Saturday, September 21, 2024

UK

Revealed: PM’s allies help snuff out thorny women’s conference motions on winter fuel, two-child cap and gender


:

Labour women members’ attempts to shape policy on thorny issues including the winter fuel allowance, sex and gender policy and the two-child benefit cap have been frustrated, after supporters of the party leadership lobbied delegates to women’s conference to pick less sensitive topics for debate, LabourList can reveal.

In the lead-up to the party’s annual women’s conference this Saturday in Liverpool, Constituency Labour Parties and affiliated unions and societies had submitted dozens of motions on issues particularly affecting women, which they hoped to see debated, and then sent on for a floor vote at the main conference.

Starmer allies mobilise ahead of conference

The process for women’s conference sees motions whittled down in advance however, first ruled in or out on procedural grounds, and then grouped into subjects. Delegates attending are then also balloted in advance on which subjects should be picked for debate, with three CLP choices and three union choices.

The campaign group Labour to Win, which played a key role in Keir Starmer’s campaign to become party leader, wrote to some delegates hours before the recent vote, urging them to pick three of the 18 subjects motions were filed on this year: women’s health, women in the economy, and education and girls.

An email seen by LabourList told delegates that picking these themes would ensure a “wide range of topics are discussed, while remaining committed to the Labour Party’s priorities, supporting Keir Starmer, Angela Raynor and the Cabinet to build the best possible Britain for women and girls”.

Further party correspondence seen by LabourList suggests delegates then did vote to approve these three subjects in the ballot, alongside three union-backed themes: violence against women and girls in the workplace, women in the workplace, and women as working parents and carers.

The decision means motions which fell into a string of other categories will not be voted on: antisocial behaviour, border security command, child poverty, domestic and sexual abuse, female genital mutilation, Great British Energy, social care, tackling hate, the Equality Act, trans rights, women and pensions, and women in Palestine.

Some of the motions would likely have sparked controversy, and the avoidance of votes is likely to come as a relief to senior figures as Labour prepares for one of its most high-profile, heavily scrutinised conferences in years with the party now in government. Some emergency motions on thornier topics could still emerge, however.

Winter fuel protest motion rejected

One motion by members in Shrewsbury, calling on the party to either retain winter fuel payments as a universal benefit or significant increase the threshold for pension credit, will therefore not make the cut, as it fell into the rejected ‘Great British Energy’ category.

The motion had warned: “Means testing the winter fuel payment is a regressive move which will hit the most vulnerable hardest, and women in particular”, causing “severe hardship” to those who rely on their state pension.

Two-child cap not on the agenda

Four CLPs had filed motions on the two-child benefit cap, with Labour’s refusal to ditch it to date sparking ongoing controversy within the party.

But all fell into the rejected ‘child poverty’ category, which included motions backed by campaign groups Campaign for Labour Party Democracy and Labour Women’s Declaration, but which not enough delegates voted for it to make it to the conference floor.

Poole CLP had said in their motion: “Key to addressing the scandal of child poverty will be the removal of the iniquitous two child benefits cap and we call on the Labour government to make this change as a matter of urgency.”

Mid Bedfordshire, Halifax and Erith and Thamesmead CLPs had filed similar motions warning: “Labour cannot achieve its objective of reducing child poverty without scrapping the two-child limit…It’s immoral to treat some children as less deserving than others because of the circumstances of their birth.

“Women’s Conference calls upon the Labour government to abolish the two-child limit as soon as possible as an urgent priority.”

No motions on trans rights

Meanwhile one Equality Act motion that will not make the cut was a Glasgow Cathart submission which called for the party to “commit to a tightening of the definition of ‘women’ in the Equality Act to mean biological women only”, and to oppose any reform of gender recognition across the UK or Scotland.

Another unsuccessful motion from North Shropshire CLP had Labour to “acknowledge the principle of women’s sex-based rights and clarify ‘sex’ in law means ‘biological sex’.”

A further motion by Manchester Central CLP had urged the party to stick to a manifesto pledge on reforming gender recognition law, deliver a trans-inclusive ban on conversion therapy and make hate crime motivated by sexual orientation and transgender identity aggravated offences.

Palestine motion also doesn’t get through

The ‘women in Palestine’ category also failed to make the floor, though only one approved morion was filed under the header, and the motion did not appear to go far beyond current party policy.

Tamworth CLP had called for an immediate ceasefire, unimpeded aid into Gaza, the recognitino of Palestine as part of a renewed peace process, and Labour playing a “full diplomatic role” securing a deal and peace process.

Labour was not immediately available for comment.

Anger as women’s conference assigned only 20 minutes to debate each motion



Labour women members have voiced their anger at only having around 20 minutes to debate each policy motion at the women’s conference tomorrow, after the party further scaled back the annual event.

Only six motions will be debated at the women’s conference, taking place the day before events for the national conference kick off in Liverpool, with the amount of time for debate on policy motions cut from three hours last year to just two.

It comes a year after the conference was controversially cut from two days down to one.

Rachel Garnham, co-chair of the Campaign for Labour Party Democracy (CLPD) and a former Labour national executive committee member, told LabourList: “CLPD has been disappointed to see the further diminishing of women’s voices in the Labour Party with a smaller, deprioritised, top-down women’s conference this year.

“20 minutes for discussion on crucial topics is an insult.

“Grassroots women members and trade unions bring a valuable perspective that Labour in government need to listen to in order to deliver the change women need.

“CLPD continues to call for a two-day, policy-making spring women’s conference where women’s voices can genuinely be heard.”

A video filmed by one delegate comparing the level of information about its women’s and its main conference has been circulating among frustrated women members.

Sammy Wentworth, a delegate from Bexleyheath and Crayford CLP, said it “sickens me” after filming herself flicking through the long main programme, comparing it to the single A4 sheet she has about the women’s event.

A recent CLPD email to its members urged delegates to vote for three candidates at the conference to the Women’s Conference Arrangements Committee (CAC) who back the restoration of a standalone two-day policy-making conference that is separate from annual conference, as well as for an agenda “that includes as much input from grassroots women members and trade unionists as possible.”

Jean Crocker of CLPD, one of the candidates for the Women’s CAC election, said: “At the two-day women’s conferences, we had eight motion debates. When we were cut to one day in 2023, there was pressure to have only four – but we held firm on six, which increased the number of grassroots CLP voices heard, and the same has happened in 2024.

“We are calling for a return to a two-day standalone women’s conference in 2025.”

Two other candidates, Louise Irvine and Lynne Troughton, backed by the gender-critical group Labour Women’s Declaration, also expressed their commitment to fighting to restore the two-day conference.

They said: Labour’s rulebook commits to an effective National Women’s Committee to leading on political policy work with women. Previously it was held as a two day policy-making conference in the spring, at a different time of year from Labour’s Annual Conference. In standing for the WCAC, we would campaign to re-establish this.

“We feel the 2023 and 2024 one day autumn events, offer very limited time for policy discussion, and do not do justice to the political contribution women members are entitled to make.”

Teresa Gray, women’s officer in Bexley and Sidcup CLP, said she was “appalled” by the cuts to the conference and said: “Conference appears to have lost its role in shaping policies for women.”

She said that the reduction to just one day last year “diminished the status of the conference” and claimed motions chosen in advance “seemed carefully chosen not so much to support debate as consensus”.

One CLP officer, who wished to remain anonymous, said: “I have been a long-time Starmer supporter.

“Two hours to discuss six motions plus emergency motions is derisory. Come on Labour. Women matter.”

The Labour Party was approached for comment.

THEY DON'T

‘Women at the table – why Labour women’s voices matter’


Photo: UK Government

Labour women from across the country will arrive in Liverpool tomorrow to make sure women’s voices are heard, in a party transformed, for the Annual National Women’s Conference.

There are currently 187 Labour women MPs in Parliament (46% of the Parliamentary Labour Party) making up 263 women MPs in total in the House of Commons. They bring hope for change not only within Parliament but for the work of government to create a more equal and prosperous country.

This is what so many women before have done, such as the 101 Labour women elected to Parliament in 1997 under the last Labour government, introducing swathes of reforms such as the National Minimum Wage, children’s centres, maternity and paternity pay, increased support for carers of elderly and disabled relatives, the right to request flexible working and a minimum income guarantee for pensioners. The list could go on!

‘Progress is not inevitable. We have to work together for it.’

This progress was reversed in many ways under 14 years of a Conservative government, starving local councils of funding, children’s centres cut back, tax credits cut, and support for victims of domestic violence reduced with women waiting years to see a conviction when reporting a crime such as rape, as highlighted by Dame Vera Baird when she was the Victims Commissioner for England and Wales saying in her annual 2021/22 report that ‘for victims, reporting rape is effectively a lottery and the odds are rarely in your favour.’

Yesterday, Rachel Reeves, Britain’s first woman Chancellor of the Exchequer confirmed her commitment to “improve life for women” wanting to close the gender pay gap, strengthen rights at work and invest in childcare too.

Progress is not inevitable. We have to work together for it. There is so much to learn and to celebrate which is why the women’s conference is an important space for Labour women to come together from across the country every year.

It provides an opportunity to share our experiences, ideas and have discussions to help shape the way ahead. Change can never happen with one Prime Minister or one Minister working alone and certainly not without women in the room.

This is a time to ensure the women’s conference is as inclusive as possible so that we can support the government to deliver change. Not just this year, but in future years, and many of us stand ready to support the party in evolving this conference.

There can be space for more people to attend and opportunities for us to hear from sisters in other progressive parties around the world. We do need to work from, as the Foreign Secretary David Lammy describes, “progressive realism” but this realism for many women is fuelled by a desire for change to make our party stronger and our country more prosperous for all.

‘I hope we can build a conference that gives space for motions to be debated’

Labour is often criticised for never having a woman Leader yet and yes, this is disappointing – not forgetting Dame Margaret Beckett and Harriet Harman stepping up for a time – but the Labour Party is one that has delivered progress for women. And this new government has more women serving in it than ever before, determined to work together to deliver what we have promised.

I have listened to party members talk about wanting to build on the women’s conference successes of the past. We can. I hope we can build a conference for the future that gives space for more motions to be debated, hear from more of our National Policy Forum representatives to be able to shape the policy agenda for the future together and hear from other underrepresented groups so that we can make the changes needed from listening to their lived experiences.

Whether it’s better access to transport and healthcare or quality housing and social care, there is so much change which needs to happen and has already begun. The experiences of women affects the success of our society as a whole and this is why we must work together to get this right.

‘I am inspired by the women serving our country in government’

Labour women in the party and in government will once more deliver the transformational change our country needs. We are only a few weeks into this new government and already I am inspired by the energy, determination and vision of those who serve our country, appointed by our Prime Minister.

Dame Diana Johnson tackling policing and crime prevention following rigorous scrutiny of government chairing the Home Affairs Select Committee, Jess Phillips using her years of experience in domestic abuse services to ensure we halve violence against women and girls, Sarah Jones working across two major government departments on the decarbonisation agenda with industry, Catherine McKinnell co-producing school reforms with our wonderful teachers and Rushanara Ali leading on improving the quality of our housing stock. There are so many other examples.

The national women’s conference is an important time for women to come together to help shape the change that’s needed for our country and I look forward to playing my part as a member of the Labour Party to ensure it continues to be a success in the future.

Following a landslide victory we all worked so hard for to return politics to public service and bring hope back to working people, change has begun.

Labour conference


‘Why we can’t count on North Sea oil and gas – and need a green energy transition’


Credit: Sean Aidan Calderbank/Shutterstock.com

What a difference a general election makes.

Within days of Labour’s historic victory at the polls, the new Energy Secretary Ed Miliband was standing before the House of Commons to announce the steps that the government will take to make the UK a clean energy superpower.

Labour’s ambitious agenda  underscores the seriousness with which it intends to approach the energy crisis – from lifting the ban on new onshore wind projects and approving three new major solar farms, to  publishing a more ambitious solar roadmap.

The creation of GB Energy, a new publicly owned energy generator, will drive investment in new renewables and support a just transition for workers in fossil fuel industries. The government is also taking the decisive step of putting an end to new oil and gas licenses in the North Sea. This is a clear statement of intent: once again, the UK is ready to be a world leader in meeting the challenge of climate breakdown.

But there has been some confusion and misunderstanding, particularly regarding our plans for the future of the North Sea. So, let’s clear things up.

New oil and gas production won’t cut energy costs

In 2022, the Russian invasion of Ukraine sent gas and oil prices soaring. British households were hit harder by rising energy costs than any country in western Europe, with the impact being felt in every corner of the country, including in my own constituency of Sheffield Hallam.

Even today, the average energy bill is £400 higher than it was in 2021. Some have called for more domestic oil and gas production to shield the UK from future price hikes, but that’s not a solution. The price of gas is largely set by the international market with North Sea production too low to make any meaningful impact to global prices.

That meant that in 2022, UK customers’ bills continued to rise even as domestic production of gas increased by 17%.

READ MORE: Labour Party Conference 2024: The full LabourList events programme, from karaoke to key panel debates

With energy bills set to rise again this winter, the only sure way to avoid future crises is to reduce our reliance on gas and oil. That means insulating homes and installing electric heat pumps, powered by renewable sources like offshore wind which generate power at a fixed rate unlike gas power plants. A typical household that made just two key net zero improvements – replacing its gas boiler with an electric heat pump and improving its energy efficiency (to at least Energy Performance Certificate Band C) would have saved £365 on its energy bills in 2022 and £565 in 2023.

We’re already counting the costs of a lost decade for sensible, pragmatic policy, with energy costs for UK households having been £70 billion higher from the early 2010s to 2023 due to the slow roll-out of net zero improvements.

North Sea gas and oil are running out

The North Sea isn’t the limitless resource some seem to think it is. The North Sea Transition Authority, which is responsible for managing the North Sea oil and gas fields, has estimated that production of gas is likely to decline by 55% by the end of the decade and oil by 40%.

That’s even if we were to issue new licences. But too many politicians still refuse to recognise this reality – with as many as 25% of Conservative MPs in the last Parliament refusing to believe the NSTA’s findings. We need to face the facts  and deal with the world as it is.

When it comes to energy independence and the quantum of homegrown energy we generate in the next few years, the simple truth is renewable energy is the main show in town. Just one large offshore windfarm would generate as much electricity as the gas that might have come from new drilling of the North Sea floor.

Unless we’re able to massively reduce our dependence on oil and gas this decade, the UK will become ever more dependent on foreign energy – and more vulnerable to the volatility of international fossil fuel markets.

New licences won’t deliver the long-term security workers deserve

I understand the concerns that a halt to future oil and gas licenses will hit jobs in the sector. But we can’t pretend that continuing with business as usual will deliver the long-term economic security that these communities deserve.

Over the past decade, even as new licences have been issued, the number of jobs supported by the oil and gas industry has more than halved from 440,000 to 215,000. North Sea gas and oil is running out – and workers risk falling off a cliff-edge unless we urgently accelerate the deployment of new renewables.

The choice is between a plan to ease the transition and create new opportunities for these workers, or passively watching on as production runs down while jobs continue to disappear.

But there is hope. Industry experts estimate that 90% of all oil and gas workers have skills that can readily be redeployed to new offshore jobs in renewable energy. With the right training, support, and investment, we can guarantee the futures of oil and gas communities across the UK by ramping up renewables for the long term – exactly what Labour has promised to do.

This won’t be an easy transition. But it’s a necessary one if jobs are going to be preserved. Labour’s promise to at last deliver a skills passport, helping workers to more easily move from oil and gas to the renewables sector is just one example of a step in the right direction.

It’s time to lay the foundations of a fossil free future

Oil and gas workers deserve a just transition that protects their livelihoods. It is crucial that their voices and that of trade unions, are actively included in shaping and planning this transition.

And households across Britain – too many of which found themselves struggling to pay the bills under the last Tory government – need to see robust action to ensure that no one is ever forced to choose between heating their homes and putting food on the table again. But as we approach this important debate, it’s important that we’re guided by facts and evidence.

And the evidence is clear – switching to a focus on renewables will create jobs, enhance energy security and set an example to the rest of the world in addressing the climate crisis.

(TNT: TOMMOROWS NEWS TODAY)


UK

SHA motions at Labour Party Conference

By the Socialist Health Association

SEPT. 20, 2024

The Socialist Health Association has submitted two motions to the Conference Arrangements Committee (CAC). The first is a contemporary motion on physician associates (Replacing Qualified Doctors – A Threat to Patient Safety). The second is an emergency motion (Act Now to Ease NHS Winter Pressures) on NHS pay and conditions.

Physician associates

Physician associates (PAs) and other ‘medical substitutes’ were originally introduced in the US in the 1980s to cut costs by employing cheaper, less skilled staff to carry out specific medical procedures, thereby freeing up expensive medical staff to carry out the most complex aspects of their work. They did jobs like sewing up surgical incisions or putting up drips.

Delegating some medical tasks is accepted and established here – for example phlebotomists who only take blood. However, in the last 20 years there has been an enormous growth of medical assistants such as physician associates, anaesthesia associates and surgical care practitioners. They are science graduates with a two-year postgraduate training qualification. While the intention is that they should always act under medical supervision, it has recently become apparent that this is often not the case. There have been particular problems in general practice, where the Tory government offered GPs incentives to employ PAs under a scheme whereby they were supplied to GP practices at no cost.

This led to a large expansion in the numbers of PAs in primary care, especially in poorer areas that find it harder to attract qualified doctors. In recent years there have been examples of avoidable deaths and other medical harm caused by PAs working beyond their competence and without adequate supervision. There has also been major disruption to the training of junior doctors as a result of PAs being given priority.

Many of the medical royal colleges, as well as the British Medical Association, have carried out surveys and asked the Tory and Labour governments to take urgent action in the face of a rapidly developing two tier health service.

That is also the aim of the SHA motion, which calls for an immediate freeze in the recruitment of these staff and the courses that train them, followed by a phased elimination of these roles from the NHS. In order to support this, the government should undertake an urgent review of the regulation, training and practice of PAs. Following the above, these staff should be retitled medical assistants and employed only in defined, restricted and properly supervised work.

 However, it now seems that the SHA motion may not reach the Conference floor. The CAC has placed the motion in a group called Patient Safety; as this group does not include many of the major NHS issues it is unlikely to get through Sunday’s priorities ballot. The SHA appealed against its categorisation but the appeal was rejected.

NHS pay and conditions

The text of our emergency motion speaks for itself: Act now to ease NHS winter pressures. Here is the short motion in full.

Conference notes that on the 16th September the British Medical Association Junior Doctors’ Committee accepted the government’s pay offer, thereby ending their long-running industrial action. We also note the recent result of the Unite ballot to accept the latest pay offer.

We welcome this first step towards full pay restoration for junior doctors. This should be fully funded but not at the expense of already insufficient NHS reserves. Salaries for essential workers such as these should never again be allowed to fall below inflation.

However, the NHS continues to face an unprecedented staffing crisis, across all cadres of its workforce. This pay award alone will not solve this. On the eve of another difficult winter, and with waiting lists at a record high, a comprehensive plan to drastically improve recruitment and retention of NHS staff is urgently needed.

Conference urges the government to take all necessary steps, including prioritising the necessary funding, to safeguard our NHS staff and patients this winter.

Prospects for our NHS

Emergency motions must be restricted to a single theme. If our motion is accepted for debate, there is much more to be said about the government’s management of the NHS. Most obvious is the need to challenge its commitment to sustaining the privatisation and Americanisation which we have lived with for the last 25 years. What needs to be understood is that physician associates are not in any sense an isolated project, designed to improve NHS efficiency. They are a systematic element of the ‘new care models’ imported from the US by NHS England and designed not to enhance but to undermine the NHS.

Replacing doctors with these underqualified staff in insurance-friendly community ‘hubs’ is part of the plan developed over the last ten years and legislated by the 2022 Health and Care Act, to undermine the traditional pattern of GPs and District General Hospitals.

Every Conference from 2016-22 voted to reinstate a comprehensive, publicly provided NHS (in 2023 the CAC instituted its policy of splitting up NHS motions in order to make it more difficult for them to succeed in the priorities ballot). Sadly, there was little if any response to these Conference motions from the then shadow front bench. Hopefully the need to reinstate a fully comprehensive, universal, publicly provided NHS in England will emerge in this year’s conference debate.

Please ask your CLP, union and affiliate delegates to vote for Patient Safety in the Priorities Ballot.

UK

Andrew Fisher: the man behind For the Many Not the Few

SEPTEMBER 20, 2024

In it’s first birthday, the Labour Left Podcast, produced in association with Labour Hub, interviewed Andrew Fisher, the man behind the iconic 2017 Labour ManifestoHere is the You Tube link.

The interview begins by exploring the inside story behind For the Many Not the Few – the manifesto that Keir Starmer called our foundational document.”  Andrew reveals to us how he ended up writing the manifesto, what was in his mind when he wrote it and the moment when the Labour right leaked it.

In the second half of the interview, we move onto Starmer for some fascinating insights into what makes the man tick.  Find out why Starmer popped into Jeremy Corbyn’s leader’s office while Owen Smith’s attempted leadership coup was still in full swing. What did he want?  Andrew sat alongside Starmer during the Brexit negotiations with Prime Minister May. What was Starmer like as a lead negotiator?

Later we discuss the Oliver Eagleton thesis that there was always a Project Starmer.  We explore to what extent was Eagleton right about the project with the recollections of an insider who saw it all.

Moving on, we look at Reevonomics.  Drawing upon Andrew’s excellent book, The Failed Experiment, to help us define neo-liberalism, we consider to what extent Rachel Reeves is planning to depart from the economic orthodoxy.  Is the Macro Dose, left economics podcaster, James Meadway on the right track when he says Labour Will End Neoliberalism, Just Not in a Good Way?

As we approach the latter stages of the interview, we dissect the prospects for a Labour left revival, the future of the Campaign Groups Magnificent Seven and the role of the soft left.  Andrew has some thoughts and advice for left MPs and trade union leaders on how they might help hasten the arrival of a much-needed comeback.

Finally, Andrew reveals who he wants to put in the Labour Left Podcast Class Hero Hall of Fame.  I think the readers of Labour Hub will approve of his choice.

If you enjoy the Labour Left Podcast 2024 conference special, please have a look at the whole year back catalogue.  Previous episodes have included historian Corinne Fowler, talking about her book Our Island Stories: Country Walks Through Colonial Britain;  Jeremy Gilbert, Professor of Cultural and Political Theory, talking about Thatcherism; Mike Jackson, co-founder of Lesbians and Gays Support the Miners, on the 1984-85 Miners’ Strike; political activist Liz Davies telling her story as the dissenter within New Labour; Rachel Garnham, a current co-Chair of the Campaign for Labour Party Democracy looking back at the history of the fight for Labour democracy; and finally myself telling the story of Brighton Labour Briefing, a local Labour left magazine in the early 1980s.

If you are enjoying the podcast please subscribe on YouTube or your favourite podcast platform so you never miss a future episode.  If you like what the Labour Left Podcast is trying to achieve, please help us to get the podcast in front of  more people by sharing, following, rating and commenting on every episode you watch.

You can watch the podcast on YouTube, Apple podcasts here, Audible here and listen to it on Spotify here  If your favourite podcast site isn’t listed, just search for the Labour Left Podcast

Bryn Griffiths is the host of Labour Hub’s spin off the Labour Left Podcast.  He is an activist in the labour movement, Momentum and The World Transformed in North Essex. You can find all the episodes of the Labour left Podcast here  or if you prefer audio platforms (for example, Amazon, Audible Spotify, Apple etc,) just search for Labour Left Podcast.

U$A

Amazon Drivers in Queens Go Public with Union Fight



Hundreds of delivery drivers based out of DBK4, a warehouse in Maspeth, Queens, delivered union authorization cards to Amazon management on Monday. They are demanding that Amazon recognize their move to join the Teamsters union, and that the company meet them at the bargaining table. This comes in the midst of organizing escalations by Amazon drivers and warehouse workers across the country.


Pola Posen 
September 17, 2024
LEFT VOICE



On Monday morning, hundreds of Amazon delivery drivers in Maspeth, Queens, marched on management with signed union authorization cards. The cards represent proof that a majority of drivers — who are contracted to work for Amazon through three “delivery service partners” (DSP) — support joining the Teamsters union. “We are a union!” the drivers chanted.

Drivers are fighting for higher wages, better working conditions, and against overwhelming routes with excessive packages. As a driver said on Monday to their managers: “these routes are inhumane.” They are joining the fight to have a union and they want to be recognized as what they are: Amazon workers.

The struggle for Amazon driver recognition has accelerated since last April, when drivers at a DSP in Palmdale, California voted to unionize. Because the drivers were considered employees of the DSP rather than of Amazon, Amazon simply cut the contract with the DSP rather than recognizing the drivers.

In response, the Teamsters union brought the case to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), arguing that Amazon is a joint employer of the drivers. The NLRB affirmed this argument in August, laying the groundwork for Amazon drivers’ legal legitimacy in bargaining with the company. Earlier this month, drivers in Atlanta, Georgia also won recognition from the NLRB that Amazon is their joint employer.

Drivers pick up the packages at Amazon facilities, drive vans with the Amazon logo, and use Amazon devices to track the packages. Not recognizing drivers as Amazon workers is open labor fraud. Amazon tries to cut every corner to advance in the flexibilization and precarization of work. It’s also a tool to divide workers and make unionization harder.

You may be interested in: Amazon Labor Union Affiliates With Teamsters: What Does This Mean for Amazon Workers and the Labor Movement?

Amazon is scared. Last Thursday, threatened by the drivers’ fights for unionization, Amazon announced that it would be raising its delivery driver wages by 7%, bumping drivers up to around $22/hour. We saw a similar move from the company this summer in the UK, when Amazon gave warehouse workers a 10 percent raise after successfully union-busting an organizing campaign by a 3,000-worker warehouse outside of Coventry. These raises are an attempt from the company to try to satiate its employees — “you don’t need a union because we give you raises!” But these raises only show Amazon’s desperation. If we can win wage increases through wielding only the whispered threats of our power, it is clear that when we are unified, there is no ceiling to what we can fight for.

It is critical that Amazon workers realize the collective power of warehouse workers and delivery drivers combined. Although the jobs of drivers and inside workers are quite different, no package can be delivered without the labor of both. The behemoth that disciplines our lives is the same. So, drivers must fight for warehouse workers, and warehouse workers must fight for drivers, because our fight is one and the same. Together, organized democratically and from the rank-and-file, we can build the workers’ power necessary to defeat Amazon.

Solidarity with Amazon delivery drivers in Queens who made a stride for the entire movement!