Saturday, June 10, 2023

RIP
Ama Ata Aidoo, Ghanaian writer who was voice of African women, dies at 81

Ms. Aidoo’s works explored the ghosts of the past such as colonialism and slavery



By Brian Murphy
June 9, 2023 

Ama Ata Aidoo at the Ake Arts and Book festival in Abeokuta, Nigeria, on Nov. 17, 2017. (Pius Utomi Ekpei/AFP/Getty Images)

Ama Ata Aidoo, a Ghanaian playwright and author who became one of Africa’s leading literary voices, exploring West African society through the eyes of women and the ghosts of the past such as colonial rule and slavery, died May 31 at 81.

A family statement announced the death but offered no additional details.

Ms. Aidoo’s career included stints in academia in the United States and political life at home as Ghana’s secretary for education in the early 1980s. The experiences helped shape some of the characters and struggles over more than a dozen novels, plays, short stories and volumes of poetry. Yet she said her work, at its core, was an extension of the oral storytelling traditions used by African women to pass down lore and collective wisdom.

“African women were feminists long before feminism,” Ms. Aidoo said.


She worked like a cultural anthropologist, sifting through layers of history — often rife with oppression and exploitation — in Ghana and other parts of West Africa. Nearly all her central figures were women trying to change their lives but facing challenges imposed by men or cultural forces bigger than themselves.

In Ms. Aidoo’s first play, “The Dilemma of a Ghost” (1964), a Ghanaian student returns home with his American wife, a Black woman who grapples with a new way of life, the historical weight of the slave trade and her ancestry, and the confusion of the post-colonial era.

“Changes: A Love Story,” a 1991 novel that won the Commonwealth Writers’ Prize for best book from Africa, was about a woman who divorces after suffering “marital rape” and then unhappily becomes one of the wives of a Muslim businessman.

In her 1977 semi-autobiographical novel, “Our Sister Killjoy,” Ms. Aidoo took aim at Western values through the racism and alienation felt by a Ghanaian student in Britain and Germany. Ms. Aidoo called Bavaria the “heart of darkness,” repurposing the title of Joseph Conrad’s novel set in Africa.

“Since we met you people 500 years ago, now look at us,” she said in a 1987 interview while discussing Europe’s heavy hand in Africa. “We’ve given everything, you are still taking. I mean where will the whole Western world be without us Africans? Our cocoa, timber, gold, diamond, platinum.”

“Everything you have is us,” she added. “I am not saying it. It’s a fact. And in return for all these, what have we got? Nothing.” (Part of her comments were used in a 2020 song, “Monsters You Made,” by Nigerian performer Burna Boy.)

Ms. Aidoo was widely described as one of Africa’s most prominent feminists. She tried to clarify her goals. Feminism, she said, was an “ideology, like socialism or pan-Africanism” that she supported but thought was too general. Ms. Aidoo saw her mission as trying to change the narrative around African women.

She took offense at what she called Western stereotypes of the “downtrodden wretch” in Africa — women seen as incapable of taking control of their own lives and futures.

“When people ask me rather bluntly every now and then whether I am a feminist, I not only answer yes, but I go on to insist that every woman and every man should be a feminist,” Ms. Aidoo said at an African women’s conference in 1998, “especially if they believe that Africans should take charge of African land, African wealth, African lives, and the burden of African development.”

A defining moment for her came when she was 15. A teacher asked her what type of career she envisioned. “Without knowing why or even how, I replied that I wanted to be a poet,” she recalled.

Four years later, she won a short story contest and was dazzled by seeing her name in print. She bought herself a new pair of shoes with the prize money.

“I had articulated a dream … it was a major affirmation for me as a writer,” she later wrote.

‘Long line of fighters’

Ama Ata Aidoo was born on March 23, 1942, in Abeadzi Kyiakor in a central region of what was known in the West as the Gold Coast, the region’s colonial name. Her twin brother was named Kwame Ata.

Their father was a local chief of the Fante people and was a strong supporter of education, building the village’s first schoolhouse. She called herself part of “a long line of fighters,” often citing her grandfather’s imprisonment and torture by British colonial authorities.

Ms. Aidoo, who for a time in her youth went by the first name Christina, received a degree in English from the University of Ghana in 1964, seven years after Ghana’s independence. Ms. Aidoo was awarded a two-year creative writing fellowship at Stanford University, then returned to Ghana in 1970 to begin a 12-year tenure as a lecturer at the University of Cape Coast.

Her second play, “Anowa,” which debuted in 1970, tackled questions of Africa’s indigenous slave trade in the 19th century through the life of an African woman whose husband becomes an enslaver. The couple’s lives end in tragedy.

After a coup in Ghana in late 1981 by a military officer, Jerry Rawlings, the new government lavished attention on the arts. Ms. Aidoo took the position of education secretary in January 1982, saying she thought “direct access to state power” would give her opportunities to grow education options, particularly for girls. Frustrated by the slow pace of reforms, she wrote her resignation letter after 18 months in the post.

She left for Zimbabwe in 1983, working on curriculum programs for the country’s education ministry. While in the capital, Harare, she wrote a collection of poems, “Someone talking to sometime” (1985), and a children’s book, “The Eagle and the Chickens and Other Stories” in 1986.

She was a writer-in-residence at the University of Richmond in 1989 and was a visiting professor in the Africana studies department at Brown University from 2003 to 2010. In 2000, she founded the Mbaasem Foundation in Ghana to support African women writers.

“I have always felt uncomfortable living abroad: racism, the cold, the weather, the food, the people,” she said in a 2003 interview published by the University of Alicante in Spain. “I also felt some kind of patriotic sense of guilt. Something like, Oh, my dear! Look at all the problems we have at home. What am I doing here?”

Survivors include a daughter. Complete information on survivors was not immediately available.

In 2014, Ms. Aidoo was asked on BBC’s “HARDtalk” program whether she constructs her women characters as a form of literary activism.

“People sometimes question me, for instance, ‘Why are your women so strong?’” she said. “And I say, ‘That is the only woman I know.’”

By Brian Murphy
Brian Murphy joined The Washington Post after more than 20 years as a foreign correspondent and bureau chief for the Associated Press in Europe and the Middle East. Murphy has reported from more than 50 countries and has written four books. Twitter





in Ama Ata Aidoo‟s Our Sister Killjoy” (2010), the novel is read as a reversal of the colonial travel narrative presenting the continued asymmetrical power ...
28 pages


The Politics of Exile: Ama Ata Aidoo's Our Sister Killjoy

January 1991
Studies in 20th & 21st Century Literature 15(1)
DOI:10.4148/2334-4415.1271
LicenseCC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Authors:
Gay Wilentz

Abstract
Ama Ata Aidoo's Our Sister Killjoy or Reflections from a Black-Eyed Squint is a relentless attack on the notions of exile as relief from the societal constraints of national development and freedom to live in a cultural environment conducive to creativity. In this personalized prose/poem, Aidoo questions certain prescribed theories of exile (including the reasons for exile)—particularly among African men. The novel exposes a rarely heard viewpoint in literature in English—that of the African woman exile. Aidoo's protagonist Sissie, as the "eye" of her people, is a sojourner in the "civilized" world of the colonizers. In this article, I examine Aidoo's challenge to prevailing theories of exile, her questioning of the supposed superiority of European culture for the colonial subject, and her exposé of the politics of exile for African self-exile. Through a combination of prose, poetry, oral voicing and letter writing, Aidoo's Sissie reports back to her home community what she sees in the land of the colonizers and confronts those exiles who have forgotten their duty to their native land.



DEFINING THE GHANAIAN FEMINIST NOVEL: A STUDY OF AMA ATA AIDOO’S "OUR SISTER KILLJOY" AND "CHANGES" AND AMMA DARKO’S "BEYOND THE HORIZON" AND "NOT WITHOUT FLOWERS".

Araba Osei-Tutu
2010, Asare-Kumi, Araba Ayiaba (2010). Defining the Ghanaian Feminist Novel: A Study of Ama Ata Aidoo's "Our Siter Killjoy" and "Changes" and Amma Darko's "Beyond the Horizon" and "Not Without Flowers". University of Ghana Legon, Accra, Ghana



Ama Ata Aidoo - Our Sister Killjoy PDF - Our Sister Killjoy PDF
scribd.com

Corporeal imperialism: Textual anti-masturbation in the eighteenth century – and – National negotiation: Toward feminist postnationalism in theory and practice

Resource type
Thesis type
(Essays) M.A.
Date created
2006
Authors/Contributors
Abstract
Essay 1: This essay discusses textual anti-masturbation in the eighteenth century in order to introduce the concept of corporeal imperialism and argue that the history of anti-masturbation prefigures the history of bodily colonialism. Conducting a close reading of Onania; Or, the Heinous Sin of Self-Pollution and Samuel Tissot’s Onanism: Or, a Treatise on the Disorders Produced by Masturbation, this essay illustrates the ways in which the authors link acceptable sexuality to acceptable expressions of citizenship. Essay 2: Arguing that nation is the single most important concept in feminist responses to historical and neo-colonialism, this essay reviews the history of feminist nationalisms through their responses to literal and metaphoric uses of the nation. Using Ama Ata Aidoo’s prose poem Our Sister Killjoy as both an example of necessary nationalism and postnationalism in literature, this essay explores postcolonial nationalism and anti-nationalism while arguing for a theoretical and practical ethic of postnationalism.

In Our Sister KilljoyAidoo is concerned mostly with the estrangement of the African educated class. Sissy, the main character, is offered a grant to receive a ...
MF: In your short story “Our Sister Killjoy” you deal in passing with lesbianism when you write: “Marija's [German married woman] cold fingers on her [Sissie's] ...

especially of Ghana. These three literary works are: Anowa (1970), Our SisterKilljoy or Reflections from a Black-Eyed Squint (1977) and Changes: A Love.
I read Our Sister Killjoy or Reflections from a Black-eyedSquint as the turning point in Aidoo's African (auto)biography. This unclassifiable text.


Colombian government establishes 6-month ceasefire with largest remaining guerrilla group

Ceasefire with National Liberation Army to be phased in over time


Colombia’s government and its largest remaining guerrilla group agreed Friday to a six-month cease-fire at talks in Cuba, in the latest attempt to resolve a conflict dating back to the 1960s.

The government and the National Liberation Army, or ELN, announced the accord at a ceremony in Havana attended by Colombian President Gustavo Petro, top guerrilla commander Antonio García and Cuban officials. The cease-fire takes effect in phases, goes fully into effect in August and then lasts for six months.

"This effort to look for peace is a beacon of hope that conflicts can be resolved politically and diplomatically," top rebel negotiator Pablo Beltrán said at the ceremony.

The talks originally were scheduled to conclude with an official ceremony on Thursday, but were postponed as the parties asked for additional time to work on final details. Petro traveled to the island for the ceremony, saying it could herald an "era of peace" in Colombia.

The accord reached Friday also calls for the formation of a broadly representative national committee by late July to discuss a lasting peace.

"You have here proposed a bilateral agreement, and I agree with that, but Colombian society has to be able debate it, and to participate," Petro said during the ceremony.

García, the rebel commander, said his group was "very confident" in the accord, though he characterized it as "procedural" and not yet the "substantial" kind needed "for Colombia to change."


The Colombian government has agreed to a six-month ceasefire with the National Liberation Army, its largest remaining guerrilla group. (AP Photo/Ramon Espinosa)

Negotiations between the sides had resumed in August, after being terminated in 2019 when the rebels set off a car bomb at a police academy in Bogotá, killing 21 people.

Following that incident, the government of then-President Iván Duque (2018-2022) issued arrest warrants for ELN leaders in Cuba for the peace negotiations. But Cuba refused to extradite them, arguing that doing so would compromise its status as a neutral nation in the conflict and break with diplomatic protocols.

Talks relaunched in November shortly after Petro was elected as Colombia’s first leftist president.

Petro has pushed for what he calls a "total peace" that would demobilize all of the country’s remaining rebel groups as well as its drug trafficking gangs. He has questioned whether senior ELN leaders have full control of a younger generation of commanders who he has suggested are focused more on the illegal drug trade than on political goals.

The ELN was founded in the 1960s by union leaders, students and priests inspired by the Cuban revolution. It is Colombia’s largest remaining rebel group and has been notoriously difficult for previous Colombian governments to negotiate with.


In 2016, Colombia’s government signed a peace deal with the larger FARC group that ended five decades of conflict in which an estimated 260,000 people were killed.

But violence has continued to affect rural pockets of the country where the ELN has been active, along with FARC holdout groups and drug trafficking gangs. Colombian authorities have accused the ELN of involvement in the drug trafficking, but the group’s top leaders have denied that.


Colombian government, ELN rebels sign ceasefire: what you need to know

Deal will take effect Aug. 3, last 180 days

Laura Gamba Fadul |10.06.2023 - 


BOGOTA, Colombia

The third round of peace negotiations between the Colombian government and the National Liberation Army (ELN) guerrilla group ended Friday with an agreement on a cease-fire, the main point on the agenda in talks in Havana.

Colombian President Gustavo Petro and ELN top commander Antonio Garcia signed the agreement after several failed attempts to reach an agreement.

When will it take effect?


On July 6, offensive operations will cease following a preparatory process that will take place from June 9 to July 5. The official national cease-fire will take effect Aug. 3 and last six months.

How far along and how far to go?


The parties have completed three rounds of talks since January. The talks began in Caracas, Venezuela with the second round in Mexico City. The third round in Havana began May 2. The next round will be in September in Venezuela.

The peace process has suffered various setbacks, including Petro´s announcement Dec. 31 of a six-month cease-fire with the ELN and other armed groups -- a claim that was denied by the guerrilla group.

Who will monitor the process?

The agreement will be closely monitored and verified by the UN, Catholic Church, guarantor countries and civil society delegates.

What does agreement include?

Although the deal suspends hostilities between military forces and the ELN, it does not halt criminal actions by the guerrillas such as extortion and kidnapping.

ELN chief negotiator Pablo Beltran said Friday that the guerrillas' "finance operations" will be maintained "for now" and for kidnappings, or “retentions” as they are called by the ELN, "if they are not necessary, they will not happen."

The government has not commented on that issue, which has generated controversy among leaders in Colombia's regions, who said excluding those behaviors from the agreement will increase criminal activity.

Petro said he plans to end the decades-long war with the ELN in May 2025.

Dutch court says Crimean priceless objects will go back to Ukraine

Ukraine, museums in Crimea laid claim to objects since annexation of Crimea in 2014

Burak Bir |10.06.2023 - 
A view from Nakhimov Square as daily life continues in 
Sevastopol, Crimea on March 19, 2023.

LONDON

The Netherlands' highest court ended a nearly decade-long dispute Friday on priceless objects from Crimea by ruling the collection must be handed over to Ukraine.

The Supreme Court of the Netherlands ruled the Amsterdam Court of Appeal correctly applied the law in the case involving the disputed objects from Crimea.

The objects must be handed to Ukraine as determined by the Court of Appeal on Oct. 26, 2021, said the Court, ending a nearly 10-year legal battle about the priceless collection.

The ruling means the artifacts, as "part of the Ukrainian cultural heritage" will be returned to Ukraine, not Crimea which was annexed by Russia in 2014.

The Allard Pierson Museum, which has ensured the safe storage of the objects since 2014 as Ukraine and museums in Crimea laid claim to the objects, said it can now "act in accordance with the ruling."

The Court of Amsterdam ruled in December 2016, that Allard Pierson Museum must hand over the objects to Ukraine. The Crimean museums appealed the ruling.

In its interim judgment, the Court of Appeal ruled that the Allard Pierson Museum had acted lawfully by having the objects in question stored in 2014 pending a final judgment in the legal proceedings. According to the court, Allard Pierson “could not reasonably assess which of the candidates was the due creditor.”

In its final judgment on Oct. 26, 2021, the Amsterdam Court of Appeal ruled that the objects from Crimea, which have been carefully preserved in the Netherlands since 2014, should be handed to Ukraine.

 dollar mask coronavirus covid-19

Winners And Losers In The Post-Pandemic Period – Analysis

By 

Now that we have inflation beat, it seems like a good time to look at what has changed since the pandemic. A full catalog of how the country is different would be a serious undertaking, but we can learn a lot just by examining how consumption patterns have changed over the last three years. And, these data are readily available from the Commerce Department’s website.

Losers in the Post-Pandemic Period

Some of the changes in consumption patterns are obvious. The increase in work from home (as many as 30 percent of workdays are now remote) has led to a sharp drop in the amount we spend on commuting. While real consumption expenditures were 10.8 percent higher in the first quarter of 2023 than in the fourth quarter of 2019, real spending on mass transit was down 17.8 percent. (These figures are all adjusted for inflation.)

Other expenses related to office work were also down sharply. Spending on hairdressing services is down 22.5 percent. Spending on dry cleaning is down by 21.5 percent. Spending in the larger category of personal care and clothing services is down 13.5 percent from its pre-pandemic level. This saves households over $30 billion a year (roughly $100 per household) compared to a situation where these expenses had remained constant as a share of total consumption.

In addition to the plunge in spending on mass transit, spending on car leasing is also way down, 34.0 percent below its pre-pandemic level. This also saves households roughly $30 billion compared to a counterfactual where spending had maintained its pre-pandemic share.

It’s worth noting that these savings on work-related expenses are not picked up as gains to households. There simply appear in the national income accounts as less consumption, in the same way as people would have less consumption if they spent money on items they directly value, like food and shelter.

Some pandemic habits seem to be sticking, at least for now. Real spending at movie theaters is down by 48.3 percent, while spending on non-sports live entertainment is down by 29.9 percent. Spending at amusement parks was down 16.8 percent. On the other hand, real spending at sports events is up by 52.3 percent.

One big change from the pandemic is that foreign travelers, for both recreation and education, are spending much less money in the United States. Spending by foreigners is 30.2 percent below its pre-pandemic level, a drop of almost $70 billion.

Big Gainers 

Most of the areas of consumption where we have seen large gains are not surprises. Real spending on televisions is up 123.1 percent. (This is partly because the price of televisions has been falling rapidly.) Spending on streaming services is up 67.7 percent, although this is largely at the expense of cable, which has seen an 18.8 percent drop in real spending.

The gains in other categories might be a bit more surprising. Spending on recreational vehicles, like motorcycles, boats, and ATVs, is up by 33.4 percent. Spending on jewelry and watches is up 28.7 percent. Spending on books is up by 34.7 percent and spending on newspapers and periodicals is up by 60.9 percent. It seems people are spending more time reading than before the pandemic, or at least spending more money buying reading material.

Real spending on new cars and trucks is up 13.8 percent, slightly more than the overall rate of consumption growth. This increase likely would be larger if not for supply chain issues that have not yet been completely resolved.

Spending on household furnishings and appliances is up 29.9 percent. This rise is in pretty much every category from furniture to major appliances, to glassware and cooking items.

Spending on computers and software is up 113.9 percent. This is partly the flip side of the work from home story, people are getting new and better computers to deal with their work from home arrangements. But, it is also partly recreational, as people get better computers and software to play video games or watch streaming services.

Housing and Medical Care

Two huge components of consumption, where the trends may be somewhat surprising, are housing and medical care. Real spending on housing is up by just 5.2 percent from the pre-pandemic level. This is surprising, since the huge increase in the number of people working from home has undoubtedly increased the demand for housing.

However, it does take time to increase the housing stock. That would be the case even in normal times, but it was especially true during the pandemic when supply chain problems created a huge backlog in the construction sector. Even though the number of housing starts has fallen by close to 30 percent since the Fed started hiking rates last year, the number of housing units under construction is actually higher than in March of 2022.

The result of this excess demand for housing was predictably a large increase in housing prices. Nominal spending on housing is up 26.1 percent from the pre-pandemic level.

There is evidence that the housing situation is improving. The rate of increase in rents for marketed units has fallen sharply since last fall. Also, the vacancy rate has risen substantially in the last two quarters, suggesting that landlords may have less market power. In addition, the rate of completion is above its pandemic level, which means that more new units will be coming on the market in the months ahead.

The other big surprise is the sharp slowing in spending on health care services, by far the largest component of health care spending. Real spending is up just 9.8 percent, somewhat less than the 10.8 percent increase in real consumption spending since the start of the pandemic.

Since most people probably don’t distinguish between their real spending on health care services and actual spending on health care, it is useful to look at the latter in nominal terms. Nominal spending on health care services is up 21.3 percent since the fourth quarter of 2019, while nominal consumption spending overall has risen by 28.3 percent. This means that health care spending on health care services has actually been falling as a share of total consumption.

Part of this slowing is a bad story. The people who died as a result of the pandemic were on average less healthy than the population as a whole. Since these people tended to need more health care services, their death led to reduced spending.

However, part of the slowdown is a more positive story. The pandemic opened the door to more efficient ways to provide health care. In particular, there has been a massive increase in the use of telemedicine. A survey by the Department of Health and Human Services last year found that one in four people reported a remote visit with a health care professional in the prior month. Since most people do not see a health care professional in most months, this implies that a very high share of consultations were being down remotely.

There also has been a large increase in purchases of therapeutic medical equipment, which were up 37.2 percent from before the pandemic. This means that many people may have been able to get tests and treatments at home, without going to visit a doctor’s office or other medical facility.

It will take some time before we can know whether this change leads to a deterioration in the quality of care, but it clearly is a gain if a patient doesn’t have to travel to get medical care. This is especially the case when they are in poor health. Anyhow, the savings on health care costs will clearly be a huge gain for the country if they are not associated with a deterioration in the quality of care.

The Mix of Consumption Looks Pretty Good

We keep hearing from the media that people think the economy is awful, but is hard to see this in the consumption data. Overall consumption has grown at a slightly above trend pace since the start of the pandemic. Many of the items that have seen the strongest growth, such as jewelry and recreational vehicles would fit in the luxury category, or at least be seen as non-essential purchases.

A reduction in work-related expenses due to the increase in people working remotely has meant large savings for tens of millions of households. In addition, slower growth in health care costs has also freed up money for other items.

While it is always possible with aggregate data that the numbers are driven by a relatively small group of wealthy people. That seems unlikely here. We know the largest wage gains since the pandemic have been at the bottom of the wage distribution.

Also, the increase in consumption comes in too many areas to be plausibly explained by just the rich buying more. Real spending on restaurants has risen by 12.8 percent since the pandemic. It is not plausible that the wealthy could have increased their restaurants meals by enough to drive this sort of aggregate increase. This rise has to reflect the fact that a broad segment of the population feels better able to afford restaurant meals than before the pandemic.

Again, if people feel they are doing poorly in today’s economy, we can’t tell them they are wrong to feel the way they do. We can say that, based on the consumption data, it doesn’t look like they are doing poorly.

This first appeared on Dean Baker’s Beat the Press blog.  


Dean Baker

Dean Baker is the co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR). 
He is the author of Plunder and Blunder: The Rise and Fall of the Bubble Economy.