Showing posts sorted by date for query AMERICAN CONSPIRACY THEORY. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query AMERICAN CONSPIRACY THEORY. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Wednesday, May 20, 2026

When Black Mask Closed MoMA



 May 20, 2026

Ben Morea at the International Anti-Authoritarian Meetings of 2023 in Saint-Imier, Switzerland. Photograph Source: Antochkat – CC BY-SA 4.0

In Memory of Ben Morea

On the afternoon of October 10, 1966, six members of Black Mask, a radical anti-arts arts group, marched in front of New York’s Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) handing out leaflets while two members unraveled a large canvas sign announcing, “MUSEUM CLOSED.”

A handout published in Black Mask 1 (November 1966) read, in part, “A new spirit is rising.  Like the streets of Watts [i.e., August 1965 riot] we burn with revolution. We assault your Gods – We sing of your death. DESTROY THE MUSEUMS – our struggle cannot be hung on walls.” It continued, “Goddamn your culture, your science, your art. … What purpose do they serve? Your mass-murder cannot be concealed. The industrialist, the banker, the bourgeoisie, with their unlimited pretence [sic] and vulgarity, continue to stockpile art while they slaughter humanity.”

In an accompanying press release, the group clarified its concerns:

“This symbolic action is taken at a time when America is on a path of total destruction, and signals the opening of another front in the world-wide struggle against suppression. We seek a total revolution, cultural, as well as social and political – LET THE STRUGGLE BEGIN.”

The demonstrators were offended by MoMA’s exhibition, “Dada, Surrealism and Their Heritage,” which they felt violated the Dadaist and Surrealists very creative visions.

Museum executives, having been notified by Black Mask about the planned action, informed the police who put up two sawhorses to block the entrance, closing the facility.  According to one account, “a nervous and shifty-eyed mob of plain-clothed and uniformed policemen and newsmen [and] one FBI man with a small Japanese camera” observed the demonstration. As the scholar Conor Hannan notes, “Black Mask’s mock-closure of the Museum of Modern Art (MOMA) represents the first true meeting of art and social protest within the setting of 1960s New York.”

During the ‘60s, numerous arts groups emerged that expressed strong political beliefs, including the Art Workers Coalition, the Guerrilla Art Action Group (GAAG), Women Artists in Revolution (WAR), Black Emergency Cultural Coalition Inc. (BECC) and, most importantly, the Black Arts Movement.

Black Mask was different from the other political arts groups in two important ways. First, it drew its radical sensibilities from the post-WW-I Dada and Surrealist movements, a sensibility shared by groups like the Chicago Surrealists, the Amsterdam Provos, the San Francisco Diggers and the UK’s King Mob.  Second, it drew its theoretical or analytic perspective – i.e., its critique of the capitalist culture industry — from the radical Marxists tradition that included the Frankfurt School (e.g., Herbert Marcuse and Wilhelm Reich), the anarchist/ecologist Murray Bookchin (i.e., the concept of “post-scarcity”) and the French Situationist International, particularly Guy Debord (i.e., the concept of “the spectacle”).

At the center of Black Mask was Ben Morea (1941-2026), an abstract painter and vibraphonistwho moved to the East Village in the early ‘60s.  As he later reflected:

“I had been involved in jazz during my drug addiction days. I was a musician and every time I got out of jail I went back around the jazz world and got re-addicted . . . When I finally kicked for the last time . . . they put me in the prison hospital . . . in Roosevelt Hospital in Manhattan . . . There was an occupational therapist who befriended me . . . She was an art therapist, so I started painting.”

During this period, he hooked up with the Living Theater and, as he recalled, he “was highly influenced by their ideas despite never being theatrically orientated myself.”  Morea further explained, “they were the first people to put a name to the way I was feeling and leaning philosophically.”  During this period, Morea was introduced to artist Aldo Tambellini (1930-2020) and the radical arts community.

Tambellini, a painter, sculptor and poet who pioneered electronic intermedia, championed a belief that art had to break free from the confines of white-walled galleries.  In ’59, he moved to East 10th Street and began publishing a radical anti-art-institution mimeographed newsletter, The Screw, bearing the bold slogan, “Artists in an Anonymous Generation Arise.”  The Screw “was created to raise the social consciousness of artists,” Tambellini reflected. “In the newsletter, I voiced my objection to the manipulation I saw in the art establishment which used the artists as a commodity and financial investments rather than cultural entities.”  It included tracks like “Fuck the Tastemaker: Wall Street is making our art, the galleries are making our art … the critics are making our art. WHERE THE HELL IS THE ARTIST?” It challenged the commoditization of art.

Tambellini put his words into action by handing out copies of The Screw at “The Club” (a loft at 39 East 8th Street), a regular meeting space for New York School artists like Willem de Kooning, Robert Motherwell and Franz Kline.  On July 12, 1962, in an action anticipating Black Mask, he hosted “Event of the Screw” in front of MoMA.  He later reflected:

“There, in front of many artists who attended the “Event,” the media, and law enforcement, I dressed in a black suit and tie with a gold screw tie-clip, [and] read the “Manifesto of the Screw.” The Belltones, a Puerto Rican Trio from my neighborhood, also dressed in suits and ties, accompanied me by singing a cappella the “Song of The Screw” which I composed satirizing the conforming artistic “rules of the game.””

At the gathering, he awarded “Golden Screw Awards” – i.e., hardware screws dipped in gold paint — to museum officials as they entered the building.

In 1962, Tambellini, with Morea, Ron Hahne, Elsa Tambellini and Don Snyder, founded Group Center that sought to find new ways to display non-mainstream art.  The group organized a local, two-week arts festival in association with the Lower East Side Neighborhood Association at St. Mark’s Church-in-the-Bowery and, in June 1963, an outdoor sculpture show.

Works by Group Center artists were shown at two galleries: Quantum I, in December ‘64 at the Noah Goldowsky Gallery (1078 Madison Avenue), and Quantum II, in January ‘65 at the AM Sachs Gallery (29 West 57th Street). Morea turned to black paintings at the time of the Quantum shows. The New York Herald Tribune reported, “Benn Morea wants to show light emanating from darkness.”  Looking deeper, it adds:

“His ‘V-Box, I-Boc’ has two adjoining wall-hanging boxes painted black. Projecting cutout forms in the shape of circles, Vs, and bars jiggle electrically, revealing identical white forms behind. The mechanical device remains subordinate to the pictorial composition. He also shows two black floor boxes, about 30 inches square and one foot high. The top of each box is a black and white oil on paper, placed between two sheets of Lucite illuminated by a lightbulb inside.”

Morea’s paintings were strongly influenced by the work of both Tambellini and Jackson Pollock.

The scholar Nadja MillnerLarsen argues that Tambellini, Morea and others developed Black Zero, a live, mixed-media audiovisual collage that included contribution from jazz musicians (e.g., Bill Dixon), dancers (e.g., Judith Dunn) and writers (e.g., Ismael Reed), among others. It was to bea “community of the arts … [for] those vitally interested in the creative expression of man.”  Going further, they declared:

“We believe that the artistic community has reached a new stage of development. In a mobile society, it is no longer sufficient for the creative individual to remain in isolation. We feel the hunger of a society lost in its own vacuum and rise with an open, active commitment to forward a new spirit for mankind.”

They exhibited at East Village sites, public spaces and traditional galleries. Group Center condemned the commercialization of art as well as museums and galleries as elite institutions that separated the artist from ordinary people.

“His painting was very unusual,” noted Bookchin. “It consisted of vast panels of black. Swirling nebulae. Completely black.”  By 1966, Morea sought out new ways to realize his artistic vision, most notably through direct interventions and the publication of a radical mimeographed broadside, Black Mask.  As the poet Dan Georgakas announced,

“Poetry comes out of the Barrel of a Gun,

“Creative man does not entertain or shock the bourgeoisie. He destroys them!”

The group Black Mask believed in turning radical theory into activist practice.  On February 10, 1967, 25 masked men marched down Wall Street with a sign reading, “WALL ST. IS WAR STREET.”  In a handout, they declared:

“The traders in stocks and bones shriek for New Frontiers—but the coffins return to the Bronx and Harlem. Bull markets of murder deal in a stock exchange of death. Profits rise to the ticker tape of your dead sons. Poison gas RAINS on Vietnam. You cannot plead “WE DID NOT KNOW.” Television brings the flaming villages into the safety of your home. You commit genocide in the name of freedom. BUT YOU TOO ARE THE VICTIMS! If unemployment rises, you are given work, murderous work. If education is inferior, you are taught to kill. If the blacks get restless, they are sent to die. This is Wall Street’s formula for the great society!”

Noting their artistic backgrounds, they insisted: “We are not abandoning the cultural front but rather showing the interrelatedness of the struggle.”

Nevertheless, the group essentially abandon conventional artistic expression and, increasingly, engaged in direct action.  In October ’67, they joined over 100,000 protesters at the March on the Pentagon expressing opposition to the Vietnam War.  Morea and several others broke into the Pentagon and were beaten by U.S. soldiers. “It didn’t bring the world any closer to [betterment],” Morea shrugs. “We didn’t know if they would start shooting! They could have. We really thought they might.”

The next month, the Associated Press reported, “A riotous mob screaming ‘Peace’ battled police for control of Sixth Avenue tonight, as a violent anti-war demonstration against Secretary of State Dean Rusk spread half a mile along the busy midtown thorough-fare.” Rusk was in New York to attend a banquet of the Foreign Policy Association, but Black Mask members threw eggs, rocks and bags of cows’ blood at him as he slipped into the hotel unscathed.

In January ‘68, the group staged a mock-assassination of the poet Kenneth Koch at a poetry reading on St. Marks Place. “Koch was a symbol to us of this totally bourgeois, dandy world,” explained Morea. “We were determined to be outrageous in order to force people to decide where they stood on things.” An accompanying flyer made these views more explicit, charging, “[The] act was more poetic than anything Mr. Koch or his like could have read… We must use the poetic act to destroy poetry (as object/spectacle).”

In February, during the city’s garbage strike, Black Mask collected uncollected trash from the Lower East Side and dumped it into the fountains of Lincoln Center. In an accompanying leaflet, they proclaimed: “WE PROPOSE A CULTURAL EXCHANGE … garbage for garbage.” They held the demonstration the night of the opening of “bourgeois cultural event” and the episode was documented in Garbage, a 16-mm black-&-white film produced by Newsreel, a filmmaking collective founded in New York in 1967.

In the wake of the Paris uprising of May ’68, Black Mask morphed into Up Against the Wall Motherfucker (aka UAW/MF), a name appropriated from Amiri Baraka’s (aka LeRoy Jones) poem, Black People, which in turn refers to a repeatedly shouted command by the Newark, NJ, police at Black residents.

The Motherfuckers grew more aggressive in pushing their political demands.  Two episodes at the Fillmore East concert hall are most illustrative.  They forced the hall’s promoter Bill Graham, to let them use the hall for “Community Nights” on Wednesdays.  But the free concerts were short-lived.  On December 18, 1968, at an MC5 show, a disagreement between the Motherfuckers and Graham led to a standoff, with Graham standing at the front of the theater holding the Motherfuckers off.  A fist fight broke out and one of the Motherfuckers smashed Graham with a chain, breaking his nose.

The radical anti-arts movement reached its worst moment when, on June 3, 1968, Valerie Solanas, the author of S.C.U.M. Manifesto–an acronym for The Society for Cutting Up Men– and the play, Up Your Ass, walked into Warhol’s Union Square offices of The Factory with two guns and shot him three times; she also shot Mario Amaya, a visiting London gallery owner.  After fleeing the building, she turned herself in to the police.  The shooting caused great controversy and split the emerging second-wave feminist movement. 

Morea later discussed this incident, noting, “Valerie came up there [at Columbia University] and found me and asked ‘What would happen if I shot somebody?’ I said ‘It depends on two things – who you shoot and whether they die or not.’ A week later she shot Andy Warhol.”  He then elaborated:

“After she shot him I wrote a pamphlet supporting her. I may have been the only person who did that publicly. I went up to MOMA and handed it out there. Everybody I met was very negative about it, but, hey, I disliked Andy Warhol immensely and I loved Valerie. I felt she was right in her anger and that he was way more destructive than she was because he was helping to destroy the whole idea of creativity in art.”

MillnerLarsen reframes the incident, arguing that Solanas’s act implemented the Motherfucker’s notion of “’ARMED LOVE.’  To the Motherfucker’s, the shooting was symptomatic, not of a mental break, but of a desperation borne from the restricted economy of a patriarchal art world that systematically denied access to the ‘wretched of the earth.’”

By the late ‘60s, the Motherfuckers morphed into the International Werewolf Conspiracy and then the Family.  “We weren’t really hippies or politicos,” Morea reflected. “We were separate from other groups even though we were part of the wider counterculture. Some people would have placed us as hippies. … We also took a lot of LSD. Even though we were also radicals no one would have mixed us up with the Young Communist League. (laughter)”. Morea was under constant government surveillance and faced increasing legal troubles.  During this period, he was drawn to Native American imagery, championed the notion the native “warrior” and rejected the pacifism promoted by Abbie Hoffman and much of the New Left. Morea believed in, when appropriate, armed struggle. In ’69, he split from New York to the Southwest.

In 1964 and 196, Morea’s works appeared with those of Ad Reinhardt and Louise Nevelson, as well as of Louise Bourgeois and Meredith Monk in New York gallery shows.  In a 2016 review of his works at the White Column gallery in Chelsey, the Times quoted him, “I always painted in a semi-trance.”  Adding, “I just feel like I was able to tap into something powerful, an understanding that we were a speck in the universe.”  He went on to state: “I consider Pop Art capitalist realism and I detest it the same way most aesthetically minded people detest socialist realism.”

David Rosen is the author of Sex, Sin & Subversion:  The Transformation of 1950s New York’s Forbidden into America’s New Normal (Skyhorse, 2015).  He can be reached at drosennyc@verizon.net; check out www.DavidRosenWrites.com.

Saturday, May 16, 2026

 Thousands march in London for far-right, pro-Palestine protests


Police are patrolling the streets of London as thousands of protesters march in the UK capital on Saturday for two major demonstrations, the annual march to commemorate the Palestinian Nakba and a rally staged by British far-right activist Tommy Robinson.


Issued on: 16/05/2026 -
By: FRANCE 24 

Police forces stand in front of the far right Unite the Kingdom march in London on May 16, 2026. © Kirsty Wigglesworth, AP

Thousands of people began rallying in London Saturday at a march organised by far-right activist Tommy Robinson and a counter-demonstration fused with a pro-Palestinian protest, amid a huge police presence.

London's Metropolitan Police said ahead of the duelling events that it would mount one of its largest operations in recent years, as the British capital also hosts the FA Cup Final.

The force was set to deploy 4,000 officers – alongside horses, dogs, drones and helicopters – to manage Robinson's so-called "Unite the Kingdom" march and the rival rally marking Nakba Day.

That commemorates the 1948 displacement of Palestinians during the creation of Israel. It will combine with an anti-fascism march organised by the Stand Up to Racism group.


UK: Far-right rally meets pro-palestine counter-protest in London
© France 24
04:10



The Met police estimated 30,000 people would attend that event, setting off from west London, while 50,000 would be at the "Unite the Kingdom" march starting from Holborn in the heart of the capital.

Natasha, 44, was among those who had travelled in for Robinson's rally, wearing a bucket hat in the colours of Britain's Union Jack and draped in the flag.

"It's nice to be around my own culture," she told AFP near its start-point, calling the event "patriotic" and insisting "there's nothing racist about it".

Union Jack-wielding Justin, 56, from Essex, who declined to give his last name, echoed the sentiment. He said attendees were protesting "a whole load of stuff".

"Obviously immigration is a big part of it," he noted.


'Christian values'


Across London, Simon Ralls, 62, from Nottingham in central England, had turned out for the combined pro-Palestine and Stand Up to Racism event.

"The right (wing) are emboldened – we're here to try and counter that, make sure people aren't ignorant," he told AFP ahead of marching into the city centre.

Robinson – whose real name Stephen Yaxley-Lennon – is a former football hooligan turned anti-Islam activist whose profile has soared in recent years, in particular online.

Last September, he drew up to 150,000 people into central London for a similarly themed rally proclaiming "national unity, free speech and Christian values" – an unprecedented turnout for an event organised by a far-right figure.

He has tapped into growing public anger over tens of thousands of migrants crossing the English Channel each year in small boats, wider immigration policies, alleged free speech curbs and other issues.

X owner Elon Musk addressed that gathering via video-link. The rally shocked mainstream Britain for its scale and raw messaging, as well as clashes between some participants and police which injured dozens of officers.

The Met has imposed various conditions on Saturday's two rallies, over their routes and timings, in a bid to keep rival attendees apart.

The force, which estimates the operation will cost £4.5 million ($6 million), warned it would adopt "a zero-tolerance approach".

That includes for the first time making organisers legally responsible for ensuring invited speakers do not break hate speech laws.

Officers arrested two men Saturday morning arriving for the Robinson rally who were wanted on suspicion of grievous bodily harm following an incident in Birmingham, central England, when "a man was run over". No further details were provided.

'Hatred and division'

Prime Minister Keir Starmer warned Friday that "anyone who sets out to wreak havoc on our streets, to intimidate or threaten anyone ... can expect to face the full force of the law".

He accused the organisers of Robinson's rally of "peddling hatred and division".
'Violence, hoolig
anism, fraud: Far-right populist Nigel Farage regards Tommy Robinson as too fringe'

© France 24
08:06



Robinson has urged his attendees not to wear masks or drink excessive alcohol, and to be "peaceful and courteous".

Police have voiced fears about football hooligan groups which have previously supported Robinson showing up.

Meanwhile the FA Cup Final between Chelsea and Manchester City kicking off at 4 pm (1500 GMT) could strain the policing operation.

The Met has said live facial recognition would be used for the first time to police a protest.

Meanwhile, the government blocked 11 "foreign far-right agitators" from entering Britain for Robinson's rally.

They include US-based "extremist" Valentina Gomez, who the government said is "known for using inflammatory and dehumanising rhetoric about Muslim communities".

Saturday's rival demonstrations follow a spate of violent attacks targeting London's Jewish community, with some blaming instances of hate speech at pro-Palestinian marches for helping to fuel antisemitism.

The UK's terrorism threat level was raised two weeks ago to the second-highest level of "severe", with security officials citing the "broader Islamist and extreme right-wing terrorist threat".

(FRANCE 24 with AFP)



MEP and far-right influencers barred from UK rally: Who are they and what was the reason?

Demonstrator stands on head of lion on the side of the Westminster Bridge, during a Tommy Robinson-led Unite the Kingdom march and rally in London, 13 September 2025.
Copyright AP Photo


By Estelle Nilsson-Julien
Published on 

The UK government barred seven indivdiuals from entering the UK, stating that their presence is "not conducive to the public good". But on what grounds and what does this decision mean in practice?

At least seven individuals — including multiple figures with ties to Europe's far-right — have been barred from attending a rally organised by far-right activist Tommy Robinson in central London on 16 May.

A number of those barred by British authorities were set to address crowds at the "Unite the Kingdom" march, but the Home Office declined their electronic travel authorisation (ETA), a system brought in earlier in 2026 that, once granted, allows visa-exempt foreign nationals to visit the UK multiple times over a period of two years.

Shabana Mahmood, the home secretary, said that they were banned because their presence in the UK is "not conducive to the public good".

Eva Vlaardingerbroek and Ada Lluch, influencers and commentators from the Netherlands and Spain, respectively, as well as Flemish MP Filip Dewinter and Polish MEP Dominik Tarczyński, shared news of their reported bans on social media, along with screenshots notifying them of the decisions.

The Metropolitan police has warned organisers of the rally that they will be held responsible if speakers spread hate speech during the event, which attracted more than 100,000 attendees last year and led to 25 arrests and two dozen injured officers.

According to the force, the 2026 event is set to mark "one of the busiest days for policing in London in recent years", coinciding with a demonstration in solidarity with the Palestinian Nakba Day and the FA Cup Final at Wembley Stadium.

A heated response

Several US figures say they have also been denied entry to the UK, including commentator Joey Mannarino and MAGA influencer Valentina Gomez, who spoke at last year's rally.

While British Prime Minister Keir Starmer did not reveal the identity of the individuals who had been banned, he described them as "far-right agitators."

In a statement shared on 15 May, he stated that his government would not stand in the way of peaceful protest, but that it would "ban those coming into the UK" to stir up violence.

In another speech made on 11 May, he said, "We will not allow people to come to the UK, threaten our communities, and spread hate on our streets."

The decision to ban speakers from attending this year's edition has paved the way to online speculation and debate, with many arguing that the move is an affront to freedom of speech and an individual's right to criticise migration policies.

Taking to X, Tommy Robinson, whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon and who has multiple criminal convictions, stated that the UK government was "banning Americans en masse" from entry to the country.

Robinson contrasted the ban with the fact that "thousands" of so-called "invaders" are "chaperoned in every week and put up in hotels!", making an inflammatory reference to immigrants and asylum seekers.

He has long been a critic of Starmer's immigration policy and has repeatedly spread false claims and conspiracy theories about migrants and Muslims in the UK.

Who are the banned individuals and what have they said?

Tarczyński, an MEP from the European Conservatives and Reformists Group, has vowed to "sue" Keir Starmer in response to his ban should the prime minister ever leave office.

"Not the government, not the Home Office, but Starmer personally", he said on X on 12 May.

Tarczyński is known for his staunch anti-immigration stance as well as controversial statements, including that Poland should not take in a single Muslim immigrant.

In 2019, he stated, "We don't want Poland being taken over by Muslims, Buddhists, or someone else…"

"For me, multicultural society, it’s not a value," he added. "Christian culture, Roman law, Greek philosophers, these are the virtues for us."

Ada Lluch is a 26-year-old Catalan activist and influencer, who has attracted controversy for nationalist and anti-immigration views, having previously made controversial statements about Spain being "better off" under Spanish dictator Francisco Franco in posts shared on X in 2024, as reported by El País.

Following the ban, Lluch wrote on X: "One of the reasons Keir Starmer said he banned us from entering the UK is because we don't bring solutions to the problems. I think the solution is obvious: WE WANT REMIGRATION. AND WE WANT IT NOW!"

"Remigration" is a slogan frequently employed by parts of Europe's far-right. Proponents say that it's a form of immigration control in response to rising migration levels, but critics, including human rights groups and legal experts, have described it as discriminatory and racist.

The US-based non-profit Global Project Against Hate and Extremism describes it as a "white supremacist policy concept" that calls for the mass forced removal of immigrants, refugees, and their descendants based on race, ethnicity, culture, being perceived as "non-white," or a failure to "assimilate".

The concept has been linked by researchers to the far-right "Great Replacement" theory, which suggests that Western civilisation is threatened with an irreversible decline, due to falling birth rates and an influx of migrants from the Middle East and North Africa.

Tommy Robinson speaks during the Unite the Kingdom march and rally, London, 13 September 2025 Joanna Chan/Copyright 2025 The AP. All rights reserved


Dutch political commentator Eva Vlaardingerbroek has previously declared: "They are demanding the sacrifice of our children on the altar of mass migration. Let's not beat about the bush — this is the rape, replacement and murder of our people … Remigration is possible, and it’s up to us to make it happen."

Vlaardingerbroek was first notified that her ETA had been withdrawn in January, days after she accused Starmer of allowing "the ongoing rape and killing of British girls by migrant rape gangs".

Flemish MP Filip Dewinter, who qualified Starmer's government as "communist", was embroiled in controversy in 2015, after he shared an X post which stated that the word "racist" was no longer an insult but had become a "title of honour."

Dewinter included the hashtag #ikbenracistendaarbenikfierop in the post, which translates as "I am a racist and proud of it" — before deleting it.

In her speech made at last year's event, 26-year-old Colombian-American influencer Valentina Gomez told the crowd that "rapist Muslims" were "taking over" the UK.

"England, they took your guns, they took your swords, and they raped your women," she said. "You have nothing else to lose, but there's still hope. You are still the majority. So you either fight for this nation or you let all of these rapist Muslims and corrupt politicians take over."

Gomez has repeatedly made anti-Muslim statements, sharing an X video depicting her burning a Quran in August 2025, stating, "your daughters will be raped, and your sons beheaded — unless we put an end to Islam once and for all."

Why have the far-right commentators been banned?

While the Home Office did not confirm why any of the individuals have been banned from the UK, we can look at the country's existing rules to see what kind of behaviour constitutes a refusal.

The UK government can refuse entry for a wide range of reasons, from past criminal convictions, visa violations or, as in this instance, due to their presence not being "conducive to the public good." This was the reason cited by Home Secretary Mahmood.

Contrary to online claims, refusing entry on these grounds is not exclusive to Starmer's current Labour government.

According to a research briefing published by the House of Commons library, past successive Conservative governments have predominantly used visa bans to bar extremists and "hate preachers" from entry, with a focus on Islamist figures accused of supporting terrorism or sectarian violence.

However, other kinds of individuals were also banned under the Conservatives. For instance, in 2013, the UK's then-home secretary, Theresa May, banned two US bloggers, Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer, from entering the country, citing their stance against Islam.

Between May 2010 and December 2022, successive home secretaries under the Conservatives ordered the exclusion of 369 people from the UK, averaging approximately 30 cases per year, according to annual reports on the use of anti-terrorism powers.

Therefore, claims portraying the policy as unique to Starmer's Labour government — which came into power in July 2024 — are misleading, as such measures were already in place under previous Conservative prime ministers.

According to the "Counter-terrorism disruptive powers report", 15 individuals were excluded from the UK in 2024, because their presence in the UK was considered not conducive to the public good.

Across social media, those opposing the visa ban have claimed that freedom of speech is no longer protected in the UK.

However, UK law stipulates that freedom of speech is protected under Article 10 of the Human Rights Act 1998, which incorporates the European Convention on Human Rights. Nevertheless, it also explicitly allows governments to limit free speech to prevent crime or for national security matters.

The 1986 Public Order Act, amended by the Racial and Religious Hatred Act 2006, criminalises rhetoric which incites racial or religious hatred. This includes using "threatening" words or behaviour, or distributing material which intends to stir up religious hatred.

People demonstrate during the Tommy Robinson-led Unite the Kingdom march and rally, London, 13 September 2025 Joanna Chan/Copyright 2025 The AP. All rights reserved

Tommy Robinson, a divisive figure

While Robinson has taken to X to urge participants at the 2026 rally to engage in peaceful protest, he has previously faced repeated criticism for his rhetoric, notably using the term "invaders" to refer to asylum seekers

Separately, he has spread misinformation about migrant communities, for instance, sharing false claims about the perpetrator of the July 2024 Southport attacks.

He alleged that the attacker who killed three girls in a Taylor Swift-themed dance class was a Muslim asylum seeker who had just arrived in the UK on a small boat.

In reality, the 17-year-old perpetrator was born in Cardiff, Wales, to Rwandan parents and had no known connection to Islam. False claims about the suspect helped fuel mass rioting and marked the largest flare-up in violence in England since the 2011 riots.

At last year's edition of the rally, a video address by tech billionaire Elon Musk, who has also routinely amplified hardline criticism of Starmer's stance on immigration, was condemned by Downing Street, after he told the crowd "violence is coming" and "you either fight back or you die".

Successive British governments have repeatedly struggled to reduce net migration, but the tide appears to be turning: during Labour's first year in office, migration to the UK fell by more than two-thirds in the year ending June 2025 — the lowest annual figure since 2021, according to the Office for National Statistics (ONS).

The UK's 204,000 net migration figure sharply contrasts with the recorded peak of 944,000 in the year ending March 2023, under the previous Conservative government. This roughly 80% fall was mainly driven by fewer arrivals for work and study reasons, according to the ONS.

A 2025 study by the Migration Observatory at the University of Oxford states that it's difficult to compare conviction and incarceration rates among British and non-British citizens because there are no reliable statistics on the size of the population.

However, the available statistics do reveal some trends. For example, young adults are more likely to commit crimes regardless of nationality; when controlled for age or sex, non-UK citizens are underrepresented in the prison population; and non-Brits are overrepresented among offenders for drug offences, but underrepresented for robbery or physical violence, according to the study.