Thursday, September 12, 2024

 

Antarctica’s receding sea ice could impact seabirds’ food supply



Durham University
Southern giant petrel (2).jpg 

image: 

Close-up of a southern giant petrel.

view more 

Credit: Professor Richard Phillips




Antarctica’s rapidly receding sea ice could have a negative impact on the food supply of seabirds that breed hundreds of miles away from the continent.

Most of the world's albatrosses, and their close relatives, petrels, breed on islands in the Southern Ocean, which surrounds Antarctica.

Now new research led by Durham University, UK, and the British Antarctic Survey (BAS) has used satellite technology to track the movement of these seabirds.

They found that the birds fly huge distances to parts of the ocean affected by sea ice – called the Antarctic seasonal sea ice zone.

It is thought they travel to either feed in the nutrient enriched waters left behind when Antarctica’s sea ice melts each summer or, in the case of southern giant petrels, to scavenge on seals found on the ice itself.

Until recently, Antarctica had not suffered the big losses in sea ice seen in the Arctic, but over the past five years Antarctic sea ice has begun to recede at a quicker rate.

The findings suggest that Antarctica’s shrinking sea ice could force seabirds to travel further from their breeding grounds to find food or it could alter the patterns of where that food can be found. In turn, this could affect the ecosystems these birds are a part of.

The study is published in the journal Progress in Oceanography.

Lead author Dr Ewan Wakefield, in the Department of Geography, Durham University, said: “Every winter the sea freezes around Antarctica, with sea ice covering tens of millions of square miles.

“We found that albatrosses and large petrels travel hundreds of miles, some far into the area covered by this sea ice and we think that they do this to feed.

“In that case, Antarctica’s receding sea ice, driven by climate change, could affect not just the penguins, familiar to many people, that breed on the continent, but also huge numbers of seabirds breeding hundreds or thousands of miles away.”

The researchers analysed data showing the movements of seven species of albatross and large petrel from the sub-Antarctic island of South Georgia, which is about 1,000 miles from Antarctica.

These species were the northern giant petrel, southern giant petrel, white-chinned petrel, light-mantled albatross, black-browed albatross, grey-headed albatross and the wandering albatross.

In total they looked at 2,497 foraging trips made by 1,289 of the seabirds from satellite data collected between 1992 and 2023.

They found that all seven species used sea ice-affected parts of the ocean, but in different ways.

For example, albatrosses largely avoided ice-covered areas, probably because they find it difficult to fly or land there. However, in late summer and autumn, albatrosses fed in areas where the ice had melted weeks or months earlier and released concentrated nutrients into the sea.

In contrast, during the spring, southern giant petrels flew hundreds of miles into the pack ice, which researchers think they do to scavenge on the seals that breed on the ice.

On a bigger scale, researchers also found a remarkable pattern of birds moving north and south with the seasons, which they think is caused by birds following plankton blooms in the oceans – known as green wave surfing.

Antarctic sea ice was relatively stable during the period when the satellite data was recorded, but in recent summers seasonal sea ice has retreated earlier and reached record lows.

Study co-author Professor Richard Phillips, leader of the Higher Predators and Conservation Group at the British Antarctic Survey, said: “Given that all seven species of albatross and petrel we looked at travelled to the Antarctic seasonal sea ice zone, it is likely that they, and many other sub-Antarctic breeding seabirds, are linked to sea ice dynamics.

“Declines in Antarctic sea ice predicted under climate change could exacerbate the already unsustainable human impacts being experienced by these populations.”

The researchers said there were some limitations to their study.

While their analysis showed that the birds used sea ice affected habitats, they do not exactly know what the birds are eating. They hope this will be shown by follow-up tracking and dietary studies to give a better idea of how changing sea ice might affect different species.

The resolution of the sea ice and tracking data was not sufficient to tell how birds interacted with sea ice at fine scale and the researchers hope fine scale tracking could resolve this.

For several of the species, the beginning and end of the breeding period was not covered by tracking, so the researchers do not know how they might use sea ice habitats during that time.

The research also included BirdLife International, the University of Barcelona, the University of Helsinki, Stony Brook University and the University of Coimbra. 

It was funded by the Leverhulme Trust, the European Research Council H2020, the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC), Darwin Plus, the National Science Foundation and the GSGSSI.

The study also benefited from the strategic programme of the Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre (MARE), financed by the Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) and represents a contribution to the Ecosystems component of the BAS Polar Science for Planet Earth Programme, funded by NERC.

ENDS

 

Rapid loss of Antarctic ice after 2100 likely under current emissions



Dartmouth-led study compiles 16 models for refined projection of ice loss up to 2300



Dartmouth College





A Dartmouth-led study by more than 50 climate scientists worldwide provides the first clear projection of how carbon emissions may drive the loss of Antarctica's ice sheet over the next 300 years.

The future of Antarctica's glaciers after 2100 becomes uncertain when looking at existing ice-sheet models individually, the researchers report in the journal Earth's Future. They combined data from 16 ice-sheet models and found that, collectively, the projections agree that ice loss from Antarctica will increase, but gradually, through the 21st century, even under current carbon emissions.

But that consistency falls off a cliff after 2100, the researchers found. The models predict that under current emissions, ice in most of Antarctica's western basins begins to retreat rapidly. By 2200, the melting glaciers could increase global sea levels by as much as 5.5 feet. Some of the team's numerical experiments projected a near-total collapse of the Antarctic ice sheet by 2300.

"When you talk to policymakers and stakeholders about sea-level rise, they mostly focus on what will happen up to 2100. There are very few studies beyond that," says Hélène Seroussi, the study's first author and an associate professor in Dartmouth's Thayer School of Engineering.

"Our study provides the longer-term projections that have been lacking," she says. "The results show that beyond 2100, the long-term impact for the regions most susceptible to sea-level rise become amplified."

The researchers modeled how Antarctica's ice sheet would fare under both high- and low-emission scenarios through 2300, says Mathieu Morlighem, a Dartmouth professor of earth sciences and a coauthor on the study. Dartmouth Engineering alumnus Jake Twarog '24 also is a coauthor of the study and contributed as an undergraduate.

"While current carbon emissions have only a modest impact on model projections for this century, the difference between how high- and low-emission scenarios contribute to sea-level rise grows sharply after 2100," Morlighem says. "These results confirm that it is critical to cut carbon emissions now to protect future generations."

The timing of when the Antarctica's glaciers would start retreating varied with the ice-flow model the researchers used, Seroussi says. But the speed with which large retreats occurred once a rapid loss of ice began was consistent among the models.

"All the models agree that once these large changes are initiated, nothing can stop them or slow them down. Several basins in West Antarctica could experience a complete collapse before 2200," Seroussi says. "The exact timing of such collapses remains unknown and depends on future greenhouse gas emissions, so we need to respond quickly enough to reduce emissions before the major basins in Antarctica are lost."

The study could lead to further collaborative models that scientists can use to understand and resolve disparities in projections for regions with significant modeling uncertainties, or for the Greenland ice sheet, Seroussi says. Research and computing resources can then be focused on investigating outcomes that those multiple models predict as most likely.

"We're learning from the community of scientists what is going to happen," Seroussi says. "This collaboration means we have a better, more robust assessment of the uncertainty, and we can see where our models agree and where they disagree so that we know where to focus our future research."

###

 

A majority of Americans can’t recall most First Amendment rights



Strong support seen for Supreme Court reforms in Annenberg survey




Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania

Knowledge of Three Branches of Government 

image: 

Figure 1

view more 

Credit: Annenberg Public Policy Center




Less than half of Americans can name most of the rights protected under the First Amendment and under two-thirds can name the three branches of government, according to the Annenberg Constitution Day Civics Survey, released annually since 2014.

The Annenberg Public Policy Center’s nationally representative survey, conducted in May 2024 with about 1,600 U.S. adults, finds levels of public knowledge largely unchanged from 2023. As was true last year, most Americans could name only a single right guaranteed by the First Amendment: freedom of speech, provided by nearly 3 in 4 respondents.

The survey also found strong public support for several potential reforms to the U.S. Supreme Court, including term limits, mandatory retirement ages, and prohibiting justices from participating in cases in which they have “personal or financial interests.”

Highlights

The 2024 edition of the Annenberg Constitution Day Civics Survey, released annually to celebrate Constitution Day on September 17, finds that:

  • Nearly two-thirds of Americans (65%) can name all three branches of government.
  • Asked what specific rights are guaranteed by the First Amendment, nearly three-quarters of respondents (74%) name freedom of speech. The other four rights are recalled by far fewer people: the second most-often cited, freedom of religion, is named by just 39%.  
  • Over 80% of Americans support prohibiting Supreme Court justices from participating in cases in which they have “personal or financial interests.” Nearly as many people support creation of a formal ethics code for the court.
  • A little over half of U.S. adults know that Democrats control the Senate (55%) and that Republicans control the House of Representatives (56%).

“Civics knowledge matters,” says Kathleen Hall Jamieson, director of the Annenberg Public Policy Center. “Those who do not understand the rights protected by the Constitution can neither cherish nor invoke them; those who do not know which party controls the House and Senate may misattribute credit or blame for action or inaction.”

The Annenberg Constitution Day Civics Survey is a nationally representative survey conducted by the Annenberg Public Policy Center (APPC) of the University of Pennsylvania. This year’s online survey of 1,590 U.S. adults was conducted May 1-23, 2024, for APPC by SSRS, an independent research company. The margin of error is ± 3.3 percentage points at the 95% confidence level. For more information, see the full release and topline.

The branches of government and the First Amendment

The three branches: Nearly two-thirds of Americans (65%) can name all three branches of government, 13% can name two, 8% can name one, and 15% cannot name any, unchanged from last year.

The First Amendment: Respondents were asked if they could name the specific rights guaranteed under the First Amendment:

  • Three-quarters (74%) say freedom of speech
  • Under 4 in 10 (39%) say freedom of religion
  • Less than a third (29%) say freedom of the press
  • Over a quarter (27%) say the right to assembly
  • About 1 in 10 (11%) say the right to petition the government

Less than a third of respondents (30%) can name a majority of rights (three or more). Only 7% of respondents can name all five First Amendment rights, while 23% can name three or four, and about half (48%) can name one or two. About 1 in 5 people (21%) cannot name any.

Although 11% correctly say the right to petition the government, twice as many people (22%) incorrectly name the right to bear arms, which instead is protected by the Second Amendment.



Support for Supreme Court reforms

In recent years, surveys have shown declining trust and confidence in the U.S. Supreme Court. The Annenberg Public Policy Center’s Constitution Day Survey has found that from 2019 to 2022, confidence in the Supreme Court plunged 22 percentage points, from 68% to 46%. With this changing environment as a backdrop, the 2024 survey asked respondents about measures that have been discussed to reform the Supreme Court:

  • Prohibiting participation of justices with conflicts: 82% support prohibiting justices from participating in cases in which they have personal or financial interests.
  • Formal ethics code: 77% support creation of a formal ethics code for Supreme Court justices that allows for justices to be investigated if they are accused of an ethical violation.
  • Mandatory retirement age: 69% support requiring justices to retire by a certain age.
  • Term limits: 68% support setting a specific number of years for justices to serve instead of granting them lifetime appointments.
  • Public referenda: 47% support allowing the public to vote to overturn Supreme Court decisions on controversial issues.
  • Increasing the size of the court: 29% support increasing the number of justices on the current nine-member Supreme Court.

For findings on support for Supreme Court reform by political party and civics knowledge, see the full release.

Constitution Day

APPC releases the Annenberg Civics Knowledge Survey for Constitution Day, which celebrates the signing of the Constitution on Sept. 17, 1787. APPC’s initiatives to enhance civics education include Annenberg Classroom, which offers free resources for teaching the Constitution, and the Civics Renewal Network, a coalition of 43 nonpartisan, nonprofit organizations dedicated to improving civics education by providing free, high-quality resources for teachers. Among those resources: CRN’s Constitution Day Toolkit for teachers and an Annenberg Classroom series of award-winning videos, including the new “The Eighth Amendment: Cruel and Unusual Punishment.”

The Annenberg Public Policy Center was established in 1993 to educate the public and policy makers about communication’s role in advancing public understanding of political, science, and health issues at the local, state, and federal levels.


 

Cannabis and older adults: Poll shows current use patterns, beliefs and risks


Among people age 50 and up, 21% used cannabis in the past year and 12% partake at least monthly; signs of risky driving, potential addiction seen



Michigan Medicine - University of Michigan

Reasons for cannabis use among people age 50 and over 

image: 

Key findings from the National Poll on Healthy Aging about the reasons for using cannabis cited by people age 50 and over who report using cannabis at least once in the past year.

The poll is based at the University of Michigan Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation.

view more 

Credit: University of Michigan



Whether they’re using it for recreational or medical reasons, a sizable percentage of people in their 50s and older have smoked, eaten, drunk or applied to their skin at least one form of cannabis in the past year, a new poll shows.

In all, 21% of people age 50 and older said they used a form of cannabis that contains the psychoactive compound THC at least once in the past year, according to new findings from the University of Michigan National Poll on Healthy Aging. The poll report focuses on use of cannabis products with psychoactive amounts of THC, not CBD-only products.

More than half of those who used a cannabis product did so frequently: 12% of adults aged 50 and older said they did so at least once a month. Those aged 50 to 64, and those who are in fair or poor physical health, or in lower income households were more likely to report using cannabis at least monthly.

As for the reasons older adults use cannabis, many cited sleep (68%), help with pain (63%) or mental health (53%), and/or to relax or feel good (81%).

The poll also reveals potential risky behaviors related to cannabis use.

Among those who use cannabis at least once a year, 20% said they had driven a vehicle within two hours of consumption; many experts recommend waiting two or even three times that long. And the rate of such driving was even higher – 27% – among those who use cannabis at least once a month.

In addition, nearly half of older adults who use cannabis products at least monthly had not discussed their use with their health care provider. And more than 20% reported at least one sign of potential dependence on cannabis.

The poll is based at the U-M Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, and supported by AARP and Michigan Medicine, U-M’s academic medical center.

Erin E. Bonar, Ph.D., a U-M addiction psychologist who worked with the poll team on the report, says the findings suggest a need for action at the policy, clinical and community levels to identify those who may need treatment for cannabis addiction and to discourage driving or other risky behaviors after consumption.

“With some form of cannabis use now legalized in 38 states and on the ballot this November in several others, and the federal rescheduling process under way, cannabis use is likely to grow,” she said. “But as this poll shows, it is not risk-free, and more attention is needed to identify and reduce those risks.”

Bonar is a member of IHPI, the U-M Addiction Center and the U-M Injury Prevention Center as well as a professor in the Medical School Department of Psychiatry.

In addition to the national poll report, the team compiled data for Michigan adults age 50 and older compared with those in other states; a summary is available at https://michmed.org/JYJer and an interactive data visualization is available at https://michmed.org/4e2KW.

Cannabis potency and addiction: Views of all older adults

The poll team also asked all older adults – including those who don’t use cannabis – about their views of cannabis. The results suggest a need for more public awareness efforts, Bonar says.

People in their 50s and beyond may have familiarity with cannabis from decades ago, whether through direct use or indirect knowledge during a time when it was illegal for any use in all states. Because of this, the poll team asked whether they believe cannabis is stronger today than it was 20 to 30 years ago.

The vast majority – 79% -- of older adults said they thought this was true. But Bonar notes that this means 21% aren’t currently aware of the major increases in THC levels found in cannabis available today, compared with levels in the 1990s and before.

Meanwhile, 72% of all older adults said they believe people can become addicted to cannabis. But, Bonar notes, this means more than a quarter of older adults aren’t currently aware that research has shown conclusively that cannabis addiction is real and can affect someone’s life and health just as addiction to other substances can.

Importance of discussing with health care providers

For those who use cannabis, especially those who use it often, poll director Jeffrey Kullgren, M.D., M.P.H., M.S. says the poll findings show the importance of communicating with their health care provider about their use.

In all, 56% of those who use cannabis with THC at least monthly said they had spoken with their regular health care provider about their use. Most of them said they had brought the topic up.

Talking openly with a provider about use could help identify risky drug interactions, and spot those experiencing signs of cannabis dependence or addiction.

In all, 22% of those who use cannabis at least monthly said in the past year they had had to use more cannabis to feel the effect they wanted, and 21% said using the same amount of cannabis had less of an effect on them than it had before, while 17% said they had increased the amount or frequency of their cannabis use. Another sign of potential addiction – strong desires or cravings to use cannabis with THC – was reported by 13% of those who use cannabis at least monthly.

“Even if your doctor, nurse practitioner or pharmacist doesn’t ask if you’re using cannabis products, it’s important to offer this information, no matter whether you’re using it to address a physical or mental health concern, or simply for pleasure,” says Kullgren, a primary care physician at the VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System and associate professor of internal medicine at U-M. “Many prescription medications and over-the-counter drugs, as well as alcohol, can interact with cannabis and cause unexpected or unwanted effects. And there are only a few conditions where we have good evidence of a medical benefit from cannabis, though this could change with time.”

The current process at the federal level to change how cannabis is listed on the schedule of controlled substances may free more researchers to do studies of cannabis-derived products in clinical trials involving human volunteers. Right now, such research is very limited because of federal restrictions.

 

The poll report is based on findings from a nationally representative survey conducted by NORC at the University of Chicago for IHPI and administered online and via phone  n February and March 2024 among 3,379 adults ages 50 and older. The sample was subsequently weighted to reflect the U.S. and Michigan populations. Read past National Poll on Healthy Aging reports and about the poll methodology.

 

Harnessing the power of the sea for renewable energy



$12 million from Department of Energy will boost marine energy research




University of New Hampshire





DURHAM, N.H.—(September 11, 2024)—The Atlantic Marine Energy Center (AMEC), led by the University of New Hampshire, is working to develop the technology and skills that will help unlock the power of the sea as a renewable source of energy. A $12 million award from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) will advance those efforts by funding research, facilities and workforce development for the marine energy industry. 

“There’s a lot of energy in the ocean — it’s abundant and renewable,” said Martin Wosnik, professor of mechanical and ocean engineering at UNH and AMEC director. “Marine energy has unique attributes that make it an attractive energy source and we think we can harness some of that energy in a reasonably benign way without impacting the ocean too much. We are grateful for the Department of Energy’s continued investment in our expertise at UNH and AMEC to help develop it.”

The five-year DOE award — funded largely through the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law — will fund projects at UNH as well as at AMEC consortium institutions Stony Brook University, Lehigh University and the Coastal Studies Institute.  

UNH will make improvements to its marine energy facilities, which include a combined wave and tow tank and deep engineering tank on campus and the UNH Tidal Energy Test Site on the Piscataqua River beneath the Memorial Bridge between Portsmouth and Kittery, Maine. Use of these assets extends beyond UNH with researchers and technicians from industry and DOE National Labs traveling to campus to utilize UNH’s unique marine energy research infrastructure. 

A series of marine energy summer short courses taught at all four consortium institutions will aim to develop a workforce for this growing industry with “boot camps” for senior undergraduates and more in-depth, advanced courses for graduate students. 

“Marine energy development faces a growing need for a highly skilled workforce with an interdisciplinary yet specialized skillset,” said Wosnik. 

The DOE estimates that marine energy resources in the U.S. — from waves, tides, ocean and river currents — is equivalent to nearly 60% of all U.S. power generation.

UNH will also launch five research projects, among a total of 12 new projects across AMEC: 

  • Refining models that will test whether assumptions about tidal energy are transferable to other sites.
  • Modeling and testing wave energy converters for blue economy applications such as aquaculture.
  • Improving the performance of UNH’s wave-powered water pump for promoting growth rates in macroalgae (kelp) aquaculture.
  • Improving the design of mooring systems for marine energy and developing new guidelines for marine energy anchor system design.
  • Assessing marine energy system sustainability, economic and environmental benefits to microgrids on island communities.

In addition to the faculty researchers leading these projects, six UNH Ph.D. students will be involved. 

###

About UNH
The University of New Hampshire inspires innovation and transforms lives in our state, nation and world. More than 16,000 students from 50 states and 87 countries engage with an award-winning faculty in top-ranked programs in business, engineering, law, health and human services, liberal arts and the sciences across more than 200 programs of study. A Carnegie Classification R1 institution, UNH partners with NASA, NOAA, NSF, and NIH, and received over $210 million in competitive external funding in FY23 to further explore and define the frontiers of land, sea and space.

 

Path to prosperity for planet and people shrinking rapidly, scientists warn




Universiteit van Amsterdam





Our planet will only remain able to provide even the most basic standard of living for everyone in the future if economic systems and technologies are dramatically transformed and critical resources are more fairly used, managed and shared, a new report shows. The report is co-authored by over sixty leading natural and social scientists from the Earth Commission, led by the UvA’s Joyeeta Gupta, as well as Prof. Xuemei Bai and Prof. Diana Liverman. The report was published today in The Lancet Planetary Health.

The new research builds on the ‘Safe and Just Earth System Boundaries’ published in Nature last year, which found that most of the vital limits within which people and the planet can thrive have been surpassed. The new paper identifies the ‘Safe and Just Space’ - within which harm to humans and nature can be minimised while ensuring everyone can be provided for - and sets out the paths to reach and stay in such a space. 

Already shrinking

But future projections to 2050 show that this space will shrink over time, driven by inequality, unless urgent transformations take place. The only way to provide for everyone and ensure societies, businesses and economies thrive without destabilising the planet is to reduce inequalities in how critical Earth system resources, such as freshwater and nutrients, are accessed and used - alongside economic and technological transformation. 

The new work found that inequalities and overconsumption of finite resources by a minority are key drivers of this shrinking. Providing minimum resources for those who don’t currently have enough would add much less pressure on the Earth system than that currently caused by the minority who use far greater resources.

Joyeeta Gupta: ‘We’re beginning to realise the damage that inequality is doing to the Earth. Increasing pollution and poor management of natural resources is causing significant harm to people and nature. The longer we continue to widen the gap between those who have too much and those who don’t have enough, the more extreme the consequences for all, as the support systems which underpin our way of life, our markets and our economies begin to collapse.’

A life free from poverty

If the Earth System Boundaries represent the “ceiling”, above which Earth systems can no longer remain stable and resilient, and significant damage could be caused to people and nature, the Safe and Just Space represents a “foundation”, showing us the minimum the global population needs from the Earth system, in order to live a life free from poverty. The space in between is full of opportunities that we can use to ensure a better future for people and planet.

To reach this space, the paper calls for change in three areas. Firstly, a push for changes to how we run the economy, finding new policies and funding mechanisms that can address inequality whilst reducing pressure on nature and climate. Secondly, more efficient and effective management, sharing and usage of resources at every level of society - including addressing the excess consumption of some communities which is limiting access to basic resources for those who need them the most. Thirdly, investment in sustainable and affordable technologies, which will be essential to help us use fewer resources and to reopen the Safe and Just Space for all - particularly where there is little or no space left. 

Gupta: 'It remains possible for all humans to escape poverty and be safe from harm caused by Earth system change - but the planet’s ability to provide and protect is being stretched past its limits.'

 

Impact of climate change on agriculture suggests even greater challenges to the environment, global food supply and public health



Columbia University's Mailman School of Public Health





September 12, 2024-- A sweeping global research review of the links between climate and agriculture reveals the likelihood of an emergent feedback loop whereby, as climate change puts more pressure on the global food supply, agriculture will, by necessity, adopt practices that may exacerbate its environmental impact.  This research, published in Science, includes an extensive evaluation of experts, including from Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health. The paper also identifies new agricultural practices that have the potential to increase efficiency and stabilize our food supply in the decades to come. 

The authors point out that greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture are now 18 times higher than they were in the 1960s, accounting for about 30% of global warming. Excess fertilizer left on farm soil is broken down by bacteria to form nitrous oxide, a greenhouse gas that is 300 times more potent than carbon dioxide. Strategic efforts to reduce the warming impact of agriculture while maintaining high yields are essential to both mitigating climate change and protecting our food supply from its impacts.

“It is important to recognize that the impact of agriculture on public health, from pesticide usage to water quality, is almost certainly going to be exacerbated with climate change,” said Lewis Ziska, PhD, associate professor of Environmental Health Sciences at the Columbia Mailman School of Public Health and a co-author. 

The research found:

  • Climate change has broad-ranging impacts on agricultural practices, increasing water use and scarcity, nitrous oxide and methane emissions, soil degradation, nitrogen and phosphorus pollution, pest pressure, pesticide pollution and biodiversity loss. 
  • Climate-agriculture feedback pathways could dramatically increase agricultural greenhouse gas emissions. Without changes in agriculture, this feedback loop could make it impossible to achieve the Paris Agreement goal of limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius to 2 degrees Celsius.
  • Existing sustainable agricultural practices and technologies, if they are implemented on a wide scale, can greatly reduce agricultural emissions and prevent a feedback loop from developing. To achieve this, governments must work to remove socioeconomic barriers and make climate-resilient solutions accessible to farmers and food producers.

“We need agriculture, but the future of humanity also requires that we reduce agriculture’s environmental harms,” said co-author David Tilman, a professor at the University of Minnesota College of Biological Sciences. “By evaluating new practices being tried around the world we have identified practices that appear to increase harvests while decreasing environmental harm. Once these new practices are tested and verified, we need a farm bill that pays farmers both for producing food and for improving the environment. Enabling better stewardship has tremendous benefits for all of us.”

The researchers looked at all aspects of the relationship between agriculture and climate to determine where new practices are the most effective. While carbon sequestration is currently a priority, an integrated approach that factors in farming efficiency and pollutants like nitrous oxide could deliver much larger climate benefits and a more stable future for agriculture. Practices such as precision fertilizer use and crop rotation can prevent a feedback loop from developing.”

The team identified a number of next steps. First and foremost, stakeholders should accelerate the adaptation and cost-reduction of efficient and climate-friendly agriculture. Precision farming, perennial crop integration, agrivoltaics, nitrogen fixation, and novel genome editing are among the emerging techniques that could increase production and efficiency in agriculture while reducing climate change impacts. They recommend further research on climate-agriculture feedback pathways and new technologies like on-farm robots.

See the paper for a complete list of co-authors and institutions.

This research was funded in part by the National Science Foundation.

About Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health

Founded in 1922, the Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health pursues an agenda of research, education, and service to address the critical and complex public health issues affecting New Yorkers, the nation and the world. The Columbia Mailman School is the fourth largest recipient of NIH grants among schools of public health. Its nearly 300 multi-disciplinary faculty members work in more than 100 countries around the world, addressing such issues as preventing infectious and chronic diseases, environmental health, maternal and child health, health policy, climate change and health, and public health preparedness. It is a leader in public health education with more than 1,300 graduate students from 55 nations pursuing a variety of master’s and doctoral degree programs. The Columbia Mailman School is also home to numerous world-renowned research centers, including ICAP and the Center for Infection and Immunity. For more information, please visit www.mailman.columbia.edu.