Hot Air Over Climate Change--Business as Usual

Guess who is not sitting at the Climate Change Conference table in Montreal? Those most impacted by the decisions of course. In this case first nations peoples of the Arctic North like the Inuit. Inuits Transformed by Global Warming

Guess who is sitting at the table?

Why the corporate bosses of the petroleum industry. Regional, not global, carbon cuts most likely - BP Like the President/CEO of British Petroleum, now branded BP with groovey TV ads about being environmentally aware. And prepared to profit from new technologies and alternative energy. BP to build world's biggest alternative power business

And of course politicians who have failed to either accept Kyoto or have like Canada's Liberals failed to fulfill their Kyoto commitments.Political turmoil on eve of Canada's climate forum / Host country struggles to meet Kyoto pledge

Not that that Kyoto was anything but a sop for capitalism anyways. It was all about making Capitalism Green. Alcan funds planting of 100,000 trees in project to keep Montreal Climate Change Conference carbon neutral Carbon sinks and carbon credits, exchanges of credits between polluting industries and countries with trees. Greenpeace says rich countries export climate change But Kyoto and this conference, dubbed Kyoto2, will NOT change anything because frankly Capitalism Is NOT Sustainable.

And hey I am not the only on to say that the Montreal Conference will do little to change capitalism. So does the influential Policy Think Tank of the Executive branch of Capitalism, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) in the United States. And they set the agenda for the most powerful capitalist country in the world.

David G. Victor, a Council adjunct senior fellow for science and technology and director of the Program on Energy and Sustainable Development at Stanford University, spoke to cfr.org's Esther Pan on November 23 about what to expect from the Montreal Conference.

What you expect to come out of the climate change conference in Montreal?

Mostly nothing.

And until the fact that climate change is the direct result of capitalism is realized the protestors who want something done about climate change will be gain nothing but more hot air from Conferences like those in Montreal. The protocols will be all about alternatives to keep capitalism functoning with business as usual, CLIMATE CHANGE: Blair Hopes for New Nuclear Programme

While the very real impact of capitalism on climate change continues on an expotential curve that increases its impact on our lives every day.

Health effects of climate change felt worldwide

Many farmers see climate change as threat

Capitalism is in a period of what the communist left calls decadence or as economist Joseph Shumpeter joyfully called it Creative Destruction.

"Can capitalism survive? No. I do not think it can." Thus opens Schumpeter's prologue to a section of his 1942 book, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. One might think, on the basis of the quote, that Schumpeter was a Marxist. But the analysis that led Schumpeter to his conclusion differed totally from Karl Marx's. Schumpeter believed that capitalism would be destroyed by its successes.Innovation by the entrepreneur, argued Schumpeter, led to gales of "creative destruction" as innovations caused old inventories, ideas, technologies, skills, and equipment to become obsolete. The question, as Schumpeter saw it, was not "how capitalism administers existing structures,... [but] how it creates and destroys them." This creative destruction, he believed, caused continuous progress and improved standards of living for everyone.

That means that as we produce more and more goods, and expand the technological capablities of society we also end up destroying more of our world not to improve the living standards for everyone, but for the few in the industrialized nations. And while capitalisms ability to create a technology of rational distributive good its fails to do so because it is dominated by the need to make profits. Where Schumpeter left his analysis the decadence theory of capitalism picks up and says that the contradiction as Marx points out is that advanced capitalism actually holds back technological or other creative solutions to problems, like Climate Change, because it needs to make a profit whether it be through mass layoffs, wars, famines, or environmental destruction. So while it is creative it is ultimately destructive, a suicidal system.This is the reality of Creative Destruction or the decadence of Capitalism. And it is having a world wide impact. Focus: So, are we going to freeze or fry?

The real domination of capital, technology-driven mass production, became prevalent only in the 20^th century (and continues its development to this day). The moment at which the progress of real domination fundamentally changed the conditions of accumulation for global capital is hard to pinpoint. But it is certain that such a change took place, whichever term is used to describe it, that massive devalorization became an intrinsic part of the accumulation process, that therefore the continuation of capitalism imposed on society increasingly brutal violence and self-destruction and thus placed before the working class the need to fight, not to improve its conditions of exploitation within capitalism, but to overthrow it. That’s why we consider 1914 as the starting date of capitalist decadence. In the remaining part of the century, war would make more casualties than in the entire preceding human history. It is true that amidst this endemic destruction, capitalism continued to develop and to grow, that real domination continued to deepen and spread, and that the resulting technification continued to stimulate productivity and thus also the quantity and quality of use-values, even for the working class. Those who think that the conditions for revolution require the irreversible stagnation of capitalism and abject poverty for the vast majority of the working class will wait forever. They have not understood that an irreversibly stagnating capitalism is an oxymoron, that crisis and productivity growth do not exclude each other, that capital seeks higher productivity to fight its crisis, yet worsens it this way, that the struggle of the working class is not one of variable capital reacting only against its own demobilization but of the part of humanity which, because of its place in the production process, is most capable both of recognizing the mortal danger that capitalism represents for humanity and of eliminating it.
THE GENESIS OF CAPITALIST DECADENCE

Johnny B Good

I know I have been slagging John Bowman who does the CBC Election Blog, here and here and we have been having it out in the comments, with irreverance and at least a friendly sense of humour about my criticisms of his blog. And to give the guy credit, his latest blog on CBC covers all the bases about the party blogs and includes the BQ and the Greens. And while I have complained about him giving the Conservatives too much coverage this time around he says it like it is, their weblog sucks, warmed over press releases.The guy listens and responds. So this is a way of saying good on ya Johnny boy. And I am still waiting for your take on the babble dust up.

A Profitable Economics Debate

I want to thank Reg for his comments here . Where we had a short spat back and forth. We are actually having a great ongoing debate on real life economics, here. The wiff and woof of daily life as Canadian workers trying to make ends meet.

Now this is rather unique cause Reg is a Blogging Tory, and you all know what I think of them, and yet we are able to have a civil discussion, and an interesting one at that,over one of the hot button issues that supposedly divides us politically; economics. And we agree, stranger still.

Until you note that this is a Libertarian blog, and one of the principals of libertarianism is to debate between the left and right since we share several common values arising from classical liberalism;distrust of the state, belief in self government, respect for the individual, and a sense of social responsibility. Don't believe me, then check out Kevin Carsons libertarian blog.

Anyways I see Reg has been kind enough to link Le Revue Gauche as a daily read on his website links. I am honoured. Especially when right whingnuts attack the left with comments like 'we are evil' or don't get it when it comes to economics. Such as this comment which was left in response to my article Housing Bubble, Debt Boom

galbraith said...Could you possibly be more economically illiterate? Money not flowing to your beloved social bureaucracies in taxes immediately becomes part of capital markets, providing lower interest rates. But I wouldn't expect the Marxists in your public education schooling to have let you in on that fact. They're too busy trashing the very companies that their own retirement funds are invested in.

This comment is particularly ironic considering most of the data in the article is from such respected capitalist publications as the Financial Post and the Report on Business, as well as clippings from other MSM sources. Facts they call them. And I am accused of being economically illiterate. Because my analysis is based on an understanding of Marxist economics.

Thats the other irony of bveing called economically illiterate, my article Social Insecurity The Phony Pension Plan Crisis has been published online, by autonomist marxists, who also publish right wing economists as well as left wing ones. I think in general the Libertarian Left and the Autonomous Marxist movement has a higher level of tolerance for this kind of debate than the Neo-Cons do.

When Reg first commented here I was expecting another galbraith, since I checked his site and found he was a Blogging Tory. And while we initailly disagreed and still do on Labour Sponsored Investment Funds, he took up the challenge, made good points and we have been having a great dialouge ever since.

Now for those of you that believe that there are two solitudes between the Left and Right...these are the solitudes of dogma. Reg and I will continue our economic debates, or not, but we welcome your contributions. I think its interesting that both of us agree that the basic economic issue in Canada is NOT tax cuts, but capital invesgtment or the lack of it.

For background here are my articles on the economics of daily life and I look forward to your comments Reg.

Jobs Not Tax Cuts

More Income Trust Fallout

Air Canada Profits From Bankruptcy

State Capitalism By Any Other Name

What's good for GM is bad for Workers

Canada's Billion Dollar Rip Off

It's the Labour Theory of Value, stupid

Corporate Canada Plays Hide the Sausage

Corporate Canada is in the Money

We Need a Living Wage
NEO LIBERALISM A FAILURE IN CANADA

Social Insecurity Appendix

Smilin Jack for PM

If Canadians could vote for PM seperate from their MP, Jack would end up smilin as our new PM . Jack is the most popular party leader in English Canada, as all the polls for the past year say including this one today;
Jack Layton: 58 per cent favourable; 42 per cent unfavourable; for a net of +16 (two point drop in the past month).

Whats The Buzz?

Apostles;
What's the buzz
Tell me what's a-happening
Jesus Christ Superstar


Well Buzz Hargrove is at it again, with his own politics of Stratgic Voting. This morning he was interviewed on CBC and was supporting the NDP. This afternoon he introduced Paul Martin to CAW delegates and was supporting the NDP in a Liberal Minority Government. His whole fixation is anybody but Harper. Which means as Buzz puts it a Liberal Minority Government and a strong NDP opposition. Now this could be dismissed as RealPolitick, since Buzz is concerned about Southern Ontario and his Autoworkers.

Union head praises Martin

Liberal Leader Paul Martin tried to poach some union votes Friday -- and received a limited endorsement.

Buzz Hargrove, president of the Canadian Auto Workers Union, gave Mr. Martin a warm introduction to his union's leadership conference in Toronto and told reporters afterwards he wants the Liberal leader to remain prime minister after the Jan. 23 election.

The "extreme right-wing" Conservatives need to be kept from winning at all costs, Mr. Hargrove said.

Thus, union members might need to "vote strategically" in ridings where the NDP candidate is a distant third but the Liberals could win with union support, Mr. Hargrove said.

"We want a clear minority government, led by Paul Martin, with as many New Democrats holding the balance of power as possible."

The ideal political outcome, Mr. Hargrove continued, would be a minority Liberal government with the Liberals and NDP coming together to form a "stable coalition or sign an accord" to work together.

"That's in the best interest of Canada," Mr. Hargrove told reporters.

Mr. Hargrove, whose union has been a major financial supporter of the NDP over the years, has also been a bit of a loose cannon.

Asked if he had discussed the strategic voting idea with NDP Leader Jack Layton, Mr. Hargrove snapped: "No. I don't work for Jack."

But the CAW is more than just autoworkers now its a Canada wide union, one which also has ties with other unions like the Alberta Union of Public Employees, rogue unions that do not belong to the House of Labour the CLC and its Provincial Labour Federations. And Dan McLellan charismatic leader of AUPE is a died in the wool Liberal, as I blogged here he was being considered as a candidate in Edmonton for the Federal Liberals but turned them down. Instead he will be throwing his union weight behind Landslide Anne. Dan spoke at the CAW annual gathering and Buzz spoke in Edmonton at the AUPE convention. This little love affair has been going on since the CAW was suspended from the CLC for raiding the same time AUPE was. CAW raided SEIU, AUPE was raiding CUPE. AUPE supported the CAW. Buzz rejoined the House of Labour, and advocated for Dan. Dan saw more money coming into AUPE's coffers and not wanting to share it with the rest of the Labour movement stayed out of the CLC and its affiliates. AUPE is the largest Independent union in Alberta if not Western Canada.

What's the buzz
Tell me what's a-happening

Nor is the Strategic Voting concept new to Buzz he did it last election too. He started his political manouvers after the Provincial NDP government of Bob Ray attacked the unions with its social contract.

Internally it coincided with a rogue local in Oshawa, hmmm thats where all the job losses are now occuring, that revolted against the CAW/NDP alliance and supported the Reform Party. And went further demanding political freedom in the CAW to support the party of their choice. Note to those that are politically naive, Freedom of Choice is a Right Wing Slogan, as is We Are Not Political, We Are Non Paritisan. Wait a few minutes and the right wing will soon appear as being behind these slogans.

The debacle of the 1990-95 Ontario NDP government, opened up a serious rift between the NDP and the trade union bureaucracy, and in the 1995 election many unions chose to withhold aid, or at least downplay their support for the party. Currently the NDP hovers around 11% in the polls and few outside of some wildly optimistic party loyalists believe the party will improve on its 1995 showing. Hargrove then is caught in a bind. On the one hand he desperately wants to see Harris defeated, rightly describing his government as a disaster for working people; however, he has not forgiven the NDP (nor, for that matter, has the NDP asked for forgiveness!). No attempt is made to even conceal the contempt and loathing felt for the arrogant and intellectual Bob Rae in Labour of Love. Torn, Hargrove's alternative then has been to argue for strategic voting: In other words, while the paramount task is to defeat the Harris regime, this may mean in practice, the labour movement throwing their resources behind candidates other than the NDP if the NDP cannot win the riding. In effect they will be throwing their support behind the corporate Liberal party. Unfortunately the discussion around this policy was framed largely in terms of support for strategic voting or the traditional support of the NDP. Those who tried to argue a third policy were given little room for debate. After a long and heated debate at the CAW council in Port Elgin in December of 98, Hargrove's policy was adopted. Despite the fact that many CAW activists believe that most locals will pay only lip service this policy, the net effect will be to drag the CAW rightward and undermine any credibility the union has as a militant organization. Red & Black Notes #8, Spring 1999

Buzz developed his poltical plan of Strategic Voting around these events. But it has been a massive failure politically. And his current bid to be a Kingmaker with his mistaken Anybody But Harper Campaign seems out of step with current election reality. That was yesterdays campaign. But Buzz is hardheaded if nothing else. Unfortunately in politics that can mean disaster as his Strategic Voting campaign against Mike Harris in 1999 proved.

Union leaders themselves are partly to blame for being taken for granted by McGuinty. Canadian Auto Workers president Buzz Hargrove, for example, refuses even now to say a bad word about McGuinty, who has promised to keep in place Mike Harris's pro-scab labour law.
"My campaign is to defeat the Mike Harris government and I don't care who gets elected, they can't be as bad," Hargrove says.

Earlier this month, the union's Canada Council voted by a majority of about two-thirds to endorse CAW president Buzz Hargrove's call for "strategic voting" to defeat the current Tory government--i.e. to support Liberal candidates wherever the nominees of the trade union-based New Democratic Party have little chance of defeating the Tory candidate. Although the "strategic voting" resolution did not specifically call for the election of a Liberal government, the province's parliamentary arithmetic and the NDP's current low-level of popular support make it all but inevitable that the CAW will be supporting the Liberals in a majority of Ontario's 103 parliamentary constituencies. The CAW resolution commits the union to "defeating as many Harris Tories as possible ... with the knowledge that this may bolster the Liberal campaign," and "not resourcing NDP campaigns without a chance." In speaking before the CAW's leading body, Hargrove was less circumspect. He sought to bolster Ontario Liberal leader Dalton McGuinty, proclaiming him as "at least ... not anti-labour."

Wow word for word what Buzz said today about Paul Martins Liberals versus Harpers Conservatives.

What's the buzz
Tell me what's a-happening

The NDP's own right wing rump further exasperated this situation over the years by demanding the party distance itself from the Labour movement, a movement that was the party's founding partner. The seperation which is slowly leading to a divorce has been messy. Its ended up with provincial parties passing legislation when they are government that ends union and corporate donations to Political Parties. While claiming its no loss to do this cause the NDP gets little if any corporate support, its object is to break the ties that bind between the NDP and Labour. The result is those ties are broken. As Buzz proves. No use crying about it, the NDP made their bed and now can lay in it.

What's the buzz
Tell me what's a-happening

Of course if Buzz was a politician he wouldn't get elected he thinks out loud too much, and his strategic voting strategy is too out front. Samuel Gompers founder of the American Federation of Labour, was to the right of Buzz but had more political acumen, his was a the politics of pragmatism; you work behind the scenes by rewarding your friends and punishing your enemies. In Buzz's case his poltical agenda is clear, save jobs in Southern Ontario. And to do that he needs both Martin and Layton in power. However its not a politics of pragmatism, nor of the possible, its out in your face Buzz-ego politics that sow dissension on the Left.Even his own Executive Assistant who is running against a Liberal for the NDP says so.

In Parkdale-High Park, Peggy Nash, assistant to Canadian Auto Workers president Buzz Hargrove, is taking another run at the Liberals' Sarmite Bulte. The NDP nomination takes place tomorrow night. Bulte won last year with 19,727 votes to 16,201 for Nash. Conservative Jurij Klufas, also running again, got 7,221. Nash said the NDP was hurt in 2004 by voters going to the Liberals in order to stop the Conservatives. With another minority government a solid possibility this time around, voters are less likely to be scared away from the NDP, she argues.

Opps somebody should tell her about Buzz's plan. And pragmatically it could mean the defeat of some NDP candidates in close races as happened last election, leaving the hated Conservatives to get elected. Thanks Buzz.

What's the buzz
Tell me what's a-happening

Conservative Broadcasting Corporation?

John Bowman the CBC Election Blogger continues to ONLY blog about the Conservatives. His latest blog is about them fixing their security bug on their site, which meant folks couldn't give 'em money. This is news? This is worthy of blogging? I think not. And when he has quoted non Tory blogs, after his bosses noticed his bias, they are about wiat for it....the Conservatives. Hey Mothercorp time to replace JB.

Leaders Debate Deja View

The MSM have conspired to NOT include the Leader of the Green Party into their little club known as the Leaders TV Debate. Again just like last election. The difference is that this time the Green Party got enough votes that they get taxpayers money. So taxpayers should get to hear from them.
Shame! Shame! cry the members of the Progressive Blogging community pounding on their desks. We want to let them in on the debates.
The Green party is being given less attention this election than even last by the MSM and we ain't having it. The CBC places the Green Party under Other on their Web Site while the party earned enough votes to get taxpayer funding while the 'others' listed didn't come close.
If Buzz can get press for calling for Strategic voting, well its time fellow bloggers for us to demand fair play for the Green Party!
Whether ya vote for em or support em or NOT.
And so my fellow blogger, Murky View who is as offended as I over this deliberate censorship, err exclusion of the Greens from the Leaders TV Debate has launched a campaign to email complaints to the MSM.

Go Here and let the protest begin; CALL TO ACTION: Green Party not in Debate

And you can email the TV Debate gang and ask them to let the Greens In: question@electiondebate.ca

Orla has produced an online petition to lobby for the Greens Right to be in the debate. Regardless of whether you support them or vote for them its their right to be heard.

Dump the Conservative.ca blog

I have sent this little missive to the Conservatives about their election web-blog.

Dear Conservative.ca;
Your election blog is booooooring. Warmed over press releases do not a blog make. If you would like to see what a real blog looks like check out one of your own; Monte Solberg. Now while Mr. Solberg and I do not see eye to eye on practically anything, except perhaps our fondness for Timmys coffee when working, he is a shining example of what your blog should be. If you want a real election blog, dump yours and link to his.
Sincerely,
Eugene Plawiuk

Will Monte Buy Shares in Timmy's?

Conservative Finance Critic and caffine driven blogger; Monte Solbergs favorite coffee shop Tim Hortons is going on the market with a share offering that the National Post reports they expect Canadians to buy up. Big appetite seen for Tim Hortons offering Will Monte put his money where his mouth is? There had been speculation Wendy's would sell the initial stake in Tim Hortons as an income fund. The company chose to sell common shares instead because, should Wendy's want to spin off the rest of its stake to shareholders, the transaction would be tax-free. Ah shucks no income trust tax shelter for Monte he will actually have to take a risk. As a confirmed capitalist apologist will he or won't he? Will he put his money where his coffee cup hits? Inquirying minds want to know.

Where Are Your Clothes Made

The Maquila Solidarity Network has released its Transparency Report Card: COMING CLEAN ON THE CLOTHES WE WEAR Check it out and see how Canadian Retailers and Suppliers rank as suppliers of Sweat Shop labour.

Gildan Sweat Shop Success Story

Gildan profit soars

Profile

Gildan Activewear is a vertically-integrated marketer and manufacturer of premium quality branded basic apparel. The Company manufactures premium quality basic T-shirts, sport shirts and sweatshirts for sale in the wholesale imprinted sportswear market. The Company sells its products as blanks, which are ultimately decorated by screenprinters with designs and logos for sale to consumers. Gildan has announced plans to sell its products into the mass-market retail channel, in addition to the screenprint market. In conjunction with this strategy, Gildan is expanding its product-line to include underwear and athletic socks.

Gildan is North America's largest T-Shirt manufacturer, and it is Canadian.
After closing its yarn spining plant in Quebec and outsourcing the work offshore, Gildan exports its T-Shirt manufaturing to the Caribbean/Central American Free Trade Zones.

Moneysense.ca | Oct 1, 2004

Real Assets Investment Management Inc., an ethics-based investor, said Thursday it has sold its shares of Gildan Activewear over the T-shirt company's treatment of workers at a Honduras factory.

This year they agreed to re-hire fired union workers in their new factory operations in the Houndouras leading the Canadian Anti-Sweat Shop Activist group Maquila Solidarity Network to suspend their campaign against Gildan.

Gildan then launched a massive new advertising and promotional camapaign for its products helping it push up its sceond, third and fourth quarter profits. Coincidence I think NOT. No word on what happened to the workers in Quebec who lost their jobs at Gildan. No compensation just the unemployment centre for them.

And while the Anti-Sweat Shop campaigners have been satisfied with their sop from Gildan, the Anti-War movement has not. They have focused on Gildan's sweat shop operations taking advantage of the current Canadian/UN occupation of Haiti in the name of Empire.

Building an Antiwar Movement in Canada

The single biggest impediment to getting people mobilized around war and occupation issues is the widespread perception that Canada’s hands are clean in the world; that unseemly regime changes are things carried out by George W. Bush and that at worst we are benevolent bystanders or well-meaning peacekeepers coming in after the fact.

Perhaps one under-utilized way to get around this pervasive myth is to highlight the blatant war profiteering of massive Canadian corporations. While the sordid operations of the likes of Exxon and Halliburton are internationally known, equally rapacious war companies based north of the 49th parallel are getting away with scant attention. The two that stand out are Gildan Activewear and SNC-Lavalin.

Gildan Activewear is a massive garment manufacturer, controlling 40% of the North American t-shirt market. Following the coup against Aristide, and the de facto government’s decision to overturn minimum wage increases brought in by the Lavalas Party government, Gildan announced that it would be moving some operations from Honduras to Haiti. The company is currently engaged in a massive publicity campaign, with ads on hundreds of bus shelters in Vancouver proclaiming the sweatshop label ‘A part of your life’. It has been speculated that they are building their public profile with an eye to winning the Vancouver 2010 Olympics clothing contract. The cases of Gildan and SNC are not unique in terms of Canadian corporations, but only two of the most blatant examples that belie the quaint notion of a harmless, innocent big business community, and the related myth of a political policy pursuing lofty, disinterested ‘humanitarian’ objectives.

Again Liberal trade policies are a direct cause of the offshoring of Quebecs clothing industry and Gildans success. And with Gildan they are further compounded by the companies involvement with the Canadian Occupation of Haiti. Welcome to the world of global capitalism.

This is a report from Haiti about Gildan detailing the union busting anti worker situation currently occuring in the offshore garment industry in that country. I have to ask MSN why it has been sucked in by Gildan and halted its information and pressure campaign for the rights of Gildan workers? Simply because the company has ameliorated the conditions of some of its workers at the expense of others? This seems to be the case.

"Excerpts from Batay Ouvriye News Bulletin No. 2, originally published in Creole circa September/October 2005

At the GILDAN factory in Tabarre, five workers were fired without reason. But on closer scrutiny, we note that these are the workers who played a role in fighting for the factory to pay transportation to and from the factory (which is actually stipulated in the Labor Code!). At first, Richard Coles, a close Aristide ally, was the main production responsible for Gildan in the country. But Coles lost the contract and Apaid is the one who came to play this role. Presently, several bourgeois in the assembly industry are producing for Gildan. All use the module production to exploit the workers, as described above, with repressive control embedded in the production structure itself… Gildan, however, is the most sadistic exploiter of the module production systems. That’s why struggle at Gildan is a concentration amongst others that has great importance presently.

Hillary Does Gore

Hillary Clinton promotes law to ban violent video games

Shades of Tipper Gore, Hillary's bosom buddy, who led the charge to ban explicit lyrics in Rock and Roll. Yep Hillary is running for Prez in 08. Showing she is tough on the Entertainment Industry and Crime in one fell swoop. Hey it worked for Tipper, during the height of the Republican attacks on Porn.

Harpers health-care plan

Harper to roll out Tory health-care plan. Betcha it looks like this.

Job Cuts Poll #1

Job Losses Since November 2005- 6717
December 2- CIBC Cuts 900 Jobs
Current Total- 7617 Canadians out of work

"The real story is what doesn't happen in the headlines; it's the five or 10 jobs that are lost each week or each month and eventually they really tend to add up.That's one of the bigger stories that's looming over every other minor cyclical story we talk about," said Doug Porter, deputy chief economist at BMO Nesbitt Burns.

Through the Election I will be running a jobs cut poll. The numbers of folks losing thier jobs in Canada.This is a direct result of the Liberals and Conservatives economic strategies, or lack of them, that impact on real working folks in Canada.

CIBC has announced that due to its illegal entaglement with Enron it is cutting 900 jobs to make up for the billions they had to pay in fines. While workers at the Bank lose their jobs the CEO in charge during the Enron affair got massive pay raises and bonuses. The bank attracted a lot of criticism from some shareholders when it awarded former CEO John Hunkin a retirement package worth $52 million just a month before the bank reported a $1.9 billion quarterly loss because of its Enron settlement. While CIBC is also purging management who are leaving with Golden Parachutes, after laying Golden Showers on their employees and shareholders. The bloodletting at the bank has already begun, with $100 million spent in the fourth quarter on severance payments for 50 parting executives: 10 executive vice-presidents, 21 senior vice-presidents and 19 vice-presidents.

While Stats Canada reports; Jobless rate drops to 6.4%, another 30-year low.
the reality is that this is NOT full employment which was promised all workers after the end of WWII. Nor has there ever been full employment in any of the G8.

Big Brother Wal-Mart

CBC is reporting that Wal-Mart in Quebec spied on union organizers prior to closing its only unionized store in Quebec. Which is illegal under labour law in Quebec. Ah say it ain't so. Which is exactly what the Canadian CEO of Wal-Mart said. Lets see two exposes on bad boy Wal-Mart this week by Radio Canada. The other was about Wal-Mart using Child Labour. Nice to see that there is some investigative journalism going on at MotherCorp.

That's what journalism is supposed to be about muckracking and investigative journalism, the values of a liberal/left media. The ones the right wing fails to provide and hates when anyone else does. Oh unless the muck flinging is against their political enemies.

GST or Global Warming You Choose

Cut the GST or Cut Emissions you choose. Which should be THE election issue?

In his column in the Toronto Star this morning business commentator David Crane asks the key question about this election. Is it about ISSUES or spin. So far its been spin, all about tax cuts. Crane on the other hand reminds us that the International Conference on Climate Change, Kyoto2, just finished in Montreal. He says; Global warming should be big election issue, too bad it not going to be.

Global warming should be big election issue
Whether we wanted a winter election or not, we have one courtesy of NDP leader Jack Layton. So we should at least hope the campaign will focus on the big issues facing Canada.One of the most important issues we face is how to deal with climate change. Make no mistake about it; human beings are building up a host of nasty future problems because of our huge dependence on coal, oil and, to a lesser extent, natural gas. Just look at our Arctic, where major warming is already underway. And this is the real question that both Martin and Tory leader Stephen Harper must answer: Do they support a Kyoto-2 beyond 2008-12 and, if so, how would they move to further reduce Canada's greenhouse gas emissions? This is one of the most important issues facing us because unless much more serious efforts are made, by ourselves and other nations, our planet is in serious trouble. Then the GST rate won't matter much.

Made In Canada Autoplan

No sooner had Jack Layton announced his auto strategy for saving Canadian jobs and investing all those tax breaks the Liberals and Conservatives are promising the corporations than it was lost in the newshype around the Harpers GST cut. Swamped was Jacks good news announcement. Swept away. But like the proverbial bottle with a message this morning his announcement takes on even more importance.

Ford has announced it is planning on following GM's lead and will be laying off 7,600 workers across North America, with its closing of five plants including one in Windsor Ontario and ironically one in Mexico. Ironic cause the plant is one set up thanks to NAFTA. When will the bleeding stop? When we have a Made In Canada Autoplan. Tax cuts don't cut it when your out of work.

Whigs and Tory's

It is not just Harper and the Conservative Gang in Calgary that have been influenced by the neo-con Straussian ideal of Empire and the rule of the philospher king. So has Liberal Michael Ingnatieff more than even his cousin the philosopher George Grant.

Strauss’s rejection of individual rights led him to espouse political views that Rothbard found repellent: "We find Strauss . . . praising ‘farsighted’, ‘sober’ British imperialism; we find him discoursing on the ‘good’ Caesarism, on Caesarism as often necessary and not really tyranny, etc... he praises political philosophers for yes, lying to their readers for the sake of the ‘social good’…. I must say that this is an odd position for a supposed moralist to take."

THE IDEAS OF GEORGE GRANT*
As philosophy became more technical and remote, George Grant never stopped trying to reach a wide audience. In his writing and teaching, he dealt philosophically with the basic issues facing Canada: imperialism and national survival, the nature of technology, the moral bankruptcy of liberalism, and the claims of tradition in face of the modern. He wrestled with some of the most commanding figures of modern thought: Simone Weil, Leo Strauss, Friedrich Nietzsche and Martin Heidegger. David Cayley explores George Grant's intellectual career, based on interviews with Grant himself, students, interpreters and critics.


The difference today between Liberals and Conservatives, both of whom claim to come from the liberal tradition, is that the Liberals reflect the utilitarian social democrat tradition of classical liberalism, they are in effect modern Whigs.

While the neo-cons who dominate the Conservative movement reflect the Imperialist aspirations of the old Conservative/Tory aristorcracy. America while a Republic of agrarian artisanal virtues has a ruling class that has always aspired to Empire, in mimicry of England. The Southern Aristocratic States that formed the Confederacy and their culture of 'Ladies and Gentlemen' reflect this unrepentant urge to return to the past as all conservatives do.

In accepting Empire Ignatieff is a blue Liberal far closer to the compardor politics of Harper's foriegn policy than classical Trudeau liberalism.

Trudeau liberalism is Whig politics that challenges both the rampant free market individualism espoused by the neo-cons, and its opposite socialism. His was an ideology of invidual rights and freedoms within the State, not opposed to the State. The State's function was too defend and expand these rights. So entrenched was his sense of social individualism that he was willing to trample collective political rights, those of Quebec, to create a made in Canada Constitution and Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Today both these are opposed by the neo-con right and the Soveriegnists in Quebec. Ironic that the neo-cons who extoll individualism attack the Charter, Harper, Kenney, Ezra Levant, etc. but that is because it is both a Charter of social rights and Individual rights. It is Trudeaus legacy, and that is what they hate. The right in Canada has always hated Trudeau and his philosophy.

Todays Liberals embrace not Trudeauism, but Ignatieff. As one would a serpent to the breast. All is done for the expediency of power. Power for its own sake. Their ideology is messaging without content, all is platitude to retain power. Intellectually bankrupt they grab at Ignatieff as their new philosopher, when he is a mere shade of Grant or Trudeau. As a shade his bankrupt ideology cannot stand the exposure of the light of reason.

In this Ignatieff is as much influenced by Leo Struass conservative philosopher of Empire as he is by his esteemed cousin, George Grant. Ignatieff has accepted the existance of Empire and like the flawed logic of his cousin, has concluded that democracy is at home in the American Empire. Hence his extolling how he is an American. Of course in this context like Grant to be an American is to be a Continentalist, we are 'all Americans' now.

Trudeau was the philosopher politician who answered Grants lamantation. In his ideal of a New Federalism, Trudeau challenged the Red Tory ideology of acquiecence to America, and viewed Canada and Quebec as a capable of challenging America on the basis of classical traditional liberalism. Not just a rampant self aggrandizing individualism so common amongst American ideologues on the right but a social individualism. One that didn't say; I am alright Jack I got mine, but said; I am alright Jack because you got yours.

It was nearly twenty years after Grants lament that Trudeau brought Canada its constitution and Charter, that would fulfill Grants dream of a Canada different from the United States. Grant was a Whig, Trudeau was a Whig. Ignatieff is not. He is an apologist for Empire.

And the Conservatives in Canada are not Tories, they are Republicans, and not the party of Lincoln who was also a Whig, but a party of the rights of the shop keeper. Their belief in individual rights are only for those who own, not even possess, property. They would embrace America and George Grant would wail in lament from his grave. For he had warned us of these traitorous dogs forty years ago.

The major themes of Grant's interests made him, at once, a foundational thinker and an interpreter of current events. Deeply concerned with the political and social directions being taken in postwar Canada leading into the sixties and seventies, he also fiercely resisted the new, progressively functional purposes shaping Canadian universities during those years. At the root of his thinking lies his conviction that the liberal project of the Enlightenment, which has shaped life in western society for more than 200 years and is now dominating our whole planet, was a massive mistake--nothing less than a denial, through the glorification of instrumental reason and technology, of the true nature of the world and of human persons. Grant turned to Plato, to the contemporary Platonist Leo Strauss and to the philosopher-mystic Simone Weil for aid in his own intellectual transformation away from this modern view of humanity based on the primacy of will, the mastery of nature, individualism and the shaping of society essentially by market-driven capitalism.

LAMENTATION AND SPECULATION:
GEORGE GRANT, JAMES DOULL AND THE POSSIBILITY OF CANADA

David G. Peddle
Sir Wilfred Grenfell College, MUN

Neil G. Robertson
University of King's College

In 1965 George Grant created a national debate when he published his classic text, Lament for a Nation. The central thesis of this book was captured in its subtitle, "The Defeat of Canadian Nationalism." While Grant sees the defeat of Diefenbaker's government in 1963 as emblematic of the inability of Canadians to sustain their independence from the United States, he argues that the causes of this defeat lay deeper than any particular political event. For Grant, the sources of Canada's demise lay in the philosophical and political spirit of modernity and in the technological domination it asserts. He saw in Canadian Nationalism the noble belief that a more stable, conservative society could exist on the borders of the United States, the nation which, on his view, more than any other embodied this technological modernity. In 1963, Grant argued, the folly, the impossibility of this belief had finally exposed itself.

Warren Kinsellas Pals Support Harper

Zionist commentator and radio host Tovias on Israel National Radio interviews his "good friend" Stockwell Day, of the Conservative Party "Thank God for them". And he denounces Canada's deploarable record of not supporting Isreal in the UN. Listen to it here. Israel has "no greater friend than you in Canada." said Tovias of his pal Day. And poor Warren thought he was there best friend.

A Good Reason Not To Vote For Harper

Harper, Bush Share Roots in Controversial Philosophy

What do close advisors to Stephen Harper and George W. Bush have in common? They reflect the disturbing teachings of Leo Strauss, the German-Jewish émigré who spawned the neoconservative movement.

Strauss, who died in 1973, believed in the inherent inequality of humanity. Most people, he famously taught, are too stupid to make informed decisions about their political affairs. Elite philosophers must decide on affairs of state for us.

In Washington, Straussians exert powerful influence from within the inner circle of the White House. In Canada, they roost, for now, in the so-called Calgary School, guiding Harper in framing his election strategies. What preoccupies Straussians in both places is the question of "regime change."

Strauss defined a regime as a set of governing ideas, institutions and traditions. The neoconservatives in the Bush administration, who secretly conspired to make the invasion of Iraq a certainty, had a precise plan for regime change. They weren't out to merely replace Saddam with an American puppet. They planned to make the system more like the U.S., with an electoral process that can be manipulated by the elites, corporate control over the levers of power and socially conservative values.

More Shaw Quotes

Thought I would share some more George Bernard Shaw quotes with ya all.

Democracy is a device that ensures we shall be governed no better than we deserve.

Self-sacrifice enables us to sacrifice other people without blushing.

Lack of money is the root of all evil.

Gambling promises the poor what property performs for the rich--something for nothing.

I often quote myself. It adds spice to my conversation.

The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.

A Real Economist Responds to Harper

The Harper told the press he was an economist when announcing his GST cut.
If all economists were laid end to end, they would not reach a conclusion. George Bernard Shaw
Hmm, I thought he was a policy wonk for the National Citizens Coalition.....anyways here is a response from a REAL economist to Harpers 2% GSTcut.(which still leaves 5% GST, the Harper is not bold enough to eliminate it entirely so why bother fiddling with it). It is appropriately entitled; Dumb and Dumber.

Harper Hates Government

"I believe that all taxes are bad," Harper said "Better taxes are lower taxes. Government has money to waste, government has money to steal, government has money to spend on benefits for a few. It's time for benefits for mainstream Canadians, hard-working people who pay their taxes and play by the rules." So the Harper hates government why is he running for Prime Minister and why is his neo-con Republican Lite party running to be the government if they hate taxes so much. Taxes fund the government. The government then spreads the wealth around through programs like oh Healthcare, Transfer payments, CPP/OAS, the military, etc. Whats with the rightwing speak about 'benefits for the few'..who are these 'special interests' farmers? Seniors? University Students? Autoworkers? Are these not hard working Canadians ?
Now there has been alot of talk about the hidden agenda the the Conservatives have. It ain't hidden its right here. Its the Harpers former employer, the National Citizens Coalition Agenda for Canada.

We call our vision "The Agenda for Canada".

The Agenda for Canada addresses these key issues:

Financial Accountability
Canada needs to cut big government spending, find innovative ways to get a better return on our health-care investments, and allow Canadians to keep more of the money they earn.

Representative Accountability
The scandals must stop. Canadians need to push for a democratically elected senate, a strong military, a privatized CBC and more direct democracy.

Individual Freedoms and Responsibility
Canada needs to entrench property rights, repeal the gag law and end the Wheat Board monopoly. Canada needs to restore rights to union workers, end CRTC censorship and restore language rights to English speaking Quebeckers.

If Canada’s political leaders will not promote a new vision for Canada, then the NCC will. But we need your help!

Have a read through our Agenda for Canada and let us know what you think. Or, better yet, help us fund an ad campaign that will make the Agenda for Canada part of the national debate.

We need to let Canadians know that there is another option to the failed big government solutions of the past.

Your generous contribution to this campaign can make the Agenda for Canada a reality. With your support we can print more Agenda for Canada booklets, print newspaper ads, run radio commercials and use the internet to get the message out.

Now more than ever Canada needs a positive vision. The NCC’s Agenda for Canada is that vision. Help us get the message out.