Thursday, October 27, 2022

UPDATED
‘This is a revolution’: On potent 40th day after Mahsa Amini’s death, protests erupt across Iran

Security forces open fire as Iranians protest in huge numbers on symbolic 40th day since death of 22-year-old

Borzou Daragahi
International Correspondent

Thousands flock to hometown of Mahsa Amini to commemorate 40 days since her death


Tens of thousands of Iranians across the country defied phalanxes of security forces to march and protest against the clerical regime on Wednesday, the religiously potent and politically symbolic 40th day since the death of Mahsa Amini while in the custody of the morality police.

In the central Iranian city of Shiraz, at least 15 people were killed in unclear circumstances after gunmen attacked a shrine, according to state media. Two alleged “terrorists” were arrested and another was being pursued, according to other reports.

The weeks-long movement born of Amini’s death is rooted in opposition to Islamic social rules and led by mostly secular Iranians, and among observers and activists, there were doubts as to whether they would take to the 40th day mourning tradition rooted in faith

But opponents to the regime embraced the day enthusiastically.


Mostly Iranian Kurds living in or near Amini’s western Iranian hometown of Saqez in western Iran could be seen walking for miles along highways and across fields to get to her burial spot after regime forces shut down or restricted vehicular traffic and menaced residents with gunfire since Tuesday night.

Video showed a massive crowd gathered in front of the governor’s office in Saqez.

“Don’t be afraid, don’t be afraid, we are all together,” they chanted.

Protests broke out on university campuses across the country, including in Tehran, the capital, Mashhad, Tabriz, Hamadan, and at high schools among teenagers walking home from classes.

A woman standing on top of a vehicle as thousands make their way towards Aichi cemetery in Saqez, Mahsa Amini’s hometown in the western Iranian province of Kurdistan, to mark 40 days since her death
(UGC/AFP via Getty Images)

“Basijis get lost! Basijis get lost!” women at al-Zahra University could be seen chanting, referring to the Basij paramilitaries terrorising Iranian protesters, as they confronted officials trying to bar their movement.

Doctors and dentists, marking Amini’s passing and as well as voicing anger over a detained fellow medical professional, poured into streets of Tehran, before they were chased away by regime enforcers firing teargas or shotgun rounds, according to video posted online. A shopping mall on central Tehran’s Vali Asr Square was flooded with young protesters, as was the traditional Grand Bazaar that was once the seat of commercial power.

“Freedom, freedom, freedom!” they chanted, according to a video posted online.

Even in the computer bazaar of Tehran, filled with Iranian yuppies who listen to western music and download the latest apps, tech workers in black beat their chests in a mourning ritual.

“We will kill, we will kill, he who killed our sister,” they chanted.


People march down the highway toward the Aychi Cemetery

(VIDEO OBTAINED BY REUTERS)

The country was also hit by labour actions. Workers at a refinery in Tehran went on strike, as did shopkeepers in commercial districts in many cities, including Tehran, Shiraz and Arak. Workers at the Tabriz stock exchange also staged a work stoppage, ostensibly to protest the state of capital markets.

In the Islamic and Eastern Orthodox Christian faiths, the 40th day after a death marks the deceased’s soul passing from the earth to the afterlife. It is often marked by friends and relatives returning to the gravesite to pay their respects.

In the run-up to the 1979 revolution that led to the establishment of Tehran’s clerical regime, 40th day commemorations of dead protesters were marked by political demonstrations met by gunfire and deaths, and further protests 40 days later, in cycles that built up momentum that led to the downfall of the country’s monarchy.

Analysts predict more unrest in the coming days as protesters also mark the 40th days of Nika Shakarami and Sarina Esmailzadeh, two juvenile protesters allegedly killed by regime enforcers.

“The 40th commemoration is tradition more than religion,” said Iranian activist Sharare Mahboudi, who left Iran three years ago after coming under the scrutiny of the security forces. “From now on, Iranians will look for any excuse to protest, even if that protest is religious. And if they beat their chests in mourning and wear black, maybe the security forces will go a little easier on them.”

State broadcast media mostly ignored Wednesday’s protests even as dramatic footage of mass unrest flooded the internet and opposition satellite television channels. The front page of the website of Iran’s English-language Press TV featured stories about protests over the cost of living in France and Spain, but not a word about the unrest at home.


Iranian police arrive to disperse a protest in Tehran
(AP)

The regime has responded to the protests with calibrated violence. At least 252 protesters, including 36 juveniles, have been killed in the violence, and at least 13,533 arrested, according to Hrana, a human rights monitoring group.

The regime blames outside agitators for provoking the unrest, and has vowed to take legal action against UK-based “hostile media" for supporting terrorism. In particular, it has blamed the popular Saudi-backed Iran International television network as well as BBC Persian, as well as Manoto TV, all based in London.

“The UK and the whole empire of lies based in London are sowing chaos and staging psychological warfare” to keep the protests going, said an editorial in the Javan newspaper, which is linked to the Revolutionary Guard.

As dusk settled, trash bins in central Tehran began burning, and streets of some quarters began turning into rock battles between security forces and citizens.


People walk across a pedestrian crossing in Vali Asr square in the centre of Tehran

(AFP via Getty Images)

“This is a revolution,” said Ms Mahboudi, who is regularly in touch with protesters in Iran, including teens who defy their parents’ wishes and take to the streets daily. “Maybe it will take one or two years. Probably a lot of people will die. The regime will kill anybody. They are merciless. And they have nowhere else on the planet to go.”

Iran Protesters Rally to Mark 40 Days Since Amini’s Death

Wednesday, 26 October, 2022 - 

A member of the Iranian community living in Türkiye attends a protest in support of Iranian women and against the death of Mahsa Amini, near the Iranian consulate in Istanbul, Türkiye, October 24, 2022. (Reuters)

Asharq Al-Awsat

Hundreds of protesters poured into the streets of a northwestern Iranian city on Wednesday to mark the watershed 40 days since the death in custody of 22-year-old Mahsa Amini, whose tragedy sparked Iran's biggest anti-government movement in over a decade.

In Amini's Kurdish hometown of Saqez, the birthplace of the nationwide unrest now roiling Iran, crowds snaked through the local cemetery and thronged her grave.

"Death to the dictator!" protesters cried.

State-run media announced that schools and universities in Iran's northwestern region would close, purportedly to curb "the spread of influenza."

In downtown Tehran, shops were shuttered and riot police were out in force. A group of schoolgirls marched through the streets, shouting against the government as cars stuck in traffic honked their support, witnesses said. Anti-government chants also echoed from the University of Tehran campus.

Amini, detained for allegedly violating the country’s strict dress code for women, remains the potent symbol of protests that have posed one of the most serious challenges to the regime.

With the slogan #WomanLifeFreedom, the demonstrations first focused on women's rights and the state-mandated hijab, or headscarf for women. But they quickly evolved into calls to oust the clerics that have ruled Iran since the 1979 revolution.

The protests have also galvanized university students, labor unions, prisoners and ethnic minorities like the Kurds along Iran's border with Iraq.

Since the protests erupted, security forces have fired live ammunition and tear gas to disperse demonstrations, killing over 200 people, according to rights groups.

Untold numbers have been arrested, with estimates in the thousands. Iranian judicial officials announced this week they would bring over 600 people to trial over their role in the protests, including 315 in Tehran, 201 in the neighboring Alborz province and 105 in the southwestern province of Khuzestan.

Tehran prosecutor Ali Salehi told the state-run IRNA news agency that four protesters were charged with "war against God," which is punishable by death in Iran.

Iranian officials have blamed the protests on foreign interference, without offering evidence.



The impact of Iran's uprising beyond its borders

Tensions in Iraqi Kurdistan are high, following several missile and drone attacks in the region from the Iranian Revolutionary Guard.

They were the worst attacks on their closest neighbours for a decade, and were tied to the ongoing protests inside Iran.

The BBC's Nafiseh Kohnavard has been to the highly sensitive border area, and sends this report.

Video by Daisy Walsh, Gabriel Chaim and Lina Issa
BBC


Mahsa Amini: Protesters take to Iran’s streets 40 days after her death

Oct 26, 2022

Channel 4 News

Across Iran hundreds of thousands of people have taken to the streets to mark the 40th day of mourning for Mahsa Amini, the young woman who died in police custody after being arrested for not covering her hair completely. In some places those protests have been met with force. The largest gathering was some 600 kilometres from Tehran, in Mahsa Amini's hometown of Saqez in the Kurdish region of Iran.


Iran: hundreds flock to Mahsa Amini's grave 40 days since her death
Oct 26, 2022
Guardian News
Iranian security forces clashed with protesters who gathered in Mahsa Amini's hometown, the northern Iranian city of Saqqez, as mourners marked 40 days since her death. Amini, 22, died on 16 September, three days after her arrest by the morality police while visiting Tehran with her younger brother. 

  

Iranian forces reportedly open fire on protesters 
mourning Mahsa Amini 40 days after her death


Al Jazeera English

It has been 40 days since the death of 22-year-old Mahsa Amini. The 22-year-old was arrested in Tehran by Iran’s so-called “morality police” for allegedly not wearing a hijab. She later died in police custody. Her death sparked protests in Iran and around the world. Tehran has imposed internet restrictions and arrested many for taking part in the demonstrations. Al Jazeera's @Dorsa Jabbari reports from Tehran, Iran.

Iranians mark 40 days of protest since death of Mahsa Amini | AFP
Oct 26, 2022
AFP News Agency


Amateur images show Iranian protesters marking 40 days since the death of Mahsa Amini, by blocking traffic in a street in the capital Tehran and gathering at her burial place in Amini's hometown of Saqqez. Amini, a 22-year-old Iranian of Kurdish origin, died on September 16, three days after her arrest by the morality police for allegedly violating the dress code.
Police open fire on protesters in the hometown of Mahsa Amini where thousands gathered 40 days after the 22-year old died at the hands of the morality police. FRANCE 24'S Olivia Bizot traces the events.


UK PM Rishi Sunak reinstates fracking ban in another reversal of Truss policy

Fracking will be banned in England under Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, reversing a decision made by his predecessor Liz Truss.


Reuters
London,
UPDATED: Oct 26, 2022 

Rishi Sunak was sworn in as Britain's first Indian-origin Prime Minister on Tuesday 
(Photo: AFP)

By Reuters

Fracking will be banned in England under Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, reversing a decision made by his predecessor Liz Truss, as the new British leader returned to a 2019 Conservative Party manifesto pledge.

During her short term as prime minister, Truss had lifted a moratorium on fracking, arguing last month that strengthening the country's energy supply was a priority.

In parliament, Sunak was asked about fracking, and said he stood by a 2019 manifesto commitment on the issue.

The Conservatives' 2019 policy prospectus said they would "not support fracking unless the science shows categorically that it can be done safely."

Asked by a reporter if Sunak's comment meant that fracking was "back in the bin", Sunak's spokesman said "That's correct."

"You've got the position set out in the manifesto, which the prime minister pointed to," the spokesman told reporters. "Obviously it'll be for BEIS (the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy department) to come forward with a bit more detail on that."

Truss had said fracking - extracting shale gas from rocks by breaking them up - would be allowed where it was supported by communities, but the plans had faced opposition from many lawmakers, including from her governing Conservatives.

Fracking has also been opposed by environmental groups and some local communities. It was banned in 2019 after the industry regulator said it was not possible to predict the magnitude of earthquakes it might trigger.

--- ENDS ---

 

UK Sunak government to ban strikes and protests

The replacement as prime minister of Liz Truss with Rishi Sunak was carried out at the insistence of the financial oligarchy, whose main demand is that the government step up their attacks on the working class.

Newly Appointed Prime Minister Rishi Sunak holds his first Cabinet Meeting the morning after assuming office. October 26, 2022, London, United Kingdom [Photo by Simon Walker/No 10 Downing Street / CC BY-NC-ND 2.0]

Truss was thrown out because her September mini budget of £45 billion in tax cuts for the richest was paid for with borrowing, rather than the immediate imposition of additional austerity. While her axing revealed differences between factions of the ruling Conservative Party over how to finance further vast subventions to the super-rich, there are none when it comes to imposing the necessary dictatorial measures required to enforce this.

Boris Johnson’s 2019 election manifesto pledged to bring in Minimum Service Levels (MSLs) during transport strikes, which would make industrial action in the sector ineffective. Another policy aimed at neutering strikes, dating back to the 2015 Conservation election manifesto, was to legislate to allow agencies to supply temporary workers to cover workers taking industrial action.

The legislation on agency workers became law on July 21. At the same time legislation was passed to raise the level of maximum damages that courts can award against a trade union when strike action has been found “unlawful”. For the largest unions, the maximum is now £1 million.

These laws went through even though Johnson had announced his resignation on July 7, prompting the leadership election that brought Truss to power.

Truss announced she would seek to legislate on MSLs within 30 days of taking office. The task now falls to Sunak, with the law enacted in early 2023.

The scale of the government’s class war offensive is underscored by the Public Order Bill—one of the most draconian pieces of legislation in British history, effectively ending the right to protest and further clamping down on strikes.

The Bill has been used to revive sections of the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act 2022 deemed so nakedly dictatorial they were voted down by the House of Lords. They include making it unlawful for a person to interfere with the use or operation of key national infrastructure, including airports, the road network, railways and newspaper printers. Effective industrial action in these sectors would be essentially illegalised.

Protests are deemed illegal if they include acts causing “serious disruption to two or more individuals, or to an organisation”. “Serious disruption” includes “noise”, meaning that any protest can be declared illegal.

Jail sentences of up to 51 weeks are introduced for people who “lock on” to immovable objects or each other.

Police are also granted massive new stop and search powers and the right to issue “Serious Disruption Prevention Orders”. An SDPO can be imposed on people who have participated in at least two protests within a five-year period, whether or not they have been convicted of an offence. The person can be served a two-year order forbidding them from attending further protests.

Those handed an SDPO can be forced to wear an electronic tag to monitor their movements.

To impose this dictatorial assault, Sunak brought back as home secretary one of the most right-wing figures in the Tory party, Suella Braverman. This was just days after she was forced to stand down from the position for breaching the ministerial code.

Home Secretary Suella Braverman leaves the first Cabinet meeting under Prime Minister Liz Truss in 10 Downing Street. September 7, 2022, London. [Photo by Simon Dawson/No 10 Downing Street / CC BY-NC-ND 2.0]

Two days before Truss resigned, Braverman slipped through a last-minute amendment allowing the home secretary of the day to apply for injunctions against anyone they deem “likely” to carry out protests that could cause “serious disruption” to “key national infrastructure”, prevent access to “essential” goods or services, or have a “serious adverse effect on public safety”.

In the final House of Commons vote on the Public Order Bill the government won with a majority of 49. Labour voted against only on the basis that the current repressive apparatus of the state was adequate to clamp down on protests. But Labour MP Sarah Jones boasted, “The Labour party, last April, called for greater injunction powers following the disruption by Just Stop Oil… We suggested injunctions because they are more likely to prevent further disruption to, say, an oil terminal than more offences to criminalise conduct after it has taken place, with all the added costs and logistics of removal. Injunctions are more straightforward for the police, they have more safeguards as they are granted by a court, and they are future-proof when protesters change tactics.”

With further protests held by environmental groups, Starmer warned of the repression he had lined up were Labour to take office. He told an LBC Radio phone-in show Monday that during his tenure (2008-2013) as director of public prosecutions, “we always had laws available” to prosecute people taking such action.

He added, “What we were pushing for in that was longer sentences for those who were gluing themselves to roads and motorways. We didn’t get that through, but that’s what I wanted.” Asked by host Nick Ferrari, “And that’s what you’d want in the future?”, Starmer replied, “Yes”.

The unions have done nothing to mobilise their millions of members against the legislation. The only response from the Trades Union Congress was a declaration from outgoing leader Frances O’Grady, “If ministers cross the road to pick a fight with us then we will meet them halfway… Read my lips: We will see you in court!”

Among the key section of workers the legislation is aimed at suppressing are tens of thousands of rail staff, who have taken national strike action throughout the last few months. The Minimum Service legislation sets the stage for mass firings, with the government stating that under it “specified workers who still take strike action will lose their protection from automatic unfair dismissal.”

Train drivers picket line at London's Euston station, October 1, 2022 [Photo: WSWS]

The main concern of ASLEF train drivers’ union leader Mick Whelan was that the Minimum Services Level Bill “will only lead to industrial strife lasting longer.” Whelan played down the dangers of the savage legislation and intentions of the Tory government, stating, “The government claims that similar legislation exists in other European countries, such as Germany, France, and Spain. Yes, it does, but what the government doesn’t know—or doesn’t choose to say—is that it is not enforced. Because they know it doesn’t work.”

This is false. Not only is such legislation used by these governments and others; even more draconian legislation has been used as the class struggle sharpens throughout Europe on a regular basis.

This year alone, striking Spanish airline workers and metal workers have been subjected to Minimum Service Levels. This summer Spain’s Socialist Party (PSOE)-Podemos government and Ryanair imposed a minimum service requirement preventing many workers from legally stopping work. In the case of the metal workers’ strike in Cantabria, 150 workers were banned from striking by the imposition of a 100 percent minimum service requirement in 12 companies.

This month the Macron government in France requisitioned striking refinery workers to force them back to work in order to break a powerful action hitting the arteries of the economy.

This offensive has accelerated over the last decade as the ruling class in Europe enforced brutal austerity to make workers pay for the 2008 global financial meltdown.

In December 2010, Spain’s PSOE government forced 2,200 air traffic controllers back to work at gunpoint to smash a wildcat strike. Armed soldiers stood over them with the threat of immediate arrest should they stop work.

In January 2013, the New Democracy-led Greek coalition government, which included the social democratic PASOK and the Democratic Left, placed striking metro workers under martial law, forcing them back to work under pain of imprisonment. The following month, the coalition invoked emergency powers in the form of a “civil mobilisation,” formally conscripting striking ferry workers into military service and ordering them to return to work.

The ruling class knows a new global economic crisis and new rounds of austerity can only be imposed on the working class by even more aggressive and violent means. Workers must be politically armed to face the class battles immediately ahead.

DUCK AND COVER

Why Are NATO and Russia Both Now Training for Nuclear War?

Russia's strategic bomber Tu-160.
In this Thursday, Aug. 7, 2008 photo, Russia's strategic bomber Tu-160 or White Swan, the largest supersonic bomber in the world, seen at Engels Air Base near Saratov, about 450 miles southeast of Moscow, Russia. (AP Photo/Misha Japaridze)

We should be deeply concerned that, in the midst of what U.S. President Joe Biden has described as the greatest risk of Armageddon since the Cuban missile crisis, Russia and NATO are this week conducting virtually simultaneous exercises of their nuclear forces, including live (conventional) missile launches. Both Biden and Russian President Vladimir Putin no doubt believe the risks involved in signalling their resolve this way are manageable, but experience during the Cold War suggests otherwise.

Advertisement

Clearly, Putin would not use a tactical nuclear weapon against Ukraine if he believed it would ultimately lead to a nuclear exchange with the United States. That would be suicidal for the Russian regime, to say nothing of the broader global implications. But even threatening their use or conducting military exercises in a crisis can trigger events that rapidly increase the risk of a wider war. Richard Ned Lebow, an expert on nuclear risk, has identified three primary paths by which this can occur: pre-emption, miscalculated escalation and loss of control.

Pre-emption refers to the dynamics in a crisis in which neither side may want a war but each fears an imminent attack by the other and feels compelled to strike first to prevent a disadvantageous outcome. Of course, there's no significant advantage to either side in striking first in an all-out nuclear war, but leaders may be convinced that advantages exist at lower levels of warfare.

Strategist Thomas Schelling's work on this issue is particularly notable, and cycles of mutually reinforcing belief in imminent attack are possible whenever the element of surprise confers significant advantage.

Advertisement

The risks around NATO's 1983 Able Archer exercise may have come close to triggering such a pre-emptive escalatory cycle. For a range of reasons, Soviet intelligence analysts and political leaders believed the exercise was preparation for a NATO first strike against the USSR, and they started preparing for it.

Miscalculation refers to crossing a threshold in the mistaken belief that the action will be tolerated by the adversary. Two good examples are the American decision to march north of the 38th parallel in Korea in 1950, and Argentina's invasion of the Falkland Islands in 1982. Both led to responses that had not been considered likely -- Chinese entry into the Korean War, and a determined British campaign to retake the islands.

Loss of control might occur for any number of reasons. Military preparations or procedures might be poorly understood by political leaders, and certain steps taken by one side to defensively heighten readiness might be interpreted by the other as an offensive move. Their early warning and intelligence systems might misread force-posture changes in the adversary, leading one side to increase its own alert levels, which then triggers the other to do the same. The two sides can become locked in an action–reaction feedback loop.

Perhaps the classic example of loss of control is the July crisis of 1914, although it unfolded at a much slower pace than would be the case today with nuclear-armed adversaries. Statesmen and generals made deliberate decisions, including choices to accept or seek 'limited' war. But mutual and interacting mobilisations contributed to the outbreak of a world war in a 'quasi-mechanical manner'.

Failures of technology can also lead to loss of control. In 1960, U.S. early warning systems incorrectly interpreted with high certainty that the rising moon was a Soviet nuclear missile attack. Fortunately, decision-makers correctly identified it as an error. Vastly improved early warning systems would make that sort of error highly unlikely today, although other technological vulnerabilities continue to exist.

A profoundly worrying risk of loss of control relates to the interplay between restrictions placed on nuclear weapons to prevent their accidental or unauthorised use in peacetime (known as 'negative controls') and the systems to ensure their authorised use in crises ('positive controls'). As a nuclear state seeks to prepare forces for potential use -- or simply prepares them to signal resolve to an adversary, without the intention to employ them -- the balance of controls shifts from negative to positive measures.

Under typical peacetime conditions, many nuclear states physically separate warheads and delivery systems. That's not true of all systems; nuclear ballistic missile submarines are a critical case here. But states don't tend to have bombers sitting on the tarmac with nuclear missiles or free-fall weapons already loaded. Examples of positive controls include the protocols and codes through which release authority is communicated and targets confirmed.

At a heightened state of readiness, with warheads married to delivery systems and various potential delivery systems physically dispersed and held at shorter and shorter notice, these positive controls assume much greater relative importance. In effect, the 'safety catches' are gradually released, increasing the capacity to launch and the risk of accidents.

The range of escalation options open to Russia is broad and has been repeatedly parsed over the past eight months. Putin could conventionally target Western supply lines at a border location or conduct a nuclear test in the Artic, or even the Black Sea, as a signal. He could also 'jump rungs' on the so-called escalation ladder and use a relatively small 'tactical' nuclear weapon, either demonstratively on Ukrainian territory or on military targets.

Pre-emption, miscalculation and loss of control -- and their linkages -- could well play out in the lead-up to or aftermath of any of these actions.

Putin may simply not believe that an American-led response would follow a given escalatory action by Russia. Or he could believe that the response would be limited enough to be tolerable. That is, he could miscalculate.

Or, if Putin used a tactical nuclear weapon and the U.S. responded with large-scale, conventional strikes as signalled by retired American general David Petraeus recently, the risks of loss of control and pre-emption might both increase. Russian military leaders might misread preparations for conventional strikes against battlefield targets in Ukraine as instead positioning for strikes on Russia's leadership or command-and-control systems.

Other factors could interact with this kind of escalatory dynamic. We are currently experiencing a heightened period of solar flare or 'sunspot' activity, which has historically interfered with satellites, as well as with terrestrial high-frequency radio. One hopes Russian and American systems have been hardened to withstand this well-known problem, but it is emblematic of any number of prima facie unlikely factors that could contribute to catastrophic escalation.

In 1963, the year after the Cuban missile crisis, U.S. President John F. Kennedy gave a speech professing his commitment to peace. Among many remarks that resonate nearly 60 years later, Kennedy observed: '[N]uclear powers must avert those confrontations which bring an adversary to a choice of either a humiliating retreat or a nuclear war. To adopt that kind of course in the nuclear age would be evidence only of the bankruptcy of our policy or a collective death wish for the world.'

Putin's humiliation is Putin's doing, and Ukraine is understandably committed to reconquering its own territory. Paths must be found despite these realities that avert the spectre of the worst possible outcome for Ukraine, Russia and the rest of the world. A good starting point would be for leaders to understand that the risks of nuclear escalation are likely to be even greater than they have assumed.

William Leben is an analyst on secondment to ASPI (where this first appeared) from the Australian Army. The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Department of Defence, the Australian Army or the Australian government.

This article originally appeared on 19fortyfive.com.

 

RESEARCHERS CONDUCT ‘VIRTUAL AUTOPSY’ OF A MUMMIFIED 17TH CENTURY CHILD


RESEARCHERS LED BY DR ANDREAS NERLICH OF THE ACADEMIC CLINIC MUNICH-BOGENHAUSEN, HAVE CONDUCTED A ‘VIRTUAL AUTOPSY’ OF A MUMMIFIED 17TH CENTURY CHILD, USING CUTTING-EDGE SCIENCE ALONGSIDE HISTORICAL RECORDS TO SHED NEW LIGHT ON RENAISSANCE CHILDHOOD.

The child was found in an aristocratic Austrian family crypt, where the conditions allowed for natural mummification, preserving soft tissue that contained critical information about his life and death.

The body was buried in an unmarked wooden coffin instead of the elaborate metal coffins reserved for the other members of the family buried there.

The team carried out a virtual autopsy and radiocarbon testing, and examined family records and key material clues from the burial to try to understand who the child was and what his short life looked like.

“This is only one case,” said Nerlich, lead author of the paper published today in Frontiers in Medicine, “but as we know that the early infant death rates generally were very high at that time, our observations may have considerable impact in the over-all life reconstruction of infants even in higher social classes.”

The virtual autopsy was carried out through CT scanning. Nerlich and his team measured bone lengths and looked at tooth eruption and the formation of long bones to determine that the child was approximately a year old when he died. The soft tissue showed that the child was a boy and overweight for his age, so his parents were able to feed him well – but the bones told a different story.

The child’s ribs had become malformed in the pattern called a rachitic rosary, which is usually seen in severe rickets or scurvy. Although he received enough food to put on weight, he was still malnourished. While the typical bowing of the bones seen in rickets was absent, this may have been because he did not walk or crawl.

Since the virtual autopsy revealed that he had inflammation of the lungs characteristic of pneumonia, and children with rickets are more vulnerable to pneumonia, this nutritional deficiency may even have contributed to his early death.

“The combination of obesity along with a severe vitamin-deficiency can only be explained by a generally ‘good’ nutritional status along with an almost complete lack of sunlight exposure,” said Nerlich. “We have to reconsider the living conditions of high aristocratic infants of previous populations.”

The son of a powerful count

However, although Nerlich and his team had established a probable cause of death, the question of the child’s identity remained. Deformation of his skull suggested that his simple wooden coffin wasn’t quite large enough for the child. However, specialist examination of his clothing showed that he had been buried in a long, hooded coat made of expensive silk.

He was also buried in a crypt exclusively reserved for the powerful Counts of Starhemberg, who buried their title-holders — mostly first-born sons — and their wives there. This meant that the child was most likely a first-born son of a Count of Starhemberg.

Radiocarbon dating of a skin sample suggested he was buried between AD 1550-1635, while historical records of the crypt’s management indicated that his burial probably took place after the crypt’s renovation around AD 1600. He was the only infant buried in the crypt.

“We have no data on the fate of other infants of the family,” Nerlich said, regarding the unique burial. “According to our data, the infant was most probably [the count’s] first-born son after erection of the family crypt, so special care may have been applied.”

This meant that there was only one likely candidate for the little boy in the silk coat: Reichard Wilhelm, whose grieving family buried him alongside his grandfather and namesake Reichard von Starhemberg.


Frontiers

https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.979670

 Image Credit: Frontiers

FORWARD TO THE PAST
New James Webb Space Telescope photos show a massive galaxy cluster bending light
SPACE.COM

Is it two galaxies, or two star clusters? Astronomers aren't yet sure what the James Webb Space Telescope spotted in an image of the early universe.



















The massive gravity of galaxy cluster MACS0647 is gravitationally lensing several other systems in this image. (Image credit: SCIENCE: NASA, ESA, CSA, STScI, and Tiger Hsiao (Johns Hopkins University) IMAGE PROCESSING: Alyssa Pagan (STScI))

In a dance of dark matter, NASA's deep-space observatory caught light being bent in the distant universe.

The massive James Webb Space Telescope mirror used a galaxy cluster's gravity to take a look at a known galaxy far behind, but there's a twist: the new research published Wednesday (Oct. 26) suggests Webb may be viewing two galaxies and not one. (The region has been imaged before by the Hubble Space Telescope, but this new view is sharper than ever.)

"We're actively discussing whether these are two galaxies, or two clumps of stars within a galaxy," Space Telescope Science Institute astronomer Dan Coe, an instrument scientist for Webb's near-infrared camera, said in a NASA statement(opens in new tab). "We don't know, but these are the questions that Webb is designed to help us answer."

Related: Why the James Webb Space Telescope's amazing 'Pillars of Creation' photo has astronomers buzzing

Hubble saw the objects, found 10 years ago and called MACS0647-JD, as a "pale, red dot" formed just 400 million years after the Big Bang that kickstarted the universe, according to Coe. While Webb revealed that one object was actually two, the nature of what the new telescope is seeing remains a mystery.

Webb's team is committed to releasing science in progress and as such, this finding is not yet peer-reviewed and is still in early discussion. If Webb spotted two galaxies, there's an even more intriguing possibility: a galactic merger might be in progress in the early universe.

"If this is the most distant merger, I will be really ecstatic," said Tiger Yu-Yang Hsiao, a Ph.D. graduate student at john Hopkins University, in the same statement. But whether Webb is viewing two star clusters or two galaxies, there are clear differences between them: one object set is slightly bluer with lots of stars, and the other is slightly redder with lots of dust.

RELATED STORIES:

 —  Dazzling James Webb Space Telescope image prompts science scramble

—  Magnificent Pillars of Creation sparkle in new James Webb Space Telescope image

—  NASA's James Webb Space Telescope: The ultimate guide

Webb's use of gravitational lensing is not new to astronomy, but exploiting the ability of massive objects to bend light will bring new insights with the telescope's sensitive instruments. Webb is optimized to look at the early universe, which is receding rapidly from us in infrared wavelengths.

Webb's expected 20 years of space observations will greatly expand our catalog of early galaxies from "only tens" of objects to many more, said Rebecca Larson, a National Science Foundation fellow and Ph.D. graduate student at the University of Texas at Austin.

"Studying them can help us understand how they evolved into the ones like the galaxy we live in today, and also, how the universe evolved throughout time," Larson said in the same statement(opens in new tab). She added she is looking forward to when Webb can create "deep fields" of a single spot in the sky, as Hubble did numerous times, as this will uncover even more objects in the early universe.

UK

Made.com close to collapse after sale talks fail as online furniture retailer stops taking online orders

The company has refused to clarify what will happen to orders still outstanding, only saying the suspension of new orders remained “under review” and that “a further announcement will be made as appropriate”

Embattled online furniture retailer Made.com has stopped taking orders from customers after talks regarding a possible sale of the business failed, pushing the group towards administration.

The company has refused to clarify what will happen to orders still outstanding, only saying the suspension of new orders remained “under review” and that “a further announcement will be made as appropriate”.

The decision to stop taking new orders, which was announced this morning, came after Made.com told investors last night that it had been left with no “funding proposals or possible offers” as talks with a potential buyer had ended.

The retailer said insolvency was on the cards if another company or investor did not come to its rescue soon.

“If further funding cannot be raised, or a firm offer for the company is not received before the company’s cash reserves are fully depleted, the board will take the appropriate steps to preserve value for creditors,” the group said in a statement on Tuesday.

Made.com has seen a remarkable reversal of fortunes since floating on the London Stock Exchange only 15 months ago.

People sprucing up their homes during lockdowns boosted sales at Made.com, but the company quickly became unstuck due to supply chain problems.

Customers cancelled their orders in droves after having to wait months for their sofas to be delivered.

Then the cost of living crisis came, hitting demand for big ticket items like furniture, contributing to a severe slump in Made.com sales and forcing the company to issue several profit warnings.

Last month, it decided to put itself up for sale, after concluding that it would be unable to raise money needed to prop up the company on the public markets in the current environment.

It warned that it needed to secure £70m in funding over the next 18 months to stay alive.

Made was worth £775m when it floated on the London Stock Exchange in June last year. Today the business is worth just £2m.

If customers waiting for their orders never receive them, they can ask for their money back thanks to the The Consumer Rights Act 2015.

Consumer champion Scott Dixon said: “Customers can raise a chargeback with their bank or credit card provider and cite “breach of contract” under the Consumer Rights Act 2015 to reverse the payment instead as it’s an unfulfilled order and contract.

“This can be done within 120 days of an order being placed and accepted.”

Finance Ireland pulls 10-year fixed mortgages as ECB meets


Finance Ireland pulls 10-year fixed mortgages as ECB meets
Finance Ireland pulls 10-year fixed mortgages as ECB meets© Provided by Irish Examiner

Founder of Finance Ireland Billy Kane.

Finance Ireland has pulled its 10-year fixed mortgage products, delivering a blow to the Irish mortgage market that reflects the pressures building as the European Central Bank prepares to hike rates further. 

The long-established lender, which is led by industry veteran Billy Kane, had offered among the most-competitive long-term fixed-term rates in a market dominated by the big banks, which had until recently offered fixed rates of short duration. 

Finance Ireland said the withdrawal of its 10-year and longer fixed rates was a "temporary" move caused by global market uncertainty over interest rates.                           

However, Finance Ireland is a so-called non-bank lender which means it relies more than traditional lenders directly on markets to fund its mortgages to borrowers. 

Markets have in recent weeks reflected the uncertainty about how high the European Central Bank will push interest rates next year in its fight to tame inflation

It comes as market participants are betting the European Central Bank will sanction a rate increase of 75 basis points, or by three quarters of a point, when its governing council meets on Thursday.       

Leading mortgage broker Michael Dowling said Finance Ireland had offered among the best ultra-long-term fixed rate loans. The withdrawal of the products showed up the weakness of the non-bank funding model at a time when interest rates were rising rapidly for the first time in over a decade, he said. 

Rachel McGovern, director of financial services at business group Brokers Ireland, said the move was “worrying".   

“The non-pillar banks do have a different funding model to the pillar banks but there is a strong rationale for long-term fixed interest rates remaining to be a feature of the market,” she said.    

Eurozone government bond yields steadied ahead of the European Central Bank meeting. Money markets fully price in a 75 basis-point rate hike, according to Refinitiv data.

Eurozone inflation came in at an annual rate of 9.9% in September, the highest on record and well above the European Central Bank's 2% target rate, data showed earlier this month.

Germany's 10-year government bond yield, the benchmark for the eurozone, drifted down to 2.13%, having dropped earlier this week. 

“We suspect the European economy is already in a recession due primarily to the deepening energy shock, as Europe is a large net energy importer, unlike the US, and gas dependency is significant,” Lale Akoner, senior market strategist at BNY Mellon Investment Management, said.

“This puts the ECB in a bind as to the pace of its hiking cycle. We continue to expect a front-loaded tightening by the ECB, with another 75 basis-point rate hike this week, taking their policy rate to 1.5%,” she said.

Meanwhile, consultancy Capital Economics predicts that the US Federal Reserve will hike US rates also by a further 75 basis points when it meets next week.     

“But that ultra-aggressive pace of tightening won’t continue indefinitely and, while he will be keen to avoid stoking more excitement in the markets over a potential ‘pivot’, (Fed) chair Jerome Powell might offer a slightly stronger hint that smaller rate hikes lie ahead,” the consultancy said. 

- Additional reporting from Reuters