Saturday, August 27, 2022

The Ghosts of August 26, 2021

"They are, and were, not perfect in every regard. But they

 were to me."

IT WAS AUGUST 26, 2021, and Staff Sgt. Jonathan Eby, a platoon sergeant in charge of several dozen U.S. Marines, was about to walk outside Abbey Gate for the last time.

At that point, the Marines had been in Afghanistan for a week—they were dog tired and dirty—defending a gate alongside a putrid canal at the Hamid Karzai International Airport (HKIA) in Kabul, becoming witnesses to unspeakable horror day in and day out.

A post shared by Jonathan Eby (@ghost.1b)

“People were being crushed to death,” one Marine recalled to investigators.

Crowds in the thousands had surged outside the airport walls in the days after the Taliban seized the capital city and the Afghan government quickly collapsed. But the Marines and thousands of troops deployed there had nevertheless been given a mission: save as many people as possible before the clock runs out on August 31.

“I remember the constant threat notifications. Knowing that each passing minute added likelihood to incident,” Eby wrote on Instagram earlier this year, recalling a platoon briefing for Ghost 1—the 1st Platoon of Ghost Company, 2nd Battalion, 1st Marine Regiment—before they left the relative safety of HKIA’s walls at around 4 p.m. that day, moved into the crowd, and continued to hold the line for a massive U.S. military operation to exit Afghanistan that would end in the rescue of more than 120,000 people.

A post shared by Jonathan Eby (@ghost.1b)

“How do you ask men to do that? You don't,” Eby wrote. “You just go and hope they follow. I never had to look back, I knew they were behind me.”

Not long after, an Islamic State terrorist pushed through the crowd and approached the U.S. military checkpoint, detonating a suicide vest that killed an estimated 170 Afghans and 13 American troops. Nine were from Ghost.

“They are, and were, not perfect in every regard,” Eby wrote of them, his platoon of mostly 18 to 20-somethings who called the veteran sergeant ‘dad’ and whom he lovingly referred to as ‘kiddos.’

“But they were to me,” he wrote. “And they mean so much more to their families, friends, and loved ones.”


YOU SHOULD KNOW THE NAMES of the 13 American heroes who died at that gate, trying like hell to save as many lives as possible before that horrific end to a miserable war that had gone on for too long. They were:

  1. Marine Staff Sgt. Darin T. Hoover, 31, of Salt Lake City, Utah

  2. Marine Sgt. Johanny Rosario Pichardo, 25, of Lawrence, Massachusetts 

  3. Marine Sgt. Nicole L. Gee, 23, of Sacramento, California 

  4. Marine Cpl. Hunter Lopez, 22, of Indio, California

  5. Marine Cpl. Daegan W. Page, 23, of Omaha, Nebraska

  6. Marine Cpl. Humberto A. Sanchez, 22, of Logansport, Indiana

  7. Marine Lance Cpl. David L. Espinoza, 20, of Rio Bravo, Texas

  8. Marine Lance Cpl. Jared M. Schmitz, 20, of St. Charles, Missouri

  9. Marine Lance Cpl. Rylee J. McCollum, 20, of Jackson, Wyoming

  10. Marine Lance Cpl. Dylan R. Merola, 20, of Rancho Cucamonga, California

  11. Marine Lance Cpl. Kareem M. Nikoui, 20, of Norco, California

  12. Navy Hospitalman Maxton W. Soviak, 22, of Berlin Heights, Ohio

  13. Army Staff Sgt. Ryan C. Knauss, 23, of Corryton, Tennessee

These men and women were sons, daughters, sisters, brothers, husbands, and dads who were taken far too soon and are greatly missed. They were the very best of America. And ever since that terrible moment, Eby—the Ghost platoon sergeant—has been revealing their heroism, warmth, and humanity on Instagram at his account @ghost.1b, while preserving many more stories of the fallen and surviving Ghosts of August 26, 2021.

“I started this to remind myself, the Marines of Ghost1, and their families how not forgotten or lost their memory is to me,” Eby wrote “...There is still more you should know. I look forward to sharing it with you.”

THESE ARE a few of those memories that you should know about:

‘You can’t make men like’ Sgt. Jonathan Painter

A post shared by Jonathan Eby (@ghost.1b)

After being engulfed in flames and receiving shrapnel that went through his helmet and gashed his face, Sgt. Painter, the 3rd squad leader, rallied his squad “through his decisive leadership” and worked side by side with Eby to carry the wounded to safety.

“You can't make men like this. Sgt Painter is, and will forever be, one of my heroes,” Eby wrote.

Lance Cpl. Michael Gretzon took shrapnel to the arm and kept in the fight

A post shared by Jonathan Eby (@ghost.1b)

Michael Gretzon was bleeding after taking shrapnel to the arm, but according to Eby, the lance corporal “simply switched his weapon to his other hand and got on security, scanning rooftops and barriers deeper for a cameraman or to prepare for a follow-on attack.”

Lance Cpl. Romel Finley’s positivity kept Ghost’s spirits up

A post shared by Jonathan Eby (@ghost.1b)

The suicide blast knocked Finley from the canal wall onto the ground, sending shrapnel into his hip, leg, and neck and causing temporary paralysis to his face.

“Passion and positivity provided by Finley helped to get us through our time at HKIA,” Eby wrote. “Always smiling, even in the pictures we'd see in the days that followed when we were stuck in Kuwait.”

Lance Cpl. Jordan Houston hid a wound so he wouldn’t be evacuated

A post shared by Jonathan Eby (@ghost.1b)

Lance Cpl. Jordan Houston was wounded and momentarily knocked unconscious when the bomb went off. When he came to, he evacuated others to the hospital, where he was checked out.

Houston was discharged that night, but days later when he was back with the platoon in Kuwait, he admitted to Eby that something was still wrong.

“He was using band-aids he had to cover a wound in secret, concerned he would be whisked away from the rest of us,” Eby wrote. “He wasn't the only one we found out that did that. No one wanted to leave each other. No one wanted to be anywhere else but with the platoon.”

These stories and photos represent only a small slice of what you can find on Eby’s account, which you can find here.

Thanks for reading,

Paul


Massive hack reveals anti-LGBTQ Liberty Counsel may have broken IRS rules

Two of Liberty Counsel's affiliated nonprofits seemingly endorsed Trump for president. IRS rules prohibit such endorsements.

By Daniel Villarreal Friday, August 26, 2022

Photo: Shutterstock


A massive hack of the Liberty Counsel — a right-wing Christian legal advocacy group that has been certified as an anti-LGBTQ hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center (SLPC) — has revealed that its affiliated nonprofits may have broken IRS tax rules forbidding nonprofits from endorsing candidates for political office.

The hack — carried out by an unknown person affiliated with the Anonymous hacktivist collective and published online at the website Enlace Hacktivista — contained several hundreds of gigabytes worth of web pages, emails, documentation, and financial donor data from Liberty Counsel and its affiliated nonprofits, including Liberty Counsel Action, Faith & Liberty, and Christians in Defense of Israel.

In a press release the hacker wrote, “Noticing a worrying trend of far-right and anti-abortion activists aligning themselves with the evangelical Christian movement, hiding their funding sources behind laws that allow church ministries to keep their donations secret, we decided to bring about some much-needed radical transparency.”

Liberty Counsel Action is designated by the IRS as a 501(c)(4) nonprofit organization, which allows it to endorse or oppose candidates for office. However, the IRS designates Faith & Liberty and Christians in Defense of Israel as 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations. As such, they’re forbidden by the IRS from endorsing or opposing candidates for office.

The investigative news website The Intercept found emails from Faith & Liberty and Christians in Defense of Israel encouraging supporters to vote for then-President Donald Trump in the 2020 election.

Two weeks before Election Day, Christians in Defense of Israel sent out an email that said, “Israeli Jews support President Trump, because they know under a Trump administration, America has Israel’s back … and peace in the Middle East is on the near horizon,”

On Election Day 2020, a Faith & Action email referenced right-wing reports that then-candidate Joe Biden had helped his son Hunter Biden by using “American tax-dollars to bribe foreign nationals to protect his son’s behavior,” adding that Joe Biden “felt so comfortable with this level of corruption that he even bragged about it, on camera.”

“A great responsibility rests on our shoulders,” the group’s email stated. “Our decision will determine who will nominate judges, and so much more.”

The hack also revealed that Liberty Counsel and its affiliated nonprofits also solicited donations by repeating Trump’s lies about the 2020 election being “stolen” and spreading right-wing conspiracy theories about government plans to institute “vaccine passports” that would track and monitor people’s movements.

The hacker gained access to Liberty Counsel’s data by discovering vulnerabilities in Site Stacker, a customer relationship management software used by the Liberty Counsel and developed by WMTEK, a company that builds software for Christian nonprofits. The hacker found that a WMTEK administrator used the password “Password1” which provided access to WMTEK’s other clients.

As a result, the hacker obtained membership and donor records from over 90 other Christian nonprofits. WMTEK’s CEO Dan Pennell declined to comment to The Intercept.

The Liberty Counsel has long represented bigoted clients who use the guise of “religious liberty” to oppose any expansion of LGBTQ civil rights.

The IRS is unlikely to take action against any of Liberty Counsel or its affiliated groups because of the IRS’s lax enforcement of such rules. But the Liberty Counsel isn’t the only SLPC-certified anti-LGBTQ hate group trying to skirt IRS rules.

In early August, 40 members of Congress wrote an open letter asking the IRS and Treasury Department to investigate the anti-LGBTQ hate group Family Research Council and other far-right organizations that have tried to avoid federal taxes and audits by registering as churches.
THIRD WORLD U$A
Some cities could be left behind on lead pipe replacements

By MICHAEL PHILLIS

1 of 5

Workmen prepare to replace older water pipes with a new copper one in Newark, N.J., Thursday, Oct. 21, 2021. Lead pipes have caused harm for decades. In recent years, residents in Newark and Benton Harbor, Mich., were forced to use bottled water for basic needs like cooking and drinking, after tests revealed elevated levels of lead. (AP Photo/Seth Wenig, File)


ST. LOUIS (AP) — In many cities, no one knows where the lead pipes lie underground. That’s important because lead pipes contaminate drinking water. After the lead crisis in Flint, officials in Michigan accelerated efforts to locate their pipes, a first step toward removal.

But other places are moving more slowly.

That means as billions of dollars in new federal funding becomes available to address the problem, some places are in a better position than others to quickly apply for funds and start digging.

Those that wait are at risk of being left behind.

“The issue right now is we want to reduce the time that vulnerable folks are living with lead exposure,” said Eric Schwartz, co-CEO of BlueConduit, which uses computer modeling to help communities predict where their lead pipes are.

In Iowa, for example, only a handful of cities have located their lead water lines and so far only one – Dubuque – has asked for newly-available federal funds to remove them. State officials still expressed confidence they will find their lead lines by the federal government’s 2024 deadline and communities will have time to apply for funds.

Lead in the body can lower IQ, stunt development and cause behavior problems in children. Lead pipes can leach into drinking water. Removing them eliminates the threat.

There are millions of lead pipes in the ground, installed decades ago, that carry tap water to homes and businesses. They are concentrated in the Midwest and Northeast but are present across much of the country. Scattershot record keeping means many cities don’t know which of their water pipes are made of lead versus PVC or copper.

Some places like Madison and Green Bay, Wisconsin, have managed to remove theirs. But it’s an expensive problem and historically there’s been little federal funding to address it.

“The lack of resources has been a huge issue,” said Radhika Fox, head of the Environmental Protection Agency office of water.

President Joe Biden signed an infrastructure bill last year that finally provided a big boost, allocating $15 billion over five years to assist communities with lead pipes. It’s not enough to solve the problem, but will help.

Communities that avoid the issue or wait too long may not be eligible.

“If you don’t get your act together and you don’t submit an application, you’re not going to get the money,” said Erik Olson of the Natural Resources Defense Council.

Local officials can start replacement work before they complete a detailed inventory, but it helps to have an estimate of where lead pipes are, said Eric Oswald, director of Michigan’s drinking water division.

“We need to know that they have identified the lead service lines before we’re going to fund the removal process,” he said.

SCANDAL AFTER SCANDAL

Lead pipes have caused harm for decades. In recent years, residents in Newark, New Jersey, and Benton Harbor, Michigan, were forced to use bottled water for basic needs like cooking and drinking, after tests revealed elevated levels of lead. Flint, a majority-Black community where officials initially denied there were lead problems, focused national attention on the health crisis. Public trust in tap water fell afterwards, especially in Black and Hispanic communities.


Sri Vedachalam, director of water equity and climate resilience at Environmental Consulting & Technology Inc., said he hopes communities are replacing pipes for residents’ benefit.

“But realistically, if it is to avoid embarrassment, that’s still a win,” he said.


There is some indication that embarrassment has been a motivator. Michigan and New Jersey passed tough measures to combat lead in drinking water, including speeding up the mapping process, after downplaying high lead levels. But things are moving more slowly in some other states like Iowa and Missouri that haven’t experienced similar headline-grabbing crises.


Earlier in August, the EPA instructed communities how to document their pipes. Money will flow according to the needs of each state, Fox said. There is technical assistance available and also easier terms for disadvantaged communities.

Water testing in Hamtramck, a city of nearly 30,000 surrounded by Detroit, has periodically revealed worrisome levels of lead. The city assumes most of its pipes are made of the problem metal and work is underway to replace them.

“We’ve been doing street after street,” said city manager Max Garbarino.

Pipe replacement is so sought after in Michigan that communities have applied for more funds than will be immediately available.

EQUITY CONCERNS


EPA distributed early funds using a formula that doesn’t consider the number of lead pipes in each state. So some states received far more money per lead pipe than others. The agency is working to correct that for future years. Michigan is hopeful that if states don’t spend their money, it will eventually flow to them.

Schwartz of BlueConduit said officials should be sure not to skip pipe inspections in poor neighborhoods, to ensure inventories are accurate. Otherwise if there is better documentation in wealthy areas, they might receive replacement funding more quickly even if they don’t need it as much.

Dubuque, a city of about 58,000 on the Mississippi River, wants more than $48 million to replace roughly 5,500 of its pipes that contain lead. Mapping work started years ago and previous officials ensured that it was properly updated, anticipating it would one day be a federal requirement. They were right.

Christopher Lester, manager of the city’s water department, said those past efforts made applying for funds easy.

“We’re fortunate to have the inventory developed. We don’t need to try and play catch up,” Lester said.

___

The Associated Press receives support from the Walton Family Foundation for coverage of water and environmental policy. The AP is solely responsible for all content. For all of AP’s environmental coverage, visit https://apnews.com/hub/climate-and-environment
Bill Nye: The effects of climate change are so obvious people will come around

Host and producer of the new Peacock program 'The End is Nye,' Bill Nye, joins Morning Joe to discuss global disasters and how to survive and prevent them.

DC attorney general pushes to revive antitrust lawsuit against Amazon

D.C. Attorney General Karl Racine (D) filed a notice of appeal Thursday to revive the antitrust case against Amazon that a judge dismissed earlier this year. 

The lawsuit, first filed in 2021, alleges Amazon has used its position as a giant in the e-commerce field to maximize profits at the expense of consumers, third-party sellers and wholesalers. It accuses Amazon of using anticompetitive practices by keeping third-party sellers from offering lower-cost proxies for products elsewhere.

A judge dismissed the case in March in an oral ruling. 

“We’re appealing the lower court’s decision because District consumers deserve a fair marketplace that promotes competition, innovation, and choice,” Racine said in a statement. “And we’re filing this appeal because the antitrust laws and the facts are on our side—and on the side of District residents. We look forward to making our case before the Court of Appeals.”

The appeal is Racine’s latest attempt to push the first government-led antitrust case against Amazon forward. In April his office filed a motion asking the court to reconsider the ruling. 

The Department of Justice (DOJ) also urged the court to reconsider the decision to dismiss the case. DOJ attorneys wrote in an April filing that if “left uncorrected, the Court’s ruling could jeopardize the enforcement of antitrust law by improperly raising the bar on plaintiffs challenging anticompetitive contractual restraints in the District of Columbia.” 

A spokesperson for Amazon did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The company has previously pushed back on the allegations in the lawsuit. 

GOOD NEWS
US launches new immediate open access policy

By Rachel Magee


Embargoes on free access to publications from federally funded research to be dropped

The US government is introducing a requirement to its open-access policy for all federally funded research results to be made immediately available, in what has been described as a ‘game-changer’ for scholarly publishing.

In a 25 August memorandum, the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) said that, under changes to be implemented by the end of 2025, federally funded research should no longer be published with a 12-month embargo on free open access. The embargo was an option in its previous policy guidance on public access to research.

In the memorandum, Alondra Nelson, a deputy director at OSTP and deputy assistant to the president, said this optional embargo had limited immediate access of federally funded research results to only those who could pay for it or who had access through libraries or other institutions.

“Financial means and privileged access must never be the pre-requisites to realising the benefits of federally funded research that the American public deserves,” Nelson said in the policy guidance document. She added there should be “no delay” between taxpayers and the returns on their investment in research.

Under the new policy guidance, federal agencies that fund R&D have been called on to update or develop new public access plans to ensure all federally funded peer-reviewed publications are made accessible in agency-designated repositories without any embargo or delay after publication.

Policy could ‘level the playing field’

To build on data-sharing measures from the previous policy in 2013, OSTP said data published in peer-reviewed research articles should be made immediately available upon publication.

OSTP said public access to federally funded research data would help “level the playing field across a highly uneven funding landscape between academic disciplines”.

The memorandum to the heads of executive departments and agencies that fund R&D said these updates should happen “as soon as possible” and no later than 31 December 2025.

‘Game changer’

Johan Rooryck, executive director of Coalition S, a group of mainly European funders calling for immediate open access, said the new policy guidance from the US is a “game-changer for scholarly publishing.”

“Such a strong statement, from a country that is leading in many research areas, will greatly advance efforts for global open access“, Rooryck added.

 White House directs health, science agencies to make federally funded studies free to access

The White House on Thursday directed health and science agencies to make federally funded studies immediately available to the public after publication, a move that open-access advocates have long pressed for but one that threatens to upend the business models of scientific journals.

The guidance from the White House’s Office of Science and Technology Policy effectively ushers in a sea change in the publishing industry, which currently places many federally funded research papers behind a paywall for 12 months.

While President Biden — and former President Trump before him — had long pledged to open access to federally funded research, the publishing lobby has argued doing so could spell the demise of scientific journals reliant on significant subscription fees to access embargoed papers.

“It is a transformational document,” said Center for Open Science Director Brian Nosek, a University of Virginia psychologist who helms the progressive open data nonprofit. “This is going to change how it is that science is communicated, and what the public and particularly other researchers have access to in the work that was done.

“The devil’s in the details,” said New England Journal of Medicine Editor-in-Chief Eric Rubin, who told STAT at least a third of the journal’s estimated 200 articles a year are attached to federal funding, though other funding streams do require open access. “It does threaten the model of a carefully thought-out presentation and carefully getting research. We’re gonna have to think about how we can still do what we think is important.”

Scientific organizations argue that the policy shift will primarily hit nonprofit journals and smaller research labs that won’t have the funds to put up article processing charges that can total more than $10,000 for more prominent publications. 

Those processing costs could soar as journals change their revenue models to account for lagging subscriptions, said Michael Stebbins, a former Obama OSTP official and geneticist with Harvard’s Institute for Quantitative Social Science who led an Obama effort to boost public access.

“What you’re going to see is a massive drop in revenue for these scientific societies. That is going to crush some of them,” said Stebbins. “You could wind up creating some inequality within the scientific community in exchange for making the papers much more broadly available.”

However, Stebbins said he largely supports the initiative, particularly the move to make researchers’ data more quickly available in a bid to boost accountability. The challenge, he said, is projecting the federal costs of shifting research journals’ revenue model and creating open data infrastructures.  

“This memo functionally drives agencies to spend money on the development of the policies and infrastructure necessary to implement the data requirements,”  he said. “That’s where the big unknown is here. “

An OSTP spokesperson said the office has conducted dozens of meetings that “included large and small publishers, for-profit and not-for-profit organizations, scholarly societies, libraries and universities, and the general public.” 

“The topics discussed range from public access to open science to scientific integrity,” the spokesperson added.

In announcing the move, OSTP Director Alondra Nelson pointed to the Covid-19 pandemic, saying in a memo to federal agencies that “in the wake of the public health crisis, government, industry, and scientists voluntarily worked together to adopt an immediate public access policy, which yielded powerful results: research and data flowed effectively, new accessible insights super-charged the rate of discovery, and translation of science soared.”

Reports in 2019 that Trump’s science office was considering open access prompted publishing groups and business lobbies led by the American Association of Publishers to argue in a letter that the shift “would effectively nationalize the valuable American intellectual property that we produce and force us to give it away to the rest of the world for free.”

The letter, signed by more than 135 research and disease advocacy groups, made the case that an open-access policy would cost the U.S. government more money because it would need to underwrite increased fees for researchers looking to publish their studies.

On top of that, “it could also result in some scientific societies being forced to close their doors or to no longer be able to support the publication of U.S.-sponsored science that is key to ensuring that the U.S. remains the world leader in science and technology,” AAP and other organizations wrote.

In a statement Thursday, AAP suggested the Biden administration order was akin to “the government mandating business models” and implied it could threaten journals’ “accuracy, quality, and output.”

Some publishers, however, said it was too soon to tell how much the order would impact their business.

“While many early reports are signaling that OSTP’s guidance to federal agencies will substantially impact scientific publishers, we believe it is too soon to tell if this guidance will impact our journals,” Sudip Parikh, CEO of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, and executive publisher of the Science journals, said in a statement.

Biden has called for increased public access for years, citing his longtime priority to eliminate cancers including glioblastoma, which killed his son Beau Biden.

“The taxpayers fund $5 billion a year in cancer research every year … but once it’s published, nearly all of that taxpayer-funded research sits behind walls,” then-Vice President Biden said at a 2016 American Association for Cancer Research event. “Tell me how this is moving the process along more rapidly.”

The Obama administration three years earlier directed federal agencies with more than $100 million in annual research funding to increase public access to those studies but allowed for a yearlong embargo on public access to the studies and accompanying data. Scientific journals often deploy those embargoes to encourage subscriptions.

National Institutes of Health Director Lawrence Tabak, whose sprawling agency directs more than $40 billion in research funding, pledged Thursday to swiftly release plans to execute the new policy.

“We are enthusiastic to move forward on these important efforts to make research results more accessible and look forward to working together to strengthen our shared responsibility in making federally funded research results accessible to the public,” he said in a statement.