Monday, October 31, 2022

BACK TO WORK VIOLATES ILO LAW
CUPE to stage provincewide protest Friday in response to Ontario's ban on strike



TORONTO — A union representing approximately 55,000 Ontario education workers said Monday its members will walk off the job on Friday despite the government tabling legislation to impose contracts and ban a strike.



Ontario to introduce education contract today to avert looming support staff strike
© Provided by The Canadian Press

Laura Walton, president of the Canadian Union of Public Employee's Ontario School Board Council of Unions, said whether workers continue to protest after Friday "will be left up to what happens."

"I am so proud because our members have said, 'Enough is enough,'" Walton said.

The Ontario government introduced legislation Monday to impose a contract on CUPE's education workers -- including librarians, custodians and early childhood educators -- and avert a strike that was set to start Friday.

CUPE has said it will explore every avenue to fight the bill, but the government said it intends to use the notwithstanding clause to keep the eventual law in force despite any constitutional challenges. The clause allows the legislature to override portions of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms for a five-year term.


"We want to make sure that there's no issues, litigation or otherwise, that could essentially get these kids back out of class because of strikes locally or provincially," Education Minister Stephen Lecce said.

"This proposal, this legislation, provides absolute stability for kids to the extent we can control it and ensures they remain in a classroom, that nothing, nothing at all now or in the future could prevent a child's right to be in a classroom learning."

The government had been offering raises of two per cent a year for workers making less than $40,000 and 1.25 per cent for all others.

Lecce said the new, four-year deal would give 2.5 per cent annual raises to workers making less than $43,000 and 1.5 per cent raises for all others.

CUPE has said its workers, which make on average $39,000 a year, are generally the lowest paid in schools and it has been seeking annual salary increases of 11.7 per cent.

CUPE Ontario president Fred Hahn said workerswere in a legal strike position as of this Thursday and they will take a stand for public education.

"If that bill passes before Friday it doesn’t matter. If they say it’s illegal to strike then we will be on a political protest," he said.

Hahn said education workers were subject, a decade ago, to an imposed wage freeze and back-to-work legislation from the then-Liberal government, and more recently legislation by the Ford government that capped public sector employees' wage increases at one per cent a year.

"We may in fact, challenge this in court, but we are first going to challenge it in our communities. We are not going to allow our rights to be legislated away. We are not going to simply stand by and accept this attempt by the government to bully our members," he said.

Related video: CUPE serves province with strike notice for Ontario education workers

CUPE serves province with strike notice for Ontario education workers

At least four Ontario school boards have said they would shut down schools if support staff fully withdraw their services. The Toronto District School Board said in an update late Monday that it will have no option but to close all of its schools Friday.

"Student supervision and safety are our top priorities and without the important services of these school-based employees, we cannot guarantee that our learning environments will remain safe and clean for all students," the board said in its statement.

Lecce said it was "regretful" to hear that CUPE plans to walk out despite the legislation.

"It is certainly our intention that kids will be in school, we will pass a law, and obviously, I think there's not a parent in this province who would be supportive of children staying home for even one day of the strike," he said.

The legislation sets out fines for violating a prohibition on strikes for the life of the agreement of up to $4,000 per employee per day, while there are fines of up to $500,000 for the union.

Walton said the union would foot the bill for any such fines.

David Doorey, a York University professor specializing in labour and employment law, said there has been only one other Canadian use of the notwithstanding clause in back-to-work legislation — in Saskatchewan in the 1980s — but the law has changed dramatically since then.

"Today, the Charter protects a right to collective bargaining and to strike," he said.

"As a result, the Ontario government requires the notwithstanding clause to protect itself from a lawsuit...Almost certainly, the new Keeping Students in Class Act would violate the Charter rights of the educational workers."

Noa Mendelsohn Aviv, executive director of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, said the notwithstanding clause was never meant to be used in contract negotiations.

"This misuse, and the flagrant disregard for individual rights is wrong and it is dangerous to our constitutional democracy," she said in a statement.

The four major teachers' unions are also in the midst of contract negotiations with the government and the Elementary Teachers' Federation of Ontario said Monday that it walked away from the table for the day in support of CUPE.

"We unequivocally condemn the Ford government’s imposition of a concessionary contract on some of the lowest-paid education professionals working in Ontario’s schools," ETFO president Karen Brown wrote in a statement.

The average CUPE employee makes $26.69 an hour. There are vast differences in workers' salaries, even in the same job classification, due to the number of hours worked in a week — some employees work 40, others work 35, while some work less than that — differences in boards, as well as some employees getting paid for 12 months a year while others are laid off for the summers.

The Ontario Secondary School Teachers' Federation said it stands in solidarity with CUPE members against the "undermining" of their collective bargaining rights. The union said its focus remained on making progress at the bargaining table in its own negotiations.

Government House Leader Paul Calandra said the legislature would be in session Tuesday at 5 a.m. in order to speed up passage of the legislation.

CUPE and the government had made little progress at the bargaining table over the past few months other than agreeing to standardizing bereavement leave. They were far apart on wages, with CUPE saying an additional $3.25 an hour would help the lowest-paid education workers catch up after years of wage freezes and restraint, as well as high inflation.

Lecce had framed their proposals as a 50-per-cent increase in compensation, which added together the wage requests, overtime pay, preparation time, an extra week of work, and professional development.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 31, 2022.

Allison Jones, The Canadian Press


Ontario education workers will walk off the job Friday despite anti-strike legislation, CUPE says

CBC/Radio-Canada 
TODAY


The union representing some 55,000 Ontario education workers says its members will walk off the job Friday in a province-wide protest, regardless of Ontario's proposed anti-strike legislation.

At a news conference Monday, the union said education workers will "withdraw their labour" to protest against the move by the province, which they called a "monstrous overreach."

The Ontario government introduced the Keeping Students in Class Act on Monday, which invokes the notwithstanding clause to impose a contract on education workers and avert a strike. The clause — or Section 33 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms — gives provincial legislatures or Parliament the ability, through the passage of a law, to override certain portions of the charter for a five-year term.

Education workers could face fines of up to $4,000 per day should they strike, the legislation states.

The union held the news conference hours after the provincial government announced it plans to bring in legislation to block the potential job action.

CUPE has said they will explore every avenue to fight the bill, but the government said it intends to use the notwithstanding clause to keep the eventual law in force despite any constitutional challenges.

Speaking to reporters Monday afternoon, Ontario Education Minister Stephen Lecce called the union's decision to proceed with striking "unacceptable."

"The government has been left with no choice but to take immediate action today," Lecce said, indicating the union rejected its latest offer, adding he believes the legislation is in fact constitutional.

The government had been offering raises of two per cent a year for workers making less than $40,000 and 1.25 per cent for all others. Lecce said the new, four-year deal would give 2.5 per cent annual raises to workers making less than $43,000 and 1.5 per cent raises for all others.

CUPE has said its workers, which make on average $39,000 a year, are generally the lowest paid in schools and the union has been seeking annual salary increases of 11.7 per cent.

"The government is going to pass the bill. We're going to move forward," said Lecce.

The education minister said its move was not a blanket approach, saying it will continue to negotiate with other education unions.


Unclear how long protest could go on

As for whether the job action will run longer than one day, union officials said that remains to be seen.

The union also said it will come up with financial support for any consequences that workers might face for protesting in the face of the legislation.

On Sunday, education workers represented by the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) gave the required five days' notice for job action, positioning its members — including educational assistants, custodians and early childhood educators, but not teachers — to go on full strike as early as Friday.

Several Ontario school boards have said they will shut down schools if support staff withdraw their services.

The government and education workers returned to the bargaining table Sunday afternoon but there doesn't appear to have been any progress since.

Union officials said the province's offer put forward Sunday would have provided only a nickel more for each worker, giving the union an ultimatum. Instead of the government holding a negotiation, officials said they learned the government intended to legislate against a strike if the union didn't acquiesce.


Laura Walton, dressed as Rosie the Riveter on Halloween, speaking at Queen’s Park in Toronto on Monday
 Evan Mitsui/CBC

"If Stephen Lecce cared about kids, he wouldn't have handed $200 to parents," said CUPE member Laura Walton, dressed in a Rosie the Riveter Halloween costume, an American character representing women who worked in factories and shipyards during the First World War — a choice she said was intended to send a message.

Still, she said, "negotiations aren't done."

ETFO walks away from bargaining Monday


Meanwhile, in a news release Monday, the Elementary Teachers' Federation of Ontario said it "unequivocally" condemned the Ford government's move.

The union representing some 83,000 Ontario elementary teachers said it ended its own negotiations with the government for Monday because it could not "in good conscience, sit across the table from the government," ETFO President Karen Brown said.

"ETFO stands with CUPE members and their right to strike for better pay and working conditions, and not with a regressive government that is cloaking anti-labour legislation as being pro-education," said Brown.

The Ontario Secondary Schools Teachers' Federation (OSSTF) also issued a statement, calling the proposed legislation "heavy-handed," "effectively undermining and disrupting their rights to free and fair collective bargaining."

The union, which represents more than 60,000 members across Ontario says it "stands in solidarity" with CUPE's members, but that its focus remains on its own negotiations with the province.

"We continue to call on the Ford government to work within a fair process that respects and upholds all workers' Charter rights, and to invest in public education and negotiate a fair deal," OSSTF President Karen Littlewood said.

Ford government to table legislation to impose contract on education sector union

By Colin D'Mello Global News
Updated October 31, 2022 


The Ford government will introduce legislation on Monday to impose a four-year contract on thousands of education support workers in order to avoid a strike — a move that will likely trigger a court challenge by the union.

The dramatic escalation in the months-long contract negotiations came after the Canadian Union of Public Employees, which represents 55,000 custodians, clerical staff, librarians, and early childhood educators, gave the government its notice to strike on Friday, Nov. 4.

READ MORE: Education workers rally outside Toronto Congress Centre ahead of Doug Ford event

CUPE’s Laura Walton characterized the offer as an “ultimatum” from the Ford government after months of negotiations.

The government’s latest offer, which will now be legally imposed on union workers, would give employees earning less than $43,000 a 2.5 per cent salary increase per year, while those earning above $43,000 would receive a 1.5 per cent yearly increase in pay.

That is a slight increase from the previous offer, which was 1.25 per cent for those making over $40,000 and 2.0 per cent for those making below that.

CUPE asked the government for an 11 per cent increase in wages, citing the high cost of living and historically low pay.


READ MORE: Mediated contract negotiations between government and CUPE break down ahead of strike deadline

In a statement, Education Minister Stephen Lecce said the government presented a “generous” offer and was going to follow through on a promise to keep students in class.

“Because CUPE refuses to withdraw their intent to strike, in order to avoid shutting down classes we will have no other choice but to introduce legislation tomorrow, which will ensure that students remain in-class to catch up on their learning,” Lecce said.

The union, however, is warning the government it could end up in court over the legislation and questions whether the government negotiated in good faith.

“They had the legislation all drawn up, which proves they had no intention of negotiating fairly with education workers,” Walton said at a late Sunday news conference.

While Lecce has been warning for weeks that government wouldn’t allow a strike to proceed given several years of school disruptions due to COVID-19, the Minister always maintained his mandate from the Premier was to reach a negotiated settlement with the union.

But as contract talks stalled, the government shifted its tone and focused more on preventing a strike rather than being able to reach a deal.

The legislation, set to be tabled at 1 p.m. Monday, is also a “signal” to teachers’ unions, a source said, which are still in the early stages of bargaining with the government.

“Our intentions are clear,” the source said of the government’s plans of imposing contracts on other education-sector unions.

By imposing a contract, Premier Doug Ford will be copying former-premier Dalton McGuinty’s work from 2012, when the Ontario Liberals imposed a contract on teachers’ unions ahead of a strike.

Bill 115, Putting Students First Act, froze wages and limited union members’ right to strike, triggering a court challenge by five education sector unions.

An Ontario Superior Court judge later ruled that Bill 115 “substantially interfered with meaningful collective bargaining” and that the process of imposing a contract was “fundamentally flawed.”

READ MORE: Wynne says legislation that imposed contracts on teachers in 2012 was ‘problematic’

“It could not, by its design, provide meaningful collective bargaining. Ontario, on its own, devised a process. It set the parameters which would allow it to meet fiscal restraints it determined and then set a program which limited the ability of the other parties to take part in a meaningful way,” Judge Thomas Lederer wrote in a 2016 judgment.

Earlier this year the Elementary Teachers Federation was awarded a $103-million “remedy” to distribute to former and current members of the union.

Once the Ford government tables the legislation they will have just four days to pass the legislation, in order to avoid CUPE’s province-wide strike currently scheduled for Nov. 4.

 


SPACE RACE 2.0
China launches 3rd and final space station component



BEIJING (AP) — China's third and final module docked with its permanent space station Tuesday to further a more than decade-long effort to maintain a constant crewed presence in orbit, as its competition with the U.S. grows increasingly fierce.


China launches 3rd and final space station component© Provided by The Canadian Press

The Mengtian module arrived at the Tiangong station early Tuesday morning, state broadcaster CCTV said, citing the China Manned Space agency.

Mengtian was blasted into space on Monday afternoon from the Wenchang Satellite Launch Center on the southern island province of Hainan. It was expected to take about 13 hours to complete the flight and docking mission.

A large crowd of amateur photographers, space enthusiasts and others watched the lift-off from an adjoining beach.

Many waved Chinese flags and wore T-shirts emblazoned with the characters for China, reflecting the deep national pride invested in the space program and the technological progress it represents.

“The space program is a symbol of a major country and a boost to the modernization of China's national defense," said Ni Lexiong, a professor at Shanghai University of Political Science and Law, underscoring the program's close military links.

“It is also a boost to the confidence of the Chinese people, igniting patriotism and positive energy,” Ni said.

Mengtian, or “Celestial Dream,” joins Wentian as the second laboratory module for the station, collectively known as Tiangong, or “Celestial Palace.” Both are connected to the Tianhe core module where the crew lives and works.

Like its predecessors, Mengtian was launched aboard a Long March-5B carrier rocket, a member of China’s most powerful family of launch vehicles.

Tiangong is currently populated by a crew of two male and one female astronauts, according to the China Manned Space Agency.

Chen Dong, Cai Xuzhe and Liu Yang arrived in early June for a six-month stay on board, during which they will complete the station’s assembly, conduct space walks and carry out additional experiments.

Following Mengtian’s arrival, an additional uncrewed Tianzhou cargo craft is due to dock with the station next month, with another crewed mission scheduled for December, at which time crews may overlap as Tiangong has sufficient room to accommodate six astronauts.

Mengtian weighs in at about 23 tons, is 17.9 meters (58.7 feet) long and has a diameter of 4.2 meters (13.8 feet). It will provide space for science experiments in zero gravity, an airlock for exposure to the vacuum of space, and a small robotic arm to support extravehicular payloads.




Related video: Watch: China launches third module to complete permanent space station






Loaded: 0.00%

Play


Unmute
0

Watch: China launches third module to complete permanent space station


The already orbiting 23-ton Wentian, or “quest for the heavens" laboratory is designed for science and biology experiments and is heavier than any other single-module spacecraft currently in space.

Next year, China plans to launch the Xuntian space telescope, which, while not a part of Tiangong, will orbit in sequence with the station and can dock occasionally with it for maintenance.

No other future additions to the space station have been publicly announced.

In all, the station will have about 110 cubic meters (3,880 cubic feet) of pressurized interior space, including the 32 cubic meters (1,130 cubic feet) added by Mengtian.

China’s crewed space program is officially three decades old this year, with the Mengtian launch being its 25th mission. But it truly got underway in 2003, when China became only the third country after the U.S. and Russia to put a human into space using its own resources.

The program is run by the ruling Communist Party’s military wing, the People’s Liberation Army, and has proceeded methodically and almost entirely without outside support. The U.S. excluded China from the International Space Station because of its program's military ties.

Despite that, China is collaborating with the European Space Agency on experiments aboard Mengtian, and is cooperating with France, Germany, Italy, Russia, Pakistan and the UN Office for Outer Space Affairs (UNOOSA) on a range of projects from aerospace medicine to microgravity physics, according to the Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Prior to launching the Tianhe module, China’s Manned Space Program launched a pair of single-module stations that it crewed briefly as test platforms.

The permanent Chinese station will weigh about 66 tons — a fraction of the size of the International Space Station, which launched its first module in 1998 and weighs around 465 tons.

With a lifespan of 10 to 15 years, Tiangong could one day find itself the only space station still running, if the International Space Station adheres to its 30-year operating plan.

China has also chalked up successes with uncrewed missions, and its lunar exploration program generated media buzz last year when its Yutu 2 rover sent back pictures of what was described by some as a “mystery hut” but was most likely only a rock. The rover is the first to be placed on the little-explored far side of the moon.

China’s Chang’e 5 probe returned lunar rocks to Earth for the first time since the 1970s in December 2000 and another Chinese rover is searching for evidence of life on Mars. Officials are also considering a crewed mission to the moon.

The program has also drawn controversy. In October 2021, China’s Foreign Ministry brushed off a report that China had tested a hypersonic missile two months earlier, saying it had merely tested whether a new spacecraft could be reused.

China is also reportedly developing a highly secret space plane.

China’s space program has proceeded cautiously and largely gone off without a hitch.

Complaints, however, have been leveled against China for allowing rocket stages to fall to Earth uncontrolled twice before. NASA accused Beijing last year of “failing to meet responsible standards regarding their space debris” after parts of a Chinese rocket landed in the Indian Ocean.

China's increasing space capabilities also featured in the latest Pentagon defense strategy released Thursday.

“In addition to expanding its conventional forces, the PLA is rapidly advancing and integrating its space, counterspace, cyber, electronic, and informational warfare capabilities to support its holistic approach to joint warfare," the strategy said.

The U.S. and China are at odds on a range of issues, especially the self-governing island of Taiwan that Beijing threatens to annex with force. China responded to a September visit to Taiwan by U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi by firing missiles over the island, holding wargames and staging a simulated blockade.

The Associated Press
How 2022's Nobel Prize Winners In Physics Proved Einstein Wrong

Richard Milner - TODAY

Every now and then, news hits that "such and such has gotten a Nobel Prize. Hurray!" So Nobel Prizes are good, right? Big, prestigious something-or-other awards that confer some vague honor upon the recipient, and then: done. Folks return to their keyboards, lattes, gas bills, what-have-you, and nothing seems to change. What's the big deal, anyway?


Mathematical universe image© Lia Koltyrina/Shutterstock

To answer that question, let's look at past recipients on the Nobel Prize website. Martin Luther King, Jr. won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1964 "for his non-violent struggle for civil rights for the Afro-American population." Sir Alexander Fleming won the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1945 "for the discovery of penicillin and its curative effect in various infectious diseases." In the realms of art, science, and humanitarian work, Nobel Prizes are awarded to people "who, during the preceding year, shall have conferred the greatest benefit to humankind," as award creator Alfred Nobel said in his will in 1895. He gave away his fortune to subsequent generations, to reward those who advance and enrich the world within the domains of medicine, physics, chemistry, literature, and peace.

This year, the Nobel Prize in Physics was split between Alain Aspect, John Clauser, and Anton Zeilinger. Even if you've never heard of them, their work proved Einstein wrong, shattered our understanding of reality itself, and led directly to the quantum computing revolution. To understand how and why, we've got to do a big-brain dive into history, science, and the very nature of space and time.

The Mesh Of Spacetime


Moon spinning around Earth© canbedone/Shutterstock

So what's the official reason for granting Alain Aspect, John Clauser, and Anton Zeilinger 2022's Nobel Prize in Physics? "For experiments with entangled photons, establishing the violation of Bell inequalities and pioneering quantum information science," as the Nobel Prize website says. To understand what that means, we've got to go back that most oft-cited, frizzy-haired genius of math and science: Albert Einstein.

Einstein's 1905 Theory of Special Relativity (the E = mc2 one) said that anything with mass -- you, a leaf, Mars -- can never move faster than the speed of light. Space and time are one bounded mesh, spacetime; moving faster through space means moving slower through time. It so happens that on Earth, folks are close enough together, and slow-moving enough, to experience time the same. Einstein's 1915 Theory of General Relativity said that gravity is like a dent in spacetime. An object like Earth makes a dent big enough to make the moon spin around it, like a ball around a drain. The sun is so massive that all of our solar system's planets spin around it, and so on (both per Live Science).

In the end, Einstein believed that space exists "locally," meaning that objects affect each other by being in direct contact with each other, per Space. To creatures like us, that should make sense. Why would a book fall over if nothing pushed it? But when objects get really, really small the rules change, and things get weird.

Spooky Action At A Distance



Entangled quantum particles across apce© YouTube/Dr. Ben Miles

So how in the heck could a particle a galaxy away affect what happens in my coffee mug? That's impossible, surely. Nothing travels faster than light, Einstein said -- things far away are in my past and will take some time to get here. For big objects, this is totally true and Einstein was right. But for objects smaller than an atom -- quarks, neutrinos, bosons, electrons -- it's false. At sub-atomic size, quantum mechanics -- the physics of the really small -- has proven that space is not "local," as The Conversation explains. Particles can affect other particles light years away, instantly. How? We'll get to that later.

Related video: Good News | Meet the Nobel Prize winners: This is how they have changed our lives

Einstein thought that such "spooky action at a distance" was an absurd idea. Other physicists, like Richard Feynman, thought differently. During the 1930s at the onset of an investigation into quantum mechanics, Einstein, Boris Podolsky, and Nathan Rosen published a paper debunking non-local, quantum physics (readable on the Physics Review Journal Archive). On the other side, Richard Feynman joined up with Julian Schwinger and Shinitiro Tomonaga to say that quantum physics was real. The latter three, much like the current 2022 winners, were eventually awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1965.

Feynman, like Einstein, worked in the realm of mathematics. It took until the 1960s for another physicist, John Bell, to develop the math into something testable. It took until the 1970s for 2022 Nobel Prize winner John Clauser to actually test it.

The Entanglement Of Bell's Theorem



Quantum particle diagram© RAGMA IMAGES/Shutterstock

To be clear, Einstein didn't doubt any researcher's results, he doubted the reasons for the results. If quantum mechanics is real and two particles can interact at any distance, instantly, he figured there must be some "hidden variables" at work -- something we don't know about. Physicist John Bell, however, demonstrated that there are no hidden variables -- none -- that can account for quantum mechanics, as Brilliant outlines. This work, known as Bell's Theorem or Bell's Inequality, focused on sussing out patterns in particle behavior that could be tested later, as Dr. Ben Miles explains on YouTube.

As far back as 1935, physicist Erwin Schrödinger had tried to explain quantum mechanics through his now-famous Schrödinger's Cat thought experiment. In a nutshell: if a cat is in a box, is it alive or dead? Well, so long as I don't check, there's a 50/50 chance either way (barring any horrible smells).


Similarly, imagine that we want to measure a light particle (a photon), which can oscillate either vertically or horizontally like a sound wave: either, a) It's oscillating one way from the moment its created, and we don't know until we measure it (this is what Einstein thought), or, b) It obtains a characteristic the moment it's checked; before then, it's in an either/or "superposition." Believe it or not, the latter is true. But for every particle measured, a twin with the opposite measurement exists somewhere in the universe. That's quantum entanglement.

A Provably Weird Universe


Picture of space© Rawpixel.com/Shutterstock

But really, you might think, how could something not have a characteristic until it's measured? Judging by everyday life, such a notion is absurd. If I drop a coin behind the couch, of course, it lands face up or face down regardless of whether or not I see it. If I check and it's face up, then that's the way the coin's been since I dropped it. And yet, as we keep learning: this is simply not the case at sizes smaller than an atom. Why? No one still has any clue, don't worry. But thanks to the work of 2022's Nobel Prize winners, we know it's true. Those winners -- Alain Aspect, John Clauser, and Anton Zeilinger -- are the ones who finally developed ways to test and measure quantum entanglement in real life, beyond the theoretical realm of paper and mathematics.

All three gentlemen built on the work of the previous ones, starting with Clauser and ending with Zellinger, as Nature explains. The details of their tests, described on the excellent YouTube channel PBS Spacetime, are beyond the scope of this article. Suffice it to say that each researcher closed loopholes in testing methods that might have allowed for the presence of Einstein's hidden variables. Clauser did his work in the 1970s, Aspect in the '80s, and Zellinger in 1997. As Zellinger humbly said, "This prize would not be possible without the work of more than 100 young people over the years."

The Quantum Computer Leap


IBM Q System One quantum computer© Boykov/Shutterstock

Alright, so quantum weirdness is true. So what? you might ask. Back when John Bell wrote his hidden variable-disproving theorems in the 1960s there was no practical use for investigating the truth of quantum entanglement. David Kaiser, physicist at MIT and colleague of the Nobel Prize-winning Clauser, said of quantum physics in the '60s, "People would say, in writing, that this isn't real physics -- that the topic isn't worthy," per Nature. And now? We've got quantum computers based on such supposedly once-useless theory.

And what in the world is a quantum computer? Why, it's a computer that isn't there until you log in, we glibly joke. But truthfully, explaining quantum computers would require thousands of more words. The short version is, as Quanta Magazine outlines: they're computers with greatly expanded processing power because of the same quantum mechanics that influences sub-atomic particles like electrons. Regular computers make computations based on values of 1s and 0s -- binary values. In a quantum computer, quantum superpositions -- the possibility for either a 1 or 0 until measured -- allow for differently complicated calculations. This is useful because microchips are reaching the limit of their smallness. The smallest are 10 nanometers, smaller than a single virus, per semiconductor company ASML.

In the end, such work is possible not only because of the current Nobel Prize winners, but because of nearly 100 years of collective research. And in a very real way, we also have Einstein's skepticism to thanks.

Read this next: Everything We Know About The History Of The Universe
A 4,000-Year-Old Writing System That Finally Makes Sense To Scholars

Carlo Massimo -


You could be forgiven for never having heard of the civilization of Elam. Elam flourished in southern Iran, in the modern state of Khuzestan, about four or five thousand years ago. The Elamites had close cultural ties to the Mesopotamian civilizations to the west, like the Babylonians; they built ziggurats, for instance (via Britannica). They had a number of unique customs, though, including royal succession, and possibly property rights being passed down matrilinearly, from mothers to sons (instead of fathers to sons), which suggests that Elamite women enjoyed a degree of importance. The Elamites were eventually swallowed up by other cultures, and their capital, Susa, would become the home of the kings of Persia.


cuneiform© Viacheslav Lopatin/Shutterstock

But what vexed archaeologists and philologists for centuries was the Elamite language. They simply couldn't read it. According to Smithsonian, the earliest Elamite script looked like Mesopotamian cuneiform (like the one shown above), but no one could quite decode it.

Linear Elamite



elamite script cuneiform© alexreynolds/Shutterstock

Smithsonian notes that only 43 examples of this early script, called Linear Elamite, have ever been discovered. It had fallen out of use by about 1800 B.C., replaced by western forms of cuneiform and then by Greek. It wasn't clear whether the words expressed or depicted by Linear Elamite were words of the same language as the later, readable texts. Perhaps it was a different language altogether.


In 2015 came a breakthrough. A certain François Desset, professor of archaeology at the University of Teheran, was curious about the inscriptions on a collection of silver beakers once thought to be a hoax to fleece collectors, but recently confirmed as genuine. On many of them he found two parallel inscriptions: one in the familiar Elamite language, and another in Linear Elamite. He had found the key to the puzzle. The Linear characters were pictograms, rather than alphabetical letters, which made them hard to translate, but Desset guessed from the context that some of them stood for names. Slowly the language revealed its secrets. Desset would translate 72 Linear characters, leaving only a handful still unclear.

Like The Rosetta Stone


rosetta stone© WH_Pics/Shutterstock

Desset's work bears a remarkable resemblance to the translation of the Rosetta Stone. The first archaeologists could not decipher Ancient Egyptian hieroglyphics, with their suns and birds and abstract shapes instead of letters. But when Napoleon invaded Egypt, his men found a tablet inscribed with three languages (shown above) in the Nile mud near the town of Rosetta.


According to the British Museum, this was one of many "mass-produced" tablets from the year 196 B.C., a kind of public bulletin. It repeated the same message in three kinds of script: hieroglyphics, "demotic" Egyptian, and Greek. A Frenchman named Champollion realized that the names of non-Egyptian people were recognizable in the jumble of hieroglyphics. Slowly, he began to pair Greek words and phrases with ancient Egyptian ones, eventually unravelling the code. It is remarkable that another Frenchman, 200 years later, should use exactly the same method to decode Linear Elamite: recognizing names in the band of script, and deducing the rest from there.
THEY DON'T DO FILTERS
The Republican National Committee is suing Google over Gmail's spam filters

The RNC has accused the company of political bias.


I. Bonifacic
@igorbonifacic
October 22, 2022 1:37 PM

SOPA Images via Getty Images


The Republican National Committee is suing Google. According to Axios (via The Verge), the organization filed a lawsuit with California’s Eastern District Court on Friday. The complaint accuses Google of sending “millions” of RNC campaign emails to Gmail spam folders in an extension of the company’s “discriminatory” filtering practices.

“At approximately the same time at the end of each month, Google sends to spam nearly all of the RNC’s emails,” the complaint claims. “Critically, and suspiciously, this end of the month period is historically when the RNC’s fundraising is most successful.”

The lawsuit comes after Google launched a controversial program to appease GOP lawmakers concerned about its filtering practices. In June, after a study found that Gmail was more likely than competing email clients to filter emails from Republican campaigns, the company said it would work with the Federal Election Commission to pilot a system designed to prevent political messages from ending up in spam folders. The concession came after Republican lawmakers introduced a bill that sought to ban email platforms from using algorithms to route campaign messages automatically.

According to a recent report from The Verge, the Republican National Committee is not taking advantage of the program Google built to address the party’s concerns. The organization’s complaint doesn’t explicitly mention the pilot. Instead, it points to a training session the RNC attended on August 11th, the same day the FEC approved Google’s program.

“This discrimination has been ongoing for about ten months — despite the RNC’s best efforts to work with Google,” the organization claims. Google did not immediately respond to Engadget’s request for comment. “As we have repeatedly said, we simply don't filter emails based on political affiliation," the company told Axios, adding that Gmail’s spam filters reflect user actions.

Expert: Pupils and teachers must be taught about pornography to combat sexism and misogyny

HUMAN SEXUALITY AND JEALOUSY NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED IN COURSES; THE SENSE OF OWNERSHIP IN RELATIONSHIPS IS TOXIC

Professor Megan Maas
Professor Megan Maas

Schoolchildren and their teachers in Scotland must be taught about pornography to combat sexism and misogyny, according to a leading expert.

Professor Megan Maas believes lessons to curb the influence of adult material on young minds would help cut an epidemic of sexual harassment in schools.

She spoke after we reported girls attending more than 360 Scots schools have detailed incidents of sexual harassment and violence on a campaigning website in the last year.

Everyone’s Invited, a platform campaigning against “rape culture” that encourages survivors of sexual assault and harassment to post anonymous testimonies, received accounts of sexual harassment from youngsters in 466 primary and secondary schools, up 361 from 105 in 2021.

Adolescent sexuality expert Maas, of Michigan State University, has urged policy-makers in Scotland to consider adopting her classroom programmes, which show how popular culture and pornography shape behaviour towards sexual misconduct in schools.

She said: “The goal is for participants to become critical consumers of pornography instead of passive viewers.

“When it comes to staff, the goal is to increase awareness of the changes in pornography so educators can better understand students’ lives.

“Given that pornography is a default sex educator in the absence of sex education, many young people are getting the wrong idea about what sexual experiences should be like.”

A survey commissioned by The Sunday Post in December as part of our Respect campaign discovered one in five teenage girls had been sexually assaulted and three out of five endured some form of harassment. The abuse suffered by girls and young women prompted calls for urgent action to transform how children are taught about relationships and sex and to curb access to online pornography.

Almost 70% of the girls and young women interviewed did not believe the scale of the crisis is understood while nearly 80% said more must be done to curb harassment.

As pornography becomes more prevalent and the issue of sexual harassment in schools attracts more attention, pornography education provides a tool to prevent sexual violence, according to Maas. Her PopPorn programme has four modules for pupils covering pop culture and the history of pornography, gender differences in how teens learn about sex and relationships and research on porn use.

She said: “We’d be happy to do training with school staff in Scotland. I think the programme would translate well to Scottish culture. Although this study publishes our findings with school staff, we also do these trainings with teens themselves and with parents.”

Sandy Brindley, chief executive of Rape Crisis Scotland, agreed that sexual harassment continues to be a major problem for pupils across Scotland.

She said: “A study conducted by Glasgow University in schools involved in our Equally Safe At School programme pilot found two thirds of students in those schools had experienced some form of sexual harassment in the previous six months.

“Sexual harassment has a very negative effect, with pupils reporting feeling ashamed, embarrassed and afraid.

“In some cases, experiences of sexual harassment can have very harmful impacts on young people’s mental health.

“Despite these harmful effects, we also know that young people are not always confident in naming sexual harassment, particularly when it involves behaviours which have become normalised or trivialised.

“They don’t always feel able to challenge these behaviours or talk to school staff about them – and school staff themselves can also struggle to identify these behaviours and to challenge them appropriately.

“We continue to work extensively with schools to tackle these issues. Our Equally Safe At School programme now works with around 200 secondary schools to deliver evidence-based workshops to young people on identifying and preventing sexual harassment, and accessing support. We also provide tools and resources, including training and policies, to support staff teams in achieving this cultural change.

“Many schools are already working hard to address these issues, but it is vital that all schools engage with the problem of sexual harassment to ensure that young people feel fully safe at school and in their everyday lives.”

The Scottish Government said: “There is absolutely no place for harassment or abuse in schools or anywhere else. We continue to take forward actions in schools to address gender-based violence and sexual harassment and we are developing a national framework for schools to help tackle these issues.

“As part of relationships, sexual health and parenthood education, secondary school pupils learn about the damaging and exploitative aspects of pornography and how it can negatively affect mental health and healthy relationships.”

Reading ‘Iranian Love Stories’ as a New Wave of Young Women Fights Back in Iran

Iranian Love Stories by Jane Deuxard and illustrated by Deloupy next to images of cameras. (Image: Graphic Mundi.)

On the final The Mary Sue Book Club entry of 2021, I recommended a translated graphic novel by a French duo that goes by the pseudonyms Jane Deusart and the artist known professionally as Deloupy, entitled Iranian Love Stories. (The name “Jane Deusart” is a shared pseudonym between the two journalists and kept a secret to protect the people they spoke to.) This series of interviews in graphic novel form features vignettes of people aged 20 to 30 speaking on love, freedom, and politics (both intimately and more broadly) in Iran

Despite it appearing like this has nothing to do with the ongoing protest following the death of Mahsa Amini (22), there’s a lot in common, and this book lays the background as to why Gen Z is leading the current fight.)

The journalists didn’t just speak to young people because they have less to lose and everything to gain from their stories being told. These Iranians speaking to the journalists (whose voices are mostly limited to a transition spread between chapters) were teenagers during the Green Movement in 2009. The crackdown and deaths color how they navigate contemporary Iran and their limited pushback against authority, even within their own family (who they put at risk by demonstrating in public or even interviewing for this book.)

More than about love

A significant portion of the book discusses actual love and relationships. Most of the romantic relationships (like the first section about Mila) involve secrecy, as getting found out before marriage can result in terrible consequences, especially for women. However, others include familial concerns. One man has dreamed of leaving and working abroad, but even if he could get out, he fears the state and morality police punishing his mother for his actions.

There’s also a story of a couple not quite being in sync because they didn’t get to know each other fully before moving in—thanks to strict laws in Iran. Even in their own homes, there is a division between politics and freedom.

Page from Iranian Love Stories. By Jane Deuxard and illustrated by Deloupy (Image: Graphic Mundi.)
(Graphic Mundi)

Despite the title and focus of the novel, many of the Iranians interviewed don’t want love alone or, really, at all. They want choice, freedom, and hope. This is not dissimilar to the Green Movement or even the ongoing protest in Iran right now, in which the freedom for women to express themselves is the rallying cry, but is really the tipping point. Several of them, like 20-year-old Saviosh, have done everything “right” as far as going to college, etc., but cannot find work, and the U.S. sanctions at the time squeeze the economy.

Speaking of the economy, not everyone spoken to was wholly upset with the status quo. Because of extreme circumstances, one woman was allowed to leave the country regularly and made bank smuggling over goods. Another pair of women, Kimia and Zeinab, gawked at the idea of working and called American women’s wants misguided, as they felt a semblance of freedom in not wholly participating in public life. With all three of these women, despite general contentment, they did wish for more, but not enough to disrupt their chance of survival. Everyone finds small and large ways of rebelling.

The Green Movement

I’ve talked a lot about The Green Revolution without actually saying what it is. It began as a protest following the reelection of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. It’s widely considered the first social media resistance as it was largely organized online. The Arab Spring (proper) wouldn’t begin until 2011 or later, across the Arab region. Please note that most Iranians are Persian and speak Farsi (not Arabic), but are considered a part of the Arab or SWANA (South West Asia & North Africa) region.

Anyways, not to downplay the action in 2018, outside of the revolution that led Iran to become a semi-independent state, the most impactful protest in recent history is the Iranian Revolution (1979) and the Green Movement. Hundreds of people died in the 2009 protests, people disappeared, and cameras went up everywhere. In Iranian Love Stories, Vahid (26) meets the journalists at the largest cemetery in Iran and tells them, after the events of 2009 and the crackdowns after, he has nothing to lose.

Woman describing voter apathy in Iran and how any change will be blocked by manipulating Islam. By Jane Deuxard and illustrated by Deloupy (Image: Graphic Mundi.)
(Graphic Mundi)

As stated earlier, it’s not just love that guides these people or a single candidate running on reform that influences these young Iranians. They face jail time, public harassment, torture, and execution (regardless of age) for disobeying laws or being suspected of being under “Western” influence. The year before the election, 130 children were sentenced to death or were already awaiting execution. Iran’s government is set up as a theocratic democracy, so people can vote (including women), but a top religious leader can veto laws passed. Also, extremists have their own party in the Iranian government

Amplifying the voices of the current moment

Spurred by the death of Amini, this current moment is both very similar to The Green Movement and yet very different—even more so if justice is brought to the Iranians. Similarly, it is starting with a single grievance but is symbolic of larger issues. Also, like before, this is a protest growing through social media, especially TikTok, and the most vocal are teenagers and preteens.

However, unlike the initial spread mostly staying within Iran, these are spreading across the world. Anyone half paying attention is seeing the siege of college campuses by the morality police and the community gathering as women cut their hair and burn their compulsory hijabs. Also, still early into the protest, people are not demoralized and pessimistic about the idea of change like most of the people spoken to in the novel. Many current protesters and activists are asking for international attention.

Amini’s death so young and as a part of an ethnic minority group (her family is Kurdish) has created solidarity among them. This is under-discussed and reported on in the U.S. because of the way we tend to flatten people we deem so different from us, but this is still important.

Correction 10/24/2022: Initially, I wrote both Jane Deusart and Deloupy were pseudonyms. While Deusart is a secret name for the two journalists, Deloupy is the illustrator’s last name and the one he goes by professionally. This book featured two writers (journalists), and one artist.

(featured image: Graphic Mundi)