Friday, August 25, 2023

Tech Breakthrough Makes $2.5 Trillion Hydrogen Boom Possible

Editor OilPrice.com
Thu, August 24, 2023

The U.S. government has announced a proposed $7 billion (for starters) on desperately needed breakthroughs in clean hydrogen production.

The Department of Energy’s (DoE) biggest bet is on nuclear power plants, which they are hoping to convert into North America’s premier clean hydrogen producers.

Those billions of dollars are being poured into technological innovation, lowering costs and scaling up the production of clean hydrogen, including through the use of nuclear power plants in New York, Ohio, Minnesota and Arizona.

For now, the majority of hydrogen in the United States is produced by natural gas reforming in large central plants—an important step in the energy transition. The end goal, however, is to produce hydrogen without creating carbon emissions, and that’s what the federal government’s $ 7 billion spend is all about.

At four nuclear plants across the country, scientists are trying to perfect a process called “electrolysis” to create pure, clean hydrogen. The process involves splitting water into pure hydrogen and oxygen using high temperature electrolyzers. For now, however, the process is prohibitively expensive and energy intensive.

That could make this recent breakthrough all the more significant …

GH Power has developed a unique renewable energy technology that uses exothermic reactions to create three highly sought-after green outputs: hydrogen, alumina (aluminum oxide) and exothermic heat, killing three birds with one high-tech stone.

The hydrogen produced by the modular version of GH Power’s 2MW reactor is pure and clean, with zero emissions, zero carbon and zero waste, using only 2 inputs (recycled aluminum and water).

GH Power has been developing the new type of reaction for hydrogen production over the past 7 years, and now it’s gearing up to flip the switch on the first commercial reactor of its kind in Hamilton Ontario, Canada.

Flipping the switch on this new reactor comes at a critical juncture in the global energy transition. The Hydrogen Council estimates that hydrogen will represent 18% of all energy delivered to end users by 2050, avoiding 6 gigatonnes of carbon emissions annually and turning around an approximated $2.5 trillion in annual sales (not to mention creating 30 million jobs globally).

VISUALIZING A FUTURE POWERED BY CLEAN HYDROGEN

GH Power’s reactor is self-sustaining, zero emission and is a net producer of energy for consumption. It’s 100% clean and modular, which means it can be assembled on site to power North America’s industries for the first time with clean energy and cost competitive with conventional fossil fuels.


It also produces green hydrogen, exothermic heat, as well as highly valuable green alumina, which has numerous commercial applications used for everything from lithium-ion batteries and LED lighting to semiconductor production.

The GH Power process is proprietary and breakthrough:



GH Power is planning to develop a plant which produces 11,700 Tonnes of green hydrogen per year to fuel 30 MW combined cycle plant with a net output of 27 MW.


For now, the DoE puts the cost of producing hydrogen from renewable energy at about $5 per kilogram, which is about 3X higher than the price of producing hydrogen from natural gas. The DoE’s goal is to see clean hydrogen production costs decline by 80% to $1 per kilogram in a decade.

By the company’s estimates, GH Power’s reactor is already 60% cheaper than producing hydrogen by electrolysis, and it is a net producer of electricity to the grid. Its green alumina co-product production costs are also over 85% cheaper than the most commonly used processes currently used for alumina production that rely on hydrochloric acid leaching and hydrolysis for alumina production. This could be a game changer in the decarbonization of the critical sector.

Finally, GH Power’s base 27MW net output plant design is forecast to produce a carbon offset of 1.2 million tonnes annually (based on displacing a coal-fired plant the same size)

The company has also had successful tests using scrap steel (iron) as another metal fuel for hydrogen generation. The use of recycled metals provides a scalable solution with a much lower costs basis at under a $1/kg hydrogen. Scrap iron is the most widely available metal fuel in most markets.


Not only is this a cost breakthrough, but it is a proprietary technology that embraces the idea of a circular economy with zero emissions.

The process uses recycled scrap aluminum as the key input. That aluminum is then mixed with water through a proprietary reactor designed to continuously operate to produce hydrogen, alumina and exothermic heat (power) with zero emissions.

Scrap or recycled aluminum is widely available in almost every market, and can be found for as little as $1.50/kg.

It’s a new technology that can run full circle from using recyclable materials to help other companies, organizations, and industries to meet their own net-zero commitments. And it’s all modular and brings the energy to within the last mile of the energy user. For hydrogen, it could be a huge competitive advantage to be able to build a plant right where it’s needed, without massive hydrogen storage facilities and without transportation needs.

FLIPPING THE SWITCH ON THE FIRST REACTOR

GH Power and its team of engineers have already completed Phase 1 testing of their 2MW reactor in Hamilton, Ontario, and Phase 2 testing began on June 30th.




Next step is to move into commercial operations and 24-hour continuous operations.


Revenue generation is forecast to begin in the fourth quarter, and then the future is all about scaling up from 2MW reactors to a 27MW Net Output power solution.

The scaled-up 27 Net Output MW version of this reactor, planned for the near future, will produce the same three green outputs which can be blended with natural gas in a turbine. This could allow GH Power’s solution to integrate with existing natural gas power plants and allow companies to utilize existing assets while making a serious reduction in CO2 emissions.

The world needs 520 million tonnes of hydrogen to achieve net-zero targets by 2050, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA). Given the current state of advancement with electrolysis for producing hydrogen and the associated costs, we won’t make that goal without alternative breakthroughs such as GH Power’s. And because this new reactor aims to produce three green outputs, the contributions to zero-emissions goals should be compounded far beyond the individual numbers.

This award-winning technology is the result of seven years of painstaking research by world-class scientists and engineers, led by GH Power CEO Dave White, a veteran engineer in the power generation space. Combined, the GH Power team has, has well over a century of power generation experience in the design, build and operation of power plants, refineries, and other energy infrastructure.

Chief Engineer Ken Stewart has been designing and managing thermal power plant and petrochemical processes for over four decades and across eight different power plants in North America. COO Gary Grahn brings to the table 25 years of international energy experience, including in oil, gas, minerals, metals and utilities, and CFO Anand Patel contributes a decade of real asset capital markets experience, with over $4 billion in completed transactions, including for renewable energy giant Brookfield Asset Management. Finally, project development director Mike Miller offers more than 35 years of experience infrastructure, private equity and development for top companies along the energy supply chain, such as giant NextEra Energy.

GH Power has been working closely with Carleton University and is the recipient of a $2.2-million grant from a joint German-Canadian government program as part of Canada’s alliance with Germany to bolster its hydrogen strategy. It’s a feather in Canada’s cap as the country seeks to become a top global supplier of clean hydrogen with a transatlantic supply chain.

The idea itself is in line with what world-renowned physicist Neil de Grasse Tyson calls the ‘cosmic perspective.’ Large-scale green hydrogen projects in existence today are only as clean as the energy required to produce them and only as plausible as the cost required to get to the end game. “The only practical solution for society to reduce carbon emissions is to transition from 100% fossil fuels to cleaner tech,” and one of the steps in tackling this is to blend cost-competitive green hydrogen with fossil fuels and ramp up the hydrogen content whenever possible,” noted Dave White, GH Power CEO.

Ballard Power Systems Inc. (NASDAQ:BLDP) has firmly established its presence in the vanguard of the fuel cell revolution. Their pioneering proton exchange membrane (PEM) technology is powering various transportation sectors, ranging from buses to trains. This makes Ballard not just a producer, but an influencer, guiding the green transit narrative globally.

For investors, the scope of Ballard's influence translates into potential growth. With the increasing emphasis on sustainable energy and cleaner modes of transportation, Ballard’s technology is likely to see an uptick in demand.

The broader vision of Ballard is shaping the industry's future trajectory. Investors looking to align with a forward-looking company would find Ballard’s approach and ethos resonating with global sustainability goals.

FuelCell Energy Inc. (NASDAQ:FCEL) stands out as a force of change in the stationary fuel cell power plant market. Their focus on distributed power generation means they're addressing the critical need for decentralized, efficient energy sources.

Their products are engineered with a balance of commercial viability and environmental responsibility. This dual approach makes their solutions attractive in a market that demands both profitability and sustainability.

For investors, FuelCell Energy presents an opportunity that's grounded in present needs and future potential. Their dedication to curbing emissions while improving energy efficiency aligns with global shifts, promising potential returns and impact.

Bloom Energy Corporation (NYSE:BE) is redefining the fuel cell landscape with their innovative solid oxide fuel cells. Designed for on-site electricity generation, their products aim to tackle inefficiencies associated with centralized energy distribution.

This vision of decentralized power generation is crucial in an era where energy security and efficiency are paramount. By providing businesses and communities control over their power sources, Bloom offers a solution that's both innovative and timely.

Bloom represents more than just a tech company. It's a glimpse into the future of energy. Their relentless focus on technological advancement and market responsiveness makes them a promising contender in the renewable energy sector.

Plug Power Inc. (NASDAQ:PLUG) innovative hydrogen fuel cell systems are carving a new path in the green energy sector. Their solutions, aimed at replacing conventional batteries, mark a transformative shift in energy storage and application.

Their ambition reaches beyond mere product development. With a mission to redesign the energy value chain, they're reimagining how industries approach power and sustainability. This comprehensive vision indicates a long-term strategic plan, appealing to forward-thinking investors.

The commitment Plug Power demonstrates toward a sustainable energy future makes it a critical player in the hydrogen space. As industries transition, investors can anticipate a rising demand for Plug Power’s trailblazing solutions.

Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (NYSE:APD) isn't new to the industrial gas scene. Yet, their dive into the hydrogen sector is indicative of their ability to innovate and adapt. By creating integrated hydrogen systems, they're looking at the bigger picture of a sustainable energy ecosystem.

Their vast experience gives them an edge. Not many companies can claim expertise in both production and distribution. With hydrogen poised to be a key player in future energy scenarios, their end-to-end solutions offer reliability and scalability.

Air Products and Chemicals presents a compelling narrative in the hydrogen story. Backing a company with both heritage and foresight can be a lucrative move, especially when the global momentum is tilting towards hydrogen.

Linde plc (NYSE:LIN), with its extensive history in the industrial gas domain, is making commendable strides in the hydrogen space. Their approach is holistic, focusing on every aspect from production to infrastructure, underscoring a commitment that feels both deep and genuine.

Their existing global footprint offers them an advantage. They're not just producing hydrogen; they're setting up infrastructure, partnering on projects, and engaging in R&D to push the envelope further.

Linde offers stability and innovation in equal measure for investors. Their vast experience combined with a proactive approach to the hydrogen revolution paints a picture of steady growth and visionary leadership.

Cummins Inc. (NYSE:CMI) might be renowned for its engines and power solutions, but its foray into hydrogen showcases adaptability and vision. They're not just adding a new product line; they're rethinking the future of transportation and power.

Their blended approach is their strength. By marrying their traditional product offerings with innovative hydrogen solutions, they're setting themselves up as a one-stop-shop for energy needs across the board.

Investors eyeing Cummins will see a legacy brand that's refusing to rest on its laurels. Instead, Cummins is evolving, making it an attractive proposition for those looking for both stability and growth potential.

Shell's (NYSE:SHEL) transition narrative is both fascinating and instructive. Moving from a traditional oil major to a diversified energy company, their hydrogen initiatives reflect a broader shift towards sustainability and innovation.

Their projects in the hydrogen domain, from refueling stations to research collaborations, indicate a comprehensive and future-ready strategy. Shell's pivot towards hydrogen is not an afterthought; it's an integral part of their future roadmap.

For investors, Shell offers a dual advantage. The stability and robustness of an established energy giant, combined with the agility and foresight of a green tech firm, make it an enticing option in a volatile energy market.

BP's (NYSE:BP) rebranding from 'British Petroleum' to 'Beyond Petroleum' is symbolic of its evolution. Once a stalwart of the traditional energy sector, it's now championing the green energy revolution, with hydrogen being a key focus.

Their endeavors in hydrogen, be it through investments or partnerships, showcase a progressive mindset. By positioning hydrogen as a cornerstone of their future growth strategy, they're aligning with global sustainability goals.

Investors considering BP are not just looking at an energy company; they're looking at a future-focused entity that’s reinventing itself. Their commitment to hydrogen signals long-term growth potential and a readiness to shape the energy landscape of tomorrow.

By. James Stafford



Elon Musk stopped policing political misinformation. The tech industry followed.

Naomi Nix and Sarah Ellison, 
The Washington Post
Fri, August 25, 2023 



Social media companies are receding from their role as watchdogs against political misinformation, abandoning their most aggressive efforts to police online falsehoods in a trend expected to profoundly affect the 2024 presidential election.

An array of circumstances is fueling the retreat: Mass layoffs at Meta and other major tech companies have gutted teams dedicated to promoting accurate information online. An aggressive legal battle over claims that the Biden administration pressured social media platforms to silence certain speech has blocked a key path to detecting election interference.

And X CEO Elon Musk has reset industry standards, rolling back strict rules against misinformation on the site formerly known as Twitter. In a sign of Musk's influence, Meta briefly considered a plan last year to ban all political advertising on Facebook. The company shelved it after Musk announced plans to transform rival Twitter into a haven for free speech, according to two people familiar with the plans who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe sensitive matters.

The retrenchment comes just months ahead of the 2024 primaries, as GOP front-runner Donald Trump continues to rally supporters with false claims that election fraud drove his 2020 loss to President Biden. Multiple investigations into the election have revealed no evidence of fraud, and Trump now faces federal criminal charges connected to his efforts to overturn the election. Still, YouTube, X and Meta have stopped labeling or removing posts that repeat Trump's claims, even as voters increasingly get their news on social media.

Trump capitalized on those relaxed standards in his recent interview with former Fox News host Tucker Carlson, hosted by X. The former president punctuated the conversation, which streamed Wednesday night during the first Republican primary debate of the 2024 campaign, with false claims that the 2020 election was "rigged" and that the Democrats had "cheated" in order to elect President Biden.

On Thursday night, Trump posted on X for the first time since he was kicked off the site, then known as Twitter, following the Jan. 6, 2021, assault on the U.S. Capitol. Musk reinstated his account in November. The former president posted his mug shot from Fulton County, Ga., where he was booked Thursday on charges connected to his efforts to overturn the 2020 election. "NEVER SURRENDER!" read the caption.

The evolution of the companies' practices was described by more than a dozen current and former employees, many of them speaking on the condition of anonymity to offer sensitive details. The new approach marks a sharp shift from the 2020 election, when social media companies expanded their efforts to police disinformation. The companies feared a repeat of 2016, when Russian trolls attempted to interfere in the U.S. presidential campaign, turning the platforms into tools of political manipulation and division.

These pared-down commitments emerge as covert influence campaigns from Russia and China have grown more aggressive, and advances in generative artificial intelligence have created new tools for misleading voters.

Experts in disinformation say the dynamic headed into 2024 calls for more aggressive efforts to combat it, not less.

"Musk has taken the bar and put it on the floor," said Emily Bell, a professor at the Tow Center for Digital Journalism at Columbia University, where she studies the relationship between tech platforms and news publishers. For the 2024 presidential election, misinformation around races is "going to be even worse," she added.

The social media platforms say they still have tools to prevent the spread of misinformation.

"We remove content that misleads voters on how to vote or encourages interference in the democratic process," YouTube spokesperson Ivy Choi said in a statement. "Additionally, we connect people to authoritative election news and information through recommendations and information panels."

Meta spokeswoman Erin McPike said in a statement that "protecting the U.S. 2024 elections is one of our top priorities, and our integrity efforts continue to lead the industry."

Yet it is already changing what some users see online. Earlier this month, the founder of a musical cruise company posted a screenshot on Facebook appearing to show Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker (D) falsely signing a bill that would allow undocumented immigrants to become police officers and sheriff's deputies. "In Illinois American citizens will be arrested by illegals," reads the post, which has been shared more than 26o times.

Fact-checkers at USA Today, one of dozens of media organizations Meta pays to debunk viral conspiracies, deemed the post false, and the company labeled it on Facebook as "false information." But Meta has quietly begun offering users new controls to opt out of the fact-checking program, allowing debunked posts such as the falsified one about Pritzker to spread in participants' news-feeds with a warning label. Conservatives have long criticized Meta's fact-checking system, arguing it is biased against them.

Meta Global Affairs President Nick Clegg said the ability to opt out represents a new direction that empowers users and eases scrutiny over the company. "We feel we've moved quite dramatically in favor of giving users greater control over even quite controversial sensitive content," Clegg said. McPike added that the new fact-checking policy comes "in response to users telling us that they want a greater ability to decide what they see."

YouTube has also backed away from policing misleading claims, announcing in June it would no longer remove videos falsely saying the 2020 presidential election was stolen from Trump. Continuing to enforce the ban would curtail political speech without "meaningfully reducing the risk of violence or other real-world harm," the company argued in a blog post.

These shifts are a reaction from social media executives to being battered by contentious battles over content and concluding there is "no winning," said Katie Harbath, former director of public policy at Facebook, where she managed the global elections strategy across the company.

"For Democrats, we weren't taking down enough, and for Republicans we were taking down too much," she said. The result was an overall sense that "after doing all this, we're still getting yelled at . . . It's just not worth it anymore."

- - -

The 'big lie' test

For years, many of Meta's trust and safety teams operated like a university. Driven by curiosity, employees were encouraged to seek out the thorniest problems on the platform - issues such as fraud, abuse, bias and attempts at voter suppression - and develop systems to help.

But in the last year and a half, some workers say there has been a shift away from that proactive stance. Instead, they are now asked to spend more of their time figuring out how to minimally comply with a booming list of global regulations, according to four current and former employees.

That's a departure from the approach tech companies took after Russia manipulated social media to attempt to swing the 2016 election to Trump. The incident transformed Mark Zuckerberg into a symbol of corporate recklessness. So the Meta CEO vowed to do better.

He embarked on a public contrition tour and vowed to devote the company's seemingly infinite resources to protecting democracy. "The most important thing I care about right now is making sure no one interferes with the various . . . elections around the world," Zuckerberg told two Senate committees in 2018, the same year a Wired cover depicted him with a bruised and bloody face.

In the run-up to the 2020 presidential election, social media companies ramped up investigative teams to quash foreign influence campaigns and paid thousands of content moderators to debunk viral conspiracies. Ahead of the 2018 midterms, Meta gave reporters tours of its so-called "war room," where employees monitored violent threats in real-time.

Civil rights groups pressured the platforms - including in meetings with Zuckerberg and Meta COO Sheryl Sandberg - to bolster their election policies, arguing the pandemic and popularity of mail-in ballots created an opening for bad actors to confuse voters about the electoral process.

"These platforms were making all sorts of commitments to content moderation and to racial justice and civil rights in general," said Color of Change President Rashad Robinson, whose racial justice group helped organize an advertising boycott by more than 1,000 companies including Coca-Cola, The North Face and Verizon following the police murder of George Floyd.

They instituted strict rules against posts that might lead to voter suppression. As Trump questioned the validity of mail-in ballots in 2020, Facebook and Twitter took the unprecedented step of attaching information labels such as, "This claim about election fraud is disputed" to scores of misleading comments. Google restricted election-related ads and touted its work with government agencies, including the FBI's Foreign Influence Task Force, to prevent election interference campaigns.

In early January 2021, rioters incited by Trump assaulted the U.S. Capitol after organizing themselves, in part, on Facebook and Twitter. In response, Meta, Twitter, Google and other tech companies suspended Trump, forcibly removing the president from their platforms.

The moment was the peak of social media companies' confrontation with political misinformation.

But as the tech giants grappled with narrowing profits, this proactive stance began to dissolve.

In the summer of 2021, Meta's Clegg embarked on a campaign to convince Zuckerberg and the company's board members to end all political advertising on its social media networks - a policy already in place at Twitter. Meta's decision not to fact-check politicians' speech had triggered years of controversy, with activists accusing the company of profiting off the misinformation contained in some campaign ads. Clegg argued the ads caused Meta more political trouble than they were worth.

While Zuckerberg and other board members were skeptical, the company eventually warmed to the idea. Meta even planned to announce the new policy, according to two people.

By July 2022, the proposal had been shelved indefinitely. Internal momentum to impose the new rule seemed to plummet after Musk boasted of his plans to turn Twitter into a safe haven for "free speech" - a principle Zuckerberg and some board members had always lauded, one of the people said.

After Musk's official takeover later that fall, Twitter would eventually rescind its own ban against political ads.

"Elon's position on that stuff definitely shifted the way the board and industry thought about [policy]," said one person who was briefed on the board discussions about the ad ban at Meta. "He came in and kinda blew it all up."

- - -

The Musk factor

Almost immediately, Musk's reign at Twitter forced his peers to rethink other industry standards.

On his first night as owner, Musk fired Trust and Safety head Vijaya Gadde, whose job it was to guard the companies' users against fraud, harassment and offensive content. Soon after, just days before the midterms, the company laid off more than half of its 7,500 workers, crippling the teams responsible for making high-stake decisions about what to do about falsehoods.

The cuts and the evolving approach to moderating toxic content prompted advertisers to flee. But while advertisers were leaving, other tech companies were paying close attention to Musk's moves.

In a June interview with the right-leaning tech podcast host Lex Fridman, Zuckerberg said Musk's decision to make drastic cuts to Twitter's workforce - including by cutting non-engineers who worked on things such as public policy but didn't build products - encouraged other tech leaders such as himself to consider making similar changes.

"It was probably good for the industry that he made those changes," Zuckerberg said. (Meta has since laid off more than 20,000 workers, part of an industry-wide trend.)

Musk reinstated high-profile conservative Twitter accounts, including Jordan Peterson, a professor who was banned from Twitter for misgendering a trans person, and the Babylon Bee, a conservative media company. Musk also brought back Republican politicians including Trump and Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (Ga.), whose personal account was banned for violating the platform's covid-19 misinformation policies. He simultaneously suspended the accounts of journalists including Washington Post reporter Drew Harwell, CNN reporter Donie O'Sullivan and others who reported on Musk.

A spike in hate speech on the site followed as users tested boundaries.

The political winds facing Silicon Valley were shifting, too. Trump's 2020 election rigging claims had inspired a slew of Republican candidates to echo his rhetoric, cementing election denialism as a core Republican talking point. In a May poll by CNN, 6 in 10 Republican voters said they believed Trump's falsehoods that the 2020 election was rigged.

Soon after Musk's Twitter acquisition, scores of Republican candidates and right-wing influencers tested Meta, Twitter and other social media platforms' resolve to fight election misinformation. In the months leading up to the midterms, far-right personalities and GOP candidates continued to spread election denialism on social media virtually unchecked.

Mark Finchem, the Republican candidate seeking to oversee Arizona's election system as the state's secretary of state, made a fundraising pitch on the eve of the 2022 election, falsely arguing on Facebook and Twitter that his Democratic opponent, Adrian Fontes, was a member of the Chinese Communist Party and a "cartel criminal" who had "rigged elections" before.

When Twitter, seemingly in response to journalists' questions, appeared to restrict his account, Musk declared he was "looking into" complaints that Finchem was being censored. Later that evening, Finchem was back to tweeting his message. He thanked Musk "for stopping the commie who suspended me from Twitter a week before the election."

Last year, Meta dissolved the responsible innovation team, a small group that evaluated the potential risks of some of Meta's products, according to a person familiar with the matter, and simultaneously shuttered the much-touted Facebook Journalism Project, which was designed to promote quality information on the platform.

"What was once promoted as part of an essential component of Meta's role in helping secure democracy, election integrity and a healthy information ecosystem, appears now to have been expendable," said Jim Friedlich, executive director of the Lenfest Institute for Journalism, which served for two years as a lead partner in helping execute Facebook's journalism grantmaking.

Now, Meta is eyeing ways to cut down on having to referee controversial political content on its new Twitter-like social media app, Threads. Instagram head Adam Mosseri, who led efforts to build Threads, said earlier this year that the platform would not actively "encourage" politics and "hard news," because the extra user engagement is not worth the scrutiny.

But even as it tries to retreat from the political culture wars, there's no hiding from the coming election.

Soon after the company launched Threads, Meta started warning users who tried to follow Donald Trump Jr. on the new social network that his account has repeatedly posted false information reviewed by independent fact-checkers. Trump Jr. posted a screenshot of the message on rival Twitter, complaining that "Threads not exactly off to a great start."

A Meta spokesperson responded by saying, "This was an error and shouldn't have happened. It's been fixed."

After the incident was over, Clegg told the Post he hopes in the future such politically fraught debates will disappear.

"I hope over time we'll have less of a discussion about what our big, crude algorithmic choices are and more about whether you guys feel that the individual controls we're giving you on Threads feel meaningful to you," he said.

USWNT drops to lowest FIFA world ranking ever after early World Cup exit

Tyler Greenawalt
·Staff writer
Fri, August 25, 2023 

The USWNT lost in the Round of 16 to Sweden in the 2023 Women's World Cup. (AP Photo/Hamish Blair)

For the first time since 2017, the United States women's national soccer team is not ranked No. 1 in the world.

The USWNT dropped all the way to No. 3 in FIFA's world ranking after Sweden knocked the U.S. out of the 2023 World Cup in the Round of 16. It's the lowest ranking for the U.S. since FIFA introduced its ranking system for the women's game in 2003.

Sweden jumped up two spots to No. 1 after a third-place finish at the tournament, while World Cup champion Spain is No. 2 after moving up four spots. England, the tournament runner-up, remained No. 4 ahead of France, Germany and the Netherlands. The Germans dropped four spots from No. 2 after their elimination in the group stage.

Before moving to No. 1 in 2017, the United States was ranked No. 2. The U.S. has occupied the top spot in the FIFA women's rankings for a total of 13 years.

This year's Round of 16 exit was the worst World Cup finish for the U.S. The USWNT won back-to-back World Cups in 2015 and 2019 but dealt with injury issues and poor coaching in 2023. The team looked sloppy during its group-stage matches and barely even advanced to the next round to face Sweden.

Not long after the loss, USWNT manager Vlatko Andonovski stepped down after four years.

The FIFA ranking is also indicative of a growing sentiment within the soccer world that Spain and England — not the United States — are the new "gold standard" for women playing the sport. But even still, the USWNT set an incredible legacy for the sport in the United States, even though some of it came with a bit of domestic vitriol.

But it's not like the team is without talent. Sophia Smith is a great offensive player, Trinity Rodman looked like a rising star and Naomi Girma played wonderfully on defense. The U.S. will have four years to figure things out before the 2027 World Cup — more than enough time to right the ship. It just won't be alone anymore with Spain, England and Sweden all jockeying for supremacy.

Rising temperatures pose very specific threat to tropical rainforests. What a new report shows.

Sara Chernikoff, USA TODAY
Thu, August 24, 2023 






Tropical forests ranging from South America to South East Asia face a new threat; leaves may not be able to photosynthesize when their temperature gets too hot. Without this essential process, the world’s forests face threatening potential consequences, according to a recent report published in Nature.

A group of scientists from the U.S., United Kingdom, Brazil, France and Australia found that photosynthesis begins to fail when leaves’ temperatures reach 116 Fahrenheit. Although this temperature seems steep, leaves can heat up much more than the air temperature, according to the report.

Tropical forests play an essential role in sustaining life and regulating the global climate. They are home to half of all species found on land.

During photosynthesis, plants use sunlight, water and carbon dioxide to create oxygen and energy. Most life on earth depends on photosynthesis. It is the number one source of oxygen in the atmosphere and forms the base of Earth’s food web.

Here’s what the report found

The report found that 0.01% of leaves are passing the critical temperature threshold, meaning their ability to photosynthesize fails. Although this percentage is small, it’s expected to increase as temperatures continue to climb due to global warming.

Tropical forests can handle about 7.2 degrees Fahrenheit of increased temperatures before they reach a turning point.

If warming exceeds this threshold, the percentage of leaves passing the critical temperature threshold could rise to 1.4%. This could potentially cause major leaf loss and death to the entire tree.

Largest U.S. women's group makes early Biden endorsement, citing abortion rights threats

Reuters
Fri, August 25, 2023 

FILE PHOTO: FILE PHOTO: U.S. Supreme Court overturns the landmark Roe v Wade abortion decision

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The largest U.S. women's group on Friday endorsed President Joe Biden's re-election bid, pledging to use its resources to mobilize voters and drive turnout in 2024.

The political action committee for the National Organization for Women (NOW) offered its earliest-ever endorsement for a presidential re-election campaign, saying women's rights are under attack and the issue of abortion will be on the ballot. The group's last endorsement for the same candidate in a presidential re-election campaign landed for President Barack Obama in July 2012, four months ahead of the elections in November.

The Biden administration is "the firewall against these horrible attempts to roll back our basic rights to abortion, contraception, and healthcare access, to LGBTQ+ protection, to pay parity, and equity," said Christian Nunes, national president of the group.

"We are organizing in every city and town and everywhere in between, across the country to mobilize and turn out voters," she said, referring to the work being done by the group's 100,000 members and supporters.

In June, Biden also won the endorsement of three major U.S. reproductive rights groups — Planned Parenthood Action Fund, NARAL Pro-Choice America and EMILY's List.

The endorsements from women's groups and reproductive rights groups for Biden are not surprising but they highlight how abortion rights remains a hot-button issue in the presidential election and how essential the president's abortion rights agenda will be for his re-election bid.

Turning out women voters in 2024 is also crucial for the Biden campaign. A report from Pew Research in 2021 found Biden made gains with men but his share of women voters remained identical to the support Hillary Clinton had in 2016.

Biden campaign manager Julie Chavez Rodriguez said Republicans on the debate stage in Milwaukee on Wednesday "proudly proclaimed their support for stripping women of their rights by banning abortion nationwide."

Most of the Republican presidential candidates have said they would support some type of federal law restricting when abortions would be legal.

"With NOW's massive grassroots organizing resources and leadership, we will mobilize women in historic numbers to re-elect" Biden and Harris, Chavez Rodriguez said.

Nunes said the group will continue coordinating with reproductive rights groups and the Biden campaign to make sure "they are in alignment with the messaging that needs

(Reporting by Nandita Bose in Washington)

U$A
We can't pay': A growing wave of student loan borrowers are likely to refuse to resume repayment in October, new survey shows — here’s why many are on the brink of boycott



Vishesh Raisinghani
Fri, August 25, 2023

As President Joe Biden’s stalled student loan forgiveness plan means repayment is set to resume on Oct. 1, a growing number of student loan borrowers are claiming they either cannot or will not pay the debt back.

In fact, a new survey from student and education research publication Intelligent.com revealed that 62% of respondents said they are considering boycotting loan payments in the fall as almost half of them doubt they will be able to afford those payments.

Twenty-nine-year-old Shahem Mclaurin took to TikTok to ask hard questions about whether borrowers like him should protest what many view as systemic unfairness by refusing to pay back their loans.

“Are we not paying — like collectively, as a whole,” he said in the viral video, “meaning if you put a payment down you are breaking, you’re crossing the line?”

“How are we going to move? Because they can’t keep getting away with this stuff … if we don’t pay, they are the ones who are going to suffer, not us.”

Half of the survey respondents believe a boycott could lead to total debt forgiveness.

Here are the risks involved in refusing to repay student loans and why so many borrowers might just do it anyway.
Millions face growing debt obligations

Millions of Americans collectively owe $1.6 trillion in student loans, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. And borrowers under age 40 owe 55% of that total debt, according to the Education Data Initiative

“Millennials like me have gone through so many economic crises and watched these corporations and banks get bailed out,” said Amanda Acevedo, a 37-year-old radiographer from Orlando, in a recent interview with Bloomberg. “Meanwhile, we can’t pay the student loans we were told we needed for success.”

Acevedo used the loan repayment pause to save up for a down payment on a house. Now the mother of three is expected to pay back $412 every month towards her student loans.

The Education Data initiative also reported that the average federal student loan borrower has $37,338 outstanding, and the average private debt is $54,921 per borrower.

Meanwhile, many borrowers are generally in worse shape to repay these loans than before the start of the temporary repayment pause, which the Department of Education implemented in 2020 in the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Since then, amid a high cost of living and rising interest rates, borrowers have built up other forms of increasingly costly debt, such as mortgages, auto loans and personal loans.

Last year, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) identified five risk factors that could lead to student loan borrowers struggling to repay their debt to the point of debt delinquency — and one of those factors is the rate of delinquency on non-student debt since the start of the pandemic.

According to a June CFPB report, about 2.5 million student loan borrowers had at least one delinquent non-student loan as of March of this year, an increase of around 200,000 borrowers since September 2022.

For those likely to resume student loan repayment, the median monthly payments on these non-student debt obligations have increased by 24%. Younger borrowers were hit especially hard as they saw a 252% increase in their median monthly payments, from $65 to $229.

Read more: A California nurse went viral showing how she paid off her student loans by 27 while making up to $500K a year — here are 5 ways to build wealth without a wild salary
Possible consequences for not resuming repayment

Borrowers who choose to participate in a protest or otherwise fail to make payments could face severe financial consequences.

For one thing, withholding repayment could make a typical student loan much more expensive in the long run, given that the interest would eventually start to stack up.

In some circumstances, lenders can even garnish up to 15% of the borrower’s wages to repay loans in default. And 19 states have laws that can suspend or even revoke delinquent borrowers’ professional licenses, affecting those with occupations such as firefighter, nurse, teacher, lawyer, and even barber.

The government can also withold Social Security benefits, which could impact the finances of the millions of borrowers over the age of 62 who have an average outstanding student debt of $41,778. Also, about 23% of that $1.6 trillion of total debt is held by borrowers over the age of 50
The way forward

In 2022, the Biden administration made moves to forgive up to $20,000 in student loans for most borrowers, but the Supreme Court ruled against the proposal in June.

Nevertheless, the administration appears determined to provide some relief.

Biden has now implemented a year-long leniency program that shields borrowers from the worst consequences of not repaying their student loans.

Under the plan, borrowers will have some breathing room. Those who fail to make repayments from Oct. 1, 2023, to Sept. 30, 2024, won’t be placed in default or considered delinquent by credit bureaus.

Private loan borrowers might have the option to refinance their loans ahead of repayment restart in October.

For those with government loans, the Biden administration has also created the Saving on a Valuable Education (SAVE) plan, which offers borrowers reduced monthly payments — calculated according to their income and family size — and prevents unpaid interest from increasing loan balances.

The measures could save the average borrower up to $1,000 a year, according to government estimates. Even better, some SAVE loans can be forgiven entirely after 10 years’ worth of qualifying payments.

For their part, about 71% of the Intelligent.com survey respondents say they have taken or plan to take on extra work in preparation for payments resuming.

— With files from Samantha Emann, Moneywise senior associate editor

This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
'I haven't been the same since': This TikToker was shocked to discover that Buc-ee's pays its janitors the same wage as her desk job — here's why the demand for blue-collar work is soaring

Vishesh Raisinghani
Thu, August 24, 2023 




It’s been, if you will, a case of managing dismay ever since TikTok user Roxie Abernathy learned that a Buc-ee’s gas station apparently pays its restroom janitors the same hourly wage she earns as a case manager.

“I haven’t been the same since,” she says in a video that has garnered nearly a million views.

“Operating the car wash [pays] more money than I make as a case manager.”

In a follow-up video, Abernathy pointed her followers to a photo of a Bucc-ee’s job board posting that stated 401(k) contributions would be matched up to 6% and employees would get up to three weeks of paid time off.

“No hate for these positions, but at the same time I’m still in shock over this discovery.”

It’s not just Buc-ee’s

The Buc-ee’s job board Abernathy posted revealed an average restroom crew wage comes in at $18 per hour. Meanwhile, case manager pay ranges from $13.67 to $35.49, with an average of around $22, according to Indeed.

So there’s a good chance she’s right — an experienced janitor could earn the same hourly rate as an entry-level case manager in some parts of the country.

People in the comments section weren’t surprised.

“My cousin is the GM of a location and he makes like $143k/yr. His 401(k) matching is better than my corporate job,” said one.

Another commenter said managers of the local Panda Express made more money than her, even though she was the “supervisor of social workers.”

Some blue-collar workers chimed in, too. “I’m maintenance and I make more than most of the staff at my job,” said one user. “People see us as less than because we clean toilets.”

These comments highlight a growing shift in the economy where white-collar jobs are rapidly becoming less attractive than blue-collar ones.

Read more: Here's how much money the average middle-class American household makes — how do you stack up?

White-Blue trend reversal

Tech giants have collectively cut tens of thousands of jobs in the first half of 2023. Many of these layoffs focused on white-collar positions like middle managers, accountants, software engineers and project managers.

Advances in artificial intelligence could accelerate this trend and suppress the wages of white-collar workers further. A study by OpenAI found that professional roles that require more education and were more likely to be remote were disproportionately exposed to AI disruption. At least 80% of office workers will have at least 10% of their tasks handled by AI, according to the report.

Simply put, lawyers, doctors and writers could be more likely to lose their jobs to AI.

Meanwhile, a shortage of skilled labor in the construction and trades has pushed up wages in this segment of the labor force. As this trend continues, people could realize that the pay gap between white- and blue-collar work is rapidly diminishing.

“White-collar workers may experience a recession that blue-collar workers don’t experience,” Giacomo Santangelo, an economics professor at Fordham University, told VOA. He believes cultural disdain for manual labor has created this undersupply of blue-collar workers. “We’ve gotten into this habit of saying it’s important to go to college, instead of saying it’s important to learn a skill,” Santangelo said.

The long-term social and political impact of this shift is still unclear. But so long as a place like Buc-ee’s pays its restroom crews as well as some white-collar professionals, it may be time to flush those old assumptions down the dra

 

GM Battery Plant Offers EV Workers Higher Wages After Solvent Leak

General Motors Co.

Bloomberg / Contributor / Getty Images

Union workers at Ultium Cells, a battery plant joint venture between General Motors (GM) and LG Energy Solutions, have won a "breakthrough agreement" to hike wages, the United Auto Workers union announced Thursday.

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  • The tentative agreement will raise Ultium Cells worker pay by 25% on average, though wages would remain lower than traditional UAW workers who assemble engines and cars.
  • The proposed deal was announced by Ultium Cells just one day after a chemical solvent leak; UAW has repeatedly criticized the plant's health and safety practices.
  • The battery plant, a joint venture between General Motors and LG Energy Solutions, has drawn national attention from Senators and market analysts.

The interim deal will raise hourly pay for workers at the Lordstown, Ohio plant by 25% on average, and includes back pay to December 2022 for tenured workers. The agreement will now be put to a ratification vote by Ultium workers.

The proposed agreement comes one day after a chemical solvent leak at Ultium Cells. The company announced a "cathode mixing slurry leak" on Wednesday which was resolved after a temporary production halt.1 While there were no injuries or employee exposure from the incident, UAW has repeatedly criticized the plant's health and safety practices.

GM stock slumped earlier this month after the company warned investors that EV production was slowing due to issues producing Ultium battery packs. That follows a late July tumble following second-quarter earnings over similar battery pack concerns.

The tentative deal comes after months of negotiations that drew national attention—and the ire of Democratic politicians. Ohio Democratic Senator Sherrod Brown called the plant's $16 an hour rate "poverty-level wages" and a "national disgrace" at the end of July.2 Analysts see the Ultium deal as a benchmark for battery workers' labor rights as electric vehicles become more common.3

Despite the wage hike, the proposed rate for battery workers is still lower than that of traditional UAW workers who assemble engines and cars.4 Those workers voted Friday to authorize a strike if an agreement isn't reached, which would cost the economy as much as $5.6 billion, according to one estimate.

UAW and GM's joint venture reach a tentative deal that gives battery workers a wage hike

Jamie L. LaReau, Detroit Free Press
Thu, August 24, 2023 

The United Auto Workers and Ultium Cells LLC have reached a tentative agreement on wages at the battery cell plant in northeast Ohio that would provide an immediate, across-the-board wage increase and back pay for those who qualify, if the hourly workforce ratifies it.

Ultium Cells is the joint venture owned by General Motors and battery maker LG Energy Solution. It makes battery cells for the EV batteries GM uses in its new EVs powered by the Ultium propulsion system. That includes the GMC Hummer EV, Cadillac Lyriq, Chevrolet Silverado EV and Chevrolet Blazer EV, which started shipping to dealers late last month.

In a statement released by Ultium on Thursday evening, it said the deal is still pending a membership ratification vote, which is expected to conclude on Sunday. But, if ratified, then effective Monday, all Ultium hourly employees’ wages will be increased. The average wage increase being about 25%.

There are about 1,150 union members at the plant, the UAW said, adding that the starting wage there is $16.50 an hour. This tentative agreement would push that up to a little more than $20 an hour.

The interim wage increase will be retroactive, so active current hourly employees will receive back pay for every hour worked since Dec. 23, 2022, Ultium Cells spokeswoman Katie Burdette said in a statement to the media. Any current employee who has worked since Dec. 23 can receive payment of $3,000 to $7,000, based on hours worked.

Only the first step

In December, the hourly workforce at Ultium Cells voted to unionize the plant near Lordstown, Ohio, after the union and the company spent months at odds over the organizing process.

“This agreement is a significant and meaningful step as we continue to negotiate collaboratively and in good faith with the UAW to reach a comprehensive contract," Ultium Ohio Plant Director Kareem Maine said in a statement.

Josh Ayers, UAW Local 1112 chairman, said in a statement that the interim wage increase is only the first step as the union and company continue to work on "a fair and comprehensive contract."

"The UAW Local 1112 members working at Ultium Cells deserve this increase for being essential in getting the plant up and running," Ayers said. “While an entire ‘first’ agreement is being negotiated, the committee is still hard at work in bargaining working conditions, health and safety, seniority rights, addressing other issues raised by the membership and future wage increases throughout the term of this agreement.”
Working conditions remain an issue

The fact that a tentative agreement has been reached is remarkable considering how critical UAW President Shawn Fain has been of joint ventures, which he sees as a strategy whereby a company can circumvent the union's negotiated wages and benefits in its national contract by starting a new business — the joint venture — with a new workforce.

Utlium Cell's wages and working conditions have been contentious during negotiations. The bargaining team traveled to Washington, D.C., earlier this summer to talk to policymakers "about issues such as exposure to chemicals that are not yet regulated by OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) and how employees are getting sick and passing out," Fain said during a Facebook Live presentation earlier this summer.

UAW President Shawn Fain greets dozens of union members during a rally and practice picket near the Detroit Assembly Complex - Mack in Detroit on Wednesday, Aug. 23, 2023.

He has advocated pulling that workforce into the national agreement the union has with GM, Ford Motor Co. and Stellantis so that hourly workers at Ultium Cells get similar pay and benefits. A spokesman for the UAW said Fain's position has not changed in that he continues to seek agreements with battery makers that are on par with the national agreement in terms of pay, safety and other benefits.

The UAW is renegotiating its national contract that covers some 150,000 UAW members across the Detroit Three. The current contract expires at 11:59 p.m. on Sept. 14.

Industry experts have said any lucrative agreement at this Ultium plant likely signals that Ultium's two other plants — one being built in Spring Hill, Tennessee, and the other in Lansing — will likely also vote yes for union representation. All three Ultium plants will be near GM assembly plants, which are already union-represented. GM will build a fourth battery plant in New Carlisle, which is about 15 miles west of South Bend, Indiana, with partner Samsung SDI, due to open in 2026.