Sunday, November 14, 2021

Protest over Hamilton’s encampment evictions causes city-wide service disruptions

By 

Published November 12, 2021 a

Members of the Hamilton Encampment Support Network set up outside 161 Studholme Rd — off of Aberdeen near Chedoke. They're demanding an end to the encampment evictions. (Photo credit @14forProgress on Twitter)

Dozen of individuals blocked the entrance to a City of Hamilton Public Works facility Friday (Nov. 12) in protest over the eviction of encampments on city propert

Members of the Hamilton Encampment Support Network set up outside 161 Studholme Rd — off of Aberdeen near Chedoke, and said they would remain there “all day.” They’re demanding an end to the encampment evictions.

The City says “approximately 30 staff and about 10 vehicles” were prevented from attending work-sites due to the protest. Staff at the Studholme building work mostly in the city’s Parks department, as well as Energy, Fleet & Facilities and golf. Some of the staff were scheduled to install the Christmas tree in Dundas on Friday, according to the City.

“WE WON!” tweeted Hamilton Encampment Support Network at around 2:30 p.m. “Thanks to everyone that joined us for our first labour stoppage picket, we shut down City facilities today responsible for carrying out encampment evictions for the day. Thank you to everyone today – we will continue to show up in numbers and keep up the fight.”

“The City respects people’s right to peacefully protest, but must also ensure the safety and respectful treatment of city staff in their workplace,” Shantz said. “The majority of staff at the location were sent home. The remaining staff were redeployed to other work and work locations today.

The clearing of encampments from city property was permitted after a Superior Court ruling on Nov. 2. An attempt by the Hamilton Community Legal Clinic (HCLC) to get an interim court injunction preventing the city from tearing down the tents failed.

Encampments and a lack of affordable, rent-geared-to-income housing have been a hot issue among residents, members of city council, social activists, and unhoused people throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.

The city maintains that it will not ticket individuals who are unsheltered unless they ignore what the city deems as “appropriate alternative options.” Then a trespass notice will be issued — placing the enforcement responsibility on the shoulders of the Hamilton Police Services.

To date, 12 individuals and couples accepted the shelter spaces that were offered, according to the City.

“At times, individuals may decline an offer of shelter initially or not arrive at the shelter for different reasons,” said Shantz. “Outreach staff remain engaged with these individuals and continue their outreach activities and offers of support with shelter, referral to community supports, and developing housing plans.”

She added, “An encampment site is only scheduled to be cleared once everyone at that location has been assessed, once everyone has been offered safe and appropriate indoor space, when available; and notice has been provided to give people time and help to collect personal belongings.”

City staff says it is planning to bring a report to the Dec. 7 Emergency & Community Services Committee that will provide more details about the planned transformation of the shelter system, capacity, and winter plans.

Demonstration at Hamilton public works yard after failed legal battle to prevent encampment removal

By Don Mitchell Global News
Posted November 12, 2021

Members of the Hamilton Encampment Support Network held a solidarity picket Nov. 12 outside one of the city's public works yards. @HamOntES

A number of advocates for Hamilton’s homeless population held a solidarity picket at the city-run parks and recreation facility on Friday, just days after a court action failed to stop the city from potentially dismantling small encampments in parks.


Members of the Hamilton Encampment Support Network (HESN) gathered at the public works yard on Studeholme Road, near Chedoke Golf Course, to stop trucks they say are responsible for carrying out encampment evictions for the day.

“Since the failed injunction, we’ve seen a rapid escalation of teardowns with the idea of making homelessness disappear,” a speaker said at the demonstration.

READ MORE: City of Hamilton to resume enforcement of encampments following win in court

“Encampment residents are forced to disappear into the escarpment away from their own communities where they are in a lot more danger than where they were.”

A spokesperson for the city of Hamilton confirmed 30 staff and about 10 vehicles were prevented from attending work sites as a result of the protests.

“The city respects people’s right to peacefully protest, but must also ensure the safety and respectful treatment of city staff in their workplace,” senior communications officer Michelle Shantz said in an e-mail.

“Majority of staff at the location were sent home. Remaining staff were redeployed to other work and work locations today.”

The demonstration comes after Superior Court Justice Andrew J. Goodman ruled against a group of homeless residents seeking a permanent injunction to prevent the City of Hamilton from moving homeless residents from city parks.

The same day as the court decision, the city issued a release saying it would be resuming enforcement of park bylaws.

In making his decision, the judge said evidence brought forth by counsel at the hearing demonstrated the city “continues to undertake reasonable steps in order to make available safe shelter space and accommodation.”

Over two days, Oct. 21-22, Goodman heard verbal arguments from counsel using written testimony from the likes of doctors, residents and outreach staff connected to the encampment issue.



Counsel for the city argued that the installations in city parks were causing tens of thousands of dollars in damage to trees, grass and other permanent structures in addition to propagating safety issues, unauthorized use of electricity and calls to clean up discarded needles and drug paraphernalia.

The applicants suggested the city has not created any new shelter space for the homeless, citing recent dates in mid-October when the director of housing services stated the system didn’t have enough beds on a given night.

Since the decision, the city says outreach staff have offered 40 people from encampments spaces in shelters or hotels.

Only 12 individuals and couples have accepted the offer to date.

“At times, individuals may decline an offer of shelter initially or not arrive at the shelter for different reasons,” said Shantz.

“Outreach staff remain engaged with these individuals and continue their outreach activities and offers of support with shelter, referral to community supports, and developing housing plans.”

As of Nov. 2, the city says there are 507 emergency shelter beds in Hamilton.

The (HESN) is demanding an end to encampment teardowns — and that the resources be redirected into the creation of affordable housing.
Protest in support of encampment residents in Hamilton stops city staff from working

About 30 staff and 10 vehicles were ‘prevented from attending work sites’ the city says

Merima Menzildzic, left, and Eshan Merali, both volunteers with the Hamilton Encampment Support Network, stand in front of the site Friday. (Aura Carreño Rosas/CBC)

With winter coming soon and the teardowns of encampments continuing over the past week, the Hamilton Encampment Support Network (HESN) and other supporters of encampment residents upped the ante Friday to prevent city workers from dismantling the make-shift housing that has popped up in parks across the city. 

About 30 people gathered Friday outside a city public works facility near the Chedoke Golf Course, preventing vehicles from exiting the facility. 

By mid-afternoon, HESN said, workers left the facility and it closed for the day, and the network declared success in delaying evictions.

"We picked this location as a way to delay an encampment eviction, even if for a day," said HESN volunteer Eshan Merali. "We were told that evictions were going to be ramped up to the point of being completed by today."

In a statement from the city, it said "approximately 30 staff and about 10 vehicles were prevented from attending work sites" Friday, including some from parks and energy departments. 

People gather outside a public works site in Hamilton on Friday, Nov. 12, 2021, in support of encampment residents. (Aura Carreño Rosas/CBC)

Throughout the day, some protesters played games of chess, others shared food, played music or made speeches, as they stood in solidarity with encampment residents.

HESN volunteer Merima Menzildzic said part of frustration has been over whether shelter space is available. The city has said that there are spaces, she said, but "the reality on the ground is that people are being told there are no shelter spaces," she said, adding that a lot of spaces available are not accessible for some individuals or would separate families.

Protesters were also hoping to start a dialogue with city workers. "We want to let them know that they have the right to refuse this work," said Merali.

Menzildzic agreed. 

"This kind of position that they put workers in where [they] come in to remove belonging to evict people only to have the city not actually respond in a meaningful way is also work that workers can reflect on and take action to refuse to do."

Teardowns happening since court decision 

Last month, five people who had lived in encampments were named in an application to Superior Court seeking an injunction to stop the City of Hamilton from tearing them down.

On Nov. 2, Justice Andrew Goodman ruled the city can enforce its bylaw against tents in public spaces, prompting disappointment from some encampment residents and from the Hamilton Community Legal Clinic. 

"There remains a segment of Hamilton's population, the most vulnerable, who have nowhere else to go," the clinic's statement read. 

Since then, a number of teardowns have been reported, included last weekend in Woodland Park and earlier this week at Jackie Washington Park. However, these evictions have not stopped new encampments from emerging again at the same parks, HESN says.  

"We've noticed that even the encampments that were cleared last week have started popping up again," said Menzildzic, "because people don't have access to the shelter spaces."

Stephanie Cox, with the Hamilton Community Legal Clinic, shared concerns over the fact that the city does not have a plan to protect people during the winter. 

"The city has not developed their winter response to homelessness policy, which is very concerning given that the cold is here and the city has been aware of their inability to meet shelter demands for months," she said in an email to CBC Hamilton. 

Cox said encampment residents have reported to the legal clinic that the city's housing outreach team has not engaged them and they are not receiving notices of bylaw infraction. Instead, she said, bylaw staff enter parks, and take away tents and belongings "and the homeless person is left standing with nothing and nowhere to go."

"This is traumatizing for them and places them at risk of death for a myriad of reasons including exposure to the harsh elements and a loss of connection to doctors that provide proactive lifesaving treatment," she added. "It does not have to be this way. The city can exercise its powers to stop bylaw enforcement." 

Range of work prevented

The city released a statement Friday afternoon acknowledging the actions at the public works facility, and said some of the staff whose work was prevented included those who cut grass, collect garbage in parks and workers who were due to install the Christmas tree in Dundas on Friday. 

"The city respects people's right to peacefully protest, but must also ensure the safety and respectful treatment of city staff in their workplace. Majority of staff at the location were sent home. Remaining staff were redeployed to other work and work locations today," its statement read. 

Chris Fairweather, with CUPE 3906, shows his support at the protest in support of encampment residents. (Aura Carreño Rosas/CBC)

As for its approach for encampment teardowns, the city "continues to take into consideration the safety and well-being of individuals experiencing homelessness," it said, adding that it continues to enforce its bylaw that prohibits camping in public spaces. 

"With respect to available shelter space and where individuals are going, the Housing Services' Housing Focused Street Outreach Team connects with unsheltered individuals, regardless of their circumstances, to assess their immediate individual needs and housing preferences and available supports in the community."

Since Nov. 2, according to the city, 40 people from encampments were referred to available spaces in shelters or hotels. "To date, 12 individuals/couples accepted the shelter spaces that were offered," it said. 


OUTSOURCING IDEOLOGY TRUMPS FACTS

Toronto OKs private garbage collection deal despite lacking waste diversion stats

City staff won't provide diversion comparison between

 public, private operations until January

Green For Life is set to take over waste collection in Etobicoke following a vote by city council on Friday. (Ben Nelms/CBC)

Toronto city council has approved a contract with Green For Life (GFL) worth some $88 million for waste collection in Etobicoke despite not knowing how the private company compares with city workers when it comes to waste diversion.

Coun. Kristyn Wong-Tam sought to delay the deal until waste diversion figures were available — city staff have been asked to provide that information by January — but councillors voted 14-9 against her motion.

Council then voted 19-4 to go ahead with the deal with GFL, which will soon handle all collection west of Yonge Street.

CBC Toronto was first to report the city is now spending the same per household for city-run and private waste collection

Currently, GFL and Miller Waste Collection, the private company serving Etobicoke now, are paid a combined $33 million to serve about 230,000 households west of Yonge Street, city staff confirmed in an email. 

It costs the city $33 million to have its own crews collect waste from 237,000 homes east of Yonge Street. 

The cost comparison isn't exactly direct — city staff note the west end has more operational challenges, including more collections on narrow streets, one-ways and even laneways — but it led to some sharp questions on the council floor Friday about whether or not the city should reconsider its decision to privatize some of its waste collection. 

Coun. Gord Perks said the city can no longer compete with GFL because it sold off its garbage trucks. As a result, he warned, the city could soon be paying more for privatized waste collection than if it did the work itself.

"We are making ourselves a captive market," said Perks, who represents Ward 4, Parkdale-High Park.

But others rejected that. 

Coun. Jennifer McKelvie, who heads the city's infrastructure and environment committee, noted the decision was made last year to push ahead with privatized waste collection in Etobicoke last January, maintaining a system that has been in place for years now. Mayor John Tory, meanwhile, highlighted city staff's point that it's too late to move to in-house collection for Etobicoke at this point. 

Don't mess up what's working: Etobicoke councillor

Coun. Stephen Holyday, who represents Ward 3, Etobicoke Centre, says his residents just "want the garbage gone" and are happy with privatized service. He urged his council colleagues not to mess that up.

Deputy Mayor Denzill Minnan-Wong, meanwhile, asked his colleagues to cast their mind back to the dirty, smelly garbage strike — a key moment in the city's decision to push ahead with privatized waste collection under former mayor Rob Ford.

"I can understand why my friends on the left don't want to mention this," he said.

GFL's winning bid was some $5 million cheaper than its nearest rival, Miller. The company is paid per tonne for the waste that it collects, city staff have confirmed.

Michael Taube: Doug Ford's pitch to union workers isn't crazy and it just might work

What seems like an impossible alliance on the surface has been made possible during the march of history

Author of the article: Special to National Post
Publishing date:Nov 12, 2021 
Ontario Premier Doug Ford, with Unifor President Jerry Diaz at left, announces a provincial minimum wage increase to $15 an hour, in Milton on November 2, 2021
. PHOTO BY PETER J. THOMPSON/NATIONAL POST

Ontario Premier Doug Ford recently announced the provincial minimum wage will be raised to $15/hr starting on Jan. 1, 2022. The decision was an important one, but it was something else that happened during the press conference that day that garnered far more attention.

It was the stunning visual of Ford, the Progressive Conservative Premier, being flanked at the dais by two prominent union leaders, OPSEU’s Smokey Thomas and Unifor National’s Jerry Dias.

Wait, what?

Hell must have finally frozen over. Maybe we’ve reached the point of Armageddon. Was that the Four Knights of the Apocalypse I saw riding over yonder?

All joking aside, the mere sight of Ford, Thomas and Dias standing together caused plenty of consternation on the political left and right. The former couldn’t understand how two union leaders would endorse someone like Ford, whereas the latter couldn’t believe Ford would want to stand in such close proximity to them.

Ah, but there’s more to this story than meets the eye.

This is another classic example of people missing the boat on several fronts. They’ve either forgotten about past political history, were oblivious to an emerging modern political strategy — or, more than likely, both.

Conservatives and the working class have actually found common ground from time to time. It’s far from a natural alliance, and is often an uneasy, frustrating relationship. Each side has vastly different opinions about politics and economics, and have separate sets of goals, priorities and ambitions.

Nevertheless, what seems like an impossible alliance on the surface has been made possible during the march of history.

The old Progressive Conservatives and Reform Party both had support among Canadian blue collar workers due to red tory ideas and western populism, respectively. American union members occasionally supported liberal Republicans like New York’s Jacob Javits and Massachusetts’s Edward Brooke, and voted for GOP presidential candidates like Dwight Eisenhower, Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan. There’s also a pro-labour group in the UK Tories, the Conservative Workers & Trade Unionists, that’s had some notable success in reaching out to working people.

Ford, whose philosophy combines small “c” conservative sensibilities and populist thinking, fits in with this historical lineage. Yet, he’s far from the only modern conservative politician to have recently attempted to re-establish this old, long-forgotten link.


Ginny Roth: O'Toole's conservatism isn't a shift to the left


Conservative leader Erin O’Toole promoted the need for closer ties with the working class during this year’s federal election. UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson used his one-nation conservative philosophy, which harkens back to a paternalistic society where social and economic programs help ordinary people, to win plenty of union votes in the 2019 general election. Former U.S. President Donald Trump’s pitch in the 2016 election to blue collar workers in the form of the forgotten man and woman worked wonders for his campaign, too.

Is it the right strategy to take, however? One of the main concerns of right-leaning thinkers is that any attempt to rebuild the Conservative-working class relationship could end up watering down the entire political philosophy. I’m certainly among them.

Yet, there’s no reason why this relationship can’t be restructured to give working people and card-carrying union members a bit of confidence that Conservatives can be allies sometimes, and not enemies all the time. It would also give Conservatives an opportunity to establish new ties with the working class that could result in more votes, seats and opportunities to form government.

Constructing a political bridge between Conservatives and the working class that won’t immediately fall apart is a tall order, indeed. If it’s going to succeed, the key is to spend far less time worrying about vast policy differences and focus instead on identifying some clear-cut, previously hidden or newly crafted similarities.

Ford’s decision to increase the minimum wage, which he had rejected when Kathleen Wynne was Ontario premier, is one example. Conservatives firmly believe in free markets and private enterprise, but the financial well-being of workers and their families can also be fiscally conservative in nature. How? The more economically secure they are, the more confident they will be to participate in a growing and flourishing economy through saving and spending their hard-earned money. Increasing wages on a small, gradual basis could achieve this goal.

Defending a country’s economic interests is another possibility. Most Conservatives reject economic nationalism and anti-free trade rhetoric, but they, like union leaders, don’t want to see the country obliterated when signing trade agreements. Hence, free trade and fair trade principles could work hand-in-hand to protect industries like forestry and the auto sector, create more good-paying jobs and ensure a country’s economy remains industrious, competitive and profitable.

There’s also a realistic vision for workers’ rights. Conservatives champion individual rights and freedoms, and there’s no reason the working class shouldn’t be a part of it. Emphasis on serious, thoughtful discussions on working conditions, maintaining strong lines of communication between workers and owners, and defending a democratic voting process in organized labour without pressure from outside sources, would all make sense.

It will take time, effort and a creative game plan to inject Conservatism with a pro-labour twist. If it ever comes to fruition, a re-established link between Conservatives and the working class would be one of the most important developments in modern political warfare.

Michael Taube, a columnist for Troy Media and Loonie Politics, was a speechwriter for former Conservative Canadian prime minister Stephen Harper.


Marx concludes that as value is determined by labour, and as profit is the appropriated surplus value remaining after paying wages, that the maximum profit is set by the minimum wage necessary to sustain labour, but is in turn adjusted by the overall productive powers of labour using given tools and machines, the length of the workday, the intensity of work demanded, and the fluctuating prices of commodities such as metals and foodstuffs which determine how much a worker may purchase with wages expressed in money.


Thirdly. Trades Unions work well as centers of resistance against the encroachments of capital. They fail partially from an injudicious use of their power. They fail generally from limiting themselves to a guerilla war against the effects of the existing system, instead of simultaneously trying to change it, instead of using their organized forces as a lever for the final emancipation of the working class that is to say the ultimate abolition of the wages system.

Waterloo Deere workers give 3rd tentative agreement a frosty reception

AMIE RIVERS CARA SMITH
Nov 13, 2021

UAW Local 838 workers stand on the picket lines outside of the John Deere Foundry in Waterloo on Saturday.


Members of the United Auto Workers strike outside of the John Deere Engine Works plant on Ridgeway Avenue in Waterloo on Oct. 15.
Bryon Houlgrave, The Des Moines Register via AP

AMIE RIVERS CARA SMITH
DES MOINES REGISTER, IOWA

Temperatures didn't get above 40 degrees in Waterloo on Saturday. But it was the frosty reception from Deere and UAW leadership that chilled striking Local 838 workers to the bone.

Deere & Co. and union officials reached a third preliminary contract agreement, it was announced Friday night, and workers who began striking four weeks ago will vote on it soon.

But while striking workers hadn't yet seen the latest offer or gotten a "highlighter" sheet from UAW leadership, picketers said they heard it wasn't much more than the company's second offer. That was rejected by a wide margin in Waterloo -- home to 3,100 of the 10,100 total striking workers.

"We just want higher wages," said one picketer. "They can get rid of that ratification bonus."

The United Auto Workers said in a statement Friday night that the proposed contract with the agricultural machinery giant “includes modest modifications" to the latest rejected proposal, which included immediate 10% raises. The union described the new proposal as the company’s “last, best and final offer” in its statement.

But those on the picket lines in Waterloo on Saturday said they thought the company was not "bargaining in good faith," pointing to a recent letter sent to dozens of Waterloo-area business and community leaders (https://wcfcourier.com/news/local/john-deere-manager-lays-out-latest-offer-to-uaw-in-email-to-local-leaders/article_9319b766-0300-51bc-b747-9199144d87a9.html) from the John Deere Waterloo Works factory manager touting Deere's latest offer.

People are also reading…
Waterloo brothers organize informational picket outside Deere headquarters

UAW members said Deere was misrepresenting how much workers were paid, including CIP pay, or pay for meeting quotas that they say Waterloo workers don't routinely get because of shortages. If the latest offer didn't address that, picketers said, the local will vote it down again, undeterred even as winter creeps in.

"Even with the gains that we made (in the most recent offer), it doesn’t really make up for what we've lost the last 24 years," said another worker, saying they thought Target Distribution workers make more up front. "I think (Deere is) interested in making that known that they've offered quite a bit, but I guess we don't feel like that."

The contract, which union members will vote on Wednesday, would cover more than 10,000 Deere workers at 12 facilities in Iowa, Illinois and Kansas, who make the company’s iconic John Deere green tractors and other equipment.

Deere officials had no comment.

The modified agreement isn’t just a tentative agreement, according to a release from Brian Rothenberg, spokesperson for the UAW. With the second tentative agreement, Deere announced it was their “last, best, and final offer” after the vote. This time, Deere officially declared this the last, best and final offer at the negotiating table, which could potentially trigger legal action, Rothenberg said.

“I know it's caused a lot of confusion,” Rothenberg said. “I've had people say, ‘Well, you know, is it a tentative agreement?’ Well, yes, it is. But it just has a different connotation to it if it goes down.”

James Cooney, employment law expert at Rutgers University, said although declaring best and final offers isn’t unheard of, it doesn’t take place in every labor negotiation.

“Employers often claim to be making a last, best, final offer as leverage in bargaining to try to intimidate the union,” Cooney said.

Cooney said an official best and last offer could signify Deere is at an impasse in negotiations. The National Labor Relations Board requires an employer and unions to actively negotiate on employment terms “until they agree on a labor contract or reach a stand-off or 'impasse.'” An impasse is a total breakdown of the bargaining process that occurs after good-faith negotiations have been exhausted, according to the NLRB.

“That's not an agreement with the company when saying ‘Hey, this is our last, best, final offer,’” Cooney said. “A union may take that back to the membership but, on the other hand, may choose not to, especially if it's perceived as more of a threat. And that's why there's probably more going on behind the scenes than certainly I'm aware of, on both sides.”

If they are truly at an impasse and the union votes this offer down, Deere has the ability to implement the terms of it with employees working during the strike, Cooney said. Workers would be expected to continue their strike even if the agreement is implemented for remaining employees.

“If there is a true impasse, the law does allow an employer to unilaterally impose the conditions, but very often, there's not a true impasse and a third party such as the National Labor Relations Board might disagree that there was no further room for bargaining,” Cooney said.

The UAW could file an unfair labor practice charge with the NLRB if the new agreement is implemented, he said.

In such cases, NLRB investigates, and if a company is found guilty of refusal to bargain, the NLRB can restore the old agreement and force the parties back to the negotiating table.

But if the NLRB decides the parties are at a true impasse, the company is legally allowed to implement the new agreement and hire replacement workers.

“It depends on so many moving parts,” Cooney said.

To keep negotiations open, Deere and the UAW could bring in a third-party mediator, like someone from the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, if they haven’t already.

“I hope the parties would be open to a mediator getting involved,” Cooney said. “But that's really up to them.”

Photos: UAW Local 838 members strike Monday outside Waterloo John Deere facility



Members of the United Auto Workers strike outside of the John Deere facility Monday on West Commercial Street in Waterloo, Iowa.



Thirdly. Trades Unions work well as centers of resistance against the encroachments of capital. They fail partially from an injudicious use of their power. They fail generally from limiting themselves to a guerilla war against the effects of the existing system, instead of simultaneously trying to change it, instead of using their organized forces as a lever for the final emancipation of the working class that is to say the ultimate abolition of the wages system.


Cargill labour dispute could heat up beef market as union issues strike notice

Jason Herring
Publishing date:Nov 11, 2021 
A sign is shown outside the Cargill facility in High River, AB, south of Calgary
 on Wednesday, May 6, 2020.
 PHOTO BY JIM WELLS/POSTMEDIA

Workers at a Cargill plant outside High River will hit the picket line in less than a month if a deal with the company cannot be reached, according to their union.

It’s a labour dispute that could inject even more uncertainty into a beef market already seeing soaring prices in North America amid global supply chain snarls.

The United Food and Commercial Workers Local 401 said it served a strike notice to Cargill representatives at a Wednesday negotiating meeting in Calgary. The notice said the union will strike beginning Dec. 6 unless a deal is reached on a new collective agreement.

In a vote the previous week, 97 per cent of about 1,400 workers who cast ballots were in favour of taking strike action amid a stall in bargaining.

Union spokesman Scott Payne told Postmedia at the time members were frustrated with a lack of movement toward an agreement, after the previous contract expired at the end of 2020. He said the union wants a new deal to address concerns around health and safety, including issues related to COVID-19, as well as movement within the company and wages.

The High River facility is the largest in the country and accounts for roughly 40 per cent of Canada’s beef processing capacity. According to Cargill’s website, the High River plant employs more than 2,000 people across two shifts and processes about 4,500 head of cattle daily.

A strike, if it occurs, would come as red meat touches record prices. It’s the latest example of workers flexing new-found leverage in a company critical to food supply chains.

That could mean a drop in packaged beef on store shelves as well as more “meatflation.” Farmers will also likely have to hold onto their animals longer, which increases production costs.

In a statement from Cargill spokesman Daniel Sullivan on Thursday, the company said it has exchanged proposals with the union, which include increased wages “well beyond the industry standard” as well as increased benefits and cash bonuses.

“Unfortunately, we have yet to reach an agreement. However, we are optimistic that we can, and we will continue to work toward an agreement by the Union’s December 6 strike deadline,” the company’s statement read.

“We remain focused on employee safety, ensuring farmers and ranchers have access to markets and providing meals for families across Canada.”

Payne has said he believes a strike is the most likely outcome of the labour dispute.

Cargill’s High River plant faced scrutiny last spring, when it was home to Canada’s largest outbreak of COVID-19 , leading to worker concerns over pandemic health and safety.

Just under 950 workers tested positive for the virus during the outbreak, representing nearly half the plant’s workforce; three deaths were linked to the outbreak, including workers Benito Quesada, 51, and Hiep Bui, 67.

The outbreak led to a temporary shutdown at the plant, with operations put on pause for two weeks in an attempt to get virus spread under control.

—With files from Marcy Nicholson, Bloomberg News


'Couldn’t come at a worse time': Analysts worry about potential impacts from Cargill strike


Teri Fikowski
CTV News Calgary Video Journalistt
Updated Nov. 12, 2021 9:12 p.m. MST

CALGARY -

You may have noticed record high prices at the meat counter recently and according to analysts, you could see fewer options and a major impact to beef producers if workers at the Cargill plant in High River, Alta. go on strike next month.

The United Food and Commercial Workers Local 401, which represents some 2,000 workers at the meat processing plant, delivered a strike notice to Cargill representatives Wednesday after 97 per cent of workers voted in favour. They’ve been without a contract since the end of 2020 and are demanding fair compensation and a safe workplace.

The cost of beef has skyrocketed to record highs since late 2020, due largely to a rise in grain prices, supply chain issues and labour disruptions, but analysts don’t expect a strike at the plant to translate into even higher prices for consumers.

“Grocers may decided not to carry as many products at the meat counter when it comes to beef. They’ll probably fill the space with more poultry, more hogs really so more pork,” said Sylvain Charlebois, senior director of the Agri-Food Analytics Lab at Dalhousie University in Halifax.

“Consumers have options, you have the meat trifecta with chicken and pork and they can go pick another type of meat.”

That will only happen if the plant shuts down due to a labour disruption, which Charlebois believes is very unlikely.

“I don’t think Cargill can afford a labour dispute, they’ll have to settle and if they do settle than wages will go up significantly," he said.

In a statement on Thursday, UFCW Local 401 president Thomas Hesse said if a deal isn't struck by Dec. 6, workers will go on strike.

"A picket line will be highly visible, and a strike appears to be a viable weapon in achieving a fair offer in negotiations," the union said.

“They want compensation for everything they’ve went through,” said Hesse. “How do you really put a number on the kind of suffering that these workers have felt? Hundreds of them got the disease, some slept in the garage because they were terrified to give it to their family.”

MAJOR BEEF PRODUCER

Cargill handles around 35 per cent of beef processed in Canada, with some 4,500 head of cattle slaughtered a day.

The facility had to shut down during the pandemic due to a massive COVID-19 outbreak, with around half of all workers contracting the virus and the deaths of two employees.

“Closing the plant for a while is going to be a problem for the entire sector. With the 26 last year I believe it took four months for the entire industry to get back to some kind of normal,” said Charlebois.

Cattle producers would likely take the biggest blow from a shutdown after already enduring one last year along with other challenges from the pandemic and a tough drought season.

“The biggest losers would be farmers by far, they would be stuck with access inventory and would have to continue to feed cattle," said Charlebois.

"The grain market is quite expensive these days so they would have to keep on feeding cattle with highly expensive prices for feed. So if there’s a labour dispute farmers are highly vulnerable right now.”

COULDN'T COME AT A WORSE TIME


The Alberta Cattle Feeders says a strike couldn’t come at a worst time.

Grain prices have almost doubled from a year ago and says if Cargill shutdown next month it will only compound the problems facing farmers.

“Plants are behind already with labour shortages and processing cattle,” says “Unfortunately it’s going to be so hard on our industry, I’m just not sure how we’re going to recover and some people are going to be absolutely devastated by it financially.”

On Wednesday, a spokesperson for Cargill said they negotiations were still taking place and remained optimistic an agreement will be reached.

"At Cargill, we greatly value our employees and the work they do to feed Canadians. Over the last two days, our company and the union representing employees at our High River protein facility have exchanged multiple comprehensive proposals that included increased wages well beyond the industry standard, enhanced employee benefits and cash bonus’ for active employees," read a statement.

"We believe that our proposal is very fair and representative of our values to put people first and do the right thing.

"Unfortunately, we have yet to reach an agreement. However, we are optimistic that we can, and we will continue to work towards an agreement by the Union’s Dec. 6 strike deadline. We remain focused on employee safety, ensuring farmers and ranchers have access to markets and providing meals for families across Canada."


RELATED STORIES
'We are not afraid': Workers at Cargill's High River, Alta. meat plant vote to strike
Meat packers call for changes to foreign worker cap to address labour shortage crisis
Workers at southern Alberta meat-processing plant begin receiving COVID-19 vaccinations
Another COVID-19 outbreak at Cargill plant in High River
Cargill donates $125K to social agencies in High River, Alta.
REM train cars in first shipment are flawed, pose injury risk: report

Head of CDPQ-Infra has complained to the consortium making the cars that an inspection revealed various manufacturing defects.

Author of the article: Montreal Gazette
Publishing date:Nov 12, 2021 
The REM's first train cars were unveiled in Brossard on Monday November 16, 2020. The front car has a lowered window so that kids can get a great view outside.
 PHOTO BY DAVE SIDAWAY /Montreal Gazette

A preliminary inspection of train cars made in India and destined to be used in Montreal’s Réseau Express Métropolitain (REM) network revealed manufacturing flaws that could represent a “potential risk of injury” to passengers, Radio-Canada reported on Friday.

Citing a letter from the head of the Caisse de dépôt affiliate overseeing the REM project and addressed to the train manufacturing consortium formed by Alstom and SNC-Lavalin, the report details what the letter said were a series of manufacturing defects discovered during an inspection of the first batch of rolling stock delivered to Quebec.


Train car assembly, wiring, and finishing all exhibited “a breach of principles” and of best practices for the construction of trains, Jean-Marc Arbaud, head of CDPQ Infra said in the letter to consortium director Eric Appert, adding the quality of the product delivered was “not of the level expected.”

Photos accompanying the letter depict exposed and damaged wiring, an access door that is poorly fitted and dented as well as welding issues with bars used by passengers for support.


In his letter, Arbaud also questions the “general quality” of how the trains are constructed at the Sri City plant in India, adding with 30 per cent of the trains already having been completed, there is “a significant risk” of more repairs being necessary.Arbaud said he is “concerned” by the inspection’s findings, which he said show neither the contract for the trains nor best practices had been respected.

A spokesperson for CDPQ-Infra told Radio-Canada “there is trend developing in certain parts of the production chain we would like to see corrected,” adding, however, authorities were “very confident” those corrections would be carried out and the REM project as a whole had not been compromised.

British Columbia

Fairy Creek protesters vow to stay in the woods, despite bad weather and court injunction

Police continue enforcement of a temporary injunction

allowing logging work to take place

Protesters against old-growth logging stay warm and dry under a tent near the Fairy Creek watershed on Nov. 10, 2021. (Ken Mizokoshi/CBC)

About two dozen vehicles line the paved road that connects Port Renfrew to Lake Cowichan, on southwestern Vancouver Island.

Many are old camper vans, sporting bumper stickers about saving the old growth forest. Soggy rain gear hangs from tailgates and side view mirrors. 

They're parked where a logging road meets the main road, and it's that logging road protesters have been blockading regularly since the spring. There's a big orange gate blocking the road, and it opens only for police and logging vehicles.

On Wednesday, a surprisingly dry day, the gate is opened for a police van containing people who have just been arrested for allegedly breaking an injunction. The arrestees bang on the inside of the van walls as it passes, and people seated in tents along the road cheer. 

The camps protesting old-growth logging are supported in part by donations of both money and goods. As the temperatures drop and the rains and wind increase, firewood deliveries come in handy. (Ken Mizokoshi/CBC)

Right now, there is a temporary injunction in place, banning protesters from blocking logging industry work. The original injunction was granted in April to Teal Jones, the logging company that owns the rights to harvest in the area.

In September, a B.C. Supreme Court justice refused to extend the injunction, ruling in part that the actions of police meant that an extension would harm the court's reputation. 

Justice Douglas Thompson wrote that while police have, for the most part, acted responsibly, there are instances where they used unreasonable force and displayed other behaviour that reflected poorly on the court.

Teal Jones immediately filed for appeal and were granted a temporary injunction until the appeal is heard on November 15 and 16.

In the meantime, police continue to enforce the injunction, arresting eight people between Nov. 5 and 12. There have been 1,168 arrests since enforcement began in May. 

Fewer protesters at the camps

Protesters at the camp say confusion about the injunction is one of the reasons their numbers have shrunk over the fall, along with news of coming old-growth logging deferrals.

Shyanne Gunville from Pemberton said the time of year is a factor too. University students who spent the summer at the camps are now back in class, and the wind, rain and hail have driven others away. 

But Gunville says she's not going anywhere. 

"Definitely, we pray for these [days]. We have a dry day today, I've got my rain gear drying as much as I can," she said.

Shyanne Gunville, who calls herself a land defender, has been living in her car at the Fairy Creek protest site. (Kathryn Marlow/CBC)

She says there's a community of support at the camp and everyone is prepared to tough out the winter.

As she explains this to a reporter, people with backpacks and sleeping mats head up the logging road on foot to take turns in the camps they say they have sprinkled in the woods.

While police are still enforcing the injunction, Gunville and others say the tension has dropped.

Charlotte Jones, a Haida woman who comes out to the protests camp on a regular basis from her home in Victoria, describes the scene as "chill." 

"Before, they'd usually ask us for ID, check our bags," Jones said of police. "But now, they're not doing anything." 

Sgt. Chris Manseau speaks for B.C. RCMP and says enforcement levels haven't changed, but there are fewer arrests because there are fewer protesters. The injunction doesn't ban people from using the road, just from stopping logging activity. 

There may be less tension between police and protesters, but Gunville says it remains between protesters and the logging company's workers. 

"I just experienced that on my way down —15 people yelling at me, yelling profanities, and our friends were [subjected to] death threats yesterday a couple of times as well," she said.

Conrad Browne, the director of indigenous partnerships and strategic relations for Teal Jones, said he had not heard of that particular incident, but he's not surprised there's tension. 

Protesters and police are shown at the base of a logging road just outside of Port Renfrew, on Vancouver Island. Protests continue against old-growth logging in the Fairy Creek watershed. (Ken Mizokoshi/CBC)


Browne says the company regularly asks its employees and contractors to be respectful, but after more than a year of protests and disrupted work, some loggers are frustrated.

He said there's a "laundry list" of instances where protesters have provoked loggers, including times they've hidden in cut blocks and jumped out to startle tree fallers. He argues that's a safety issue, in addition to the financial harm protest actions have on the company. 

Next week, Teal Jones will try to convince a judge to extend the injunction. Protesters say they're not going anywhere either way.