Sunday, September 25, 2022

Protests in Iran enter second week after young woman’s police-custody death

Protests are continuing for a second week in many of Iran’s major cities following the death of 22-year-old Mahsa Amini at the hands of the clerical regime’s morality police. While the demonstrations are fuelled by popular anger over the terrible social and economic situation in the country and the Shia clerical establishment’s monopoly over political power in the bourgeois Islamic Republic, the imperialist powers are shamelessly seeking to exploit the protests for their own predatory interests.

Protesters chant slogans during a protest over the death of Mahsa Amini. (AP) [AP Photo/FILE PHOTO IS TAKEN BY AN INDIVIDUAL NOT EMPLOYED BY THE ASSOCIATED PRESS AND OBTAINED BY THE AP OUTSIDE IRAN.]

Amini, from the northwestern city of Saqqez in Kurdistan province, was detained in Tehran September 13 for “improperly” wearing a hijab by the notorious morality police, who are responsible for enforcing the Islamic Republic’s strict dress code for women. Amini was visiting the capital with her family at the time. Reports suggest that she was severely beaten by the police, who allegedly struck her over the head with a baton and slammed her against a police vehicle. She was taken to hospital after falling into a coma and died three days later. In a clumsy attempt to calm public anger, the authorities made the improbable claim that the young woman died of a heart attack or a brain hemorrhage unrelated to any injury. Her family have rejected such assertions, declaring that Amini had no health problems.

As of Friday, state media reported that 35 people have died since the protests began, including five members of the security forces. Exile groups have reported as many as 50 deaths, with several children among them. Activists associated with these anti-regime groups released footage that appeared to show security forces firing live rounds at protesters. Hundreds of political activists and regime opponents have been rounded up and detained in raids.

The protests initially began in cities in western Iran dominated by the Kurdish minority, of which Amini was a member. As the week progressed, they spread to Tehran and other cities, where much if not most of their explicit support came from university campuses. Prominent slogans in the demonstrations have included “Death to the dictator,” a reference to Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei, and “Women, life, freedom!” in Kurdish.

President Ibrahim Raisi, who belongs to the conservative hard-line faction of the clerical establishment, vowed Saturday to “decisively confront” protesters. Security forces must “deal decisively with those who oppose the country’s security and tranquillity,” he was reported by state media as saying during a call to a family of a deceased security service member. Access to the internet, including popular social media channels like Instagram and WhatsApp, has been heavily restricted by the authorities since Wednesday in a bid to curb the protests.

Earlier in the week, Raisi sought to strike a more conciliatory tone, pledging a full investigation into Amini’s death after speaking to her family. Since coming to power in 2021, Raisi—a prominent cleric, notorious for his role as in the 1988 mass executions of political prisoners—has overseen a toughening of the enforcement of hijab guidelines by the morality police.

The protests are being fuelled by a rapidly deteriorating economic crisis, produced above all by the devastating impact of a brutal sanctions regime enforced by the imperialist powers that is tantamount to war. The Iranian currency dropped to its lowest-ever level against the dollar during the summer, and inflation is running at over 40 percent. Iran’s oil exports have plummeted, slashing the country’s most important source of income.

In a report published earlier this month, UN special rapporteur Alena Douhan painted a devastating picture of the impact of decades of US-led sanctions on the country of 80 million people and called for their immediate abandonment. Douhan noted that even though medication and food are supposed to be excluded from these sanctions, licences provided by US authorities to ensure exemptions “appear to be ineffective and nearly non-existent.” She continued, “These constitute serious impediments to the enjoyment of the right to the highest attainable standard of health by all Iranians.”

Under the George W. Bush and Obama administrations, Washington, in concert with its European allies, dramatically intensified the campaign of economic sanctions it has waged against Iran since the blood-soaked regime of the US-sponsored Shah Reza Phalevi was toppled by a mass popular uprising in 1979. The sanctions, which were coupled by threats of war (“all options are on the table”), were part of a bipartisan US push to bring about “regime change” or at least exploit the cleavages in the clerical establishment to bring Tehran more directly under Western domination.

Under the 2015, Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), the Obama administration agreed to relax the punishing economic sanctions in exchange for Tehran accepting that its civil nuclear program be subject to sweeping and unprecedented restrictions and international surveillance.

Tehran, which has always maintained that its nuclear programme is for civilian purposes only, complied with the terms of the agreement to the letter.

However, Washington refused to fulfil its obligations under the deal. Instead, under Trump it repudiated the Iran nuclear accord in May 2018; then, as part of a “maximum pressure” campaign, launched all-out economic war against Iran and threatened retaliatory measures against any country that did not abide by its illegal sanctions.

Although the European imperialist powers made empty pledges to oppose Trump’s provocative move and offer Tehran alternative trading and financial options to remain linked to the world market, these promises remained a dead letter. Concerned far more with protecting their lucrative business interests and frayed geostrategic relations with the US than maintaining ties with Iran and upholding international law, European companies withdrew from Iran en masse and the European powers fell into line.

Picking up where Trump left off, the Biden administration has continued to ratchet up pressure on Iran, including with provocative military threats and actions and by introducing ever more preconditions for a promised revival of the nuclear accord. Biden has also cultivated an anti-Iran alliance of the Gulf States and Israel, which has been given a free hand by Washington to step up its aggressive air strikes against Iranian targets in Syria.

In light of this record, the sheer hypocrisy of the imperialist powers’ sudden concern for the “rights” of the Iranian people in the wake of Amini’s death is breathtaking. During his speech to the United Nations General Assembly Wednesday, Biden declared, “Today, we stand with the brave citizens and the brave women of Iran who right now are demonstrating to secure their basic rights.” Secretary of State Antony Blinken attacked Tehran for “violently suppressing peaceful protesters,” as he unveiled an exception to the US sanctions to allow internet software companies to provide technology to the Iranian market with the aim of circumventing state restrictions on the internet. German Chancellor Olaf Scholz chimed in, writing on Twitter, “It’s terrible that Mahsa Amini died in police custody in Tehran. Wherever it is in the world, women must have the right to live as they please without having to fear for their lives.”

On cue, the same media outlets that have spent the past seven months belching out pro-war propaganda to legitimise the US-NATO war on Russia, which has led to the deaths of tens of thousands on both sides, suddenly discovered their sympathy for the “human rights” of Iranians. The New York Times, Britain’s Guardian, Germany’s Der Spiegel, and others have pumped out column after column of moralising drivel, denouncing the regime in Tehran, and proclaiming support for the “rights” and “freedom” of the Iranian people.

None of these people or publications have been troubled by the hundreds of thousands of entirely preventable COVID-19 deaths in Iran, a large portion of which must be put down to the malicious exclusion of Iran from access to health care technology and medication under the US-led sanctions regime. The US and its European allies are also fully complicit in the barbarous war waged by Saudi dictator Mohamed bin Salman against Iranian-backed Hauthi rebels in the impoverished country of Yemen, where tens of thousands of civilians have died since 2015 and millions have fled their homes.

The glaring double standard is to be explained, as always when it comes to the political establishment and the bourgeois media, by definite imperialist interests. Washington, Berlin, and the other major powers view the protests over Amini’s death as a useful stick to beat the Tehran regime into making concessions in the largely stalled talks aimed at renewing the nuclear accord. The failure to reach an agreement thus far is entirely the fault of the imperialists, who have engineered one provocation after another against Tehran. In June, the US and its European allies collaborated to adopt a resolution at the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) over the objections of Russia and China, and with India and Pakistan abstaining, that accused Iran of not complying with IAEA inspectors. Biden has also refused to remove the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps from the US list of terrorist organizations, a key Tehran demand, although it now appears to have dropped it to no avail.

On September 7, the IAEA provocatively asserted that it is “not in a position to provide assurance that Iran’s nuclear program is exclusively peaceful.” As a matter of fact, the US has admitted that there is no evidence of Iran having any kind of nuclear weapons programme since 2003, as admitted by current CIA director William Burns.

Beyond the nuclear talks, the imperialist powers are determined to intensify pressure on Iran’s bourgeois-clerical regime as it deepens its partnerships with Russia and China in Central Asia. At the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation meeting in Uzbekistan earlier this month, Iran signed a memorandum of obligations to become a full member of the security and trade bloc led by Beijing and Moscow. Iranian Foreign Minister Hossein Amir Abdullahian said the move marked “a new stage of various economic, commercial, transit and energy cooperation.”

Separate agreements were signed with Uzbekistan to expand trading relations. In August, Tehran announced a new railway project with Kazakhstan aimed at boosting trading relations in Central Asia and pledged that it would from now on trade with Russia in their own currencies rather than in US dollars.

Raisi speaks for the hardline faction of the clerical establishment, which was never fully reconciled to the efforts of former president Hassan Rouhani and the so-called “reform” wing to reach an accommodation with US and European imperialism through the nuclear accord. During a meeting with Russian president Vladimir Putin on the sidelines of the SCO conference, Raisi said of Iran’s SCO membership, “The relationship between countries which are sanctioned by the US, such as Iran, Russia or other countries, can overcome many problems and issues and make them stronger. The Americans think whichever country they impose sanctions on, it will be stopped, their perception is a wrong one.”

While it doubles down on waging war with Russia in Ukraine, even at the risk of triggering a catastrophic nuclear conflagration, US imperialism is also plotting a major intensification of hostilities in the Middle East. Biden’s trip to the region in July, where he visited Israel and Saudi Arabia, was aimed at consolidating Washington’s anti-Iran alliance between Tel Aviv and the Gulf sheikdoms. Iran’s bourgeois-clerical regime, sitting atop a social powder keg, has nothing to offer in opposition to the imperialist provocations other than a closer alliance with Russia’s capitalist oligarchy, which oscillates between appeals to the imperialists for a place at the table and blood-curdling threats of nuclear Armageddon. The only way out of this blind alley is for Iranian workers to unify their struggles with the working class throughout the Middle East and internationally on the basis of a socialist and internationalist programme.

MUSSOLINI'S SPIRITUAL HEIR
Italy's Meloni declares victory, claims leadership for next government



This is a night of pride for the Brothers of Italy but it's a starting point and the situation is difficult and needs contribution from everyone, Meloni said.
Leader of Brothers of Italy Giorgia Meloni gestures at the party's 
election night headquarters, in Rome, Italy. September 26, 2022. (Reuters)

Italian right-wing leader Giorgia Meloni, whose party came out on top in general elections, said she would seek to lead the next government and would work for all Italians.

"Italians have sent a clear message in favour of a center-right government led by Brothers of Italy," she told reporters in Rome on early Monday, adding that "we will do it for all" Italians.

She said that the night is a pride for the Brothers of Italy but it's a starting point not a finishing line.

"Situation is difficult and needs contribution from everyone," Meloni said.

"If we are called upon to govern this nation, we will do so for all Italians, with the aim of uniting the people, of exalting what unites them rather than what divides them," Meloni told reporters. "We will not betray your trust."

Meloni's Brothers of Italy party came out on top in Italian elections on Sunday, according to the first exit polls, putting her eurosceptic populists on course to take power.

The party won between 22 percent and 26 percent of the vote, according to national broadcaster RAI.

A right-wing coalition with her allies, Matteo Salvini's right-wing League and former prime minister Silvio Berlusconi's Forza Italia, was expected to win a clear majority in both houses of parliament.

The result must still be confirmed but risks fresh trouble for the European Union, just weeks after the right wing outperformed in elections in Sweden.




Democratic Party concedes defeat


Italy's main centre-left group, the Democratic Party (PD), conceded defeat early Monday in a national election and said it would be the largest opposition force in the next parliament.

"This is a sad evening for the country," Debora Serracchiani, a senior PD lawmaker, told reporters in the party's first official comment on the result. "(The right) has the majority in parliament, but not in the country."

Provisional results showed that a right-wing alliance led by Giorgia Meloni's Brothers of Italy party had won around 43% of the vote and was on course for a clear majority in parliament.

Meloni, who campaigned on a motto of "God, country and family", has abandoned her calls for one of Europe's biggest economies to leave the eurozone, but says Rome must assert its interests more in Brussels.

But the self-declared "Christian mother" — whose experience of government has been limited to a stint as a minister in Berlusconi's 2008 government — has huge challenges ahead.

Like much of Europe, Italy is suffering rampant inflation while an energy crisis looms this winter, linked to the conflict in Ukraine.

The Italian economy, the third largest in the eurozone, is also saddled with a debt worth 150 percent of gross domestic product.

READ MORE: Five things to know about Giorgia Meloni - frontrunner in Italian election



Turnout is expected to be lower than in the 2018 elections.

Meloni had been leading opinion polls since Prime Minister Mario Draghi called snap elections in July following the collapse of his national unity government.

Hers was the only party not to join Draghi's coalition when, in February 2021, the former European Central Bank chief was parachuted in to lead a country still reeling from the coronavirus pandemic.

For many voters, Meloni was "the novelty, the only leader the Italians have not yet tried", Wolfango Piccoli of the Teneo consultancy told AFP news agency before the election.

READ MORE: Italy's undecideds: Can they reverse far-right's electoral gains on Sunday?



Tory government stands accused of launching a full-scale assault on nature


Nature-focused organization's have accused the Conservative government of launching “an attack on nature”. Their criticism centres around the government’s plans to both rip up and relax rules that safeguard the natural world. The UK is already one of the most nature-depleted countries in the entire world.

Revelations on 24 September have further raised fears of an all-out assault on the living world. According to the Observer, the government is poised to potentially axe a plan that would have made farming more nature-friendly. Agriculture is the main driver of the extinction crisis. It’s also a major contributor to the climate crisis – particularly animal agriculture.

Nowhere will be safe

The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) posted a lengthy Twitter thread on 23 September outlining its concerns.

The organisation highlighted that Kwasi Kwarteng’s mini-budget contained plans to create new so-called investment zones in 38 areas of England. According to the government, these zones will have “liberalised planning rules” and “reforms” aimed at speedy development, including on land that is currently out of bounds.

RSPB England created a map that showed the areas currently protected for nature within these zones. This indicates how many nature sites are at risk from the plan:

The organisation said that “nowhere will be safe” if the plans go ahead.

Prior to the mini-budget, the government also brought the retained EU law revocation and reform bill before parliament. The business secretary Jacob Rees-Mogg explained the bill’s intention:


The bill will sunset the majority of retained EU law so that it expires on 31 December 2023. All retained EU law contained in domestic secondary legislation and retained direct EU legislation will expire on this date, unless otherwise preserved.

There are 570 environmental laws among the retained EU laws that are now on the chopping block, according to the Guardian.

In a blog post on the government’s plans, the RSPB highlighted that nature in the UK has been declining for decades. It warned:

The laws that are now under attack were introduced to protect what we had left. Without them nature would be in even worse trouble. They’ve given us hope that some of our rarest and most vulnerable wildlife can still recover.
Attack on nature intensified

The outlook for wildlife recovery in England reduced further still on 24 September. The Observer reported that the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) is considering regressing on farming subsidy payments. Until recently, the government planned to start paying farmers for adopting more nature-friendly practices. This system, based on a ‘public money for public goods‘ principle, would replace the longstanding regime of giving taxpayers’ money to farmers based on how much land they farm.

The DEFRA sources told the Observer that the new system is now under review. And the department is considering regressing to a regime much more in line with the old pay-per-area system.

In response to RSPB’s Twitter thread, DEFRA defended the government’s actions:

Meanwhile, a Treasury spokesperson insisted:

The Government remains committed to setting a new legally binding target to halt the decline of biodiversity in England by 2030.

Despite the government’s protestations, its plans represent a real threat to nature. Last year, researchers warned that the UK has already lost so much biodiversity that it risks an “ecological meltdown”, ITV reported. This government’s proposals are the last thing we need.







The world is bigger than two
Jung Gi-woong
The author is vice head of HK+ National Strategies Research Project Agency, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies.

September 25, 2022

We live in a world that urgently needs international cooperation more than ever. The global problems — including climate change, carbon neutrality, low birthrate, aging, food, energy, and other imminent problems — call for international cooperation. But unfortunately, global society’s effort is short of our expectations. Also, the role of the United Nations does not meet our needs, which raises the need for UN Security Council reform.

Since the end of the Cold War, we have witnessed the heydays of multilateralism and international cooperation. We believed that we could achieve a flat world through globalization, make transnational communication, and lead to a better world based on the goodwill of humankind and international cooperation. Unfortunately, we have again brought geopolitics, nationalism and unilateralism based on national interests over the past.

Against this backdrop, just before the Chuseok holiday, the Directorate of Communications under the Presidency of the Republic of Türkiye held a meaningful meeting in Seoul titled “The United Nations Security Council Reform: A New Approach to Reconstructing the International Order.” Experts in international relations from Korea and Türkiye met to discuss the importance of international cooperation and the power of multilateralism.

Regarding the world’s power distribution now, we might agree with Türkiye’s motto, “The world is bigger than five.” To paraphrase the motto with his understanding of the current world, it could be “The world is bigger than two.” The two can be interpreted with two different meanings.

‘The first two’ means the world comprised of only two groups: powerful and vulnerable countries. For example, the world before the collapse of the Cold War was divided into two groups: strong and weak countries.

After the end of the Cold War, the middle group emerged — in other words, not powerful but not weak countries appeared who can check the unilateral initiatives of strong countries regarding the global order. Korea and Türkiye might be categorized as middle countries. As all of us remember, their efforts to make their voices heard worldwide led to the creation of Mikta (Mexico, Indonesia, Korea, Turkey and Australia).

‘The second two’ refers to America and China, who believe they are making the rules of the world. The G2 competes not only for global hegemony but also presses other countries to take their side. Most of us would not welcome this choice.

That is why we must consider the need for UN Security Council reform and multilateralism. Nobody wants the world governed by a few powerful countries or just by the two.

No one would deny the merit of multilateralism. But the current Security Council system goes directly against multilateral cooperation. Only the privileged enjoy the privileges. Why only the Big 5? Isn’t it possible for other countries to join? Did they forget how the G20 was born?

The G2 or G5 could be acknowledging the need for multilateral cooperation. But the problem is that they use the word ‘multilateralism’ in their own way. When the U.S. says multilateralism, it means collaboration among countries that agree with the U.S. intention and share U.S. values. When China says multilateralism, it means a relatively loose coalition of countries that do not abide by strict rules so long as China is just a member of the multilateral group. But as soon as it becomes a group leader, it presses other countries to stand by it. Put it simply, the G2 wants to control the global order as they want. How can we solve this dilemma and make the world more cooperative? How can we make the voices of small and middle countries heard in the process of global rule setting?

The UN Security Council reform can be the starting point. Simple change is not enough. What we need is a drastic transformation of the system through fundamental reform. The process of reform should be based on universal values. Appreciation of human rights, respecting and caring for the weak, and helping those in danger belong to the universal value category.

The power of culture can be emphasized in this shift. Cultural power, or soft power, have sometimes been used as an instrument to get support from other countries. But unilateral sending of foreign culture always meets unexpected backlashes. We must use culture discreetly so that it can serve as a catalyst to widen our exchanges. We must remember that we all are under the big umbrella of global civilization.

Korea has never been a hegemonic power in its long history. Though the country maintained a unified government for a long time, it has been invaded over 900 times. Even today, Korea is pressed to take side with G2.

Considering its population, economic size and technological level, it is not easy to call Korea a weak country now. Shortly after the end of the Korean War, the country was weak. But Korea has made strides over the past decades. Despite its remarkable growth, however, the country’s presence is not felt strong due to its geopolitical location in Northeast Asia. But that cannot hinder the Korean people’s will to cooperate and love peace.

Even though Korea experienced incessant foreign invasions, Koreans have never invaded other countries. The founding principle of the peace-loving country is Hong-ik-in-gan, which means “Give benefits widely to humankind.” The spirit borders on humanitarianism. Another founding principle of the country is Gyeong-cheon-ae-in, which means “Respect heaven and love people.” The beginning of the UN Security Council reform should be based on the love of people and humanitarianism. By doing so, we can create a world where all members cooperate to make a better world. The world is bigger than two.
Z-SCAM
Wildlife trade protections trashed by for-profit Asian zoos

Elephants perform at Elephant Valley in Yunnan Province, China 
(Photo: Francis Garrard)

By Don Pinnock
25 Sep 2022 

The protection of critically endangered wild animals is being undermined as Asian zoos force them to perform for profit in violation of CITES regulations.

By the transposition of one letter for another in the permit code of the United Nations wildlife trade organisation CITES – Z for zoo instead of T for Commercial – critically endangered wild animals become tradeable for huge sums of money. It’s a loophole so big that the very intention of CITES is being systematically undermined.

The Oxford dictionary defines a zoo as a place where many kinds of wild animals are kept for public exhibition and where they are studied, bred and protected.

This is the spirit of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) and upon which the agreement to permit sales of certain listed species of endangered wild animals to zoos was based.

It very specifically forbids transactions in Appendix 1-listed species “for primarily commercial purposes” – and for good reason. If zoos were permitted to buy and sell wild animals commercially, it would negate the entire purpose of the CITES Appendix 1 classification.

What the original drafters of that protocol could not have imagined was how certain zoos would morph into massive, money-driven tourist enterprises. Because of its cumbersome bureaucracy (change requires the consensus of 178 countries) CITES has been unable to plug a massive loophole that is ripping into the biodiversity of endangered wild creatures and warping the integrity of countries from which they come.

There’s a further problem. In CITES regulations there’s no definition of a zoo. Trade to zoos is happening under a loose and generous belief that all zoos must be for conservation and education.

Chimps in a Chinese zoo. (Image: EMS Foundation)

In practice it doesn’t seem to matter if the zoo in question is unable to provide any conservation benefits or even meet minimal welfare requirements, nor does it matter if the trade to this so-called zoo has huge commercial value.

Read more in Daily Maverick: “CITES silent as Zimbabwe dooms elephants to living hell in China

Countless examples unearthed by wildlife investigator Karl Ammann have shown that by simply proclaiming the transaction to be for zoo purposes, a commercial enterprise and transaction is able to escape from CITES’ most fundamental safeguard.
Protections

Appendix 1 is the highest CITES protection and covers wild-caught animals. It requires that their removal does not endanger the survival of the species, that their capture violated no national laws and that they may not be used for primarily commercial purposes.

Ammann has been ranging across China, Laos, Georgia and Pakistan documenting the types of zoos where wild-caught animals, mostly from Africa, are ending up and the conditions under which they’re kept.

What he found was shocking, with high levels of cruelty and almost zero public education. The sole reason for the animals there was to make money, in some cases eye-watering amounts. Almost all the CITES Appendix 1 safeguards are being ignored. All that seems to be needed is to put a Z (for zoo) on import and export permits.
Elephants perform at Guizhou Forest Wildlife Zoo. (Image: EMS Foundation)

According to his report, published by the EMS Foundation, “time and time again commercial operations have been able to import critically endangered Appendix I species by claiming to be a zoo. These facilities are often commercial enterprises, often using animals for entertainment shows and exchanging significant sums of money in doing so.”

Zoo visits


Ammann discovered that the Xishuangbanna Wild Elephant Valley (Jinghong, China) imported 11 wild elephants from Laos and forced them to perform. The “zoo” attracts about 40,000 visitors on weekends, earning more than $2-million.

The Guizhou Forest Wildlife Zoo (Guiyang, China) imported 12 elephants in 2017. There are only nine left, according to the keepers. It is suspected that the other three elephants have been resold.

Keepers at the facility confirmed that they buy elephants from a wildlife dealer, a Mr Zhang, for about$350,000 for an adult (more for an infant). Video footage shows a performance arena with football nets and various other performing props for elephant shows.

Not a single final destination of any of the animals imported from South Africa by Golden Land Animal Trade Co Ltd is known.

Guizhou has an elephant training centre where some elephants are understood to be trained for performances before being moved onto other zoo facilities in China.

In 2019, Longemont Safari Park (Huzhou, Zhejiang, China) imported eight wild elephants from Laos which were trained at Guizhou and are used for performances.

Ammann discovered that the facility, which was opened recently, expects about 30,000 visitors a day, with an expected average $40 entry fee per person, and is guaranteed to generate millions of dollars.

Read more in Daily Maverick: “Zimbabwe: Selling elephants to questionable Chinese destinations damages country’s tourism, say critics

In 2019, Longemont imported 32 African elephants, of which 20 were kept and trained there while 12 were moved to another safari park. Ammann was told the purchase price for these elephants was $125,000 each.

In two months this year, according to its website, it attracted three million tourists, netting R1.7-billion.

Elephants perform at Longemont Safari Park in China. 
(Image: Supplied)

Beijing Wildlife Park, which imported four elephants from Laos and 18 chimps from South Africa, is registered as a company with an annual turnover of about $7-million. According to Ammann “its activities are primarily commercial and involve poor treatment of Appendix I elephants in order to generate profit. In accordance with the protections under CITES, import permits should not have been granted.”

The chimps were imported under the Z code and source code C, which means captive bred. There is, however, no evidence that they were conceived in a captive facility in South Africa and were therefore Appendix 1. The chimps, says Ammann, are clearly a key attraction for Beijing Wildlife Park, with the objective of bringing more paying visitors through the door.

Green World Breeding Farm (China) belongs to a Chinese brokering company, Golden Land Animal Trade, which imports animals, sometimes on behalf of other businesses and sometimes to sell off to Chinese and other international zoos. Green World is itself not a zoo.

Visit Daily Maverick’s home page for more news, analysis and investigations

Golden Land was implicated in the smuggling of 138 chimpanzees from Guinea to China between 2007 and 2012. It is also named as one of the biggest of three animal wholesale companies in China that acts as an intermediary for traffickers and final buyers.

This company, says Ammann, boasts about importing most of the wild animals into China. It claims on its website to have imported a number of rare specimens, including elephants and chimps, for more than 100 zoos and aquariums in China in the past 10 years. “Not a single final destination of any of the animals imported from South Africa by Golden Land Animal Trade Co Ltd is known,” says Ammann.
Performing elephants at Elephant Valley in Yunnan Province. 
(Photo: Francis Garrard)
Elephants are forced to perform at Elephant Valley.
 (Photo: Francis Garrard)

In Pakistan, the secretary of forests and wildlife, Shahid Zaman, said that “surplus” animals at Lahore Zoo would be distributed across 21 wildlife parks and zoos in Punjab for breeding or auctioned to the public. The latter clearly has no conservation value.

Read more in Daily Maverick: “North West trophy hunting, the ghost and the dodgy deal – how Namibian tuskers got to Middle East zoos

At Zootopia in Georgia, Appendix 1 tamarins and lemurs were imported from Mystic Monkeys & Feathers in South Africa under the Z code but were being kept in a shopping mall with no natural light.

The EMS report proposed a draft resolution to the forthcoming CITES convention, calling on it to frame a clear definition of the term “zoo” and to clarify commercial and non-commercial activities.

A Longemont Safari Park show. (Image: Karl Ammann)

General principles, it says, should include a clear prohibition of Appendix 1 species being given a Z code if their purpose is primarily commercial. An activity should only be described as “zoological” if it wishes to effectively breed and conserve a species and educate the public on that species.

“Purpose code Z must not be used unless the specimen is kept in a suitable environment for its species and cared for using best practice husbandry.”

The head of CITES legal affairs and compliance, Sophie Hensborg, was approached for comment on this story but, by time of publication, no response had been received. DM/OBP

ICYMI😱

Canada girds for long haul after historic storm Fiona ravages east coast

25 September 2022 - 12:27BY JOHN MORRS























A fallen tree lies on a house following the passing of Hurricane Fiona, later downgraded to a post-tropical storm, in Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada September 24, 2022.
Image: REUTERS/Ted Pritchard

After powerful storm Fiona left a trail of destruction in Canada's east coast on Saturday, the focus shifted to huge cleanup efforts, damage assessment and restoration of power and telecom services as officials warned of a long road to recovery.

The historic storm slammed into eastern Canada with hurricane-force winds, forcing evacuations, uprooting trees and power lines, and reducing many homes to “just a pile of rubble.”

The Canadian Hurricane Centre estimated that Fiona was the lowest pressured land falling storm on record in Canada

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said Canadian armed forces will be deployed to help with the cleanup, adding that Fiona caused significant damage and recovery will require a big effort.

Despite the intensity of the storm, there were no serious injuries or deaths, which government officials said was a result of residents paying heed to the repeated warnings.

Still, thousands of residents across Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island (PEI) and Newfoundland were without power and dealing with patchy telecom connections, and government officials pleaded with residents for patience.

They warned that in some cases it would take weeks before essential services are fully restored.

“We do know that the damage is very extensive, quite likely the worst we have ever seen,” Dennis King, PEI premier, told reporters on Saturday.

“Islanders ... should know that our road to recovery will be weeks or longer. It will be an all-hands on deck approach,” he added.

Several university students lined up for food outside convenience stores powered by generators due to the power outage caused by Fiona. The Canadian Red Cross has launched a fund raising drive to support the affected people.

Government officials said the full-scale of the destruction will only be known in the coming days and weeks. But with the storm packing gusts of up to 170km/hour sweeping away homes, bridges and roads, Fiona was reminiscent of the damage caused by other storms, including Hurricane Dorian in 2019, which is estimated to have had an insurance bill of C$105 million.

Premiers of the affected provinces told the federal government they need long-term support around public and critical infrastructure after the storm tore off roofs of schools and community centres, as well as quick relief to businesses and families to get on with normal life quickly.

The storm also severely damaged fishing harbours in Atlantic Canada, which could hurt the country's C$3.2 billion lobster industry, unless it is fully restored before the season kicks off in few weeks.

“Those fishers have a very immediate need to be able to access their livelihood once the storm passes,” Dominic LeBlanc, Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs of Canada, said on Saturday.

“So this is exactly the kind of work that will accompany provincial authorities in the coming weeks and months,” he added

'Total devastation': Newfoundland town is DESTROYED by Fiona as homes are swept out to sea, roads are washed away and 471,000 are left without power - but no deaths are reported


No deaths have been confirmed, but hundreds of Canadians have been displaced and homes were destroyed by the storm surge

One woman was nearly swept out to sea when her home in Port Aux Basques collapsed, but neighbors were able to save her

The center of the storm, now called Post-Tropical Cyclone Fiona, was crossing northeasterly across Newfoundland and Labrador with high winds and heavy rains

The storm had weakened somewhat as it travelled north. As of 6 p.m., the storm was about 80 northwest of Port Aux Basques, where the town was devastated

Nearly half a million people were without power in Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island and Newfoundland, utility companies said


By STEPHEN LEPORE and REUTERS and JANON FISHER FOR DAILYMAIL.COM

PUBLISHED:25 September 2022 

Devastating storm Fiona threw nearly half a million Canadians into darkness, uprooted trees, swept away roads and destroyed the pretty Newfoundland town of Port Aux Basques after it slammed into eastern part of the country on Saturday.

Post-Tropical Cyclone Fiona, as it is now called after being downgraded by the National Hurricane Center, punished the coastal towns of Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island New Brunswick and Newfoundland with winds of more than 80mph, which knocked out power to 470,000 households.

'We're seeing devastating images come out of Port aux Basques,' Prime Minister Justin Trudeau told the press. 'PEI (Prince Edward Island) has experienced storm damage like they've never seen. Cape Breton is being hit hard, too, as is Quebec.'



As many as 20 homes are believed to be destroyed, like this one, caused by the storm surge by Post-Tropical Storm Fiona


Port Aux Basques, the southernmost tip of Newfoundland, was devastated by the storm


The banner for A&W restaurant was torn from its place during the high winds, estimated to top 80 mph


Post-Tropical Storm Fiona knocked out power to nearly half a million Canadians as it swept through Nova Scotia, Newfoundland and Labrador and Prince Edward Island

+56
View gallery


Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau canceled a trip to Japan to oversee the recovery effort

Storm Fiona sends homes floating away as it floods eastern Canada

The weather front will continue to push across Newfoundland and Labrador toward Greenland where it's forecast to peter out by Monday.

But that's too late for the town of Port Aux Basques on the southwestern tip of Newfoundland.

'What's actually happening here is total devastation,' Mayor Brian Button told the CBC. 'This has become bigger, and worse than we had imagined.'

Six-foot storm surges crushed homes and carried them out to sea before the tide shifted, leaving a debris and ruin in its wake.

The mayor said that he ordered an evacuation of all homes on the coast.

'I'm telling you, it is a mess out there,' he told the news outlet.

One woman was nearly carried out to sea after her coastal home collapsed in the swell, according to Jolene Garland, spokeswoman for the Royal Canadian Mounted Police.

There was a report of a second woman who may not have been so lucky, but police were unable to get to her home because conditions were too dangerous.

Neighbors were able to grab her and pull her to safety. She suffered minor injuries and was treated at the local hospital, according to the Wall Street Journal.

Garland described extreme weather conditions along the southwest coast of Newfoundland that included 'high winds, high waves, flooding and electrical fires.' Multiple structures have been destroyed by high seas, she said

The Royal Canadian Police said the town of 4,000 is in a state of emergency as authorities deal with multiple electrical fires and residential flooding.

'I´m seeing homes in the ocean. I'm seeing rubble floating all over the place. It's complete and utter destruction. There's an apartment that is gone, that is literally just rubble,' said René J. Roy, a resident of Channel-Port Aux Basques and chief editor at Wreckhouse Press, said in a phone interview.

Roy estimated between eight to 12 houses and buildings have washed into the sea. 'It's quite terrifying,' he said.

Further inland in Burgeo-La Polie, the local assemblyman said that the destruction came quickly.

'Over 20 homes damaged or destroyed,' Andrew Parsons, a member of the House of Assembly, told the CBC. 'Again, some of these are extremely close friends, people I've known my entire life. Just a flick, just seconds, they lose something that they've worked at.'

Hundreds are believed to be displaced by the storm surge, which knocked out roads making relief efforts more frustrating.

Nova Scotia Power CEO Peter Gregg told NBC News that it would take at least three days to restore power.



Michael King, special advisor to Newfoundland and Labrador Premier Andrew Furey, and his family, posted a photo that shows damaged caused by post-tropical storm Fiona on the Burnt Islands


Some sort of structure appears to have floated away due to the effects of the post-tropical storm


Fallen trees lean against a house in Sydney as post tropical storm Fiona continues to batter the Maritimes on Saturday


Powerful storm Fiona slammed into eastern Canada on Saturday with hurricane-force winds, nearly a week after devastating parts of the Caribbean as hundreds of thousands are without power, including some in Charlottetown on Prince Edward Island

Sparks rain down through trees as Storm Fiona slams eastern Canada

The storm had weakened somewhat as it travelled north. As of 5 a.m., the storm was about 160 miles northeast of Halifax, carrying maximum winds of 90 miles per hour and barreling north at around 26 mph, the NHC said.

Hurricane-force winds extended up to 175 miles out from Fiona's center while tropical-storm-force winds reached up to 405 miles out as of 8 a.m. ET, according to the NHC.

The Canadian Hurricane Center called the storm 'the lowest pressured land falling storm on record in Canada.' Lower pressure systems cause more intense storms, providing lift and moisture in the atmosphere to fuel showers and thunderstorms.

The 931.6 mb measurement would be not only a Canadian record but the lowest pressure ever observed in either Canada or the US for any storm north of the Gulf Coast, according to Yale Climate Connections.

The pressure is similar to what is usually expected with a Category 4 hurricane but it's only a tropical storm because of the wide differential in pressure across the storm.

Hurricanes in Canada are somewhat rare, in part because once the storms reach colder waters, they lose their main source of energy. But post-tropical cyclones still can have hurricane-strength winds, although they have a cold core and no visible eye. They also often lose their symmetric form and more resemble a comma.

AS USUAL THE DAILY MAIL IS THE BEST SOURCE FOR TWEETS, VIDEO'S AND A TOTAL OF 56 PHOTOS.

Though Lauded Abroad, Japan’s Abe Leaves Complicated Legacy at Home

September 25, 2022
William Gallo
Protesters attend a rally against Japan's state funeral
 for former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe that will be held
 next Tuesday in Tokyo, Japan, Sept. 25, 2022.

TOKYO —

Hundreds of foreign dignitaries are expected to attend Tuesday’s state funeral for former Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, a reflection of his broad popularity overseas. But Abe, who was assassinated in July, leaves a more divided legacy at home.

Abe, Japan’s longest-serving prime minister, won respect, especially among right-leaning nationalists, for making his country stronger amid increasing threats from China and North Korea. He also brought relative stability, ending a six-year period during which Japan averaged a new prime minister every year.
Shinzo Abe speaks during a press conference at the
 prime minister's official residence in Tokyo, on Sept. 25, 2017.

Abe’s conservative policies also angered many Japanese, though, who say he brought the country closer to war – something unimaginable for a country with a technically pacifist defense architecture. While his signature “Abenomics” strategy was ambitious, it ultimately failed to spark higher growth.

Abe’s mixed legacy helps explain the public backlash against his state funeral. Polls show a large majority of Japanese oppose the idea of holding a state funeral, which is usually reserved for the emperor and his family. Many say the event will be too expensive. The government projects the funeral will cost $12 million, much higher than an earlier estimate.

“It doesn’t matter whether he served a long time or not,” said Mario Ito, a Tokyo resident walking outside the central Shibuya train station on Sunday.

“Seventy percent of Japanese people are opposed to doing this – the fact they’re going ahead with it shows the government isn’t working properly,” he said.

“I really admire his legacy,” said Ms. Sasaki, another Tokyo resident. “But I don’t think there’s a need to spend this much money to hold a huge state funeral,” said a woman who would only provide her last name.

Though Abe’s rule was long-lasting, his popularity had declined by the time he left office, said Jeffrey J. Hall, a Japanese politics specialist at the Kanda University of International Studies.

“As a prime minister he was successful in winning elections with his party again and again. But those elections had quite a low turnout. So even though he was winning, elections didn't mean that he was a very, very popular politician or loved by the people,” Hall said.

Part of the current backlash to Abe has to do with the ruling party’s ties to the controversial, South Korea-based Unification Church. Abe’s suspected killer said the group took excessive donations from his mother, leaving her impoverished. He accused Abe of supporting the church.

Abe’s party, the ruling Liberal Democratic Party of Japan, earlier this month revealed that at least 179 of its lawmakers had connections to the Unification Church, which some of its former members see as a cult.

“You can't really separate this funeral and Abe's legacy from the Unification Church scandal, because as the party is revealed to have more and more ties to this church, most of these people were close associates of Abe, many of them within his own faction of the party,” said Hall.

It has created a tricky situation for Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida, an Abe protege. His approval rating has sunk to new lows. However, the fallout may be limited, since the party doesn’t face any major national elections until 2025.

Abe’s state funeral will be held Tuesday at Tokyo’s Nippon Budokan Hall. Over 190 foreign delegations are expected to attend. It will serve as an occasion for world leaders to say goodbye to one of the 21st century's most influential leaders.

The U.S. delegation will be led by U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris. Asked about Japanese criticism of Abe’s funeral, a senior U.S. official said he is “not going to comment on any internal Japanese attitudes.”

“All I can say from our point of view is that Prime Minister Abe was a great friend of the United States,” the U.S. official said. “He was a great leader for Japan.”