Monday, September 02, 2024

Connection with coast and inland waterways has multiple health benefits—here's how we measure them


 SEPTEMBER 1, 2024

beach chair
Credit: Pixabay/CC0 Public Domain

Imagine you've had a hard day. You've only managed to get a fraction of your urgent tasks done. Your partner, boss, friend or mother (delete as appropriate) has been giving you a hard time. Just thinking about this is raising your blood pressure (my apologies).

Now, imagine "paradise." Suddenly, thoughts of a calm, deep blue sea lapping gently onto a white sandy beach fringed with palm trees start to come to mind.

Others may turn inland and imagine a mountain lake reflecting the pine trees and jagged peaks with a sparkling waterfall cascading down. Just thinking about such scenes can quickly stabilize negative emotions and reduce stress-related biomarkers such as lower heart rate (you're welcome).

Water is present in nearly all of these daydreams. Oceans are lapping, rivers are bubbling, waterfalls are cascading, lakes are sparkling.

These "blue spaces" feature highly in the places we visit for recreation, holidays and retirement, so why do they play such an important role in helping us to de-stress? Are our intuitions that blue spaces are good for us backed up by evidence?

As part of what has become known over the last 15 years as the "blue " program of work, colleagues and I around the world have been trying to answer these and related questions.

In one of our earliest studies, we focused on the coast. Using census data from 40 million adults in England, we found that people living closer to the sea tended to report better overall health once other factors, such as age and local area income, employment, education and crime levels were accounted for.

A second study tracked more than 15,000 people for a decade, some of whom moved closer to the coast and some further away during that period. Supporting the census data, people reported being healthier and having less mental distress in years when they lived within 5km of the sea. Importantly, this wasn't just a "happy retiree effect"—we found the same results with the working age population.

Other researchers found similar effects for inland waters, such as lakesrivers and canals.

Why might living near the coast or  benefit our health and well-being? One simple mechanism is more exercise. Our research showed that people who live near water are more likely to meet recommended levels of physical activity and this seems to be a major reason why they also report better health.

Looking at, listening to, and immersing ourselves in both inland and  could directly benefit mental health. Lots of data relies on large-scale public surveys which suggests that visiting inland and coastal waters can reduce negative emotions and boost positive ones.

Laboratory and field experiments show that exposure to blue spaces is associated with lower stress markers, such as heart rate and sweating response.

A study conducted in a  showed that patients "walking" along a virtual beach during treatment reported lower pain both directly after the procedures and a week later when asked to recall pain levels, than those undergoing normal procedures or walking around a pleasant town setting. Lower recalled pain is important because it's a major factor in deciding whether to go back to the dentists in future.

In-depth interview studies have been conducted to provide meaning to the numbers, with people often referring to the importance of the dynamic changes which water settings magnify such as sunrises and sunsets.

Blue spaces are considered important places to spend quality time with friends and families, which has a range of benefits for mental and physical health.

Although much of the work started in the UK, similar findings have now been demonstrated across Europe, North America, Australia and Asia. One study from a  in Indonesia showed that local people who went sea swimming or snorkeling regularly during COVID coped better with the crisis.

Although it's tempting to explain these benefits in terms of a hardwired connection with blue spaces reflecting an evolutionary heritage, it's impossible to test those assumptions in a scientific way.

Inland and coastal waters also pose a myriad of threats to our health and well-being from floods to microbial pollution, and they can be breeding grounds for disease-carrying insects and larger predators, so a "pro-water" evolutionary account seems problematic. We have tried to better understand the balance of risks and benefits and view our evidence in terms of current benefits to individuals and societies rather than ones that may or may not have helped our ancestors.

Building resilience

Blue spaces can help us cope with adversity by building resilience. Well-designed urban blue spaces such as fountains can help reduce urban heat island effects, a growing threat under  especially for older people. Blue spaces can also be a great social leveler, reducing inequalities in health and well-being between rich and poor.

Improving access to local urban blue spaces in poorer districts can increase community cohesion and resident well-being. At a more personal level, sharing blue  memories can stimulate positive shared experiences with friends and families in potentially stressful care contexts, such as with people with dementia.

As blue spaces are under increasing threat from pollution, overdevelopment or climate change, enhancing the quality of blue spaces for our health and well-being is just part of a much wider challenge to protect these vitally important places.

Hopefully when asked to think about paradise, future generations can still daydream about clean pristine beaches and clear mountain lakes, knowing these exist in reality and are not just forgotten remnants of a once beautiful earth.

Provided by The Conversation 

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.The Conversation

Positive childhood experiences of coastal and inland waters such as rivers and lakes linked to better adult well-being

A blueprint for phasing out coal power stations in Asia

September 2, 2024
Ellen Phiddian
Cosmos science journalist


Countries in the Asia-Pacific region account for 76% of the world’s thermal coal power generation, and many of these plants will need to retire early to meet global emissions targets.

But according to a new analysis, it’s possible to phase these coal plants out and transition to renewable energy while investors still make money.

The study, done by Australian, Singaporean and Chinese researchers, is published in Energy Policy.

“There is a drive and interest from a number of different investors like the Asian Development Bank, but also private sector investors, to finance the early retirement coal fired power plants,” lead author Professor Christoph Nedopil Wang, director of Griffith University’s Asia Institute, tells Cosmos.

Nedopil and colleagues looked specifically at 6 Chinese-sponsored coal-fired power plants in Vietnam and Pakistan.

“With investors wanting to invest in, and ideally also providing lower cost financing for, green projects, refinancing of these coal fired power plants becomes possible at a lower cost,” says Nedopil.

The researchers modelled the future performance of these stations under a variety of financing and geoeconomic scenarios.

“That brought us to the conclusion that, depending on the age of the coal-fired power plant, we can retire these plants earlier than currently envisaged, while reducing the financing cost and therefore increasing enterprise value,” says Nedopil.

A power plant in Mao Khe City, Vietnam. Credit: Kim Steele / Getty Images

The plants could be retired between 3 and 13 years earlier than planned, while still preserving or increasing profits for investors.

Younger plants were the most promising cases.

“These coal-fired power plants have a lot of debt on their balance sheet – at the beginning, 75% debt. On this debt, the owners of the coal fired power plant, of course, have to pay interest rates. And if the interest of the debt portion is very, very high, most of the free cash flows will go to service the debt, and particularly the interest rate,” says Nedopil.

“The young coal-fired power plants have this interesting window of opportunity for providing cheaper refinancing and therefore lowering interest rates.”

While the findings relate to 6 specific plants, Nedopil says they’d apply in plenty of other countries.

“It’s true for many different countries, particularly the ones that have young power plants. So it’s not as true for Australian coal-fired power plants, for example, that are typically older and where the debt portion on the balance sheet is much lower.

“Refinancing would still be possible and interesting for older coal-fired power plants, but you’d have to use a slightly different mechanism to retire them early.”

Nedopil says that Chinese stakeholders have taken interest in the team’s coal phase-out research.

“China is the largest sponsor of coal fired power plants in Asia – not just in China, but also in non-Chinese Asian countries,” he says.

Read More
Energy
Origin, AGL… when will the next coal plants close?


But in 2021, President Xi Jinping announced that China would no longer be financing new overseas coal-fired power stations, and the country has rapidly increased its interest in renewables.

“I think there’s a momentum that even 5 years ago we didn’t think would have been possible,” says Nedopil.

“Now, putting that all into practice, and seeing real examples around this, I think will be very interesting. We’re still in the pilot phase. We have one or two early retirements of coal-fired power plants, for example, in the Philippines.

“But the scaling of this will be very tricky.”

Nedopil adds that replacing coal with renewables in Asian countries will not be a simple task.

“From a technical perspective, there’s growing electricity demand. And you can’t just put a wind farm or solar farm exactly where the coal-fired power plant is, because the conditions are not right.”

Then there’s employment: coal is a big employer in the region.

“Reducing the dependency on these jobs must also carefully be considered,” says Nedopil.

Fortunately, he says renewables are already a bigger employer across Asia than fossil fuels.

“This is quite a substantial developments over the last 5 years as well, that the green energy sector has already surpassed the brown energy sector in terms of employment.”
WWI REDUX

Russian tactics lead to devastation in both Ukraine and their own land

Story by PrzemysÅ‚aw Juraszek • 1d • 

The Russians bombed a school in Sudża.© Telegram, landforcesofukraine

Russians do not change their tactics of destroying cities, even if they are on their own territory. Guided FAB bombs are falling on Sudzha in the Kursk region, just like on Ukrainian cities. We explain what this weapon is.

As admitted by Ukrainians, Russians are bombing their own territory like any other, exemplified by the attack using a FAB glide bomb with UMPK modules on a kindergarten in Sudzha and numerous private homes.

The city, which had a population of about 5,000 people before the Kursk operation, has dwindled to about 200 residents. According to the Unian agency, Ukrainian soldiers are assisting. "They are destroying their own. Even though Sudzha is located in the rear, Russians are wiping it off the face of the earth: they are dropping guided bombs, shelling with artillery, and using kamikaze drones. On Friday, 30 August, a Russian bomb attacked the local kindergarten, and enemy planes struck homes in the private sector in Sudzha," reported the Ukrainian Armed Forces' Ground Forces on Telegram.
Russian guided bombs

Russian tactics for occupying territory in Ukraine and attempting to defend their own areas rely largely on aviation using guided FAB bombs with UMPK (Unified Planning and Correction Module) modules. They are highly effective because no field fortification can withstand their impact.

This forces Ukrainians to conduct a kind of mobile defence or stay under the umbrella provided by medium-range anti-air defence systems such as Patriot or SAMP/T, of which they have too few.

However, Russian tactics mean that every city they fight for quickly becomes a heap of ruins. It doesn't matter whether it's cities in Ukraine or in Russia itself, as seen in the case of Sudzha and other locations in the Kursk region.
FAB aerial bombs — simple but deadly weapons

In 2023, Russians began intensively using FAB aerial bombs with UMPK modules, which brought them many successes. The biggest was capturing Avdiivka with their help.

The FAB bombs with UMPK modules are a Russian copy of the American JDAM-ER glide bombs. They allow for the attack of targets more than 40 kilometres away from the drop point. This means that Russian planes can safely attack Ukrainian targets while staying out of range of numerous short-range air defence systems.

The UMPK modules contain foldable wings, a guidance section based on inertial and satellite navigation, and control surfaces. They are then mounted onto regular aerial bombs, creating precision weapons. Although Russian solutions are less precise than Western ones, they compensate for this drawback with greater destructive power.


Even if a bomb is missed by several dozen metres, the destructive effect of a bomb weighing 500 kg, 1,500 kg, or 3,200 kg is sufficient to destroy the target. The FAB-3000 variants containing just over 1,500 kg of TNT are particularly devastating, as the shock wave has an effective range of several hundred feet.