Friday, October 28, 2022

CORPORATE PROFITS ARE INFLATION

Higher interest rates will further squeeze food affordability for consumers: Expert

Canadian consumers are being squeezed at both ends as higher interest rates impact shelter costs and food affordability, according to Sylvain Charlebois, director of the Agri-Food Analytics Lab at Dalhousie University.

On Wednesday, the Bank of Canada raised interest rates for the sixth-straight time. The central bank hiked its benchmark overnight lending rate by 50 basis points to 3.75 per cent, which was less than the 75-basis-point hike expected by the majority of economists.

Charlebois said this hike will impact food affordability and how much money Canadians can spend on groceries.

“With hikes, food affordability is being compromised on the backhand, as many households will have less money to devote to food, compared to just a few months ago,” Charlebois said over email on Wednesday.

“Higher interest rates will impact shelter costs for many Canadians, another necessity of life. So consumers are now squeezed from both ends of the food affordability continuum.”

Charlebois said this interest rate hike was “very much about our currency” and is “good news for food traders.”

“As we get closer to winter months, we need a stronger dollar for our food importers to keep prices lower for certain sections of the grocery store, mainly produce,” he said.

 

DOWNWARD PRESSURE ON PRICES

In a press conference on Wednesday, Carolyn Rogers, senior deputy governor at the Bank of Canada, said food retailers have been able to pass on higher input costs to consumers.

But with additional agriculture expenses starting to fall, she said they’ll be watching to see if the price declines are reflected at the grocery store.

“The most important point we can make is that the environment that we're in, an environment of excess demand and high inflation, is the type of environment where retailers including food retailers are most able to pass through pricing increases to consumers,” Rogers said. (can you double check this quote?)

“So our goal of getting them, the excess demand out of the economy, bringing inflation down, will help to restore the competitive pressure and will prevent retailers from just passing through all the costs and will bring the competition back. That'll put downward pressure on prices.”

 

CANADIAN DOLLAR IMPACT ON FOOD PRICES

As we approach the new year, Charlebois said his biggest worry is how the Canadian dollar could impact food prices.

He added that issues with supply chains and higher commodity prices are starting to ease, and that the dollar could become a main “driver for higher food prices in months to come.”

“The CPI (consumer price index) for September did indicate that our dollar was already a factor in food retail,” he said.


Last week, Statistics Canada reported CPI was up 6.9 per cent in September from a year ago, which was higher than economists predicted.

The government organization said food inflation hit its fastest year-over-year pace since 1981, with prices climbing 11.4 per cent compared to a year ago.

The Bank of Canada’s last interest rate announcement for 2022 is scheduled for Dec. 7.

 

WATCHING FOR U.S. FED DECISION

The U.S. Federal Reserve is set to make its next interest rate decision on Nov. 2.

On Sept. 21, the U.S. central bank raised rates by 75 basis points for a third straight time and signalled more aggressive hikes down the road.

Charlebois said that the U.S. Federal Reserve’s decision next week could have a big impact on food prices in the months ahead.

“The U.S. Fed’s decision next week will be key, and will have an impact on our own currency, yet again,” he said.

“If our dollar drops further, we could see grocery prices continue to increase in months to come.”

RBC: Canadians expected to lose wealth at pace not seen since early 1990s

Canadians’ net wealth is about to fall at its fastest pace in decades as rising interest rates, weakening financial and housing markets all weigh on consumers, according to a report by the Royal Bank of Canada.

In a report released Wednesday, it found that Canadians gained a total of $3.9 trillion in net wealth over the pandemic amid higher home values.

Since then, about $900 billion has been lost as a result of higher rates, and a decline in housing and financial markets, the report states.

In an email to BNN Bloomberg, Carrie Freestone, economist at RBC, said the recent drop is the “largest quarterly decline in net wealth on record” and the “total decline in net wealth that we’re expecting to see will be the largest decline in decades dating back to the early 1990s.”

“We expect a 41 per cent ($1.6 trillion) retracement of those net worth gains from peak-to-trough,” Freestone said in the report.

“While that still won’t retrace all of our pandemic gains, it will nevertheless create a negative ‘wealth effect’ that will drag on consumer spending, even as labour markets soften.”

 

SPENDING CURTAILMENT TO WEIGH ON ECONOMY

The significant drop in Canadians’ net wealth could have a significant impact on the economy, the report states.

“The dramatic decline in net wealth, combined with rising prices and higher interest rates, will cut roughly $15 billion from household spending in 2023,” Freestone said.

“This is one of the factors that will drive Canada into a recession early next year.”

Freestone said while discretionary spending on areas like home improvement and renovations drove a surge in spending during the pandemic, as rates continue to rise, Canadians will now have to prioritize necessities like food, gas and debt.

“We estimate households will soon have to allocate 15 per cent of their take-home pay just to debt servicing, with half of this attributed to mortgage costs,” she said.

She added that a decline in discretionary items like furniture has already started.

“As this decline deepens, it will weigh on businesses, particularly in the manufacturing sector,” Freestone said.


Rate surprise risks engulfing Bank of Canada in political storm

The Bank of Canada’s interest-rate surprise potentially opens up Governor Tiff Macklem to the accusation that he and his governing council are reacting to political sniping against them, economists said. 

The central bank raised its overnight rate by 50 basis points on Wednesday to 3.75 per cent. Traders and a majority of economists polled by Bloomberg were anticipating a larger increase of 75 basis points. 

Those expectations were based, in part, on Macklem’s Oct. 14 remarks that the bigger policy risk was under-tightening. Five days later, Statistics Canada reported headline inflation of 6.9 per cent for September, which appeared to the seal the case for a larger hike. 

But monetary policy has become a target for some on the political left. 

Last weekend, Jagmeet Singh, the leader of the New Democratic Party, said there is “no merit” to the Bank of Canada’s approach to steep rate hikes and argued it unfairly punishes lower-income Canadians. He released a letter addressed to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau that said the central bank was “already laying the groundwork for a recession.” Singh’s party has an alliance with Trudeau’s Liberal government to ensure it can pass key legislation.

“This was a masterclass in how not to communicate,” Andrew Kelvin, chief Canada strategist at Toronto-Dominion Bank, told Bloomberg of the Bank of Canada’s approach. “Surprising dovishly after political figures started suggesting the bank slow the pace of rate hikes will raise questions about commitment and credibility.”

Benjamin Reitzes, an economist at Bank of Montreal, agreed. “One potentially prickly point for policymakers is that a number of politicians have been weighing in on the policy decision in recent weeks, stating that large rate hikes aren’t appropriate anymore,” Reitzes said in report to investors. “Expect plenty of chatter about potential political influence, whether real or perceived.”

Singh praised the central bank’s decision to go with a smaller hike on Wednesday. “It’s a good sign that they’re not moving as aggressively,” he told reporters outside the legislature. “We’ve also heard from other economists saying that we should just pause, that the increased interest rates now will take some time to actually have an impact.”

A former top Liberal aide weighed in this week as well. 

Tyler Meredith, who was one of Trudeau’s longest-serving economic advisers until last month, publicly urged Macklem to show “flexibility” and consider easing up. “There is ample evidence for the Bank of Canada to begin to slow down and potentially pause. They should heed it,” Meredith wrote Tuesday in The Globe and Mail newspaper. 

Macklem has also come under criticism from the other side of the political spectrum. Conservative Party Leader Pierre Poilievre has targeted Macklem since the early days of the pandemic for allegedly enabling Trudeau’s deficits through purchases of government bonds. Poilievre even promised to fire Macklem, though he has avoided repeating that pledge since his election as leader in September.

All of this led Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland to defend the central bank, telling reporters Tuesday  that “institutional stability very much includes the independence of the Bank of Canada.”

 

‘DIFFICULT DECISIONS’

Asked Wednesday whether his credibility had been damaged, Macklem deflected the question. 

“Look, these are difficult decisions,” he said. “I will say that the independence of the central bank becomes more important when the decisions are difficult.”  

To some economists, the bank’s decision is all about the evidence of a slowing economy, not politics. The central bank cut its growth projection for 2023 in half, to just 0.9 per cent. 


“I think the economic forecast justifies what they did,” said Dominique Lapointe, director of macro strategy at Manulife Investment Management. 


 


Bank of Canada: Read Tiff Macklem's full statement

The Bank of Canada raised its key policy rate half a point Wednesday taking it to 3.75 per cent.

This marks the sixth consecutive interest rate hike by the central bank since March as it attempts to tame high inflation, which surged 6.9 per cent in September compared to a year earlier — well ahead of the Bank of Canada’s goal of keeping inflation at two per cent.


Following the announcement, Bank of Canada Governor Tiff Macklem held a news conference in Ottawa where he discussed the central bank's decision and took questions from reporters.

You can read Macklem's full opening statement below.

"Good morning. I’m pleased to be here with Senior Deputy Governor Carolyn Rogers to discuss today’s policy announcement and the Bank’s Monetary Policy Report (MPR).

Today, we raised the policy interest rate by 50 basis points to 3.75 per cent. This is the sixth consecutive increase since March. Quantitative tightening continues and is complementing increases in the policy rate. We also expect our policy rate will need to rise further. How much further will depend on how monetary policy is working to slow demand, how supply challenges are resolving and how inflation and inflation expectations are responding to this tightening cycle.

Our decision today reflected several considerations.

First, inflation in Canada remains high and broad-based. Inflation has come down in recent months, but we have yet to see a generalized decline in price pressures.

Second, and related, the economy is still in excess demand—it’s overheated. Households and businesses want to buy more goods and services than the economy can produce, and this is driving prices higher.

Third, higher interest rates are beginning to weigh on growth. This is increasingly evident in interest-rate-sensitive parts of the economy, like housing and spending on big-ticket items. But the effects of higher rates will take time to spread through the economy.

Fourth, there are no easy outs to restoring price stability. We need the economy to slow down to rebalance demand and supply and relieve price pressures. We expect growth will stall in the next few quarters—in other words, growth will be close to zero. But once we get through this slowdown, growth will pick up, our economy will grow solidly, and the benefits of low and predictable inflation will be restored.

Finally, we are trying to balance the risks of under- and over-tightening.

If we don’t do enough, Canadians will continue to endure the hardship of high inflation. And they will come to expect persistently high inflation, which will require much higher interest rates and potentially a severe recession to control inflation. Nobody wants that.

If we do too much, we could slow the economy more than needed. And we know that has harmful consequences for people’s ability to service their debts, for their jobs and for their businesses.

This tightening phase will draw to a close. We are getting closer, but we are not there yet.

We are carefully assessing the effects of higher interest rates on economic activity and inflation. And we are being clear with Canadians and focusing on the job we have been assigned—to restore price stability for the benefit of all.

Let me expand on these considerations and highlight the key points in the Governing Council’s deliberations.


The Governing Council began by assessing international developments since the July MPR. Inflation around the world is high and increasingly broad-based. With most central banks raising their policy rates to control inflation, global financial conditions have tightened rapidly. The global economy is slowing, and we revised down our projection for global growth. We also noted the emergence of financial stresses in some markets in recent months.

A number of indicators suggest that global supply disruptions are easing. Oil and other commodity prices have also come down since July. Together with slower global growth, these developments suggest global inflation should come down over time. However, uncertainty is high, particularly related to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and there is potential for more volatility in energy markets and for renewed supply chain disruptions.

Turning to Canadian developments, the Governing Council devoted considerable attention to assessing inflation, inflation expectations and the balance between demand and supply in the economy.

Since June, inflation in Canada has come down from 8.1 per cent to 6.9 per cent. Though welcome, most of that decline reflects a drop in gasoline prices. Inflation in Canada is broad-based, reflecting large increases in both goods and services prices. About two-thirds of the components of the consumer price index (CPI) have risen by more than 5 per cent over the last year. And rising prices for essentials like groceries and rent are hitting lower income Canadians particularly hard.

Because short-term movements in total CPI inflation are often dominated by swings in volatile international prices like oil prices, we are watching measures of core inflation closely for signs that price pressures in Canada are easing. Our preferred core measures have stopped rising in the last couple of months, but they have yet to show clear evidence that underlying inflation is coming down. Looking ahead, there are some early encouraging signs. Businesses have said they expect the rate of price increases for the goods and services they sell will come down. And more timely 3-month rates of core inflation have declined, although they are still averaging about 4 per cent. We will need to see these 3-month rates come down further, and those declines be sustained.

We are also looking for evidence that near-term inflation expectations are easing and that longer-term expectations are centred on our 2 per cent target. Near-term expectations remain high and our surveys suggest that uncertainty about where inflation is headed remains unusually elevated.

Looking at indicators of labour markets and economic activity, it is clear that even though the economy has started to slow, it remains in excess demand. Job vacancies have declined from their peak but remain high, and businesses continue to report widespread labour shortages. With the economy now fully reopened, households want to enjoy many of the close-contact services they have missed, but businesses can’t keep up, and we have seen prices for services rise rapidly.

Higher policy interest rates are beginning to slow demand. Higher mortgage rates have contributed to a sharp slowing in housing activity from unsustainable levels, and consumer and business spending on goods is moderating. This has led to declines in house prices and is exerting downward pressure on goods prices.

Moving forward, we expect the effects of higher interest rates to continue to work through the economy, moderating household spending and business investment. Slowing global growth, particularly in the United States, will also weigh on Canadian exports. We project growth in gross domestic product (GDP) will stall through the end of this year and the first half of 2023 before picking up in the second half. Annual average GDP growth is therefore projected to decline from about 3¼ per cent this year to just under 1 per cent next year and about 2 per cent in 2024. With growth below potential for several quarters, excess demand in the economy dissipates and the economy moves into excess supply in 2023.

Putting the global and Canadian outlooks together, we expect inflation will hover around 7 per cent in the final quarter of this year, fall to around 3 per cent by the end of next year and return to the 2 per cent target by the end of 2024.

The Bank of Canada’s job is to ensure inflation is low, stable and predictable. We are still far from that goal. We view the risks around our forecast for inflation to be reasonably balanced, but with inflation so far above our target, we are particularly concerned about the upside risks. We are mindful that adjusting to higher interest rates is difficult for many Canadians. Many households have significant debt loads, and higher interest rates add to their burden. We don’t want this transition to be more difficult than it has to be. But we remain focused on our mandate. Higher interest rates in the short term will bring inflation down in the long term. And getting through this difficult phase will get us back to price stability with sustained growth.

As we move forward, we will be watching carefully to assess the impact of higher rates on spending and how this is feeding through to price pressures. We will also be watching to see how global supply disruptions resolve and to what extent this translates into lower inflation in Canada. Finally, we’ll be watching inflation expectations closely to assess how households and businesses are responding to slowing growth and spending.

With that summary, Senior Deputy Governor Rogers and I are now pleased to take your questions."

With files from David George-Cosh


Ottawa restricting foreign state-owned investments in critical minerals

The Canadian Press

Innovation, Science and Industry Minister Francois-Philippe Champagne rises during Question Period, Friday, October 28, 2022 in Ottawa. The federal government is restricting the involvement of state-owned companies in Canada's critical minerals sector. , THE CANADIAN PRESS/Adrian Wyld

The federal government is restricting the involvement of foreign state-owned companies in Canada's critical minerals sector amid a global rush for the resources and growing tensions with China.

Industry Minister Francois-Philippe Champagne and Natural Resources Minister Jonathan Wilkinson announced the new approach in a statement Friday, saying critical minerals are key to Canada’s prosperity and security.

“Increasing demand and constrained supply of these all-important minerals are presenting Canada with a generational economic opportunity, and the government of Canada is committed to seizing that opportunity while delivering on its ambitious climate goals,” the ministers said.

"While we continue to welcome foreign direct investment that supports this goal, Canada will act decisively when investments threaten our national security and our critical minerals supply chains.”

The new rules will make it more difficult for companies owned or operated by foreign governments to buy or invest in the industry, with the government planning to set a higher bar for whether such a transaction is considered beneficial to Canada.

Among the factors that will be considered are the extent to which a foreign government might have control over Canadian assets, the amount of competition in the sector, and whether the deal might endanger Canadian security.

The new rules come as companies and countries around the world are moving to secure critical minerals such as aluminum, lithium and cobalt, many of which are vital for electronics and low-carbon technologies including semiconductors, batteries and electric-vehicle motors.

The rules also coincide with growing tensions with China, which has purchased or invested in Canadian mines and other natural resources to feed its own domestic industries.

The federal government is expected to release by the end of the year what it is calling a critical minerals strategy, which will seek to position the country as a leader in supplying the resources to industries and other countries around the world.

IT'S FIREDAY FRIDAY

Musk starts cutting jobs at Twitter as staff seen leaving with boxes

Elon Musk has started to cut employees at Twitter Inc.

People who identified themselves as Twitter employees were seen leaving the company’s San Francisco headquarters carrying boxes of belongings. Internally, Slack channels lit up with suspicion that the departing people were enacting a hoax, and were not in fact laid off, people familiar with the matter said. 

Still, Musk has been cutting -- and started right after the deal closed Thursday with several executives, including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, people familiar with the matter have said. 

The company has scheduled an employee meeting for next Wednesday, but some staff did not receive invitations, according to one of the people familiar with the matter.

Twitter didn’t respond to a request for comment.


ROFLMAO

Elon Musk wants Twitter to 'help humanity'

October 27, 2022

The Tesla CEO has said much of the public speculation about his intentions to buy the social network had been "wrong," and insisted his goals were noble.

In an unusually long, platitude-laden tweet, the world's richest person on Thursday said he wanted to buy Twitter to "help humanity."

Elon Musk, whose $44 billion deal appears to have closed, even admitted that "failure in pursuing this goal, despite our best efforts, is a very real possibility."

Avoiding a 'free-for-all hellscape'

"The reason I acquired Twitter is because it is important to the future of civilization to have a common digital town square, where a wide range of beliefs can be debated in a healthy manner, without resorting to violence,'' Musk, who typically projects his thoughts in one-line tweets, wrote in a long message aimed at advertisers.

"There is currently great danger that social media will splinter into far right wing and far left wing echo chambers that generate more hate and divide our society,'' he added.

He said he doesn't want Twitter to become a "free-for-all hellscape.''

Musk said Twitter should be "warm and welcoming to all'' and enable users to choose the experience they want to have.

On Wednesday Musk visited Twitter's San Francisco headquarters for meetings with executives. He also changed his bio on Twitter to "Chief Twit."

Musk's bid to gain the trust of ad buyers

The tweet from the self-described "free speech absolutist" was aimed at addressing some concerns among advertisers over his likely takeover.

"You do not want a place where consumers just simply are bombarded with things they do not want to hear about, and the platform takes no responsibility,'' Pinar Yildirim, associate professor of marketing at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School to the Associated Press.

Twitter's chief source of revenue is advertising. Ad sales accounted for more than 90% of Twitter's revenue in the second quarter.

Though Musk previously said he wanted to move away from the advertising model, on Thursday he wrote he wants Twitter to be "the most respected advertising platform."

Musk is funding a large portion of the deal through debt. One of Musk's biggest obstacles to closing the deal was keeping in place the financing pledged roughly six months ago.

lo/sms (AP, AFP, Reuters)

Twitter employees respond to new owner Elon Musk’s annihilation of top execs — on Twitter

AlterNet - TODAY
By Alex Henderson

Elon Musk in May 2022© provided by AlterNet

It’s official: billionaire Tesla CEO Elon Musk is now the owner of Twitter. For months, it appeared as though the $44 billion deal wouldn’t go through. But on Thursday, October 27, multiple media outlets reported that Musk had officially acquired Twitter — and it didn’t take him long to begin firing major figures at the company. Musk, according to Newsweek, has fired CEO Parag Agrawal, Chief Financial Officer Ned Segal and Policy Chief Vijaya Gadde.

Agrawal and Segal, according to Reuters, were escorted out of Twitter’s Bay Area headquarters when the deal was finalized. Some Twitter employees have been quick to respond to the firings — on Twitter.

On October 27, Twitter co-founder Biz Stone tweeted, “Thank you to @paraga, @vijaya, and @nedsegal for the collective contribution to Twitter. Massive talents, all, and beautiful humans each!”

Karl Robillard, Twitter’s head of social impact, posted, “There are no words to describe the gratitude and respect I feel for @nedsegal, @vijaya, and @paraga. They are, simply put, the best of the best.”

Twitter’s Haraldur Thorleifsson tweeted, “Reporters asking me what’s happening and I’m just no, you tell me what’s happening.” And Lara Cohen, global head of partners for Twitter, wrote, “I love my colleagues so much.”

Newsweek’s Giulia Carbonaro reports, “The firing of Twitter's top executives follows reports that Musk would fire 75 percent of staff after taking over the company to pay down the company's debt. Both Twitter and Musk later denied the claims, saying that the job cuts won't be as severe.”

With Musk now owning Twitter, many reporters believe that the Tesla CEO is likely to restore former President Donald Trump’s Twitter account — which was shut down following the January 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol Building. Gadde was part of the team that decided to ban Trump from the platform on January 8, 2021.

Parag Agrawal ‘escorted out’ of Twitter headquarters after Musk takeover: Report


Published on Oct 28, 2022 

Elon Musk had accused the top leadership at Twitter of misleading him and investors over the number of fake accounts on the social media platform.

Parag Agrawal walks to a morning session during the Allen & Company Sun Valley Conference in Sun Valley, Idaho.(AFP / File)
Parag Agrawal walks to a morning session during the Allen & Company Sun Valley
 Conference in Sun Valley, Idaho.(AFP / File)

After Elon Musk completed his $44 billion purchase deal of Twitter late on Thursday, its top executives were fired and escorted out of the social media company's San Francisco headquarters, according to several media reports. The Twitter executives who were fired include CEO Parag Agrawal, legal affairs and policy chief Vijaya Gadde, Chief Financial Officer Ned Segal and General Counsel Sean Edgett. (Also Read | Trump's Twitter account to be restored after Elon Musk takeover?)

Musk had accused the top leadership at Twitter of misleading him and investors over the number of fake accounts on the social media platform.

“Agrawal and Segal were in Twitter's San Francisco headquarters when the deal closed and were escorted out,” reported Reuters quoting sources.

“At least one of the executives who was fired was escorted out of Twitter’s office,” a New York Times report said.

Twitter, Musk and the executives are yet to issue an official statement on the firings.

Musk, however, tweeted “The bird is freed” in an obvious reference to the completion of $44 billion deal.

Agrawal had clashed with Musk in recent months about the takeover amid a remarkable saga, full of twists and turns, that sowed doubt over whether the tech billionaire would complete the deal. Musk complained publicly that he believed Twitter's spam accounts were significantly higher than the company's estimate. As per Twitter's regulatory filings, the company said the spam accounts on the platform were less than 5% of its monetizable daily active users.

Musk gave notice to Twitter on July 8 that he was terminating their deal on the grounds that Twitter misled him about the bots and did not cooperate with him. Four days later, Twitter sued Musk to force him to complete the deal.

Twitter co-founder Biz Stone thanked Agrawal, Segal and Gadde for their "massive contribution" to the business.

"Thank you to @paraga, @vijaya , and @nedsegal for the collective contribution to Twitter. Massive talents, all, and beautiful humans each!" Stone tweeted.

(With inputs from Reuters, PTI)


Parag Agrawal likely to receive 

$42 million following exit 

from Twitter: Report


Updated on Oct 28, 2022

Agrawal's run as CEO was quickly disrupted by Musk’s arrival as a major shareholder with Twitter.

Parag Agrawal likely to receive $42 million following exit from Twitter: Report
Parag Agrawal likely to receive $42 million following exit from Twitter: Report
By | Edited by Poulomi Ghosh

Billionaire Elon Musk on Friday after completing his $44 billion deal to take over Twitter fired Twitter CEO Parag Agrawal. However, the top executive will not be leaving empty-handed, said reports. As a part of the deal, Agrawal will vest 100% of his unvested equity awards, reported Bloomberg.

According to research firm Equilar, this means that he will make an estimated $42 million, reported Reuters. The estimate includes a year's worth of Parag's base salary plus accelerated vesting of all equity awards. In 2021, Agrawal's total compensation was $30.4 million, when he was the chief technology officer, according to Twitter's proxy. As the CEO, Agrawal's salary was reported to be $1 million annually.

Also read: You're free to tweet: Messages reveal Elon Musk- Parag Agrawal fall out

Parag Agrawal took over the Twitter CEO role in November last year after co-founder Jack Dorsey unexpectedly resigned. Agrawal's run as CEO was quickly disrupted by Musk’s arrival as a major shareholder and increasingly vocal antagonist of its current leadership. The two had not been on good terms and none of it was hidden from the public eye.

After Musk's involvement, Parag Agrawal was unlikely to keep his job.

In one of Musk's filings about the deal, he said that he “does not have confidence in management”.

Several text messages during the lawsuit showed that Musk and Agrawal had a contentious exchange early on during the deal process after Musk asked his followers whether Twitter was “dying". On April 9, Agarwal had written to Musk: “You are free to tweet ‘is Twitter dying?’ but it’s my responsibility to tell you that it’s not helping me make Twitter better in the current context.” Musk fired back: “What did you get done this week?”

Also read: 'Chief Twit' Elon Musk visits Twitter HQ as takeover deadline looms | Watch

Elon Musk took over Twitter on Friday after a bitter legal battle with the social media platform - days after Musk had pulled the plug on the buyout deal in July - claiming that he was misled by Twitter concerning the number of bot accounts on its platform.

On October 17, Musk and Twitter were expected in a face-off in Delaware's Court of Chancery - wherein the social media company was set to seek an order directing Musk to close the deal for $44 billion. However, earlier this month, Musk proposed to proceed with his original $44 billion bid - calling for an end to the lawsuit by Twitter.

(With inputs from agencies)


MAGA World Rejoices as Elon Musk Fires Lawyer Who Banned Trump From Twitter

BY JAKE THOMAS ON 10/28/22

Elon Musks Shows Up At Twitter HQ With A Sink Ahead Of Takeover Deadline


Donald Trump supporters are reacting with glee to news that Twitter's new owner Elon Musk has fired the lawyer that nixed the former president's account on the social media platform.

After taking control of Twitter on Thursday, Musk swiftly fired company CEO Parag Agrawal and other executives, reports the Associated Press, including Chief Legal Counsel Vijaya Gadde, who made the call in January 2021 to permanently suspend Trump's account for inciting violence. Conservatives, who've complained that Twitter's content moderation is uneven, were receptive to Musk's ownership of the platform. Now, they're cheering Musk's early decisions.

"I was suspended 8 times for absolutely no reason," Libs of TikTok, a Twitter account famous for mocking liberals, tweeted. "I have zero sympathy for Vijaya Gadde- chief of account banning and censorship."




"Thank you, thank you, thank you Elon Musk!" pro-Trump TEAM USA reacted to the firing in a tweet.



Conservative commentator Dinesh D'Souza tweeted that Agarwal and Gadde's firing was "karma" for what he said was their use of the platform to quash their opponents.


The world's wealthiest man who heads electric-car maker Tesla and space exploration company SpaceX, Musk agreed to buy Twitter in April. He promised improvements to the digital town square that included more relaxed content restrictions to facilitate free speech.

"By 'free speech', I simply mean that which matches the law," Musk said in a tweet in April. "I am against censorship that goes far beyond the law."

In the run-up to the finalization of the $44 billion acquisition, Musk criticized Gadde for her previous decisions clamping down on political content. Specifically, Musk took issue with Twitter restricting a New York Post article about alleged influence peddling of President Joe Biden's son, Hunter Biden, during the 2020 election.


Tesla CEO Elon Musk looks up as he addresses guests at the Offshore Northern Seas 2022 meeting in Stavanger, Norway, on August 29, 2022. Musk purchased Twitter on Thursday and fired top executives, delighting conservatives.
CARINA JOHANSEN/GETTY IMAGES

"He's certainly off to a flying start," Lee Harris, who describes himself as a conservative, tweeted in response to Musk's takeover. "Looks like he means business."

Harris reacted to Gadde's firing with the tears of joy emoji and the word "wonderful."


Political commentator Tim Pool, who has accused the platform of unfairly censoring conservatives, tweeted that he "Cracked a bottle of Louis XIII to celebrate Elon buying twitter."

"maybe vijaya can learn to code, i think Parag already knows how," he added.


READ MORE

"Chief Twit" Elon Musk meeting "cool people" at Twitter as deadline nears

But Gadde had sympathizers.

Twitter user V pointed out that Trump was kicked off other social media platforms as well, suggesting Gadde was unfairly singled out for making the call.



Olivia Troye, who served as an adviser to former Vice President Mike Pence, praised Gadde in a tweet: "I just want to thank her & her team for their commitment to trying to make a difference."


Newsweek has reached out to Twitter and Gadde for comment.