Monday, July 29, 2024

 

Global wildfires pump out four times more CO2 than aviation sector

Global wildfires pump out four times more CO2 than aviation sector



 
Devastation after a wildfire in Slave Lake, Alberta / Mrsramsey
By by Roberta Harrington July 28, 2024

Raging wildfires exacerbated by climate change are pumping out vast quantities of carbon dioxide (CO2). This pollutes the atmosphere, raising temperatures even more and creating a fires-climate feedback loop that will only get worse, say experts. 

In northern latitudes, which are especially prone to this feedback loop, Canada and Russia are this summer suffering devastating and unprecedented wildfires.

Canada, at least, does not account to the UN for the CO2 from wildfires.

In western Canada in late July, as much as 10% of oil production was endangered by 170 wildfires, of which 53 were out of control. For Canada, the 2023/2024 winter season was the warmest on record.

As many as half of the buildings in tourist town of Jasper in Alberta in the Rocky Mountains were incinerated, with some 20,000 tourists and 5,000 residents fleeing the flames.

Queen Elizabeth II holidayed there, and Hollywood’s royalty – such as Marilyn Monroe, Bing Crosby and Joan Fontaine – often frequented too.

Smoke had reached as far as Chicago.

Canada’s 2024 wildfire season – driven by hot and dry weather – may be worse than 2023, when there was billions of dollars of damage and air pollution that darkened the skies as far away as Europe and China. 

According to the respected Washington-based World Resources Institute (WRI) and the University of Maryland, Canada’s 2023 wildfires burned around 7.8mn hectares of forests — more than six times the annual average since 2001.

This amount of tree cover loss produced roughly 3bn tonnes of CO2 – nearly four times the carbon emissions of the entire global aviation sector in 2022, and 25% more than from all tropical primary forest loss combined in 2023.

“Due to Canada’s emissions accounting methods, most of the country’s wildfire-related emissions will not be officially reported in the UN’s global inventory, despite their substantial contribution to climate change,” said WRI.

Not all countries fail to account for wildfire-caused emissions. But Canada does. According to a 2021 report by a special advisor to Nature Canada, excluding wildfire emissions in managed forests in Canada may underestimate the country’s GHG emissions by 80mn tonnes per year (tpy).

The 2023 wildfires in Canada accounted for more than a quarter of all tree cover loss globally that year, said WRI. Québec, Northwest Territories, Alberta and British Columbia all experienced record-high tree cover loss due to fires in 2023, said the research think-tank.

“The planet is burning up and climate change is indeed a significant factor,” Canada’s Minister of Natural Resources, Jonathan Wilkinson, said at a press conference earlier this summer. He said that climatologists are forecasting “an alarming but all too predictable trend. The intensity of wildfires will continue.”

Wildfires are currently blazing out of control in large parts of the western US

Another recent WRI analysis suggests that globally, forest fires are burning nearly twice as much tree cover today as 20 years ago. In northern latitudes, land surface temperatures are warming at rates roughly double the global average, says the think-tank.

Higher temperatures caused by the climate crisis desiccate the landscape and make forests more vulnerable to fire, driving lengthier fire seasons and larger fires.

As larger forested areas burn, more carbon is emitted into the atmosphere, further exacerbating climate change and contributing to even more fires as part of a fires-climate feedback loop, added the WRI.

“With climate change expected to increase annual burned area by 30-50% globally by the end of the century, wildfires will become an increasingly large source of carbon emissions, further exacerbating climate change,” said the think-tank.

Russian fires

In Russia, wildfire destruction is at nearly 5mn hectares of forest so far this summer, says the Aerial Forest Protection Service, quoted by the Moscow Times. The republic of Sakha in the Far East, which encompasses parts of the Arctic, is the worst hit.

The area devastated has increased for three years in a row. In the entire wildfire season in 2023 and 2022, blazes destroyed 4.6mn and 3.5mn hectares respectively, said Kedr Media. 

As of July 22, as many as 126 wildfires were burning in forests in 11 Russian regions of covering ​​428,726 hectares, Kedr Media also reported. Sakha accounted for the most, 64,500 hectares of wildfires in forests, then Irkutsk Oblast (5,092 hectares) and Buryatia (2,404 hectares), said the environmental outlet.

According to space monitoring data as of July 16, the acreage ravaged by ​​all fires – in forests, on steppes and in peat areas – in Russia was more than 8.8mn hectares, said Kedr. 

In 2021, record-breaking fires charred 18mn hectares of forests – let alone steppes and peat – across Russia, says the Moscow Times. The Sakha Republic was especially hard hit.

Peat fires, in drained marches, can burn for months. They can even smoulder underground through the winter, despite snow.

In the devastating wildfire season of 2010 in Russia, the country’s hottest summer in a millennium, the NGO Wetlands International estimated that 80-90% of the smog in Moscow was from nearby peatland fires, not forest fires, reported Reuters.

‘Zombie fires’ can also occur in northern Canada. In April, smouldering fires left by last year’s wildfires were threatening oil and gas wells. As many as 50 zombie fires were still burning beneath the snow near wells, according to government data analysed by Bloomberg.  

Fire emissions

Recently, the European Union's Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service’s (CAMS) global fire assimilation system data showed that the June 2024 monthly total estimated wildfire carbon emissions for the global Arctic were high, at just under 8.2 mega-tonnes of carbon. Most of the activity was in Sakha, in Russia.

With values calculated up to 26 June, estimated wildfire carbon emissions for the Arctic for the month were already the third highest in the service’s data record dating back two decades.

"The Arctic has been warming at a rate well above that of the planet as a whole, said CAMS senior scientist Mark Parrington. “As a result, conditions at high northern latitudes are becoming more conducive to wildfires and a recent study shows that the northeast Arctic region, and boreal and temperate forests, have been experiencing increases in extreme wildfires.

“We witnessed this in 2019, 2020 and 2021, when the eastern Arctic and sub-Arctic regions experienced very high levels of wildfire activity, and again in 2023, especially at high latitudes in Canada," he said.  

The Arctic is ground zero for climate change, says Professor Gail Whiteman from the University of Exeter and founder of Arctic Basecamp, a team of Arctic experts and scientists.

“The increasing Siberian wildfires are a clear warning sign that this essential system is approaching dangerous climate tipping points,” she said. “What happens in the Arctic doesn't stay there – Arctic change amplifies risks globally for all of us. These fires are a warning cry for urgent action," she said.

Paris exhibition celebrates global spread of surrealism

Jennifer Rankin in Brussels
Sun, 28 July 2024 


Max Ernst: The Fireside Angel (The Triumph of Surrealism)
.Photograph: Classicpaintings/Centre Pompidou

One hundred years ago, in a tiny studio flat in a bohemian district of Paris, a former medical student turned writer set out to define surrealism “for once and for all”. In his Manifesto of Surrealism André Breton called for a new kind of art and literature fired by the unconscious, “the dictation of thought free from any control by reason, exempt from aesthetic or moral preoccupation”.

Far from settling surrealism “for once and for all”, the handwritten document was a departure point for a sprawling, subversive movement of bad dreams, haunting landscapes, fantastical alien creatures, unsettling portraits and visual tricks. Now, a century later, a major exhibition at the Pompidou Centre in Paris, opening in September, will celebrate how surrealism spread around the world, far beyond the environs of the French capital.

The Paris exhibition is the second in a sequence of five. The show opened in Brussels and will move on to Madrid, Hamburg and Philadelphia in 2025. Organisers say it is an unprecedented way to organise an exhibition: while some works and themes remain constant in each city, others change and each museum tells its own story.

Perfect, then, for a movement that always aimed to subvert traditional artistic norms.

When the Pompidou Centre last held a major exhibition on surrealism in 2002, it was characterised as an essentially European movement emanating from a group in Paris. Since then, a great deal of research by universities and museums has enlarged that view, said Marie Sarré, the curator of the show at the Pompidou Centre, the organisation that initiated the project. “This exhibition, on the centenary, aims to show surrealism in all its diversity,” she said.

“It is important to remember that surrealism was a movement that spread – and this is exceptional for an avant-garde movement – around the world, in Europe, but also the United States, South America, Asia and the Maghreb.”

What unites all these artists is Breton’s call to live by the imagination, she suggests. “There is this attention to the wondrous in everyday life. [Surrealism] wants to provoke, to shock, [to show] the wonderful aspect of everyday life that comes from consciousness or access to dreams.”

At the heart of the exhibition will be Breton’s first manifesto, with pages of the original manuscript on display, in a loan from the French national library, which acquired the document in 2021 after it was declared a national treasure.

The emblematic names of the surrealist movement will be present, with works by René Magritte and Salvador Dalí. But visitors will find less well-known figures, such as Japanese artist Tatsuo Ikeda, whose art evoked the horrors of war and the toxic consequences of Japan’s postwar reindustrialisation, and Rufino Tamayo, a Mexican painter active in the middle of the 20th century, who is credited with fusing modernism with pre-Columbian motifs in vividly coloured works.

Reflecting a growing tendency, the Pompidou Centre restores to view neglected female artists, who were long reduced to girlfriends and muses with colourful bit parts in the surrealist story, rather than complex creatives in their own right, such as Leonora Carrington, Dorothy Tanning and Dora Maar.

And it will show surrealism’s contemporary resonances, suggests Marré, citing the surrealist preoccupation with the forest as an echo of modern environmentalism. Surrealism’s anticolonial messages also feature – the Paris exhibition includes artists’ tracts against France’s 1954-62 war in Algeria.

In Brussels, the Royal Museum of Fine Arts took the concept of surrealism backwards in time, looking at the links between late 19th-century symbolists and the surrealists, long seen as separate movements.

“There was no real rupture between what happened before and after the first world war,” said Francisca Vandepitte, the curator of the Brussels exhibition, which closed in late July. “Our fundamental approach is trying to show, for the first time, the links,” she said, citing Fernand Khnopff’s austere, somewhat unsettling late 19th-century portrait of his sister as an influence on Magritte’s 1932 work The Unexpected Answer, which shows a person-sized hole in a similarly sterile-looking doorway.

Related: Keeping it surreal: my Dalí-inspired art trip to Catalonia

Many of the works that were on display in Brussels are going to Paris, although the show will continue to evolve as it tours. The Royal Museum of Fine Arts is lending one of the jewels of its collection to Paris: René Magritte’s The Dominion of Light, where a clear blue sky filled with white fluffy clouds frames a row of trees and houses shrouded in nocturnal light. “If only the sun could shine tonight,” went a 1923 Breton poem that Magritte quoted.

But “it is not the classic travelling exhibition”, said Vandepitte. Instead, similar themes will emerge in some, but not of all the museums, themes suggested by Breton’s manifesto: dreams and nightmares, night, forests, the cosmos. “Each partner puts on the exhibition, building on the richness of its own collections and heritage,” she said.

After Paris, the exhibition moves to the Fundacíon Mapfre in Madrid, which will turn the spotlight on surrealists from the Iberian peninsula, such as Dalí and Joan Miró. Then it is on to the Hamburger Kunsthalle, which will explore the heritage of German romanticism, before arriving at the Philadelphia Museum of Art in late 2025 to tell the story of surrealists in the Americas during their second world war exile.

Fleeing the Nazi advance, artists came to the US, Mexico and the Caribbean, where they encountered new influences. In Mexico, for instance, surrealists discovered traditional mythologies about volcanoes, “wonderful fodder for the surrealist mindset”, says Matthew Affron, the curator of the Philadelphia exhibition.

“Someone who sees all five versions [of the exhibition] is going to have a wonderfully varied and broad understanding both of the character of surrealist art, in terms of its themes and styles, [and] its main concerns,” he said.

Perhaps the changing nature of the exhibition is particularly well suited to surrealism in all its strange and transgressive variety. “There is no such thing as surrealist style,” Affron said. “I would say it’s really a philosophy of life, almost, and a mindset. One of the key ideas of surrealism is that we must let the imagination be freed to take us to places that we have not yet been.”

Surrealism is at the Pompidou Centre in Paris from 4 September to 13 January



PHOTO ESSAY
Thousands protest Serbia’s deal with the European Union to excavate lithium


Two woman take a selfie in front of a podium prior to a protest in Sabac, Serbia, Monday, July 29, 2024. Thousands of people rallied in several towns in Serbia to protest a lithium excavation project the Balkan country’s government recently signed with the European Union.
 (AP Photo/Darko Vojinovic)


BY IVANA BZGANOVIC
AP
 July 29, 2024


SABAC, Serbia (AP) — Thousands of people rallied in several towns in Serbia on Monday to protest a lithium excavation project the Balkan country’s government recently signed with the European Union.

The protests were held simultaneously in the western town of Sabac and the central towns of Kraljevo, Arandjelovac, Ljig and Barajevo. They followed similar gatherings in other Serbian towns in recent weeks.

The deal reached earlier this month on “critical raw materials” could reduce Europe’s dependency on China and push Serbia, which has close ties to Russia and China, closer to the EU. German Chancellor Olaf Scholz attended the summit in Belgrade.

The deal, however, has been fiercely criticized by environmentalists and opposition groups in Serbia who argue it would cause irreversible damage to the environment while bringing little benefit to its citizens.

The biggest lithium reserve in Serbia lies in a western valley that is rich in fertile land and water. Multinational Rio Tinto company had started an exploration project in the area several years ago which sparked huge opposition, forcing its suspension.

RELATED STORIES

German leader to visit Serbia seeking lithium for his country's car industry

Germany's chancellor praises lithium deal with Serbia that could reduce Europe's dependency on China

Serbian police ban cultural festival with Kosovo as pressure mounts on liberal voices

Earlier this month, however, Serbia’s constitutional court overturned the government ‘s previous decision to cancel a $2.4 billion mining project launched by the British-Australian mining company in the Jadar valley, paving the way for its revival.

The Serbian government’s decision to cancel the excavation plans came after thousands of protesters in Belgrade and elsewhere in Serbia blocked major roads and bridges in 2021 to oppose Rio Tinto. Those protests were the biggest challenge yet to the increasingly autocratic rule of Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić.

Vucic has said that any excavation would not start before 2028 and that the government would seek firm environmental guarantees before allowing the digging. Some government officials have hinted a referendum on the issue could also be held.

Protesters who gathered on Monday in Serbian towns said they did not trust the government and would not allow the excavations to go ahead.

“They have usurped our rivers, our forests,” said activist Nebojsa Kovandzic from the town of Kraljevo. “Everything they (government) do they do for their own interests and never in the interest of us, citizens.” The crowd in Kraljevo chanted ‘thieves, thieves.’

In Sabac, protesters waved Serbian flags and held a march through the town after the rally.


A man holds an old Yugoslav Communists’ flag during a protest in Sabac, Serbia, Monday, July 29, 2024. Thousands of people rallied in several towns in Serbia to protest a lithium excavation project the Balkan country’s government recently signed with the European Union. 

A man wearing a mask attends a protest in Sabac, Serbia, Monday, July 29, 2024. Thousands of people rallied in several towns in Serbia to protest a lithium excavation project the Balkan country’s government recently signed with the European Union.


A girl reacts during a protest in Sabac, Serbia, Monday, July 29, 2024. Thousands of people rallied in several towns in Serbia to protest a lithium excavation project the Balkan country’s government recently signed with the European Union.


A woman demonstrates during a protest in Sabac, Serbia, Monday, July 29, 2024. Thousands of people rallied in several towns in Serbia to protest a lithium excavation project the Balkan country’s government recently signed with the European Union.


A man wearing a traditional Serbian hat with Palestinian flag and badge reads: “We don’t give Jadar (area with lithium)!” attends a protest in Sabac, Serbia, Monday, July 29, 2024. Thousands of people rallied in several towns in Serbia to protest a lithium excavation project the Balkan country’s government recently signed with the European Union. 

A woman with drawn four Cyrillic letters for “S” on the Serbian cross, meaning: ''Only Unity Saves the Serb’’ demonstrates during a protest in Sabac, Serbia, Monday, July 29, 2024. Thousands of people rallied in several towns in Serbia to protest a lithium excavation project the Balkan country’s government recently signed with the European Union. 

A boy waves a Serbian flag during a protest in Sabac, Serbia, Monday, July 29, 2024. Thousands of people rallied in several towns in Serbia to protest a lithium excavation project the Balkan country’s government recently signed with the European Union. 


A boy waves a Serbian flag during a protest in Sabac, Serbia, Monday, July 29, 2024. Thousands of people rallied in several towns in Serbia to protest a lithium excavation project the Balkan country’s government recently signed with the European Union. 

(AP Photo/Darko Vojinovic)

Union for Maryland Apple workers reaches first labor deal

By Ehren Wynder


Employees at Apple's Towson, Md., store reached a labor agreement before other high-profile unionization efforts, such as Starbucks and Amazon. File Photo by Brian Kersey/UPI | License Photo

July 27 (UPI) -- The union representing workers at Apple's Towson, Md., store said it reached the first labor deal with the tech giant.

The tentative labor agreement Friday, which is the first of its kind for any U.S. Apple workers, was touted as a "historic" milestone by the union.
Advertisement

The 85 retail employees represented by the International Association of Machinists union are set to vote on whether to ratify the agreement in August.

The Machinists union said the contract includes pay increases averaging 10% over the three-year term of the contract, an increase in starting pay for some job positions, scheduling protections for part- and full-time workers and a disciplinary process with "protections and accountability."

Employees also would be able to maintain their current benefits and have the option to bargain over future additions.

"By reaching a tentative agreement with Apple, we are giving our members a voice in their futures and a strong first step toward further gains," the union said a statement, adding it now plans to win the right to represent retail workers at other stores.

Workers at the Towson Apple store have been seeking to win their first contract since they voted in June 2022 to join the Machinists union. This past May, they voted to authorize a strike without providing a deadline after they accused the company of stalling negotiations.

Despite voting to unionize long before the Towson Apple workers, notable unionization efforts at Starbucks and Amazon have not yet produced labor agreements for their workers.

Apple's store in Oklahoma City is the only other one where workers have voted to unionize. Those workers, represented by the Communications Workers of America, also have not yet gotten a labor deal.

Apple owns and operates some 270 retail stores in the United States.
UK
Labour must speed up wind power expansion or miss targets, says renewables industry

Jillian Ambrose Energy correspondent
THE GUAARDIAN
Sun, 28 July 2024 

RWE's Gwynt y Mor, eight miles off Liverpool Bay, off the coast of north Wales. Labour has been told it must increase the scale and funding of offshore wind auctions.Photograph: Ben Birchall/PA


Labour’s clean energy targets may already be in jeopardy just weeks after the party came to power with the promise to quadruple Britain’s offshore wind power, according to senior industry executives.

The offshore wind industry has said there will not be enough time to develop the projects needed to create a net zero electricity system by the end of the decade unless ministers increase the ambition and funding of the government’s upcoming “make or break” subsidy auctions.

A delay to Labour’s planned renewable energy rollout – which calls for a doubling of onshore wind, tripling of solar power and quadrupling of offshore wind capacity – would also risk derailing Britain’s legally binding climate ambition to be net zero overall by 2050.


“It’s crunch time,” said Damien Zachlod, managing director of the UK arm of the German energy company EnBW. “How close we get to the government’s 2030 offshore wind target depends on whatever happens in the next 18 to 24 months.”

The government may have already missed its chance to meet its 2030 target, according to Zachlod, because “the fastest that you could develop an offshore windfarm is seven years” and “more often than not it takes 10 to 12 years”.

Senior wind power executives fear the industry may fall further behind the 2030 target because the government’s summer auction for offshore wind subsidy contracts, which are paid through home energy bills, is only large enough for a fraction of the developers eager to build windfarms off the UK coast to secure a deal.

They have called on Ed Miliband, the energy secretary, to almost double the budget for the £800m auction so that more projects can secure a contract and accelerate the industry’s progress towards the 2030 target.

The intervention comes after one of the UK’s leading energy analysis providers warned that a “step-change” in government policy was required to bring forward £48bn in private spending to close the renewable investment gap needed to meet its 2030 targets.

The government set out plans last week for GB Energy, its state-owned power company, to partner with the king’s property management firm, the crown estate, to accelerate the development of enough offshore wind to power 20m homes. This is expected to benefit projects that begin generating electricity in the 2030s but do little to meet the near-term target.

Keith Anderson, the chief executive of Scottish Power, one of Britain’s biggest renewable energy investors, said that even if the government allows more developers to compete in the auction this summer there will “still be developers lining up to compete for contracts in the auction in one year’s time”.

This is partly because the previous Conservative government failed to award a single offshore wind contract in last year’s auction by setting the price too low, in what critics have called the biggest clean energy policy failure in almost a decade.

Anderson added that there was a “very low risk” of the new government saddling households with higher energy bills by encouraging more projects to be built because the cost of offshore wind is below forecasts for future energy market prices.

“There is a big opportunity here to invest in the future of the UK’s clean growth, and a lot of projects which are ready to take that up. Now is the time for the government to go faster,” Anderson said.

Nathan Bennett, the head of communications at RenewableUK, said more than 10GW-worth of new offshore wind was eligible for bids in this summer’s auction, but the current funding available would only be enough for half this capacity.

He said the green energy trade body was urging ministers to raise the budget to allow for more winning bids to “make up lost ground” from last year’s auction and create the substantial pipeline of projects needed to accelerate supply chain investment and growth in the UK.

RenewableUK is understood to have called on ministers to nearly double the £800m funding pot for offshore wind to £1.5bn in the upcoming auction. The government has also set aside £105m for a separate auction for floating windfarms, which should it raise to £464m, according to the trade group.

“We need to make the UK the most attractive business environment to secure the maximum amount of private investment in clean energy in the face of intense international competition,” Bennett said.

A government spokesperson said Miliband was “carefully considering” whether to increase the budget for the summer auction and would “confirm his decision soon”.

 Sustainable development must work or world faces ‘massive tragedy’, expert says

Protected Gabon forest (Emily Beament/PA)

By Emily Beament, PA Environment Correspondent



A failure to deliver sustainable development that conserves nature and helps people will be a “massive human tragedy”, a former African environment minister has warned.

Professor Lee White was minister of forests, oceans, environment and climate change in Gabon under president Ali Bongo Ondimba before a coup in the central African country in August 2023, overseeing its policies on sustainable forestry.

Under the former government, policies were put in place to deliver sustainable forestry, switch from an extractive forest economy to one that kept more money in the country, and to try and secure carbon credits which would see other countries pay to keep Gabon’s forests intact for climate and nature.

Gabon’s forests are part of the highly-threatened Congo basin rainforest, and the country is home to a wealth of biodiversity including western lowland gorillas, forest elephants and chimpanzees.

Prof White warned the loss of the region’s forests would put a huge amount of carbon emissions into the atmosphere, hit water supplies to the Nile and Egypt’s agriculture, and accelerate desertification in the Sahel.

If we can't make it work, climate change will accelerate, biodiversity loss will accelerate

Lee White

This would create hundreds of millions of climate refugees and destabilise the entire African continent, he said.

Pause
Unmute

“The impacts of climate change in the medium term on peace and security, the stability and therefore the economic impacts and the social impacts are potentially, just absolutely catastrophic.”

And Prof White warns that conservation with the kind of sustainable development Gabon has tried to create has to work, or there will be catastrophic impacts of climate change around the world.

“If we can’t make it work, climate change will accelerate, biodiversity loss will accelerate, and we’re going to have to put the planet on life support in 10, 20, 30 years,” he warned.

He pointed to the devastating hurricanes already seen this year, and the threat to water supplies to billions of people in Asia from the melting of the Himalayan glaciers.

“We have to change, we can’t not change, and therefore carbon credits for rainforests, and biodiversity credits and sustainable development just has to work,” he said.

Forests in Gabon are sustainably managed (Emily Beament/PA)

Prof White, from Manchester, was speaking as Sky Documentaries releases an “enviro-thriller”, detailing his life, the fight against corruption and illegal logging cartels and the efforts to secure support for protecting Gabon’s forests at UN climate negotiations.

Gabon claimed to have achieved near-zero rates of deforestation through rules limiting logging in forestry concessions, with the forests monitored by satellites and drones to prevent illegal logging.

And the export of unprocessed logs was banned more than a decade ago, with efforts to encourage international companies to invest in processing factories in Gabon, to ensure more the value of the timber and associated jobs are kept in the country.

The idea is to sustain the forest, while shifting Gabon from an extractive economy – where the value of its products end up in other countries where processing takes place – to one where the forests benefit local people.

The country also developed carbon credits under a UN scheme for its forests, but efforts to sell them have been derailed by the coup and saw Prof White arrested and accused of stealing money from the credits scheme before being allowed to leave Gabon.

The former environment minister said it was still early days for the new regime but so far it looked as though the country is maintaining existing policies, and sustainable forestry was contributing more and more to the Gabonese economy so “there’s a good chance that the model is working and will stick”.

– Gabon: Earth’s Last Chance is available to watch on streaming service NOW.

Assassination: “for the good of Rome”

"The question with Trump is, Would his death have made any difference to the misery and suffering in the world? "

byDylan Neri
29-07-2024 10:29
in Opinion, Politics


Photo by Zwiebackesser/Shutterstock.com


The euphemistic word ‘assassination’ might have something to do with the ironic regret felt among many (even if it isn’t widely admitted in the mainstream) that, in a nation where statistically everyone owns a gun, the one who eventually stepped up to do the job managed to miss the target. No points for near-misses here; only the bullseye will do. The word suggests something clinical, bloodless, without suffering. Routine; all in a day’s work. Imagine the headline: ‘Two children assassinated’. Crikey. Must have been some bad kids. But murder them? Different story. Though even murder has an air of formality about it. As if the crime is the work of some schemer, to be solved only by a Holmes or a Columbo. Then there’s always ‘kill’. A reliable Germanic root. Kill. Almost forces the meaning into you as you read it. (There’s something about four-letter, one-syllable English words of the form consonant-vowel-double consonant that has that wonderful effect.) To be sure, the almost-assassin was, in every account, killed.
Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar

That is, there are connotations to the type of death, or near death, one can experience. And in the case of the former president of the USA it is at least logical to assume some element of the political was involved; that this attempted execution, or termination, or cessation of life, was indeed an assassination. (But maybe he just didn’t like the guy; maybe he was a neo-Hinckley.) In the realm of politics and propaganda, death becomes a subject in itself. Brutus did not assassinate Caesar, but rather “as he was ambitious, I slew him”, implying an element of the sacrificial, the scapegoat, a submission, or resignation, to a higher purpose. In this case “for the good of Rome”, for the survival of democracy. They were “sacrificers, not butchers”. The result was that the tyrant didn’t merely die but rather “suffered death”, as if it were a natural cause. While Marc Antony, the master of political propaganda, saw those daggers as the daggers of “butchers”, of “villains, murderers” and “traitors”.
Taking a “bullet for democracy”?

In much the same way, it was universally reported that democracy itself survived an assassination attempt. Donald Trump declared that he had taken “a bullet for democracy”, while it was almost impossible to avoid seeing the image of him standing before an American flag with his clenched fist raised in defiance, a symbol of the protest synonymous with social justice fighters of the 20th century (who were, you might note, largely anti-democratic). This is the age of the image, after all; any doubt about the connection between democracy and the political system, here represented by Trump, has only been reinforced, either forcefully or subliminally.
Is assassination ever justifiable?

Every sane and reasonable commentator has pointed out that murder is wrong. That it is never the way to go about things. It is one of the most memorable ‘thou shalt nots’ in the Bible, after all the neurotic preamble about other gods. As Andrew Marr writes in the New Statesman, “assassination as an idea is inhumane; as a political strategy is a dead end; as a tactic is worse than futile.” (The tautology here confirming the lazy use of assassination as a synonym for murder.) But just as the Bible then goes on to offer a mandate for genocide in the name of the Lord, it is always possible to justify murder in some hypothetical context, provided the cause is just and the reasoning sound. It is a moral question. Everyone has asked, “Would you kill X if you could?” Marr offers the example of Hitler and notes that, as in other historical cases of assassination, it would only have led to another figure taking his place. But given what we know now, the question is at least debatable, if meaningless. The point is, if you knew that murder, assassination, whatever, would lead to less misery and suffering, then it would be more than morally justifiable to act.

Thus the justification for official murder is given by those who control the sources of information. When the US vapourised South Vietnam, for example, it did so because it knew that it was saving the Vietnamese (and the wider region) from the greater evil of communism. Or when US-supplied weapons are used by Israeli forces to destroy Palestinians, it is only in retaliation against immoral acts by religious fanatics, in the morally righteous cause of self-defence. You can think of your own examples. Marr offers Saddam Hussein, asking whether it would have been moral to assassinate him rather than launch a war: “the obvious answer may be yes”. Here we see how intellectuals can internalise the moral actions of the state (as if states themselves were moral agents) while also arguing that, when it’s a state or organisation we disagree with, it becomes morally debatable. Marr does not for example ask whether it would have been acceptable to assassinate Saddam Hussein while the US and UK and other Western allies supported him in his genocide of the Kurdish minority in Iraq. “Assassination is never the answer to political pain” – unless we are the assassins, he might have added, then it is possibe.
Attempted assassination of Trump

The question with Trump then is, Would his death have made any difference to the misery and suffering in the world? In the neoliberal age, in which politics (particularly in the US and the UK) serve the interests of corporations, especially the financial sector, at the expense of worker rights and the wellbeing of the poor – what’s euphemistically called a “friendly business environment” – the differences between leaders becomes almost negligible for anyone in need of political action. For corporations and shareholders the difference between a Democrat 28% and a Trump 15% rate of corporate income tax is perhaps significant; but the misery and suffering element is lacking. While state-sponsored terror – whether in Indochina, Latin America or the Middle East – and the cross-party focus on the neoliberal economic model, which has led to enormous levels of income inequality since 1980, are guaranteed whether or not the leader is blue or red, Obama or Bush. And while there might be an argument that Trump’s climate change denial is an existential threat to our species, it is almost certain that another Republican with an emphasis on individual (ie corporate) liberty will continue to downplay the impact of man-made emissions for the greater good of deregulation and lower taxes.

The point is that individuals and personal whims doubtless make a difference, but speculations about such things are baseless and hold little interest. To understand and change the world, it is important to pay attention to what is really happening, not what might happen. It was first and last a question of morality: murder is wrong, unless it could be justified. This says nothing about the state of democracy, but to suggest it does is to miss the point entirely and sweep away the crucial question along with the bogus ones. As Marr writes, “…economically secure, well-educated, well-defended societies provide little space for populists, never mind tyrants… we must always look for political answers”. Perhaps ask how the people of Vietnam, Nicaragua, Palestine, view the democratically elected US presidents. The word tyrant might come up. He also notes that America is a democracy and that its victims of assassination were not tyrants but “chosen leaders”. His examples of Lincoln (elected when over half the population couldn’t vote) and Kennedy (who escalated the war in Vietnam from aggression to outright attack) suggest otherwise; while his other example, Martin Luther King, was not elected at all.

What this does is lump all political action that is outside the accepted channels, whether it is an assassination attempt or a popular grassroots movement, into the group marked ‘populist’. By extension, any political opinion that is not within the narrow spectrum of accepted discourse is censured. Democracy is a word that must be defined in advance and is constantly redefined to suit the needs of the user. To the modern western intellectual this means anything resembling the current system, in which the electorate freely votes to transfer its wealth to the top 0.1%, and to surrender its hard-won rights and privileges to multinational corporations. It is a world where politics is ‘done’ by one group of people on behalf of others; in which political action must never be in the hands of the majority, and change can only come from above. The attempted murder of Trump has only entrenched this position, only solidified the solidarity among what Marr unironically calls the “trade union of the political top dogs”. So, it isn’t so much that Trump took a bullet for democracy, but rather it seems that democracy took a bullet for Donald Trump and the establishment.