Wednesday, May 27, 2020

Sex workers' hands tied under virus lockdowns

Issued on: 28/05/2020

Madame Caramel's Hoxton Dungeon Suite near London's trendy Shoreditch neighbourhood has stood silent for weeks Elizaveta MALYKHINA AFP


London (AFP)

The bondage chairs and polished metal whipping tools sit gathering dust on a quiet street near London's trendy Shoreditch neighbourhood -- and Madame Caramel is not pleased.

The coronavirus lockdown has punished the London dominatrix, whose Hoxton Dungeon Suite has stood silent for weeks.

"In regards to the dungeon, completely stopped, zero percent, no income whatsoever, and in regards to Madame Caramel as a professional dominatrix it is exactly the same," said the red-haired self-proclaimed "femme domme".


"The one-to-one... is gone, just the online stays," she told AFP.

- 'Can't do in-person' -

In Europe's red-light capital Amsterdam, sex work is due to officially resume in September. Prostitution in the Netherlands is legal and regulated, which allows for more support and structure during the coronavirus lockdown.

But many sex workers in Britain and beyond are now moving online to make ends meet.

Fellow London dominatrix Mistress Evilyne found success on the largely X-rated entertainment platform OnlyFans, which has grown in popularity since it was founded in 2016.

She said a relatively successful OnlyFans account can bring in about £800 ($1,000, 900 euros) a month, and is often supplemented with content on other sites, such as Clips4Sale or iWantClips.

"Obviously I can't do in-person meets anymore," Evilyne said.

She works out of her small flat in southeast London, where chains, whips, gags and other BDSM (bondage, domination, sado-masochism) apparatus lie unused beneath her bed.

But she said many clients are still asking about in-person sessions, despite the risks and government advice for people to socially distance by two metres (six feet) at all times outside the home.

"There are so many people who are emailing every dominatrix I know, including myself, asking for sessions at the moment who are just totally disregarding the fact that we need to stay safe," Evilyne said.

- 'Urgent need' -

Britain counted about 72,000 sex workers -- 32,000 of them in London -- in 2016, according to a government report.

Prostitution is legal in Britain but various related activities such as solicitation are not, so thousands are operating in the shadows and lack access to government support and protections.

Although some may have found a way to make money online, many have been left "doing what they can" during the lockdown, according to Laura Watson, a spokeswoman for the English Collective of Prostitutes.

"If you've got three children at home running around, it's very hard to do online work," she said.

Support groups such as the UK Sex Worker Advocacy and Resistance Movement (SWARM) have set up hardship funds to help "sex workers in urgent need".

"It shouldn't be up to us and up to sex workers themselves to organise their own way out of this," said Watson, who urged the government to do more.

- Charitable support -

Similar initiatives are springing up globally after the pandemic pushed over half of the world's population into some form of confinement.

In Warsaw, a group of men and women in the industry set up a fundraiser to help buy essentials during lockdown.

It began as a donation-based system, but eventually allowed contributors to access content.

They raised £3,000 in two weeks, sex worker "Medroxy", one of the organisers, told AFP.

Meanwhile in Europe's capital Brussels, sex workers are relying on donated parcels of essentials to survive.

Dolores, 60, who has worked in the industry for 42 years, said she now relies on the small paper bag full of essentials such as toiletries that is supplied by a charity grocery store.

It is distributed by a sex workers' collective, the Union of Sex Workers Organised For Independence (UTSOPI), whose volunteers make drop-offs every Wednesday.

"If I didn't have the parcel, I don't know what I would do," said Dolores, who also helps with deliveries.

Belgian law prohibits third-party activities such as renting out rooms for use by prostitutes or managing a brothel, but regional regulations vary widely.

Even though prostitutes are liable for income tax, Maxime Maes, a coordinator for the collective, said most sex workers are not registered to pay taxes.

"All these people do not have access to everything," he said, noting they missed out on unemployment support and other government welfare.

- 'Fear of contact' -

Back in Britain, sex workers registered as self-employed are eligible for government hardship grants.

Both Mistress Evilyne and Madame Caramel have applied to receive funds during the lockdown.

Despite an approaching easing of Britain's lockdown, uncertainty about how willing people will be to go back to their old habits in a world filled with a new, dangerous disease leaves sex workers apprehensive.

"I think there's going to be this real fear of contact that's probably going to affect a lot of people who are going to second-guess whether they should go and see a service provider," Evilyne said.

As for Madame Caramel, she is not taking any risks.

"I just really have to wait until almost everything is opening... because I want to cover myself as well," she said.

"Because if someone gets sick in my dungeon, you know I am not insured for that."

German sex workers call to end coronavirus ban

Sex workers have put forward their own coronavirus "hygiene concept" as they call for a resumption of services. 

Being called "super spreaders" is offensive and misinformed, they say.



The coronavirus ban on sex work, including the closure of brothels must be lifted, said Germany's Federal Association of Sex Services (BSD) in an open letter, citing a fall in coronavirus transmission rates.


The letter was addressed to 16 members of Germany's parliament who recently called for a permanent ban on sex work.

The sex work industry must also be able "to generate income again and to offer customers a good service that is human and grounding for them," states the letter.

The letter presents a "hygiene concept" that outlines how sex work could continue while minimizing infection.

A ban on sex work was introduced in mid-March as part of nationwide measures to slow the spread of the coronavirus. After the transmission rate from the virus fell, German states began to ease restrictions such as reopening restaurants, swimming pools and non-sexual massage parlours. Yet the blanket ban on all types of sex work remains in place.

Last week, 16 German lawmakers signed a letter that stated: "Prostitution has the effect of a virus super spreader – sexual acts are generally non-negotiable with social distancing." The open letter from the BSD is addressed to these lawmakers.

The group responded: "To use the term 'super spreader' in this context is not only extremely offensive but also wrong. Obviously you want to discredit an entire industry in order to enforce your real goal, the ban on the purchase of sex."

The Berlin-based BSD states that there is variety in places where sex work is undertaken and the ratio of customer to client is often one on one – "similar to a cosmetic studio or massage parlour."


What is in the 'hygiene concept'?

The BSD suggests there should be a limit placed on the number of sex workers able to work in brothels. In smaller brothels there could be a limit of up to 10 sex workers at one time. Larger houses could open up some, but not all of their rooms.

Sex work in private houses and in private apartments should be able to go-ahead.

Bars, table dance bars, cinemas and clubs would be able to reopen, but at half their usual capacity, while ensuring a minimum distance of 1.5 meters is maintained between guests.

During meetings with clients, sex workers would have to wear face masks and rooms would have to be aired and disinfected. Measures to ensure contact tracing would also be in place, in case of an outbreak.

"In prostitution, there has always been a high hygiene standard," states the BSD.

Read more: German brothels get new 'ethical sex seal' for prostitution

Legal but not decriminalized

Sex work in Germany is legal but not decriminalized, meaning those in the sex industry must comply with strict laws governing how it is carried out. Since 2017, sex workers must register with local authorities and seek a medical consultation from a public health service. Brothels are also subject to strict hygiene checks.

Watch video Sexuality always matters - also during the pandemic


A history of resistance: key dates in Hong Kong's battle with China

Beijing’s attempts to bring the territory to heel since handover have resulted in pushback and protest
 Umbrellas in a cloud of tear gas outside Tai Koo MTR station in Hong Kong, 2019. Photograph: Anthony Kwan/Getty Images

Beijing’s rubber-stamp parliament is to vote to move forward with a national security law for Hong Kong, in an unprecedented push that many fear will result in silencing critics of the government in the territory.
The legislation, which would bypass the semi-autonomous territory’s legislature as well as widespread opposition to such measures, comes on Thursday after years of controversial government-proposed measures aimed at bringing Hong Kong more in line with Beijing’s wishes.
Mass demonstrations have erupted in response to each of these plans over the decades, bringing them to a halt, as well as solidifying civil society and laying the foundation for future protests. These are the key moments of resistance in Hong Kong’s history:


Article 23 national security law – 2003

After the handover of Hong Kong to Chinese control in 1997, the former British colony was meant to pass laws that would prevent treason, secession, sedition, subversion and other acts against the Chinese central government. The requirement is enshrined in a provision, article 23, of Hong Kong’s de facto constitution, known as the basic law.
In early 2003, the government proposed a national security law, prompting fears that overly broad definitions of national security on the mainland would be established in Hong Kong, threatening freedom of speech, the press and assembly. Barristers said the law went beyond what was required by article 23, while others worried about expanded powers given to the police and draconian measures that would put security above civil liberties.
On 1 July, as the government tried to push the legislation through, an estimated half a million people took to the streets in the largest protests since the handover. They called for the law to be stopped and for the chief executive Tung Chee-hwa to resign. The bill was eventually shelved. The secretary of security who had pushed the legislation resigned, and two years later, Tung stepped down in the middle of his second term, citing health problems.

FacebookPinterest
 Protesters chant slogans calling for political reforms in 2003. Photograph: Kin Cheung/Reuters

Patriotic education – 2012

In 2012, the education bureau of Hong Kong proposed a “moral and civic education” curriculum to be implemented in all public schools by 2016. Guidelines distributed to teachers in a handbook called the China Model criticised multiparty democracies and described the Communist party in glowing terms. Critics argued the curriculum was an attempt to brainwash students.
Jiang Yudui of the pro-Beijing China Civic Education Promotion Association said at the time, according to local media: “A brain needs washing if there is a problem, just as clothes need washing if they’re dirty.”
Organisers said at least 90,000 people came out to oppose the plan. Protesters occupied government headquarters for 10 days, with some going on hunger strike. Demonstrators chanted slogans such as “No thought control”.
The law gave rise to a group of student leaders, including the pro-democracy activist Joshua Wong, who was 15 at the time. Wong notes that even though the plan did not go forward, Hong Kong education has been compromised in other ways, including the revision of textbooks and most recently a question in a history exam that Beijing took issue with.
The patriotic education plan was also shelved. In 2018, education officials said there were no plans to reintroduce the plan but that the government was looking into ways of implementing it “in a way Hong Kong people can accept”.

Universal suffrage – 2014



Hong Kong’s basic law says that election of the territory’s chief executive, who is chosen by an election committee by universal suffrage, is the “ultimate aim”. In 2007, Beijing pledged that Hong Kong’s 7 million people would be able to cast a ballot for their chief executive election in the 2017 election.
But in 2014 the standing committee of China’s legislature, the National People’s Congress, which has ultimate authority over interpretation of the basic law, said any candidate would first need majority support from an election committee comprised of pro-Beijing delegates. Only vetted candidates who “love the country” could run.
Calls for “real universal suffrage” spawned what became known as the Umbrella movement, an occupation in central Hong Kong as well as other areas of the city that lasted for 79 days in 2014.

FacebookPinterest
 Detained and injured protesters wait to be evacuated by ambulance near Polytechnic University of Hong Kong in 2019. Photograph: Bing Guan/EPA

Extradition bill – 2019

Last year, the Hong Kong government proposed amendments to its extradition law that would allow those wanted by Chinese authorities to be sent to mainland China.
Proponents of the bill, prompted by a murder that took place in Taiwan, said the changes were key to ensuring the city does not become a haven for criminals. Critics said it was a backhanded way of giving the government a way to extradite critics and political opponents to China.
The proposal, which has now been shelved, gave rise to the longest and most volatile protest movement the territory has seen. The demonstrations, which have included both peaceful rallies and marches as well as violent clashes with the police and fights between residents as well as vandalism, are now approaching their one year anniversary.
BLACK LIVES MATTER PROTESTS AGAINST MINNEAPOLIS POLICE
WHO MURDERED A BLACK MAN  GEORGE FLOYD BY KNEELING ON HIS NECK
PHOTO ESSAY BY THE GUARDIAN
EXCERPTS

Protests in Minneapolis over death of George Floyd after arrest – in pictures

Hundreds of protesters gathered on Tuesday evening to demand justice for George Floyd, an African American man who died after a white police officer knelt on his neck as he lay on the ground during an arrest. Footage of the incident showed Floyd shouting ‘I cannot breathe’ and ‘Don’t kill me’

FBI investigates George Floyd death


Wed 27 May 2020

 Protesters in Minneapolis Photograph: Kerem Yucel/AFP/Getty Images
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/gallery/2020/may/27/protests-in-minneapolis-over-death-of-george-floyd-after-arrest-in-pictures


A protester holds a sign
Protesters gather outside the police precinct
Protesters at the scene where Floyd was pinned down by a police officer
People hold up their fists after protesting near the spot where Floyd died
People stand with raised fists as protesters march by
Protesters and police face each other

Police have clashed with protesters on the streets of Minneapolis amid outrage over the death of an unarmed black man in police custody. George Floyd died after an officer knelt on his neck for several minutes. Large crowds gathered in the city on Tuesday night and police in riot gear fired teargas and rubber bullets at demonstrators












George Floyd could not breathe. We must fight police violence until our last breath

The Minnesota police department that killed George Floyd has been violent and racist since its inception. Can we really have faith in reform?


Derecka Purnell Wed 27 May 2020
Photograph: Craig Lassig/EPA

‘Why have we dismissed police abolition as a viable option for a transformative society?’ 


White police officer Derek Chauvin pinned George Floyd to the concrete as he hollered that he could not breathe. George screamed. Screamed for his mother. Screamed for his breath. For his life.

For many watching the footage, George’s cries echoed Eric Garner’s “I can’t breathe.” New York police department officer Daniel Pantaleo killed Garner a couple of weeks before a Ferguson police officer killed Michael Brown. George’s plea reminds me of another black man shot by police: Eric Harris. In 2015, Tulsa reserve deputy Robert Bates told Harris “fuck your breath”. That same year, Fairfax county law enforcement tased Natasha McKenna four times while she sought help during a mental health crisis. As they were brutalizing her, she said, “You promised you wouldn’t kill me.” For me, the image of the white officer kneeling into George’s back reminds me most of Freddie Gray. Baltimore police severed Gray’s spine through an intentional rough ride in the back of a police van.

George, like Dreasjon Reed, Breonna Taylor and other black people killed by police this year, should be alive and breathing. This cycle – murder, protest, calls for justice, non-indictments – is revelatory. We must join others to reduce police power before, during and after these viral killings. Police reform is not enough. We need abolition.

In recent years, news stories broke about how Immigrations and Customs Enforcement use raids, detentions and deportations to threaten immigrants in the US. Calls to “Abolish Ice” could be heard from the streets to the halls of Congress. Ironically, there were no calls to have more Latino and black Ice agents. Mayors did not call for community-driven deportation or raids, like we see for community policing. Non-profits did not call to strengthen relationships between border patrol and immigrants; cities did not fund Ice and ice-cream trucks to pass out treats to immigrant children. Liberals did not point out that there were good apples and bad apples in border patrol enforcement. These programs cannot reform Ice, nor can they reform police.

If we can understand that the calls to abolish Ice actually means that this country needs a new, transformational immigration system, then why dismiss police abolition as a viable option for a transformative society?

One major difference is the mainstream narrative around dreamers: immigrants hoping for a better life and fleeing persecution and violence in their homeland. To be clear, the fight for immigrant justice is crucial and inseparable from the fight against racial police violence. Immigrants, especially undocumented black immigrants, are vulnerable to police violence and face the risk of prison, deportation and death. Yet black Americans, like indigenous and First Nations people, represent particular reminders that white settlers looted land, committed genocide and enslaved people to build a democracy. As a result, black and indigenous bodies remain a public nuisance to be disappeared, exploited, imprisoned and killed by white people and police alike. They want us to live in constant fear of those possibilities for a reason. Thus, black resistance matters, against police and white supremacy alike.

Abolitionist organizers in Minnesota are informed by a history of resistance that dates back to 1867 when the Minneapolis police department was first formed to surveil black people and Native Americans. Since then, MPD has murdered or beaten black people “savagely” for acts ranging from inviting white women to a dance to refusing to “move on”. Per a report by MPD150, the Minneapolis police department has garnered several accolades over time, including the nation’s most homophobic police department at one point. In recent memory, officers in the city arrested black people at rates 10 times higher than white people for the same offenses.

After a Minneapolis police department officer shot and killed Jamar Clark in 2015, activists occupied their local police department for more than two weeks. This activism spurred organizing that continued after the cameras went away. Through struggle, organizations like MPD150 and Reclaim the Block pushed the mayor and city council to shift more than $1m from police departments to communities. Unquestionably, this organizing since 2015 influenced the mayor’s unprecedented decision to ensure that the police chief fired all four officers responsible for George Floyd’s killing, almost immediately after it happened.

The story is not over. On Tuesday night, MPD teargassed and shot rubber bullets at protesters who took to the streets to decry the murder. The fact that residents were willing to risk their lives during a global pandemic to protest against this injustice demonstrates that the race is not given to the swift nor the strong, but to the organizers who resist until the end.

Derecka Purnell is a movement lawyer, activist and Guardian US columnist.



George Floyd killing: sister says police officers should be charged with murder

Floyd was killed by police in incident captured on video, where an officer knelt on his neck for nine minutes as he lay on the ground



Joanna Walters in New York
@Joannawalters13

Wed 27 May 2020 16.05 BSTFirst published on Wed 27 May 2020 13.30 BS


The sister of George Floyd, the black man killed by police in Minneapolis after an incident captured on video in which an officer knelt on his neck as he lay on the ground, has called for those involved in his death to be charged with murder.

Bridget Floyd said on Wednesday morning that the officers, who were fired on Tuesday, “should be in jail for murder”.

George Floyd, 46, died on Monday. The FBI and authorities in Minnesota have launched investigations into his death. The officer who knelt on Floyd’s neck is white.

Bridget Floyd struggled to hold back tears as she spoke to NBC’s Today show about the family’s shock and grief.

She said: “Me and my family are taking this very, very hard. It’s very heartbreaking, it’s very disturbing.”

Huge protests took place in Minneapolis on Tuesday night. Police in riot gear fired teargas and rubber bullets into the crowd.

In the footage that emerged of Floyd’s violent detention, he can be heard to shout “I cannot breathe” and “Don’t kill me!” He then becomes motionless, eyes closed, face-first on the road.

On Tuesday evening, the mother of Eric Garner condemned Floyd’s killing. Garner was killed in New York City in July 2014 by a police officer who placed him in an illegal chokehold.

Gwen Carr said: “I was horrified to learn about the death of George Floyd, and to hear him utter the same dying declaration as my son Eric. I offer my deepest condolences to the Floyd family, and I stand with them in their fight to get justice for George.”

She said: “It’s painful but true that black lives continue to be destroyed by police officers in many communities across our country. They keep killing us. and it’s the same story again and again.”

Garner’s death became a focal point for national conversations on race and policing and Garner’s last words, “I can’t breathe”, were chanted by protesters across the US.

Play Video
1:34 Minneapolis police fire teargas at protesters after death of George Floyd – video

On Wednesday, a fresh video clip emerged showing officers initially wrestling Floyd out of his car. The footage, broadcast by local station KMSP, shows the police trying to handcuff and arrest Floyd.
Alex Lehnert(@AlexLehnertFox9)

New video sent to us shows the moment George Floyd was removed from his vehicle and handcuffed on 38th and Chicago.
Video courtesy of Christopher Belfrey pic.twitter.com/MiIIula4sAMay 26, 2020

Civil rights lawyer Ben Crump, who spoke alongside Bridget Floyd on Wednesday, said additional video footage “which hasn’t been seen yet” by the public or the authorities had been sent to him by other bystanders and from business surveillance cameras.

Crump said that in some ways, the use of “violent, lethal and excessive force” on Floyd was more disturbing than the treatment of Garner, even, because the officer is seen kneeling on Floyd’s neck for up to nine minutes.

“Nine minutes, while he was begging to breathe and begging for his life,” Crump told Today.

He said he hoped the killing would be a tipping point for the fairness of the US justice system.

“There cannot be two justice systems, one for black America and one for white America.”

Bridget Floyd said the firing of four officers, whose names have not been released, needed to be followed with stronger action.


She said: “I would like for these officers to be charged with murder, because that’s exactly what they did. They murdered my brother. He was crying for help.”

Leading athletes, including LeBron James, Lewis Hamilton and Colin Kaepernick, have expressed their anger and grief over the death of George Floyd.

James, who has spoken out against police brutality in the past, compared the police officer’s stance during the killing of Floyd with Colin Kaepernick’s peaceful protest in 2016, during which he knelt during the national anthem, sparking a wave of similar action in solidarity across different sports to highlight racial injustice and related incidences of police brutality in the US.

The US should stop blocking vital IMF funds for poorer countries

New SDR allocations issued by the IMF could help developing economies cope with the looming economic crisis.
by Rick Rowden MAY 27,2020
IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva speaks during a conference hosted by the Vatican on economic solidarity on February 5, 2020 [File: Reuters/Remo Casilli]

Helpful steps were taken to provide assistance to developing countries grappling with the economic fallout from the COVID-19 crisis at the "virtual" spring meetings of the World Bank Group and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) from April 14 to 17, and at the Group of 20 (G20) summit that took place a few weeks earlier.

These steps included temporary debt-relief and new emergency lending facilities for developing and emerging market economies. Yet one important step that was not taken was a decision for the IMF to issue a new allocation of its international reserve currency, Special Drawing Rights (SDRs), as a fast way of providing low-cost emergency assistance to developing countries to help them address the economic fallout from the COVID-19 crisis.

A new allocation of SDRs would have the effect of automatically increasing the foreign currency reserves of developing countries, enabling them to borrow at lower interest rates, engage in more affordable emergency fiscal stimulus spending and buy needed imports. The last time the IMF issued a new allocation of SDRs was in 2009 during the global financial crisis. Then, the fund allocated $250bn in new SDRs to assist developing countries to weather the storm.

A host of European and African leaders, eminent economists and even IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva herself had been calling for a sizable new SDR allocation in the weeks leading up to the IMF and World Bank meetings.

However, despite such calls, the United States appeared to reject the proposal.

In an official statement issued on April 16, US Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin argued that using existing IMF lending facilities would be more efficient in providing assistance to developing countries than issuing a new SDR allocation.

These existing facilities, however, are unlikely to be able to meet the financial needs of developing countries during this pandemic. The total IMF resources currently amount to $1.3 trillion and only half is available for lending. According to Managing Director Georgieva's "very conservative" estimate, at least $2.5 trillion is needed to assist the world's 165 low-income and emerging economies.

In his statement on the issue, Mnuchin also argued that nearly 70 percent of the funds created with new SDRs would go to the G20 countries, most of which "do not need and would not use additional SDRs to respond to the crisis".

While correct in the absolute sense, a major new issuance of SDRs would still be extremely helpful to developing countries because of the proportionately much smaller sizes of their economies. For example, the $250bn SDR allocation in 2009 proved incredibly helpful for low-income countries in sub-Saharan Africa, and projections indicate a new allocation of $500bn in SDRs would amount to the equivalent of 7-8 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) for low-income countries such as Liberia or South Sudan.

Thus, both of the Treasury secretary’s arguments for rejecting a new issuance of SDRs are not compelling.

A report by Reuters published a day before Mnuchin's statement suggested that the US is opposed to new SDR allocations because such a move would benefit all 189 members of the IMF, including countries the US views as adversaries, such as Iran, Venezuela, and even China. The US Treasury declined to comment on the report.

However, there is still support in the US for a new allocation of SDRs.

For example, on April 21, Representatives Jan Schakowsky, Jesus "Chuy" García, Mark Takano, and 13 other co-sponsors introduced the Robust International Response to Pandemic Act (HR6581), which instructs the US representative to the IMF to support the issuing of $3 trillion in SDRs as part of forthcoming coronavirus legislation to ensure that developing countries will be adequately supported by the IMF and other international financial institutions during this unprecedented global crisis.

There are at least three important reasons why the US should reconsider its position.

First, what happens in the developing world is increasingly important for the entire global economy, even the richest countries. Whereas developing economies accounted for only about 18 percent of global GDP in the 1980s, today they comprise nearly 41 percent (60 percent if adjusted for purchasing power).

Second, despite the temporary debt relief proposed, it will still be difficult for companies and governments in developing countries to raise new funds in current market conditions, and will be nearly impossible for them to roll over their foreign currency-denominated debt in international capital markets. With already nearly $100bn in investment capital having been pulled out of emerging markets this year (four times as much as during the 2008 global financial crisis), such conditions could easily lead to large-scale sovereign debt defaults that could spark contagion in global financial markets. In other words, if developing countries go down, it could wreak havoc across the entire global economy.

Third, and most worrisome, tens of millions are facing sudden economic and food insecurity without any unemployment insurance. In such countries, the unvarnished calculation is that more people could potentially die of food insecurity and related chaos resulting from the economic slowdown than from the novel coronavirus itself. The United Nations' World Food Programme warned on April 21 that the number of people facing acute food insecurity could double in 2020, to 265 million, and that, "The pandemic and lockdown measures combined with rising unemployment and limited access to food could lead to violence and conflict."

Security experts have warned that such violence could lead to new waves of mass migration towards wealthier countries and other calamities. The Africa Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has warned the pandemic could be a "national-security crisis first, an economic crisis second, and a health crisis third".

For all of these reasons, the US should support a new allocation of SDRs at the IMF as the best way to help developing countries survive the economic fallout of the COVID-19 crisis. In this unprecedented and historic moment, the US should do everything possible to enable developing countries to engage in fiscal stimulus programmes to sustain their national economies - and thereby keep afloat the global economy upon which we all depend.

The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial stance.


ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Rick Rowden is Adjunct Professorial Lecturer in the School of International Studies, American University, Washington DC.
THIRD WORLD USA
Why has Navajo Nation been so hit hard by the coronavirus?

Navajo Nation has the highest per capita infection rate in US, highlighting centuries of neglect, native leaders say.


by Creede Newton

Navajo Nation leaders announced last week that it had the highest per capita COVID-19 infection rate in the United States, outpacing hot spots like New York. The grim statistic highlights the historical failings of the US government, Navajo leaders say.

There were 4,794 cases out of the Navajo Nation's 173,000 residents as of Monday, according to Navajo Nation authorities, and that number could rise as testing increases. At least 157 people have died.

Navajo Nation President Jonathan Nez said in a Monday press release that "14.6 percent of our citizens have been tested so far. The Navajo Nation continues to test at a higher rate per capita than any state in the country."

The Navajo Nation government has issued emergency measures: Masks are required in public, and total lockdown curfews are implemented over the weekends to inhibit movement in an effort to stem the virus' spread.

Compounding the problem are the high rates of heart disease, diabetes and obesity on the reservation.

About 30 percent of homes on the Navajo Nation are also without running water. This presents challenges to meet Centers for Disease Control guidelines, including the thorough washing of hands.

"You got the feds, you got everybody saying, 'Wash your hands with soap and water,' but our people are still hauling water. Here's a great opportunity for us to get running water to the Navajo people," Nez said at a digital town hall meeting on May 12.

Raynelle Hoskie attaches a hose to a water pump to fill tanks in her truck outside a tribal office on the Navajo reservation in Tuba City, Arizona [File: Carolyn Kaster/AP Photo]

For Mark Charles, a member of the Navajo Nation who is running as an independent for US president in 2020, it is important to understand why the Navajo Nation faces these issues.

"It's a problem 250 years in the making, going back to how this nation was founded. The ethnic cleansing and genocidal policies … that's where the problem lies," Chares told Al Jazeera.

The reason "healthcare is poor, treaties are not being upheld", according to Charles, who is running a campaign on creating a nation "for all people".
Generational discrimination

The Navajo Nation is a 71,000 square kilometre (27,413 square mile) semi-autonomous territory spanning three US states - Arizona, New Mexico, and Utah. It essentially serves as a reservation for the over 350,000 Navajo people who live there.

The Dine, as the Navajo call themselves, faced a long history of displacement and dispossession as the US expanded west in the 19th century, with conflicts and forced relocations common.

Only Native American running for US presidency (2:16)

It culminated in the 1864 "Long Walk", when the Navajo were forcibly removed from their traditional homelands in present-day Arizona and Western New Mexico and forced to walk over 500 kilometres (310 miles) to Fort Sumner in eastern New Mexico, where they were kept in internment camps.

The Long Walk and the wars that preceded it decimated the Navajo. Many died along the way from exposure, starvation, exhaustion and violence from the US troops that escorted them.

The Navajo population went from roughly 25,000 to between 5,000 and 8,000, according to estimates.

The Navajo signed a treaty with the US government in 1868 which established a sovereign Navajo Nation that was still dependent on Washington.

As with many Indigenous peoples, the treaty between the US and the Navajo promised funding for healthcare, infrastructure - including that which contributes to water access - and other important areas.

However, the US government has continually failed to uphold agreements with the Navajo Nation, Charles claimed, citing a lack of funding for healthcare and infrastructure that has contributed to the challenges faced by the Navajo Nation.

"The infrastructure is never fixed. The treaty is never honoured", Charles said.

Underfunded

The Navajo, like other federally recognised tribes, are provided healthcare by the Indian Health Service (IHS), a US government agency. The IHS operates largely on reservations, but also maintains facilities in nearby communities.

But the IHS has been accused of "unacceptable" care.

"What we've found is simply horrifying and unacceptable. In my view, the information provided to this committee and witness first-hand can be summed up in one word: malpractice," Wyoming Republican Senator John Barrasso, who was then chairman of the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs, said at a hearing on the IHS in 2016.

A member of the Navajo Nation, receives his monthly water delivery in the town of Thoreau [Spencer Platt/Getty Images/AFP]

But the IHS has been chronically underfunded, presenting challenges to operations.

"The number of doctors, nurses, and dentists is insufficient," according to a report on the IHS prepared for the Interior Department cited by US media. "Because of small appropriations, the salaries for the personnel in health work are materially below those paid by the government in its other activities concerned with public health and medical relief."

The Trump administration has made increased funding for the IHS a priority, and the coronavirus pandemic has spurred this effort, according to IHS officials.

"President Trump has prioritised the health and well-being of American Indians and Alaska Natives throughout his presidency and the COVID-19 crisis," Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar said in a statement emailed to Al Jazeera.

Congress allotted tribal nations eight billion dollars in total for tribes in the $2.2 trillion CARES Act passed in March. The majority of the funds allotted for the IHS has been distributed, while other funds for Indigenous governments meant to lessen the economic impact of the pandemic were delayed by court cases.

The Navajo Nation had received roughly $600m of these funds by May 6, Nez confirmed to local media.

On May 22, Azar announced the Trump administration is "making a targeted allocation from the funds Congress provided to send $500 million to Indian healthcare facilities.

"Combined with other funding, supplies, and flexibility around telehealth, we are working with tribal governments to do everything we can to support heroic Indian healthcare workers and protect Indian Country from COVID-19", Azar said.

Indigenous resilience

For his part, Nez has claimed the US has "forgotten" about the Navajo Nation, although they are US citizens. But the "curve is flattening" on the Navajo Nation, Nez said in the release.

"Testing, contact tracing, and the public health orders that were implemented months ago requiring protective masks in public and weekend lockdowns are working and flattening the curve".

For Charles, the Navajo running for president, this is largely thanks to the efforts of the Navajo themselves.

"I applaud President Nez and the work that the entire Navajo Nation is doing. I recognise that it is because of this 250 year of this unreconciled injustice" that the situation has gotten to this point, Charles said.

"I call on the government to immediately begin to honour treaties that were signed and to begin to build true nation-to-nation relationships with Indigenous nations."



SOURCE: AL JAZEERA NEWS