Sunday, September 08, 2024

Could Two New Docs Subtly Change the Presidential Election?

Steven Zeitchik
Sat 7 September 2024 


Adam Kinzinger had turned down more than a dozen requests to make a documentary. Then the director of Hot Tub Time Machine walked in.

The Illinois Republican congressman who famously — and largely solitarily — turned on Donald Trump after Jan. 6 was reluctant to participate in a movie that focused on his fading hopes to retain his seat. But Steve Pink, the aforesaid auteur of the jacuzzi, wanted to get more personal than that.

“Everyone else was interested in re-election,” Kinzinger said in an interview with THR as the Toronto International Film Festival was set to start Thursday. “But when I talked to Steve and the team their interest was in the human element — what’s the cost to you and your future kid?”

That conversation was more than two years ago. Now the resulting film, The Last Republican, could make an impact on more than just Kinzinger when it premieres at TIFF 2024 on Saturday. That film and Carville — a Telluride documentary about the maverick consultant James Carville and his long lonesome bid on the other side of the aisle to move the Democrats off Joe Biden — could thrust movies into the thick of the election. But how much are film companies interested in these stories — and will it matter in the grand voting scheme if they are?

Carville, at least, has answered the first question. CNN Films bought the movie (subtitle “Winning Is Everything, Stupid”) just before Telluride and will debut it on-air October 5 with an eye toward capitalizing on electoral interest. The Last Republican still seeks its own home when it plays for distributors this weekend, making the case that a good way to defeat Donald Trump is to popularize the backboned Republican who defied him. Submarine is handling sales on the film.

“Things are dark, Trump is still ascendant and shenanigans to call into question this year’s election seem inevitable,” Pink said in an interview. “And here’s someone who, even though his political views I abhor on a good day, lives by his beliefs in an active and tangible way. I think that will resonate with people.”

Both Republican and Carville could make a splash in the 2025 Oscar documentary race, which has seen scattered contenders but few runaway favorites. But the campaign impact could be even greater.

At a crowded screening Saturday afternoon that included a number of distribution executives, Kinzinger and the Last Republican filmmaking team took the Toronto stage to make their case.

“This is the wrong job if you’re scared to do the right thing,” Kinzinger told one questioner while also saying that the GOP has “lost its mind.”

Pink’s movie took shape when he and producer Jason Kohn, known for directing the Andre Agassi documentary “Love Means Zero” circa TIFF 2017, made their bid to Kinzinger that his story belonged on screen. And what a story it is: longtime Air National Guard pilot and conservative ideologue who spoke out against Trump’s role in January 6 and even joined the mostly Democratic Congressional commission, causing Republicans to shun him and eventually re-district him out of office.

A rapport even developed between Pink, an avowed liberal, and Kinzinger; the film suggests an odd-couple affability. “At some point this started to feel like the national Thanksgiving dinner we haven’t been able to have since 2016,” Kohn said wryly.

The filmmaker known for the temporal-shifting power of chlorine and the filmmaker who once told of tennis betrayals would not seem like obvious choices for an inside-Rayburn account. But the former’s sense of improbable story and the latter’s ability to capture a maverick serve them well. Kinzinger helps his own cause with a personality that is brash and often funny, a world away from Congressional starch even as he is facing death threats.

To MAGA Republicans Kinzinger is a Judas; to liberal Democrats he’s a martyr. But even as the 46-year-old courts attention — he did agree to the movie, after all — he says he is neither. “I’m not courageous. I’m just surrounded by cowards,” Kinzinger said in the interview, echoing a theme from the film.

For distributors, the calculus on Last Republican is a tricky one: they could buy the film now and see its value skyrocket if Trump wins. But if Trump is defeated on Nov 5, possibly for the last time, the film might be worth a lot less.

Should a distributor choose to take a flyer on a pre-election release, it could model for solidly Republican voters a way to go against Trump, depicting a man who still did so even though he paid with his career.

“Maybe I’m deluded but I think that a story can compete with Trump’s. Trump’s story is that Adam is disloyal, Adam is a RINO, Adam doesn’t represent his party,” Kohn said. “But I don’t think it’s unreasonable for a conservative audience to pick up on another story.” On Friday, Dick Cheney furthered that narrative when he added his name to the list of Republicans endorsing Kamala Harris.

A film release would also jolt viewers into recalling the attempted insurrection, depicted here in evocative detail, as well as the many mainline Republicans who quietly about-faced after first condemning Trump. (Former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy comes out particularly worse for the wear.)

A party’s dangerous groupthink is also the subject of Matt Tyrnauer’s “Carville,” which shows scene after scene from earlier in the year of its subject in vintage form, joyfully growling, cussing and eye-rolling over what he sees as the party’s dangerous deference to an unelectable incumbent. For months, that seemed to be an irrelevant message.

“It was almost a lost cause type of movie — you know, too late the hero,” Tyrnauer recalled in an interview.

The film was actually being screened for friends and family on the night of the fateful Trump-Biden debate in June. The minute the lights went on in front of Jake Tapper and Dana Bash, Tyrnauer knew he had a new ending on his hands. The film now ends with a pivot to Harris.

Still, Carville now runs the opposite risk — having been ahead of the curve for months, it could seem like old news. Carville and Tyrnauer say the movie — which also revisits its subject’s famous work on Bill Clinton’s 1992 campaign, his improbable marriage to Republican operative Mary Matalin and the generally colorful Louisiana personality always beaming from the airport TV — still carries a timeless message of both the shrewd game of politics and the nobility of public service.

But the principals also believe their film has a role to play as the campaign heats up. Tyrnauer said an explicit goal was to get it out before balloting begins, while Carville says he sees the film’s potential to influence voters’ 2024 behavior.

“I don’t know how many people watching it are going to change their vote, but maybe somebody’s gonna write 100 more postcards or maybe somebody’s gonna volunteer at a phone bank,” Carville said in an interview. “There are a thousand things people can do to get inspired. My hope is this movie inspires people to get involved with the election.”

A CNN spokeswoman, Jordan Overstreet, declined to comment on the network’s aims for the film.

The history of movies trying to shift electoral maps is a checkered one. “Fahrenheit 9/11,” Michael Moore’s blockbuster 2004 documentary that sought to get people not to vote for George W. Bush, failed in its main goal. But other modern documentaries from “Blackfish” to “Citizenfour” have succeeded in changing consciousness, and experts say that’s not hard to conceive of here.

“The idea that a filmmaker can make a difference on an election has been proven wrong — we’ve seen how that doesn’t work too many times,” said veteran documentary expert Thom Powers, who runs the doc section at TIFF. “What I think can happen is a film hits the zeitgeist in just the right way and can change how people think. The Last Republican and other films playing at this year’s festival have the potential to do exactly that.”

Kinzinger says he’s trying to keep his eye on something even bigger.

“If you fast-forward to 2124 and the administration of President Zarkon 3 or whatever we’ll call him, we’ll probably still be debating the same issues we’re debating now,” Kinzinger said. “But we can’t get there if the environment becomes one where people have lost faith in a system and even turn to violence because they think they don’t have a voice.”

The Hollywood Reporter

‘The Last Republican’ Review: Adam Kinzinger Makes an Engaging Doc Subject in Portrait of an Anti-Trump Conservative

Frank Scheck
Sat 7 September 2024 


It’s a sign of the truly bizarre political times in which we live that the new documentary about former Illinois congressman Adam Kinzinger was made not by any of the usual filmmaking suspects. The Last Republican, receiving its world premiere at the Toronto International Film Festival, wasn’t helmed by, say, Michael Moore, Errol Morris, or Barbara Kopple, but rather Steve Pink. It only makes sense when you find out that one of Pink’s previous directorial efforts, Hot Tub Time Machine, is Kinzinger’s favorite film. “It’s the thing that sold me,” Kinzinger jokingly comments, well aware of the director’s ultra-liberal leanings. “You have contempt for what I believe, in terms of political viewpoints,” he acknowledges.

Now that Kinzinger has become a media personality, best-selling author, and darling of the Democratic Party (he recently spoke at their national convention), it’s easy to gloss over how much courage he displayed in standing up for democracy. Ironically, that wasn’t the reason he was forced to leave office; rather, it was a redrawing of the congressional map, one that put him in deep MAGA territory, that led him to conclude he couldn’t win a primary.

The filmmaker clearly had generous access to his subject during the intense period after the events of Jan. 6 that led him to defy the majority of his own party. “I thought, naively, that there’s no way people aren’t going to wake up from this,” Kinzinger says about that infamous day. He blames Donald Trump, sure — but he blames Kevin McCarthy, who resurrected Trump’s political fortunes with his kiss-the-ring visit to Mar-a-Lago a few weeks later, even more. After all, he points out, Trump is “nuts,” but McCarthy, a canny political operator, knew exactly what he was doing.

Kinzinger admits that he had absolutely no desire to serve on the Jan. 6 committee. “I thought, dear Jesus, not me,” he recalls, but says that he couldn’t refuse when Pelosi tapped him, only learning about it from her appearance on a Sunday morning political show. She did call him in advance, he admits, but at 5 a.m. that morning, when he was asleep.

The hearings naturally form the centerpiece of the film, with the footage inevitably feeling ultra-familiar. (Anyone interested in watching this documentary probably consumed them avidly.) But the personal comments by Kinzinger and his wife Sofia — who vividly describes her anxiety watching the events of Jan. 6 in real time and fearing for her husband’s life — prove fascinating. She says that, after the gut-wrenching testimony by several of the Capitol police officers, she texted and advised him to tell the officers that they had prevailed. He complied, tearfully comforting them, “You guys won.” Naturally, his heartfelt emotionality was mocked by the likes of Newsmax and Tucker Carlson.

Kinzinger paid dearly for his courageous acts. We hear recordings of phone calls to his office in which people threaten him and his family members in the vilest language imaginable. He received a handwritten letter from 11 family members disowning him and telling him that he had joined “the devil’s army.” And he, along with Liz Cheney, was censured by his own party. He was eventually forced to have 24-hour security at his home. “Yeah, people want to kill me,” he comments in deadpan fashion. “It sucks, right?”

Kinzinger’s less familiar backstory proves fascinating, such as the fact that he was obsessed with politics from a very early age. He once dressed up as the Illinois governor for Halloween, and even turned his bedroom into a mock campaign office. As a child, he was a Civil War reenactor. “For the North,” he’s quick to point out.

An incident from his past provides evidence that his valor began early in life. As a young man, he impulsively intervened in a late-night incident in which a man was attempting to stab his girlfriend on the street. Kinzinger was unharmed in the resulting fight, although he thinks he still suffers from PTSD as a result. There’s even surveillance footage of the harrowing event, providing the sort of cinematic emotional hook that documentary filmmakers can only dream of.

The handsome, charismatic and extremely articulate politician proves a natural camera subject (there’s a reason he’s become a television staple) and self-deprecatingly takes pains to downplay his moral stance. “I don’t believe what I did was courageous. I think it’s just that I was surrounded by cowards,” he says.

He also fascinatingly relates how, after the impeachment vote, he attempted to persuade the other nine Republican congressman who voted alongside him to join forces and try to regain control of the Republican party by taking advantage of the suspension of corporate donations and Trump’s (temporary) exile. He sorrowfully says that the others instead went silent, resulting in a missed opportunity. It goes unsaid that we may pay the price for it this November.

The Hollywood Reporter


‘We’re in a constitutional crisis’: Adam Kinzinger warns of chaos at documentary premiere

Radheyan Simonpillai in Toronto
THE GUARDIAN
Sun 8 September 2024

Adam Kinzinger attends the premiere of The Last RepublicanPhotograph: Brian de Rivera Simon/Getty Images

Adam Kinzinger reiterated his support for Kamala Harris in the US presidential election at the Toronto film festival on Saturday, but warned that there may be more eruptions of violence should she win.

The former Republican congressman, whose party turned against him when he voted to impeach former President Donald Trump after the January 6 insurrection, was speaking to an audience following the world premiere of The Last Republican.

The crowd-pleasing documentary, with healthy doses of comic relief in its coverage of outrageous and tragic political events, follows Kinzinger for over a year as he endures the fallout from his efforts to hold Trump accountable for inciting the riots as part of the United States house select committee on the attack. The film is a portrait focusing on the costly personal sacrifice to do what both Kinzinger and the director Steve Pink repeatedly remind is simply the right thing.

After the screening, Kinzinger said history could repeat itself at a time when his party “lost its mind” but doesn’t believe the violence will play out in exactly the same way. The battle grounds won’t be Capitol Hill, according to the politician who recently spoke during a prime slot at the Democratic national convention, but individual states.

“Look at Arizona for instance,” Kinzinger said. “Assume Arizona goes for Kamala. But it’s a Republican legislature. The legislature has to be the one to certify Kamala as the winner. I can see a pressure campaign where these people simply will not vote to certify her the winner. And what happens then? We’re in a constitutional crisis. According to the constitution, if the state legislature decides, it’s just going to certify Trump, even if its [voters] went the other way, we have to accept that in the federal government … That’s a real concern I have. You can see violence at these statehouses that don’t have the security, we have. Our security got overrun that day for God’s sakes and we have 500 times the security that state houses do.”

The Last Republican is directed by Steve Pink, a self-described leftie who Kinzinger suspects has contempt for his politics. The film opens with Pink sharing his admiration for Kinzinger’s resolute stand – he was one of ten Republicans to vote for Trump’s impeachment, and the only one next to Liz Cheney to sit on the January 6 committee. Kinzinger reciprocates, explaining that he’s agreeing to ignore the ideological gap and take part in the film because Pink directed Hot Tub Time Machine, which he loves.

Pink’s first foray into documentary is a handshake between liberal Hollywood and a Republican that occasionally leans into odd couple comedy. The director and his subject rib each other throughout for opposing political beliefs that the film shies away from interrogating. At one point Kinzinger admits his pro-life stance, but his voice wavers a bit, hinting at the slightest opening that he could be swayed. During the same interview, Pink declares: “If this documentary helps you win the presidency and you enact horrible conservative policies, I swear to fucking god!”

His profile on the extremely charming Kinzinger certainly makes the case that the kid who once dressed up as Illinois governor Jim Edgar for Halloween and grew up practically indoctrinated into Republican politics would have made a decent presidential candidate. The film revisits a heroic act, when Kinzinger, in his 20s, rescued a bleeding woman from an attacker with a knife. The act of self-sacrifice, the film gently suggests, foreshadowed his recent actions.

The Last Republican doesn’t reveal anything particularly new about January 6 and Kinzinger’s work as part of the committee, but forensically revisits the damning moments before and after the attack. Kinzinger reflects on the Republican conference call, when Speaker of the House Kevin McCarthy says he would be voting against certifying Biden’s election win. Kinzinger says he warned McCarthy on the call that such an action could lead to violence. McCarthy’s response, which can be heard in the doc, was a dismissive “Ok Adam” before he called for the “next question”.

As The Last Republican cycles through testimony, McCarthy offers personal reflections and feelings about how things happened, describing January 6 as a bad bender that the Republican party should have woken up from and sipped water to cleanse its system and recover. Instead, they backed Donald Trump. “You could always fix a hangover by starting to drink again,” says McCarthy, tying up the analogy.

Kinzinger expresses that he was angrier at his old friend Kevin McCarthy than Trump. “He’s just nuts,” Kinzinger says of the latter.

He admits he wanted nothing to do with the January 6 committee. “Please dear Jesus not me,” he would say before Nancy Pelosi announced that she would be seeking his participation without calling him first.

Following the screening, Kinzinger tells the audience that almost every Republican congressman knows the 2020 election “wasn’t stolen” and “most of them would tell you that they think Donald Trump is crazy”. He adds that before impeachment, he believed there was going to be 25 votes in favor, instead of just the 10 who did, because many were too scared to take that stand. “I would have people come up to me all the time and say ‘thanks for doing it because I’ll lose in my district if I do it, but thank you.’” He’s exasperated by the gall of it.

Kinzinger not only lost his district but was bombarded with hate while ostracized not just from his party but his own extended family. In one scene, his mother Betty Jo Kinzinger recalls a phone call from an old community friend who tells her she doesn’t like Adam anymore. “You don’t have to like Adam,” she says, “but you don’t have to tell his mother that”.

In the film, Kinzinger’s staff can be heard sorting through the relentless phone calls to his office, ranging from angry voters to terrifying threats, deciding which calls should be referred to Capitol police. The vitriol is so much that they keep a cabinet near their desk filled top to bottom with what you would think is an apocalyptic supply of Kleenex boxes. The reveal elicited a hearty laugh from the audience. But the trauma behind it is all too real.

“Over time it takes a toll that you don’t recognize on you,” Kinzinger told the audience. He said that the threats we hear in the film aren’t just a tiny sample, reciting one caller who wishes Kinzinger’s son, who was six-month-old at the time, would wander into traffic and die.

“The people that call the death threats are probably not the ones that are going to come,” Kinzinger continued, who says he was swatted just a week before, a common occurrence when he speaks out. “The ones that are going to come are not going to let you know ahead of time that they’re going to be there.”

“I would always conceal and carry,” Kinzinger continued, “not because I’m just some crazy gun guy. But that was my way to defend myself in security … You’re living with security [with] your work. You always make sure to lock the doors and arm the system at night. But after a while I realized that I’m keeping distance from people. And I don’t want to be that way.”

When pressed about why it’s so hard for his fellow Republicans to question the party line and Donald Trump, Kinzinger said that many are just clinging to what they feel is their identity.

“When you see yourself as a member of Congress,” he said, “and you walk into any room, except the White House, and you’re the most powerful person there, and you have everybody’s attention, it’s really hard to walk away from that … I’ve learned that courage is rare … you have to walk away from your identity. And unfortunately, so many in the Republican party were unwilling and are unwilling to do that.

“Since we filmed this, there have been more people elected into the Republican party that actually are batshit crazy and truly believe some of this. So that’s a scary thing.”

The Last Republican is screening at the Toronto film festival and will be released at a later date

Surprised Republicans air frustration with Gonzales prediction of GOP losing House

AND THE SENATE TOO


Rep. Tony Gonzales’s (R-Texas) pessimistic prediction that the House GOP conference will lose its majority in November is sparking frustrations among Republican lawmakers, while underscoring just how competitive the race for the lower chamber will be this fall.

The surprise comments from Gonzales at the Texas Tribune Festival on Thursday drew widespread attention, breaking from the positive expectations other GOP lawmakers have publicly hammered home.

Privately, the remarks are making waves among House Republicans, who believe Gonzales’s surprise forecast is simply untrue, better kept to himself, and unproductive as rank-and-file members fight furiously to hang on to their edge in the chamber.

“Entirely unnecessary and not at all what we feel on the ground,” one Republican who represents a district President Biden won in 2020 told The Hill.

A second Biden-district Republican echoed that sentiment — “I think he’s wrong” — before tearing into Gonzales for airing his reservations publicly.

“Even if you believe that, it’s extremely unhelpful and counterproductive to the cause,” the GOP lawmaker wrote. “[T]he Members and seats that will decide the outcomes, are not going to be determined by the handful of folks who have undermined the majority. It’ll be determined by the members and the work they have done in their own district.”

“Well that’s a team player???” a third House Republican told The Hill in a text message. “Have you ever heard someone on a sports TEAM say that about their TEAM. Just disappointing.”

The cynicism from Gonzales, a border-district Republican, is fueled in part by irritation with the chaos that has been the 118th Congress, which began with a drawn-out Speaker’s race, came close to allowing a default on U.S. debts, and experienced the first-ever successful move to oust the House Speaker.

His public airing of grievances comes as Republicans are facing pressure electorally: while Decision Desk HQ gives Republicans a 56 percent chance of winning the House, forecasters have decreased the party’s chances of holding the House majority and forecasters say the chamber is essentially a toss-up. At the same time, the party is losing the cash dash to Democrats, who experienced a jolt of enthusiasm after Vice President Harris replaced President Biden at the top of the ticket.

“What’s frustrating me is I firmly believe that House Republicans are going to lose the majority — and we’re going to lose it because of ourselves,” Gonzales said in a discussion with Punchbowl News at the Texas Tribune Festival.

Gonzales, who was first elected to the House in 2020, knocked his party for its deep focus on impeaching Biden throughout this Congress, an effort that fizzled after the party failed to find a smoking gun against the president.

“Are we talking about some of these kind of kitchen table issues? No — it’s all about who we’re going to impeach,” Gonzales said.

“I get that part of our job is oversight — but it’s not the entire job,” he added.

The Texas Republican elaborated on his remarks in wake of the GOP pushback in comments to The Hill, standing by his concerns that the loudest message is coming from Republicans.

“House Republicans have good candidates and great members. If we can get our message back on track talking about our solutions to the failed Biden-Harris economy and security policies that negatively impact Americans, we are in great shape,” Gonzales told The Hill.

“The growing number of blue collar Americans who can’t afford to purchase a home. The rampant illegal immigration crisis which makes our communities less safe. If we show we are [the] party that can’t govern, nothing good will come out of it. It’s all about the message and the messengers,” he said.

But his GOP colleagues in the House — including members whose races will make or break the majority — disagreed with the analysis and criticized the move by Gonzales to publicly vocalize it.

“Sure, we are all frustrated, but handing over Congress to the [party that] plunged us into high costs and abandoned borders. Stay focused!” the first Biden-district Republican said.

Gonzales is no stranger to fiery ideological battles in the Republican Party. He overcame a primary challenge from the right earlier this year, called some of his conservative colleagues in the House “scumbags,” and was censured by the Texas Republican Party over his votes in favor of gun safety legislation and a bill to codify same-sex marriage protections.

The National Republican Congressional Committee Press Secretary Will Reinert had a two-word response to Gonzales anticipating the House flipping to Democratic control: “We disagree.”

That jibes with Speaker Mike Johnson’s (R-La.) messaging that Republicans will keep the House. During a call with Trump’s campaign on Friday, the Speaker predicted Republicans could have as large as a 13-seat majority next year if the party has a good night in November, a source on the call told The Hill.

Democrats need to flip at least four seats to regain control of the House. The DDHQ/The Hill forecast puts 10 districts in the toss-up category. Almost all of those are not in states that are competitive in the presidential race.

The second Biden-district Republican laid out the case for the GOP keeping the House, pointing to GOP gaining seats when Trump won 2016 and even when he was on the ballot but lost in 2020.

“[T]he map favors Republicans, the issues favor Republicans, and with Trump on the ballot, the base will come out,” the lawmaker said.

Rep. Larry Bucshon (R-Ind.), who is retiring from Congress at the end of the year, also pointed to past GOP performance in House races when expressing confidence about Republicans being able to win in blue-state races.

“House Republicans have outperformed President Trump … in congressional districts in California, New York before. So I think we’re in good shape,” Buschon said.

Buschon said that Gonzales might be responding to concerns he is hearing in his district.

“But that’s not what I’m hearing, of course, in Indiana and from my other colleagues, particularly my New York colleagues and California colleagues, who are pretty bullish on House Republicans right now,” Buschon said.

House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) also noted that the districts that will decide control of the House are much different than that of Gonzales.

“I love Tony, but you’re sitting in Texas wondering about what might happen. It’s a totally different world when you actually go to the districts where these battleground races are being held,” Scalise told Punchbowl News.

Still, Gonzales is not alone in his worries about the election, or in pointing the finger at the Republican party.

“I’m focused on my own race because the party isn’t focused on the issues that will help us win. Repeat of 2022,” one House Republican told The Hill. “We will not win nearly as many seats as we could have. We aren’t hammering our support for women. Each man for himself. Don’t wait on the party to save you.”

Other Republicans, however, are brushing off Gonzales’s outlook.

“Well, if he’s right… I’m sure house leadership will hold a well publicized fundraiser for him next year to ‘take back the majority,’” another GOP lawmaker told The Hill.

Copyright 2024 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. 

Post-evangelicals shift away from faith tied to Republican politics

Arit John and Dianne Gallagher, CNN
Sat 7 September 2024 at 7:00 am GMT-6·9-min read

Larissa Miller spent the early years of her life steeped in evangelical communities.

She attended an evangelical high school and college and spent more than 16 years working for the association tied to one of the best-known evangelists of the last century, Billy Graham. When Graham died in 2018, she produced the livestream of his 10-day memorial.

But by her late 30s she could no longer bury the feeling that her sexuality wasn’t compatible with the religious community she’d called home for most of her life.


“It was really hard to reconcile that, and to figure out, ‘Can I be gay and be a Christian?’” Miller, a 44-year-old director and producer based in Charlotte, told CNN. “It took many years, deconstructing and reconstructing, trying to figure out, ‘What is God telling me?’”

In 2021, Miller left her job, came out as a lesbian and married her wife. She’s now part of a community where her spirituality and sexuality aren’t in conflict: Charlotte’s Watershed Church, one of a growing number of “post-evangelical” institutions that have broken away – theologically and politically – from conservative places of worship.

Larissa Miller speaks to CNN during an interview. - CNN

Over the last few decades, a growing number of Christians have left traditional, predominantly White evangelical churches. Some have left Christianity altogether, while others have joined communities that preach inclusivity, are affirming of LGBTQ rights, and take a social justice approach to the major moral issues of the times – from racial equality to the plight of refugees.

The post-evangelical movement predates former President Donald Trump’s political rise, but has been accelerated by his alliance with White conservative evangelical leaders. It’s also part of a broader community of Christians who’ve been turned off by mainstream evangelicalism’s embrace of Republican politics – a group Democrats are hoping to make inroads with in November in battleground states.

There’s room to grow. In a Fox News poll released late last month that found Vice President Kamala Harris and Trump virtually tied in a head-to-head matchup, 79% of White evangelicals in North Carolina said they would vote for Trump, compared to 20% who would vote for Harris.

It’s not clear what post-evangelicals voting patterns are, though many of their political stances align with Democrats. At its core, however, the movement isn’t about encouraging people to vote for Democrats – if anything, they have urged people to decouple their partisan and spiritual identities altogether.

“The tension is not to become the rigid, judgmental reverse side of what you just left when it comes to evangelicalism or conservative,” said Matt O’Neil, the lead pastor at Watershed Church. “We create environments where people can come and ask questions.”

A shrinking voting bloc

The evangelical label covers a broad swath of Christian denominations and people of all races. But politically, the predominant image of an evangelical Christian has become a White conservative who votes Republican; opposes same-sex marriage and abortion; and, in the last eight years, supports Trump.

White evangelicals have been a key part of the Republican coalition since the 1980s. About 80% of White evangelicals voted for Trump in the 2016 election, while 76% voted for him in 2020, according to CNN exit polls. The exit polls estimated that 26% of 2016 voters and 28% of 2020 voters were White evangelicals.

But the voting bloc is shrinking. Between 2006 and 2023, the number of White evangelicals dropped from 23% to 13%, while the number of those with no religious affiliation rose from 16% to 27%, according to the Public Religion Research Institute’s 2023 Census of American Religion.



Attendees pray during a Commit to Caucus event held by former President Donald Trump's campaign in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, in December 2023. - Jordan Gale/The New York Times/Redux

Randall Balmer, an Episcopal priest and religion professor at Dartmouth College, attributed the decline in White evangelicalism in part to a growing generational divide between younger and older evangelicals before Trump’s political rise, fueled by different views on abortion and LGBTQ rights.

“For the older generation, they were really big into the anti-abortion movement, they were opposed to changes in sexual identity politics,” he said. “The younger generation, as I’ve encountered them … those were issues that just didn’t resonate with them.”

It’s unclear how many people have left the evangelical church for post-evangelical faith communities. The Post Evangelical Collective – a network of churches and academics – has about 100 member congregations on its website of various sizes spread across the country, primarily around major cities.

“There’s no question that the evangelical embrace of Trump from 2015 forward has definitely turbo charged the post-evangelical movement,” said David Gushee, a Christian ethics professor at Mercer University, post-evangelical and the author of “After Evangelicalism.”

Watershed, located in Charlotte’s historic Chantilly neighborhood, has a congregation of a few hundred people. On a recent Sunday morning the congregation gathered in a dimly lit auditorium for a service that, structurally, resembled a typical evangelical church, with worship music, announcements and a sermon.

But the updates included a recap of the church’s recent pride parade float and a reminder that Flamy Grant, a drag queen and Christian musician, would be visiting the church soon as part of her “No More Trauma” tour, a nod to the challenges faced by queer Christians. And the sermon challenged the idea of prosperity gospel, popularized by televangelists, which teaches that deep faith in God leads to physical health and financial wealth.

“We are loved,” teaching pastor Shawn Bowers Buxton told the congregation. “Loved in our feelings, loved in our brokenness, loved in our imperfection, loved in our wholeness, not healedness.”

O’Neil, the lead pastor at Watershed, said describing their church as “post-evangelical” has been helpful language for people who are still holding on to their evangelical roots but have changed their thinking in key ways.

While many of the church’s discussions center around politics in the broad sense, O’Neil warned against the dangers of Christians hitching their wagon to any candidate. White evangelicals’ embrace of Trump has left him “heartbroken,” he said.

“Evangelicals that wrap themselves in MAGA – my perception is that they’re afraid that something is happening in the world and they’re not able to keep up with it or they’re not finding traction with the way the world is unfolding,” he said.

Watershed Church in Charlotte, North Carolina. - CNN
Christians off the sidelines

Trump – a former Presbyterian who told Religious News Service in 2020 that he is a non-denominational Christian – has not leaned on his faith to the same extent as past US leaders. Critics have said his personal conduct – such as his divorces, his alleged affair with an adult film star and a verdict that found him liable for sexual abuse – are in sharp contrast with the evangelical emphasis on traditional family structures.

Evangelicals have also been frustrated over his changing stances on abortion access and his decision earlier this year to endorse a patriotic Bible – which includes the Declaration of Independence and other historic American texts alongside the holy scripture.

Still, Trump has maintained overwhelming support among White evangelicals since consolidating their support during the 2016 Republican primary. He has been endorsed by more than 1,000 evangelical leaders who’ve joined his “Believers for Trump” coalition, according to Karoline Leavitt, a campaign spokesperson.

The former president appeared in June at the annual “Road to the Majority” conference of the Faith & Freedom Coalition, a group with close ties to Republicans that works to boost turnout among conservative evangelicals. Trump endorsed the display of the Ten Commandments in schools and said Christianity would be in “tatters” if President Joe Biden, the former Democratic nominee, won a second term.

“The radical left is trying to shame Christians – silence you, demoralize you, and they want to keep you out of politics. They don’t want you to vote,” Trump said in June. “But Christians cannot afford to sit on the sidelines.”

The Faith & Freedom Coalition announced in March that it plans to spend $62 million boosting evangelical turnout through text messages, knocking on doors, sending out voter guides and holding registration drives at tens of thousands of churches.

Ralph Reed, the founder of the coalition, said the mistake Democrats make is assuming that voters of faith are focused on a candidate’s religious identity instead of the policies they’re backing.

“If that was true, they would have voted for Jimmy Carter in 1980, who was a born again Christian and who taught Sunday school on the weekends,” Reed said in an interview. “Instead they voted for Ronald Reagan, who was the first divorced man to ever be president.”

Reed said White conservative evangelicals are motivated by issues such as abortion and supporting Israel, but also “the strengthening and defense of the traditional family” and the belief that “traditional gender roles” are part of God’s plan. Post-evangelicals have a right to start their own churches, he said, but he pushed back on the criticism that the churches they left behind are too closely linked to Republicans.

“There’s a great respect for the understanding that Jesus and the gospel message are above any political party, any politician or any political ideology,” Reed said. “Now, having said that, we do believe very strongly that Christians should be registered to vote.”

Liberals are also seeking to gain ground with White evangelical voters. Evangelicals for Harris has launched a digital ad campaign to explicitly boost turnout for the vice president. The campaign also plans to organize at hundreds of churches.

State Rep. James Talarico, a Texas Democrat and surrogate for the group, said there is a fine line between participating in the democratic process and letting democracy drift into idolatry.

“I think the key difference is that we don’t worship Kamala Harris, we’re just voting for her,” he said. “A vote is like a chess move for a better world.”

Another group, Vote Common Good, is seeking to encourage White evangelicals and Catholics who are open to changing their conservative voting patterns to take that next step. The organization launched its fall bus tour in Georgia this month, with visits concentrated in the three “Blue Wall” states of Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania.

“If you watch Donald Trump’s behavior and you’re still for him, there’s nothing we’re going to say that’s going to get you to change your mind,” said Pastor Doug Pagitt, the executive director of Vote Common Good. “We’re talking about the voters whose minds have already changed, but they’re conflicted about their voting habit.”

A similar, but spiritual, shift has taken place for post-evangelicals like Miller.

“My heart already knew that I was loved and affirmed by God,” Miller said. “But I had to figure it out.”
PATRIARCHY IS MISOGYNY & FEMICIDE

How I escaped ‘trad wife’ hell: Abuse survivor hopes other victims find her book and run

Sheila Flynn
Sun 8 September 2024
THE INDEPENDENT UK

Tia Levings spent nearly 15 years in a marriage with an abusive Christian fundamentalist spouse before escaping with her children at the age of 33
 (Tia Levings / Hannah Joy Photography)

There was something frighteningly different about the violent energy that night – the way her husband abruptly left the house, the forces she felt telling her to run – that made Tia Levings finally bundle her four kids into the car and flee a man who hid abuse under the cloak of strict religion.

It was only as she passed her husband’s vehicle, his headlights pointing in the opposite direction – back towards the family home they’d just fled – that she realized he’d left to get the gun stored in his office.

“I was still driving; it was the middle of the night,” Tia tells The Independent, recalling with knife-edge clarity “the adrenaline of knowing that we just narrowly escaped the murder-suicide that I’d always feared.”


It was 2007, and Tia had lived for nearly 15 years in an increasingly fundamental Christian marriage. By the time she worked up the courage to escape, they were living in an unheated, isolated urban homestead in Tennessee – and her controlling spouse was forcing her to obey orders while calling him “my lord.”

Fast-forward a little more than a decade and a half, and Tia, now 50, is telling her story in a bone-chilling book – while simultaneously watching, with great concern, the continued glorification of the “trad-wife” lifestyle on social media and in pop culture.


Tia Levings, 50, spent from ages 19 to 33 in a fundamental Christian marriage, eventually escaping with her four surviving children (Hannah Joy Photography)

She knows firsthand that the back-to-basics idyll being sold far too often hides a dark and dangerous reality. And she hopes her book, A Well-Trained Wife: My Escape from Christian Patriarchy – which began as a journal to help Tia process her trauma – is getting into the hands of those women still trapped in the same types of life-threatening, open-air prisons.

“I [wrote] it for the woman in her kitchen who is washing dishes endlessly and doesn’t get to go to a bookstore and needs a book like mine, but she’s going to have to throw it in her cart at Target,” she says. “So I knew I needed a certain publishing path in order to reach her. I knew I needed a big publisher.”

She says readers are also helping. “They’re putting my book without its jacket in the little libraries that are around, and they are donating it, and they are sharing it reader-to-reader,” Tia says. “The story is getting out; it is spreading. And I think that there is so much power in that – you never know where it’s going to land.”

The story began far more benignly, with Tia and her parents joining a megachurch in Florida when she was an adolescent. There she was introduced to families following the Gothard movement, a fundamentalist ideology and way of living that was the brainchild of American minister Bill Gothard. The increasing number of Gothard families within her First Baptist congregation promoted homeschooling and could be spotted because the “women dressed like prairie wives, always pregnant and holding a baby,” she writes in her book.

Tia attended church six times a week and, after high school, was told the congregation only helped males advance to further education. So she instead prayed desperately for a husband and, when she met a sailor with a skull tattoo whom she calls Allan in the book, married him a year later – ignoring abusive and controlling red flags and even the advice of a church counselor who warned the couple of their total incompatibility.


Tia and her husband, who is called “Allan” in the book, welcomed five children, though they tragically lost a daughter born with a heart defect shortly after birth (Courtesy of Tia Levings)

Tia gave birth to five children – including baby Clara, who was born with a heart defect and survived just weeks – as Allan moved the family to more and more conservative congregations. Many fellow congregants were adherents of the quiverfull theology, which encourages large families and forbids any type of birth control or family planning.

On the outside, Tia attempted to project a happy family life, even running a successful website in the heyday of the mommy blog – discovering in herself a knack for writing and online content creation. Behind closed doors, Allan was threatening to kill her, leering that he’d take the kids “forever,” calling her a Jezebel and terrorizing Tia physically, mentally and emotionally.

It got worse as she began earning money and accolades for her blog work; Allan began drinking and doubling down on the abusive, patriarchal behavior. Tia tried to shield her children, but his insidious influence crept in as they aged; he traumatized their oldest by making him kill animals, and the same son struck Tia in a scuffle just hours before the then-33-year-old determined to leave – for her kids’ sake and her own.

She sought the help of a new, more progressive church – an Eastern Orthodox congregation they’d recently joined – and even went into hiding with her children until it was established that Allan was no longer a threat to them.

Her parents were also supportive; she’d hid from them for years how bad things were at home. Tia knows just how deceiving outward appearances can be, particularly when it comes to families projecting pious, traditional households – like those flooding social media as “trad wife” influencers.

“I see the trap,” she tells The Independent. “I see the lifestyle that is so all-encompassing that you can’t get out of it. I see the systematized denial of agency and options so that you might wake up one day and want to be out of it, but you’ve closed door after door after door so that there’s no one there to help you. There’s not a bank account to turn to. There’s no agency to just start asking questions or to change your life, if you decide you want something different.

“And that really underscores why this is not just an alternative lifestyle choice,” she says. “It is part of a movement.”


The family were living in a home they called the Blue House in rural Tennessee in 2007 when Tia finally worked up the courage to bundle her four kids into the car and flee the dangerous situation after years of ‘church-sanctioned’ abuse (Courtesy of Tia Levings)

It’s a movement that’s deliberate and strategic, dating back decades and beyond, and she says it’s chilling to hear echoes of proclamations made from pulpits during her childhood in the words of influential politicians today – “especially when JD Vance opens his mouth,” she says.

“He floats the ideas of women not voting; he floats the ideas of no-fault divorce … even though we know that having access to divorce has reduced suicides and domestic violence deaths,” she says. “He floats all of those agendas that are part of Project 2025, which is not anything new.”

The talking points are all there, Tia says. “They are often divorced from the theology that fed them, and I think that’s for a mass audience – but that’s also a good opportunity for someone who comes from that background to say, I know why they are teaching that, and I know what they intend to accomplish with it.”

She’s been hearing it since childhood, when ministers preached regularly against Democratic leaders like Bill Clinton and Al Gore.

“They were pretty open about this when I was growing up – preached it every Sunday,” she says. “We sat in sermons and they said, ‘This election might not go our way … but we have a strategy in place to take over the Supreme Court, and we’re going to get the justices in place, and we’re going to pick God’s man.”

She points to the many US lawmakers and politicians raised “in that viewpoint: That America is a Christian nation, and that we are supposed to have Christianity as a dominant faith and a dominant religion across the globe, and the leadership looks like a patriarchal white male – and women stay at home and raise children and they don’t have access to health care or contraception or equality or employment.”

Tia sees the appeal of the lifestyle on paper, however, as Americans, and particularly mothers, grapple with the multifaceted demands of daily life.

“When we’re exhausted, we turn to very simplified solutions, where fundamentalism can step in and say, Oh, are you tired? It’s because you’re working too hard. And the two-income family really doesn’t work, and women need to stay home,” she says.


Following her high school graduation, Tia inquired about getting financial help to attend a religious college but was told by a church leader: ‘We don’t spare that money for girls' (Courtesy of Tia Levings)

“And at the same time, that system is not advertising the outcome. They shut down the evidence, the testimonies, the science, everything that would say, This isn’t actually a good way to live. We’ve actually lived this way before.”

“That’s where a survivor can come in,” she says.

While she watched the mass popularity grow of reality shows featuring families like the Duggars, where she recognized tell-tale Gothard fingerprints, Tia was caught off-guard by the latest pop culture fad across TikTok and Instagram.

“I really did not see the trad wife social media movement happening, because there have been so many advances for women’s liberation,” she says. “The closest thing [that came] before was the mommy bloggers movement, which I was part of – so I thought we had kind of evolved past it. I was very surprised.”

The glossy content plugs into “this idea that there’s something better out there; life is hard,” Tia says.

“Maybe it speaks to … the very clear binaries of the gender roles, easy answers, the simple formulas,” she tells The Independent. “Sometimes it can just be comforting to watch, because we like process videos and we like pretty aesthetics, and we can tend to think it’s benign and that it’s not part of something greater.

“And some creators are not very plugged into the wider movement. They don’t understand how their work is contributing to this conversation … It’s easier to hold your phone and watch somebody make gentle cheese crackers with a smile on their face and unplug from society a little bit and hearken to what we think is a simpler time.

“They’re not representing the complexity of that age, either,” she says. “They’re showing one dimension of it.”

The current cascade of content can not only be personally triggering for Tia – though she consumes and deconstructs it for her work, writing and speaking about the ills of fundamentalism – but also sparks a range of other emotions.

“I do get angry when I see it celebrated, because it’s glorified abuse – and that’s angering, because there’s victims involved, and they’re usually voiceless victims, like children,” she says.


Tia says she’s written her book not only to tell her story but to encourage others to leave the situation -- as she speaks about and fights for equal rights (Courtesy of Tia Levings)

She’s well aware that, had technology evolved earlier, she could have been one of the aforementioned influencers herself.

“If I’d had social media, I would have been a trad wife social creator,” Tia admits. “I was good at blogging, and I was there when the movement was new. And complicity is something that everyone in recovery has to look at.

“Patriarchy needs women to perpetuate it, so it grooms our participation, and then it holds us there with the guilt of our complicity, and then we become perpetrators. So it’s like the cycle that just keeps going.

“And I had to definitely sit with the complicity of my mask, because I wasn’t presenting the truth of the situation either, not even to myself.”

Now, instead, she’s sharing her story with searing honesty – not just for the woman it might save at Target but for wider members of the community.

“I always call this the cult without walls, and the members are really used to being isolated in plain sight – so they will be your neighbors or someone you see at the grocery store or the park, and they feel alone and separate,” she says, “Try to connect, try to engage in conversation … because if they can trust you, you might be the one they ask for help when it’s time to get out.”
JUST A WEE BIT JEALOUS
Now Trump Has Decided He Is 'Very Offended' By Putin's Endorsement Of Kamala Harris

Kate Nicholson
Sun 8 September 2024 


Republican presidential nominee former President Donald Trump speaks during a campaign event at Central Wisconsin Airport, Saturday, Sept. 7, 2024, in Mosinee, Wis. via Associated Press


Donald Trump has spoken out, yet again, about Vladimir Putin’s endorsement of Kamala Harris.

The Russian president seemed pretty sarcastic on Thursday when encouraged his supporters to back her, bizarrely praising how the Democratic nominee and current vice president “laughs so expressively and infectiously”.

It’s widely expected that a second Trump administration would be much softer on Putin and his brutal invasion of Ukraine than another term of the Democrats, so it’s unlikely the Russian authoritarian meant what he said.

But the ex-US president, who has often spoken very highly of Putin’s “genius”, did not seem to see it that way.

On Friday, he seemed unsure about how to react, telling his fans in New York: “I don’t know exactly what to say about that. I don’t know if I’m insulted or he did me a favour?”

But, by Saturday, he was telling a rally in Wisconsin that he was “very offended” by Putin’s endorsement of Harris.

He said: “I knew Putin. I knew him well. And you know, he endorsed, I don’t know if you saw the other day, he endorsed Kamala. He endorsed Kamala. I was very offended by that.

“I wonder why he endorsed Kamala. Now, he’s a chess player.

“Should I be upset about that? Was it done with a smile? I think it was done maybe with a smile. Who the hell knows.

“No one is going to figure it out. They’re about 19 steps ahead of us, this whole Russia thing. Nobody was tougher on Russia in history than Trump.

“And the person who knows that better than anyone was Vladimir Putin.”

But, the Republican nominee still found time to defend Russia as a whole.

He dismissed new concerns from the US’s Justice Department that Russia is trying to interfere with the upcoming election, just as it did in 2016.

Trump told the crowd, “the whole world laughed at it this time” when the new fears were revealed earlier this week.

“Oh no, it’s Russia, Russia, Russia, all over again,” he said, according to The Hill. “But they don’t look at China and they don’t look at Iran. I don’t know what it is with poor Russia.”

“Russia would never have happened if I was president, attacking Ukraine, it would never have happened,” he claimed, and promised: “I will have that war finished, settled, before I get to the White House, as president-elect I will get that done.”

Trump has repeatedly claimed he can resolve the Ukraine war but has not explained how he intends to do so, sparking worries that he will allow Russia to formally seize the Ukrainian territory it is already occupying.




GUN CONTROL NOV. 5

Senator Warnock responds to JD Vance’s comments on Georgia shooting: Guns make us all ‘sitting ducks’

John Bowden
Sun 8 September 2024 

One of Georgia’s senators has responded to Republican vice presidential contender JD Vance after he referred to school shootings as a regrettable “fact of life” in modern society.
Raphael Warnock, who won a six-year term in 2022 after defeating a Republican challenger to secure his first full term in office, appeared on NBC’s Meet the Press on Sunday after a shooting in his state claimed the lives of two students and two teachers at a high school. Nine others were injured.

He was asked about the comments by Vance, which ignited a media firestorm and were seized upon by Kamala Harris’s campaign as the latest sign of Republicans’ refusal to address such horrific attacks in American schools. The Ohio senator, speaking at a rally in Arizona, lamented, “I don’t like that this is a fact of life” after the shooting took place last week.

“Listen, JD Vance claims that this random, routine carnage is a ‘fact of life’. No, it’s not. This is a fact of American life,” Warnock stressed to NBC’s Kristen Welker.

He added: “There are children that are troubled in other countries. This only happens here. It’s the guns.”

“In America, it’s not safe to be in our schools, it’s not safe to be in our shopping malls. … We’re all sitting ducks.”

Warnock is correct; the US experiences shooting incidents in schools at a number that is unmatched by any other country in the developed world. Homicide, with gun violence making up the lion’s share, is the second-leading cause of death for Americans under the age of 30.

Political debate in America after a mass shooting typically revolves around the roles of firearms in American society and whether the prevalence and availability of guns contribute to the US’s higher rates of gun violence compared to other developed nations.

Warnock, who represents a purple state in the deep south, took the position Sunday that no individual piece of gun control legislation would have stopped the Apalachee High School shooting while pointing to the overall number of guns in America as a reason for the higher rates of violence.

“A country that allows this to continue, without putting forth just common-sense gun safety measures, is a country that has in a tragic way lost its way.”

Warnock’s victory in 2022 (as well as sweeping victories for him and other Democrats just two years earlier) has emboldened Democrats pushing to turn Georgia into the first real crack in the red wall of the American South. The state is a top battleground for the 2024 election and hosted the first presidential debate between Donald Trump and Joe Biden in June before the latter dropped out of the race.

The shooting in Georgia’s Barrow County came after the 14-year-old suspect was reportedly gifted an AR-15-style rifle by his father despite a known history of suicidal and homicidal thoughts. Both the suspected shooter, Colt Gray, and his father remain in police custody following the attack.

Warnock says gun lobby ‘lines its pockets with the blood of our children’ after Georgia school shooting

Miranda Nazzaro
Sun 8 September 2024 
THE HILL




Sen. Raphael Warnock (D-Ga.) on Sunday took aim at some politicians whom he described as “beholden to the gun lobby” while lamenting his frustrations about gun violence in the wake of last week’s school shooting at a Georgia high school.

“The reality is that in America, it’s not safe to be in our schools. It’s not safe to be in our shopping malls. It’s not safe to be in the spa. It’s not safe to be in a medical clinic. We’re all sitting ducks,” Warnock said on NBC News’s “Meet the Press.”

And any country that allows this to continue without putting forward just common-sense gun safety measures is a country that has, in a tragic way, lost its way. Politicians need to realign their values.”

Warnock said there is “no one single law” to prevent school shootings when asked by NBC News anchor Kristen Welker.

“In a sense, I think we have to broaden the scope of the question because, after all, we have two mass shootings a day in our country, based on the data just last year,” he said. “And this does not happen everywhere in the world. The problem is that we have politicians in our country who are beholden to the gun lobby. And either based on ambition or fear, they go to work every day doing their bidding while the gun lobby lines its pockets with the blood of our children.”

The gun lobby is a term usually referring to state and federal efforts to influence gun policies, often in the form of supporting candidates who are against gun control measures.

The remarks come days after a gunman opened fire at Apalachee High School in Winder, Ga. last week, killing two students and two teachers.

The suspect, 14-year-old Colt Gray, was charged with four counts of felony murder.

“Listen, 14-year-olds don’t need AR-15s, and we need to get these military-style weapons off the streets,” Warnock said.

Warnock called for action in Congress, stating the few gun safety policies that have passed were “not enough” to prevent last week’s shooting in his home state.

“The best – the least we can do is move forward on the bipartisan spaces where ordinary people agree,” he said. “Clearly, there’s a disconnect between what the people, the American people want and what they’re able to get out of their government.”

He pointed to a Fox News poll taken in April 2023, which found 87 percent of voters are in favor of requiring criminal background checks for all gun buyers.

Copyright 2024 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


Tim Walz Lays Into JD Vance Over ‘Fact of Life’ Shooting Comments

Matt Young
Sun 8 September 2024

Kevin Lamarque/Reuters

Democratic vice presidential nominee Tim Walz took his Republican rival to task over his controversial response in the aftermath of the Georgia school shooting.

Walz made a speech during an appearance at the Humans Rights Campaign National Dinner–the nation’s largest LGBTQ+ civil rights organization–in Washington on Saturday night.

Walz took to stage to highlight his support for his running mate, Kamala Harris (“Yes, by the way, she’s more qualified than anybody that’s ever run for this office, let’s be clear”) along with the pair’s record on queer rights.

“I’m an old, straight, white guy, I’m teaching social studies, you’re all picturing the damn stereotype here. Turns out I’m opposite world of Tommy Tuberville though,” he said before describing his involvement with his former school’s gay-straight alliance.

Yet the Minnesota governor used the opportunity to namecheck more than just Tuberville.

“It’s a fact of life some people are gay,” Walz said. “But you know what’s not a fact of life? That our children need to be shot dead in schools. That’s not a fact of life.”


Vance told a crowd during a rally in Phoenix, Arizona, last week, that increased security was the answer to school shootings, rather than tougher legislation on guns.

Four people were killed and another nine injured last week after 14-year-old Colt Gray allegedly launched an attack on Apalachee High School in Georgia.

“I don’t like that this is a fact of life. But if you’re—if you are a psycho, you want to make headlines, you realize that our schools are soft targets. And we have got to bolster security at our schools… We’ve got to bolster security so if a psycho wants to walk through the front door and kill a bunch of children, they’re not able to,” Vance said.

“If these psychos are going to go after our kids we’ve got to be prepared for it,” Vance said. “We don’t have to like the reality that we live in, but it is the reality we live in. We’ve got to deal with it.”

JD Vance’s Staggering Comments After Georgia School Shooting

While the Harris-Walz campaign had already condemned Vance’s comments, Walz used his speech to reiterate, “Folks are banning books, but they’re okay with weapons of war being in our schools. Look, that’s not this country, it doesn’t have to be this way, it doesn’t happen elsewhere, we’re going to make sure our children are seen, they bring their authentic selves, then we’re going to make sure they’re safe when they get there, so thank you all,” he said.

Republicans however have supported Vance over his comments, claiming the criticism is driven by Democrats with an agenda.



Joy derision: Democrats turn Trump’s deadliest weapon against him

Martin Pengelly in Washington 
THE GUARDIAN
Sun 8 September 2024

‘They know it gets him mad,’ said Molly Jong-Fast.
Photograph: Jim Lo Scalzo/EPA


In Trump in Exile, her recent book on the former president’s life after losing power, the reporter Meridith McGraw describes how aides to Donald Trump set about destroying Ron DeSantis, the Florida governor who threatened to lure Republican voters away.

“One Trump adviser referred to Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals,” McGraw writes. “Rule number five: Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.”

Alinsky was a Chicago community organizer who died in 1972 but is still influential on the left and demonized on the right. Trumpworld put his fifth rule – which also says: “It infuriates the opposition, who then react to your advantage” – into concerted action.

DeSantis was ridiculed for his lack of height and his heightened sanctimoniousness but most effectively for his simple weirdness: a discomfiting public manner the Trump camp indelibly linked to an alleged incident on a donor’s jet in which, lacking a spoon, the governor chose to eat a cup of chocolate pudding using his fingers.

DeSantis disintegrated. Trump swept to the nomination.

With Joe Biden as his opponent, it seemed Trump would once again dominate with nicknames and ridicule, based on “Sleepy Joe’s” (even more) advanced age. But then Biden dropped out, and something unexpected happened. Kamala Harris and her running mate, the Minnesota governor, Tim Walz, turned fierce ridicule back on Trump and his VP pick, the Ohio senator JD Vance, deriding both for their simple weirdness: personal, social and of course political.

If polling is any guide, the tactic has worked like a dream.

To Molly Jong-Fast, a podcaster and MSNBC commentator now touring Politics as Unusual, a live show with the Republican operative turned anti-Trump organizer and ridicule merchant Rick Wilson, Trump, Vance and the rest of the GOP are simply easy targets.

“They’ve just gone so far afield, this Republican party, that you can mock it all because it’s just so weird,” Jong-Fast said. “All this stuff about women’s reproductive cycles” – support for abortion bans, Vance attacking women who do not have children, endless tangles over IVF – “that stuff is quite weird from an adult man, and so it does lend itself to mockery.

“I also think they got so high on their own supply that they didn’t pause and think, ‘Well, perhaps people won’t like this,’ you know?”

Ridicule certainly worked for Trump in the past. In 2016, the Texas senator Ted Cruz was “Lyin’ Ted”, the Florida senator Marco Rubio was “Liddle Marco”, and, most infamously, Hillary Clinton was “Crooked Hillary”. Fair or not, the labels stuck.

Eight years later, though, Trump “just can’t do it”, Jong-Fast said. “Maybe because he’s almost 80. Maybe because he just doesn’t have it any more.”

Trump has road-tested nicknames for Harris but nothing has stuck. He tried “Kamabla”, arguably racist, and “Comrade Kamala”, alleging communist leanings. He tried more.

Jong-Fast said: “‘Laffin’ Kamala?’ It just doesn’t do it because their whole plan of attack was that she laughs and somehow that makes her unserious, and being unserious is somehow bad for being president. But the problem with Trump is that his whole thing was that he was unserious, right? Like, you were supposed to vote for him because he was a reality television host, not because he was some genius.

“I think Trump is just tired. He’s been running for president for a decade, and he’s just scared [of defeat and potentially jail in four criminal cases] and sick of it. One of the things that Trump was able to do really well was ridicule. He would pick these nicknames and you would always be a little bit horrified by them but a lot of times they actually were right … he was very good at summing people up.”

Now, not so much.

Compounding Republican problems, under Harris and Walz – whose decision to call Trump and Vance weird on TV did much to put him on the ticket – Democrats have abandoned the political squeamishness, or just good manners, that long deterred them from firing back in kind.

“I think Biden was in a different generation of politics and he just couldn’t meet the moment in the same way,” Jong-Fast said. “He wouldn’t let his people do that aggressive stuff. I think of Democrats now as trying to push back aggressively, which they have to, right? I mean, it’s completely asymmetrical otherwise.”

As Walz led in ridiculing Trump and Vance, so party grandees followed. At the Democratic convention in Chicago last month, Barack and Michelle Obama mocked Trump from the podium. The former president even appeared to question the size of Trump’s penis. It was all a long way from “When they go low, we go high”, Michelle Obama’s 2016 appeal to purity of political action and thought.

“They know it gets him mad,” Jong-Fast said. “Part of what’s happening here is this ‘audience of one’ idea, which is they know it gets Trump kind of upset when you make fun of him, so they’re doubling down. They know the way to beat him is to get him so agitated that he acts out and alienates voters.”

Trump has certainly been acting out – and Jong-Fast’s colleague Wilson, a co-founder of the anti-Trump Lincoln Project, is well-practiced in making him do so, attracting threats to sue. Asked about Wilson’s insult-comic style, ridiculing Trump onstage and on the Fast Politics podcast and his own platforms, Jong-Fast laughed and said: “It makes for good podcasting. I think it would make for scary live television.”

Probably true. Nonetheless, live television will host the next huge campaign set piece, the debate between Trump and Harris on ABC on Tuesday. Ridicule seems sure to be on the menu. Saul Alinsky’s ghost will watch with interest.

Recently, David Corn, Washington bureau chief for Mother Jones, a progressive magazine, pondered Harris’s likely tactics.

“I would offer the same advice to Harris as I did to Biden,” Corn wrote. “Deride, deride, deride. But it looks as if she got the memo.”