Showing posts sorted by date for query CASABLANCA. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query CASABLANCA. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Monday, August 10, 2026

Morocco:

New escalation of repression in the face of rising resistance


Monday 10 August 2026, by Marouane




Since the autumn of 2025, the Moroccan regime has considerably hardened its repressive policy, which simultaneously hits the GenZ movement, rappers, journalists, content creators, the student movement, the world of work, unemployed graduates as well as local mobilizations for access to basic public resources and services.

Marouane

1. The main manifestations of the new wave of repression

The main target of this offensive are the young people mobilised within the GenZ movement: there have been more than 5,000 arrests since the end of September 2025 and around 2,000 people were still detained at the beginning of April 2026. Prison sentences of up to fifteen years have been handed down, including against minors. In addition, three young people were killed with live ammunition by the Royal Gendarmerie in the Lakliaa region, near Agadir. The repression also affects the diaspora, with arrests at the airport for simple publications.

Several rappers have been prosecuted or convicted because of their songs or their critical positions on social networks. Jawad Asradi (“Pause Flow”) was sentenced in November 2025 to three months in prison, suspended, Hamza Raid to six months in prison, suspended. In Fez, 20-year-old Souhaib Qabli (“L7ASSAL”) was sentenced in March 2026 to eight months in prison. In July 2026, rapper and director El Mahdi Lyoubi (“Mehdi Black Wind”"), known for his support of the GenZ movement, was arrested and placed in pre-trial detention. The crackdown is also targeting content creators and influencers, aiming to create a climate of surveillance and self-censorship on social media.

Attacks on freedom of expression

The independent press remains one of the government’s permanent targets. Ali Lmrabet, a 66-year-old French-Moroccan journalist, is a historical figure in the independent press who was already imprisoned in 2003 and then banned from working for ten years. Arrested on 12 July 2026 at Tangier airport on his return from Spain, he was placed in police custody and then referred to the prosecutor’s office for “alleged dissemination of false information undermining constitutional institutions”, on the basis of several wanted notices. He was released on 15 July as the defamation investigation continues. According to his own testimony, more than thirty arrest warrants have been issued against him by the public prosecutor’s office.

Omar Radi is also one of the leading figures of the independent investigative press in Morocco, embodying the excesses of state repression against dissenting voices. After spending four years behind bars, he was released on 29 July 2024, but he continues to face systemic surveillance and pressure as well as a smear campaign on media outlets close to the Moroccan secret services that severely limit his freedoms.

The hardening of authoritarianism is accompanied by a growing repression of the media sector. The concentration of media ownership in the hands of capitalist groups linked to the government, the capture of public aid for their benefit and the resumption of control of the institutions responsible for supervising the profession reinforce political control over the media landscape. This offensive has resulted in the establishment of a provisional commission to manage the National Press Council, the revision of its legal framework and revelations of manipulation in the allocation of press cards, in disregard of professional criteria, all of which are intended to reduce the independence of the profession and the spaces for critical expression.

Critical artists are also targeted. In February 2026, cinema distributor Zineb Kharroubi was given a six-month suspended prison sentence. The young cartoonist Yasser (22) was arrested in Morocco in mid-June 2026 because of his critical cartoons.

The right of association systematically flouted

The right of association is systematically flouted by the authorities. In addition to illegal administrative obstructions – refusal to issue deposit receipts, blocking the registration procedures of associations, their sections or the renewal of their bodies – there is also a ban on meetings, training, conferences and other associative activities aimed at reducing civic space and weakening independent organisations. These practices target a wide range of political, trade union, community and human rights organizations. Among the many cases identified are the National Association of Unemployed Graduates of Morocco (ANDCM), active since 1991, ATTAC CADTM Morocco, deprived of the renewal of its legal receipt despite its existence since 2000, as well as the Moroccan Association for Human Rights (AMDH), dozens of whose sections remain without a deposit receipt.

This policy also extends to international human rights organizations, whose activities are routinely banned or prevented in Morocco. Organisations such as Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch and Transparency Morocco have been repeatedly restricted, while international observers and lawyers have been expelled on several occasions.

This situation led to the creation, in 2015, of the Network of Associations Victims of Prohibition (RAVI), which brings together organizations confronted with refusal of receipts, bans on activities and other forms of administrative repression. Its reactivation in 2026 testifies to the persistence, even the aggravation, of these attacks on associative freedoms. In this context, the RAVI organized a national demonstration in front of Parliament on 15 July 2026 to denounce these practices and demand the effective respect of freedom of association and assembly.

Despite the diversity of the profiles targeted, these cases have the same feature: the use of deliberately vague criminal qualifications, such as “attacks on institutions” or “dissemination of false information”, making it possible to prosecute people with very different profiles.

Social movements in the face of increased repression

The repression of student mobilizations at the Ibn Tofaïl University in Kenitra since the beginning of 2026 has explicitly targeted the movement’s trade union organization: ten students have been sentenced to two months in prison and 18 excluded. The latter staged an open sit-in in front of the Ministry of Higher Education in Rabat, which was harshly dispersed by police on 25 June 2026.

The struggle of workers at the Sicomec textile factory is systematically confronted with brutal repression every time they toughen their forms of struggle, whether in Meknes or Rabat, in front of the ministries concerned by their case. More than 500 workers were dismissed without compensation. For more than three years, they have been conducting a sit-in to demand respect for their rights and a just end to their struggle. The authorities responded to their demands with repeated police interventions aimed at breaking their mobilization and discouraging the continuation of their struggle.

The Hirak in Figuig is a popular mobilization carried out without interruption by the inhabitants of this oasis since 26 October 2023 against the transfer of the distribution of drinking water and electricity to a Regional Multiservice Company (SRM), which they consider a step towards the privatization of their water, a resource historically managed collectively. This movement was marked by a judicial repression targeting several of its figures. Mohamed Brahmi, known as “MoVo”, was sentenced on appeal to eight months in prison on charges related to his involvement in the Hirak, while Halima Zaid was given a six-month suspended prison sentence and a fine for speaking at a demonstration. In May 2025, Mohamed Brahmi and Redouane Marzouki were arrested again following a protest before being acquitted. Despite this repression, the Hirak continues its mobilization through sit-ins and weekly marches organized every Friday.

For nearly two years, the inhabitants of the Oulad Rami village, in the rural commune of Sidi Aïssa Ben Slimane (El Kelâa des Sraghna province, Marrakesh region), have been leading a mobilization against the operation of a stone crushing quarry, which they consider a threat to their health, their environment and their livelihoods. After several sit-ins remained unanswered, the courts authorized the resumption of the operation. On 24 March 2026, the execution of this decision led to a violent intervention by the repressive forces, resulting in numerous injuries and several arrests among the demonstrators.

The diversity of the sectors targeted reveals a coherent strategy aimed at reducing all the spaces for social, political and cultural contestation. This new escalation of repression does not, however, constitute a rupture. It extends a long tradition of authoritarian management of social conflicts in Morocco.

2. A repression inscribed in a historical continuity

This sequence is part of a longer history of territorial mobilizations in Morocco. Among the most emblematic are Imider’s fight against the exploitation of the country’s largest silver mine, where residents have occupied the facilities supplying the mine with water since 2011; the Rif Hirak (2016-2018), triggered after the tragic death of Mouhcine Fikri and followed by a massive crackdown that led to hundreds of arrests and heavy sentences, including twenty years in prison for several of its main leaders, including Nasser Zefzafi and Nabil Ahamjik; as well as the Jerada Hirak (2017-2018), which arose after the deaths of miners in clandestine coal pits and was also marked by a major wave of arrests and convictions.

The movement of unemployed graduates is also one of the most enduring examples of this repressive policy. Organized since 1991 within the National Association of Unemployed Graduates of Morocco (ANDCM), it remains active in several regions and continues to face an essentially authoritarian management of its demands, marked by police interventions, arrests and prosecutions against its activists. The persistence of this mobilization testifies to the extent of unemployment that affects a significant part of the young graduates in Morocco. Morocco’s dependent economy remains unable to provide opportunities for an ever-growing number of skilled workers. This impasse has fuelled the mobilizations of unemployed graduates around the right to work for more than three decades. It also contributes to making these young graduates one of the main breeding grounds for emigration. For many graduates, emigration appears to be the only prospect in the face of long-term unemployment, precariousness and an attack on dignity.

While popular movements remain the main targets of this authoritarian management of social conflicts, tensions are now spreading to other categories of actors. The reforms undertaken by the government are also sparking mobilizations within organized professions, as evidenced by the tug-of-war that has been taking place since the beginning of 2026 between the legal profession and the Ministry of Justice.

The unprecedented mobilization of lawyers

Since June 2026, the legal profession has been engaged in an unprecedented conflict with the Ministry of Justice over Bill No. 66.23, which undermines the independence of lawyers, their organizational autonomy, their immunity as well as the constitutional guarantees of the exercise of the right of defence. After a first week of national strike (15-21 June), the movement was renewed in the form of an unlimited general strike, accompanied by the suspension of legal aid. Entering its sixth week at the end of July 2026, it has caused an almost total paralysis of the courts. At the same time, the profession has multiplied its protest actions, including a national sit-in in front of Parliament on 29 June, before announcing an escalation through regional mobilisations, an appeal to the Constitutional Court and an international advocacy campaign to bring the issue of the independence of the profession before the world congress of the International Union of Lawyers (UIA). scheduled to take place in Marrakesh in October 2026.

3. The political drivers of the authoritarian crackdown

Morocco is preparing to co-host the 2030 World Cup with Spain and Portugal. It also hosted the 2025 African Cup of Nations. These events are part of a broader strategy aimed at strengthening the country’s attractiveness for foreign investment and tourism. In this perspective, the authorities seek to project the image of a stable, secure country with full control of its public order, which contributes to a toughening of the management of social protests and critical expressions. The generalization of control mechanisms and the strengthening of police powers are explicitly part of this logic of securing major events and flows, but also, more broadly, of guaranteeing a business climate considered favourable to investors, for whom security predictability and the absence of visible social protest are as important as macroeconomic indicators.

Security modernization accelerated by normalization with Israel

Since the December 2020 agreements, security and military cooperation between Rabat and the Zionist entity has moved to a global integration: transit of equipment for the occupying army through Moroccan ports, sale of intelligence technologies, cyber defence and surveillance drones. In addition, there is a rapid spread of so-called “smart” video surveillance in public spaces: several thousand fixed and mobile cameras were deployed in Rabat, Casablanca and other major cities for the 2025 African Cup of Nations. Presented as a tool for managing flows and “security”, this infrastructure remains just as capable of being mobilised for social control and the recording of gatherings. This normalization extends to many other sectors — economic, cultural, sports and so on. However, it continues to face massive popular rejection, initiated in particular by the Moroccan Front for the Support of Palestine and Against Normalization, which is leading to continuous demonstrations in the majority of Moroccan cities. Several sit-ins in solidarity with the Palestinian people have been violently repressed, including the most recent one held on Saturday, 18 July 2026 in Tangier. Meanwhile, several activists opposed to normalizing relations with Israel have been imprisoned or are facing legal proceedings.

The consolidation of authoritarian bourgeois power

The government coalition that emerged from the September 2021 elections brings together three parties — the National Rally of Independents (RNI), the Authenticity and Modernity Party (PAM) and the Istiqlal Party — liberal, monarchical bourgeois and closely rooted in business circles and the workings of the political system. Their coalition pact is based on a voting agreement in the legislature guaranteeing systematic support for executive bills and extended coordination to local authorities, ensuring homogeneous management at all levels of the country.

This political architecture extends a structural characteristic of the Moroccan bourgeoisie, which traditionally prospers thanks to the support of the state, through rent and clientelism. The racketeering born of the accumulation of political and economic mandates encourages nepotism in the awarding of public contracts, licenses and access to land to family networks historically close to power. This distribution is carried out under political protection, with the approval of a regime that also keeps the economic weight of this same social base under control. The head of government Aziz Akhannouch has an estimated fortune of $1.6 billion, or about 3.5% of the country’s public external debt at the end of 2024. He is among the very biggest Moroccan fortunes (according to the Forbes ranking of billionaires) — having held the top spot several times. It is a family wealth that he has strengthened since his appointment as head of government in September 2021.

4. A social offensive against the working classes

Beyond the attacks on public freedoms, the repression of the mobilizations is part of a more global offensive. It accompanies a neoliberal restructuring aimed at weakening social rights, making work more flexible and transferring the cost of crises to the popular classes.

Restriction of the right to strike

The organic law (No. 97.15) on the right to strike, adopted on 3 February 2025 after more than two decades of deadlock and published in the Official Bulletin on 24 March 2025, appears more as the result of pressure from employers than as the outcome of trade union demands. The leaderships of the main trade union federations, increasingly locked into the mechanisms of “social dialogue” and “social peace”, are also largely discredited in terms of their ability to defend workers’ rights or to obtain new gains. The General Confederation of Moroccan Enterprises (CGEM) has hailed this law as a step forward that has been awaited “for more than 60 years”, which says a lot about the interests it serves. Indeed, the text severely restricts the exercise of the right to strike by imposing a notice period, the holding of a general meeting with a quorum, by prohibiting the occupation of workplaces and by providing for heavy financial penalties. It is also accompanied by the maintenance of the possibility of criminal proceedings against the strikers, in particular on the basis of article 288 of the Criminal Code relating to “obstruction of the freedom to work”.

In addition, the CGEM is continuing its pressure in favour of extending the flexibility already introduced by the 2004 Employment Code. This orientation is reflected in particular in the generalisation of temporary work and the extension of contractualisation, including in the civil service, as well as a relaxation of the rules governing dismissals.

A regressive pension reform

A neoliberal-inspired reform project was presented by the National Commission in July 2025. This provides for the gradual increase of the legal retirement age to 65 for all schemes (compared to 60 in the private sector and 63 in the public sector today), the extension of the contribution period, the increase in contributions and the restructuring of funds around two poles. True to neoliberal recipes, this reform places the brunt of the adjustment on workers.

Public debt and structural austerity

The share of overall public debt in GDP rose from 56% in 2008, to 76% in the period 2012-2019 in the wake of the structural crisis of capitalism in 2008-2009, and then to 87% in the period 2020-2024 following the health crisis of the Covid pandemic. This increase is accompanied by a much more marked alignment of Morocco with the austerity policies advocated by the IMF and the World Bank, especially since the Covid crisis. It is reflected in increasingly restrictive debt service repayments, to the detriment of social spending — health, education, commodity subsidies — while subsidies and tax benefits granted to private capital continue, and in increased pressure for structural reforms (pensions, civil service reform, clearing, taxation, exchange rate liberalization) dictated by these two institutions.

This is happening at the same time as the infrastructure linked to major sporting events (stadiums, high-speed lines, airports) is mobilizing hundreds of billions of dirhams of public investment: hospitals and public schools are in chronic disrepair — this is precisely what the GenZ youth movement is denouncing. As a structurally dependent country, Morocco is suffering the repercussions of international crises. The Russian war against Ukraine, the wars in the Middle East and the tensions on the global energy and food markets have accentuated inflationary and budgetary pressures, used by the government to make the working classes bear the cost of these crises.

5. Conclusion

This repressive offensive reflects less the strength of the regime than its desire to prevent a worsening of social protests in a context marked by the rise in the cost of living, the deepening of neoliberal policies and the accumulation of inequalities. The criminalisation of dissent thus accompanies a wider attack on social and democratic rights.

Despite the scale of this offensive, the mobilizations are not disappearing. Territorial movements such as that of Figuig, workers’ struggles, student mobilizations, youth protests and demonstrations of solidarity with Palestine testify to a persistent social mobilization that continues to find new forms of expression.

However, this dynamic is developing in a context marked by the deep discrediting of the leaderships of the main trade union federations, which are largely integrated into the mechanisms of “social dialogue” and “social peace”, as well as by the organisational weakness of the radical left and its still limited presence in the main sectors of struggle. This double weakness today complicates the convergence of resistance and the construction of a balance of power on a national scale. However, the multiplication of mobilizations shows that authoritarian and neoliberal policies are not succeeding in sustainably containing popular aspirations for social justice and democratic freedoms, nor in preventing the emergence of new generations of activists and new forms of resistance.

28 July 2026

Translated by International Viewpoint from Inprecor.

Saturday, August 08, 2026

 

World’s biggest mining companies now worth $2.17 trillion


Reason to smile. Shift change at the George Fisher zinc, lead silver mine in Australia. Image: Glencore

At the end of July the MINING.COM TOP 50* ranking of the world’s most valuable miners had a combined market capitalization of $2.17 trillion, up $18 billion for the month and holding a gain of $26 billion so far in 2026.

The Top 50 now runs on a monthly clock, and on a new basis: mined metals and minerals only, with coal-heavy counters excluded and every ranking back to the start of the decade recalculated to match (the notes at the bottom set out the rules of the game).

The $545 billion swing

July was a good deal livelier than the 0.8% headline move suggests.

When mining stocks were riding high on gold and copper prices at the end of March, the Top 50 was worth $2.33 trillion. By the end of June, with gold well off its record, that had shrunk to $2.15 trillion.

Stock by stock, the swings are wilder still: valued at each company’s best month-end of the year, the Top 50 would be worth $2.44 trillion. At each one’s worst, just $1.9 trillion. That $545 billion spread is the truer measure of 2026 (and most every other year on commodities markets) so far, in a ranking that never itself strayed far from $2.2 trillion.

The biggest winner and the biggest loser in July were both gold diggers, and neither had much to do with bullion, which waited until August to stage a comeback.

Zijin’s third engine

Zijin Mining added $24 billion of market value in July, up 23.8%, vaulting past Newmont into fourth place at $125 billion. No company gained more dollars, and nothing in the company’s bracket came close on percentage either.

The trigger was a first-half profit alert lodged in early July: net profit guided at roughly RMB 39.1 billion, up 68%, with gold output up 15% to just over 1.5 million ounces and silver edging up to 7.4 million ounces. The number that stands out, though, is lithium: 43,000 tonnes of lithium carbonate equivalent against 7,000 tonnes a year earlier, a sixfold ramp pulled off just as the market for the battery metal emerged from a brutal slump.

Xiamen calls lithium the group’s third growth engine, and for once the investor-day language matches the production tables. Anyone reading Zijin’s surge as a copper story should note that consolidated copper output actually fell 6%. Less than a year after becoming only the fourth mining company in history to top $100 billion, Zijin is aiming for the podium.

Polyus pulls the rip cord

At the other end, Polyus surrendered $13.2 billion (down 37.6%) and fell eight places to number 28.

On 8 July the Russian gold miner told shareholders it would suspend dividends until 2030 to fund a wave of investment projects. The stock dropped 26% in a single session, the second-worst day in its history, beaten only by the 27.4% shellacking of 16 September 2008, when Lehman Brothers was setting the mood. It kept sliding for the rest of the month.

The decision baffled a market that watched Polyus mint record earnings and some $2 billion of free cash flow last year, and Sberbank promptly struck the stock from its top picks. One theory doing the rounds in Moscow: the company is bracing for a windfall tax on gold profits, and has budgeted for bullion at a deeply unfashionable $3,100 an ounce. Polyus and Norilsk Nickel, it should be said, keep their standing in this ranking thanks to captive investors on the Moscow Exchange where sanctions have made sellers of many, but exits are few.

Middle Kingdom kings

The rest of July’s winners column reads like a Shanghai gold board: Zhongjin Gold up 21.4%, Shandong Gold up 16.9%, and outside the ranking Chifeng Jilong up more than 50%. It looks like a surge. It is closer to a bounce. Gold spent the first half of 2026 falling roughly 30% from January’s record above $5,590 an ounce, and China’s gold stocks fell considerably harder. Shandong Gold’s peak-to-trough drawdown passed 60% before bargain hunters found a sector trading at around ten times earnings.

Western precious metals went the other way: Fresnillo gave back 10% of its value, Coeur 12.9% and Agnico Eagle 5%, while Newmont slipped just enough for Zijin to relieve Denver of fourth place.

Since this snapshot was taken, gold has bounced again, surging to a seven-week high above $4,400 on Friday after the US economy shed 23,000 jobs in July, the first payrolls contraction since February. Gold bugs will take the help.

Revolving door

The price of admission rose to $13.56 billion, from $13.1 billion at the end of June, not far off the record $14.5 billion set at the end of March and more than four times the $3.2 billion that got a company through the door in 2020.

Western Mining takes the fiftieth spot after a 41.5% July, the biggest percentage move anywhere in the ranking. Casablanca’s Managem, up 106% this year on its gold and cobalt mines across Africa, debuts at 39. Lundin Gold misses by a whisker and is likely back in by the time you read this, joining Tianqi Lithium, which dropped by a quarter, and Alamos Gold.

MMG returns at 49 after a 28.6% month, and South32 re-enters at 45, up 12.2% since agreeing to sell nearly all its aluminium business to Alcoa for up to $5.6 billion. The Perth miner also broke mining’s decade-long US permitting curse in early July, bagging the final federal approval for its $2 billion-plus Hermosa zinc-silver-manganese project in Arizona, with first production pencilled in for early 2028.

The metal that matters for the slimmed-down miner may turn out to be silver: once the Alcoa sale closes, Cannington’s silver-lead-zinc output becomes more than a tenth of revenue, and with silver near $60 an ounce (against under $40 a year ago) and zinc up 26% in 2026, the market is paying up for what South32 is keeping, not just what it sold.

Then there is Amman Mineral, the ranking’s resident rollercoaster. The Indonesian copper-gold miner stormed into the Top 50 after its blockbuster 2023 debut, ran up nearly 600% to pierce the top 10 (minting half a dozen billionaires along the way), then surrendered roughly three quarters of its peak value as smelter commissioning and concentrate headaches set in, bottoming out dead last at number 50 in the Q2 count. In July it rose 25.7% to reclaim 42nd.

Baar sets a higher bar

Two days ago Glencore reported the kind of first half that headline writers call blowout: adjusted EBITDA of $10.1 billion, up 86%, a fresh $500 million buyback, and confirmation of a secondary Sydney listing for October. Copper output rose 15% just as the metal hit records, and the trading desks feasted on a volatile oil market.

The July snapshot caught the run-up: up 7.6% for the month and 34% for the year at $86 billion, Baar is firmly ensconced at number 7. It is easy to forget Glencore spent stretches of 2020 and 2021 outside the top 10 altogether and traded below its 2011 London IPO price for the better part of fifteen years.

There is a wrinkle in the timing. The six-month standstill Rio Tinto accepted when it walked away from their $260 billion mega-merger in February lapsed this week, and Melbourne promptly signalled it is in no rush to come back to the table. On numbers like these, Baar can afford to play hard to get.

Rio arrives at the standstill’s end in decent shape of its own, having just posted its highest first-half earnings in four years as the data centre boom feeds copper demand. Though on this ranking’s own 1.5 times revenue test (see the notes below) Rio is, strictly speaking, an iron ore company enjoying editorial clemency. 

Vale gets no such pass. Filed under iron ore while the long-promised Toronto listing of its base metals unit waits, the Brazilian miner posted a 35% fall in second-quarter profit and narrowed its nickel and copper output outlook. 

The air up there

BHP has added $62 billion of market value in 2026, a 41% gain no other big cap approaches in dollar terms, reaching $216 billion and sitting comfortably above the double-century mark Melbourne was first to breach. July’s production report showed record iron ore output from the Pilbara, with full-year results due mid-month. 

The $50 billion of air between the world’s biggest miner and Rio Tinto (the unbroken pair at the top) is now the widest gap between first and second in the history of this ranking. It is a remarkable turn from 2024, when the lead had thinned to $15 billion. One stock accounts for a tenth of the Top 50’s entire value.

Club rules

Melbourne is where the money lives: BHP, Rio Tinto and MMG make the Victorian capital a $395 billion head-office town, nearly a fifth of the entire ranking. Toronto’s four entries are worth $204 billion, Mexico City’s two $177 billion, Denver’s three $156 billion and Vancouver’s five $141 billion.

The gap to Toronto vanishes the day Anglo Teck books its head office in British Columbia, and that day is drawing closer. The $53 billion merger has cleared its shareholder votes and every regulator bar one, waiting only on Beijing, with completion expected by early 2027. 

The corner offices are already settling: Anglo executives take three of the four top jobs, with Duncan Wanblad leading the combined group from Vancouver. Anglo shareholders will own 62.4% of the company after banking a $4.5 billion special dividend, and Teck investors 37.6%, with each Teck share exchanged for 1.3301 Anglo shares. For now, Anglo American and Teck ride at 13 and 21.

When the deal closes, the combined company also changes columns. Under the ranking’s rules Anglo Teck lands under copper, which is exactly how the pair are selling it: about 1.2 million tonnes of output a year, rising to 1.35 million tonnes in 2027 from six large operations across Chile, Peru and Canada, with $800 million in annual pre-tax savings pencilled in by year four. 

After a divestment program that has spun off its platinum arm, sold coal and nickel, and set De Beers on its way out the door, the reclassification makes it official: Anglo’s century-plus run as a diversified mining giant ends here.

The next count lands at the end of August. On July’s evidence, a month is plenty.


Wednesday, August 05, 2026

Rot from Within: The Palace-to-Street Silence Consuming the Arab World


 August 3, 2026

Photograph by Nathaniel St. Clair

The plight of Palestine has been the emotional heartbeat of the Arab imagination for decades.  From Casablanca to Baghdad, millions have chanted slogans, waved flags and wept over the dispossession of their Palestinian brethren.  Yet, when an industrial-scale invasion laid waste to Gaza, reducing neighborhoods to ash and children to statistics, the Arab world’s response to this ultimate crucible was a deafening unforgivable silence.

Across a fractured region of 450 million, armed with immense wealth, strategic geography and vast institutional power, the collective reaction to the unfolding horror was not intervention, economic warfare nor structural retaliation.  It was a paralysis born of cowardice, complicity and profound moral bankruptcy. The lofty rhetoric has proven to be nothing more than cheap poetry incapable of shielding a single child from a falling shell.

Passive Regimes:  To understand why millions “did not lift a finger,” one must first separate the Arab street from the Arab palace.  Across the Middle East, the general public is not indifferent; polling consistently shows overwhelming solidarity with Palestinians and a fierce rejection of normalization with Israel. The Arab world is, however, largely governed by a patchwork of autocrats, absolute monarchs and security states whose primary raison d’être is self-preservation, not pan-Arab solidarity.  For these regimes a politically mobilized populace is a far greater threat than an external aggressor.

Dictatorships do not survive by encouraging righteous indignation; they survive by stifling it.  Allowing mass demonstrations, organizing economic boycotts or deploying state power against Tel Aviv creates a dangerous domestic precedent. If citizens can force their governments to confront a foreign power, like Israel, over human rights, they might soon demand the same rights at home, as well as accountability for corruption, poverty and domestic political repression.

Consequently, the apparatus of modern Arab states has been weaponized not against Israel but against their own people.  Protestors are teargassed, activists are jailed and independent media is muzzled.  The ruling elites have calculated that maintaining their grip on power—often with the tacit or explicit backing of Western powers—is worth the moral price of abandoning Palestine.

The Myth of Normalization: Gone are the days when Arab states utilized their collective leverage, like the 1973 oil embargo, to alter geopolitical realities.  Today, petrodollars are funneled into vanity projects, Western real estate and high-tech surveillance systems, while the economic jugular remains untapped.

Even more damning is the rush toward normalization.  In recent years, a number of Arab potentates have chosen to bypass the Palestinian cause entirely, signing bilateral trade, security and intelligence agreements with Israel.  For these Arab states, technological cooperation and strategic alignment against regional rivals, like Iran, have trumped historical obligations to a stateless people.

Even after launch of the brutal military campaign in Gaza when public fury reached a fever-pitch, elite diplomacy largely boiled down to sterile communiqués, emergency summits that produced nothing but empty resolutions and theatrical humanitarian aid drops that acted more as public relations stunts than genuine relief.  They nibbled at the edges of a genocide while signing trade corridor agreements that kept Tel Aviv’s economy afloat.

Paralysis of the Street:  If the regimes are guilty of cold-blooded calculations, what of the 450 million people themselves?  Why did the Arab street not rise in a tidal wave that overthrew this paralysis?

Decades of systemic oppression, economic collapse, sectarian division and devastating civil wars (in Syria, Yemen, Libya and Iraq) have left populations exhausted and traumatized.  Societies fractured along ethnic and religious lines struggle to muster collective action for external causes, when daily survival—security, bread, electricity and basic safety—consumes all available energy.

The post-Arab Spring hangover instilled a deep-seated dread that with state collapse came anarchy, migration and foreign intervention, making citizens hesitant to challenge the heavy hand of the state.

Yet, exhaustion is an explanation, not an absolution.  A collective moral stain is suffered when comfort, compliance or quietism are chosen, while a nearby population is systematically annihilated.

Bankruptcy of Rhetoric:  For generations Arab demagogues have weaponized the Palestinian cause as a convenient rhetorical diversion to distract from domestic tyranny. When tested by real events, the grand promise of Arab unity evaporated,

showing the world it was merely empty talk without substance. Speeches at the United Nations, tear-soaked commentary and pious sermons have proven no substitute for economic leverage and political will.

Israel sustains its unrestrained regional misconduct supported by more than military superiority and Western alliances. It relies on an assessment that its Arab neighbors lack resolve and prioritize internal survival over collective action; that they are capable of grand gestures, but devoid of the valor required to impose a real cost.

Until the Arab world addresses its own internal rot, breaks free from authoritarian governance, and turns empty words into concrete actions, the blood of the innocent will remain an indelible indictment of a civilization that turned away.

Dr. M. Reza Behnam is a political scientist who specializes in comparative politics with a focus on West Asia.