Monday, February 27, 2023

Exposed: 17,000 European sites contaminated by forever chemicals. Where are the worst spots?

An investigation has revealed the ‘frightening’ scale of forever chemical pollution in Europe - 

By Charlotte Elton • Updated: 24/02/2023

More than 17,000 sites across Europe and the UK are contaminated by dangerous forever chemicals, a new investigation has revealed.

These toxic artificial substances - also known as per-and polyfluorinated alkyl substances, or PFAs - are extremely persistent and don’t break down in the natural environment.

They have been linked to a variety of health conditions - and, according to the Forever Pollution Project, they’re everywhere.

The collaborative investigation detected PFAS at high concentrations of more than 1,000 nanograms a litre of water at about 640 sites. At 300 sites, PFAS levels exceeded 10,000ng/l.

For reference, Denmark’s Environmental Protection Agency stipulates that drinking water must not contain more than 2ng/l.

The results are extremely concerning, said Phil Brown, a health sciences professor at Boston’s Northeastern University. Brown helped to coordinate the research for LeMonde and the Guardian, the news outlets that led the investigation.

"It's a necessary and frightening result," he said.

Overall, the investigators deemed 2,100 sites hotspots - places where contamination reaches levels that are hazardous to human health.

What are forever chemicals?

There are more than 4,700 forever chemicals on the market. They’re non-stick and stain-repellent - making them common ingredients in everything from cookware to clothing to fire-fighting foam.

But the substances take a toll on human health.

The chemicals have been linked to a massive array of health issues. These include, but are not limited to, high cholesterol, ulcerative colitis, pregnancy-induced hypertension, thyroid disease, cancer, and decreased response to vaccines.

PFAS have been detected in embryos and breast milk.


Where are forever chemicals found in Europe?

The Forever Pollution Project is a collaborative investigation by 18 European newsrooms, led by France’s Le Monde and the Guardian.

The chemicals are everywhere, but some hotspots are worse than others.

Belgium has the highest level of pollution. Zwijndrecht, Flanders - home to a PFAS manufacturing site - recorded concentrations of up to 73 million nanograms per litre. This is 36.5 million times the recommended level.

Residents in surrounding areas have been told to avoid homegrown vegetables and eggs laid in their gardens.

70,000 people living within five kilometres of the plant have been offered a blood test to look for the presence of PFAS.   The full map is available here.


Other studies have also discovered the chemicals in human blood, fish, plants, breast milk, drinking water, soil, and embryos.

What can we do about forever chemicals?

The chemicals are very difficult to clean up.

“The cost of remediation will likely reach the tens of billions of Euros. In several places, the authorities have already given up and decided to keep the toxic chemicals in the ground, because it’s not possible to clean them up,” the Forever Pollution project warns.

All rainwater now contains lethal forever chemicals. But this rubbish tip may have found the answer

Most experts believe the best solution is regulation to prevent them from entering the environment in the first place.

Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden and Denmark - all of which have strong internal rules on PFAS - have jointly submitted a proposal to have the toxic substances restricted throughout the EU.

"With PFAS, we have a problematic group of substances,” says Steffi Lemke, Germany’s Federal Environment minister.

“That`s why I think that this group of substances should be reviewed quite fundamentally and the dangerous substances should be taken off the market and banned."

Belgium has highest levels of PFAS chemical pollution in Europe, study reveals

By Leana Hosea and Rachel Salvidge | The Guardian
Feb 24, 2023 (updated: Feb 24, 2023)

The map shows that Belgium is home to the highest levels of pollution, where PFAS was found in groundwater at concentrations up to 73m ng/l around 3M’s PFAS manufacturing site in Zwijndrecht, Flanders. 

Major mapping project reveals PFAS have been found at high levels at thousands of sites across Europe. EURACTIV’s media partner, The Guardian, reports.

Pollutants known as “forever chemicals”, which don’t break down in the environment, build up in the body and may be toxic, have been found at high levels at thousands of sites across the UK and Europe, a major mapping project has revealed.

The map shows that per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), a family of about 10,000 chemicals valued for their non-stick and detergent properties, have made their way into water, soils and sediments from a wide range of consumer products, firefighting foams, waste and industrial processes.

Two PFAS have been linked to an array of health problems. PFOA has been connected with kidney and testicular cancer, thyroid disease, ulcerative colitis, high cholesterol and pregnancy-induced hypertension. PFOS has been associated with reproductive, developmental, liver, kidney, and thyroid disease. At lower levels PFAS have been associated with immunotoxicity.

The substances have been found at about 17,000 sites across the UK and Europe. Of these, PFAS have been detected at high concentrations of more than 1,000 nanograms a litre of water at about 640 sites, and above 10,000ng/l at 300 locations.

“These sorts of concentrations raise concerns with me,” said Prof Crispin Halsall, an environmental chemist at Lancaster University. “You have the risk of livestock gaining access to those waters and [then PFAS is] in the human food web.” Halsall says there are also risks involving people “accessing wildlife as food sources like fishing and wildfowl”.

The map shows that Belgium is home to the highest levels of pollution, where PFAS was found in groundwater at concentrations up to 73m ng/l around 3M’s PFAS manufacturing site in Zwijndrecht, Flanders.

People living within 15km of the site have been told not to eat any eggs laid in their gardens and to avoid homegrown vegetables. Meanwhile, 70,000 people living within a 5km radius of the plant have been offered a blood test to look for the presence of PFAS. 3M says it will remediate the site and has “signed an agreement with the Flemish region … with an investment amount of €571m”. It has also announced plans to exit PFAS manufacturing “and work to discontinue the use of PFAS across its product portfolio by the end of 2025”.

In the Netherlands, an accident involving PFAS in firefighting foam has contaminated land around Schiphol airport in Amsterdam, resulting in soils containing extremely high levels of PFOS. Some airports and military sites in Germany have been found to have similar problems.


Health Brief: The dangers of 'forever chemicals'

New warnings of health effects from the widely used “forever chemicals” per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) continue to emerge as years go by. Despite all the knowledge, action to limit these chemicals in products and our environment is slow.

In the UK, the highest levels of PFAS were found in a discharge from a chemicals plant on the River Wyre, above Blackpool. Fish in the river have been found to contain high levels of PFAS, with flounder containing up to 11,000ng/kg, according to data from Defra’s Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science.

Prof Ian Cousins, an environmental scientist at Stockholm University, said that sites with readings above 1,000ng/kg should be “urgently assessed” so that they can be remediated.

“At [highly] contaminated sites, local authorities should consider testing to ensure that PFAS levels are safe in local produce. This would help determine if local health advisories and publication campaigns to discourage regular consumption of wild fish, shellfish, free range eggs … are needed,” he added.

Halsall said: “PFAS in groundwater is a big problem because if that groundwater is abstracted for farming, or more importantly for humans as a water source, then you’ve got PFAS in your drinking water and it’s very difficult to remove.”

The map shows that drinking water sources in the UK have been contaminated with PFAS but water companies say that the chemicals do not make it into the final tap water because it would first either be blended with another source to dilute the PFAS, or it would undergo a specialised treatment process and be removed.

Data obtained from water companies and the Environment Agency by the Guardian and Watershed shows that since 2006 about 120 samples of drinking water sources have been found to contain concentrations of PFOS or PFOA at above the 100ng/l level – the point at which the Drinking Water Inspectorate’s (DWI) guidelines state that water companies should take action to reduce it before supplying it to people’s homes. Until 2009, the DWI guideline limit was much higher, at 3,000ng/l.

The guideline limits for PFAS in drinking water are much lower in the US, where the Environmental Protection Agency has set a health advisory limit of 0.004ng/l for PFOA and 0.02ng/l for PFOS. In Denmark, the Environmental Protection Agency stipulates that drinking water must not contain more than 2ng/l for the sum of four PFASs.

Drinking water limits for PFAS continue to be brought down in response to growing evidence about their health impacts, according to Rita Loch-Caruso, a professor of toxicology at the University of Michigan. “We’re finding health effects at lower and lower concentrations – in the single digits,” she said.

Chemist and PFAS expert Roger Klein said he believes the UK’s “DWI limits are ridiculously high by current international standards”.

He also believes the practice of blending water to dilute the PFAS is wrong. “It is the lazy way out and it doesn’t remove the PFAS, which remains a problem since [they are] highly persistent and bioaccumulative.”

A Defra spokesperson said the UK had “very high standards” for drinking water and that water companies were “required to carry out regular risk assessments and sampling for PFAS to ensure the drinking water supply remains safe.

“PFAS chemicals are in the environment because they have been used widely in products and are extremely persistent. Since the 2000s we have taken action to increase monitoring and support a ban or highly restricting specific PFAS both domestically and internationally,” they said, adding that the department would continue to work with regulators to understand the risks.

Harmful 'forever' chemicals widespread in EU fast food packaging, warns new report

The use of persistent and health-harming PFAS chemicals in disposable food packaging remains widespread across Europe, according to a new report, which highlights the role of regulation in reducing exposure to these chemicals.

Despite the large number of detections revealed by the map, it is thought to be the tip of the iceberg. The Environment Agency has admitted that PFOS – known to be toxic to fish and other aquatic life – is ubiquitous in the environment and that the presence of PFOS in rivers will mean that many will not meet water quality standards until 2039.

In the UK just PFOS and PFOA are regulated. In the EU, there is a proposal to regulate PFASs as one class, rather than to attempt to deal with each substance independently. The European Chemicals Agency says that about 4.4m tonnes of PFAS will end up in the environment over the next 30 years unless action is taken.

The Fluoropolymers Product Group (FPG) opposes the EU’s moves to treat all PFAS as one class, instead advocating differentiating between fluoropolymers and other PFAS groups, and considering the different risk profiles and uses of each group separately.

“While the FPG understands the concerns related to the potential persistency of most of PFAS, we consider that this concern for the environment can be managed through alternative restrictions rather than a ban,” said Nicolas Robin, director of the FPG.

“[PFAS pollution] is similar to plastic pollution in that these chemicals are not degradable, [but] in the case of PFAS it is invisible,” said Cousins. “We continuously release them, so the levels in the environment will continue to increase and it’s only a matter of time before the levels of PFAS in the environment or in our bodies pass the threshold where there will be an effect on human health,” he said.

Ministers told to get a grip on scale of ‘forever chemicals’ pollution in UK

Tougher regulations needed now, says Green MP Caroline Lucas as Tory colleague calls for monitoring




















The River Roding in east London has 20 times the level of PFAS the EU standard is proposing. Photograph: Graham Turner/The Guardian

The UK government must get a grip on the scale of “forever chemicals” polluting rivers and seas and threatening human and animal health, the Green MP Caroline Lucas has said.

The Guardian has revealed that high levels of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), known as forever chemicals, have been found at thousands of sites across the UK and Europe in a major mapping project.

The map shows drinking water sources in the UK have been contaminated with PFAS. Water companies say the pollutants do not make it into the final tap water because they are blended with another source to dilute the chemicals, or they undergo a specialised treatment process to be removed.

But Caroline Lucas, the MP for Brighton Pavilion, said: “A cocktail of toxic persistent chemicals is polluting our rivers and seas, infecting our food and water supply, and posing a severe threat to human health, marine and animal life. Yet the UK’s chemical pollution limits are nowhere near international standards, and water companies’ claims that blending chemicals with other sources to dilute the pollutants simply won’t wash.

“The government urgently needs to get a grip on this chemical crisis and adopt tougher regulations now.”

Data obtained from water companies and the Environment Agency by the Guardian and Watershed shows that since 2006 about 120 samples of drinking water sources have been found to contain concentrations of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) or perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), collectively known as PFAS, at above the 100ng/l level. This is the level at which the Drinking Water Inspectorate (DWI) guidelines say water companies should take action to reduce the concentrations before supplying people’s homes. Until 2009, the DWI guideline limit was much higher, at 3,000ng/l. The guideline limits for PFAS in drinking water are much lower in the US.

Forever chemicals are one of the reasons no river in England passes biological and chemical pollution tests.

Sites where PFAS has been identified at 10ng/l or over

Source: Watershed Investigations. Map data from OpenStreetMap. Mapping powered by Leaflet


Philip Dunne, the Conservative chair of the environmental audit committee, led an inquiry into river water quality that concluded a chemical cocktail of pollutants was pouring into waterways. His committee has called on ministers to carry out a UK-wide survey to understand better the chemicals we are being exposed to in everyday life.

“The stark fact is that we are blind to the harmful pollutants coursing through our waterways because they are simply not being routinely monitored,” said Dunne. “Monitoring for these persistent pollutants absolutely must be improved if we have any hope in turning the tide: not a single river in England has received a clean bill of health for chemical contamination.”

He added: “It was disappointing the government did not accept the committee’s recommendations in the toxic chemicals report it made in 2019, and in the water quality in rivers report of 2022, that a UK-wide survey be undertaken to understand better the chemicals we are being exposed to in everyday life. I trust the government’s current work to address water quality will prioritise the systematic monitoring of forever chemicals.”

In a tweet, Mary Creagh, who previously chaired the Commons’ environmental audit committee, said: “Everything we do to the Earth, we do to ourselves. Environmental pollution causes huge damage to human health.”

The dangers of PFAS are widely known in the US, thanks in part to the pioneering work of the lawyer Rob Bilott, who was played by Mark Ruffalo in the 2019 film about this subject, Dark Waters. On Friday, he tweeted about the revelations.

Sunday, February 26, 2023

Controversial UK Biomass Energy Giant Sees Earnings Jump By 84%

Power generation firm Drax is the latest winner from the energy price crisis, with its earnings up 84 percent in the last 12 months to £731m.

Drax, which received £6bn in green energy subsidies from British taxpayers over the last four-decades, was the latest energy giant to announce bumper profits; recent announcements include Shell (£32.2bn), Equinor (£23.8bn), EDF (£1.1bn), Centrica (£3.3bn) and BP (£23bn).

It is due to receive £800m this year.

Two MPs campaigning against its biomass subsidy urged the government to stop giving the company money, with one even accusing it of “greenwashing”.

The Yorkshire-based company reported its operating profit and profit before tax were both significantly down from 2021, while the company’s profit after tax was up at £83m, up from £55m.

Drax operates the country’s largest power station in North Yorkshire that provides 12 percent of the UK’s renewable electricity and claimed it is the largest source of renewable power by output at 11 per cent.

The firm is also home to two coal-fired power units which have been left on standby this year to help National Grid stave off blackouts over the winter amid a Russian squeeze on energy supplies.

Its chief renewables source is it 2.6GW biomass plant, which burns millions of tonnes of imported wood pellets to generate energy – providing around four percent of the UK’s overall output.

It was, however, subject to a major BBC panorama documentary, accusing it of cutting down protected forests.

Brits have been struggling with their energy bills ahead of the falling of the price cap on 1 April. Ofgem will cap gas and electric bills at £3,294 from 1 April, according to Cornwall Insights’ forecast, but Brits are still expected to pay 20 percent higher bills, as the cap only partially covers customers.

“Our renewable generation – biomass, hydro and pumped storage – are a major source of power in the UK and during periods of peak demand when there was low wind and solar power, these assets collectively supplied up to 70% of the UK’s renewable power in certain periods”, said Will Gardiner, CEO of Drax Group.

On BECCS, developing a pipeline of projects in the US targeting long-term large-scale carbon removal, he said the company “can become a world-leading solution for large-scale high-quality” removals, in its shift to cleaner energy.

“Drax stands ready to invest billions of pounds in the development of this technology and, following the introduction of the US Inflation Reduction Act, we are increasingly excited about the opportunities to deploy BECCS in the US.

“In response, the UK Government should accelerate its policy support for BECCS to make the UK a world leader in carbon removals, while attracting investment and delivering its net-zero targets.

Reacting to the results, two leading MPs with the ‘Cut Carbon Not Forests’ criticised the government for backing the UK’s bioenergy reliance, while giving Drax a billion pounds a year.

According to a survey by the group, 62 percent of the public think it’s wrong for the government to give subsidies to biomass energy production firms like Drax. 59 percent disagree with funding it to fight climate change.

Tory MP Pauline Latham MP criticised her own party, saying the UK “pays significant sums in renewable energy subsidies to bioenergy companies making sizeable profits, despite it releasing huge amounts of greenhouse gases and harming forests’ ability to absorb carbon.

“This directly costs billpayers and families through their energy bills. In the context of the cost of living crisis, the Government should be looking into these subsidies and ensuring they are used for proven renewable energy sources and energy efficiency measures, rather than harming nature.”

Tommy Sheppard MP of the SNP, said; “It’s clear that the British public aren’t falling for the myth that biomass is carbon neutral, no matter how many greenwashing PR stunts companies like Drax pull to convince people otherwise.”

“Taxpayer money should be spent on real emission-free energy sources, not on technology that pumps more carbon into the atmosphere and destroys forests worldwide. Burning tees on an industrial scale for electricity does the latter. It’s time the UK Government listened to the public and end wasteful biomass subsidies.”

By City AM

UK’s Biggest Polluter Doubles Profits while Raking In Hundreds of Millions in Government Subsidies

Rachel Donald
24 February 2023
Photo: PA/Alamy

The UK gives more to bioenergy firms than any other country in the world, reports Rachel Donald

Energy giant Drax has announced huge profits, with the ‘bioenergy’ company raking in £731 million thanks to the energy crisis. The UK’s single biggest source of CO2 increased its earnings by 84% while claiming almost £900 million in government subsidies.

But new research shows that the majority of Brits oppose the vast subsidies the Government is giving to bioenergy – electricity produced by burning biomass like trees – every year. In fact, the Cut Carbon Not Forests coalition found that just 3% of Brits think that taxpayer money should prop up these energy companies.

The UK gives almost £2 billion to bioenergy firms, more than any other country in the world.

In 2021, the Government gave £893 million of public money to Drax, despite the firm belching out almost 20 million tonnes of CO2 annually, more than any other emitter in the country. But Drax’s emissions, and the emissions of all UK bioenergy, are omitted from the UK’s carbon footprint by the Government on the grounds that the emissions will be accounted for in the country where the trees were sourced.

Matt Williams, a campaigner for Cut Carbon Not Forests, said: “Bioenergy companies have been raking it in at the expense of families facing soaring energy bills, the world’s forests, and the climate. They’ve been allowed to claim that burning trees, instead of coal, is magically zero carbon. It’s clearly not. They’ve ridden off into the sunset, through a landscape littered with tree-stumps, pockets stuffed full of our money.”

Conservative MP Pauline Latham has criticised the Government for spending huge sums on a major polluter as millions of Brits are suffering from yet another economic crisis. “In the context of the cost of living crisis, the Government should be looking into these subsidies and ensuring they are used for proven renewable energy sources and energy efficiency measures, rather than harming nature,” she said.

Drax did not respond to a request for comment.

Bioenergy is often touted as a renewable energy source on the basis that forests are replantable. However wood-burning in this way produces more CO2 than burning coal, a notoriously filthy fossil fuel. In fact, burning biomass for power has been emitting more CO2 in the UK than coal since 2019.

“The scale of these subsidies just don’t add up,” according to Phil MacDonald, managing director of independent energy think tank, Ember. “Politicians are finding it more and more difficult to justify any increase to energy bills, and more and more difficult to justify burning biomass as the climate implications become clear. Large-scale burning of forest biomass is a threat to the climate, and should be phased-out.”

The UK is the biggest culprit in subsidising bioenergy in Europe, with last year’s £1.8 billion in subsidies representing a 70% increase from 2015.

While claiming the majority of that subsidy, Drax came under fire last year after BBC’s Panorama exposed the energy giant for importing primary forest from Canada, despite claiming it only uses sawdust and waste wood.

Scientists insist that old forests are not renewable simply because trees can be replanted – old forests support rich ecosystems and thousands of other plant species which equally capture carbon through photosynthesis. They are also home to animal and insect species that are dependent on these rich and ancient ecosystems for survival.

For economist and professor Steve Keen, viewing trees as either carbon capturing devices or furnace fuel is part of the fallacy of thinking economics can solve the crisis, says economist and professor.

“Trees in an old growth forest – as opposed to a plantation – are clearly visible components of an incredibly complex web of life, much of which is invisible,” he told Byline Times. “Damage to this web can’t be offset by planting trees elsewhere. Carbon accounting and the like do trivialise that web. They assume a level of simplicity to biological processes that is simply false and fool us into ignoring the complexity of life, without which there wouldn’t be an economy in the first place.”

Economic tricks may balance carbon on the books but emissions are on the rise in polluting countries even as they claim to head towards net zero – a practice that justifies the Government writing off Drax’s CO2 emissions despite the energy company being the country’s biggest CO2 polluter.

But Cut Carbon Not Forests and opposition MPs believe that the public is waking up. Scottish National Party MP, Tommy Sheppard, said: “It’s clear that the British public aren’t falling for the myth that biomass is carbon neutral, no matter how many greenwashing PR stunts companies like Drax pull to convince people otherwise.”

Energy firms have made record-breaking profits and claimed billions in subsidies, while millions of citizens struggle to afford to heat their homes.

Frances Sleap, of Fuel Poverty Action, said: “As our energy costs soar, UK bill payers are footing a huge bill to subsidise Drax shipping in and burning trees. This is pushing crippling energy bills up even further, without delivering environmental benefits. What we need is insulation to keep us warm, and renewables that don’t burn anything to power our future.”

Sheppard agrees: “Taxpayer money should be spent on real emission-free energy sources, not on technology that pumps more carbon into the atmosphere and destroys forests worldwide. Burning tees on an industrial scale for electricity does the latter. It’s time the UK Government listened to the public and end wasteful biomass subsidies.”

Call to cut UK subsidies as Drax power station profits nearly double

Critics say power generator would make loss without public support as firm boosts dividend after 84% rise in profits to £731m


Alex Lawson
Energy correspondent
The Guardian
Thu 23 Feb 2023 

Ministers are under pressure to cut subsidies to the operator of Britain’s biggest power station after it reported an 84% increase in annual profits, helped by high electricity prices.

Drax, the power generator that owns the eponymous plant in North Yorkshire, posted underlying profits of £731m for 2022, up from £398m a year earlier.

The company also increased its dividend by 11.7% to 21p a share – an £84m payout to shareholders.

Drax, which has faced criticism over its use of biomass, has benefited from soaring power prices over the past year. Electricity prices are linked to wholesale gas costs, which have risen sharply since the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

Will Gardiner, the chief executive, said: “Drax delivered a strong performance in 2022, and played a significant role in ensuring security of supply during a challenging year for the UK’s energy system.”

Drax, which supplies up to 6% of the UK’s electricity, and is seen as a source of when weather conditions preclude significant wind and solar power generation.

Climate campaigners have accused Drax of greenwashing, arguing its biomass operations, which burn wood pellets to produce electricity, are far from green and can even increase the CO2 emissions driving the climate crisis.

Most of the wood is imported from North America. The former energy secretary Kwasi Kwarteng called its business model “not sustainable”.

Drax was the subject of a BBC Panorama investigation over alleged forest destruction and has also been accused of “environmental racism”.

The power company said it had earned £837m in subsidies in 2020 and £885m in 2021. The level of support fell to £617m in 2022 as electricity prices exceed an agreed “strike price” agreed to encourage renewable investment.

This meant Drax paid out £33m to the Low Carbon Contracts Company, a government-owned firm, compared with receiving £231m under the same mechanism a year earlier. However, it still received £650m under an older renewable energy scheme.

The thinktank Ember has estimated that, from 2012 until 2027, when the support runs out, Drax would have collected more than £11bn in subsidies.

The Conservative MP Pauline Latham said: “The government pays significant sums in renewable energy subsidies to bioenergy companies making sizeable profits, despite it releasing huge amounts of greenhouse gases and harming forests’ ability to absorb carbon.

“This directly costs bill payers and families through their energy bills. In the context of the cost of living crisis, the government should be looking into these subsidies and ensuring they are used for proven renewable energy sources and energy efficiency measures, rather than harming nature.”

Sally-Ann Hart, a Conservative MP, said: “Burning imported wood pellets for electricity is not cheap for bill payers. Given the growing environmental concerns, ministers shouldn’t commit to new subsidies for this energy source.skip past newsletter promotion

“We should prioritise investment in clean and cheap energy sources that keep the lights on and bills low while tackling climate change, not an industry which risks fuelling deforestation.”

Research by the Cut Carbon Not Forests coalition found that 62% of 2,005 UK adults surveyed thought it was wrong for the government to hand the bioenergy generator large subsidies, particularly during a cost of living crisis.

The SNP MP Tommy Sheppard said: “It’s clear that the British public aren’t falling for the myth that biomass is carbon neutral, no matter how many greenwashing PR stunts companies like Drax pull to convince people otherwise.”

Drax is the latest UK energy firm to report a sharp rise in profits, after BP, Shell and the British Gas owner, Centrica. Their gains led to renewed calls for tougher windfall taxes.

Some of Drax’s operations are covered by the electricity generator levy introduced this year but the company said recognition in the construction of the tax that biomass costs were higher than those of windfarms meant the levy “should not have an adverse impact on biomass generation”.

Separately, more than 180 staff at the Drax plant near Selby, in North Yorkshire, have begun a series of strikes that will run through February, March and April after rejecting a proposed pay deal.

The company also agreed to extend the life of two coal units through the winter after a government request, amid fears over power cuts. The units have not been called into action but Drax said on Thursday that they “delivered income during the final quarter of 2022”.

'Greenwashing' power plant operator Drax sparks fury after its profits soar to £730 million, fuelled by hundreds of millions in taxpayer subsidies

Drax reported a profit of £731million for last year – up from £398million in 2021

Campaigners argue its claims of producing renewable energy are exaggerated


By CALUM MUIRHEAD, CITY REPORTER
23 February 2023

Power station operator Drax sparked fury yesterday after its profits soared, fuelled by hundreds of millions in taxpayer subsidies for supposedly ‘green’ energy.

The company also attracted the ire of environmental campaigners, who argue its claims of producing ‘renewable’ energy are exaggerated and point out that it is one of Britain’s biggest carbon dioxide polluters.

Drax runs a biomass power plant in Selby in North Yorkshire which burns wood pellets to generate electricity

Yesterday it reported a profit of £731 million for last year, up from £398 million in 2021 as it cashed in on soaring power prices.

The company often touts its green credentials, stating it was the UK’s ‘largest source of renewable power’ last year and had played ‘a significant role’ in bolstering Britain’s energy security.



Drax reported a profit of £731million for last year – up from £398million in 2021. Pictured: Drax power station in North Yorkshire

But campaigners accuse the company of ‘greenwashing’ its operation as the pellets burned in its power plant are made from wood cut from forests in Canada, the US and Estonia which is then shipped over to the UK.

Critics have pointed out that, rather than being a green source of energy, the burning of biomass emits large amounts of greenhouse gases.

Burning wood is the UK electricity industry’s second biggest cause of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, with the Drax plant being the largest single source.

The company is also the fourth largest CO2 emitter in Europe, according to energy think-tank Ember.

Anger has also been sparked by the fact Drax’s profits are heavily reliant on Government bioenergy subsidies.

The taxpayer paid out £1.8 billion to the industry in 2021, making the UK the biggest subsidiser of bioenergy in Europe.

Drax received the vast majority of this funding, taking £893 million, meaning that without taxpayer backing its losses could have run into hundreds of millions of pounds.

These subsidies were also estimated by Ember to have added £11.60 to the average household energy bill.

Drax is able to claim the hefty sums because the government considers burning wood and other biomass to be ‘carbon neutral’ despite the fact CO2 absorbed by trees is released back into the atmosphere during the process.

Wood burning also emits large amounts of fine particles, which in high enough concentrations can cause health problems such as high blood pressure, strokes and premature death.

Matt Williams, from campaign group Cut Carbon Not Forests, said: ‘Drax’s enormous profits are propped up by enormous renewable energy subsidies.


Drax runs a biomass power plant in Selby, North Yorkshire, burning wood pellets

‘But this is money for nothing: burning the world’s forests isn’t low-carbon at all, and it takes money from struggling families by raising their energy bills.’

Conservative MP Pauline Latham called on the government to ensure the subsidies were being used for ‘proven renewable energy sources’.

‘The Government pays significant sums in renewable energy subsidies to bioenergy companies making sizeable profits, despite it releasing huge amounts of greenhouse gases and harming forests’ ability to absorb carbon. This directly costs billpayers and families through their energy bills,’ she said.

The comments echoed those made last year by the then-business secretary Kwasi Kwarteng, who said in August that Drax’s business model of importing wood from abroad to burn in its power plant ‘doesn’t make any sense’ and did not help lower the UK’s carbon emissions.

A Drax spokesman said: ‘Drax plays a vital role in UK energy security and is this country’s biggest renewable power generator by output, providing enough reliable, renewable electricity for 4 million homes, whatever the weather.’

They added: ‘Biomass has played a crucial role in displacing fossil fuels and supporting more intermittent renewables like wind and solar – enabling Britain’s electricity grid to decarbonise at a faster rate than any other in the world.

‘In the coming years, we plan to invest billions of pounds into accelerating our plans to produce more renewable energy, deliver carbon removals... and reduce our own emissions.’

Matt Williams from Cut Carbon Not Forests said: ‘Burning forests isn’t low-carbon... and it takes money from struggling families by raising energy bills.’

Tory MP Pauline Latham called on the Government to ensure subsidies were used only for ‘proven renewable energy sources’. A Drax spokesman said biomass has ‘played a crucial role in displacing fossil fuels’.



OUR TAX SUBSIDIES AT WORK

Oil, Gas Industry Sees Lobby Spending Dip In 2022

When adjusted for inflation, the oil and gas industry’s spend on lobbying the federal government last year dipped slightly.

In actual terms, oil and gas industry spent $124.4 million on federal lobbying, according to an OpenSecrets’ analysis that was released on Thursday.  Of that $124.4 million, Koch Industries spend $11.29 million—more than any other oil and gas industry, the records show.

In real terms, the 2022 spend is up slightly from 2021—but 2021 lobbying spend was still depressed from the Covid-19 pandemic.

Oxy, Exxon, Conoco, and Chevron spent a combined $44.3 million on federal lobbying.

The API, unsurprisingly, also spent a big chunk on lobbying—about $4.4 million.

Overall, just ten oil and gas companies accounted for more than half of the spending on lobbying from the industry.

Also not surprisngly, the most-lobbied congressional bill, according to OpenSecrets, was the massive Inflation Reduction Act of 2022. Other lobbying agendas include regulatory approvals for large projects, like Conoco’s Willow project in the Alaskan Arctic and Enterprise Products Partners deepwater oil export terminal offshore Texas.

Last year, 636 oil and gas lobbyists registered to attend COP27 in Egypt, 25% more than oil and gas lobbyist registrants in COP26—and more than the combined delegates of the ten countries most impacted by climate change. The oil and gas lobby attending the event exceeded any single national delegation apart from the UAE.

The oil and gas lobby has increased the calls on the Biden Administration to increase access to domestic oil and gas resources, reform the permitting process, and reverse the hostile rhetoric toward the industry—changes that could help to bolster America’s energy security.

“If America doesn’t lead, others will,” API President and CEO Mike Sommers said last month.

By Julianne Geiger for Oilprice.com