Friday, November 01, 2024

WWIII

Military Challenges to China's South China Sea Claims are Increasing

HMCS Montreal
Courtesy Royal Canadian Navy

Published Oct 27, 2024 7:00 PM by The Strategist

 

 

[By Joe Keary]

Deployments of ships and aircraft to challenge China’s illegal claims in the South China Sea are increasing. European ships are appearing more often, while Asia-Pacific countries are increasingly conducting activities in areas that China regards as sensitive.

Several nations have claims in the South China Sea, but China’s claim is the most extensive and controversial. Beijing seeks to enforce sovereign rights and jurisdiction over all features within the nine-dash line, including the islands, rocks and atolls that make up the Paracel and Spratly Islands. China claims this territory despite a 2016 ruling that found that China’s claims had no basis in international law.

With international law doing little to curb China’s ambitions, more countries are using their militaries to challenge China’s claims. In 2024, more European navies operated in the South China Sea than previously in recent years, with Britain, France, Germany, Italy and the Netherlands all sending ships to the region. Meanwhile regional counties, such as Japan, Canada, New Zealand and Australia, stepped up their engagement, including via joint sailings with the Philippines in the South China Sea.

Different countries take different approaches to challenging China’s illegal claims in the South China Sea. Some militaries are operating within the nine-dash line. Others sail naval ships directly through the Spratly Islands. Some advertise their activities; others do not.

Only a few have conducted activities close to the Paracels, because doing so is unusually risky. A 2022 incident in which a Chinese pilot dumped chaff in front of an Australian P-8 Poseidon surveillance aircraft is an example of the risk.

The US is the only country to send aircraft or ships within 12 nautical miles of claimed features. By doing so, it would be entering territorial waters if China did in fact own the territory.

These military activities to challenge China’s claims have occurred since 2015:

Apart from countries around the South China Sea, which must routinely operate on or over it, the US has by far the most public and active military presence. In 2023, the US military conducted 107 activities, including six specific operations to challenge China’s illegal claims under the US Freedom of Navigation program. US activities are always accompanied by strong public statements.

France and Canada are both active in the region, including within the Spratlys. Both advertise their military presence and actions. Canada now carries journalists on some South China Sea transits. It has operated close to the Paracel Islands, but, as demonstrated when a Chinese fighter fired flares near a Canadian helicopter in 2023, doing so comes with risks. In 2015, France boldly exercised its right to freedom of navigation by sailing a task force through the Paracels.

Australia has an active military presence in the South China Sea. There’s evidence that Australia operates close to China’s illegal claims. However, the tempo and nature of its military challenges are hard to determine, because Canberra does not advertise them. China’s military has been aggressive in seeking to deter Australia from operating near the two island groups by engaging in unsafe intercepts.

New Zealand has a semi-regular presence inside the nine-dash line, commensurate with the size of its armed forces. Meanwhile, Japan has a growing military presence in the region and is increasingly working with partners, such as the US, Australia and the Philippines. As with Australia, there are signs that Japan and New Zealand operate close to, or within, the Spratly group, but neither publicise specific actions, so the nature of them is hard to determine.

Britain sent a carrier strike group through the South China Sea in 2021 and intends to do so again next year. The British military operates close to the Spratly and Paracel Islands and uses public messaging to reinforce the importance of sailing in these areas.

Signalling growing European interest in the region, Germany, the Netherlands and Italy sent navy ships to the area in 2024. But none seems to have overtly challenged China’s claims within the Spratlys or Paracels.

The most notable regional absentee is South Korea. In 2018, a South Korean destroyer, Munmu the Great, took refuge from a typhoon in the Paracel Islands. But Seoul quickly clarified that the ship was not there to challenge China’s claims. Likewise, when the littoral states of South East Asia routinely operate there, they do not directly challenge China’s claims via freedom of navigation transits.

The growing presence of European navies in the South China Sea and stepped-up activity of Asia-Pacific countries there is welcome. It’s helping to push back on China’s growing aggression and reinforce longstanding rules and norms that underpin regional prosperity.

Joe Keary is a senior analyst at ASPI. This article appears courtesy of The Strategist and may be found in its original form here

The opinions expressed herein are the author's and not necessarily those of The Maritime Executive.


Vietnam Puts Strategic Airfield on Newly-Built Island in the Spratlys

Barque Canada Reef, bottom center, is south of China's main bases in the Spratly Islands (U.S. State Department)
Barque Canada Reef from space. Small-scale civil engineering works can be seen at center (Sentinel Hub)

Published Oct 27, 2024 5:15 PM by The Maritime Executive

 

Vietnam is building a new airstrip on newly-reclaimed land in its segment of the Spratly Islands, capping off a large-scale campaign of island-building that began in 2021. 

According to Radio Free Asia, Vietnam added more than 600 acres of dry land to its holdings in the Spratly Islands over the last year alone, using a combination of shore-based dredging equipment and cutter suction dredgers. The largest amount of activity was on Barque Canada Island: it is nearly three miles long now, and has enough space to develop a strategic airstrip of military value (3,000-plus meters). The airstrip in progress is currently about 1,000 meters long and growing. 

The Asia Maritime Transparency Institute (AMTI) predicted that Vietnam would install an airstrip on the island earlier this year, and suggested that it would help the Vietnamese military expand the reach of its maritime patrols. 

According to RFA, Vietnamese sources expect that their government will add at least one more new airstrip in the area, and perhaps several. Barque Canada Reef is at the southern end of the archipelago, south and west of most of China's largest military installations. Vietnam also occupies islands to the north of Mischief Reef and Fiery Cross Reef, where China maintains naval harbors and large strategic airstrips, and the Vietnamese military could potentially straddle China's positions with new base infrastructure on either side.

Beijing's South China Sea Probing Initiative claims that the Vietnamese effort could eventually eclipse Beijing's massive military infrastructure program in the region. So far, however, China's response has been muted - unlike its confrontational and contentious relationship with Manila, which has an EEZ claim over the archipelago but no island-building programs. 

The Philippines and Vietnam have moved to settle their maritime claim differences in the South China Sea, and have pledged to abide by the outcome of an international arbitration process. However, Vietnam is on track to have the upper hand in the area, according to Chen Xiangmiao of the pro-China National Institute for South China Sea Studies.

"With recent upgrades to its port facilities, Vietnam is poised to maintain a continuous maritime law enforcement presence, which will significantly strengthen its control over the entire Spratly region," Chen told the South China Morning Post. "These maneuvers could lead to an escalation in maritime interactions and competition between China and Vietnam, raising significant concerns for Chinese authorities."

No comments: