Showing posts sorted by date for query DON GETTY. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query DON GETTY. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Wednesday, August 26, 2026

Hind Rajab’s Family Says Israel’s Investigation Into Hind’s Death Just a PR Ploy

“Even now, all I hear is her crying, ‘I’m scared,’ and her plea: ‘Come here, Mama, take me,’” Hind’s mother said.
August 21, 2026

The grandmother of Hind Rajab holds a mobile phone displaying a picture of Hind on August 20, 2026.Omar AL-QATTAA / AFP via Getty Images

Hind Rajab’s mother has dismissed the Israeli military’s announcement this week that it is opening a supposed criminal investigation into the killing of her 5-year-old daughter, saying that it is nothing more than a PR move meant to distract from Israel’s ongoing genocide in Gaza.

“Why did the investigation and the acknowledgment of the shooting at Hind’s car and at the paramedics come only after more than two years?” Wesam Hamada, Hind’s mother, told the Associated Press on Friday. “It’s an attempt to distract from what’s happening in Gaza and improve the [Israeli] army’s image to the world. That’s it.”

On Wednesday, Israel’s military acknowledged that its soldiers played a role in the horrific series of events in January 2024, in which Hind, her 15-year-old cousin, and five members of their family were killed.

The military admitted to the slaughter of her adult family members, but did not take responsibility for the killing of Hind or her cousin Layan Hamada specifically, despite numerous independent investigations finding that they were shot by Israeli soldiers in a tank. Israeli soldiers have been found to be targeting children in Gaza, often with gunshots to the head, countless other times since Hind’s killing.

“I don’t trust the Israeli authorities, I don’t trust their government, and I don’t trust any justice system they have,” Hind’s mother said in an interview with NBC. “I don’t want an investigation used to whitewash anyone’s image.”


After Years of Denial, Israel Finally Admits to Role in Killing of Hind Rajab
Israel has maintained a PR campaign for years, supported by the US, denying its soldiers’ role in the brutal killing. By Sharon Zhang , Truthout  August 19, 2026


Hind’s grandmother, who is also named Hind Rajab, similarly dismissed the investigation. “For us this is not an admission but rather an attempt by the Israeli army to justify to the world how it committed the crime and how they executed Hind,” she told AFP. “The army is trying to justify its position to the world, claiming that what happened was a mistake and that the soldiers who committed it will be prosecuted.”

An Israeli tank sprayed the car carrying Hind and her family members with hundreds of bullets, despite having a clear line of sight to the children inside, an investigation by Forensic Architecture found.

After her family was killed, Hind remained trapped in the car with their bodies for hours, a tank looming nearby, as Palestinian Red Crescent workers waited for the Israeli military to give clearance for them to rescue her. In those hours, she spoke with rescuers and her mother on the phone. Recordings from the Palestinian Red Crescent documented the terrifying last hours of the little girl’s life before she was gunned down.

“I’m so scared, please come. Please call someone to come and take me,” Hind said to emergency dispatchers.

Rajab noted that Israel only acknowledged Hind’s killing because her harrowing phone call to rescuers became so widely known, pointing out that there are many other similarly horrific killings that Israel will never follow up on.

Hind’s family still mourns her death.

“She died with the most heartbreaking sound I’ve ever heard,” Hamada told NBC. “Even now, all I hear is her crying, ‘I’m scared,’ and her plea: ‘Come here, Mama, take me.’”

Hamada has demanded an independent investigation that will actually lead to answers. “I want to know who killed my daughter, who killed my family members, and who killed the paramedics who went to rescue her. Who gave the orders? Who fired the shots?”

 Islam Beyond Phobia

Hind Rajab, the 5-year-old killed in Gaza, should have been enough

(RNS) — Hind Rajab was killed while pleading for help in a car with her six dead relatives. On Wednesday (Aug. 19), the Israeli military acknowledged for the first time its firing on the car. 
Hind Rajab. (Photo courtesy of Palestine Red Crescent Society)

(RNS) — One child. Five years old. Trapped inside a car in Gaza City surrounded by the bodies of her dead relatives, pleading into a telephone for someone to come save her.

“Come take me. Please, will you come?”

The world heard Hind Rajab’s voice. We heard her fear. We knew rescuers were trying to reach her. The Palestine Red Crescent Society dispatched two paramedics after coordinating their passage to reach her.

They never reached Hind.

Twelve days later, Hind was found dead in the bullet-riddled car alongside six members of her family. The two paramedics were found dead in their destroyed ambulance roughly 50 meters away. A subsequent forensic investigation, conducted in collaboration with Al Jazeera, mapped 335 bullet holes in the family’s vehicle and concluded that the damage to the ambulance was consistent with Israeli munitions and that Israeli military vehicles were nearby.

On Wednesday (Aug. 19), more than two and a half years after she was killed, the Israeli military acknowledged that its troops had fired on the car and announced a criminal investigation into the family and medical workers’ deaths. The announcement comes after the military initially denied that its forces were even present near the vehicles or within firing range. The Hind Rajab Foundation, which has pursued the case internationally, dismissed the investigation as an attempt to create the appearance of accountability after years of impunity.

But there is a question before the question of whether this investigation will produce justice. That is: Why did we need thousands more dead children before Hind’s death was treated as something worthy of accountability?

Hind should have been enough because one child should always be enough.



The Quran teaches that “whoever unjustly takes a single life, it is as though he has killed all of humanity, and whoever saves one life, it is as though he has saved all of humanity.”

I have reflected on that verse countless times during these years of mass death. God does not allow us to hide the individual inside the statistic.

One life contains a world. One child contains a world. One terrified little girl waiting for an ambulance should contain enough humanity to stop armies, move governments and awaken consciences.

Instead, Hind became one name among thousands. Her story was later dramatized into the award-winning film “The Voice of Hind Rajab,” which moved audiences to tears with the audio of Hind pleading for rescue. The film received a lengthy standing ovation at its Venice Film Festival premiere and won the festival’s Grand Jury Prize.

The emotional response was overwhelming — but it also raised a harder question: If we needed a film to feel what was already happening in real time, what does that say about what we ignored? And if we had to make a film for every Palestinian child, or stand and pray a funeral (janaza) prayer for every one of them, would the world still be able to function, still be able to look away?

UNICEF reported that as of Feb. 3 of this year, at least 21,289 Palestinian children had been killed in Gaza since October 2023. Even after what the world called a ceasefire, Palestinian children continued to die. This month, UNICEF reported at least 300 children were killed during the 300 days following the ceasefire announcement in October 2025.

Bodies of members of the Hassayna and Abu Sharia families, killed in an Israeli strike in 2023 and recently recovered from the rubble, are draped in Palestinian flags during their funeral in Gaza City, Tuesday, Aug. 4, 2026. (AP Photo/Jehad Alshrafi)

One child a day, even after a ceasefire was announced.

What does it say about us that Hind was not enough?

There is another Quranic passage I cannot stop thinking about when I think of Hind.

In describing the Day of Judgment, God paints a haunting scene: “And when the girl-child that was buried alive is asked for what sin she was killed.”

The verse is striking because God does not ask the murderer first. He asks the murdered child. The girl whose life society decided was disposable is brought forward before all of creation. The crime that people normalized on Earth becomes an indictment before God.

For what crime was she killed?

I imagine Hind being asked that question.

What was your crime, Hind?

Was it being Palestinian? Was it being born in Gaza? Was it sitting in a car? Was it surviving the bullets that killed the people around you? Was it asking someone to come get you?

There is no military justification that can make that question disappear. No internal investigation can bury it. No press release can answer it. Criminals can’t investigate themselves or issue statements to make it better.

One day, Hind herself gets to put her criminals on trial before God. But will we also be on trial for indifference? 

Hind Rajab should have been enough.



And accountability has certainly not been enough. It is not merely whether a soldier is disciplined or a government publishes an investigation. Accountability means believing that no victim disappears simply because the powerful have moved on.

The Quran’s insistence on the value of a single life is especially necessary in an age of mass death because numbers can become their own form of anesthesia.

Twenty thousand children. Two hundred journalists. Thousands of amputees.

Eventually, the human mind protects itself by turning people into arithmetic.

But Hind was not arithmetic.

She had a voice. We heard it. She was afraid. We heard that too. She waited for adults to save her. And we know how the story ended.

The question now is not merely whether the Israeli military can credibly investigate itself. Human rights organizations and journalists will rightly scrutinize that process. Israel’s record gives ample reason for skepticism. The more important question for the rest of us is why the killing of one little girl was not enough to force a moral reckoning in the first place.

If Hind had been enough, perhaps thousands of children would be alive.

The Quran does not say whoever kills thousands has killed humanity. It says whoever kills one. It also says whoever saves one life, it’s as if they’ve saved all of humanity. So perhaps that’s what we can now hold onto.

Saving another child from Hind’s fate should be enough to keep acting.

Because God knows something about us that we repeatedly forget: Once we permit ourselves to explain away the destruction of one innocent life, we have already crossed the moral boundary that makes the next one easier to explain away.

And when the girl who waited in that car is finally asked, “For what crime were you killed?” the rest of us should fear the questions that will be asked of those who heard her voice and still allowed thousands of children to follow her.


As a Palestinian From Gaza, I Can Study Abroad in Safety, But Never Visit Home

Our ability to study in safety is tied to a feeling of being emotionally trapped, for we are unable to return home.
August 22, 2026

Palestinian youths stand and swim along a rocky breakwater on the Mediterranean coast in Gaza City, on July 4, 2026.Ahmed Younis / Middle East Images / AFP via Getty Images

Since Israel’s war began in Gaza, Palestinian university students have seen their education and futures upended. All universities have been damaged or destroyed, campuses have closed, and around 88,000 students have been deprived of access to higher education, according to Palestinian officials. Friends of Palestinian Universities has reported that nearly 1,400 university students have also been killed.

For some students, obtaining a scholarship abroad is no longer a privilege to have; it is a necessity to reclaim a future interrupted by war. Many European countries and universities have opened their doors for those students, with scholarships and programs offering a chance for survival. Many Palestinians have managed to leave Gaza, but this comes with another kind of suffering: They can study in safety abroad, yet cannot return home to their families.

I paid that price when I left home.

I was evacuated from Gaza to Italy in December 2025 after the war destroyed my university and all of my city. I was fortunate to receive a scholarship that allowed me to continue my bachelor’s degree in Italy. I am safe here, and I have a place to rebuild my future. However, my family is still in Gaza.

This is my first summer away from my homeland. I live in an apartment with international students. In the past weeks, I watched them pack their stuff and book tickets to go home. I watched them leaving in excitement to see their families and friends after an exhausting academic year. But I had to stay behind.


For Gaza’s Students, International Scholarships Offer Both Hope and Heartbreak
This academic year, for the first time, Italy extended university scholarships to more than 180 students from Gaza.  By Sara Awad , Truthout February 14, 2026


I was afraid to experience that moment, and I wasn’t ready to see my own pain reflected so visibly in front of me.

Leaving Gaza never looked like taking a plane from one country to another. It was more complex, more complicated. Palestinian students do not simply buy a ticket and travel to their destination. They walk into authority proceedings that feel impossible to schedule in a short while. Gaza’s borders are totally controlled by Israel and there is no way to leave Gaza as before through the Rafah border, as Israel has imposed a total blockade on the borders.

Special humanitarian corridors have to be created by the host country, students face visa issues and travel restrictions, and agreements between the governments and Israeli authorities determine whether they can leave from Gaza. Every step has to align before the scholars can leave. And they leave with nothing but phones and identification documents.

These elaborate processes offered a way out but with no promise for a way back in. Freedom was given to us to leave, but something seems hollow about an idea of freedom that means one cannot return home.


Voices From Abroad



Many Palestinian students have been given a chance to continue their path elsewhere in Europe and beyond. Some made it to Ireland, others to France, as well as Spain and other countries. Those students each experience new lifestyles, new language, faces, and unfamiliar surroundings. But we all have the same painful reality of separation from our own family.

I spoke with three students who are living through the same contradictions as I am, but in a very different place and environment. I wanted to understand how this pain weighs on each of us.

Their pain is different but we all share the same trauma of war.

In Ireland, Abubaker Abed, 24, is a journalist and football reporter and commentator from Dair Al Balah, Gaza Strip. He left behind the life he had built in Gaza, along with the places, people and memories he was deeply attached to, in order to save whatever remained of his future.

“It hurts me that I haven’t seen my family for a year and a half. I feel so much pain,” Abed told me

.
Abubaker Abed is a Palestinian student from Gaza now in Ireland after surviving Gaza’s war in 2025.Sara Awad

He does not dream of returning to Gaza for only a holiday or a brief visit. He dreams of going home for good — to sit with his family in their own home, to live beside them without a screen or a border between them, and to feel safe together.

Abed’s suffering is not limited to the summer holiday. He is constantly reminded of his painful circumstances when he sees the freedom of movement enjoyed by other students. “I feel jealous when a colleague mentions a gathering of his family while I cannot even see mine,” he mentioned.

Abed wishes that all Palestinian students from Gaza might one day experience the full freedom of going back home whenever they need or wish. “We came from a traumatized state; we want our families alongside us,” he said.

Meanwhile, Ola Saed, who won a scholarship to pursue a master’s degree in international communication at Sciences Po Toulouse in France, describes how difficult it is to spend the summer doing nothing but working simply to keep herself busy.

“I feel very bad when the student accommodation is empty and quiet. I feel like I’ve lost the meaning of home,” Saed told me. “I did not leave — I was uprooted from my land.”

But there is another reality that many students face: They left with a scholarship, but the scholarship does not last forever. At some point, the funding, the university program, and the accommodation will end. One student facing this reality is Saja Hijaze, 23, a business and management student at the University of Jaén in Spain. She left Gaza through a six-month program that ended last month.

“All my colleagues packed their bags to go home. I stayed behind, facing a new and uncertain future,” Hijaze said through tears.


“I don’t have the desire to visit cities in Spain. I want to go to Gaza so much, even if all I find there is rubble.”

She longs to return to Gaza, to reconnect with the people she loves and regain a sense of home, safety, and familiarity. “I don’t have the desire to visit cities in Spain. I want to go to Gaza so much, even if all I find there is rubble,” Hijaze said.

The experience of separation from Gaza has taken a mental and emotional toll on all of us. Seeking professional support, including therapy, is one of the few things we can do to help ourselves navigate the weight of separation, loss, and uncertainty.

I spoke with Dr. Nouhaila Faida, a Moroccan-Italian psychologist who volunteers to support students from Gaza now studying and living alone in Europe. She described the ways prolonged separation from family, uncertainty about the future, and the experience of rebuilding a life far from home can affect students.

“Summer, which should be a time of rest, can instead deepen their isolation. Our first task is to give them an anchor — a safe space where they can be heard, their pain validated and their sense of connection rebuilt,” Faida said.

According to Tomaso Montanari, rector of the University for Foreigners of Siena in Italy and a supporter of Palestinian students from Gaza, “In Italy, even summer might be harder for Palestinian students.”

Montanari pointed out that the universities in Italy are not designed as residential communities. “In Italy, unlike in the United States or other countries, universities are not built around the college model: they generally do not have common spaces or permanent student residences,” Tomaso said.

These summer months feel particularly harsh for us. We are constantly reminded that we cannot enjoy them like how others do. Even visiting another city can feel offensive when our families are living through such a horrific situation back home.

Palestinian students from Gaza like me did not leave because we wanted a new home or a new country; we only wanted to have a future. But having a future should not come with the price of permanent separation from the people who are the meaning of life.

We were evacuated as students, but we did not leave Gaza as ordinary travelers, for we cannot return home.
Legendary TV Comedy Writer Explains ‘Existential’ Threat of Paramount-Warner Bros. Merger

“We know what this merger will mean—one less buyer for our work, less demand for writing services, less leverage to negotiate deal terms that recognize our value, less creative latitude.”



An aerial view of the Paramount logo on the water tower at Paramount Studios on February 23, 2026 in Los Angeles, California.
(Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)


Brad Reed
Aug 24, 2026
COMMON DREAMS


Top TV comedy writer Michael Schur, co-creator of hit shows such as Parks and Rec and The Good Place, is sounding the alarm about the “existential” dangers of allowing the proposed $110 billion megamerger between Paramount and Warner Bros. Discovery to go through.

In an op-ed published Monday in The Hollywood Reporter, Schur outlined the downsides of megamergers between major Hollywood studios, which he described as “bad for everyone except those at the very top” and “another potential broadsword blow to an already wounded industry, one that’s been gouged and squeezed and strangled by high-level corporate greed.”

Focusing on the challenges faced by writers, Schur wrote that people in his profession “felt the walls closing in” when they first heard news of Paramount’s proposed purchase of Warner Bros.

“We know what this merger will mean,” wrote Schur, “one less buyer for our work, less demand for writing services, less leverage to negotiate deal terms that recognize our value, less creative latitude... The impact will be concrete, measurable, and serious.”

Schur explained that writers and other workers in the entertainment industry personally understand how corporate consolidation affects their livelihoods.

“We don’t have to theorize any of these outcomes,” Schur wrote. “Disney’s acquisition of 21st Century Fox in 2019 put them all on full display. After the merger, Fox’s television development operation was folded into Disney’s. Their studio’s priorities continued, Fox’s did not. Writers who had built relationships at Fox found themselves adrift... More than 4,000 Fox employees lost their jobs.”

Schur concluded by encouraging opponents to the merger to “fight tooth and nail to sustain what is left of our struggling—but still breathing—creative industry” before it gets fully monopolized.

The combination of Paramount and Warner Bros. has long been controversial because it would put control of CBS, CNN, HBO, TikTok, and other major media properties all under the control of David Ellison, the son of billionaire Larry Ellison, a major donor to President Donald Trump.

The merger has been placed on hold amid multiple lawsuits seeking to block it, including one filed by 12 Democratic state attorneys general.

The New York Times reported on Monday that California Attorney General Rob Bonta, whose office has been leading the state AGs’ antitrust complaint against the deal, called off a meeting that had been scheduled with Paramount executives to discuss a potential settlement.

In a statement, Bonta accused Paramount of leaking misleading information about settlement discussions between the parties, which he said demonstrated “a lack of good faith.”

“As soon as Paramount stops playing games and engages sincerely,” Bonta said, “my office is happy to meet again.”
Trump's trade threats spiral out of control as Canada slaps down 100 pages of tariffs

David Edwards
August 25, 2026 
RAW STORY


FILE PHOTO: Canada’s Prime Minister Mark Carney speaks with the news media after he suspended trade negotiations with the United States, in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada August 22, 2026. REUTERS/Chris Tanouye/File Photo

President Donald Trump spent Tuesday morning threatening Canada online while Ottawa put a nearly 100-page tariff schedule on the calendar he cannot stop.

Four Canadian cabinet ministers announced the retaliatory tariffs in Ottawa on Tuesday, according to the New York Times. The duties cover about 700 American products and take effect Sept. 8.

The rates range from 15 to 50 percent, matching the level Washington set for each product, according to CNBC. Prime Minister Mark Carney had promised a "dollar for dollar" response after talks collapsed Friday night, the Times reported.

The schedule runs nearly 100 pages, Global News senior journalist Mackenzie Gray reported on X. It taxes fish, stoves, carpets, men's suits and fishing rods.

"Our preference was to find a deal that benefits both countries," Canadian trade minister Dominic LeBlanc told CNBC's "Squawk Box" on Tuesday. "We still believe that's possible. But in the meantime, we're not waiting by the phone."

Trump answered on Truth Social, where he suggested halting business with Ontario and repeatedly floated renaming Lake Ontario to "Lake America," CNBC reported.

"I deal with many countries, and Canada is easily the most difficult and unreasonable," Trump wrote in one post.

Trump warned Monday that he would double tariffs on Canadian cars and auto parts to 50 percent, but not until Jan. 1, 2027, Global News reported. Canada's deadline is two weeks away.

Canada doubled its own tariffs on American steel and aluminum to 50 percent, the Times reported. Ottawa added $7.5 billion for businesses and workers harmed by the trade war, according to CNBC.

Senior Canadian officials said the list was not built to punish particular American businesses or states, but to help Canadian industry, Gray reported.

Trump has also complained that the United States runs a trade deficit with Canada. That gap exists largely because Americans buy Canadian crude oil, CNBC reported.

His tariffs have excluded oil, natural gas, potash and many minerals, according to the Times.

Polls taken before the tariffs took effect Saturday showed broad Canadian support for retaliation, the Times noted. Ontario Premier Doug Ford has pressed for it, while Alberta Premier Danielle Smith has urged restraint.

Canada's economy is about one-twelfth the size of the American economy, according to the Times, and economists say the resulting price increases will hurt Canadian companies, too.


‘Canada Must Respond’: Ottawa Slaps Retaliatory Tariffs on US Goods After Trump Trade War Escalation

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said his nation is not “going to accept” an “attitude at the negotiation table that Canada is a subsidiary of the United States.”



Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney speaks about the trade dispute with the United States at the Davie Shipyard in Levis, Quebec, Canada on August 24, 2026.
(Photo by Andrej Ivanov/AFP via Getty Images)

Brett Wilkins
Aug 25, 2026
COMMON DREAMS


Canada announced Tuesday that it will impose roughly $20 billion in retaliatory tariffs on American imports in response to President Donald Trump’s 50% tariff on many of its goods after bilateral negotiations collapsed amid what Ottawa said were last-minute concessions that damaged the Canadian economy and intruded on its sovereignty.

The government of center-left Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said its countermeasures will cover roughly C$27.6 billion ($20 billion) worth of American products, with tariffs ranging from 15% to 50% on hundreds of categories including steel, aluminum, appliances, clothing, seafood, electronics, furniture, and dairy. The measures are scheduled to take effect September 8. Ottawa also unveiled billions of dollars in assistance for workers and businesses expected to be hurt by the conflict.


‘It’s War’: Trump’s 50% Tariffs Take Hold After US-Canada Trade Talks Collapse


“Canada must respond, and today we are, in a proportionate, targeted, and strategic way,” Canadian Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne said during a press conference in Ottawa. “Today I’m announcing that Canada will match the United States tariffs dollar for dollar, rate for rate.”

“Canada’s counter-tariffs are designed primarily to provide protection for Canadian industry impacted by US tariffs and allow them to compete against US products in the Canadian market,” he added. “It’s all about fairness, it’s all about a level playing field, it’s all about supporting Canadian workers and Canadian businesses.”

It’s also apparently about political calculation ahead of November’s midterm elections, in which the congressional balance of power—and therefore Trump’s ability to pursue his agenda—is at stake.

The administration’s trade war with Canada is hitting industries concentrated in states where Republicans are fighting to defend vulnerable US Senate seats, including Maine’s lobster industry and Michigan’s auto sector, while Ohio and other Midwestern states face exposure via cross-border manufacturing and supply chains.



On Monday, Trump told Canadian leaders to “fall in line” or face “far WORSE” consequences than the new tariffs.

Carney retorted that Canadians are not “going to accept” an “attitude at the negotiation table that Canada is a subsidiary of the United States.”

Canadian anger toward Trump has surged as the US president has repeatedly threatened Canada’s sovereignty, including his frequent talk of making Canada the “51st state.” Canadian political leaders and labor organizations have largely rallied behind a tougher response, while a growing grassroots boycott of US products has become a symbol of national resistance.

“Canadians understand that maintaining our sovereignty and independence will entail consequences and sacrifices,” Calgary-based commentator Jen Gerson wrote Tuesday in The Guardian. “We did not bring this trade war on ourselves; we have merely refused to comply in advance to the unreasonable demands of a bad-faith actor. We will be punished for it. We have accepted this.”

“If nothing else, let the [United States’] retaliation be a warning to the rest of the Western alliance,” Gerson added. “Run, run. Protect yourselves. Move faster.”

Trump—the self-proclaimed “peace president” who has attacked more countries than any other US leader in modern history—has menaced a string of allies. He’s threatened to retake the Panama Canal, launch armed attacks on Colombia and Mexico, “bomb the shit” out of Oman, and take over Greenland.

Longtime US allies have taken notice—and action. Just as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine spooked Sweden and Finland into the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, Trump’s erratic aggression has pushed other countries in directions once thought highly unlikely. European Union membership for Iceland, long a politically moribund proposition, is now politically plausible amid developments including Trump’s Arctic saber-rattling. US tariff pressure on India is even incentivizing India to seek closer economic ties with China, a traditional adversary.

Trump’s increasingly aggressive and condescending rhetoric has left many Canadians feeling like their relationship with their southern neighbor has irreparably changed.

“America has changed, and... we will not return to our old relationship,” Carney said after Trump announced the 50% tariffs over the weekend.

“You’re at war when you get attacked,” the prime minister also said. “We got attacked.”

Such rhetoric was once the realm of comedy, like the 1995 satirical film Canadian Bacon, directed by Michael Moore and starring John Candy and Dan Aykroyd, about a struggling US president who manufactures a shooting war with Canada, invasion and all, in hopes of rallying Americans around a foreign enemy.

The premise was absurd because the notion of Washington deliberately provoking its peaceful northern neighbor into war seemed preposterous. Many critics have noted that under Trump, absurdity has become the new normal.

On Tuesday, Trump said he’s considering changing the name of Lake Ontario to “Lake America,” because, as one Bluesky account noted, “Trump likes to slap the name of America on everything.”



“Gulf of Mexico? Gulf of America. Strait of Hormuz? Strait of America. Lake Ontario? Lake America,” the account quipped, adding one more suggestion: “Epstein Island? America Island.”


Trump roasted as 'greatest idiot' in a lifetime after Lake Ontario threat: 'Out of ideas'

Alexander Willis
August 25, 2026 
RAW STORY

President Donald Trump floated the idea of changing the name of Lake Ontario to “Lake America” on Tuesday amid his ongoing trade feud with Canada, a pitch that was met with collective sighs by critics who spoke to their exhaustion with the chaotic Trump administration.

In a post on his social media platform Truth Social, Trump claimed that his administration was “giving serious consideration” to the name change as he did not “expect to [be] doing much business with Ontario any longer.” The idea is similar to his executive order issued in early 2025 to rename the Gulf of Mexico to the “Gulf of America,” a move that received intense scrutiny at the time.

Regarding Trump’s latest name-change idea — one that came amid Trump imposing 50% tariffs on some Canadian goods, and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney vowing to match said tariffs “dollar for dollar” — critics were quick to condemn it.

The Bulwark's Sam Stein quipped on X, "He's out of ideas."

Stephen Hayes, editor and CEO at The Dispatch, mocked, "It's still astonishing - ten years into the Trump era - that our president so often behaves like a 10 year-old. And that so much of our national policymaking is based on the juvenile emoting of an adult who functions like a preteen."

“We are living in the stupidest f------ times,” wrote Jason Willan, a prominent fantasy sports analyst, in a social media post on X.

Roland Ley, a former contributor for Euromaidan Press, called Trump the “greatest idiot” he had witnessed in his “lifetime.”

“Just as internationally 'Gulf of America' isn't recognised, this won't be either,” Ley wrote in a social media post on X. “Not even passed by the US Senate anyway.”

In response to Trump’s announcement, Canadian horse-racing photographer Julie Wright quipped, “Lunatic says what,” and prominent online influencer Mario Nawfal argued that Trump’s trade war was “getting silly” in a post on X to his more than 3.8 million followers.

“It would require a lot more than a President’s bad mood to change the name of a gulf or great lake!” Nawfal wrote. “Maybe a vote or something a bit more thought out.”


'Sounds like me': Trump confesses to CNN that he torpedoed trade talks with Canada

Robert Davis
August 25, 2026 
RAW STORY


U.S. President Donald Trump welcomes Canada's Prime Minister Mark Carney at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., October 7, 2025. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein/File Photo

President Donald Trump admitted on Tuesday that he caused the intensifying trade war between the U.S. and Canada after he added conditions to the talks at the 11th hour.

Trump spoke briefly with CNN's Jim Sciutto after Canada announced retaliatory tariffs on a bevy of U.S. goods. During the call, Sciutto asked about Canadian officials' assertion that late-stage demands were inserted into the negotiations, and the president's response was eerily surprising.

Sciutto shared a snippet of the conversation on X.

“That sounds like me,” Trump told the reporter.

“So you don't deny it?” Sciutto responded.

The president replied, “No, no, I don't deny anything. So no, they have to pay a fair amount. And if they don't pay a fair amount, we won't make a deal. That's fine.“

The exchange stunned some of the president's critics.

"At least he admitted it. LOL. Clown show operation," Dean Blundell, a Canadian comedian, posted on X.

"How Donald Trump is sending America's manufacturing economy to the brink of the abyss," Grant Stern, executive editor for Occupy Democrats, posted on X.


CNN's Daniel Dale smacks Trump with a stinging fact-check after latest Canada flop

Erik De La Garza
August 25, 2026
RAW STORY



U.S. President Donald Trump points a finger as he speaks during a roundtable on antifa, an anti-fascist movement he designated a domestic "terrorist organization" via executive order on September 22, at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., October 8, 2025. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein

President Donald Trump repeated another series of false claims about Canada as his escalating trade war with the United States’ northern neighbor erupted again this week, according to a brutal CNN fact-check.

CNN’s Daniel Dale examined two social media posts Trump published Monday, beginning with the president’s claim that “Canada’s Unemployment Rate is now at 10%, and rapidly rising.”

“This is wrong on both counts,” Dale wrote Tuesday.

“Canada’s unemployment rate declined to 6.4% in July. That was the third consecutive month it had gone down,” Dale told readers. “It was also a two-year low.”

The rate would be approximately one percentage point lower if Canada calculated unemployment using the same methodology as the United States, Dale noted. The U.S. unemployment rate was 4.1% in July.

Trump’s claim that Canada conducts “95% of their business with the U.S” also came under the microscope.

“There’s no doubt that the Canadian economy is heavily reliant on the US, but there’s no apparent basis for Trump’s '95%' figure,” Dale found. According to his report, approximately 72% of Canadian merchandise exports went to the United States in 2025, down from roughly 76% the previous year and the lowest percentage since the early 1980s.

“And the figure fell below 70% in the first half of 2026,” Dale added.

While Dale acknowledged that the United States is less dependent on Canada than Canada is on the U.S., he stressed that Canada remains a critical trading partner, particularly for northern border states.

Trump just made toilet paper a lot more expensive


President Donald Trump meets with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, Tuesday, May 6, 2025, in the Oval Office. (Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok/Flickr)

August 26, 2026 
ALTERNET

After U.S. President Donald Trump threatened Canada with new 50 percent tariffs, Canada responded with retaliatory tariffs of their own on Tuesday. Tariffs on some Canadian goods imported into the United States, the Associated Press (AP) reports, could be as high as 50 percent. And according to The Guardian, Americans could face higher prices for paper products like toilet paper, facial tissues and paper towels as a result.

"Using the bathroom or having a cry is about to become more expensive for North Americans as the U.S. and Canada enter a full-fledged trade war that threatens to flush away decades of peaceful trading between the two nations," journalist Lauren Aratani reports in The Guardian. "After trade negotiations broke down between the two countries last weekend, Mark Carney, the Canadian prime minister, vowed to match U.S. tariffs 'dollar for dollar' and unveiled a list of nearly 900 American goods that will face 25 percent to 50 percent tariffs starting on 8 September."

Many economists, both liberal and conservative, have been warning that a trade war with Canada could cost U.S. homeowners a fortune — as many building and construction materials are imported into the U.S. from Canada. And according to a Canadian government website, "Canada's counter tariffs will apply to products covering $27.6 billion in imports from the U.S. and will focus on sectors such as steel, dairy, appliances, agricultural equipment, pulp and paper, and electronics, that are most impacted by U.S. tariffs."

Aratani emphasizes that "paper products are among the hardest-hit sectors, with Canada threatening to put tariffs of between 25 percent and 50 percent on 'toilet paper or face tissue stock' from 8 September in retaliation for a 50 percent hike from Washington DC."

"Though American toilet paper and tissues are often made domestically," Aratani explains, "they heavily rely on lumber-rich Canada for raw materials. Procter & Gamble, the owner of Charmin toilet paper, said last year that it would have to increase prices amid tariffs that were in place at the time. The U.S. imported $328m worth of toilet paper from Canada in 2024, according to the World Bank, making it by far the largest exporter of the product to the U.S. Retailers including Costco source much of their paper products from the country."

The Guardian reporter continues, "The U.S. accounts for more than 20 percent of global tissue consumption despite having only 4 percent of the world's population. The average American uses 141 rolls of toilet paper per year, making them No. 1 for No. 2s globally, just ahead of Germans, each using an average of 134 rolls annually."


‘The Red States, We’re Going to Hit Hard’: Canadian Politicians Vow to Make MAGA Pay for Trump’s Trade War

“We can put massive pain on the US,” said Ontario Premier Doug Ford.



Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney speaks about the trade dispute with the United States at the Davie Shipyard in Levis, Quebec, Canada on August 24, 2026.
(Photo by Andrej Ivanov/AFP via Getty Images)

Brad Reed
Aug 24, 2026
COMMON DREAMS

Politicians from Canada’s two biggest political parties vowed on Monday to hit back hard against US President Donald Trump’s trade war against their country.

Trade negotiations between the two countries collapsed last week after Trump reportedly sought to restrict Canada from striking trade deals with other nations, while also pressuring the country to scrap requirements aimed at preserving the use of the French language.

Speaking to reporters on Monday, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney warned that Trump’s aggression would come back to hurt US workers.

“It’s not a surprise that the US would take some form of reprisal to our response to their unjustified tariffs,” said Carney, a member of the center-left Liberal Party. “But what message does that send to the workers in Michigan and Ohio and Kentucky and Alabama who rely on Canadian demand? We’re their largest customer for automobiles, more than the European Union, Japan, Korea.”



Carney also said there was an “attitude at the negotiating table” from US officials that “Canada is a subsidiary of the United States,” which is “not something we’re going to accept.”

Ontario Premier Doug Ford, a member of the rival center-right Progressive Conservative Party, delivered a more strident rebuke to Trump, vowing that Canada’s response would deliver a hit to the president’s voters.

“The red states, we’re going to hit hard,” said Ford.

The Ontario premier then outlined all the ways his country can make life more painful for US consumers so long as Trump keeps trying to undermine Canadian sovereignty.

“If it gets really, really bad, I say everything’s on the table,” Ford said. “We need everyone to be on Team Canada and throw everything and the kitchen sink at them, no matter if it’s electricity, if it’s fuel, again, if it’s potash, if it’s uranium. We need to have everything on the table... we can put massive pain on the US. President Trump underestimates us. And that’s the biggest mistake.”



Trump lashed out at both Carney and Ford in a Monday morning Truth Social post.

“The USA will always be far bigger, richer, and stronger than Canada,” Trump wrote. “Without the United States, Canada couldn’t survive—it’s where they get all of their money and, because of their current bad leadership, primarily Governor Carney, and his Flunky, Ford, they will not be allowed to keep taking advantage of the United States—their key to survival.”

Trump EPA Urged to Withdraw Rule to Let Data Centers Obtain Pollution Permits in Secret

“The result will be some of the dirtiest power sources rushed into neighborhoods without giving communities any opportunity to weigh in,” said one critic.


An aerial view of a 33 megawatt data center with closed-loop cooling system on October 20, 2025 in Vernon, California.
(Photo by Mario Tama/Getty Images)

Brad Reed
Aug 25, 2026
COMMON DREAMS

Critics are warning that President Donald Trump’s Environmental Protection Agency is pushing through a rule that would let artificial intelligence data center builders off the hook for making public disclosures ahead of construction.

The rule, which first came to light during an EPA meeting last month, would delegate power to states over public participation in the permitting process for specific sources of air pollution, such as diesel generators that are frequently used by data centers.

According to a July report in Mother Jones, the proposed rule “could have major consequences for how ordinary people are given notice about new or expanded polluting facilities coming into their neighborhoods.”

Late last week, a coalition of more than 200 environmental groups filed objections to the rule change, which they warned would make public notice for certain polluting projects entirely optional, depending on the whims of state and local governments.

Dori Jaffe, managing attorney at Sierra Club, said on Monday that the rule change would “help data center developers evade more health standards and do so secretly.”

“We demand that the EPA rescind this attempt to further cut the public out of decisions made in their own backyards,” said Jaffe. “We deserve to have a say about developments in our community that would impact our air quality and the health of our families.”

Sheena Patel, attorney for the Natural Resources Defense Council, noted that the administration was attempting to limit public input into polluting projects at a time when opposition to AI data center construction has hit a record high among US voters.

If the rule change goes through, Patel added, “the result will be some of the dirtiest power sources rushed into neighborhoods without giving communities any opportunity to weigh in.”

Brandon Jones-Cobb, senior attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity, said it was “beyond cruel” that the EPA seems determined to “silence front-line communities who bear the brunt of unhealthy air” generated by polluting industries.

“The agency has already turned its back on science, cut enforcement against industrial polluters and eliminated life-saving air pollution measures,” said Jones-Cobb. “Now it wants to shut the public out of decisions to build or expand facilities that expose communities to dangerous air pollution, including data centers. This EPA is so out of touch with Americans and only focuses on making polluters happy.”

In an interview with The Guardian published Tuesday, Joe Goffman, former assistant administrator for the EPA’s office of air and radiation, said the rule change would dismantle what he described as an “ironclad promise” made in the 1963 Clean Air Act to give ordinary citizens voices in where, how, and whether potential centers of air pollution are built.

“The administration is basically saying: ‘You all may have thought this was an ironclad promise, but it no longer is,’” Goffman emphasized.


Trump Regulators Issue Key Permit for Proposed $100 Million Underwater Data Center Off Maine Coast

“No one really wants it here,” said one local resident who helped gather signatures in support of blocking the data center.


Skip Johnson and his grandson, Parker Jarrett, fish for mackerel on September 15, 2023 in Eastport, Maine, which is being considered as the site of an underwater data center—alarming locals and the fishing industry.
(Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images)


Julia Conley
Aug 24, 2026
COMMON DREAMS

Residents of Eastport, Maine are set to attend a public hearing Monday evening on two proposed ordinances to halt the construction of large artificial intelligence data centers, with proponents of the proposals hoping the coastal city’s planning board will be able to prevent the build-out of a 27-acre, $100 million facility that a Massachusetts-based developer aims to build underwater—right near Eastport’s working waterfront.

The public hearing is being held days after President Donald Trump’s Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) accepted a preliminary permit for DeepGreen Holdings, LLC, the firm managed by luxury real estate development Louis Wolfson, which aims to build the facility that would be powered by tidal energy.

The 48-month permit does not allow DeepGreen to start construction, but gives approval for engineering and environmental studies needed to secure funding and officially begin the project.

DeepGreen would use ocean water to cool the heat created by the facility’s massive computer servers. The company has also proposed using ocean tides to power turbines that would generate up to 5 megawatts of electricity.

The approval came weeks after FERC asked DeepGreen to amend its application, lowering its energy output from 51 megawatts to 15 megawatts and creating scalable project phases.

The community has mobilized against the proposed data center since DeepGreen applied for the permit in February, with the Eastport City Council voting unanimously earlier this month in support of a 180-day moratorium halting all progress on the center.

The local policymakers said the moratorium would give the city time to consult with the planning board about the two citizen-led initiatives to pass new ordinances—one that would permanently ban data centers in Eastport, which the city’s legal counsel has said could be put to voters with a minor formatting change to the question, and another that would require voter approval for any new industrial or commercial development larger than 10,000 square feet in the ocean or 25,000 square feet on land.

The second ordinance was found by the legal counsel to be “unenforceable and unlawful,” as the town is not permitted to regulate elections via ordinance.

But residents, officials with the Sipayik Passamaquoddy community, and local groups like Eastport Coalition for Healthy Oceans are all pushing to stop DeepGreen and the development it incorporated a month before applying for the permit, DeepGreen Western Passage SPV, or special purpose vehicle.

DeepGreen has also applied for a permit to build an underwater data center in Cook Inlet, Alaska.

Opponents say thermal pollution from the project would be destructive to the habitat of lobsters off the coast of Eastport, which are crucial to the city’s fishing economy and working waterfront. They have also raised concerns that a data center off the coast would harm tourism as well as whales and other marine wildlife.

One local opponent, commercial fisherman and renewable energy developer Nathan Curtis, said DeepGreen carries “unmitigated risks of thermal pollution.”

The proposed data center would “require continuous ocean cooling, converting Western Passage into an unmetered industrial heat sink,” wrote Curtis in a letter to FERC before the commission issued the permit. “Continuous thermal discharge into the water column threatens local water temperatures, localized current dynamics, and critical benthic habitats that support Eastport’s commercial fisheries and working waterfront.”

Wolfson denied that the data center, which was approved for an energy output up to 15 megawatts, would harm the coastal region of Eastport.

“As a property manager and developer who has operated within coastal dynamics for 40 years, I have too much respect for working waterfronts to introduce a project that threatens them,” said Wolfson in a letter to Monitor Local.

But Eastport resident Suellen Hendrix, who was part of a local effort to gather signatures in support for the proposed ordinances, told Maine Public that locals appear unconvinced by any assurances from the data center developer.

“Everyone was behind ‘we don’t want this data center,’” Hendrix told Maine Public. “Nobody was questioning, ‘Well, we need the jobs.’ Nobody was questioning why it should be here because no one really wants it here.”



As Common Dreams reported last week, as the Trump administration and AI executives have aggressively pushed for the expansion of data centers, public support has collapsed, with 75% of respondents to a poll by Embold Research saying they would not support a data center near where they live.

“This has happened nationwide, folks, it’s nothing new,” Dwayne Tomah, a historian with the Sipayik Passamaquoddy community adjacent to Eastport, told a crowd of data center opponents at a recent rally on the town’s waterfront. “We’ve got to resist.”



If Big Tech Needs a New Power Plant, It Should Pay for the Whole Damn Thing

Pennsylvania’s new data-center rules get one principle exactly right: Innovation doesn’t include sending your infrastructure bill to everyone else.



An aerial view of a 33 megawatt data center with a closed-loop cooling system is shown on October 20, 2025 in Vernon, California.
(Photo by Mario Tama/Getty Images)


Joshua W.J. Brown
Aug 25, 2026
Common Dreams

There is a remarkably simple test for whether the AI boom is actually as economically transformative as its boosters say it is: Make the companies building it pay their own damn electricity bill.

Not just the meter at the server warehouse. The whole bill.

If a hyperscale data center requires a new power plant, transmission line, substation, distribution upgrade, water system, or grid-reliability backstop, put that cost on the project that caused it. If the economics still work, excellent. Build it. If they don’t, then the public has just learned something extremely important about the business model.

Pennsylvania moved sharply in that direction on August 18. Gov. Josh Shapiro’s new executive order requires data-center developers seeking state permits to meet Responsible Infrastructure Development standards. Among them: Developers must cover the cost of new generation, transmission, distribution, and related infrastructure needed for their projects without shifting those costs to households and businesses.

If the AI boom is real, it can survive a full-cost test.

The order also requires local approval, ends the use of nondisclosure agreements for data-center projects, demands energy and water reporting, and ties state tax benefits to compliance. Pennsylvania’s special counsel for energy affordability is also supposed to work with utility regulators so data centers, rather than ordinary customers, absorb the cost of reliability measures created by their demand.

This shouldn’t be treated as an anti-AI policy. It’s a pro-accounting policy.

The AI industry has been allowed to narrate electricity as though it were weather: Demand is “surging,” capacity is “tight,” the grid is “strained,” and somehow billions of dollars of wires, turbines, transformers, and land just need to appear around the technology.

But demand isn’t weather. Somebody made a decision.

And there is another reason to force the accounting now: A lot of the supposed demand isn’t load yet. It’s proposals. Pennsylvania says more than 100 data-center projects have approached the state, while the governor says only a handful currently look viable enough to have the necessary permits. Across the country, regulators have worried about speculative projects showing up in multiple interconnection queues and inflating forecasts before anybody has proved the customer, financing, or power plan is real.

That matters because utilities build decades-long assets against forecasts. If a speculative 500-megawatt project gets counted as inevitable, everybody can end up paying for infrastructure long after the spreadsheet that justified it has disappeared.

So add another rule: Prove you’re real before the public builds around you. Put down financial security. Identify the end user. Show the power source. Accept a minimum bill that covers infrastructure reserved for you. And if you walk away, you don’t get to leave a transformer-shaped hole in everybody else’s rates.

The International Energy Agency (IEA) reported in April that electricity consumption by data centers jumped 17% in 2025, while electricity use at AI-focused facilities rose even faster. Its 2026 outlook still sees total data-center consumption roughly doubling by 2030 and AI-focused consumption tripling.

In the United States, data centers accounted for roughly half of total electricity-demand growth in 2025, according to the IEA. The Department of Energy had already estimated that data centers consumed about 4.4% of US electricity in 2023 and could reach 6.7-12% by 2028.

There is nothing inherently illegitimate about using that much power. Aluminum smelters use enormous amounts of electricity. Steel mills use enormous amounts of electricity. Electrifying transportation and heating will use enormous amounts of electricity too. A serious industrial society needs to know how to build power.

The illegitimate part begins when one customer’s expansion becomes everyone else’s compulsory investment.

That risk isn’t theoretical. In Virginia, the world’s largest data-center market, Reuters reported this month that Dominion’s fuel costs have risen nearly 90% in five years as data-center growth leaves the utility more exposed to expensive wholesale electricity. Across PJM, which serves 67 million people, the grid operator is now proposing rules that would put some new data centers first in line for curtailment during shortages unless they bring adequate power with them.

Good.

If an AI company wants the upside of scale, it can own the downside of scale too.

That means at least five things.

Make large-load customers pay for the incremental grid infrastructure they cause. Require financial security so households aren’t stuck with stranded assets if a project disappears. Make large-load forecasts public enough to detect speculative projects being counted multiple times. Give communities access to energy, water, and ownership information before approvals. And establish emergency curtailment rules before the emergency arrives.

This is what mature industrial policy looks like. It doesn’t worship growth, and it doesn’t panic about growth. It prices the actual machine.

The alternative is a familiar political trick: Call the upside private innovation and the downside public infrastructure.

No.

If the AI boom is real, it can survive a full-cost test.

If a company needs a new power plant, let it pay for the whole damn thing.


Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.


Joshua W.J. Brown
Joshua W.J. Brown is a Canadian writer, filmmaker, and systems builder whose work examines infrastructure, AI, political economy, and culture.
Full Bio >