court case:

"The forced name change also caused a forced identity change on all Macedonians, and, for a person living in the Republic of Macedonia, such as Karakamisheva-Jovanovska, a forced change of her identity on her personal documents, censorship of her thoughts as an author, writer, and educator, a profoundly negative impact on the mindset of her children, the censorship of their school books and change of their curriculum to suppress any expression of Macedonian identity, the removal and desecration of Macedonian cultural and historical monuments, limitations imposed on the Macedonian language, and mass foreign interventionism in executing the ban on expressing Macedonian ethnic identity and self-determination. Karakamisheva-Jovanovska first sought protection by the domestic Constitutional Court, but due to its clear lack of impartiality and independence from the regime, her case was expressly rejected. So we now lodged a case in front of the European Court of Human Rights. We hope that the ECHR will protect her human rights and stop the modern-day cultural genocide of Macedonians."



Macedonian Human Rights Movement International (MHRMI) has been active on human and national rights issues for Macedonians and other oppressed peoples since 1986. MHRMI demands respect for Macedonia's name, identity and human rights for oppressed Macedonians in the Balkans. 

For more information: 1-416-850-7125,
#OurNameIsMacedonia

OP-ED

US SUPPORTS CULTURAL GENOCIDE IN MACEDONIA AND IMPRISONMENT OF DISSIDENTS AS PART OF ITS GEO-STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT WITH GREECE


May 24, 2022

But few Americans seem to know or care

Article by MHRMI President Bill Nicholov published in US anti-imperialism media outlet Covert Action Magazine (CAM), dedicated to exposing US covert action worldwide:

https://covertactionmagazine.com/2022/05/23/u-s-supports-cultural-genocide-in-macedonia-and-imprisonment-of-dissidents-as-part-of-its-geo-strategic-alignment-with-greece/

[Note from the Editors of Covert Action Magazine: CAM uses the name “Macedonia”—rather than the imposed “North Macedonia”—as we respect the Macedonian people’s right to self-determination and their own name, identity and history.]



Macedonian girl calling for the release of her father, a political prisoner jailed for opposing the U.S.-installed regime in Macedonia.

The former U.S. ambassador to Macedonia, Jess Baily, presided over the imprisonment of the father of the girl featured in the above photo.

Baily did the same for riot police attacks on innocent civilians, threats against their families, election fixing, shutting down media and imposing prison sentences for journalists, blocking social media access for individuals and media outlets, firing thousands of Macedonians from public and private sector jobs, outlawing and criminalizing the use of the term “Macedonia”, investigating and intimidating Macedonian civilians including physical attacks and arson, and yes, imprisoning even more Macedonians and subjecting them all to abhorrent prison conditions.

Their “crime”? Opposing U.S. interventionism in Macedonia and the U.S. policy of eradicating Macedonia’s name, identity, culture and history in order to appease our oppressors.

You would oppose U.S. policy too.

In one of Baily’s most infamous acts, he and several members of the U.S.-installed regime in Macedonia held female opposition MPs in parliamentary chambers against their will, blackmailed and threatened them and their family members with imprisonment until they followed orders to vote to change Macedonia’s name.



But how could all of this be a policy of the self-proclaimed “global leader in spreading democracy and human rights”? One could also ask why the U.S. formerly viewed Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden as allies, why they overthrow governments worldwide, and why they either invade or start proxy wars and kill millions of innocent civilians.

The short—and only—answer is imperialism. Nothing will stand in the way of the United States imposing its will on the rest of the world. Not human rights, innocent lives, basic decency. Nothing.

In Macedonia’s case, the United States deemed it a priority to increase NATO membership at any cost so it sided with Greece and its campaign—publicly admitted and celebrated—of cultural genocide against Macedonians. As part of the United States’ policy to expand its influence and empire, it has an important military base on Crete and wanted to especially fortify ties with the Greek government after its relations with Turkey began to fray.

Greece had pledged to veto Macedonia’s U.S.-imposed NATO membership bid unless its name was changed, and everything Macedonian was eradicated.

Vast human rights abuses against an entire ethnic group? Of course the United States was in. And they were not alone.



Macedonian prison where political prisoners are housed. [Source: republika.mk]

Bulgaria saw Greece’s “success” so, in a ramp-up of their own generations-old campaign of cultural genocide against Macedonians, they pledged to veto Macedonia’s Western-imposed European Union membership bid unless even more of its own anti-Macedonian demands were met, and they even threw in attacks against Jews in the region.

As a result of Greece and Bulgaria’s Western-enabled anti-Macedonian campaigns, there are now multiple treaties that outline how Macedonians are “permitted” to define ourselves. As I said on a panel discussion on Turkey’s international news channel, TRT World, “There is a 19-page document telling me who I am. Does this seem normal?”

This document is, ironically, known as the “Prespa Agreement”, and was overwhelmingly rejected by Macedonians in a referendum on September 30, 2018. In it, Article 7(2) officially hands over the term “Macedonia” to Greece, and renders the entire Macedonian population in Aegean Macedonia (annexed by Greece in 1913) as non-existent. Article 8(5) mandates that a panel of Greek diplomats rewrite Macedonian history and that Macedonian textbooks be rewritten to officially remove any trace of our existence.



Protest in Macedonia against the forced name change. The sign displays the slogan of Macedonian Human Rights Movement International: “Nobody has the right to change our name and identity – Our Name Is Macedonia”

Bulgaria’s demands include additions to the ironically named “Agreement on Friendship and Good Neighbourliness,” which renounces the existence of Macedonians in Pirin Macedonia (annexed by Bulgaria in 1913), and declarations that Macedonians never existed and are “really Bulgarian.” They also rewrite Macedonian—and Jewish—history to erase any reference to Bulgarian persecution of Macedonians, including the removal of any reference to Bulgaria’s alliance with Nazi Germany during World War II, occupation of Macedonia, and deportation of more than 7,000 Macedonian Jews to the Treblinka death camp in Poland.


Adolf Hitler receives King Boris III of Bulgaria at his headquarters following the collapse of Yugoslavia, April 25, 1941. [Source: wikipedia.org]

How do the U.S., NATO and EU respond? By calling on (read: threatening) Macedonia to “compromise.” Leading up to the forced name change, a slew of international interventionists, including EU Commissioner for European Neighborhood and Enlargement Negotiations Johannes Hahn, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, High Representative of the EU for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Federica Mogherini, multiple U.S. Secretaries of Defense and Secretaries of State—both Democratic and Republican—have all visited Macedonia to issue blatant threats. The common message, “Change your name or else.”

Subsequently, as per Western orders, every applicable Macedonian and international law, parliamentary rule, constitutional law, human rights convention, and even a referendum, were all violated or ignored to force through the name change to the highly offensive “North Macedonia,” a name specifically designed to eradicate Macedonians’ ethnic identity.

Forget “silence is complicity”; in the West’s case, they are blatantly and “proudly” complicit. And Western media follow their leaders/bosses.Politico EU described a Bulgarian politician’s speech denying Macedonians’ ethnic identity as“a very long and emotional”one.

Politicochose to side with notorious human rights abuser Bulgaria, convicted more than a dozen times by the European Court of Human Rights, in its position to deny Macedonians their basic rights to self-determination and self-identification. And without reservation or condemnation, Reuters published Bulgarian Foreign Minister Ekaterina Zakharieva’s statement outlining Bulgaria’s chilling policy regarding Macedonians:

“Our concerns come from the never-ending claims for a Macedonian minority in Bulgaria. The acknowledgment of Bulgarian roots would put an end to this.”



Ekaterina Zakharieva [Source: wikimedia.org]

Replace Macedonians (our oppressors are trying to) with any other ethnic group and there would be an immediate outcry in defence of human rights. Do Macedonians not count? Not in the Western world’s eyes. Macedonians are clearly expendable in the West’s supposed campaign to “defend human rights and self-identification.” These policies have prompted me to ask every leader, foreign minister, politician, diplomat, bureaucrat and journalist I’ve ever met—“You wouldn’t give away your ethnic identity, so why should Macedonians?”

The shocking irony is that, after Macedonia’s partition in 1913 among Serbia, Greece, Bulgaria and, in 1919, Albania, and each country brutally denying the existence of the “M” word and trying to wipe out any trace of Macedonia and Macedonians, Greece suddenly, in 1988, began claiming that the name “Macedonia” belonged to them. Greek officials, including former Greek Prime Minister Constantine Mitsotakis, even admitted in 1995 that the so-called “name dispute” had nothing to do with Macedonia’s name, but everything to do with hiding Greece’s policy of denying the existence—and cultural genocide—of the large Macedonian minority in Greece.



Constantine Mitsotakis [Source: wikipedia.org]

This led me to ask another question of the aforementioned group:“What would happen if the English claimed that the names of Indigenous groups belonged to them — does that mean colonization and brutalization of Indigenous lands and people didn’t happen?”This is exactly what Greece will have you believe about Macedonia and Macedonians. They’re selling the idea that, if you own the name, identity and history of the oppressed, no oppression could possibly have occurred.

Many more analogies spring to mind and I have asked them all of several political leaders, including Canada’s Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland. One of my “favourites” is an analogy to France, as French governments have traditionally been unabashedly anti-Macedonian and pro-Greek (and now pro-Bulgarian): I’ve asked what they would do if Germany demanded that France change its name to “West France,” declare that the name “France” now belongs to Germany, as does the French identity, language and culture and, let’s not forget to add the revision of French history to declare that Nazi Germany did not invade, occupy and brutalize France, and that it was an “administrator” and “liberator” of France. Welcome to Macedonia’s world.

Back to the ringleader—the United States. The U.S. State Department officials I have met with know all of this—and they do not care. As they have told me, they “execute the direction of the president.” Execute being the key word. Since the beginning of the United States’ foreign policy switch almost eight decades ago to being outwardly interventionist, Macedonians have experienced all of the weapons in the U.S. arsenal, both literally and figuratively.



Little did my family know that, soon after this photo was taken during World War II, the US and UK would start bombing Macedonian villages–in support of Greek fascism.

Despite being on the Allied side in both world wars, Macedonians were the target of U.S. and UK terror after World War II because these “beacons of democracy” chose to aid Greece, its ruling Nazi-supporting fascists, and its policy of complete eradication of Macedonians in its pursuit of creating a country that is “culturally pure” and rid of anyone “inferior.”

If a country aligns with U.S. and UK foreign policy, despite mimicking Nazi tactics and committing genocide, they will support it. And did they ever. The U.S. and UK dropped bombs all over the Aegean part of Macedonia (annexed by Greece earlier in the century)—deliberately targeting civilians—and murdering countless Macedonians, many members of my family included.

The U.S. has since expanded its terrorist repertoire to include modern methods of cultural genocide while still employing “classic” methods of invasion, occupation and murder (or getting a U.S. proxy to do the dirty work) in many countries. (Side note: You can see that the UK started obeying its American little brother long before the Iraq invasion and “WMD” debacle.)

Now to more of the United States’ modern methods: Before Jess Baily’s assault on Macedonia, the United States had gone through a myriad of ambassadors executing its united Democratic/Republican anti-Macedonian policy (see, bipartisanship does exist!).

This policy included: a) starting a civil war; b) supporting neo-Nazi Albanian separatist groups; c) granting them amnesty despite being convicted of terrorism and murder; and d) awarding them with high-level government posts (the more kills, the higher the post). This all lay the groundwork for: a) the forced Macedonia name change; b) forced Macedonia NATO membership; c) increased U.S. imperialism; and d) eventually (possibly not that far off), another partition of Macedonia’s territory.



Albanian separatists supported by the U.S. [Source: kosovo.net]

And since Baily’s departure from Macedonia, the U.S. has replaced him with other sadistic stooges, who are also not shy about their goals to eradicate Macedonians’ ethnic identity, including the enabling of daily anti-Macedonian hate speech and crackdown on Macedonians’ rights by Greek and Bulgarian government officials, and enabling physical attacks by Greek and Bulgarian secret police and neo-Nazis (yet again) against their large Macedonian minorities.

We have seen what happens to Macedonians in Macedonia when they oppose U.S. policy. But what happens to Macedonians abroad? We become the targets of an executive order by Joe Biden banning critics from entering, and owning property in, the United States.

Well, you can cross the U.S. off my list of potential vacation destinations as this executive order puts me on the U.S. blacklist—for having the “audacity” to stand up for the human rights that they claim to defend. Biden has now joined the United States’ anti-Macedonian “strategic partner” Greece, which blacklisted me two decades earlier. Originality is not his strong suit.

But being blacklisted is a blessing. It keeps me from seeing Joe Biden and subsequent U.S. presidents and their minions from preaching/lying to the world in person. As I have asked so many of them,“How do you sleep at night?”And since I am on an inquisitive theme, I will leave you with this and ask those who claim to defend democracy, human rights and the rule of law,“How long will you keep letting the United States, literally, get away with murder?”

Bill Nicholov, President
Macedonian Human Rights Movement International
twitter.com/billnicholov

Democrats’ ‘Climate Bill’ Puts Polluters before People and the Planet

Congressional Democrats, supported by President Biden, just passed a major spending bill focused on climate change, health care, and taxes. But it’s no win for the climate or the working class.



Robert Belano 
August 13, 2022
LEFTVOICE.ORG
Jim Watson/AFP via Getty Images

After an embarrassing past few months which included the overturning of Roe v. Wade, rising inflation, a stalled legislative agenda, and Nancy Pelosi’s ill-advised visit to Taiwan, Biden and the Democratic leadership were desperate for a victory. A small win for the party has arrived in the form of the so-called Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), approved by Congress on Friday and soon to be signed into law by Biden. Two years of inaction on carbon emissions — and increasingly devastating extreme weather events, like flooding in Kentucky and droughts in the western U.S. — also amped up the pressure to pass climate legislation.

The “climate conscious” establishment — the corporate-owned liberal media outlets, the environmental nonprofits, the think tanks, and Democratic politicians — have generally hailed the agreement as a saving grace. The liberal economist Paul Krugman’s recent New York Times op-Ed is bombastically titled “Did the Democrats Just Save Civilization?” The response to the bill has been more muted among climate activists, but many on the reformist Left have accepted it as a step forward despite its problems. As Jacobin’s Branco Marcetic put it “The Biden-Manchin Climate Bill isn’t very good, but it’s all we’ve got.”

But what if “all we’ve got” keeps us on a trajectory above 2°C warming, a scenario that puts the homes of tens of millions in coastal cities around the world underwater, makes large sections of the Earth uninhabitable, and fuels more numerous and more deadly fires, storms, and droughts? And what if, at the same time, “all we’ve got” keeps billions flowing annually into the coffers of the same fossil fuel companies and auto manufacturers that created this disaster? What relief should we feel then?

The deal is emblematic of the Democratic Party’s strategy: a few token concessions to the multi-racial and working-class party base, and massive giveaways to the true directors of the party, big business and Wall Street. Although the bill stimulates the development of some renewables, the IRA actually promotes the expansion of fossil fuel extraction, tying any funding for non-fossil energy projects on federal lands to leases for new oil and gas projects.

Of course, the Democratic Party could never be expected to deliver a bill that would truly put the needs of the planet and its people first. That objective would necessarily contradict capitalist logic, which rests on minimal business regulations, low corporate taxes, and low wages. Party leaders will try to pass this bill off as a win for business, climate, and working people. But the real benefits are heavily weighted on the corporate end of the scale, the same actors most responsible for the climate emergency itself.

What’s in the Bill and What’s Not

The more than 700-page IRA includes provisions related to climate, inflation, healthcare, and corporate taxes, among others. Democrats were initially fearful that the party’s most conservative senators, Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema, would upend the bill, as the two did with Biden’s Build Back Better plan last year. But after weeks of negotiations that included further concessions to fossil fuel, pharmaceutical, and private equity companies, the bill cleared its main obstacle in the Senate.

Around half of the bill’s allocated funding, or $370 billion over 10 years, falls roughly in the category of climate measures. The majority of that is in the form of tax credits for corporations, small businesses, and consumers to incentivize “green” energy production and usage, and to implement energy efficiency in homes and businesses. The funding, while hailed as “sweeping” and “historic” by many media outlets, represents around a one-third reduction of the original Build Back Better climate funding that was spiked by Manchin last year, an amount that was already woefully inadequate.

Its measures must also be put in the context of other federal spending. The IRA’s per-year allocation represents only a small fraction — approximately 5 percent — of the annual U.S. military budget, which now stands at approximately $800 billion. The U.S. military, it should be noted, happens to be the world’s largest polluter. How can we view this legislation seriously considering that?

Furthermore, the bill contains little that can meaningfully reduce carbon emissions. It certainly won’t be enough to keep warming “well below” 2 degrees Celsius, the stated goal of the Paris Agreement, signed onto by Obama in 2015 with much fanfare. It aims for a 40 percent cut in greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 (below the 50 percent reduction agreed to in 2015.) But even this is not backed up with any enforceable measures. Instead, it’s projected to come as a result of tax breaks for companies that elect to transition away from fossil fuels. Above all, the IRA aims to incentivize corporations to take up “green” energy projects or replace their existing fossil fuel-based infrastructure. Any emissions reductions will be the result of a cost-benefit calculation for big businesses — in other words, the bill relies on the same “green capitalist” logic that has failed for decades to make a dent in global carbon emissions.

Included in the bill are billions in tax credits to adopt wind, solar, or geothermal energy, along with nuclear energy and biofuel projects. The latter two sources are not only far from sustainable methods of energy, but in the case of biofuels, a dubious alternative to fossil energy in reducing emissions. There are also tax incentives for consumers to purchase electric vehicles, to improve energy efficiency in homes, or upgrade to “greener” appliances. There is no doubt that new energy efficient technologies are needed. But tax credits for buying electric vehicles ultimately means the manufacturing of millions of new cars at a tremendous energy (and therefore carbon) cost.

Most notably, there are no provisions that curtail the extraction of fossil fuels. Neither are there any timelines imposed on utility companies or auto manufactures to transition away from fossil energy. No penalties exist for companies that maintain emissions at or above current levels. “All carrots, no sticks,” says Paul Krugman of the bill (approvingly.) If fossil fuels remain more profitable than non-fossil energy, corporations may continue burning them without any legal or financial repercussions. Given this, it is hard to comprehend how the plan will achieve its ultimate goal of reducing carbon emissions by 40 percent over the next eight years.

New Funding for Renewables, but at What Cost?

Writing in OpenDemocracy, Aaron White notes that the Manchin-Schumer bill “furthers the US’ most profligate pastimes: drilling oil and driving big cars.” Its tax credits for electric vehicles stimulates the manufacturing of millions of new cars, at an enormous energy cost, while doing nothing to build electric mass transit and reduce the country’s car dependence. Measures to attempt to reduce carbon emissions are accompanied by provisions that encourage the expansion of fossil fuel extraction. Because of this, he and other climate advocates have called it “a climate deal with the devil.”

Incredibly, the IRA stipulates that any new wind or solar projects on federal lands must be accompanied by major expansions in leases for oil and gas drilling. Since investments made by fossil fuel companies into these drilling projects must be recuperated later, fossil fuel combustion can be assumed for many years or even decades into the future. The bill also greenlights new offshore drilling in the Gulf of Mexico and in Alaskan waters.

These provisions are so egregious that the Climate Justice Alliance has determined that the bill’s negative environmental impact actually outweighs any emissions reductions it may cause. The bill also provides funding for new carbon capture facilities, a scheme that, more often than not, serves as a cover for continued coal, oil, and gas production. Nowhere are any of the more progressive elements of the Green New Deal, the supposed “framework” for Biden’s climate agenda during the 2020 elections, such as a jobs guarantee, universal healthcare, or a public works program.

Biden has made good, however, on his promise that “we’re not getting rid of fossil fuels for a long time.” The IRA fails to keep fossil fuels in the ground, and even promotes new extractive activity. It is no win for the climate nor for the majority of the earth’s people. This is the contradiction of the “green capitalism” that the Democrats aspire to. Capitalism is an inherently unsustainable and dirty system of production. While oil, gas, and even coal remain profitable commodities, there will be no meaningful cutbacks to their extraction and consumption. There are alternative solutions that can keep fossil fuels in the ground, provide universal employment, and quality healthcare for all. But they won’t come from this party, which has always put the interests of polluters before the people and the planet.

Robert Belano
 is a writer and editor for Left Voice. He lives in the Washington, DC area.