Wednesday, July 31, 2024

LABOR DAY 2024 – Massive Actions for Worker Livelihoods



 
 July 26, 2024
\FacebookTwitter

Image by Jon Tyson.

Labor Day in Reality for September 2, 2024 is a huge, ignored asset, except by the commercial interests offering “sales.” A neglected Labor Day symbolizes the decline of labor unions and the absence of vigorous leadership generating higher levels of energy for Labor supremacy over Capital. Up to now, many labor leaders have had little focused interest in making Labor Day a grand national media day, from appearances on the Sunday news talk shows to producing thousands of events around the country that nourish labor solidarity, regardless of political labels.

Corporatist predations and exploitations make all workers, regardless of their political leanings, bleed the same color. Vibrant Labor Day events would be grounded not in nostalgia or self-anthems, but in the vital need to overcome worsening structural injustices at all levels of the workplace.

Overdue worker necessities include a living wage, affordable universal health care, child tax credits, the Western European safety nets of paid childcare, paid family leave and maternal care. Crackdowns on corporate crimes, fraud and abuse, and ending autocratic workplaces under fine print concessionary contracts which turn workers into modern-day serfs are also needed.

The Trumpsters want to TAKE AWAY many existing worker rights and limit the ability of unions to gain power. The AFL-CIO has highlighted several anti-worker policies of the Project 2025 Agenda developed by the Trumpsters. It includes:

* Banning unions for public service workers;

* Firing civil service workers and replacing them with Trump anti-union loyalists;

* Letting bosses eliminate unions mid-contract;

* Letting companies stop paying overtime and allowing states to opt out of federal overtime and minimum wage laws; and

* Eliminating child labor protections.

(See: AFL-CIO Highlights the Anti-Worker Foundation of Trump’s Second-Term Agenda, for more details.)

Communities can organize events on reversing corporate-managed trade agreements. Depending on the location, special events can be tailored, especially in swing states, to give workers a platform to talk about the outsourcing of jobs to low-wage repressive countries and other attacks on labor. Assemblies, rallies, voter registration drives, marches, demonstrations and even agenda-driven parades – a lost tradition in most regions – could build support for a pro-worker agenda. Organizing these events could either induce or demand commitments by invited candidates for office in November. No diverting candidate handshakes, fake smiles and sweet talk on this no-nonsense day.

Firm commitments, wrapped in a “WORKER COMPACT” for America, in the weeks after Labor Day, can be tied to enabling legislation, copies of which can be distributed at the events. Challenging anti-labor laws like Taft-Hartley and weaknesses in NLRB procedures, weak corporate sanctions, coming out for card checks, etc., should be a part of the “WORKER COMPACT.” In truth, Labor Day could also be an occasion for formally summoning Senators and Representatives and state lawmakers to worker-organized and conducted Town Meetings. (See: Sending Citizens Summons to Members of Congress at nader.org or my book “Breaking Through Power: It’s Easier Than We Think” for boilerplate formal summons language.)

The publicized focus on concrete improvements in livelihoods and shifts of power advancing the lives of workers where they work and raise their families will excite voters and motivate them to raise their own sense of significance and encourage them to participate in Labor Day actions with fellow workers. The momentum can be carried forward to election day showing the stark contrasts between the pro-worker and anti-worker candidates and political parties.

Labor Day is the opening bell for the final stretch drive before election day. (See my August 17, 2022 column: To Democrats: Make Labor Day A Workers’ Action Day).

In a winner-take-all Electoral College system, a 10% turnout from eligible non-voters and turning out more occasional voters will answer, with jackhammer determination, the age-old voter question of “Which Side Are You On?” Politicians and political party officials who don’t show up due to their indentured corporatism will be exposed in the raw by name. The Labor movement arouses and achieves dominance as stronger and more resolute, sweeping aside the “divide and conquer” manipulations that dominate reporting in the rancid social and mainstream media.

Purposeful Labor Day events will also bring forth support and participation by civic organizations. Nationwide, they have millions of members.

There are six weeks or so to Labor Day. Too much of the AFL-CIO sat out the last election (2022) leaving it up to “the more credible locals” according to Damon Silver. An aroused AFL-CIO can provide the galvanizing strategy and resources to use Labor Day as it should be used, and then some, to build a decisive momentum for November and beyond. Used to defeatism, accustomed to tying themselves unconditionally to the corporate Democratic Party – itself suffering from this trait – this reversal would shock the media and the young generation into attentiveness.

There are many Labor Leaders who would spearhead a massive Labor Day event including Sara Nelson of the Association of Flight Attendants-CWA, Mark Dimondstein of the American Postal Workers Union, and other long-time labor union leaders and activists such as  Baldemar Velasquez (Farm Labor Organizing Committee)), John Samuelsen (Transport Workers Union), Carl Rosen (UE General President), Gene Bruskin (National Labor Network for a Ceasefire) and RoseAnn DeMoro (retired executive director of National Nurses United), Larry Cohen (CWA former president) and many others. And the pulsating Culinary Union in Nevada and the UAW have shown some of labor’s true potential to galvanize support for a “WORKERS COMPACT.”

Some elected candidates can bear down publicizing this venture, as well as some suggested sparkplugs such as the great author/speaker Jim Hightower. What is needed, for starters, is a major national call for action and then moving intoperson-to-person outreach. Adequate funding is essential and grassroots outreach will be much more effective than millions of dollars spent on corporate conflicted media consultants craving their 15% commissions from forgettable Democratic Party TV ads.

Imagine a huge rally next to the New York Stock Exchange to demand a stock, bond, derivatives tiny progressive sales tax that can raise over $300 to $500 billion a year. New York State has collected and rebated this tax since 1981 — about $40 million a day to the brokers. Hundreds of billions of foregone dollars could have been devoted to specific necessities of New Yorkers. See the ongoing corporate campaign website: https://www.corporatecampaign.org/

Time is of the essence, but there is still time to make Labor Day a lasting Workers Action Event. A new tradition, if you will.

Ralph Nader is a consumer advocate, lawyer and author of Only the Super-Rich Can Save Us! 


Down and Out in San Francisco


 
 July 26, 2024
Facebook



Image by Joshua Earle.

For many residents of the United States, especially those in its cities and larger suburbs, the fact of homelessness is quite well established. Camps made up of lean-tos, tents, small fire pits and people exist in parks, woods, along city streets and under freeway bridges around the nation. The reaction to these settlements by residents with houses and local authorities ranges from acceptance and providing services to the unhoused to vigilante and police attacks on the encampments. Despite the differences in these responses, both represent an acceptance of an essential fact: most people living outside because they can’t afford to live inside do so because of the capitalist economy.

Those who support the vigilantes and the police attacks on the unhoused are, in essence, rejecting the humanity of those being attacked and “swept” up (to use a popular euphemism). Whether they acknowledge this truth or not, their actions reveal an understanding that only people with houses matter when all is said and done. Meanwhile, those who work through churches, social services and other organizations that assist the unhoused prove a certain belief that modern capitalism is irredeemable.

J. Malcolm Garcia worked in an organization helping the unhoused during the 1990s. The agency was in San Francisco. I lived in the San Francisco Bay Area from the late 1970s until the mid-1980s. Of the seven or eight years I lived there, I spent a few of them on the streets. Even then, there were several hundred, if not thousands, of unhoused folks making do, keeping away from the cops, hitting the free meals and sleeping where they could. By 1984—after almost four years of neoliberal Reaganomics—those numbers had increased dramatically. So had a certain sense of desperation as funding was taken away from government agencies and non-profits that served the poor—housed and unhoused. I was lucky. I got out. Some of my friends did not.

Since his work in the social services world of San Francisco, Mr. Garcia has gone on to become one of the world’s most unique and honest journalists. His articles focus on those whose lives have been disrupted, even overturned, by US capitalism and its wars. Several collections of his work have been published and received plaudits and awards. This summer, Seven Stories published his first novel, titled Out of the Rain.

Like his journalism, this novel is about people. Based on his experiences as a social worker in an agency that worked with those without houses, Garcia tells his story with a collection of profiles. From the chronic and amiable alcoholic Walter to the tragic life of a crack addict named Varneeta, the author weaves a profound tale of humanity. Lives that most of his readers can only imagine, if even that, are chronicled in bits and pieces. People in recovery struggling with the urge to go to the liquor store instead of work; men fighting off urges to take advantage of vulnerable women they interact with at the shelter and men that give in to those urges; recovering alcoholics and drug users living lives of loneliness because their previous friends are still using and are nothing but a temptation. Informing it all is the primary protagonist Tom who directs the shelter and center that serves as the focal point for the novel’s characters. His job is one that requires compassion, but demands a certain ruthlessness. That ruthlessness is most often related to the other primary informant of the tale: a national and local economy that cuts funding for services to the poor in favor of profits for the rich. For anyone who has been to San Francisco since Reagan took over the country they must certainly agree that it is the rich who matter the most there.

This is a very human story. It is also very honest. Despite the occasionally unbearable misfortunes that happen to different characters at points in the narrative, a certain hopeful spirit remains the novel’s essence. At the novel’s end, Tom has moved on from his role at the shelter and center to a new job helping refugees. His burnout from caring too much while wrestling with politicians and funders who don’t really like the grimness and squalor of lives lived in the street has won out. This novel is his reminder to the reader as to why we need to care.

Ron Jacobs is the author of Daydream Sunset: Sixties Counterculture in the Seventies published by CounterPunch Books. He has a new book, titled Nowhere Land: Journeys Through a Broken Nation coming out in Spring 2024.   He lives in Vermont. He can be reached at: ronj1955@gmail.com


China’s Lightning-Fast Renewable Triumphs



 
 July 26, 2024
Facebook

Image by Planet Volumes.

A few years ago, China’s climate envoy Xie Zhenhua and U.S. climate envoy John Kerry shook hands on a pledge to triple renewable energy by 2030. China took the challenge seriously, very seriously, it will meet its end-of-2030 emissions target this year (2014), six years early.

In the blink of an eye, China is constructing wind and solar farms that are equivalent to building five large nuclear power stations per week! Yes, per week. They understand the multitude of risks of climate change, especially since it is happening in real time right in everybody’s face, and they’re doing something about it faster than the rest of the world combined.

In 2023, China installed 293 gigawatts of wind and solar, taking capacity up to 1,050 gigawatts, which is more than double its capacity in 2020. For comparisons purposes, a typical nuclear power plant produces one (1) gigawatt of electricity. Already 51% of China’s electricity generation comes from non-fossil fuel sources.

China is sending signals to the rest of the world, just do it!

When President Biden committed $1 trillion to clean energy, China’s response was to double down and go twice as fast. Effectively, Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act (“IRA”) inspired China to get off its butt and go all-in. This is direct evidence that America’s energy policies are infectious and impact major nations of the world.

It should be noted that Trump has publicly stated his intention to destroy Biden’s IRA renewable energy policies, tossing them out in favor of proposals similar to his Faustian bargain with oil and gas chieftains, if they cough-up $1 billion for his campaign, Trump cuts taxes and removes regulations to drill baby drill. That’ll make America great again, umm, change that to “make America hotter than ever!”

China is also deemphasizing nuclear as a solution to global warming by scaling back once-ambitious plans in favor of more wind and solar. According to Climate Energy Finance (Aust.), China is installing 10 gigawatts of wind and solar generation capacity every two weeks. It takes 10 years to build the same nuclear generating capacity. Nuclear versus renewables – no contest, renewables win hands down! (Source: China is Installing the Wind and Solar Equivalent of Five Large Nuclear Power Stations Per Week, ABC Science, July 15, 2024)

The Chinese Communist Party has teed up every department of government for renewables. This massive transition is taking place in remote regions like the Gobi Desert. On the western edge of the country, the world’s largest solar and wind farms are under construction. These massive power farms are connected to major cities via the world’s longest high-voltage transmission lines.

Since the start of the 21st Century, every Five-Year Plan has called for strategic investments in all aspects of renewable technologies. Most China watchers claim that Xi Jinping’s surprising announcement at the 2020 UN General Assembly promising that China would achieve peak emissions by 2030 lit the fire for even more rapid growth of renewable installations.

To stabilize supply of power, China is using a mix of pumped hydro and battery storage to supplement intermittent power. And alongside renewables, China is still building dozens of coal-fired plants to meet demands for electricity as heavy energy users, like electrified transport, place demands on the system beyond the current capacity of renewable installations, as well as providing stable power to balance intermittent solar and wind. Eventually, their goal is for renewables to overtake coal.

According to Climate Energy Finance’s Xuyang Dong, despite China’s reliance on coal, “having China go green at this speed and scale provides the world with a textbook to do the same” Energy experts claim China is upstaging the United States by taking the pole position on an issue that the world is just starting to experience in real time, i.e., the ravages of global warming.

Indeed, China’s proactive leadership role, by setting an example for how it’s done, gains worldwide respect and alliances. In that regard, the world spends $7 trillion a year on coal, gas, and oil, which could be used for renewables.

What of America?

When it comes to green policies and associated ethical standards, as well as fitness to handle the big job, America’s top presidential candidates are best described, in no particular order of relevance: (1) lackluster orange vs. radiant green (2) incoherent geriatric vs. scintillating maturity (3) convicted felon vs. experienced prosecutor. Nowadays, the chant “Lock him up” echoes at Democratic campaign rallies. Is this hitting below the belt? YES!

Robert Hunziker lives in Los Angeles and can be reached at rlhunziker@gmail.com.