Wednesday, February 02, 2022

Democrat Asian caucus leader warns against encouraging xenophobia in debate on China competition bill

BY CRISTINA MARCOS - 02/01/22 


© Greg Nash

The leader of the Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus is urging fellow lawmakers to avoid relying on "fear of China" during debate on pending legislation to boost U.S. competitiveness and supply chains so as not to encourage xenophobia.

The House is expected to pass a sprawling legislative package later this week designed to encourage more domestic production of key goods and services, invest in more scientific research, and address the current shortage of semiconductor chips to make the U.S. more competitive globally in line with nations like China.

It also includes provisions to exert diplomatic pressure on China in the form of imposing sanctions for its human rights abuses against the Uyghurs and providing temporary protected status and refugee status for qualifying Hong Kong residents.

But Rep. Judy Chu (D-Calif.), the chair of the Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus, has urged colleagues in recent days to focus their messaging "on how this legislation will help Americans and our economic security."

Framing it as a race against threats from China, Chu warned, risks stoking anti-Asian sentiment that has led to violence against Asian Americans.

"We should not rely on fear of China to make our case. That will both obscure the policies in this bill while encouraging more xenophobia from those who give credence to Cold War rhetoric painting Chinese people and those perceived to be Chinese as an existential threat," Chu wrote in the letter to colleagues, which The Hill obtained on Tuesday.

"How we speak about this moment and how we rise to meet it will unquestionably have an impact on the lives and safety of Asian Americans across the country. I urge us all to keep that in our minds as we begin to debate this important legislation," Chu wrote.

A statement from the Biden administration on Tuesday formally endorsing the bill as it heads to the House floor notably didn't include any mention of China.

Instead, in line with Chu's guidance, the statement praised the bill as "aligned with the president’s vision to enhance American economic and scientific competitiveness; build a stronger, more diverse, and more inclusive innovation ecosystem; and invest in strengthening critical supply chains, our domestic industrial base, and regional economic growth and development."

Similarly, a statement from Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) after House Democrats unveiled the legislation last week did not mention China.

Republicans on Tuesday questioned the strategy of avoiding any mention of China altogether during discussion of the legislation.

"It's disgraceful the @WhiteHouse Statement of Administration Policy on the bill @SpeakerPelosi claims is a counter #China bill doesn't even contain the word China. This is proof #COMPETES is not a serious effort to combat the generational threat posed by the CCP," tweeted Rep. Michael McCaul (Texas), the top Republican on the House Foreign Affairs Committee.

The Senate passed its version of the legislation last June, which was framed as an effort to make the U.S. more competitive with China. Since then, House Democrats have broadened their version of the bill to include provisions to bolster the domestic supply chain to help address the product shortages and inflation that have been at the top of voters' minds in recent months.

Chu previously advised fellow lawmakers on how to discuss China without using rhetoric that could encourage anti-Asian sentiment that's led to a spike in hate crimes during the COVID-19 pandemic.

In a July memo, Chu and other members of the Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus urged lawmakers to specifically target any criticism of the Chinese government to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), rather than China as a whole.

And instead of calling COVID-19 the "Chinese virus" since it was first identified in China, they recommended using its official medical names.

Lawmakers last year enacted the COVID-19 Hate Crimes Act, which directs the Justice Department to expedite the review of hate crimes related to the pandemic. It also requires the Justice Department and Department of Health and Human Services to issue guidance aimed at raising awareness of hate crimes during the pandemic.

CRIMINAL CAPITALI$M

Credit Suisse must face investors’ currency rigging lawsuit in New York

FILE PHOTO: Logo of Swiss bank Credit Suisse is seen in Basel

NEW YORK (Reuters) – A U.S. judge on Tuesday refused to dismiss a class-action lawsuit by investors accusing Credit Suisse Group AG of conspiring to rig prices in the approximately $6.6 trillion-a-day foreign exchange market.

Credit Suisse is the last bank defendant remaining in the antitrust litigation that began in 2013, after 15 others reached $2.31 billion of settlements.

U.S. District Judge Lorna Schofield in Manhattan said it was premature to accept Credit Suisse’s claim that it was not part of a single global conspiracy to widen foreign exchange spreads.

But she also rejected the investors’ bid to hold Credit Suisse liable, saying the question of whether there was a single conspiracy or multiple smaller conspiracies must be answered before determining whether and how Credit Suisse might have been involved.

“Questions remain about the scope of the shared illegal goal and extent of the conspirators’ mutual dependence and assistance,” Schofield wrote.

Credit Suisse declined to comment. Lawyers for the investors did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

The class period runs from December 2007 to December 2013.

Investors have accused Credit Suisse traders of sharing nonpublic pricing information with traders at other banks, including in chat rooms with such names as “Yen Cartel.”

The earlier settlements followed regulatory probes that culminated in more than $10 billion of fines for several banks, and the convictions or indictments of some traders.

Some investors including BlackRock Inc and Allianz SE’s Pimco chose to “opt out” of the investor litigation. Investors typically do that when they hope to recover more by suing on their own.

The case is In Re Foreign Exchange Benchmark Rates Antitrust Litigation, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 13-07789.

(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York)

Republicans Attempting to Dismantle Milwaukee Public Schools and Expand Vouchers

Written By JT CESTKOWSKI
FEBRUARY 1, 2022 
The Milwaukee Public Schools administration building is shown. (Photo via Milwaukee Public Schools/Facebook)

Critics label the effort to break up public schools “an attack on the foundation of our democracy: public schools.”

Republicans in the Wisconsin Legislature are proposing breaking up Milwaukee Public Schools (MPS) during the next two years and increasing educational opportunities for charter and choice schools, a move public education advocates say would cause significant damage to public schools in Milwaukee and elsewhere across the state.

Sen. Alberta Darling (R-River Hills), who chairs the Senate Education Committee, circulated an email to Republican lawmakers Friday outlining a package of bills that included the fracturing of MPS. The move is part of a bill package that proposes sweeping changes to the state’s K-12 education system that would include expanding private school vouchers to all parents by removing income restrictions.

According to Wisconsin Public Radio, the bills would dissolve MPS by July 1, 2024, and replace the system with four to eight smaller districts drawn by a commission appointed by the governor, Milwaukee mayor, and state superintendent. MPS, the state’s largest district, serves 71,000 students—90% of whom are students of color and 87% of whom are economically disadvantaged, according to state data.


“It’s one more attempt to get rid of Milwaukee Public Schools and get rid of the democratically elected school board,” Milwaukee School Board President Bob Peterson told WPR. “It’s an attack on the very foundation of our democracy: public schools.”

RELATED: Democrats Try Again to Stop Letting Voucher Schools Hide Their True Cost From Taxpayers

The bills will be co-sponsored by Sen. Roger Roth (R-Appleton), and Reps. Rick Gundrum (R-Slinger), Jeremy Thiesfeldt (R-Fond du Lac), and Bob Wittke (R-Racine). Republicans have said too many schools in Milwaukee and some other locations have failed students, and parents should have more options on where to send their children.

Public school backers said students at many MPS schools perform well academically, and those where too many students are struggling should be given more resources, not fewer. Wisconsin public schools receive per-pupil state aid payments, and enrollment losses to private schools mean fewer dollars for public ones.

Gov. Tony Evers, a Democrat, is likely to veto the proposal if it passes the Legislature. The governor has supported using the state’s $3.8 billion budget surplus to send money back to Wisconsinites and invest in education to bolster school districts like MPS. Republicans have said that idea is a nonstarter.

Wisconsin public education advocates criticized the proposal as yet another attack against public schools. The bills would switch financial resources from public to private schools at a time when public education is already underfunded, especially in the face of costs related to the ongoing coronavirus pandemic, they said.

Calling the plan “a financial nightmare” for public schools, Wisconsin Public Education Network Executive Director Heather DuBois Bourenane said it is particularly disingenuous given the state’s budget surplus. The Legislature’s near flat-lining of education spending as part of the 2021-23 state budget and its repeated failure to address such educational needs as a teacher shortage and students’ mental health needs is “fiscally irresponsible and morally reprehensible,” she said.

“This proposal is radically extreme,” she said. “It completely lays bare the full scope of [Republicans’] priority to dismantle and disregard our public schools.”

Other public school backers expressed similar sentiments. Jill Underly, state Superintendent of Public Instruction, said she welcomes input from the Republican-led Legislature regarding Wisconsin’s schools, but the proposed bills would harm public education.

“These proposals are a polarizing and disingenuous distraction from the real needs of students, families, and educators, and they do nothing to help our schools, which have suffered greatly during this pandemic. They do nothing to help public schools and instead will cause great harm,” Underly said in a statement.
Israel's NSO offered 'bags of cash' for access to US cell networks: Report
US Justice Department is conducting a probe into NSO, according to the Washington Post


NSO has faced a deluge of criticism over reports that its software has bee
used to target activists and journalists from around the world (AFP/File photo)

By MEE staff
Published date: 1 February 2022

Israel's NSO Group, the company at the centre of a global hacking-for-hire scandal, offered to give representatives of a US mobile-security firm "bags of cash" in exchange for access to global cellular networks, the Washington Post reported on Tuesday, citing a whistleblower's confidential disclosures to the Justice Department.

Gary Miller, a mobile phone security expert, alleged in his disclosure to the Justice Department that NSO made the offer during a call with his then-employer, Mobileum, a company that provides security services to cell companies.

The NSO representatives were specifically seeking access to the SS7 network, which helps cellular companies route calls and services as their users roam the world.

"The NSO Group was specifically interested in the mobile networks," said Miller, a former Mobileum vice president who now works as a mobile-security researcher for Citizen Lab, a leading critic of NSO.


Pegasus: MBS called Netanyahu to renew Saudi Arabia's NSO license, report says
Read More »

"They stated explicitly that their product was designed for surveillance and it was designed to surveil not the good guys but the bad guys."

In Miller's account, which dates back to 2017, when one of Mobileum’s representatives asked how such an arrangement would work, NSO allegedly said: "We drop bags of cash at your office."

In a statement, NSO said that it had "never done any business with" Mobileum and that it "does not do business using cash as a form of payment".

Mobileum chief executive Bobby Srinivasan also issued a statement saying, "Mobileum does not have - and has never had - any business relationship with NSO Group".

The Washington Post also reported that the Justice Department is conducting a criminal investigation into NSO over allegations that its clients have illegally hacked phones, citing four people familiar with the probe. NSO said it is not "aware of any DOJ investigation".

The sources said the probe concerns allegations of unauthorised intrusions into networks and mobile devices in the US using NSO technology, such as Pegasus.

The US Justice Department declined the newspaper's request for comment.

'Doesn't smell right'

Earlier this week, an investigative report by the New York Times stated that NSO's Pegasus software was used by Israel as a core part of its diplomatic policy.

NSO has been involved in numerous scandals in recent years and has faced a deluge of international criticism over reports that its software has been used to target political dissidents, activists and journalists around the world.

The company says its Pegasus software helps fight crime, but investigators have found it on the phones of journalists and dissidents.

It is currently facing lawsuits from the messaging service WhatsApp, as well as tech giant Apple, over the use of its spyware.


'Having such access would allow the NSO to spy on vast numbers of cellphones in the United States and foreign countries'

- Congressman Ted Lieu

In November, the US Department of Commerce placed NSO on a list of foreign companies that engage in malicious cyber activities, barring American companies from working with them and stripping the Israeli company of access to key US technologies such as computers and phones.

The FBI also interviewed a US citizen in detail last year about a Pegasus hack, a source told the Post. The alleged hack happened while this person was travelling overseas and using a phone with a foreign phone number.

The NYT reported that the FBI purchased the Pegasus spyware, and NSO planned to offer the US agency new, never-before-seen spyware named Phantom. The US agency, however, ultimately decided against using the software.

Last year, Miller shared his account with Congressman Ted Lieu, who has a long-standing interest in cellular security. Lieu shared redacted copies of Miller's disclosures with the Paris-based journalism non-profit organisation Forbidden Stories, which shared them with the Pegasus Project, a global journalism consortium investigating NSO.

"Having such access," Lieu said in his referral to the Justice Department, "would allow the NSO to spy on vast numbers of cellphones in the United States and foreign countries."

The congressman told the Post that NSO's activities appear "really fishy, and it doesn’t smell right, and that’s why I want the Department of Justice to investigate".

The Justice Department also declined the newspaper's request for comment on the complaint filed by Lieu.
Study Finds 65% Of Americans With Mental Health Conditions Want Access To Psychedelics

The Harris Poll
The Mexican magic mushroom is a psilocybe cubensis, a specie of psychedelic mushroom whose main active elements are psilocybin and psilocin - Mexican Psilocybe Cubensis. An adult mushroom raining spores. red and blue color. horizontal orientation. GETTY

By: Lindsey Bartlett | Forbes | Jan 18, 2022

A new study conducted by The Harris Poll and Delic Holdings Corp found that 65% of affected Americans want access to psychedelics for mental health.

Respondents who self-reported that they suffer from a mental health condition say that psychedelic medicine including ketamine, psilocybin mushrooms, and MDMA, should be made available to patients with treatment-resistant anxiety, depression, or PTSD.

“The pandemic has skyrocketed the need for psychedelic wellness,” says Delic CEO Matt Stang. “We’re at a tipping point where the data and science regarding psychedelic therapies have become undeniable in treating a variety of serious conditions.”

As it stands, ketamine is legal in the U.S. for medical use. Ketamine is an FDA-approved anesthetic and can be prescribed for a myriad of ailments in a regulated setting by licensed clinicians. Psilocybin, like cannabis, is still considered a Schedule 1 drug in the eyes of the federal government. Therefore, its sale and use is illegal, despite some states and cities that have begun to decriminalize mushrooms. Beginning in 2019, psilocybin has been decriminalized in Denver, Oregon, and Santa Cruz. The state of California even has a measure on the 2022 ballot that would decriminalize psychedelic medicine in the state.

Psychedelic wellness companies like Delic are eager for this legal movement. It echoes the beginning of the weed industry we know today, as states began decriminalizing prior to legalization several decades ago. The largest clinical study to date affirms psilocybin’s efficacy in treatment-resistant depression. Ketamine has even more substantial clinical research backing up its use for depression, anxiety, and PTSD.

Delic acquired Ketamine Wellness Centers (KWC) in November 2021. Today, Delic runs the largest chain of psychedelic mental health clinics in the U.S., operating 12 ketamine wellness clinics. The company has plans to open an additional 15 clinics in the next 18 months. Stang says his team founded Delic in order to improve people’s lives and offer access to lifesaving medicine.

The Harris Poll study found 83% of Americans experiencing anxiety, depression or PTSD would be open to pursuing alternative treatments. Respondents said that if plant medicines were “proven more effective than prescription medication with fewer side effects,” 66% would try ketamine, 62% would try psilocybin, and 56% would try MDMA.

18% of people surveyed said that traditional pharmaceutical medication did not improve their condition or even made it worse. The survey was conducted from December 6 to 8, 2021, polling 2,037 adults ages 18 and older. Among them, the survey polled 953 people who suffer from anxiety, depression, and/or PTSD.

“Delic Labs is developing analytical capabilities that will help form a complete picture of psychedelic medicine and ensure drug safety,” says Dr. Marcus Roggen, President & Chief Science Officer of Delic Labs.

“In the area of medical developments, psilocybin and other plant-based compounds show great promise, but also have their limitations,” says Dr. Roggen. “With our medicinal chemistry expertise as the foundation, we will continue to explore these novel psychedelic compounds and other drug candidates with the goal of adding them to this exciting field of medicine.”
Psilocybin in Delic’s lab. DELIC

The group demographics varied. “Of the people who participated, 48% identified as male and 50.9% identified as female. In regard to age, we saw a wide variety of respondents with 28.4% aged 18-34; 16.7% aged 35-44; 15.9% aged 45-54; 16.6% aged 55-64 and 21.5% over the age of 65. In regard to race, 61.8% identified as white, 16.5% identified as Hispanic and 11.8% identified as Black,” says Stang.

The survey is not comprehensive, and the respondents self-reported, which can leave room for potential bias. “This survey is not based on a probability sample and therefore no estimate of theoretical sampling error can be calculated,” says Stang.

“We truly believe the world will look back on this moment right before full global acceptance and remark how much more effective treatment has become, in a very short time,” says Stang. “This promising family of new medicines has the potential to be more effective than traditional medicines with minimal side effects.”

In 2021, the company hosted its inaugural Meet Delic psychedelic medicine conference, one of the largest psychedelic wellness industry conferences in the world, which welcomed 2,500 attendees. Tickets are on sale for its 2022 event which will take place November 5 and 6, 2022, in Las Vegas, Nevada.

Delic is listed on the Canadian Securities Exchange (CSE: DELC), the OTC Market’s Group (OTCQB: DELCF) as well as Germany’s largest stock exchange market called the Frankfurt Stock Exchange (FRA: 6X0).


Alcoholism Treatment Successfully Tested On Monkeys Could Help Treat Humans


By Ashley Palya

Treating alcoholism has taken a step in the right direction.

A peer-reviewed study published in Cell Metabolism on Tuesday states that it found that a hormone known as FGF21 can suppress alcohol consumption in “non-human primates.” The researchers used a colony of green vervet monkeys on St. Kitts island that are predisposed to finding and consuming alcohol to conduct the study.

“Just as in humans, a certain percentage of monkeys exhibit an innate preference for alcohol,” Kyle Flippo, a neuroscientist and pharmacologist at the University of Iowa, told The Daily Beast. He explained it could be due to genetic traits that are passed down from earlier generations.

The group of monkeys saw a 50% reduction in alcohol intake after exposure to the hormone. The findings are “the first illustration that FGF21 analogs potentially reduce alcohol consumption in non-human primates,” Flippo said.

Due to primates being closer to humans in physiology than mice, which are commonly used in studies like these, the researchers believe this can help get “clinical trial testing” approved at a quicker rate.

The researchers are confident that FGF21 can eventually lead to a new kind of treatment for alcoholism in humans

According to the National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, there are around 15 million people in the U.S. that have an alcohol use disorder, and about 95,000 people die every year from alcohol-related deaths.

Airline says it will stop monkey shipments after Penn. crash

The airline that flew a load of monkeys to the U.S. who were later involved in a highway wreck says it will stop this shipments this month

Kenya Airways will not renew its contract with the shipper when it expires this month, airline CEO Allan Kilavuka said in an email to The Associated Press.

Kilavuka did not identify the shipper who paid the airline to fly the animals from Mauritius, an island nation in the Indian Ocean, to New York.

On Jan. 21, a truck towing a trailer with 100 monkeys collided with a dump truck on a Pennsylvania highway. Several of the monkeys escaped. Authorities said later that three were shot and killed and they accounted for the rest.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which assisted local authorities after the crash and escape of some of the monkeys, said Tuesday that the monkeys are at an approved quarantine facility. A CDC spokeswoman declined to give the location of the facility or say what the lab intended to do with the monkeys.

Cynomolgus monkeys are often used in medical research because their DNA resembles that of humans, and they have been in high demand since the beginning of the pandemic for testing vaccines.

Monkeys were in short supply even before the pandemic. A 2018 report by the National Institutes of Health said half of researchers had trouble finding enough animals, which led to talk of talk of creating a “strategic monkey reserve.”

Nearly 27,000 non-human primates were imported into the U.S. in the 12-month period ending Sept. 30, 2020. That was down 21% from the previous year because of restrictions from the leading exporter, China, according to a CDC report.

The use of animals in research is controversial, however, and animal-rights groups have called for banning or limiting the practice.

After the Pennsylvania crash, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals lobbied Kenya Airways to stop shipping monkeys to the unidentified lab in the U.S. The group said monkeys sent to labs are “tormented in experiments” that can cripple or kill them, and the research fails to produce treatments for humans.

On Tuesday, PETA asked U.S. Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg to investigate shipments of primates for research, saying it believes shippers are violating rules governing hazardous materials — in this case, monkeys that might carry disease.

Animal-rights groups in the United Kingdom and the United States have targeted airlines to stop shipping monkeys for research since the 1990s.

Most major airlines have stopped carrying research animals. In 2018, a biomedical trade group filed a discrimination complaint with the U.S. Transportation Department against United Airlines, British Airways and other carriers. The filing has drawn more than 1,000 comments.

Air France remains a holdout, according to animal-rights groups, despite years of pressure from primate expert Jane Goodall and various celebrities. The airline did not respond to a request for comment, but in the past it has said that research involving animals is vital to human health.

———

David Koenig can be reached at www.twitter.com/airlinewriter


Questions Remain After Highway Crash

Involving Monkeys

A Pennsylvania woman who had contact with them says she has signs of illness, but no one else has reported symptoms. And the airline that shipped them is getting out of the business.


Crates holding live monkeys were scattered across the road after an accident near Danville, Pa., on Jan. 21.
Credit...Jimmy May/Bloomsburg Press Enterprise, via Associated Press


By Michael Levenson
Feb. 1, 2022

In the 11 days since a truck hauling 100 monkeys from Mauritius crashed in Pennsylvania, one woman who got close to the scattered crates of monkeys on the highway has been treated for possible symptoms of illness.

And Kenya Airways, which is believed to have transported the monkeys to the United States, has decided not to renew its expiring contract to ship research primates here.

No other reports of possible illness related to the crash have emerged, according to state and federal health officials, who said it was not known whether the Pennsylvania woman’s symptoms were related to the cynomolgus macaques, which were being quarantined and monitored for diseases.

Experts said that direct exposure to monkey saliva or feces could be dangerous, but that the risk of a broader outbreak was low.

The woman, Michele Fallon, 45, of Danville, Pa., said on Tuesday that she had been given two doses of the rabies vaccine, antiviral medication and antibiotic eye drops after she had a runny nose, a cough and filmy buildup and crust in her eye. She also vomited over the weekend, she said, possibly because of the antiviral medication.

She said her eye was much improved and that she was “feeling better,” though she still felt “queasy.”

She said she was awaiting the results of a blood test for monkey-borne diseases and was grateful for advice she had been receiving from Dr. Lisa Jones-Engel, a primate scientist who works with People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, which has long opposed primate research and has asked two federal agencies to investigate the crash.

Ms. Fallon said she was driving home on Jan. 21 in Montour County, about 150 miles northwest of Philadelphia, when she saw the crash, in which a dump truck hit a pickup truck that was hauling a trailer with the macaques. The monkeys had arrived at Kennedy International Airport in New York and were on their way to a quarantine facility.

Ms. Fallon stopped to see if anyone was hurt and found crates strewn across the roadway.

Told by a bystander that cats might be inside, she stuck her finger in one and saw brown fur. When the animal made a “weird noise,” she put her face closer to get a better look. That’s when, she said, she noticed that it wasn’t a cat but a monkey, which “hissed” at her. She said she felt a mist

She also stepped in monkey feces, she said.

That night, she went to a party with people who later tested positive for the coronavirus, she said. Ms. Fallon said that while she herself had tested negative, the series of events added up to “the worst day of my life.”

Three of the monkeys escaped after the crash, but were quickly found and “humanely euthanized,” the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said, without offering further details.

The C.D.C. referred questions about Ms. Fallon’s condition to the Pennsylvania Department of Health and her doctor, saying it does “not provide clinical care for individuals.”

Barry Ciccocioppo, a spokesman for the Department of Health, said in an email: “It is not known if that individual’s medical condition is related.”

“We take any report of exposure to these nonhuman primates very seriously,” Mr. Ciccocioppo said. “The Department of Health recommends that anyone who thinks they may have been exposed to a nonhuman primate to contact their health care provider.” The doctor can then consult with the department about the risks and best course of treatment, he said.

Ms. Fallon’s doctor’s office referred questions to the Geisinger health system, which did not immediately respond to an email and phone call.

In a letter issued to the authorities after the crash, the C.D.C. said that anyone who was within five feet of the monkeys’ crates without respiratory and eye protection should monitor themselves for signs of illness such as fever, fatigue, cough, diarrhea and vomiting.

The letter noted that monkeys and humans are naturally susceptible to many of the same diseases. It said the surviving monkeys would be quarantined and monitored for infectious diseases for at least 31 days.

Mr. Ciccocioppo described the letter as “precautionary and a form letter used in such incidents.”

Michael L. Kull, the chief of the Valley Township Fire Department, said that he and other emergency personnel who responded to the crash did not get close enough to the monkeys to risk any kind of infection.

“Out of an abundance of caution, we will be careful,” he said, but added that he was unconcerned. “I have lost no sleep.”

Dr. Christine Petersen, director of the Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases at the University of Iowa, said serious diseases like monkey pox and Ebola are rare in cynomolgus macaques, but that “precaution should be taken” by anyone who may have come into contact with one.

“A cornered monkey is not the kindest of creatures,” she said. “If they did get bitten or spit on, that’s worrisome.”

“But what are the odds that any three random monkeys could somehow spread something dastardly to a first responder?” Dr. Petersen added. “It’s not high.”

Dr. Suresh V. Kuchipudi, a clinical professor in the department of veterinary and biomedical sciences at Pennsylvania State University, said that so long as someone who has been too close to a wild animal like a macaque is receiving treatment for any infection, the risk of it spreading to other people is low.

Public health concerns were not the only fallout from the crash.

After PETA contacted Kenya Airways, the company said last week that it would not renew its contract for the transportation of macaques when it expires this month. In doing so, it joined several airlines, including major American carriers, that have refused to transport animals used in medical research.

PETA claimed victory in a news release. It has also asked the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the U.S. Department of Transportation to investigate the crash, warning of a dangerous lack of oversight for the transportation of primates.

“U.S. laboratories haven’t been able to prevent tuberculosis, cholera, campylobacteriosis, Chagas’ disease or other deadly pathogens from infecting the monkeys they cage and experiment on,” Dr. Jones-Engel said in a statement, “and they still put these monkeys on trucks that travel our highways nationwide.”



Monkeys Escape After Truck Crashes on Pennsylvania Highway
Jan. 21, 2022


A version of this article appears in print on Feb. 2, 2022, Section A, Page 10 of the New York edition with the headline: Questions Remain After Crash in Pennsylvania Involving a Truckload of Monkeys. Order Reprints | Today’s Paper | Subscribe


No vaccine, no entry: A civic good, or creeping tyranny?

Christa Case Bryant/The Christian Science Monitor
Sameer Chaudhry of New York, who opposes proof-of-vaccination requirements, attends the Defeat the Mandates rally on the National Mall in Washington Jan. 23. He says his sign was inspired by George Orwell's classic book "1984," in which people are punished for "thought crimes."


February 1, 2022
By Christa Case Bryant
Staff writer
The Christian Science Monitor
WASHINGTON

Nestled along a corridor bustling with streetcars and restaurants 10 blocks from the U.S. Capitol, neighborhood eatery Fare Well was until recently best known for its vegan comfort food. Tired of sprouts? Try their buffalo wings, or award-winning cupcakes.

But on Jan. 23, the restaurant became yet another battleground in the nation’s vaccine mandate wars. Owner Doron Petersan says a dozen-plus people showed up to protest their proof-of-vaccination requirement, calling the staff “Nazis” and “dictators.” She had instituted the policy in September, four months before Washington’s citywide mandate took effect, out of concern for the well-being of her employees – one of whom recently lost a parent to COVID-19.

Just across the street – but a world apart – The Big Board, a burger joint, does not ask customers to show vaccine cards at the door but simply welcomes them in. The restaurant has been repeatedly warned, has been fined $2,000, and had its liquor license suspended last week for violating the city’s new vaccine requirement. Initially at least, its stance wasn’t bad for business. On a recent Friday night, the restaurant was packed, with some patrons saying they came out just to show solidarity. But by Tuesday, the city had ordered the restaurant to shut down until further notice.

The debate over vaccine mandates for indoor spaces is particularly black and white: Citizens are literally either in or out. Part of what’s fueling the division is a lack of clarity about what exactly local leaders are trying to accomplish.

Washington is one of 10 metro areas – along with New York, San Francisco, New Orleans, Los Angeles, Seattle-Bellevue-Redmond, Chicago, Philadelphia, Boston, and Minneapolis-St. Paul – that now require proof of vaccination for certain indoor public spaces. That has elicited cheers from their mainly liberal residents, who see vaccination as a civic duty to protect the broader community and help bring an end to the pandemic. Critics, on the other hand, see such requirements as onerous and an unjustified exercise of government control.

On Jan. 23, thousands of protesters – some of whom traveled across the country – rallied on the National Mall against federal, local, and employer vaccine mandates. The rally featured a controversial list of speakers including Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Dr. Robert Malone, who critics say are spreading misinformation about COVID-19 and vaccines.

One factor fueling the division is a lack of clarity around what the policies are actually meant to achieve. When New York City introduced its mandate in August, vaccines were widely believed to be the best tool in preventing the spread of COVID-19. But with a wave of breakthrough cases linked to the omicron variant, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) now saying vaccinated individuals can transmit the virus, that’s left citizens and restaurateurs debating the merits and demerits of the requirements. Frustrated and exhausted by the extended disruption to “normal” life, proponents and opponents often blame the other for prolonging pandemic suffering. And when it comes to requirements that leave people literally in or out, it can be particularly hard to find common ground.
Impact on businesses, minorities

Washington’s requirement is being phased in, with proof of partial vaccination required by Jan. 15 and full vaccination a month later. Those with religious and medical exemptions can show a negative test instead.

“We all have a responsibility to keep our community safe,” said Mayor Muriel Bowser. “And it is true that we’re asking our businesses to do more, but we also think that this is a benefit to their business.”

Rory Richardson, assistant general manager at Pinstripes, an Italian bistro and bowling alley in the Georgetown neighborhood, says the requirement hasn’t been as hard to implement as he’d anticipated. Initially he or another manager stood at the front to check vaccine cards, but soon the hosts were able to take over the task.

He’s less sure about the impact on business. While January and February are often a little slow, Mr. Richardson says, it’s seemed slower than usual – though much of that may be because of the recent surge in cases. Still, they had to cancel contracts with a company that brought 100 tour groups through last spring, due to unvaccinated students in the coming groups.

Christa Case Bryant/The Christian Science Monitor
Caple Green, owner of Eclectic Cafe in Washington, D.C., has been trying to encourage his customers to get vaccinated by sharing information from public health officials like Dr. Anthony Fauci. The "Proud Black Vax Small Business" sign was given to him by a group trying to boost vaccination rates among the city's Black population.

Caple Green, owner of Eclectic Cafe in northeast D.C., also says business is down a bit. “It could be the vaccine, but it could be the climate,” he says, noting that it’s the coldest January he can remember since he moved here from Jamaica.

On his storefront, Mr. Green has displayed a “Proud Black Vax Small Business” sign. It’s part of a broader effort to shift opinion among Washington’s 46% Black population; among Black residents under age 40, vaccination rates trail those of their white counterparts by double digits.

At the Jan. 23 rally, a local white protester who works with public employees expressed concern that D.C.’s mandate is discriminatory because it will disproportionately impact Black residents.

Mr. Green says he doesn’t see it that way.

“The citizens are resistant,” he says, as MSNBC plays in the background. “The city is doing their best.”

Outside, a woman waiting for a bus says that she was initially hesitant about the COVID-19 vaccines, because she worried they were developed too fast.

“But I had to think real hard about my job,” she adds, explaining that she works in a school system and is not quite at retirement age. Now she’s waiting on her booster. Having just lost a brother to COVID-19, she has little sympathy for people who are shut out of restaurants. “If they don’t want to get vaccinated, they can eat at home,” she said, declining to give her name before boarding the bus.
What’s best for business?

In nearby Virginia and Maryland, residents are watching D.C.’s implementation closely. Montgomery County, Maryland, where 95% of residents are at least partially vaccinated, is considering implementing a similar mandate but faced significant opposition from members of the business and Hispanic communities at a recent hearing.

Across the river in Arlington, Virginia, Lisa DiConsiglio wishes her community would implement a similar mandate – but it can’t do so without the state government’s permission. And newly elected GOP Gov. Glenn Youngkin campaigned against vaccine mandates.

While opponents say the decision should be left up to individual businesses, Ms. DiConsiglio says that places an undue burden on the business.

As founding board member and manager at Westover Farmers Market in Arlington, she says it wasn’t too hard to enforce the governor’s mask mandate, despite pushback from a minority of customers. But it got much harder when the governor lifted the mandate and the farmers market opted to continue it. “Although as a private enterprise we were fully in our right to require masks, I had no backup for enforcement,” she says.\

Mary Josephine Generoso, a lifelong New Yorker who runs two cafes with her husband, says she complied with all regulations, including masks, social distancing, and temperature checks. But when the city implemented its vaccine mandate last summer, it was a step too far. She put up a sign that said, “We do not discriminate against ANY customer based on sex, gender, race, creed, age, vaccinated or unvaccinated.” While she worried it might hurt their business, she says there’s actually been an outpouring of support, from customers scrawling supportive notes on napkins to postcards and even donations from all over the country.

There have been a handful of outbursts, she says, including from a longtime customer whose son is an EMT. “She said, ‘I love your place, but I can’t come now because you’re not keeping people safe,” recounts Ms. Generoso, who chose not to get vaccinated because she believes she has immunity after getting COVID-19 early on.

Gripping hand warmers as she walked back to her car after attending the Jan. 23 Defeat the Mandates rally in Washington, she compares the current acceptance of vaccine mandates to the adoption of the Patriot Act after 9/11. At that time, she believed it was necessary to give the government expanded powers and sacrifice some civil liberties in order to keep the nation safe. Now she sees that as a mistake, just like the mandates.
Debate over the goals of mandates

One of the mandates’ implied rationales – stopping transmission in the community – has been complicated as new variants emerge.

A CDC online summary about the omicron variant says vaccines are expected to protect against severe illness, hospitalizations, and death, but breakthrough cases are likely among the vaccinated and vaccination does not stop transmission. “CDC expects that anyone with Omicron infection can spread the virus to others, even if they are vaccinated or don’t have symptoms,” it says. It adds that vaccines provide the best public health tool for protecting people against COVID-19, and recommends vaccinated people age 12 and older get a booster.

“I don’t know why you’d continue to hold up this ‘vaccinated vs. unvaccinated’ when we know that both can get [COVID-19] – and spread it as well,” says Angela, a federal employee attending the Jan. 23 rally who did not want to give her last name while the vaccine mandate for fede mandates are “doing what they think is right for themselves and their families.

“But I hope they come to see that the truth is somewhere in the middle – and be willing to look at data that contradicts what they think they know,” he says. He adds that he’s trying to do that, too. “We’re in this together.”

This story was updated at 8:20 p.m. on Tuesday, Feb. 1, 2022, to reflect the District of Columbia’s decision to order The Big Board to close until further notice.
The Catholic Church is no stranger to banning books—and we know it (almost) always backfires.


James T. Keane
February 01, 2022
Photo by Freddy Kearney on Unsplash


Banned! The news last week that Art Spiegelman’s 1986 graphic novel about the Holocaust, Maus: A Survivor’s Tale, had been removed from school curricula by a Tennessee school board (for obscenity and nudity, the latter of which involved not humans but…mice) was a reminder of one of our nation’s favorite pastimes: book bans. The American Library Association reports it received an unprecedented 330 reports of “book challenges” last fall, usually involving books that deal with issues that are flashpoints in national cultural battles: sex, gender identity and social mores. The move will likely backfire—it almost always does—and Maus is already climbing the ranks of the best-seller lists, 36 years after its publication.

The news that Maus, a graphic novel about the Holocaust, had been removed from school curricula by a Tennessee school board was a reminder of one of our nation’s favorite pastimes: book bans.

One of the most famous novels to be banned in the United States was James Joyce’s Ulysses, which for almost 12 years after its publication in 1922 was outlawed in the United States. When the ban was finally lifted in December 1933, one strong objector to its publication was America’s literary editor at the time (and the editor in chief from 1936 to 1944), Francis X. Talbot, S.J. Despite what would otherwise appear somewhat cosmopolitan literary tastes for a priest at the time, Talbot detested Joyce, and made his feelings clear in a 1934 essay in the magazine:

The book was written in a new technique, in a pseudo-English, of words that were sometimes normal, sometimes foreign, sometimes archaic, sometimes merely a succession of letters, meaningless and inane. Many of the words were scummy, scrofulous, putrid, like excrement of the mind. The words are listed in the dictionary, but never in the writings or on the tongue of anyone except the insane, or the lowest human dregs. The critics said how brave. The sexual neurotics said how lovely. The normal person said I'm sick.

Ultimately, Talbot said, Joyce would not be a topic of discussion for long, because the book was not of a quality that would merit it any audience outside of those simply looking to be titillated or amused. “Only a person who had been a Catholic, only one with an incurably diseased mind, could be so diabolically venomous toward God, toward the Blessed Sacrament, toward the Virgin Mary. But the case of ‘Ulysses’ is closed,” he wrote. “All the curiosity caused by the extraneous circumstances of its being banned is over. It has now subsided into just a book. It will be discussed, undoubtedly, in the little literary pools of amateurs and young Catholic radicals. But for the most part it is in the grave, odorously.”

Well, Father Talbot may have been wrong about the book’s lasting influence, but no one could question his verve. I suspect Joyce would rather like him if they had ever met. But it is a dangerous thing to argue for the banning of a book, because in the end the mob can be somewhat indiscriminate in whom they come for. Maus was ostensibly banned for the same reason as Ulysses—a vague notion that it was obscene—but what if the real motivation was that it is about the Holocaust?

One could gin up a dozen reasons in half a minute to ban almost everything we read in school: Huckleberry Finn is racist, as are C. S. Lewis’s Narnia novels. Dr. Suess is this close to being canceled; Judy Blume is a regular on the list of books parents clutch their pearls over when they are found in the school library. But isn’t it O.K., every now and then, for our children to read something unsettling?

This issue raised its head at, of all places, Duke University in 2015, when students and parents complained that the required reading for incoming freshmen, Alison Bechdel’s graphic novel Fun Home, was pornographic and promoted alternative lifestyles. I wrote about the kerfuffle in America at the time (It amounted to nothing; students afraid they would be scandalized by the book were allowed to opt out), and thought back to the church’s long history of book banning itself.

“Our irony, in the world of Catholic literature and academia, is that no group should fear the good intentions of the censors more than Catholic intellectuals themselves,” I wrote then. “It wasn’t long ago that Rome was actually blacklisting Graham Greene and other novelists in the Index of Forbidden Books, to say nothing of the academic theologians silenced by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. Why? Because good Catholics needed to be protected from harmful literature.

“Laughable, isn’t it? That we once thought so little of people that we assumed they’d be permanently damaged if they read the wrong thing.”

One could gin up a dozen reasons in half a minute to ban almost everything we read in school.




•••

James T. Keane  is a senior editor at America.
A JESUIT JOURNAL
Two male penguins welcome hatchling as New York zoo's 1st same-sex foster parents

A pair of male penguins named Elmer and Lima just became the first same-sex couple to foster an egg together at New York's Rosamond Gifford Zoo. They've been taking care of the chick since he hatched on Jan. 1.
CREDIT: ROSAMOND GIFFORD ZOO


BY Rachel Treisman
FEB 01, 2022 
NPR

The Rosamond Gifford Zoo in Syracuse, N.Y., has at times used foster parents to incubate penguin eggs — but those couples have always been made up of one male and one female.

Last year, after testing their fostering capabilities, zoo staff decided to entrust one of those eggs to two males: Elmer and Lima. The pair welcomed a healthy chick on Jan. 1, making them first-time dads and the zoo's first same-sex foster parents to successfully hatch an egg.

"Elmer and Lima's success at fostering is one more story that our zoo can share to help people of all ages and backgrounds relate to animals," said zoo director Ted Fox.

Elmer and Lima hatched at the zoo in 2016 and 2019, respectively, and formed a pair bond for the current breeding season, the zoo said in a release. They are both Humboldt penguins, which hail from South America and are classified as "vulnerable" because of climate change and habitat loss.

As part of the Species Survival Plan for Humboldt penguins, the zoo has its own sizeable penguin colony and has hatched more than 55 chicks over nearly two decades.

It explained that several breeding pairs have a history of accidentally breaking their fertilized eggs (that's what happened to Elmer, who is named after the glue used to repair the damaged egg from which he later emerged). To try to increase the eggs' odds, zoo staff have at times replaced one couple's egg with a "dummy egg" and transferred the original to another couple to incubate.

That's where Elmer and Lima come in. The two paired up in the fall of 2021, building a nest and defending their territory. The penguin team then decided to test their fostering skills — which not all penguins have.

"Some pairs, when given a dummy egg, will sit on the nest but leave the egg to the side and not incubate it correctly, or they'll fight for who is going to sit on it when," Fox said. "That's how we evaluate who will be good foster parents — and Elmer and Lima were exemplary in every aspect of egg care."

The team determined on Dec. 23 that an egg laid by another couple — female Poquita and her mate Vente — had a viable embryo inside, and gave it to Elmer and Lima for incubation.

It hatched on Jan. 1 and weighed 8 ounces at its first health check five days later. A spokesperson for the zoo told NPR that the chick is a boy and has yet to be named.

Fox said the male penguins took turns incubating the egg before it hatched, and have been warming and feeding the chick since.

"It continues to be brooded and cared for by both Elmer and Lima, who are doing a great job," he added. "And once they have experience doing this and continue to do it well, they will be considered to foster future eggs."

The zoo is celebrating Elmer and Lima as its first successful same-sex foster parents. But while their journey is relatively rare, it's certainly not the first of its kind in the U.S. or even the world.

Other same-sex penguin pairs who have fostered chicks at zoos in recent years include Electra and Viola, female Gentoo penguins in Spain; Skipper and Ping, male king penguins in Berlin; and Eduardo and Rio, male Magellanic penguins in San Francisco.

Some older high-profile, same-sex penguin relationships have ended in heartbreak, as NPR has reported. Others are still going strong.

They include Sphen and Magic, who fostered two chicks together and recently celebrated their third anniversary to much fanfare.

The SEA LIFE Sydney Aquarium describes them as a "same sex penguin power couple" who became a symbol of Australia's gay rights movement when they got together in 2018. (They've outlasted such celebrity relationships as Elon Musk/Grimes and Camila Cabello/Shawn Mendes, the aquarium notes).

Here's hoping Elmer and Lima can follow in their webbed footsteps.

This story originally appeared in the Morning Edition live blog. [Copyright 2022 NPR]