Sunday, August 22, 2021

Hide and Seek: The Orphan Well Problem in America

The impact of orphan wells, both on the environment and on tightening budgets, is a growing concern in the industry. 

Boom times result in a vast uptick in wells drilled. 
In bust times, when companies disappear, the liability outlook for these probes gets murky and federal and state governments start looking for answers.

August 1, 2021
By Blake Wright
Journal of Petroleum Technology



Magnetic surveys are used to guide ground-based field research more effectively. In addition to location data that is not always precise, wells are often difficult to identify in the field due to being buried or concealed by vegetation. Source: National Energy Technology Laboratory.


It’s a problem as old as the industry itself. The initial oil rush in the late 1800s spread like wildfire through Pennsylvania, and by 1891 the state’s annual crude output had hit 31 million barrels, or 58% of the nation’s total oil production for that year. However, by the turn of the century the bloom was off the rose. Pennsylvania’s once-robust oil allure had been eclipsed by finds in Texas, California, and Oklahoma, each spawning its own regional oil booms. So why the history lesson? Because it’s important to understand the potential volume and impact of orphan wells in the US.

In the infancy of the industry, plugging-and-abandonment (P&A) techniques were crude at best, if anyone even went to the trouble. Worse still was the overall record keeping at the time. With oil booms around the country setting off races to harness as much black gold as possible, wells were being drilled at breakneck pace. Once these earliest wells were tapped of their commercial usefulness, operators moved on to the next. There was little-to-no oversight. No regulations. No standards. The result? Thousands, if not more, of scattered, undocumented wells.

“Back in the day, you have people drilling wells, and nobody’s keeping track of where the wells are drilled and who owns the wells,” said Daniel Raimi, fellow with Resource for the Future, an independent institution that conducts environmental, energy, and natural resource research. “The government’s not keeping track and has little to no regulation in place to ensure that operators safely decommission their assets at the end of their lives. As a result, you have wells that maybe produce for a couple of years, and then the owners walk away. Multiply that by a couple of hundred thousand and now you’ve got a problem.”

Today, there is plenty of oversight and regulation for the industry to leave abandoned wells in much better shape than those earliest probes. However, orphan wells are still a problem. To paint the clearest picture, it would be prudent to define what an orphan well is.

This is where we run into our first problem. Definitions can vary wildly from state to state and organization to organization. Some lump all abandoned, unplugged wells into their counts as orphan wells. Others count all idle wells. However, for the sake of clarity we will define orphan wells as those nonproducing, idle wells whose ownership is unknown. By that definition it is safe to say that many of the nation’s earliest wells fit that criteria.

In more modern times, orphans result from idle wells whose owner goes belly-up prior to any P&A work. In most of these cases, bonds are employed to help offset the cost of plugging these wells. However, while they vary state to state, most bonding minimums do not cover the full cost of abandonment and remediation, if needed.

According to the US Environmental Protection Agency, there are about 2 million unplugged, abandoned oil and gas wells scattered across the US. Other experts place the number higher; some believe it is lower. Some researchers believe as many as half of those could be orphan wells. A survey by the Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission in 2018 put the range of orphaned and idle wells at around 560,000 to 1.1 million. Again, abandoned doesn’t always mean orphaned. One fact that can be extrapolated from the data gathered to date is that no one knows for sure just how many orphaned wells are out there. But that is changing.


Documented and estimated undocumented orphaned oil and gas wells in the US. Source: Columbia University CGEP report.



The Hunt


Researchers like Natalie Pekney have dedicated about a decade’s worth of field work trying to locate, chronicle, and sample the potential hazards from the orphan wells across the US. Pekney is an environmental engineer with the US Department of Energy’s National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) who has conducted field work in Oklahoma, Kentucky, and Pennsylvania, her home state and in many ways ground zero for the orphan well issue. She and her team used aerial magnetic survey techniques to pinpoint potential orphan wells by identifying the metal well casings. A 2017 study of the Hillman State Park location, west of Pittsburgh in southwestern Pennsylvania, discovered more magnetic well readings than previously reported in the area’s well count database.

“We started doing this work at least 10 years ago,” said Pekney. “We had a team that was perfecting the approach of using aerial magnetic techniques for finding wells. They would fly the survey and then go out on the ground and check those locations to verify if there was or was not a well there. They were noticing sometimes at these wells they could see bubbling, or you could smell a strong hydrocarbon smell. So just anecdotally, one could assume that some of them were still leaking. Then we had a thought to go out and measure how much, so we’ve been doing the emissions measurements since 2015 or so.”

Over time, the lab released its magnetic well-location technology to the private sector, which now employs sensor-equipped drones for much of the survey work. Now the team focuses more on the methane-emissions work. The group was in the throes of conducting measurement studies in Kentucky when COVID-19 sidelined the effort.

“We’re just now making plans to go back there and try to complete that work,” said Pekney. “The same thing in New York. We had plans to go out there and we had to put those off because of the pandemic. We’re currently trying to start our fieldwork efforts back up now that a lot of the travel restrictions and such have been relaxed.”

Pekney said they really had no expectations of what they might find once they started tracking emissions. With no previously published data on the subject, they had nothing on which to base a guess. Ultimately, in the context of greenhouse gas emissions from all US oil and gas sources, estimated emissions from abandoned wells is but a fraction of the total. The Hillman State Park survey took samples from 31 wells (22 above ground, unplugged and nine buried). The average emissions rate for the aboveground wells was 0.70 kg of CH4 per well per day.

Methane emissions are also a hot topic in political circles. Methane has more the 80-times the warming power of carbon dioxide over the first 20 years after it reaches the atmosphere, making it public enemy number one in the fight against climate change and global warming.

“It’s not huge, but at the same time, it’s kind of a correctable problem in a sense because these wells, generally the high-emitting ones have not been plugged, and plugging is effective at eliminating or decreasing emissions,” said Pekney.

Over the course of the next few years, Pekney believes her group can assist states by helping with plugging prioritization—identifying the “super-emitters” and getting those dealt with first.


GPS-enabled computers assist researchers on the ground in finding and geolocating abandoned wells, such as the one pictured here. Source: NETL.



The Answer?


Both state and federal officials have been active in recent months regarding the plugging of orphan wells. Several bills are floating around at the federal level that would aim to put workers sidelined by the pandemic back to work plugging these wells.

Senator Michael Bennet’s (D-CO) The Oil and Gas Bonding Reform and Orphaned Well Remediation Act is aimed at cleaning up tens of thousands of orphaned wells across the nation and reforming the bonding system. The REGROW Act, sponsored by Senators Ben Ray Luján (D-NM) and Kevin Cramer (R-ND) would budget more than $4.6 billion to put skilled energy workers back to work cleaning up these sites, with the goal of plugging every documented orphan well in the country.

“Safety and environmental protection are top priorities for our industry, and we operate under strict standards and practices to ensure that American energy is produced responsibly from start to finish,” said Frank Macchiarola, American Petroleum Institute’s senior vice president of policy, economics, and regulatory affairs. “Our industry complies with all existing state and federal requirements for abandoned wells and reclaiming wells sites, and we will continue to support new efforts, like those outlined in the bipartisan REGROW Act, to plug these wells and further reduce methane emissions.”

Roughly $8 billion has been given out to states by the federal government for mine-reclamation projects over the past four decades. President Joe Biden’s recently announced $2.3-trillion infrastructure plan would earmark $16 billion toward the cleanup and plugging of old oil wells and mines, a significant step up in investment for orphan well remediation.

“Society is bearing a lot of the costs right now because of things like water pollution and methane emissions,” said Raimi. “That is costing all of us something. It’s just difficult to measure. There are some proposals at the federal level to inject dollars into state plugging programs. That’s a helpful first step, but it certainly doesn’t address the magnitude of the problem.

“From my perspective,” he continued, “the thing that would be most helpful is for us to have better information on which wells are most hazardous. Because with, let’s just say, a million orphaned wells, and 2.1 million unplugged abandoned wells, we must prioritize, and we can’t prioritize unless we know which wells pose the most risk to the environment and to public health.”

There is still a long road ahead for the solution to the orphan well problem, and with fresh bankruptcies during the past year due to the pandemic, the number of wells left to deal with continues to be a moving target. The energy transition could be both a sign for celebration and alarm. As assets exchange hands from bigger operators raising capital for greener projects to smaller, lower-cost producers, the new owners will look for every advantage to preserve the bottom line. That might include deferring abandonment work, because, frankly, there’s no money in that.

“At the very least, we’re in the tens of billions of dollars range,” said Raimi on the national tab for orphan well cleanup. “I don’t know what the ultimate number is going to be, and therefore we need more information. It’s possible that there are some orphaned wells out there that are not causing anybody any harm. They might be in the middle of prairie land, not leaking any methane, and not causing risk around water. Should we really spend $100,000 to plug a well like that? Probably not. But again, we don’t know which wells pose substantial risks and which don’t.”


Average plugging and restoration costs per well. Source: Columbia University CGEP report.


For Further Reading


Green Stimulus for Oil and Gas Workers: Considering a Major Federal Effort To Plug Orphaned and Abandoned Wells. 2020. Daniel Raimi, Neelesh Nerurkar, and Jason Bordoff, Columbia University CGEP.

Decommissioning Orphaned and Abandoned Oil and Gas Wells: New Estimates and Cost Drivers. 2021. Daniel Raimi, Alan J. Krupnick, Jhih-Shyang Shih, and Alexandra Thompson, ChemRXIV, Cambridge University Press.


Millions of Leaky and Abandoned Oil and Gas Wells Are Threatening Lives and the Climate

Biden’s Build Back Better agenda would cap them—while putting tens of thousands of people to work
.

July 26, 2021 Jeff Turrentine

An abandoned oil drilling project in the Allegheny National Forest in Pennsylvania, where companies have abandoned thousands of wells in and around the area, walking away from cleanup responsibilities that could cost the state tens of millions of dollars.

Andrew Rush/Pittsburgh Post-Gazette via AP

When a bipartisan group of senators was hammering out the details of a proposed national infrastructure package earlier this summer, compromise was inevitable.

But one aspect of the package required little to no compromise: the call to cap the millions of orphaned and abandoned oil and gas wells that currently pockmark the country, from Alaska to New York to New Mexico. Whether it’s through the bipartisan infrastructure deal that’s currently being negotiated or through additional, upcoming recovery legislation, tackling this problem is essential—not only because these wells are dangerous polluters but also because doing so would create thousands of jobs in the process.

Taken together, these wells are a major source of air and groundwater pollution, as they continue to leak toxic substances such as arsenic and methane even after they’re no longer operational. But they also represent an all-too-rare point of political consensus: Just about everyone, from the reddest of red-state Republicans to the bluest of blue-state Democrats, agrees that the wells pose a serious threat to public health, that they need to be properly sealed, and that doing so will create jobs while making us all safer, whether from pollution or climate change or both.

Here’s what you need to know about these dangerous relics of fossil fuel extraction.

Tell Congress to heed climate warnings and pass the Build Back Better agenda
TAKE ACTION

What are orphaned and abandoned wells?

Over the past hundred years, fossil fuel companies and some private landowners in the United States have drilled tens of millions of holes deep into the earth to extract oil and natural gas. When a well goes dry (as, ultimately, they all do), its operator moves on. “Orphaned” wells are those for which no former owner or operator can be located, while the term “abandoned well” typically refers to an unproductive well with a known owner/operator. In either case, the wells remain uncapped. They are essentially open holes in the ground that need to be cleaned and plugged with cement to stop their pollutants from escaping into the environment.

How many of them are there, and where are they located?


A recent investigation by Reuters estimates that the United States could have more than 3.2 million orphaned and abandoned wells. Some states have a few hundred; others have a few thousand. And some have a staggering number of them: Pennsylvania reportedly has more than 330,000 of these wells within its borders.

“Orphaned and abandoned oil and gas wells are located everywhere,” says NRDC senior advocate Joshua Axelrod. “They can be in the middle of a forest, in backyards, in farm fields, even under sidewalks and houses.” Basically, they are anywhere that oil and gas development has taken place—at sites of large-scale operation spread out over many acres as well as single-well outfits on tiny parcels of land.




Why are they so dangerous?

Simple: Because they leak. Among the chemicals that can seep out and contaminate air, soil, or groundwater are hydrogen sulfide, benzene, and arsenic. Even the smallest leaks can adversely affect the local environment if they go unaddressed or undetected for many years.

Most alarmingly, though, these wells emit a lot of methane, an odorless gas that can seep into nearby buildings (a home, school, or office, for example) and pose major health hazards. When concentrated in enclosed spaces—such as a basement or a bedroom, for instance—methane will take the place of oxygen in the lungs and can cause weakness, nausea, vomiting, and convulsions. Long-term methane poisoning can even be fatal. And methane, of course, doesn’t just make people sick: It’s also highly explosive. In 2017, two men were killed while installing a hot water heater in the basement of a home in Firestone, Colorado, that had been built adjacent to an oil and gas field. When the neighboring petroleum corporation restarted a well that had been dormant for a year, a damaged flowline filled the basement with gas, which ignited into a fireball that destroyed the house in an instant.


Hanson Rowe, a landowner who blames a leaky gas well on his Salyersville, Kentucky, property for health problems
Bryan Woolston/Reuters


What’s the connection to climate change?

Though carbon dioxide emissions are easily the largest contributor to climate change in terms of volume, methane—the second-largest contributor—is actually 86 times more potent at trapping greenhouse gases over the first 20 years of its release into the atmosphere. In other words, small amounts of atmospheric methane can have the same heat-trapping power as much, much larger amounts of CO2.

According to the Reuters investigation, which conducted a comprehensive review of the available data in 2020, orphaned and abandoned wells in the United States were collectively responsible for emitting 281,000 tons of methane into the atmosphere in 2018. The report states that the collective methane release is “the climate-damage equivalent of consuming about 16 million barrels of crude oil,” which is nearly as much oil as the United States uses in a typical day. “Plugging orphaned and abandoned wells,” says Axelrod, “would lead to a measurable decrease in methane emissions and help us meet our climate goals.”

Why haven’t the fossil fuel companies that are responsible addressed this problem on their own?


It can cost anywhere between $10,000 and $50,000 to effectively seal off an older well, and as much as $300,000 to seal off a newer, deeper one. And while oil and gas companies are legally obligated to plug their wells, the economics of the industry—combined with lax regulation by states—means that few of these operators have the cash on hand or the incentive to adequately do their duty. It’s also not uncommon for oil companies to go bankrupt, leaving them with no means of cleaning up the physical ruin that they’ve created along the way to their own financial ruin.

In either case, the responsibility of remediation almost always ends up falling to the states, many of which are cash-strapped themselves. In May, the House Natural Resources Committee introduced a bill that would incentivize states to strengthen their own regulations by tying funding to these efforts. Still, at best, this would only solve the problem going forward, not address the cleanup of the backlog of three million wells.


Nathan Graber of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation hiking through the fog to find abandoned oil wells in Olean, New York
Lindsay DeDario/Reuters

How many U.S. jobs could a nationwide well remediation plan create?


“A lot,” says Axelrod. “The number depends on the size of the plan and the investment made. But a fairly middle-of-the-road estimate for the number of jobs that could be created if all orphaned and abandoned wells were to be located and plugged is on the order of 100,000 jobs per year for the next seven years.”

The infrastructure package proposed as part of President Biden’s Build Back Better agenda calls for $16 billion in funding to securely cap these wells (and also to close up abandoned mines, the coal industry’s version of this problem). Biden has made a point to stress that this nationwide program would create more union jobs with good wages. Many of the jobs would go to former oil and gas industry employees who have been laid off as a result of the pandemic and who would be arriving at their new work effectively pre-trained, with a basic understanding of the mechanics and technologies involved in the capping process. The president has also said that these workers would get paid “the same price that they would charge to dig those wells.”

Now that’s progress.



Tell Interior Sec. Haaland to help end destructive fossil fuel extraction
TAKE ACTION

NRDC.org stories are available for online republication by news media outlets or nonprofits under these conditions: The writer(s) must be credited with a byline; you must note prominently that the story was originally published by NRDC.org and link to the original; the story cannot be edited (beyond simple things such as time and place elements, style, and grammar); you can’t resell the story in any form or grant republishing rights to other outlets; you can’t republish our material wholesale or automatically—you need to select stories individually; you can't republish the photos or graphics on our site without specific permission; you should drop us a note to let us know when you’ve used one of our stories.








Cost Comparison Between Carbon-Neutral Fuel and Alternative Low-Carbon Energy Options

This paper examines potential new options for the petroleum sector to contribute to emission reductions and the climate debate.

August 17, 2021
HSE Now



The global climate-change discussion continues to search for ways to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases from their three main sources: the thermal generation of electric power, transportation by internal-combustion vehicles, and industries (petrochemical and others) that use coal-fired boilers or hydrocarbons as feedstock. This paper examines potential new options for the petroleum sector to contribute to emission reductions and the climate debate. One area could be the bringing to market of a carbon-free transportation fuel at affordable prices. A second could be the reduction of the carbon footprint of the power sector.

As other innovations have led to the use of natural gas instead of coal in power generation, and as consumers may increasingly switch to electrified motor vehicles, climate policy will increasingly require that electricity be decarbonized. This opens up a significant potential for the petroleum sector to use its existing skills to deploy carbon capture and storage techniques to the combustion of natural gas, thus delivering carbon-free fuel to the electric power sector.

A further use for natural gas is hydrogen generation, again with carbon capture and storage. This, in turn, could lead to the adoption of hydrogen fuel cells for future power generation and for transportation. This paper examines a wide range of studies from prominent institutions and researchers to show in quantified terms what may be the costs and feasibility of such a set of strategies.

The paper begins by presenting the nature of most greenhouse-gas emissions from the petroleum industry and contrasting their magnitudes and origins. The petroleum engineering skill set easily spans the technical challenges of geologic storage, and pore space requirements are estimated to compensate for combustion CO2 depending on whether the emissions come from coal, oil, or natural gas. The paper then briefly reviews the current technical information and technology readiness of carbon capture and storage.

Because transportation represents the largest fractions of the crude oil emissions, the paper considers the cost of capturing and storing an amount of CO2 equivalent to what will be emitted through exhaust pipes. Also noted is that hydrogen generated from natural gas represents an alternative carbon-neutral fuel.

Electrifying transportation offers a promising alternative to carbon-neutral fuels, provided the available electricity is decarbonized. The needs of ocean and air transportation cannot be fully addressed without onboard fuel, and, interestingly, biogenic products might provide this supply and substitute current hydrocarbon products.

A final discussion compares energy efficiency and life cycle analysis for internal-combustion vehicles, battery electric vehicles, and fuel-cell electric vehicles. Conclusions offer many potential leadership opportunities for the petroleum industry.

Download the complete paper from SPE’s Health, Safety, Environment, and Sustainability Technical Discipline page for free until 25 August.

Find paper SPE 201613 on OnePetro here.

 

Study suggests hydraulic fracturing can impact surface water quality

groundwater
Credit: Unsplash/CC0 Public Domain

Tens of thousands of hydraulic fracturing wells drilled over the past few years from Pennsylvania to Texas to North Dakota have made unconventional oil and gas production part of everyday life for many Americans. This raises questions about the impacts to local communities and human health. While some studies document that hydraulic fracturing can contaminate groundwater, new evidence shows the practice can also reduce surface water quality

The study, released today in the journal Science, finds  is associated with small increases in  in surface waters for several shales and many watersheds across the United States. The largest impacts occurred during the early phases of production when wells generate large amounts of flowback and produced . However, even the highest levels were well below what the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency considers harmful.

"Our work provides the first large-sample evidence showing that hydraulic fracturing is related to the quality of nearby  for several U.S. shales," says Christian Leuz, a co-author of the study and the Joseph Sondheimer Professor of International Economics, Finance and Accounting at the University of Chicago's Booth School of Business. "Though we estimated very small water impact, one has to consider that most measurements were taken in rivers or streams and that the average fracturing well in our dataset was not particularly close to the monitors in the watershed."

Leuz and his co-authors, Pietro Bonetti from the University of Navarra and Giovanna Michelon from the University of Bristol, combined surface water measurements with more than 46,000 hydraulic fracturing wells to examine whether new drilling and development activities are associated with elevated salt concentrations (bromide, chloride, barium and strontium) in 408 watersheds over an eleven-year period. They found a very small but consistent increase in barium, chloride and strontium, but not bromide, in watersheds with new hydraulic fracturing wells.

Several findings support the connection between the elevated salt levels and the nearby hydraulic fracturing activities. Along with the timing of when the highest levels occurred, the salt concentrations were also more pronounced for wells in areas where the deep formations exhibited higher levels of salinity. Additionally, they were highest when observed within a year at monitoring stations that were within 15 kilometers and (likely) downstream from a well.

"Better and more frequent water measurement is needed to fully understand the surface water impact of unconventional oil and gas development," says Bonetti, who notes that a lack of water quality data limited their analysis.

Hydraulic fracturing fluids contain  that are potentially more dangerous than salts. But they're not widely included in public databases, making a large-sample statistical analysis of these possibly hazardous substances infeasible. Also, many monitoring stations in a watershed are not located close to wells or may be upstream from the well, likely depressing the magnitude of the estimates.

"Policymakers could consider more targeted water measurement," Michelon says. "For instance, policymakers could place monitoring stations in locations where they can better track surface water impacts, increase the frequency of measurement around the time new wells are drilled, and more systematically track the other chemical substances found in fracking fluids."

Water used for hydraulic fracturing varies widely across United States
More information: Large-sample evidence on the impact of unconventional oil and gas development on surface waters, Science (2021). DOI: 10.1126/science.aaz2185
Journal information: Science 
Provided by University of Chicago 

Fracking linked to surface water quality for first time in new study
BY SHARON UDASIN - 08/19/21 0

© Getty Images

The effects of fracking on nearby water sources may be worse than previously thought, according to a new study that found hydraulic fracturing can alter the composition of surface water and not just groundwater.

The study, published Thursday in Science, is the first to link fracking to small increases in salt concentrations in surface water, particularly during the early stages of production. While the highest salt levels were well below what the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) considers harmful, researchers identified a robust association between new wells and water quality changes, triggering public health concerns.

“Our work provides the first large-scale sample evidence showing that hydraulic fracturing is related to the quality of nearby surface waters for several U.S. shales,” Christian Leuz, co-author of the study and a professor at the University of Chicago’s Booth School of Business, said in a news release.


The authors analyzed almost 61,000 surface water measurements that had been taken from 2006 to 2016 near about 46,000 hydraulic fracturing wells across 408 watersheds. They investigated the presence of bromide, chloride, strontium and barium, the ions most common in high concentrations in frack “flowback” — the fluid that returns to the surface following fracking operations. Their findings indicated a small but consistent increase in barium, chloride and strontium, but not in bromide.

While Leuz acknowledged that the concentrations might not be alarming at face value, he warned that measurements taken in rivers are susceptible to considerable dilution. In addition, monitors are sometimes situated a couple miles downstream from a fracking site and across entire watersheds — which can be almost as big as a county, he added.

By averaging data from all the wells throughout such expansive spaces, some of which showed impacts and others of which did not, the researchers ended up with these smaller, but still statistically significant, salt concentrations, according to Leuz.

Higher concentrations of barium in drinking water can lead to increases in blood pressure, while chloride can increase water conductivity — the ability of water to conduct electricity — and lead to unpleasant tasting water, as well as potential threats to aquatic life, according to the U.S. Geological Survey.

Elevated strontium levels can have adverse impacts on bone development.


“They’re not innocuous either,” Leuz told The Hill.

The study identified the highest salt concentrations during the early phases of oil and gas production, when wells generate the most flowback. The researchers also saw higher levels at monitoring stations that were located within 10 miles and downstream from a well, and in measurements taken within a year of the fracking activity.

Co-author Pietro Bonetti, from the University of Navarra in Spain, emphasized the need for more frequent water samples to fully understand the surface water impact, in the news release that accompanied the study. A third co-author, Giovanna Michelon from the University of Bristol in England, called on policymakers to “consider more targeted water measurements” in strategically placed locations.

The three co-authors, who are all economists, became interested in the impacts of hydraulic fracturing on water quality while investigating the ramifications of mandatory chemical disclosure rules that several states — like Wyoming, Pennsylvania and New York — had instituted for hydraulic fracturing operators in 2010. But they first needed to establish a relationship between fracking and surface water quality, which was not yet available, so they implemented their own statistical analysis.

The researchers will conclude a followup study on the effects of disclosure rules in about another month, but Leuz said “the current results suggest that practices became cleaner and had less impact.”

The authors expressed optimism that their statistical approach could be applicable to other fracking chemicals that are even more dangerous than elevated salt levels — but that are rarely included in public databases. For example, recently unearthed documents indicated that the EPA approved the use of fluids that contain toxic forever chemicals.

Orlando mayor says COVID-19 surge has sparked liquid oxygen shortage...
Labor shortages slam into rebounding tourism in Maine

If the EPA were to conduct regular measurements on such toxic chemicals and make that data available, Leuz said that he and his colleagues could easily run the same statistical analysis on those compounds.

“We could do this for any substance,” he said. “You give me any relevant chemical, and we could apply this approach.”

Updated: 2:54 p.m.
SNC-Lavalin completes closing of Resources Oil & Gas business 


NEWS PROVIDED BY
SNC-Lavalin
Aug 16, 2021

MONTREAL, Aug. 16, 2021 /CNW Telbec/ - SNC-Lavalin (TSX: SNC), a fully integrated professional services and project management company with offices around the world, today announces that it has completed the closing of the sale of its Resources Oil & Gas business on August 15, following receipt of Saudi Arabian regulatory approval.

SNC-Lavalin previously announced that it had closed the sale of a substantial portion of its Resources Oil & Gas business on July 29, pursuant to its binding agreement with Kentech Corporate Holdings Limited ("Kentech") announced on February 9, 2021. The Company indicated it expected full closing to be completed by the end of Q3 2021.

"The closing of the sale of all activities related to our Resources Oil & Gas business allows us to focus our ongoing efforts on executing our strategic direction announced more than two years ago," said Ian L. Edwards, President and CEO, SNC-Lavalin Group Inc. "Our business is now realigned on growing our high potential core Engineering Services, which includes the Engineering, Design & Project Management, Nuclear and Infrastructure Services segments."

"We look forward to working closely with our employees, suppliers and clients to develop innovative solutions to engineer a better future for our planet and its people. I would like to thank all the Resources Oil & Gas employees for their dedication and hard work over the years, and wish them much success with Kentech,'' added Mr. Edwards.

As previously announced, the transaction is expected to generate a non-cash gain on the sale in excess of the fair value write down, after accounting for the elimination of foreign exchange cumulative translation adjustments included in the historical carrying amounts of the disposed Oil & Gas business.

SNC-Lavalin Closes Sale of Substantial Portion of Resources Oil & Gas Business 

Français
NEWS PROVIDED BY
SNC-Lavalin
Jul 30, 2021, 


MONTREAL, July 30, 2021 /CNW Telbec/ - SNC-Lavalin (TSX: SNC), a fully integrated professional services and project management company with offices around the world, today announces that it has closed the sale of a substantial portion of its Resources Oil & Gas business on July 29, pursuant to the previously announced binding agreement with Kentech Corporate Holdings Limited ("Kentech") dated February 9, 2021.

The balance of closing, which constitutes the Saudi Arabian portion of the business, is expected to be completed by the end of Q3 2021 following the anticipated receipt of standard Saudi Arabian regulatory approval. This part of the business represents approximately a quarter of the Resources Oil & Gas business' total annual revenues.

"The substantial close of the sale of the Resources Oil & Gas business marks another important step in our journey that began two years ago, when we first announced our strategic initiative to simplify and de-risk our business," said Ian Edwards, President and CEO, SNC-Lavalin Group Inc. "We have now realigned our business to focus on growing our high potential core Engineering Services, which includes the Engineering, Design & Project Management, Nuclear and Infrastructure Services segments."

"We look forward to working closely with our employees, suppliers and clients to develop innovative solutions to engineer a better future for our planet and its people. I would like to thank all the Resources Oil & Gas employees for their dedication and hard work over the years, and wish those already now part of Kentech much success going forward," added Mr. Edwards.

The transaction is expected to generate a non-cash gain on the sale in excess of the fair value write down, after accounting for the elimination of foreign exchange cumulative translation adjustments included in the historical carrying amounts of the disposed Oil & Gas business.

About SNC-Lavalin
Founded in 1911, SNC-Lavalin is a fully integrated professional services and project management company with offices around the world. SNC-Lavalin connects people, technology and data to help shape and deliver world-leading concepts and projects, while offering comprehensive innovative solutions across the asset lifecycle. Our expertise is wide-ranging — consulting & advisory, intelligent networks & cybersecurity, design & engineering, procurement, project & construction management, operations & maintenance, decommissioning and sustaining capital – and delivered to clients in four strategic sectors: EDPM (engineering, design and project management), Infrastructure, Nuclear and Resources, supported by Capital. People. Drive. Results. News and information are available at www.snclavalin.com or follow us on Twitter @SNCLavalin.

SOURCE SNC-Lavalin

For further information: Media: Harold Fortin, Senior Director, External Communications, 514-393-8000, poste 56127, media@snclavalin.com; Investors: Denis Jasmin, Vice President, Investor Relations, 514-393-8000 poste 57553, denis.jasmin@snclavalin.com
Related Links

www.snclavalin.com


Organization Profile



SNC-Lavalin

Founded in 1911, SNC-Lavalin (TSX: SNC) is one of the leading engineering and construction groups in the world and a major player in the ownership of infrastructure. From offices in over 40 countries, SNC-Lavalin’s 30,000 employees provide EPC and EPCM services to clients...


Also from this source


SNC-Lavalin completes closing of Resources Oil & Gas business...


SNC-Lavalin drives sector leadership in digital with new...


SNC-Lavalin Reports Second Quarter 2021 Results...
OIL INDUSTRY PRESS RELEASE
New study touts Gulf oil industry's contributions to U.S. economy

Keith Magill
The Courier

Gulf of Mexico oil and gas development supported 345,000 jobs in the U.S. and contributed $28.7 billion to the nation's economy in 2019, an new industry study estimates.

The study, released Thursday by the National Ocean Industries Association, says those numbers are projected to grw. But officials say whether that happens depends in large part on efforts by the Biden administration and other political leaders to reduce the pollution, rising seas and other ill effects greenhouse gasses from fossil fuels are wreaking on the planet.

"The Gulf of Mexico has transformed into a national strategic infrastructure asset, and we must make every effort to sustain it through a predictable regulatory system that includes regularly scheduled lease sales and continued permitting," association President Erik Milito said.

The study, "The Gulf of Mexico Oil & Gas Project Lifecycle: Building an American Energy & Economic Anchor," was conducted for the group by the consulting firm Energy and Industrial Advisory Partners.


The National Ocean Industries Association, whose 120 members include mostly offshore-oil-service companies, hopes the study will help inform ongoing debate over the nation's energy future, Milito said.


OPEC:Biden asks OPEC to increase oil output, but keeps domestic drilling ban in place

Oil advocates:'A win for the entire country': Louisiana oil advocates celebrate decision on moratorium

A federal judge granted the state's request in June to temporarily halt President Joe Biden's ban on new oil lease sales in the Gulf.



However, Milito said, so far the Biden administration has taken no steps to restart the twice-a-year lease sales that seek bids from companies interested in exploring for oil in the Gulf. Lawyers for the state, led by Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry, have filed motions asking the judge to force the Biden administration to schedule the lease sales.

Milito and other industry officials contend that limiting U.S. drilling will encourage more oil production in foreign countries and higher greenhouse gas emissions.

"President Biden should fulfill his legal obligation to schedule and hold offshore oil and gas lease sales and abandon the shortsighted leasing pause," Milito said. "As long as Americans depend upon oil and gas for modern life, it must come from somewhere, and it is clearly better to get oil and gas here at home than from a foreign state with weak environmental safeguards."

One of the key points the study makes clear is that the ban, though it did not stop companies that already have leases from drilling, is still impacting jobs and spending, Milito said. That's because activity starts long before companies even bid on Gulf leases.

The typical deepwater project takes about 30 years from start to finish, the study says. Throughout that lifecycle, the project results in about $8.8 billion in spending and $3 billion in direct wages. An average of 1,435 people are directly employed by the project over that time, along with another 2,200 indirect jobs.

On a single deepwater project, about 80 people are directly involved in the first two years of planning and preparation, jobs that include engineers, attorneys, data scientists, geologists and others, the report says.

With Gulf lease sales in limbo, much of that activity is on hold, Milito said.

Among other study highlights:

More than 200 different job titles are involved in the typical deepwater project in the Gulf.

The average wage for the Gulf oil industry, $69,650 a year, is 29% higher than the national average.

Every U.S. state has jobs and investments tied to the Gulf oil industry.

Throughout its 30-year lifecycle, a typical deepwater project supports about 3,640 direct and indirect jobs combined. But the number of jobs varies greatly over the project's various stages, peaking at 14,500 during the most active years.

"Offshore energy projects are capital and labor intensive," he said. "It's all the different types of economic activities throughout throughout the country. There is little appreciation for the fact that this industry builds a city in the middle of the ocean, in the middle of the Gulf of Mexico, and they maintain that city for 30 years. And that city requires billions of dollars of investment and thousands upon thousands of workers throughout the life of that of that project."



U.S. Economic Recovery Hinges on Oil & Gas Industry: Study

America’s natural gas and oil industry will need to serve as a vital driver of the nation’s post-pandemic economic recovery, according to a new study.

The industry counts as critical to every sector of the U.S. economy and supports millions of jobs across all 50 states, says a study by PricewaterhouseCoopers that compiles the latest available government data.

The 134-page study, which explores the economic impact of the oil and natural gas industry, found that the business supported 11.3 million jobs and contributed nearly $1.7 trillion to the U.S. economy in 2019.

The study authors reported that the impacts are the result of three channels:

​•​ Direct impacts from the employment and production within the oil and natural gas industry.
​•​ Indirect impacts through the industry’s purchases of intermediate and capital goods from a variety of other U.S. industries.
​•​ Induced impacts from the personal purchases of employees and business owners both within the oil and natural gas industry and its supply chain, as well as from the personal spending by shareholders out of the dividends received from oil and natural gas companies.

In addition to supporting well-paying jobs, the natural gas and oil industry, directly and indirectly, contributed an estimated $1.7 trillion to the U.S. economy in 2019, representing 7.9 percent of the U.S. gross domestic product.

Researchers found through wages, taxes, capital investments, and support to other industries, the economic impact extends beyond traditional natural gas and oil-producing states.

“Every state in the nation has a stake in continued access to U.S. natural gas and oil reserves, which are critical for the nation’s economic recovery,” the study authors wrote.

In short, as the nation continues to recover from the pandemic and the economic downturn that resulted, the natural gas and oil industry will serve as an engine for long-term growth.

“The industry continues to create good-paying jobs and deliver reliable American energy to enterprises, including health care, retail, manufacturing, education and more, in communities across the nation,” researchers concluded.

According to the findings, in 2019, the natural gas and oil sector directly and indirectly:

​• ​Supported more than 11.3 million total jobs or 5.6 percent of total U.S. employment.
​•​ Generated an additional 3.5 jobs elsewhere in the U.S. economy for each direct job in the U.S. natural gas and oil industry.
​•​ Produced $892.7 billion in labor income, or 6.8 percent of the U.S. national labor income.
​•​ Supported nearly $1.7 trillion to U.S. gross domestic product, accounting for 7.9 percent of the national total.

The U.S. Energy Information Administration noted that global oil and liquid fuels consumption is expected to surpass 2019 levels in 2022, as economic activity and travel patterns normalize.

“This represents an opportunity for the U.S. to meet the world’s rising demand for affordable, reliable fuels with homegrown natural gas and oil,” American Petroleum Institute President and CEO Mike Sommers wrote in an email.

“That said, America’s economic outlook depends on federal and state policy proposals that incentivize resource development, modernize energy infrastructure and streamline burdensome regulations,” Sommers wrote. “The nation’s hard-fought energy security and GDP growth are at stake, even as the natural gas and oil industry continues to drive the nation’s post-pandemic recovery.

“As America’s economy comes back, the natural gas and oil industry will serve as the foundation for long-term growth and prosperity,” he said. “Every state across the country — both blue states and red states — rely on American energy to fuel each sector of the economy and support millions of U.S. jobs. This study reinforces that America’s economic outlook is brighter when we are leading the world in energy production, and it serves as a reminder of what’s at stake if policymakers restrict access to affordable, reliable energy and make us more dependent on foreign sources.”

Click here to view the full report.

API 

GREENWASHING BEFORE SHILLING
Legislators affirm commitment to Texas gas, oil industry while pushing for clean energy future

by Lindsey Carnett
August 18, 2021

U.S. Rep. Henry Cuellar (D-Texas) and Texas Sen. Roland Gutierrez (D-San Antonio) toured CPS Energy's Calaveras Power Station Wednesday. Credit: Scott Ball / San Antonio Report


Just days after Bexar County officials learned that the county will face new air quality regulatory requirements and intensified federal oversight, two legislators pledged their support to the oil and gas industry.

Following a private tour of CPS Energy’s Calaveras Power Station Wednesday, U.S. Rep. Henry Cuellar (D-Texas) and Texas Sen. Roland Gutierrez (D-San Antonio) said they are committed to protecting the state’s oil and gas jobs, but would also like to see Texas become a leader in clean energy.

The lawmakers fielded questions from reporters after their tour about the future of Texas’ grid and what they are doing to strengthen the state’s energy infrastructure. CPS Energy denied reporters’ requests to join the tour, citing short notice.

Cuellar and Gutierrez saw some of the $20 million worth of improvements CPS Energy made to its power plants following the deep freeze across Texas in 2011. That freeze almost caused the Electric Reliability Council of Texas to implement the rolling blackouts it enacted in February during Winter Storm Uri.

The utility has “already begun to address some weatherization measures that include additional heaters, temporary enclosures, and insulation” following February’s freeze, said Christine Patmon, a CPS Energy spokeswoman, but it is waiting for the Public Utility Commission of Texas to issue new standards.

“My concern is that we aren’t doing the things that we need to do at the state level,” Gutierrez said, “which is to increase capacity and … look to tying into the eastern and western grids of the United States.”

Gutierrez said he and Cuellar met with officials from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and the North American Electric Reliability Corporation while in Washington D.C. recently about that possibility.

The lawmakers said their focus on clean energy doesn’t mean they’re out to “attack” out to get the oil and gas industry.

The Trump administration was “very good at attacking Democrats” when it came to oil and gas, claiming they were “trying to kill all the jobs,” by promoting clean energy, Cuellar said. Cuellar said he and Gutierrez support the oil and gas industry because it sustains thousands of jobs in the state.

Allowing these jobs to remain means allowing oil and gas facilities to continue operating; allowing them to keep operating means allowing them to continue emitting ozone-forming emissions, a reporter pointed out. Ozone is a key ingredient of smog that irritates and damages the lungs and has been tied to chronic conditions such as asthma.

Because efforts to reduce smog and improve air quality locally over the past three years have been insufficient, Bexar County will be bumped from “marginal” to “moderate” ozone nonattainment likely in early 2022, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality officials said Monday.

The new designation means San Antonio will face new air quality regulatory requirements with intensified federal oversight. Despite state data showing CPS Energy’s power plants have lowered their emissions between 2014 to 2019, they are still among the top sources of ozone-forming emissions in the region.

Cuellar said that as a member of the Appropriations Committee, he’s “added millions and millions of dollars for technology” focused on clean energy goals such as carbon capture and storage, to further reduce emissions.

“Can we do better? Of course we can, and I’ve sat down with the energy folks and said, ‘Guys, we’ve got to do better,’” Cuellar said. “Hopefully when we do the big reconciliation, we look at clean energy. I’m hoping that natural gas can be part of that clean energy, but again, let’s do it in a way that we don’t attack the oil and gas industry.”

Gutierrez said he and Cuellar are not only focused on oil and gas though; they would like to see the state further diversify its energy sources. Texas is already a leader in wind energy, and has the potential to become one in solar energy as well, Gutierrez said.

Cuellar said he will continue to work with Gutierrez and his state counterparts to “modernize [the] electric grid,” and “build energy resilience” to keep Texans safe during extreme weather events. In a press release Wednesday, Cuellar boasted that he helped secure $100 million in Build Back Better Challenge Grant funds to go toward national power infrastructure and clean energy technologies.




LINDSEY CARNETT is the general assignment reporter for the San Antonio Report.



Oil and gas industry is on the decline in Texas. What does that mean for state’s future?



BY HALEY SAMSEL
AUGUST 12, 2021 



Play Video Duration 1:03
Sign of the times: See dozens of oil tankers off California coast as demand plummets
Dozens of oil tankers anchor off the Californian coast near Los Angeles and Long Beach as the reduced demand for oil takes hold. The tankers are acting as storage tanks for oil as demand has reduced throughout the coronavirus pandemic. 
Video: 4/23/20 BY U.S. COAST GUARD VIA STORYFUL


It’s no secret that the Texas oil and gas industry took a massive hit from the COVID-19 pandemic, leading to the loss of nearly 60,000 jobs last year. Trade groups have trumpeted the importance of supporting energy production as part of the state’s economic recovery plan, highlighting the $411 billion that oil and gas generated for Texas in 2019.

But a new independent report is challenging some of the tried and true wisdom that “what’s good for oil is good for Texas.” The analysis from the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis found that the oil and gas industry is responsible for 10 percent of the Texas gross domestic product, down from 21 percent in 1981.

While Texas oil and gas companies continue to dominate in refining and petrochemical production, their contributions to tax revenue, employment and overall economic growth across the state have been in decline for decades, according to report co-author Trey Cowan.

“What’s happened is that other industries are growing much faster than the oil and gas industry,” Cowan told the Star-Telegram. “Oil and gas has been replaced as far as contributions to the economy goes by services, which has taken its place as number one.”

The “services” industry includes professional and business services, computer systems, healthcare, food services, entertainment and educational services. Complementing Texas’ surge in population and employment, services industries account for 28 percent of Texas’ economic production — growing by 17 percent since the 1980s.

Oil and gas companies no longer provide the same tax revenues that could be expected 30 years ago, when the industry accounted for 28 percent of total revenue. That number has lingered beneath 10 percent for more than two decades, according to Cowan’s analysis.

Cowan hopes the report will draw attention to Texas’ economic realities and other “red flags” facing the industry, including growing competition from foreign producers and the disruption caused by renewable technologies, including solar, wind and electric.

Policymakers need to “recognize the potential risks of continuing to buoy an industry that faces” unprecedented challenges, he said.

“We’re trying to address that misconception that oil and gas is the be all, end all for Texas,” Cowan said. “If we start looking at all these other industries that are contributing to the growth of Texas, maybe we can come up with an economic development plan for the future so that we don’t see communities suffer like coal communities like in West Virginia or Kentucky.”



Cowan and environmental advocates like Virginia Palacios, who runs a nonprofit organization urging reforms at the Railroad Commission, are concerned about the futures of communities reliant on oil and gas jobs.

Where drilling jobs once boomed and producers paid high percentages of property taxes, hotels housing oilfield workers are vacant, Palacios said.

“State leaders have a chance to invest in these shale communities and diversify their economies,” Palacios wrote in the San Antonio Express-News. “This shift in investment requires acknowledging oil and gas are in decline.”

Oil and gas advocates have produced their own reports in an effort to persuade Texas lawmakers to continue their support for the industry. Just last month, the Texas Oil and Gas Association and the American Petroleum Institute released a data analysis showing that their industries directly and indirectly supported more than 2.5 million jobs across the state in 2019.

“As America’s economy comes back, the natural gas and oil industry will serve as the foundation for long-term growth and prosperity in Texas,” Mike Sommers, president and CEO of the institute, said.

He added that the industry study serves as a reminder of what’s at stake if “policymakers restrict access to affordable, reliable energy and make us more dependent on foreign sources.”

Cowan’s report, which draws different conclusions from government datasets, isn’t meant to knock the oil and gas industry, he said. Instead, Cowan wants his research to be used to spur action that will prevent the downfall of communities dependent on oil and gas jobs.

Detailed plans have been produced for towns affected by military base closures, and Cowan envisions similar blueprints for rural areas to pivot to other industries and strengthen their tax bases in the process.

“Oil and gas is going to be a much smaller piece of the pie going forward,” Cowan said. “People need to measure how they conduct themselves as far as policies that they’re setting for the next several years based on that reality instead of basing it on some myths about what used to be.”

A new independent report is challenging some of the tried and true wisdom that “what’s good for oil is good for Texas.”
 JOYCE MARSHALL TNS



HALEY SAMSEL
covers environmental issues across North Texas for the Fort Worth Star-Telegram. Her position is supported by Report for America and a grant from the Anita Berry Martin Memorial Fund at North Texas Community Foundation. Samsel grew up in Plano and graduated from American University in Washington, D.C., where she served as the editor-in-chief of the student newspaper, The Eagle. A shortlist of her interests include the Mavs, K-pop and stand-up comedy.




Australia risks taking the wrong tack at Glasgow climate talks

When the world tries to agree on a response to climate change in Glasgow Australia's only power is to set an example, not be the slowest follower.


THE CONVERSATION
17 AUG 2021 


Buried within the prime minister’s response to the latest report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change is just about everything we’re at risk of getting wrong at the Glasgow climate talks in October.

After slamming China — whose emissions per person are half of Australia’s — for not doing more to cut emissions, Scott Morrison said the Glasgow talks were the “biggest multilateral global negotiation the world has ever known”.

If he treats the talks as just another (big) negotiation, we’re in trouble.

The way the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade usually treats negotiations is to hold something back, hold out the prospect of “giving it up,” and then only make the concession if the other side gives something in return. Even if holding back damages Australia.

Cars are a case in point. From an economic point of view, there is no reason whatsoever to continue to impose tariffs (special taxes) on the import of cars — none, not even in the eyes of those who support the use of tariffs to protect Australian jobs. Australia no longer makes cars.

Yet the tariff remains, at 5%, making it perhaps A$1 billion harder than it should be for Australians to buy new cars (although nowhere near as hard as it was in the days when the tariff was 57.5%).

The tariff seems to be in place largely to give the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade something to negotiate away in trade agreements: for use as what the Productivity Commission calls “negotiating coin”.

Here’s how it worked in the 2014 Australia-Korea Free Trade Agreement. Australia agreed to remove the remaining 5% tariff on Korean cars, “with consumers and businesses to benefit from downward pressure on import prices”.

But Australia didn’t remove the tariff on car imports altogether, which would have given us a much bigger benefit but denied the department negotiating coin.

The next year the department did it again, agreeing to give up the tariff on imported Japanese cars in the Japan-Australia Economic Partnership Agreement (but not on other cars) so Australians could “benefit from lower prices and/or greater availability of Japanese products”.

Two years later, it did it again, with cars from China.

When the UK and European agreements are negotiated, it’ll do it there too.
Australia holds back reforms

Eventually, Australians will get what they are entitled to. But the point is that rather than advancing the cause of free trade, the department has held back, treating a win for the other side as a loss for us, when it wasn’t.

The Centre for International Economics believes the much bigger earlier set of tariff cuts lifted the living standard of the average Australian family by A$8,448.

Had our trade negotiators been in charge, we would still be waiting. Instead, the Hawke and then the Keating governments pushed through unilateral reductions, asking for nothing in return.




As former Trade Minister Craig Emerson put it, this gave Australia “credibility in international trade negotiations way beyond the relative size of our economy”.

Does that sound like the sort of thing Australia might need at Glasgow, to have enough credibility to urge even bigger emitters to deliver the kind of cuts on which our futures and future temperatures depend?
It won’t work with China

The prime minister is right to say that China is the world’s biggest greenhouse gas emitter, even though its emissions per person are low. Its high population means it accounts for 28% of all the greenhouse gases pumped out each year. The next biggest emitter, the United States, accounts for 15%

But China’s status is new. Until 2006 it pumped out less per year than the United States. Because the US has had mega-factories and heating and so on for so much longer, it is responsible for by far the biggest chunk of the greenhouse gasses already in the atmosphere: 25%, followed by the European Union with 22%.



China might reasonably feel that countries like the US that have done the most to create the problem should do the most to fix it.

Like Australia, the US pumps out twice as much per person as China and has much more room to cut back.

On the bright side, China knows that being big means it is in a position to make a difference to global emissions in a way that other countries cannot on their own. And that’s a position that can benefit its citizens.

China’s latest five-year plan, adopted in March, commits it to cut its “carbon intensity” (emissions per unit of GDP) by 18%. If it beats that five-year target by just a bit (and it has beaten its previous five-year targets) its emissions will turn down from 2025.

It is aiming for net-zero emissions by 2060.
Australia needs China’s help

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change finds that Australia is especially susceptible to global warming. We’re facing less rain in winter, longer heatwaves, drier rivers, more arid soil and worse droughts.

We are right to want China to do more, but the worst way to achieve it is to say “we won’t lift our ambition until you lift yours”.

Hardly ever a worthwhile strategy, it is particularly ineffective when we don’t have bargaining power.





The only power we’ve got is to set an example, unilaterally, as we did with tariffs. And to ramp up our ambition.

If Australia said it would do more, and didn’t quibble, it might just count for something.

It’s all we can do, and it’s the very best we can do.

Peter Martin, Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.


Main image: Bushfires below Stacks Bluff, Tasmania. Source: Matt Palmer on Unsplash