Saturday, December 10, 2022

Yellen, Malerba become 1st female pair to sign U.S. currency


Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, left, and Treasurer Lynn Malerba show off money they autographed Thursday. The currency is the nation’s first to be signed by two women.
(LM Otero / Associated Press)

BY FATIMA HUSSEIN AND JOSH BOAK
ASSOCIATED PRESSDEC. 8, 2022

Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen on Thursday helped mark a milestone in U.S. history when she held up a newly minted $5 bill signed for the first time ever by two women.

Yellen’s signature will appear alongside that of U.S. Treasurer Lynn Malerba, the first Native American in that position.

Yellen joked during a stop in Texas about the bad handwriting of some of her male predecessors and said, “I will admit, I spent some quality time practicing my signature.”


“Two women on the currency for the first time is truly momentous,” added Malerba, who traveled with Yellen to a Bureau of Engraving and Printing facility in Fort Worth to provide their signatures.


They ceremonially signed fresh sheets of bills in $1 and $5 denominations and posed with samples to mark the history-making moment. The new notes will go into circulation next year.

Anusha Chari, an economist who chairs the American Economic Assn’s. Committee on the Status of Women in the Economics Profession, calls Yellen’s signature on U.S. currency “a huge milestone, but it also shows us how far we have to go.”

The Treasury Department was created in 1789, and until Yellen only white CHRISTIAN men had led it.


Yellen made her reputation as a stoic chair of the Federal Reserve and a shrewd forecaster, and now is at the forefront of far-flung efforts to use economic levers to help stop Russia’s war in Ukraine, employ tax policy to protect the planet from climate change and oversee a massive effort to strengthen the beleaguered Internal Revenue Service.

That puts her at the center of domestic and global politics, inviting new levels of pressure and second-guessing by friends and foes. She is tackling this challenge as the United States is suffering from inflation that hit a 40-year high this summer and sowed fears of a coming recession.

Even as Yellen watched the fresh bills carrying her signature roll out at the Bureau of Engraving and Printing’s currency facility, her remarks focused on Biden administration policy accomplishments rather than her status as the first woman to serve as Treasury secretary.

On the Ukraine conflict instigated last February by Russian President Vladimir Putin, she said, “Together with over 30 countries, we have denied Russia revenue and resources it needs to fight its war.”

As for the domestic economy, she said, pandemic relief and a new law to boost production of semiconductors have positioned the U.S. “to capitalize on a wave of economic opportunities for the American people, including in communities often overlooked.”

Later, talking to reporters, Yellen said she thinks the U.S. can avoid a recession.

“Obviously, there are risks that the economy faces, but I think we’re not in a wage-price spiral. Supply chain bottlenecks are clearly beginning to ease. That’s helpful,” she said. “I believe we’re on the right track in terms of lowering inflation, and a recession is not inevitable.”

Now, two years into President Biden’s first term, Yellen has put to rest rumors that she might be ready to leave the administration early and is strapping in for more economic — as well as political — battles ahead.

Along with managing the Treasury’s role in the Ukraine war, she faces the herculean task of revitalizing an IRS that is getting an $80-billion funding boost, and enforcing an anti-money laundering effort that requires documenting the beneficial owners of tens of millions of U.S. businesses in hopes of crushing corruption around the world.

She occupies an increasingly politicized role in which Congress and foreign governments matter as much as the financial markets.

Her Treasury Department is implementing an oil price cap aimed at hobbling the Russian economy as House Republican leader Kevin McCarthy of California is questioning the level of U.S. support for Ukraine. The Treasury is also implementing tens of billions of dollars in tax incentives to address climate change, which has rankled some European allies and proved controversial with Republicans.

And the wage gains in the most recent U.S. jobs report suggest the economy might have to endure more pain than expected to bring inflation back to the Fed’s target of 2% annually.

Along the way, Yellen has not shied away from controversy or speaking her mind on issues that many Americans look at solely through a cultural lens.

When Sen. Tim Scott (R-S.C.) at a May congressional hearing told Yellen that she was “harsh” for speaking about the positive economic effects of abortion access for women, she replied, “This is not harsh, this is the truth.” She also has challenged the view that havens for hidden cash lie outside the U.S., instead arguing that the U.S. has become the “best place” to hide illicitly obtained money.

Yellen generated some tension with the White House this year when she veered somewhat from Biden’s insistence that his $1.9-trillion coronavirus aid package did not contribute to inflation.

Republican lawmakers have drawn on analyses by major economists such as Harvard University’s Larry Summers to say that the sum was excessive and sparked inflation. Breakages in the global supply chain and a jump in food and energy costs after Russia invaded Ukraine also have contributed to the rise of prices to uncomfortable levels, putting the economy at heightened risk of a recession.

Yellen acknowledged on CNN in May that she had been “wrong then about the path that inflation would take.” Biden said he had been apprised of the possible risks of inflation when putting together the relief package, but he told the Associated Press in an interview that “the idea that it caused inflation is bizarre.”

Yellen’s predictions at the Treasury about financial markets on other points have proved accurate.

Her warnings about the risks of a deregulated cryptocurrency market foresaw the recent chaos. Crypto markets have seen at least two major crashes, dozens of scams, Ponzi schemes and hundreds of billions of dollars made and evaporated overnight.

Yellen has also used her platform as a top government official to warn that despite women’s advancements in the workplace, a glass ceiling prevents many from reaching the very top positions.

Yellen, the only person ever to lead the Treasury Department, the Federal Reserve and White House Council of Economic Advisors, still gets flak from members of both political parties for not being more dynamic and politically savvy at times and for being too direct at other times.

Summers, Treasury secretary under President Clinton, said in a statement to the Associated Press that Yellen “continues a remarkable career in economic policy at the U.S. Treasury Department. No other Treasury Secretary has had a deeper commitment to social justice as a central goal of macro and financial policies.”

The praise comes as Summers has leveled criticism at the Biden administration for the size of its coronavirus relief, saying its excesses flooded the economy with money and pushed up prices. He has argued that the Fed must continue to raise rates to reduce inflation, an action that could push the U.S. and other nations into a recession.

 

Uyghur groups urge leaders of Muslim states to condemn genocide in China’s Xinjiang

Call comes as Chinese President Xi Jinping visits Saudi Arabia.
By Alim Seytoff for RFA Uyghur
2022.12.08


Uyghur groups urge leaders of Muslim states to condemn genocide in China’s XinjiangChinese President Xi Jinping (C) meets with Saudi King Salman (3rd from R), in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, Dec. 8, 2022.
 Saudi Press Agency via AP

More than 50 Uyghur groups on Thursday urged heads of states and leaders of international organizations meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping this week in Saudi Arabia to condemn China’s atrocity crimes against the Uyghurs and end the genocide in its far-western Xinjiang region.

Xi, who is paying a three-day state visit to Saudi Arabia, signed a comprehensive strategic partnership agreement with King Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud, agreeing to hold a meeting between the two heads of state by turns every two years. During the start of the visit, Chinese and Saudi companies signed more than 30 investment agreements. 

Xi will also attend summits with Arab countries and the Gulf states, including the first China-Arab States Summit. Xi last visited the Middle Eastern country in 2016.

“On various occasions, Uyghur organizations have expressed their great disappointment over the silence of Muslim-majority countries on the Uyghur genocide, which has involved the arbitrary detainment of millions of Uyghurs in concentration camps, where they are forced to renounce their religious beliefs and practices,” a statement issued by the groups said.

It went on to say that authorities have destroyed or damaged thousands of mosques and cemeteries in Xinjiang, which Uyghurs call East Turkistan, while banning religious practices such as giving Islamic names to children, fasting during the holy month of Ramadan, and forcing  Muslims to eat pork and drink alcohol.

In October, many Muslim-majority countries voted against or abstained on a United Nations resolution that sought to raise debate at the Human Rights Council over a report by the former U.N. human rights chief on rights violations in Xinjiang. 

The report documented widespread abuses including torture, arbitrary arrests, forced abortions, and violations of religious freedom, and concluded that the repression there “may constitute international crimes, in particular crimes against humanity.”

“The failure of these countries to allow a space for debate at the Human Rights Council, a body which was created to do exactly that, contradicts the core values and principles of Islam,” the statement said.

Saudi Arabia is the site of Islam’s two holiest places, Mecca and Medina, and the Saudi royal family has responsibility for their guardianship and facilitating religious pilgrimages there.

'Turning a blind eye'

Dolkun Isa, president of the Munich, Germany-based World Uyghur Congress, or WUC, said China is not only committing genocide against the Uyghur Muslims, but also has declared war on Islam. 

“It is completely unacceptable that the leaders of the Muslim world will sit with China’s dictator on the same stage and just talk about business and cooperation by turning a blind eye to China’s attack on Islam,” he told Radio Free Asia.

Gheyyur Qurban, office director of WUC’s Berlin office said countries like Saudi Arabia and Iran not only have remained silent on the Uyghur genocide, but also have supported the Chinese government’s position, even at the U.N. at the expense of their fellow Uyghur Muslims. 

“It is extremely disappointing to see Saudi leaders who claim to be the Protector of the Two Holy Cities receive Xi Jinping, the main culprit of Uyghur genocide, with pompous ceremonies and allow him to hold summits with Mideast leaders to expand China’s infiltration and influence in the heart of Islamic world,” he told RFA.

China is Saudi Arabia's top trading partner, and the kingdom serves as a vital source of crude oil for China. 

WUC, one of the signatories of the statement, also called on Saudi authorities not to repatriate four Uyghurs detained there back to China, saying their extradition would violate the international principle of non-refoulement. The practice forbids a country receiving refugees or asylum seekers from returning them to a nation where they would likely face persecution.

Saudi police arrested two Uyghur men originally from Xinjiang in Nov. 2020 while they were in the country for religious reasons. The arrest was allegedly carried out after the Chinese Embassy in Saudi Arabia requested their extradition. Saudi authorities also arrested Abula Buheliqiemu and her teenage daughter near Mecca this March. 

Authorities told all four that they faced deportation to China.

Translated by Alim Seytoff for RFA Uyghur. Written in English by Roseanne Gerin. Edited by Malcolm Foster.

 vaccine globe shot vaccination

Polarization After COVID-19: The Unvaccinated Face Prejudice In Most Countries


By 

Across all inhabited continents of the world, people show prejudice and discriminatory attitudes towards individuals not vaccinated against COVID-19. This is the result of a global study from Aarhus University, which has just been published in the journal Nature.

Many vaccinated people do not want close relatives to marry an unvaccinated person. They are also inclined to think that the unvaccinated are incompetent as well as untrustworthy, and they generally feel antipathy against them.

The study shows that prejudice towards the unvaccinated is as high or higher than prejudice directed towards other common and diverse targets of prejudice, including immigrants, drug-addicts and ex-convicts.

In contrast, researchers find that the unvaccinated display almost no discriminatory attitudes towards the vaccinated.

“The conflict between those who are vaccinated against COVID-19 and those who are not threatens societal cohesion as a new socio-political cleavage, and the vaccinated clearly seem to be the ones deepening this rift,” says postdoc Alexander Bor, who is the lead author of the study Discriminatory Attitudes Against the Unvaccinated During a Global Pandemic.

Human explanation for prejudice

According to the researchers, the reason for these discriminatory attitudes appears to be that the vaccinated perceive the unvaccinated as free riders. High vaccination uptake is crucial in order to combat the pandemic and secure the public good of normal everyday life without great human or financial losses. And when some people help increase vaccine uptake while others do not, it evokes negative sentiments

“The vaccinated react in quite a natural way against what they perceive as free-riding on a public good. This is a well-known psychological mechanism and thus a completely normal human reaction. Nonetheless, it could have severe consequences for society,” says co-author Michael Bang Petersen, who is a professor of political science at Aarhus University and head of the research project which this study is part of.

”In the short run, prejudice towards the unvaccinated may complicate pandemic management because it leads to mistrust, and we know that mistrust hinders vaccination uptake. In the long run, it may mean that societies leave the pandemic more divided and polarised than they entered it,” says Michael Bang Petersen.

Fundamental rights could be in danger

A survey fielded solely in the United States as part of the overall study shows that not only do vaccinated people harbour prejudice against the unvaccinated, they also think they should be denied fundamental rights. For instance, the unvaccinated should not be allowed to move into the neighbourhood or express their political views on social media freely, without fear of censorship.

“It is likely that we will encounter similar support for the restriction of rights in other countries, seeing as the prejudice and antipathy can be found across continents and cultures,” says Michael Bang Petersen.

Researchers warn against condemnatory rhetoric

In many places, low vaccine uptake still poses a challenge to pandemic management, but the researchers warn authorities against employing a rhetoric of moral condemnation in their attempt to make more people get vaccinated. A strategy otherwise deployed in a number of countries, including France, where president Emmanuel Macron has stated that he wants to ‘piss off’ the unvaccinated to a degree that will make them get vaccinated.

 ”Moral condemnation may strengthen the cleavages and further feelings of exclusion that have led many unvaccinated to refuse the vaccine in the first place. Our prior research has shown that transparent communication about the safety and effectiveness of vaccines is a more viable public-health strategy for increasing vaccine uptake in the long term,” says Michael Bang Petersen.

Robert Reich: How Can We Protect Our
Democracy When Media Doesn’t Let
Us Know It’s Being Threatened? – OpEd



December 9, 2022
By Robert Reich

Sometimes I feel like screaming at the mainstream media for failing to alert people to crucial (although complicated) issues affecting our democracy coming from different parts of government simultaneously.

Case in point: Moore vs. Harper, argued yesterday before the Supreme Court, and the Electoral Reform Act, which must be enacted before the end of this Congress because Republicans won’t touch it once they control the House.

The two are intimately connected but you wouldn’t know that from the mainstream media, which is treating them as two separate stories. Let me make the connection.

In Moore, North Carolina Republicans aim to restore a redistricting map drawn by the GOP-led legislature but rejected as violating the state constitution by North Carolina’s supreme court.

North Carolina bases its argument on the bonkers “independent state legislature” theory, which interprets Article I Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution (authorizing state legislatures to prescribe “the times, places and manner of holding elections”) to give state legislatures sole authority over elections, without interference from state courts.

The theory sprang from the head of Justice William Rehnquist in 2000, who wrote (in a concurring opinion in Bush v. Gore) that “the text of the election law itself, and not just its interpretation by the courts of the States, takes on independent significance.”

Since then, Brett Kavanaugh, Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, and Neil Gorsuch have all endorsed aspects of the theory. Notably, they didn’t disavow it in yesterday’s oral argument.

Not only would the theory open the door to extreme gerrymandering, allowing one party to virtually entrench itself in a state. It could also allow state legislatures to reject the results of a presidential election.

Which is where the Electoral Reform Act, now before Congress, comes in.

Article II of the Constitution requires states to appoint presidential electors “in such manner as the Legislature thereof may direct.” And the Electoral Count Act of 1845 allows state legislatures to choose a new manner of appointing the state’s electors if the vote for the presidency has “failed” in the state.

But what does “failed” mean and who has the authority to declare a failure?

This wasn’t an issue until the 2020 election, when Donald Trump exploited the Act’s vagueness to claim he could overturn the will of the voters.

He pushed state legislatures to appoint electors for him regardless of the popular vote. (Fortunately, they refused.) He pressured congressional Republicans to object to Joe Biden’s electors. (Trump partly succeeded, but not by enough to throw the election his way.) And he pushed Vice President Pence to illegally delay the electoral count so Trump could continue pressuring states. (Thankfully, Pence refused.)

American democracy survived by a whisker. But add in a Supreme Court ruling affirming the independent state legislature theory, and what do you get if Trump (or any other anti-democracy candidate) tries the same thing again? A democratic disaster.

This isn’t wild conjecture. Just weeks ago, after Arizona gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake contested her loss based on absolutely nothing, the election board in GOP-controlled Cochise County refused to certify the results.

Eventually Cochise came around. But in a future presidential election, a GOP-controlled state legislature — armed with a broad “independent state legislature” theory from Moore v. Harper — could seize on this kind of resistance to declare a “failed” election and appoint a slate of fake electors. And neither Congress nor a Vice President could stop them. This time, democracy wouldn’t survive.

Which is why the Electoral Reform Act – now before Congress – is so important.

It would require state legislatures to appoint presidential electors exactly as they’ve been appointed before. So if a state’s laws require that electors certify the person who has won the popular vote, a legislature can’t use the “failed” election loophole to appoint electors for anyone else.

Other provisions require that governors certify the correct electors by a hard deadline before Congress counts them, and allow an aggrieved candidate to trigger expedited judicial review.

Where is the Electoral Reform Act at this point?

Ten Republican senators tentatively support it but Trumpsters are pressuring them to withdraw their support.

With so little time remaining in the lame-duck session, the measure may be attached to the end-of-year spending bill.

But how many close calls like this can a system of self-government endure?

And if the media doesn’t adequately report on issues like this, how can a free people govern themselves to begin with?


Robert B. Reich is Chancellor's Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley and Senior Fellow at the Blum Center for Developing Economies, and writes at robertreich.substack.com. Reich served as Secretary of Labor in the Clinton administration, for which Time Magazine named him one of the ten most effective cabinet secretaries of the twentieth century. He has written fifteen books, including the best sellers "Aftershock", "The Work of Nations," and"Beyond Outrage," and, his most recent, "The Common Good," which is available in bookstores now. He is also a founding editor of the American Prospect magazine, chairman of Common Cause, a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and co-creator of the award-winning documentary, "Inequality For All." He's co-creator of the Netflix original documentary "Saving Capitalism," which is streaming now.

 Candle Ceremony Child Children In Church Christian Russia Orthodox

Putin’s War Against Ukraine Fueling Collapse Of Moscow Orthodoxy At Home And Abroad – Analysis


By  and 

After some initial caution, the leadership of the Russian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate (ROC MP) has become a slavish propaganda tool for President Vladimir Putin’s war against Ukraine. Overall, this shift has done nothing to stem the decline in the church’s influence in Russian society and has exacerbated its demise in the post-Soviet states, which Moscow still views as part of its exclusive canonical territory (see EDM, June 2; Sibreal, December 5).

Events in recent days suggest that the church will not be able to recover either domestically or overseas, even if the ROC MP were to change its position again, further reducing its utility as an ally in the Kremlin’s push for traditional values at home and as an adjunct to Russian revanchism in neighboring countries. As a result, the Moscow church now appears to be on track to lose much of its influence and power at home as well as its aspirations to be more than a church limited to its own country and its co-nationals abroad.

After dramatic growth following the fall of communism, which brought new and more liberal factions into the ROC MP, elements that the hierarchy is now seeking to purge (Ruskline.ru, July 21), the ROC MP has been losing support ever-more rapidly. Accelerating this trend are the war against Ukraine and the positions of Patriarch Kirill specifically and the ROC MP more generally, with some viewing the church as an irrelevant branch of the Russian state and others arguing that the ROC MP has taken a page from Islamist extremists rather than following the gospels (Kasparov.ru, August 18; Afon.org.ua, October 6). Meanwhile, the ROC MP has lost support in the West, not only because of its strident backing of Putin’s war but also because of its readiness to serve as a cover for, or even an arm of, Russian intelligence operations directed against North Atlantic Treaty Organization countries (Novaya gazeta, October 22).

But it is in Ukraine and the other former Soviet republics that the collapse of the ROC MP has gone a step further. In Ukraine, not surprisingly, the collapse of the church’s influence has been the greatest. The share of Ukrainians saying they follow the Moscow church fell from 18 percent in 2021 to only 4 percent after the invasion on February 24, while the share backing the Autocephalous Orthodox Church of Ukraine has risen from 42 to 54 percent (Thinktanks.by, August 7).

As a result, in a move many see as a step toward a complete ban, Kyiv has felt free to restrict the activities of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate, even though the entity has declared itself against the Russian invasion and administratively independent from Moscow (Graniru.org, February 12; Apostrophe.ua, December 2; Vz.ru, December 2).

But Ukraine is far from the only place where the ROC MP has been losing ground at an accelerating rate since Putin launched his expanded invasion of Ukraine. The church has been in retreat not only in other traditionally Christian Orthodox countries, such as Belarus, but also in places where the ROC is small, such as the Baltic states, the South Caucasus and Central Asia (see EDM, August 12, 2021). As a result, earlier this year, the Moscow church established a special Office for the Affairs of Dioceses in the Near Abroad to try to stop or even reverse this trend. But since then, most informed observers say this move amounted to too little, too late (Patriarchia.ru, March 24; Ahilla.ru, March 25; Novaya gazeta, March 27).

Today, the focus of the struggle between the ROC MP and those in other countries who seek independence for their Orthodox churches has become Moldova, a country where 97 percent of the population is Christian Orthodox, but where competing Orthodox hierarchies exist, one loyal to the ROC MP and the other loyal to the Romanian Orthodox Church. Chisinau has been tilting toward the latter over the past decade, and current Moldovan President Maia Sandu has become ever-more supportive of the Romanian church and ever-more hostile to the Moscow one, an approach that reflects her desire to escape from Russian domination and integrate her nation with the West in general and Romania in particular. (For background on this, see EDM, August 12, 2021). Russian citizens and those still part of the Moscow Patriarchate church in Moldova are outraged, but their anger seems to have grown in proportion to the losses they have been suffering on the ground.

In describing this situation with a combination of anger and regret, Maksim Kammerer, a commentator for the pro-Moscow RuBaltic, says that, at the moment, “official Chisinau is doing everything possible so that Moldovans will be under the control of the ‘correct’ Romanian church” rather than remain within the orbit of the ROC MP. This is a policy that the Moldovan government has pursued with increasing vigor over the past decade as part of its plan to break completely with Russia and become more integrated with the West (RuBaltic, December 4).

As Kammerer notes, Chisinau is now backing the Bessarabian Metropolitanate of the Romanian Orthodox Church, which was established in 1992 but remained unrecognized until 2002. Then, on the recommendation of the Council of Europe, Chisinau recognized that hierarchy as legitimate within Moldova. The Bessarabian Metropolitanate within the country controlled only about 3 percent of all Moldovan Orthodox faithful in 2003, a share that rose to 20 percent in 2020. Now, that figure has undoubtedly jumped, though Kammerer does not provide more recent figures. In recent years, Chisinau has pressed for autocephaly of the Moldovan church as the only way to not have a Romanian church on its territory. Moscow, however, remains just as opposed to that as it is to the currently changing status quo.

But now, in the wake of Kyiv’s actions, it appears likely that Chisinau will seek autocephaly more actively and may very well receive it. If that happens, Moscow and the ROC MP will have lost yet another Christian Orthodox country and will be on their way to having a national church without the basis for more expansive claims. In that event, such collateral damage from Putin’s war will cast a shadow on Russia’s future, dramatically limiting Moscow’s possibilities for influence beyond its borders, or even within them.

This article was published by The Jamestown Foundation’s Eurasia Daily Monitor Volume: 19 Issue: 183


Paul Goble

Paul Goble is a longtime specialist on ethnic and religious questions in Eurasia. Most recently, he was director of research and publications at the Azerbaijan Diplomatic Academy. Earlier, he served as vice dean for the social sciences and humanities at Audentes University in Tallinn and a senior research associate at the EuroCollege of the University of Tartu in Estonia. He has served in various capacities in the U.S. State Department, the Central Intelligence Agency and the International Broadcasting Bureau as well as at the Voice of America and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty and at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Mr. Goble maintains the Window on Eurasia blog and can be contacted directly at paul.goble@gmail.com .

The last of the Tharu traditional healers of Nepal

Ramdin Mahato, a Tharu traditional healer from Chitwan. Photo by Gaurav Dhwaj Khadka. Used with permission.

The bustling tourist town of Sauraha, around 180 kilometres from Nepal’s capital city Kathmandu, seldom rests. Nor do the streets. However, the streets of nearby Baghmara in Ratnanagar look deserted. Amidst the concrete houses in the neighbourhood, cropping up on both sides of the street, a one-storey house with a signboard and a herb garden in the front stands out.

Tharu Herbal Garden Homestay, as the board reads, boasts of a demonstration site with several herbs — both rare and omnipresent.

After working for Tiger Tops, an internationally recognized resort inside the Chitwan National Park, for more than 20 years as a nature guide, Ramdin Mahato from Baghmara turned into a traditional healer, gleaning the ethnobotanical knowledge from guruwas, the traditional Tharu healers from nearby districts.

“My great grandfather Mangar Mahato, grandfather Nathu Mahato and father Bighai Mahato — all of them were guruwas,” said Ramdin. “They also had a lot of knowledge about medicinal plants.”

He is proud of a notebook with neatly written natural prescriptions for ailments ranging from irritable bowel syndrome to sleep disorder and depression. Surprisingly, the diary mentions the names of plants not only in Tharu and Nepali languages but also in English, together with the scientific names.

A map showcasing some Tharu traditional healers. StoryMapJS/Leaflet/Map Tiles by Stamen Design. Data by Open Street MapCC BY-SA 3.0

The three-pronged Tharu traditional medicine system

The Tharus healers treat illnesses through their three-pronged medicine system — by using herbs and concoctions, by chanting mantras together with administering herbal medicines, and by massaging.

Called baidh or baidhwa in the Tharu language, the healers have been continuing the tradition, sourcing herbs from nearby forests and using the different parts of the plants to cure illnesses. Dhamis and guruwas — as healers are called in eastern, central and western Nepal respectively — likewise, use both herbs and mantras together to cure illnesses. Sohrainiya, mainly women masseurs who are also adept in midwifery, massage patients to cure illnesses.

However, the age-old medicinal system is bound to disappear. Only a few elder Tharus are continuing the tradition — with no interest from the young generation.

According to research by Pramila Gachhadar in eastern Nepal’s Morang, Sunsari and Saptari districts, the healers have been using around 136 different herbs, administering them as ash, paste, decoction, extract, heated shoot, juice, distilled liquid, powder, vapour, smoke, and oil and have even been using the raw plants, their pulp, resins, roots, and stems, apart from the fruits and flowers.

These plants are used to cure illnesses ranging from menstrual disorders to diabetes, not to mention common ailments like different body aches, fever, vomiting, nausea, dysentery, diarrhoea and skin diseases.

Deforestation has taken a toll on medicinal plants

However, these plants, once found in abundance, are now scarce and rare due to overgrazing, land degradation, habitat destruction, commercial harvesting and deforestation, to name a few of the factors involved.

Achhai Chaudhary, a dhami from Saptari District which is around 300 kilometres east of Kathmandu, said that most of the medicinal plants he uses are found in the farmlands and nearby jungle.

Achhai Chaudhary, a Tharu traditional healer from Nepal’s Saptari District. Photo by Sanjib Chaudhary. Used with permission.

“Resembling tulsi, the common basil, it is a very useful herb,” said Achhai. “Soak the leaves and parts of this herb overnight and drink the water in the morning, it will keep your diabetes at bay. We call it Jethmal in the Tharu language.”

Among the medicinal plants in his backyard, a regularly used herb is locally known for its bitterness. Called “kalpnath” in Nepal’s southern plains, also known as “kalmegh” or green chiretta (Andrographis paniculata), it is used to cure fever and boost immunity. Recently, it was approved by the Thai government to be used in the cure of early stages of COVID-19.

According to Achhai, some of the rare species are found only in the core jungle area, almost after three hours walk from the East-West Highway, which has shifted northwards due to deforestation. Illegal harvesting has also played a key role in the vanishing of plants.

The boundaries created by protected areas

Likewise, Ramdin isn’t aware of any medicinal plants vanishing due to the changing landscape and climate. However, some of the herbs are found in the core area of the Chitwan National Park which was accessible to the locals when the national park wasn’t formed.

Tharus inhabited the land by clearing the forests in Chitwan. The whole area was covered by forests and medicinal plants were found everywhere. Now, most of the forest has been cleared. And even the omnipresent medicinal plants have vanished.

Buddhiram Mahato, an octogenarian guruwa from Chitwan, reminisced about how he would get inside the park without any objection. They would go inside the core jungle area to graze their cattle and while returning collect fodder and precious life-saving herbs. One thing they made sure of was harvesting the herbs sustainably so that there would never be a dearth of medicinal plants.

Ramdin agreed but lamented the difficulty of access. “We still have medicinal plants in the jungle, but we need permission these days. Earlier, we could get to the forest and harvest medicinal plants. We didn’t need any permission.”

Buddhiram Mahato, an octogenarian guruwa from Sauraha. Photo by Gaurav Dhwaj Khadka. Used with permission.

However, medicinal plants can be collected from the forests after taking permission. “A list of herbs/medicinal plants can be collected from national forests and community forests on a sustainable basis by paying royalties after taking permission from division forest offices,” said Anand Chaudhary, Assistant Forest Officer with Division Forest Office, Dhankuta.

As per the Acts and Regulations 2079, Ministry of Forest and Environment, the rate is as low as NPR 2 (less than one US cent) per kilo for Hedychium spicatumDryoathyrium boryanum to NPR 500 (USD 3.77) per piece for Dachtylorhiza hatagirea (paanch aunle).

Dr. Dipesh Pyakurel, a medicinal plants expert, seconds Achhai and Ramdin on the availability of medicinal plants in Nepal’s southern plains. He said, “Terai has only 7 per cent forest cover and only a few medicinal plants from the southern plains are traded like harro [Terminalia chebula] and barro [Terminalia bellirica]. Overharvesting and climate change have affected plants from hills and mountain areas more as the most traded plants are from those areas.”

As per the United Nations, International Trade Statistics Database, Nepal exported more than 10,000 tons of primarily medicinal plants worth around USD 60,000,000 in 2014, destined for more than 50 countries.

When medicinal plants become the last resort

Devi Singh Chaudhary from Nepal’s Dang District has his own little forest of herbs and medicinal plants. Photo by Gaurav Dhwaj Khadka. Used with permission.

Devi Singh Chaudhary is in his seventies but he looks as if he is in his mid-fifties. He lives in an ashram in Junglekuti, literally a hut in the jungle, that has now turned into a sacred place. Around 15 kilometres from the East-West Highway in Lamahi area of Dang District which is around 400 kilometres west of Kathmandu, Junglekuti was founded by a sage, Siddha Baghnath Baba, around 200 years ago. He planted trees around his ashram, a quiet place for meditation.

Upon request, Devi Singh will show visitors all the medicinal plants, including some rare ones, surrounding the ashram and describe their specific uses. He said people come to Junglekuti and ask for medicinal help only after they are sure that allopathic medicines wouldn’t be able to cure their ailments.

Even some doctors practising allopathy have been integrating herbs into their treatment.

“To understand the principles behind Ayurveda, the oldest methodology of healing, I read The Ayurveda Encyclopedia that helped me understand the benefits of different herbal medicines such as Shilajeet, Triphala Churna, Ashwagandha and many more,” said Dr. Ishan Adhikari, a US-returned clinical neurologist and neurophysiologist.

“I use them on neurodegenerative disorders with marked improvement in their symptoms where allopathic medications have not achieved optimal results. Integrating allopathy with Ayurveda has shown promising results in many fields and I will continue to integrate them.”

Need to document the oral knowledge of healing

Devi Singh’s ashram is also a learning centre for traditional healers from across the country and neighbouring districts of India.

“Many people visit the ashram to learn about the medicinal plants and their uses,” said Devi Singh. “But I haven’t noted down the knowledge. It’s all in my head — whatever I learnt from my guru, the teacher and predecessor who looked after the place.”

However, Ramdin’s notebook, which he has been maintaining since 1994, can prove a game-changer in documenting the herbs and their usage.

“If we don’t share this knowledge with others, it will be lost forever,” Ramdin said, beaming.

The story was funded by Earth Journalism Network’s Indigenous Story Grants for 2022.