Wednesday, February 02, 2022

Real earnings in America: Parsing strong wage growth amid high inflation

News outlets often report on inflation, but they don’t always cover the interaction between inflation and earnings. Keep reading to learn about real and nominal wages, different gauges of inflation and the importance of narrative.

(Joshua Hoehne / Unsplash)

On its face, 2021 was good for workers’ wallets. Average hourly earnings for most workers rose 6% from December 2020 to December 2021. In the two years since health officials identified COVID-19, average hourly earnings were up 12%, from $23.84 to $26.61, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Those figures are for what the bureau calls production and nonsupervisory employees, who draw their paychecks from a private company — not local, state or federal government agencies. This group includes workers involved in manufacturing, service and office jobs and makes up 81% of the private labor force.

That share has hardly budged in four decades.

Economists sometimes study the “production and nonsupervisory” category as a proxy for blue-collar workers, but it does not exclusively capture manufacturing, construction and other jobs typically considered “blue collar.” As long as an employee doesn’t supervise other employees, these workers include the caterer making $21 an hour, the car parts manufacturer making $24 an hour and the financial portfolio manager making $47 an hour.

Workers involved in construction, manufacturing and trade, transportation and utilities made up 37% of production and nonsupervisory employees in December 2021. Professional and business services, a category including lawyers, made up 17%. Other major categories include education and health services at 20% and leisure and hospitality at 13%. Information workers, which includes many news reporters, made up 2%.

The hourly earnings numbers don’t include the value of health insurance benefits or payroll deductions, such as tax withholdings, unemployment insurance or union dues. They do include overtime, sick and vacation pay. They come from the Current Employment Statistics survey, which the Bureau of Labor Statistics conducts each month among 145,000 businesses and government agencies. The bureau is an agency of the U.S. Department of Labor.

The numbers also do not tell the entire story of recent wage growth — because the value of money is not all told in raw numbers.

Nominal earnings, meet real earnings

The Department of Labor’s inflation calculation that gets widespread national and local news coverage is called the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers. That measure is based on prices for goods and services in 75 urban areas surveyed from 6,000 housing units and 22,000 retailers, such as supermarkets and gas stations. Inflation estimates are also available at the state level and for certain metropolitan areas.

Nationally, prices were 7% higher in December 2021 than at the end of 2020 among the categories, or “basket of goods,” the labor department tracks: food, energy, certain services, and commodities like clothing and cars. Excluding food and energy, which tend to have larger price swings than other product categories, inflation stood at 5.5%.

News outlets often report on inflation, but they don’t always cover the interaction between inflation and earnings. Each month, on the same day the labor department publishes inflation numbers, it also publishes a measure of wages adjusted for inflation, called real earnings. Those numbers show how far today’s dollars would have gone four decades ago. For production and nonsupervisory employees, average real earnings were $9.66 an hour in December 2021. That means the average $26.61 an hour those workers take home would have had the same purchasing power as $9.66 in the early 1980s.

Nominal wages are easier to understand,” says Stephanie Thomas, a senior lecturer in economics at Cornell University. “It’s what’s reflected in your paycheck. When you get your raise at the end of the year, if there’s an adjustment made, it’s given in terms of nominal dollars, so it’s something people are familiar with. The nominal, of course, isn’t adjusted for inflation and it’s really not reflective of the formal economic idea, which is the basket of goods that you are able to purchase with those dollars.”

All told, real earnings for production and nonsupervisory workers stand at roughly the same level as in March 2020, according to the Current Employment Statistics survey. The average spiked to over $10 an hour in April and May of that year, but those figures were skewed because lower-wage employees, like restaurant workers, lost their jobs.

The combination of higher prices along with lower-wage workers re-entering the workforce means hourly earnings for production and nonsupervisory workers are stagnant since the start of the pandemic shutdown. Still, real earnings for those workers are historically high when looking back over the past half century.

As the pandemic took hold, the lowest earners suffered more

The brief spike in real earnings to $10 an hour for most private employees has been attributed to what economists call “compositional” effects. That broadly refers to the composition, or makeup, of a group.

Think of the caterer making $21 an hour, the car parts manufacturer making $24 an hour and the financial portfolio manager making $47 an hour. Together, they make an average of $32. Take out the caterer, and the hourly average jumps to $36.

This is what happened at the start of the pandemic. Many in-person jobs, like those in restaurants and bars, temporarily went away.

“It’s worthwhile pointing out that price inflation of the goods that we buy erode wage increases we might enjoy,” says Stanford University economist John Pencavel, who studies inequality and earnings. “But we can’t do for each group of workers what we would like to do, and that is to measure the prices of the goods that they purchase.”

The goods and services the labor department tracks for its headline inflation data are meant to capture, at a high level, the things many American consumers purchase day to day. We don’t know, for example, what exactly a 40-year-old hotel receptionist in Lebanon, Pennsylvania buys each month. Aside from economists who study the hotel industry, there is probably not strong demand for such detailed data, Pencavel says. 

Inflation and the ‘power of narrative’

Some economists note the stories we hear from friends and family and on the news can matter greatly when it comes to rising inflation. As Paul Krugman put it in his Jan. 25 New York Times column: “What’s going on? Surely it’s the power of narrative.”

Based on falling consumer sentiment since 2020, Krugman supposes people think the economy is not doing well because they see and read news stories on topics like high inflation, yet they remain “relatively upbeat” about their personal finances.

“The idea that Americans are down on the economy because price increases have outstripped wage growth has hardened into conventional wisdom,” Krugman writes. “And there’s obviously something to that. But the political reaction is disproportionate to the actual decline in real wages, and I’d argue that journalists are missing a large part of the story if they fail to realize that.”

Economists often point to the pandemic stimulus legislation signed by Presidents Donald Trump and Joe Biden as putting more money in people’s pockets, and eventually driving up demand for goods and services that supply chains have been unable to meet. Simply put, people want to spend, but there is not enough of the stuff they want.

Some retailers can adjust prices quickly — think of the corner gas station bumping the cost per gallon when the price of crude oil shoots up. Others, like furniture stores, place orders weeks or months before their goods hit showrooms. Those retailers take a best guess at how future inflation rates might affect the number of couches they sell.

“This will cause inflation to persist even when the economy is no longer ‘overheating,’” writes Williams College economist Kenneth Kuttner in a Jan. 18 Econofact article. “Rising inflation expectations are largely to blame for the persistence of the inflation of the 1970s, which remained elevated well after the booms of the late 1960s, early 1970s had run their course.”

Other inflation and wage data worth tracking

The Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages is another labor department data series to keep an eye on. Its advantage is that it is a census, not a survey, meaning there is no sampling error. In a sample, researchers gather information from a small part of a larger group, then extrapolate findings for the overall group. A census conveys direct information for all, or almost all, members of the group. The quarterly employment and wage census covers about 95% of all jobs in the U.S., drawn from states’ unemployment insurance administrative records.

The downside is that it is published less frequently than the Current Employment Statistics survey — and there’s a lag. The most recent release, from December 2021, is for the second quarter of 2021, so it’s about six months behind.

Still, some relatively simple number crunching can be useful. A recent Pew Research Center analysis found that weekly wage gains through the first half of 2021 varied widely across sectors — and since 2019, local messenger and local delivery workers have seen the greatest gains of all, more than 111%. (Think couriers delivering documents and packages within a single city or urban area.) But, based on this data series, we don’t yet know how workers’ wages fared in the second half of 2021.

It’s also worth noting that the labor department inflation rate that garners headlines is not the primary inflation gauge the Federal Reserve uses to inform its monetary policy decisions. The Federal Reserve, the nation’s central bank, uses the Personal Consumption Expenditures price index from the U.S. Department of Commerce, though bank economists also track the labor department’s inflation measure.

The central bank has a “dual mandate,” meaning its policy measures have two overarching goals: to encourage low unemployment and maintain stable prices. It generally aims for annual inflation of about 2%.

The commerce department’s inflation measure, excluding food and energy, rose 4.9% in December 2021 compared with the year before — 0.6% less than the labor department’s inflation number. The Federal Reserve prefers the commerce department measure because it includes a larger basket of goods than the consumer price index. The labor department, however, breaks down real earnings by industry, which is useful for understanding the types of workers gaining or losing ground in their paychecks.

Economic realities may differ by industry

The economy is like a carefully calibrated steampunk machine. Adjust the pressure on one valve and something’s got to give elsewhere. Gauges can show whether the machine is chugging along or about to burst, but what’s happening to the individual components inside the machine can be difficult to see. That’s why it’s worth thinking about longer-term historical performance of real earnings and how current changes in those earnings fit into big picture inflationary trends.

Real earnings
The economy. (Pixabay)

For example, oil and gas workers saw their real earnings dip in the first half of 2014, rebound in the second half of that year, fall throughout 2015 and then bounce back strongly in 2016. Inflation was historically low, while oil prices fell dramatically from the end of 2014 into 2015, remaining at or under $60 a barrel until early 2018.

Going back further, in all but five years from 1980 to 2003 real weekly wages and salaries for private and public employees rose among the highest 10% of earners, while the lowest-paid 10% of workers saw their real earnings fall in 10 of those years, according to a 2005 Bureau of Labor Statistics analysis.

The point is not to parse why earnings for oil and gas workers fluctuated recently, or why high-wage earners fared better throughout the 1980s and 1990s, but rather to call attention to the fact that different types of workers may be experiencing very different economic realities depending on their industries and pay.

The value of employment beyond a paycheck

Consider the recent experience of workers in sport leagues, which rely on in-person attendance to stay financially solvent. The National Basketball Association, for example, put its season on hold on March 11, 2020, then resumed play without fans in the stands on July 30 at an ESPN sports complex near Orlando, Florida. As arenas shuttered at the start of the pandemic, the spectator sports workforce plummeted from 158,000 employees in February 2020 to 83,000 in May 2020.

The job erosion in the spectator sports industry came primarily from production and nonsupervisory workers, who accounted for 94% of the total job loss during that period.

Although many workers have regained jobs lost at the outset of the pandemic, the private labor force, at 127 million workers as of December 2021, is down 2.6 million from the February 2020 peak of 129.7 million. It’s now roughly the same size it was in November 2018. The current levels are a substantial rise from the April 2020 pandemic low of 108 million.

It’s worth underscoring the extreme initial effects the pandemic had on the labor market. There were 1.5% fewer production and nonsupervisory employees in March 2020 than the month before. Those jobs dropped another 17% by April 2020. There had never been a month-over-month swing of more than 1% in either direction since 1964 — the first year of available federal labor data for those workers — after accounting for regular seasonal employment changes.

Of the 21 million private sector jobs that evaporated from February to April, 19.6 million were among production and nonsupervisory employees. Those workers gained back 11.5 million jobs — 59% of the initial drop — by December 2020, the final full month of the Trump administration.

During the first year of the Biden administration, that group gained 4.9 million jobs, another 25% clawback from the initial pandemic shock. The group remains about 3.1 million jobs short of February 2020 levels. Those who are not production or nonsupervisory workers have gained half a million jobs since then.

That means production and nonsupervisory workers have not reached pre-pandemic employment levels. Some of those workers have retired and will not rejoin the labor force, part of a longstanding trend toward an aging American workforce and overall declining labor force participation rates. Other workers have dropped out of the labor force because they are discouraged and have given up trying to finding a job. And still others are missing work as they deal with lingering effects from COVID-19 infection.

Work is often about more than income — it is about self-worth and life stability. As Princeton University economists Anne Case and Angus Deaton write in their 2020 book, “Deaths of Despair and the Future of Capitalism,” jobs are “not just the source of money; they are the basis for the rituals, customs, and routines of working-class life. Destroy work and, in the end, working-class life cannot survive. It is the loss of meaning, of dignity, of pride, and of self-respect that comes with the loss of marriage and of community that brings on despair, not just or even primarily the loss of money.”

How to Get Teenagers to Read Important Books? Ban Them.


TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 1, 2022


When I was a young teenager near the middle of the last century, I asked the high school librarian if I could borrow J.D. Salinger’s The Catcher in the Rye. Why did I want to read it? she asked. I lied and told her my parents told me it was excellent literature.

The real reason I wanted to read The Catcher in the Rye was it had been banned from the library. I knew the librarian kept one copy behind her desk, and I was determined to get it. She reluctantly handed it to me. I read it voraciously.

There’s no better way to get a teenager to read a book than to ban it.

Which is why it was so clever of the McMinn County, Tennessee, school board to vote to remove Maus from its eighth grade curriculum. Maus is a Pulitzer-winning graphic novel by Art Spiegelman that conveys the horrors of the Holocaust in cartoon form. The board cited “objectionable language” and nudity.

Before the board made its decision, teenagers in McMinn County probably weren’t particularly eager to read about the Holocaust, even in the form of a graphic novel. But now that Maus has been banned for objectionable language and nudity, I bet they’re wildly trading whatever threadbare copies they can get their hands on.

Since it was banned, half the teenagers in America seem to have bought Maus (or insisted their parents do). Two weeks ago, the book wasn’t even in the top 1,000 of Amazon’s bestseller list. Now it’s hovering around number 1.

Way to go, McMinn County school board! Get teenagers all over America excited to read about the Holocaust!

Even the McMinn County school board has been outdone by the Matanuska-Susitna school board in Palmer, Alaska, which presumably had a more serious problem on its hands than getting teenagers excited to read about the Holocaust. It couldn’t even get them to read the great novels of American literature.

So the Matanuska-Susitna school board voted 5 to 2 to ban Invisible Man by Ralph Ellison, Catch-22 by Joseph Heller, The Things They Carried by Tim O’Brien, I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings by Maya Angelou, and The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald.

Brilliant! I bet nearly every teenager in Palmer, Alaska is now deep into these books. They’re probably having intense discussions about them online late at night, away from their parents and other snooping adults. “Why do you think Ellison called himself ‘invisible?’” “How did Angelou come up with those amazing metaphors?” “Why did Daisy Buchanan reject Jay Gatsby?” “Wait! Gotta go! My parents are right outside my room! Call back in 20 minutes!”

The Great Gatsby was required reading when I went to high school. I admit I never read it. Had it been banned, I probably would have devoured it.

Beginning last fall, at least 16 school districts in a half-dozen states have demanded school libraries ban Out of Darkness. It’s a young adult novel about a love affair between two teenagers, a Mexican American girl and Black boy, set against the backdrop of the 1937 natural gas explosion at a New London, Texas plant that claimed nearly 300 lives. The book received lots of favorable reviews and literary rewards, but only a handful of teenagers read before it was banned. Now, it’s hot.

It’s the cleverest marketing strategy I’ve ever seen. Publishers must be clamoring to have school districts ban their books. (Why haven’t my books been banned, dammit?)

An influential group called “No Left Turn” is partly responsible. Just take a look at their website of books “used to spread radical and racist ideologies to students.” (Here’s the link: https://www.noleftturn.us/exposing-books/) You can bet teenagers across America are now lining up to read them.


Robert Reich's writes at robertreich.substack.com. His latest book is "THE SYSTEM: Who Rigged It, How To Fix It." He is Chancellor's Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley and Senior Fellow at the Blum Center. He served as Secretary of Labor in the Clinton administration, for which Time Magazine named him one of the 10 most effective cabinet secretaries of the twentieth century. He has written 17 other books, including the best sellers "Aftershock,""The Work of Nations," "Beyond Outrage," and "The Common Good." He is a founding editor of the American Prospect magazine, founder of Inequality Media, a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and co-creator of the award-winning documentaries "Inequality For All," streaming on YouTube, and "Saving Capitalism," now streaming on Netflix.
Populist Parties in Europe Are Now Talking About Climate Change

An interview with Catherine Fieschi
Director of Counterpoint


Marine Le Pen’s party has been quite clever in the way that it talks about climate change. It has formulated a vision of climate that allows them to say, “What we want is a humanist climate policy.”
Photo: European Union 2015 – European Parliament” via CC BY-NC-ND 2.0

The political right is changing its attitude toward climate change in Europe. Populist parties no longer deny the existence of climate change. Instead, parties like AFD (Alternative for Germany) and the National Front in France are starting to use climate change as a way to attack the EU and to drum up anti-immigrant sentiment.

Catherine Fieschi is the director of Counterpoint, a U.K.-based group that carries out research on political trends and the dynamics of dissent and consent.

FIESCHI: Talk of climate is starting to feature in populist discourse, though slightly differently in Europe and in the United States. In the United States, populism and climate denialism — or at least very hard skepticism — still go hand in hand, partly because the United States is just a much more polarized society than most European societies.
 
Denialism No Longer Has Currency in Europe


In Europe, whereas populist parties are quite skeptical vis-à-vis climate policy, especially if it’s being mandated by the European Union, which they hate, there is little climate denialism. It is really a disagreement about who is responsible (do humans have anything to do with it), and what to do about it. So it is kind of a softer stance — though far from constructive.

In Europe, the populist parties felt that they couldn’t just duck out of the climate conversation; denialism doesn’t have currency. So, they’re being critical of the climate policies being put forward by the EU, rather than denying that there’s a problem.

There’s quite a range. For example, the Polish populist party in government (PiS) is much more climate skeptical than, say, Marine Le Pen’s Rassemblement National in France. But by and large, what they all have in common is that they’ve realized that they need to talk about this, but they don’t like the way that the EU or that national governments are proposing to talk about it.

We may end up with a populist government that’s going to be terrible on very basic rule of law and human rights issues, but quite good on climate policy because the deal will have been so sweet, in fact, impossible to turn down.

BRINK: So are we seeing a political philosophy that combines environmentalism with hard-right policies and anti-immigration?

FIESCHI: I don’t think any of them have adopted modern environmentalism — or ideas about the necessary energy transition, but there’s always been a romantic conservative notion about a people being linked to the land, and land deserving respect because it is linked to the “soul” of a people. The German Conservative Revolution, for example, closely linked the landscape to the nation.

There was always a resonance there about environmental protection in those terms. But this is a far cry from environmentalism — in part because in the conservative romantic vision, it is still all about humans (men in this instance) dominating nature.

There is huge disagreement over, say, wind turbines and anything that is perceived as threatening an iconic version of nature. There has been no mobilization in favor of any kind of climate policy: All the policies are invariably depicted as misguided or going against the interest of the least well-off.
The Right Is Linking Climate Change to Migration

There’s a very real connection between climate change and migration, as resources become scarcer in places where there’s already instability and corruption. The Sahel region is a perfect example: The combination of resource wars, corruption and instability, for instance in areas like the one around Lake Chad, has the potential to trigger the mass movement of millions and millions of people. We thought a million Syrians was a lot. We’re looking at four to six million people from that area being driven out, in a sense, by conflict.

So one might think, therefore, that populist parties might adapt their rhetoric and their narrative around this, and say, “Well, it is important to address climate change on a planetary or global level, because otherwise we will get mass migration.”

But that is not yet happening.

Instead, what most of them are doing is, in a sense, much less rational, and at the same time, much less sophisticated than that. Which is to say, “Well, we don’t think we should be spending so much time addressing the threat of climate change because the real threat is the threat to our borders.”

They haven’t yet said, “Look, we’re trying to take climate change really seriously, because otherwise, we’re facing massive immigration waves.” They haven’t got to that point. They still see it as a policy tradeoff. We either focus on climate change or we focus on migration.

The Rassemblement National, Marine Le Pen’s party, has been quite clever in the way that it talks about this; it has formulated a vision of climate that allows them to say, “Look, we understand that there’s a problem, but what we want” — and they use this expression, they say, “is a humanist climate policy.” What they mean by this is, we want a set of policies that puts humans first — the planet is an afterthought.

There is an undercurrent of a conspiracy theory that goes something like this: “These elites in Brussels or national governments want you to focus on climate, but it’s to encourage you to take your eyes off the main problem, which is migration and immigration. Which are at the root of the problem, and they have not been able to fix it.”

The EU Is Making Climate Policy a Condition for Funding

BRINK: Is there any willingness by the populists to accept that there has to be sweeping policy changes?

FIESCHI: I think given the amount of money that the EU is making available (as part of the COVID recovery package) but is conditional on implementing its climate framework (Fit for 55), some parties will eventually rally to these policies.

Poland, and the attitude of the governing PiS party, is interesting: It is locked in a war with the EU over issues of the rule of law (and specifically anti-gay discrimination), and it hates to be told what to do in terms of climate policy, especially as it still has an important coal industry. But it will eventually have to accept to implement some of the “Fit for 55” package or lose billions of Euros. They will be bribed into converting. But we are a long way from changing attitudes toward climate.
Climate Delayers Not Deniers

We may end up with a populist government that’s going to be terrible on very basic rule of law and human rights issues, but quite good on climate policy because the deal will have been so sweet, in fact, impossible to turn down. And they will still be resentful of elites that are making them jump through these hoops (all they talk about is the “humiliation” inflicted upon them by these climate demands).

BRINK: Is any of this getting traction among voters? Is this a winning strategy, do you think?

FIESCHI: If you mean popular support for populists, I think that it is a winning strategy with some of their voters, because it allows them to claim both a kind of victim status, but also that they did the right economic thing for their people. “We are doing it and we are doing it for our people, but we’re doing it against our will.”

We’re seeing a version of this, not just in populist parties, but in relatively mainstream conservative parties in Europe. The conservative party candidates running in the presidential election here in France, all of them, though they are not climate deniers, they’re certainly climate delayers. They too, they would tend to agree with the populists, that this is a hysterical reaction to something that actually technology and science can fix.
Share this Article
Americans Think N95 and KN95 Masks Are The Most Effective – But They Aren’t Wearing Them, Poll Finds

The Harris Poll
A woman wearing a face mask walks on a street in New York City on Jan. 19. 
XINHUA NEWS AGENCY VIA GETTY IMAGES

By: Alison Durkee | Forbes | Jan 26, 2022

More Americans think that N95 and KN95 masks are effective against Covid-19 than believe the same of surgical or cloth masks, but they wear them less, a new Harris poll suggests, highlighting the importance of the White House’s rollout of free N95 masks to make them more accessible.

KEY FACTS

The poll, conducted January 21-23 among 2,120 U.S. adults, found 86% of respondents believe N95 and KN95 masks are protective against the spread of Covid-19.

That’s higher than the 75% who believe surgical masks are effective and 55% who say cloth masks are protective (68% if the mask includes a filter).

However, only 29% said they actually wear a N95 or KN95 mask, versus 33% who wear a surgical mask and 36% who use a cloth mask.



Some 62% of respondents said they’d wear the higher-quality masks “if price and availability were not an issue.”

BIG NUMBER

400 million. That’s how many free N95 masks the Biden administration will distribute through pharmacies and community health centers. Masks started becoming available last week shortly after the program was announced, and White House Covid-19 coordinator Jeff Zients said Wednesday the initiative will “hit full strength” over the next few weeks, with “tens of thousands” of sites distributing masks across the country.

KEY BACKGROUND

N95, KN95 and KF94 masks—high-quality respirators regulated by the U.S., China and South Korea, respectively—have become increasingly important amid the rapid spread of the omicron coronavirus variant. It is highly transmissible, and experts say cloth masks and surgical masks are less effective against it. (Surgical masks are made of a better quality material than cloth masks, but aren’t as well-fitting as N95s.) An increasing number of businesses, governments and schools have updated their mask rules to require better-quality masks as a result, with places like Utah’s Salt Lake County requiring people to wear respirator masks indoors and Los Angeles mandating employers provide them for workers and barring children from wearing cloth masks in school.
TANGENT

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says Americans should “wear the most protective mask you can, that fits well and that you will wear consistently,” but the agency has resisted calls to recommend people wear N95 or KN95 masks—even as its website notes they’re more protective when worn properly.

A Swedish company plans on using crows to pick up cigarette butts
The birds have previously been trained to pick up litter.

By Alejandra O'Connell-Domenech | Feb. 1, 2022
This June 27, 2012, photo shows a crow dive-bombing a bicyclist as he crosses the Morrison Bridge in Portland, Ore. For the past two months people crossing the west end of the Morrison Street Bridge have been dodging a crow that's been protecting a nest. From morning to night the bird swoops down from the sky, flying inches from the heads of unsuspecting bicyclists and pedestrians. Frequent travelers have taken to protecting themselves with umbrellas and hoods while keeping their eyes to the sky as they dash to the other side. (AP Photo/Rick Bowmer)


Story at a glance

A Swedish city has come up with a creative new way to address its cigarette butt problem.

The company, called Corvid Cleaning, is located in Södertälje just south of Stockholm.
Cigarette butts are the most common form of plastic pollution.

A Swedish company plans on using crows to pick up cigarette butts from city streets.


The birds will receive a small amount of food for every butt they pick up and drop into a bespoke machine designed by the startup called Corvid Cleaning located in Södertälje, just southwest of Stockholm, according to The Guardian.


“They are wild birds taking part on a voluntary basis,” Christian Günther-Hanssen, the founder of Corvid Cleaning, told The Guardian. Günther-Hanssen believes the method will cut down the cost of cigarette butt cleanup in the city by 75 percent.

Cigarette butts are the most abundant form of plastic pollution in the world with about 4.5 trillion individual butts being tossed every year. And while cigarette filters can take up to 10 years to completely decompose, the chemicals they release during the process, including arsenic, lead and nicotine, can linger in the environment for longer.

In Sweden, more than 1 billion cigarette butts are tossed on the streets each year and make up 62 percent of the country’s litter, according to The Keep Sweden Tidy Foundation. The city of Södertälje alone spends 20 million Swedish kronor, over $2 million, on street cleaning.

In 2018, half a dozen crows were trained to pick up cigarette butts at a French theme park and dump them in a box as part of a larger effort to encourage human visitors to throw their used butts in the garbage, according to The New York Times.

The effort though is just one example of how the birds are intelligent enough to take on the task of street cleanup.

A Black coach just sued the NFL for racial discrimination -- here are the most stunning allegations

Brad Reed
February 01, 2022


Former Miami Dolphins coach Brian Flores on Tuesday filed a lawsuit against the National Football League that alleged racial discrimination against Black coaches.

The lawsuit features several explosive claims that depict NFL owners as not being serious about hiring Black coaches -- and then working to undermine Black coaches on the occasions they do get hired.

Here are some of the most damning claims Flores made.


1.) Dolphins owner Stephen Ross didn't take Flores seriously as a long-term solution at the head coach position and urged him to deliberately lose to improve the team's draft position.

Flores alleges that, shortly after he was hired as head coach, Ross urged him to "tank" the team's season with the aim of securing the top overall pick in the draft.

In fact, Flores claims that Ross offered to pay him an extra $100,000 for each loss -- and was allegedly angry when Flores won too many games.

2.) Members of the Denver Broncos front office allegedly showed up appearing visibly hung over to Flores's interview.

In another example showing how NFL franchises don't take Black coaches seriously, Flores claims that former Broncos General Manager John Elway and other team executives showed up late to their interview with him.

What's more, Flores claims that the executives "looked completely disheveled, and it was obvious that they had [been] drinking heavily the night before."

Flores then alleged that it was clear that they only bothered interviewing him to fulfill a quota that states teams must interview a certain number of Black coaches.

3. Text messages appear to show that the New York Giants had already decided to hire a white coach even before they brought Flores in for what he believes was another token interview.

In texting with Patriots head coach Bill Belichick, who was Flores's boss before he got hired by Miami, Flores expressed hope that he would get hired by the Giants.

Belichick, thinking that he was actually talking with recently hired Giants head coach Brian Daboll, congratulated Flores on getting hired by the team and he said that he heard from sources that "you are their guy."

Belichick realized his mistake and replied to Flores that "I f*cked this up" and "I think they are naming Daboll."

The decision to hire Daboll apparently occurred before Flores was even interviewed.

Read more about the lawsuit at The Sporting News.

Bill Belichick's Accidental Texts Surface In Lawsuit Alleging Racist NFL Hiring Practices

"Sorry – I f****d this up. I double checked & I misread the text," Belichick told former Florida Dolphins coach Brian Flores in one message.

By Sebastian Murdock
02/01/2022 

A number of accidental texts from New England Patriots head coach Bill Belichick are at the center of a class action lawsuit by fired Miami Dolphins coach Brian Flores, who has made accusations of racist hiring practices in the NFL.

“Sorry ― I fucked this up,” Belichick texted to Flores, after accidentally revealing that Flores had not gotten the job of the New York Giants’ head coach ― before Flores could even interview for the position.

In a lawsuit filed Tuesday in Manhattan federal court against the NFL and three of its teams, Flores, who is Black, alleged that racist hiring practices by the league have left it racially segregated and “managed much like a plantation.”

Flores, who was fired last month by the Dolphins after leading the team to a 24-25 record over three years, said in the lawsuit that the league discriminates against Black coaches, denying them positions as head coaches and other roles. In the suit, Flores said he was fired from the Dolphins after he refused to hire “a prominent quarterback in violation of League tampering rules.”

“Even when Black candidates get hired for Head Coaching positions, a rarity, they are discriminated against in connection with the terms and conditions of their employment and compensation and terminated even as far less successful white Head Coaches are retained,” the lawsuit reads. “Moreover, Black Head Coaches are far less likely than white Head Coaches to receive second chances even as white Head Coaches are routinely hired by Teams even after they fail elsewhere.”

In the suit, Flores said the head coaching job for the Giants had been decided before he ever had a chance to interview. Brian Daboll was announced as the new head coach last week.

“The Giants had the chance to hire Mr. Flores, an eminently qualified Black man, to be the first Black Head Coach in the Giants’ nearly 100-year history,” the lawsuit reads. “Instead, the New York Giants made the decision to hire Brian Daboll ― and disclosed that decision to third parties ― during a time when the Giants were scheduled to still interview Mr. Flores and when Mr. Flores was deceptively led to believe he actually had a chance at this job.”

Flores released a series of texts between himself and Belichick in January that appear to show that Belichick knew Daboll had been picked for the job before Flores ever had the chance to interview. The texts to Flores were meant for Daboll, with whom Flores shares a first name.

“Sounds like you have landed ― congrats!!” Belichick wrote in a text sent to Flores.

“Did you hear something I didn’t hear?” Flores asked.

“Giants?!?!?!” Belichick texted back.

After Flores told Belichick that he had not yet interviewed for the job, Belichick replied that “you are their guy.”

“Coach, are you talking to Brian Flores or Brian Daboll,” Flores wrote. “Just making sure.”

“Sorry ― I fucked this up,” Belichick responded. “I double checked & I misread the text. I think they are naming Daboll. I’m sorry about that.”

Flores still interviewed for the job the following week.

“The Giants would likely have gotten away with this most insidious form of discrimination if New England Patriots Coach Bill Belichick had not mistakenly disclosed it to Mr. Flores” via text message, the lawsuit reads.

In a statement, the Giants said the team stands by its hiring of Daboll.

“We are pleased and confident with the process that resulted in the hiring of Brian Daboll,” the team said in the statement. “We interviewed an impressive and diverse group of candidates. The fact of the matter is, Brian Flores was in the conversation to be our head coach until the eleventh hour. Ultimately, we hired the individual we felt was most qualified to be our next head coach.”

The NFL said the claims in the lawsuit are “without merit.”

“The NFL and our clubs are deeply committed to ensuring equitable employment practices and continue to make progress in providing equitable opportunities throughout our organizations,” the league said in a statement. “Diversity is core to everything we do, and there are few issues on which our clubs and our internal leadership team spend more time. We will defend against these claims, which are without merit.”
Lumber tariffs, with some dropping, as trade dispute continues

The final decision on rates won't be known until August, and Canadian producers will be paying average rates of 18 per cent until then, according to the B.C. Lumber Trade Council.



Author of the article:
Bloomberg News
Jen Skerritt and Eric Martin
Publishing date: Feb 01, 2022 • 
Finished lumber is seen at West Fraser Pacific Inland Resources
 sawmill in Smithers, British Columbia.


The U.S. is setting duties on Canadian softwood lumber that would effectively lower the punitive tariffs on most producers as the long-simmering trade dispute drags on.

Average preliminary anti-dumping and countervailing duties of nearly 12 per cent will be levied on Canadian softwood lumber producers, the U.S. Department of Commerce said Tuesday in an email.

The move follows the government’s decision in late 2021 to raise the combined duty rates on shipments from Canadian companies. For producers such as Canfor Corp. the combined duty rates drop from nearly 20 per cent to 6.75 per cent. Resolute Forest Products will pay duties of 20 per cent, down from nearly 30 per cent. But West Fraser Timber’s tariffs will rise to 13 per cent from about 11 per cent.

The final decision on rates won’t be known until August, and Canadian producers will be paying average rates of 18 per cent until then, according to the B.C. Lumber Trade Council.

“We continue to hope that the U.S. industry will put an end to this decades-long litigation and instead work with us to meet demand for the low-carbon wood products the world wants,” Council CEO Susan Yurkovich said Tuesday in a statement.

The Trump administration slapped tariffs on Canadian softwood lumber in 2017, saying Canada’s industry is unfairly subsidized. While the move supports U.S. producers, it also adds costs for U.S. builders who get more than a quarter of their lumber from Canada.

The U.S. raised rates on Canadian lumber imports in 2021 even as an unprecedented rally lifted prices to record highs during a pandemic-fueled home-building and renovation boom. An index of framing composite lumber has more than tripled since late August, adding to the cost of an average new home in the U.S.

Lumber futures pulled back in January, signaling that soaring costs and transport bottlenecks will crimp demand.

Canada is the world’s largest softwood lumber exporter and the U.S. is its biggest market.

“The U.S. Department of Commerce is indicating with these preliminary results that it intends to maintain its unjustified duties on imports of Canadian softwood lumber,” Canada’s international trade minister Mary Ng said in a statement, noting duties hurt forestry sector business and workers across Canada.

“They are a tax on American consumers and reduce the affordability of housing for American home buyers at a time when housing prices are already at record highs.”

The Biden administration’s move to reduce the tariffs is an important step to addressing America’s “housing affordability crisis,” Chuck Fowke, chairman of the U.S. National Association of Home Builders, said in a statement.

Swings in the lumber market have added more than US$18,600 to the price of a new home since late summer, and the industry is urging the U.S. to negotiate with Canada on a new softwood lumber agreement to eliminate duties, he said.

U.S. Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo said Tuesday at a Senate hearing that she supports finding a lasting solution for the Canada softwood lumber issue to end the need for anti-dumping and countervailing duties.

Bloomberg.com