Thursday, December 09, 2021

UK 
Night Tube strike: Disruption expected on London Underground's Victoria and Central lines this weekend

Transport for London has advised people to use buses and check their travel plans before heading out into the capital ahead of strikes this weekend.



Thursday 9 December 2021
The Night Tube was suspended at the start of the pandemic

Night Tube services in London will be disrupted again this weekend, as drivers strike in a dispute over new rosters.

Transport for London (TfL) has warned people that journeys on the Central and Victoria lines may be "severely disrupted" from 7pm on Friday and Saturday evening.

Walkouts by Rail, Maritime and Transport (RMT) union members will take place on those lines for eight hours.

Image:People are facing travel disruption on Friday and Saturday

Why are drivers striking?

The union is disputing rosters that they say have been imposed without agreement, with the Night Tube's return only recently announced after 20 months closed.

London Underground (LU) insists drivers will only be required to work up to four night shift weekends a year, and that they have the option of swapping shifts with colleagues.

There will also be no job losses and drivers can stay part-time if desired, LU says.

But RMT general secretary Mick Lynch said that the strike action was due to LU rejecting an offer on Tuesday.

Mr Lynch said: "They are now prolonging a dispute that will cost them more than settling because their managers have made a series of errors and don't want to admit it publicly."

Travel advice for this weekend


Nick Dent, LU's director of customer operations, has apologised to customers for the disruption, urging them to check before travelling on the Victoria and Central lines.

"Consider using buses where possible," he advised.



Post-pandemic travel


The Night Tube's return was announced in October, having been suspended since March 2020 at the start of the coronavirus pandemic.

It was meant to be back from 27 November, in time for the busy Christmas period.

Follow the latest COVID-19 news in our live blog

"We know this is the last thing London needs at the moment as it tries to recover from the pandemic," said Mr Dent.

There are already concerns that the government's new Plan B measures will result in lower footfall on public transport because of the work from home guidance.


London braces for further tube strikes amid new plan to shed 600 jobs

Unions condemn TfL pre-Christmas move to reduce customer service posts as ‘cynical’ and ‘shameless’


TfL is poised to impose a recruitment freeze on customer services jobs. 
Photograph: James Manning/PA


Gwyn Topham Transport correspondent
@GwynTopham
Tue 7 Dec 2021 18.03 GMT

London could be hit by further tube strikes after transport bosses outlined plans to shed 600 posts to combat the effects of the pandemic on the capital’s finances.

Transport for London (TfL) is poised to impose a recruitment freeze on customer services jobs, with about 250 currently unfilled and further 350 posts to go as and when staff leave.

The RMT union said it would ballot its London members for industrial action to stop what it called a “cynically engineered crisis”, while the TSSA union said the timing before Christmas was “shameful”.

TfL said discussions were at an early stage, but the underground would remain well staffed, with more than 4,500 customer service staff across the network.

Nick Dent, London Underground’s director of customer operations, said: “The devastating impact of the pandemic on our finances has made a programme of change urgently necessary.

“The safety and security of customers and colleagues is still our top priority, and we will ensure in all circumstances our staff will continue to be visible and available to help customers at all times – including offering the on-demand turn up and go service to assist disabled customers.”

Strikes have already been called in response to changes over working conditions around the night tube, with RMT members on affected lines walking out at weekend evenings until Christmas, and a 24-hour strike scheduled for 18 December.


Boris Johnson says unions are 'holding gun' to London's head with tube strike


More widespread action is now likely, with the RMT fearing the plan to axe 600 posts is the start of further cuts, with the government imposing stringent conditions on the funds it has given to London.

The RMT general secretary, Mick Lynch, said TfL’s crisis had “been deliberately engineered by the government to drive a cuts agenda which would savage jobs, services, safety and threaten the working conditions and‎ pensions of our members … The politicians need to wake up to the fact that transport staff will not pay the price for this cynically engineered crisis.”
Advertisement

Lorraine Ward, the TSSA’s organising director, said the union would fight job losses: “We need to encourage more people on to public transport, but cutting station staff will damage that effort. Staff are already fearful for their futures and the way that London Underground has snuck this out just weeks before Christmas is shameful.

London has appealed to central government for more emergency funding to cover the shortfall in revenue, with billions lost in tube fares since passengers were told to avoid public transport at the start of the pandemic.

While demand has come back to about 60% of pre-pandemic levels on weekdays, a TfL report on travel trends published this week said that demand may stay below previous forecasts, with an expected rise in journeys not materialising after “freedom day” when Covid restrictions were lifted in July. It said 84% of workers expect to have some form of hybrid working in future, with only about 70% of people yet returning to city workplaces at all.

Talks have started between TfL and the government before an 11 December deadline, when the current deal runs out. TfL is looking for a further £1.7bn in funding until April 2023, but even under the existing settlement it has committed to reduce expenditure.

The transport commissioner, Andy Byford, has warned that without support London faces a “bleak future” of managed decline, while the city’s mayor, Sadiq Khan, has said there would be “no choice but to make significant cuts to services just as demand is growing again”.

A government spokesperson said: “We will continue to discuss any further funding requirements with TfL and the mayor, and any support provided will focus on getting TfL back on to a sustainable financial footing in a way that is fair to taxpayers across the country.”

Tube and bus services face cuts as TfL will ‘run out of money’ in four days

Comment
James Hockaday
Wednesday 8 Dec 2021
Sadiq Khan has urged the Government to save TfL from service cuts and ‘managed decline’ (Picture: Metro.co.uk)

More funding is needed to save the capital’s transport network from a ‘cycle of decline’ that has ‘plagued’ the city, business leaders warn.

Since the start of the pandemic, Transport for London (TfL) has secured more than £4billion in funding through three government bailouts to keep its Tube and bus services running.

But its current deal runs out on December 11 and Transport Secretary Grant Shapps is yet to meet with Mayor Sadiq Khan to discuss another rescue package.

If a deal isn’t cut in time, it could mean bus routes will have to be reduced by a fifth, while London Underground services would be cut by almost 10%.


The cancellation of supply chain contracts is also expected to affect 43,000 jobs in Derby, Falkirk, Bolton, Liverpool, Yorkshire, and Ballymena, Northern Ireland.

Concerns also remain that the Bakerloo Line will be permanently closed as a way of cutting costs.

Bus services would have to be cut by almost 10% unless the transport network gets another bailout (Picture: Getty Images)

Earlier this week Khan told CityAM there had been ‘no engagement’ from Shapps. He added: ‘Time is running out to save TfL from a managed decline scenario.

‘I hope the government will get round the table in the next few days so we can save London’s transport network, and with it the economic recovery in the capital and wider country.’

However a government spokesperson said the issue was that Khan ‘agreed to identify new or increased income sources’ by November 19, but that ‘these have not been identified’.

A £1.6billion bailout was agreed in May 2020, followed by a £1.8billion deal in November, which was extended until the end of May.

A third deal in June provided a further £1.08billion to keep the transport network afloat.

The Mayor of London says there has been ‘no engagement’ from Whitehall over the crisis (Picture: AP)

At the start of the pandemic, TFL’s fare revenues plummeted by 90%, and there has been a similar fall in income from advertising, the BBC reports.

There were 200million bus and Tube journeys in the four weeks to mid-October – compared to 271million in the same period of February 2020.

TfL needs £500million from central government to keep services running this year and much more to save the network in the long-run.

A group of 83 companies, groups and organisations have called for a fair deal to be reached with the transport body to ensure the capital has proper infrastructure to support its economy.

In a letter to Chancellor Rishi Sunak, they said: ‘As leaders of a diverse range of businesses and organisations, we are writing to express our serious concern about the future of London’s transport.

It is feared the Bakerloo line could be permanently closed down unless more funding is provided (Picture: PA)

‘The decisions taken regarding TfL’s funding in the coming days will have profound and long-term impacts for the UK’s economy, the achievability of the capital’s environmental targets, and the lives of individuals across the wider South East – particularly those who are most disadvantaged and whose communities are amongst those most in need of levelling up.

‘London’s economic success – and the substantial and tangible benefits it delivers for the wider UK – cannot be taken for granted.’

They added that without ‘sufficient financial support to deal with the continued effects of the pandemic we may soon fall back into the cycle of decline that plagued the capital before the creation of Transport for London’.

A Government spokesperson said: ‘We have repeatedly shown our commitment to supporting London’s transport network through the pandemic, providing more than £4billion in emergency funding to Transport for London.

‘We will continue to discuss any further funding requirements with TfL and the mayor, and any support provided will focus on getting TfL back on to a sustainable financial footing in a way that is fair to taxpayers across the country.’

USA
Steelworkers union warns workers about potential strike early next year at Newport News Shipbuilding

By DAVE RESS
DAILY PRESS |
DEC 08, 2021 

Steelworkers at Newport News Shipbuilding have been told to prepare to strike early next year. (Jonathon Gruenke/Daily Press)

With no bargaining sessions planned before the traditional Christmas break at Newport News Shipbuilding, United Steelworkers local 8888 has warned its members to be ready for a walkout next year.

“There is no way to sugarcoat the bruising fight ahead,” the union said in a letter distributed to members this week, while promising to “do everything possible to settle” on an acceptable contract.

“The company must know we are prepared to walk out and stay out to get the contract we deserve,” the letter added.

The union represents more than 10,000 of the shipyard’s 25,000 employees. Last month, members rejected a tentative contract agreement by a 1312-684 vote. That proposed contract had a 60-month term, with annual pay increases, a $2,500 bonus and improvements to pension plans.

“Voting down the first contract offer definitely got the Company’s attention. But it will take much, much more — bold collective action and personal sacrifice — to resolve this contract dispute,” the union’s letter said. “No one wants to go through the economic hardship that comes with missing paychecks and scrambling to make ends meet.
Advertisement

“But the best way to prevent a strike is to prepare for one – seriously.”

The letter said union leaders were laying the groundwork for organizing picket lines, as well as assistance programs for union members.

The union said letters the shipyard mailed to every member’s home detailing its interpretation of the contract was “old tactic was intended to divide the membership.”

The shipyard didn’t respond to requests for comment.

The union’s last strike was in 1999. That lasted 17 weeks. It ended when union members accepted a 58-month contract that guaranteed at least two promotions for most workers, raise pay 23 percent and pensions 78 percent.


Local 8888 was recognized in 1979, after a strike that included a confrontation between shipbuilders and club-swinging police now remembered by older union members as Bloody Monday.




Dave Ress
Staff Writer
Dave Ress covers the military. He's been a reporter in Virginia since 1990 and before that for Reuters in Canada, Britain and Africa. Dave has a PhD in history from the University of New England (Australia) and is the author of 4 books on U.S. and Australian history.
SCOTLAND
UK nuclear weapons workers to go on strike at Clyde base in row over pay

EXCLUSIVE: Specialist staff at Coulport will down tools in a row that a union claims could threaten the operational capacity of the UK's nuclear deterrent.



Chris McCall
Deputy Political Editor
 9 DEC 2021
Contractors employed to maintain the weapons systems used on Trident submarines will walk out next week (Image: PA)

Contractors employed to maintain the weapons systems on Trident nuclear submarines are set to walk out on strike next week in a row over pay.

Specialist staff at the the Coulport armaments base on Loch Long will down tools for 24 hours on both December 16 and 20 unless a last minute deal with bosses can be reached.

Further days of strike action are scheduled on January 11 and 25 as well as February 8 and 22.

Unite the union has called for the ABL Alliance - which employs the civilian workers - to offer a pay rise of 3.8 per cent in line with inflation.

The high security Coulport base by the Firth of Clyde is the storage facility for nuclear warheads which are loaded on to Royal Navy submarines based at nearby Faslane.

Staff involved are employed by three separate private companies - AWE, Babcock Marine, and Lockheed Martin UK Strategic Systems - which form part of the ABL Alliance, a joint venture which won a 15-year contract from the Ministry of Defence in 2013 to maintain weapons systems on the Clyde.

The union has heavily criticised the ABL Alliance for its “delay tactics” after 90.5% of its members at Coulport previously voted yes in support of strike action.

It has claimed strike action at such a strategically important naval base is unprecedented in recent times.

The Ministry of Defence (MOD) insisted the safe management of Coulport "would not be compromised" by any strike action.

Sharon Graham, Unite general secretary, said: “For months now these extremely profitable companies have dragged their feet over giving our members the fair pay award they deserve.

"Unite’s priority is to fight for the jobs, pay and conditions of our members, and these highly skilled workers at Coulport and Faslane naval bases have the union’s full support in this dispute.”

Stevie Deans, Unite regional coordinator, said: “The ABL Alliance employers have completely disrespected, undervalued and underappreciated our members. Unite has continually sought to resolve this pay dispute but the ABL Alliance at every stage of the process have seem determined to force an escalation.

"Our members have been left with no choice but to take strike action in addition to the overtime ban, and we are determined to get the pay rise these workers deserve.”

An MOD spokesman said: “The UK Government is aware of the ongoing pay negotiations between the ABL Alliance and the Unite trade union and we are hopeful that a resolution will be reached by all parties.

“The continued safe operation of HM Naval Base Clyde is of paramount importance and the safe management of the port will not be compromised.”
Holdout unions approve contract, Disneyland averts strike

The Harbor Boulevard entrance to the Disneyland Resort in Anaheim.
(Chris Carlson / Associated Press)
STAFF WRITER DEC. 8, 2021

Disneyland heads into the holidays without any picket lines outside its gates following a second contract vote that finally found favor with two remaining unions.

The Master Services Council, a coalition of four major unions that represents 9,500 workers at the Disneyland Resort, bargained with the company for months before reaching a tentative agreement in November.

All member unions ratified the contract at Disney’s California Adventure during the initial Nov. 17 vote, but Disneyland saw an unprecedented split.

Teamsters Local 495, which is the largest member of the coalition, and Service Employees International Union-United Service Workers West soundly rejected the company’s proposal at Disneyland, which included pay raises to $18.50 an hour by 2023 and seniority-based bonuses.

The holdout unions represent ride operators, parking and custodial staff respectively at the theme park.

Union leaders met with the company, which agreed to present its “last and final” offer for another round of voting, though it wasn’t obligated to. After all the votes were tallied by Dec. 3, both unions ratified the contract and averted a strike.

“The Disneyland Resort is pleased that cast members of the Disneyland Park represented by the Master Services Council ratified a new collective bargaining agreement,” said a Disneyland spokesperson. “Cast members from Disney California Adventure Park and Downtown Disney District previously ratified the same offer on Nov. 17th. We are proud of the competitive wage and benefit offer, which provides historical increases over three years, continuing to outpace the California minimum wage.”

Initially, the first round rejection sent a wave of confusion through the park’s workers.

Two other Disneyland unions, United Food and Commercial Workers Local 324 and Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers’ International Union Local 85, also comprise the Master Services Council but didn’t have to cast their ballots a second time.

In an update to its members, UFCW Local 324 cited a “large majority” having voted to approve the contract on Nov. 17. The company considered the union-specific tally to be a ratification.

Ahead of the rare revote, SEIU-USWW deemed the original proposal as the “highest general wage increases ever negotiated with Disney.” And, although members rejected ratification by 60 percent on Nov. 17, the tally fell short of the 75% needed to authorize a strike, per the union’s Constitution and bylaws.

Another strike authorization vote would be needed. If workers did vote to go out on strike, they wouldn’t be entitled to California unemployment insurance.

Meanwhile, some Teamster members renewed a push for wage increases to $20 an hour that they’d hoped would have been part of the original offer.

“I feel that all of us at Disneyland deserve more,” said Gabriel Ramos, a Teamster and Disneyland ride operator who voted no both times. “Many people voted yes the second time because they saw that the union wasn’t prepared for a strike, even though the majority of the members wanted to strike.”

The Disneyland Resort’s proposed contract remained identical. The minimum wage increase to $17.50 an hour would be pulled forward to Nov. 17 instead of taking effect June 2022.

Had the unions rejected the offer for a second time, workers were told that seniority-based bonuses and the retroactive raises were poised to be scrapped.

But more than two weeks of uncertainty came to an end when both holdout unions changed course and ratified the contract in joining the rest of their Master Services Council counterparts.

The early pay raises are effective for both Disney theme parks.

Disneyland hasn’t seen a major labor strike since 1984 when thousands of workers picketed outside of the theme park for 22 days in what remains the largest work stoppage in the theme park’s history.

UK

Scaffolders warn Rope Access company over British Steel strike breaking

 
A GIANT INFLATABLE RAT has joined British Steel scaffolders and strike campaigners outside a South Shields company.
Protesters outside Rope Access Trade Solutions in South Shields. Credit: Unite

A GIANT INFLATABLE RAT has joined British Steel scaffolders and strike campaigners outside a South Shields company.

Scaffolders and Unite the union has accused Rope Access Trade Solutions of supplying workers to help British Steel break a strike by scaffolders employed by Actavo (UK) at its site in Scunthorpe.

The protest took place outside Rope Access Trade Solutions South Shields address this morning (Wednesday 8 December).

The union has warned British Steel that engaging with the firm could be in breach of criminal law which prevents workers from being supplied to cover the duties of workers engaged in lawful industrial action.

62 scaffolders have been on continuous strike action for 9 weeks in a long-running dispute with their employer Actavo (UK). They are significantly underpaying their workers.

Unite says this breaks a national agreement that sets fair rates for the job and prevents a race to the bottom for construction workers. But Unite says that the client, British Steel, must also take responsibility for this long-running dispute.

Unite General Secretary Sharon Graham said: “We believe Rope Access Trade Solutions have been engaged by British Steel specifically to carry out works which would normally be done by our members who are on lawful strike. This may well be in breach of criminal law.  We also have evidence that other workers are being pressured into working for British Steel’s scaffolding contractor Actavo.

 “The workers on strike have their union’s steadfast support. Any attempt to break this strike will be fiercely resisted. My priority is to defend Unite members’ jobs, pay and conditions.

“Unite will not allow employers to use strike breakers to help erode workers’ pay. We will fight tooth and nail to stop the race to the bottom.”

Striking scaffolders at British Steel
Striking scaffolders at British Steel. Credit: Twitter/United Scaffs

The dispute, which began in 2019, is a result of the scaffolders not being paid in line with the National Agreement for the Engineering Construction Industry (NAECI).

The rates for the workforce are currently between 10-15 per cent (depending on specific roles) below these rates.

The workers maintain over 500 scaffolding structures at the British Steel site.


UK

Harrods restaurant staff win 25% pay rise after strike threat

Harrods
A union said early last month it would ballot Harrods staff about a potential strike over poor pay
// Harrods restaurant workers win 25% pay rise after strike threat action
// The United Voices of the World union said the deal meant a “new benchmark for pay in the hospitality sector”
// Harrods said the pay rise is not linked to the threat of strike action

Harrods restaurant workers have won a 25 per cent pay increase, which has averted the threatened strike action ahead of Christmas.

The United Voices of the World union (UVW), which represents waiters and chefs at the Knightsbridge department store, said the deal represented a “new benchmark for pay in the hospitality sector”.

Some Harrods workers are in line for £5000 extra in annual pay, with some chefs now earning more than £12.50 an hour.

The union said early last month that it would ballot staff about a potential strike over poor pay and a heavy workload for staff after job cuts.

“We’re proud to set a new benchmark for the sector, a sector notorious for poverty pay and appalling conditions,” UVW general secretary, Petros Elia said.

“This is affirmation of the power of organised and strike-ready workers – this remains the biggest and most powerful tool in workers’ arsenal today.

“The fight does not stop here: we are now talking with retail staff to ensure they are not left behind. We’ve been saying it’s time for £12 and now that time has arrived.”

Harrods has previously said that the rise in pay is not linked to the threat of union action. Instead, the increase came after three months of reviews.

The retailer said in a statement: “This has been entirely driven by ongoing discussions and work internally with our restaurant colleagues, and at no point during this three-month process have we engaged with a third party.

“We are consistently reviewing our pay policies to ensure we continue to attract and retain the best talent.”

TEAMSTERS LOCAL 174 STRIKE UPDATE: Concrete mixer drivers, dump truck drivers and cement plant employees walk off job after Employers fail to bargain in good faith

By Teamsters Local 174



International Brotherhood Of Teamsters. 
(PRNewsFoto/International Brotherhood of Teamsters)
By Teamsters Local 174

TUKWILA, Wash., Dec. 8, 2021 /PRNewswire/ -- A group of 330 Teamsters working for six different Employers are on picket lines today, prepared to go "one day longer than their employers" to reach a deal that has already been agreed to by all other construction-related companies. For 34 workers from Gary Merlino Construction, today marks day 18 on strike, while workers from Stoneway Concrete have been on strike since December 1. The picket lines have now grown to include workers from Cadman, CalPortland, Lehigh Cement, and Salmon Bay Sand & Gravel, bringing the full strike to 330 workers on picket lines twenty-four hours a day and seven days a week at 12 separate locations.

The Unfair Labor Practice strike began after contract negotiations fell apart, with the group of Employers – led by chief negotiator Charlie Oliver (Gary Merlino Construction) – failing to bargain in good faith with Teamsters Local 174.

As the holidays approach, the strike is taking an economic toll on the workgroup – especially those with children at home who are looking forward to Christmas. The affected Employers are telling customers to expect this to last into next year. If you would like to offer support to the workers, you can donate to the "Local 174 Merlino Heavy Highway and Sand & Gravel / Cement Industries Striking Workers Assistance Fund" here. You can also make a check out to "Teamsters 174 Worker Assistance Fund" and send to:

Teamsters Local 174
14675 Interurban Ave S Suite 303
Tukwila, WA 98168

Donation weblink in case hyperlink above does not work: https://square.link/u/ira6xfBh



Concrete solidarity: Strike grows in King County

The following is from Teamsters Local 174:

SEATTLE (Dec. 6, 2021) — As of Friday morning, unionized concrete has stopped flowing throughout King County as members of Teamsters Local 174 walked off the job in an Unfair Labor Practice strike. Prior to today, well over 100 Teamsters were already on strike at Gary Merlino Construction and Stoneway Concrete. That number now swells to over 300, as workers from Cadman, CalPortland, Salmon Bay Sand & Gravel, and Lehigh Cement stopped pouring concrete throughout the Puget Sound area.

The Unfair Labor Practice strike is the result of Employers’ failure to bargain in good faith for a new contract. After months of offers that dramatically undercut other construction trade union contracts, lead negotiator Charlie Oliver submitted another “Last, Best, and Final” offer to the Union that added mere pennies to the previous offer. This offer was not made in good faith, and was resoundingly rejected by the Teamster membership. Instead, the group decided to walk off the job until the Employers decide to negotiate in “good faith.”

Now that the Teamsters are on strike, the clock is ticking on all construction going on in King County. Without concrete, the impact of this strike will be strongly felt throughout the region.

International Brotherhood of Teamsters General President Elect Sean O’Brien visited the Stoneway Concrete picket line last week to show his support.

“Our members have had enough of Charlie Oliver’s insults,” said Teamsters Local 174 Secretary-Treasurer Rick Hicks. “He seems to believe these workers exist solely for him to exploit and abuse, and that they can be replaced at a moment’s notice. Well, now is his chance to prove it, or he can come back to the bargaining table with a legitimate offer rather than more insults.”

“My message to the owners and managers of all these concrete companies is this: Charlie Oliver is not telling you the truth,” Hicks continued. “He has completely bungled these negotiations, to the point where concrete has now stopped flowing and all of us are losing money. Come back to the bargaining table and let’s get a deal so we can all get back to work and enjoy the holiday season.”

Founded in 1909, Teamsters Local 174 represents 8,600 working men and women in Seattle and the surrounding areas. See more pics from the Stoneway Concrete/Gary Merlino Construction picket lines at Teamsters 174’s Facebook page.

 

Short URLhttps://www.thestand.org/?p=104159





USA

The Strike Wave Shows the Tight Labor Market Is Ready to Pop

Kellogg's workers in four states are among the recent wave of strikers. They're fighting against a company effort to dramatically worsen the two-tier system in their plants. Photo: Jim West, jimwestphoto.com.

This is a joint publication with The Intercept.

Labor Notes |

Shortly before midnight on Wednesday, production workers at a John Deere facility in Waterloo, Iowa, started shutting down the plant, quenching the furnaces in the foundry. The plant was already mostly empty, with Deere telling overnight workers to stay home. Three days earlier, union members at United Auto Workers meetings in Iowa, Illinois, and Kansas had voted overwhelmingly to reject a proposed contract that gave subinflation raises and eliminated pensions for all new hires. The rejection came as a surprise to both the union leadership and the company; even some of the workers who had voted no and authorized a strike were surprised that it was actually happening. The 10,000 workers who walked off the job are striking Deere for the first time in 35 years.

They join 2,000 hospital workers striking in Buffalo, New York; 1,400 production workers for Kellogg’s in four states; 450 steelworkers in Huntington, West Virginia; and a one-day walk-off of 2,000 telecommunications workers in California, all since October 1. One thousand Alabama coal miners700 nurses in Massachusetts, 400 whiskeymakers in Kentucky, and 200 bus drivers in Reno, Nevada, were already on strike, in addition to recently settled strikes by 2,000 carpenters in Washington, 600 Frito-Lay workers in Kansas, and 1,000 Nabisco factory workers at five plants across the country.

And there are tens of thousands of workers waiting in the wings, with 37,000 health care workers at Kaiser in Oregon, California, and Hawaii, who have either authorized a strike or are about to as well as several large unions of academic workers also readying to strike. More than 60,000 film and television workers were prepared to walk out, with 90 percent of Theatrical Stage Employees (IATSE) members voting 98 percent to strike, before a tentative contract was reached on Saturday; a vote on whether to ratify that contract will be held in the next several weeks.

INCREASING MILITANCY

This strike wave isn’t the 1940s, when one in 10 U.S. workers went on strike in the space of a year. But it isn’t the labor lull of the 2010s, either, when large strike activity in the private sector fell toward zero. Today, workers are increasingly militant—that is, unwilling to accept bad terms of employment—but they are not particularly organized. With union density at a historical nadir, the unions are playing an inspirational role, but they aren’t the only source of the action. What we’re seeing now is strike activity beginning to rise from a decadeslong trough as the “essential” worker—a new category of worker born of the coronavirus pandemic—challenges the boss to make good on that designation.

It’s not just workers taking note of the potential power shift; Wall Street analysts also sounded the alarm on Deere’s stock price this week, with one analyst downgrading projections by 25 percent. In a section of a proprietary report titled “Pendulum of Power Has Swung,” the analyst wrote: “Members, in addition to wanting concessions from Deere regarding a new 6-yr labor agreement, could also be tying these negotiations in with their desire to change how UAW national leadership is elected, and a broader national (and if global) enhanced activism by labor as they see their increasing power in a tight labor market.”

The woebegone small business owner who can’t attract workers has been one of the media’s favorite protagonists of the Build Back Better era, partly as cover for the Fortune 100 CEOs like Deere’s John C. May who benefit from the same low-wage labor market. But that tight labor market, a problem from the perspective of employers, has a mirror image in the eyes of those workers who never left the workplace: the “essential” and “front-line” and “hero” workers. Inside the workplace, workers across all industries, from transit to health care to logistics to food manufacturing, are beset by understaffing, which leads to forced overtime and burnout. In slaughterhouses, nursing homes, and countless other worksites, Covid-19 gave a new intensity to the existing landscape of occupational hazard: In 2020, nursing assistant became the most dangerous job in America.

’THE FUTURE’S NOT FOR SALE’

Workers are also feeling the heat of the past year’s market basket inflation. Kaiser’s 1 percent raise offer (on top of the introduction of an average 26 percent wage cut for all new hires) becomes a wage cut against a 5 percent consumer goods inflation. The 15-cent-per-hour raise Electrical Workers (IBEW) construction workers are getting in Orlando, Florida, doesn’t come close to keeping up with the rising cost of living. Kellogg’s proposal includes cutting the cost-of-living adjustment, which was once a central part of collective bargaining in core industries but which never came back for Big Three auto workers after the 2008 financial crisis and auto bankruptcies. Core to several of these strikes—Deere, Kellogg’s, and Kaiser—is a revolt against the 1980s-era introduction of “two-tier” contracts that provide worse conditions for new hires. As Bakery Workers (BCTGM) Local 3G president and Kellogg’s strike leader Trevor Bidelman told Labor Notes, “The future’s not for sale.”

In the case of Deere, workers are well aware of the company’s record profits and aren’t moved by what amounts to a $1-per-hour wage increase for most of them. The members have long self-organized into a Facebook group called “Post ’97,” meaning employees hired after 1997, with worse wages, benefits, and pensions. The current contract for most “post-’97” workers would be a 6-cent raise from what “pre-’97” workers made 10 years ago. The company’s proposal to cut pensions for all new hires—creating a “post-’21” workforce—runs up against a moral opposition that aligns with a new economic playing field, causing many workers to tout as a core demand of the strike: “No third tier!”

But a tight labor market also means leverage for workers. Knowing that they’re harder to replace, individual workers become more likely to say no to bosses: Today, workers are quitting their jobs at the highest rate in decades—one of the most precise measures of their labor market power as individuals. Where workers are organized collectively into unions, tight labor markets lead to rising willingness to confront employers over the terms and conditions of employment, instead of just looking for a better deal elsewhere. In other words, the same forces making work intolerable for so many—not enough workers and too much work—are simultaneously preparing workers to fight back.

RELEASE VALVE

The end of a national mobilization also tends to release built-up pressures in the workplace. Workers who put up with suppressed wages or stressful working conditions during an emergency expect to see something change afterward. As Harold Meyerson recently observed, both 1919 and 1945-1946 saw massive strike waves as the world wars ended. In the 1945-1946 cycle, when more than 10 percent of American workers went on strike, events that could plausibly be called general strikes erupted in Stamford, Connecticut; Lancaster, Pennsylvania; Rochester, New York; Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and Oakland, California.

The release valve that may be opening now resumes an expansion of labor activity before the pandemic. The generation before the 2008 crisis had been marked by long-term stagnation of wages and decline in labor’s share of national income. Recoveries from recessions in the 1980s, 1990s, and 2000s took longer than in earlier years, and large numbers of workers got stranded in permanent underemployment or inactivity. These trends culminated in the Great Recession and its agonizing, protracted recovery. But unemployment finally fell below 4 percent in 2018, and that year and the next, a noticeable uptick in strike activity occurred—most notably in a massive teachers’ strike wave—when labor markets had finally recovered from the devastation that followed the 2008 financial crisis, but teachers’ wages had not.

SUPPORT LABOR NOTES

BECOME A MONTHLY DONOR

Give $10 a month or more and get our "Fight the Boss, Build the Union" T-shirt.

In terms of strike activity, the current private sector wave picks up where the teachers left off, after an interlude of relative inaction during the height of the pandemic. In 2020, moreover, teachers formed the first major group of workers to refuse to accept whatever terms the employer dictated for reopening the workplace. It is difficult to imagine teachers speaking out against returning to work in unsafe conditions as much as they did without the national wave of militant teachers’ strikes in the two preceding years. This resistance has now spread across the economy, in both organized and individual forms.

SHAPING THE POLITICAL AGENDA

Today, workers’ economic resistance—whether through organized strikes or in the refusal of dangerous, underpaid, and unappealing jobs—is shaping the political agenda. Many of the policies in the Democrats’ $3.5 trillion budget proposal would pursue the same ends as workers’ actions but in the realm of social policy. Proposed subsidies for home health care and child care, the child tax credit, Medicaid expansion, and investments in housing and green energy would all indirectly support workers’ power. Either by increasing demand for labor further or by alleviating some of the grotesque social pressures that have forced employees to accept whatever terms employers offered them, the federal government would strengthen workers’ bargaining position. When Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va)., warns against becoming an “entitlement society,” what he is opposing is the shift in labor market power that such policy measures help secure.

The heightened interplay between industrial and political disputes marks a break with recent history. Through much of the last generation, even militant industrial action often bore little explicitly political significance. A major strike like the one at UPS in 1997 or Verizon in 2016 won gains for workers, but such events remained economic affairs. Politicians might feel compelled to comment on them—as former President Bill Clinton did about the UPS strike—but such disputes didn’t raise or settle any larger political question about the balance of power between the classes. (After providing a carefully neutral comment urging UPS and the Teamsters to settle, Clinton headed straight to Martha’s Vineyard.)

In the last several years, a number of mainstream Democrats have come to accept what had previously been a left-wing argument: that the increase of social inequality and the decline in working-class economic security is the ultimate cause of the destabilization of American democracy and must be taken head on. The stated position of the Biden administration is that “the decline of union density has … weakened our democracy.”

When organized labor is stronger, widespread dissatisfaction takes a more coordinated form. With higher levels of union membership, organized workers’ militancy generates concentrated pressure on targeted firms and triggers dissension among employers. Some bosses start to squirm and seek to calm labor down by agreeing to progressive social reforms, while others insist on holding the line. Those caught in the middle, like salaried employees at Deere, may largely sympathize with the strikers while being forced to work through the strike despite a serious skills gap.

The lower level of workers’ organization today—the smaller size of the organized workforce compared to an angry but scattered mass—makes it more difficult to divide employers politically in this way. On the picket lines and on Capitol Hill, the political capacity of a shrunken labor movement is being tested. The more concrete gains workers win now in either arena, the more others among the unorganized millions will see the benefits of unity.

LABOR’S CHAMPION?

President Joe Biden styles himself as labor’s champion, aspiring to be “the most pro-union president you’ve ever seen.” Days before he launched his presidential campaign (using a Pittsburgh union hall for his stage), Biden appeared on the picket line of one of the major strikes of 2019, at the Stop & Shop grocery chain in New England. Recently, confronted with businesses having a hard time hiring staff, the president said, “Pay them more.”

But when asked to take sides, he’s stuck to official neutrality, his press secretary citing unspecified “legal reasons.” On Friday, when asked about the John Deere strike, he stated, obviously, “They have a right to strike. They have a right to demand higher wages. … I’m not getting into the negotiation.”

And the administration has allowed key pro-worker provisions in the American Rescue Plan Act to expire, such as subsidies for COBRA, which are particularly crucial for striking workers whose employers cut off health insurance. The Allegheny Technologies workers, part of the Steelworkers, who struck for five months this year had the benefit of federally subsidized COBRA; the UAW members currently striking John Deere, whose employer plans to cut them off their plans by October 27, will not. They would, however, be eligible for other subsidies, including heavily subsidized Obamacare plans, though that would entail changing plans and potentially medical networks.

Ultimately, the issue in dispute across these strikes is whether American workers can be muscled back into the punishing labor market conditions of the pandemic and the several decades that preceded Covid-19 that made the pandemic so brutal within the insecure and unequal American workplace. Will nonunion workers settle for low wages and dangerous conditions? Will union workers continue to ratify two-tier contracts with incremental givebacks to employers? When the U.S. worker “goes back” to work, what kind of economy will they be going back to?

This is precisely the same issue as the one roiling Capitol Hill right now: whether Congress’s role is to return us to a pre-pandemic status quo or to intervene on the side of a battered working class.

Jonah Furman is a staff writer and organizer at Labor Notes. Gabriel Winant is an assistant professor of history at the University of Chicago and the author of The Next Shift: The Fall of Industry and the Rise of Health Care in Rust Belt America.