Showing posts sorted by date for query DINOSAUR. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query DINOSAUR. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Friday, August 21, 2026

 

Paleontologists spent 20 years carbon-dating thousands of marine fossils, then used them to decode a process fundamental to Earth’s history




Florida Museum of Natural History
Image 1 

image: 

Scientists carbon-dated more than 7,500 marine fossils from ocean beds around the world and used that data to determine which environmental factors are most responsible for mixing together fossils from different time periods in the same stratum.

view more 

Credit: Florida Museum photo by Kristen Grace






Paleontologists spent 20 years carbon-dating thousands of marine fossils, then used them to decode a process fundamental to Earth’s history

Key points

  • Over the course of 20 years, an international team of scientists collected and carbon-dated more than 7,500 marine fossils from ocean beds around the world.
  • Scientists used the dataset to determine which of several environmental factors contributes most to time averaging, a phenomenon in which organisms that lived in different time periods are mixed and preserved together in the same fossil bed.
  • The results indicate that sedimentation is more important than other factors, such as the number of burrowing animals in a given area or the durability of fossils.
  • The study, published in the journal PNAS, establishes guidelines regarding the types of research questions paleontologists can investigate using fossil samples.

GAINESVILLE, Fla. --- In productive marine environments, a square meter of seafloor can be perforated by hundreds to thousands of isolated and interconnected tunnels through which crawl and writhe a cornucopia of clams, shrimp, sea stars, sand dollars, snails, worms and other animals. All that excavation mixes up the sediment, along with any shells and other skeletal remains that happen to be there. This temporal smearing is a problem for paleontologists, because when that piece of seafloor is buried and becomes part of the fossil record, it’s difficult and expensive to figure out how much mixing took place.

“What continually amazes me is just how much time a bunch of fossils collected from a single sediment layer can represent. In some cases, well-preserved fossil organisms that are found next to each other might have lived hundreds or thousands of years apart,” wrote Rafal Nawrot, a paleontologist at the University of Vienna.

The mixing of fossils that lived at different times but are preserved together is called time averaging.

According to Daniele Scarponi, a colleague of Nawrot’s and an associate professor at the University of Bologna, time averaging dictates the types of questions paleontologists can ask.

“Before interpreting a fossil assemblage, we need to know the interval it represents. Some fossil assemblages are like the ruins of Pompeii — buried rapidly and thus providing a snapshot of past communities frozen in time. Others are more akin to a prehistoric graveyard used continuously over centuries, in which human remains from different generations are slowly accumulating over time. Both types can provide valuable insights into the past, but the kinds of data we can extract from them will be different in each case,” Scarponi wrote.

In addition to burrowing animals, several other factors influence time averaging, including:

  1. The durability of organic material is important. Most organisms decompose or get picked apart by scavengers before they become fossilized. For this reason, both the marine and terrestrial fossil records are primarily composed of hard skeletal material, like shells and bones. But even these break and disintegrate if they aren’t preserved quickly enough.
  2. Another important factor is the rate of sedimentation, which occurs unevenly in different parts of the ocean and changes through time. Deltas, for example, have high rates of sedimentation, whereas other areas might only receive a fine dusting over long periods of time. If sedimentation is slow, skeletal remains of organisms accumulate over long periods of time, but if sedimentation is fast, the remains are buried quicker, and age mixing is reduced.
  3. Biological productivity is also crucial. The number of fossils paleontologists can expect to find while digging in one spot is strongly correlated with the number of organisms that were previously around to be fossilized in the first place.

Through a project that was 20 years in the making, members of an international consortium of scientists say they have determined which of these factors is the most important for time averaging and thus primarily controls the temporal resolution of paleontological data.

“Our results demonstrate that if we know how quickly sediment accumulates — which can be deduced from the environmental context — we can determine how much time is captured by a given fossil assemblage: The faster individual shells or bones are buried below the sediment surface, the less likely it is that remains from multiple generations of organisms will accumulate and be preserved together,” Nawrot wrote.

Sedimentation rates have long been anticipated to be an important component of time averaging, but gathering data needed to rigorously and comprehensively assess this issue is difficult, time-consuming and very expensive.

By integrating multiple projects, the authors analyzed more than 7,500 fossils, which were dated using radiocarbon and other methods and collected from a variety of oceanic environments around the world, from shallow coastal settings to the edges of continental shelves.

The various research groups involved in the project — which includes scientists based in Australia, Austria, the Bahamas, Brazil, Italy, Germany, Slovakia and the United States — separately collected, studied and published papers on the fossils over a period of two decades. When they learned of each other’s work, they decided to join forces and share data.

“Nothing of this scale has ever been attempted before because it’s simply not feasible to do so, but thanks to the fact that we had a whole bunch of teams that worked on similar topics and used similar methods, we were able to compile it,” said the study’s co-lead author, Michal Kowalewski, the Thompson chair of invertebrate paleontology at the Florida Museum of Natural History.

Radiometric dating, one of the primary methods the authors used, takes advantage of the fact that radioactive atoms always decay into more stable, non-radioactive atoms at a steady, predictable rate. This allows scientists to estimate the age of minerals and fossils.

Many animals have skeletons that contain a type of radioactive isotope called carbon-14. Plants absorb carbon-14 during photosynthesis and use it to make more of themselves. Herbivores get carbon-14 secondhand by eating plants, carnivores get it from herbivores, and decomposers get it from all of the above. This list includes humans. Any part of your body that contains carbon — which is every part of your body — is radioactive. Fortunately, carbon-14 emits radiation in the form of electrons, which for us is kind of like receiving a constant but imperceptibly low-level electric shock — not at all like the cell-shredding gamma rays emitted by uranium.

Carbon-14 has a half-life – the amount of time it takes for half of any given number of radioactive atoms to decay — of around 5,730 years. That meant the authors were restricted to the most recent fossil record, up to 55,000 years old, which is about the cutoff when any remaining carbon-14 in a fossil can be reliably measured.

The researchers also used a technique known as amino-acid racemization, which uses ratios of amino acids. As in the case of carbon isotopes, the ratio of different forms of a given amino acid also changes through time in a predictable way.

The reason no one has attempted dating on such a grand scale before is primarily due to the high cost of radiocarbon and amino-acid dating. Most research groups can afford to obtain data for only a few dozen specimens, but thousands of specimens are needed to fully evaluate the scale and drivers of time averaging. Distributing the cost across multiple labs over two decades helped significantly reduce this barrier, as did recent technological advances in radiometric dating that lowered the cost and made it possible to use much smaller samples than was previously possible.

Through this unique collaboration, Kowalewski and his colleagues have what is possibly the largest collection of fossil carbon dates ever compiled, which can now be used on a variety of research topics that would have been intractable otherwise.

“The dataset is incredibly powerful. We’re now working on multiple follow-up projects that explore various aspects of time averaging and related processes. You can use it to answer a lot of questions, but of course, we started with the big one,” he said.

After compiling the carbon dates from their fossil specimens, the authors simulated age distributions by varying the rates of bioturbation (mixing caused by burrowing animals), sedimentation and fossil destruction. Then they compared the real age distribution of carbon-dated fossils with the different simulated distributions to see which of the models most closely matched the actual patterns observed in the data.

The results were unambiguous.

“Sometimes life turns out to be more exciting than you thought,” Kowalewski said. “In this case, the outcome is beyond any dreams we may have had when we started.”

Knowing that the rate of sedimentation is the single most important factor in determining the extent to which fossils of different ages become mixed will unlock research avenues that were previously restricted. And assuming the same pattern holds true for oceans further back in time, the results can be extended to fossils that are much older than the ones that still contain residual amounts of carbon-14.

The authors published their results in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Additional co-authors of the study are: Adam Tomašových of the Slovak Academy of Sciences; Martin Zuschin, Bettina Bachmann, Michaela Berensmeier and Jan Steger of the University of Vienna; Paolo Albano of the Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn; Quan Hua of the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation; Darrell Kaufman of Northern Arizona University; Susan Kidwell of the University of Chicago; Matias Ritter of the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; Marcello Simões of the Universidade Estadual Paulista; Luis Torres Jr. of the Florida Museum of Natural History; Lukas Schweigl of the University of Bologna; Troy Dexter of the University of The Bahamas; Ivo Gallmetzer of the Natural History Museum Vienna; Claudio Pellegrini of the National Research Council of Italy; and Matthew Kosnik of Macquarie University.

Thursday, August 20, 2026

 

A fossil of a small dinosaur from Fukushima prefecture reveals greater diversity in Japan's ancient coastal ecosystem





University of Tsukuba
Reconstruction of the iguanodontian (styracosternan) from Iwaki City, Fukushima Prefecture 

image: 

Reconstruction of the iguanodontian (styracosternan) from Iwaki City, Fukushima Prefecture. The red bone is the right sternal.

view more 

Credit: Masato Hattori





Tsukuba, Japan—Iguanodontians are a diverse group of herbivorous dinosaurs that lived from the Late Jurassic to the Late Cretaceous and had a worldwide distribution. Intercontinental dispersal events between Asia, North America, and Europe played a key role in their diversification across Laurasia. Fossils discovered in Japan provide valuable insights into the evolution and biogeography of iguanodontians. Recent fossil discoveries in Japan have added to the evidence suggesting that these dinosaurs inhabited coastal environments along the eastern margin of Asia. However, while a nearly complete skeleton of a large iguanodontian (approximately 8 meters in length) has been reported, most iguanodontian fossils recovered from Japan are fragmentary, consisting of isolated teeth and other remains, leaving many aspects of their diversity and ecology poorly understood.

In 1999, an isolated bone fossil was discovered on the premises of the Iwaki City Ammonite Center in Fukushima Prefecture. The center is situated within the Obisagawa Member of the Ashizawa Formation (formed approximately 90-88 million years ago), specifically the lower part of the Upper Cretaceous Futaba Group, which represents a shallow-marine depositional environment. The specimen, tentatively identified as the sternal plate of a hadrosauroid dinosaur, remained unstudied for more than two decades.

This study provides a detailed morphological description of the specimen, identifying it as the right sternal plate of an indeterminate styracosternan (a derived iguanodontians that includes hadrosauroids). Comparison with related species estimates the animal's body length to be approximately 3 meters, which is significantly smaller than that of other iguanodontian fossils previously unearthed from the same formation. Because larger iguanodontians, including hadrosauroids, are known to have existed in Japan during the Late Cretaceous, the discovery suggests that iguanodontians of varying body sizes inhabited the coastal environments of East Asia. This finding provides new insights that further corroborate the diversity of ancient coastal ecosystems.

###
This study was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery Grant (RGPIN-04697).

 

Original Paper

Title of original paper:
An iguanodontian sternal plate from the Upper Cretaceous Ashizawa Formation (Futaba Group) of Fukushima Prefecture, Japan

Journal:
Paleontological Research

DOI:
10.2517/prpsj.250042

Correspondence

Associate Professor TANAKA, Kohei
Institute of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba

KONDO, Masami
Graduate School of Science and Technology, University of Tsukuba

Curator YOSHIDA, Junki
Fukushima Museum, Japan

Related Link

Institute of Life and Environmental Sciences

Monday, August 17, 2026

 

Most mammal species discovered in the South since 1990 are found in the North



A Brazilian study analyzed the fate of 1,116 species described over the past 35 years and proposes measures to prevent so-called “parachute science”.



Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo

Most mammal species discovered in the South since 1990 are found in the North 

image: 

Baturité porcupine (Coendou baturitensis), collected in the Serra de Baturité in the municipality of Aratuba, Ceará state, by Hugo Fernandes-Ferreira and described in 2013 by Anderson Feijó and Alfredo Langguth (UFPB)

view more 

Credit: Fernando Herberson Menezes





According to a study conducted by Brazilian scientists and published in the journal NPJ Biodiversity, most of the new mammal species described over the past 35 years are housed in institutions in countries of the so-called Global North, even though the vast majority of them were discovered in poor or developing countries in the Southern Hemisphere.

The study analyzed 1,116 new mammal species described between 1990 and 2025. It concluded that 95% of the species were native to the Global South, a group of emerging countries in Latin America, Africa, Asia, and the Caribbean with similar socioeconomic characteristics. This group includes Brazil. However, 60% of the species’ holotypes (the name given to the specimens that serve as references for the scientific description of the species) are housed primarily in wealthy countries in Europe and North America. Conversely, only 22% of species native to the North described during the same period have their holotypes stored outside their country of origin, and even then, they are stored in institutions within the same geopolitical domain, which may include countries such as Australia and New Zealand.

According to the authors, these results demonstrate the impact of geopolitical and socioeconomic inequalities on scientific activity and biodiversity knowledge.

More than 90% of all mammal holotypes stored in the Global North are specimens collected in a different country. In the Global South, by contrast, less than 8% of mammal holotypes are deposited in countries other than where they were collected.

These figures are significantly higher than those for less “charismatic” groups, such as freshwater fish, where 30% of species described after 2000 have holotypes outside their country of origin, and reptiles, where 50% of species described after 1990 are housed outside the country where the animals were discovered.

“The mammal figures surprised us. Even though early colonists collected biological material from their former colonies, we didn’t expect to see such high numbers in recent decades. The problem of scientific neocolonialism is more pronounced in mammals than in other animal groups,” says Mario Moura, a professor at the Federal University of Paraíba (UFPB) and the first author of the study.

Moura is an alumnus of FAPESP’s Young Investigator Program and received a fellowship at the Institute of Biology at the State University of Campinas (IB-UNICAMP).

Brazil is one of the best countries in the group. The country led in the number of mammal discoveries during the period analyzed, with 133 new species described. Of all these holotypes, 108 (more than 80%) remained in national institutions. Nevertheless, according to the authors, the results provide new evidence of the persistence of the practice known as “parachute science,” whereby foreign scientists, primarily from the Global North, collect biological materials or fossils in countries of the Global South and take them back to be deposited and researched in their home countries, often without involving local researchers in the work based on that material.

In a previous study, Moura and his team found that “parachute science” was responsible for most descriptions of terrestrial mollusks (read more at agencia.fapesp.br/56702). Another study supervised by Moura showed that, despite having far fewer native species described between 1990 and 2025, Northern countries published more robust studies on this biodiversity. This is partly because they have more advanced analytical techniques and equipment (read more at agencia.fapesp.br/57687). 

This study is being published at a time when Brazil is seeking to repatriate other scientific materials, including dinosaur fossils taken to foreign institutions.

After successfully repatriating one set of fossils, negotiations are underway to return at least one more.

Inequality

Anyone describing a potential new species, whether plant or animal, must have access to the holotype of the most closely related species in order to compare the two and confirm that the specimen is indeed a new discovery. For this reason, holotypes are essential to documenting biodiversity.

“Accessing material from one’s own country that’s held at a foreign institution requires resources that aren’t always available, which delays the generation of knowledge,” says Jhonny Guedes, co-author of the study. Guedes conducted the study during his postdoctoral fellowship at IB-UNICAMP with funding from FAPESP. He is currently completing an internship at the Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales in Spain, also with a FAPESP fellowship

Additionally, some new species are described as a result of taxonomic revisions. During these revisions, specimens held by institutions in different countries are compared. Sometimes, state-of-the-art genomic analysis techniques are used that were unavailable when the specimens were originally collected.

This type of study often results in the description of new species and, occasionally, entire genera (read more at agencia.fapesp.br/56495 and agencia.fapesp.br/55323). 

“Since these specimens are scattered across different natural history museums and biological collections at foreign universities, European and North American researchers have much more material at their disposal to conduct their studies, even when it comes to species from South America, Africa, or Asia,” adds Matheus Moroti, another co-author and postdoctoral fellow at IB-UNICAMP who is currently completing an internship in Spain.

Causes and solutions

Madagascar ranks second only to Brazil in the number of species discovered during the period analyzed. However, the country faces a very different situation. A total of 90 new species were discovered on the African island during this period, but only 14 of them remain in the country.

Meanwhile, researchers from the United States described 324 new species during the same period, but only five were native to their territory. The rest were imported. Of the 53 countries analyzed in the study, 20 (17 of which are in the Global South) have only holotypes of native mammals within their territory. Another 17 countries, mostly in Europe, have only foreign mammals in their collections.

The researchers cross-referenced the data with various socioeconomic indicators. A country’s chances of retaining the holotypes of its native species increase with the amount of skilled labor, even if investment in science and technology is not particularly high relative to GDP. The presence of scientific institutions and stricter environmental legislation also positively contribute to retention, as is the case in Brazil.

To mitigate the problem in the short and medium term, the researchers propose several measures divided into three categories: governance, infrastructure, and access. Each category has different levels of priority and cost. However, the repatriation of all this material remains the most important measure, though it is unrealistic in the short term, according to the authors.

One high-priority, low-cost governance measure would be for scientific journals to adopt mandatory specimen deposit plans similar to current editorial policies for making data and codes available.

In the proposed version of these plans, authors of articles describing new species would be required to specify where the holotypes from their studies are deposited. They would give priority to institutions near the species’ location, ensuring accessibility to local scientists.

Another measure proposed by the authors is the creation of mobility funds. Through these funds, institutions in the Global North would issue calls for proposals to fund trips by Global South researchers to access their collections.

Another structural measure would be for institutions in the Global North to invest a percentage of their major research project budgets in partner institutions in the Global South located near sites where specimens are collected. These funds would strengthen infrastructure for storing and studying biodiversity and would also fund fellowships and support staff.

“Meaningful intellectual partnerships – ones that are mutually beneficial and respect the historical and socioeconomic differences between countries – are a one-way path for scientists in both the Global North and the Global South. The benefits extend beyond a more just and inclusive science, strengthening the Global South’s autonomy and accelerating our documentation of biodiversity,” Moura concludes.

About São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP)
The São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) is a public institution with the mission of supporting scientific research in all fields of knowledge by awarding scholarships, fellowships and grants to investigators linked with higher education and research institutions in the State of São Paulo, Brazil. FAPESP is aware that the very best research can only be done by working with the best researchers internationally. Therefore, it has established partnerships with funding agencies, higher education, private companies, and research organizations in other countries known for the quality of their research and has been encouraging scientists funded by its grants to further develop their international collaboration. You can learn more about FAPESP at www.fapesp.br/en and visit FAPESP news agency at www.agencia.fapesp.br/en to keep updated with the latest scientific breakthroughs FAPESP helps achieve through its many programs, awards and research centers. You may also subscribe to FAPESP news agency at http://agencia.fapesp.br/subscribe

Sunday, August 16, 2026

A Transgender Gospel Against Western Civilization


 August 14, 2026

They say that the arch of history bends towards progress but as a trans person in the midst of the second decade of the twenty-first century, I find myself torn at the crossroads of an increasingly bewildering age. On the one hand, transgender and gender diverse people in the West have never experienced a greater level of exposure and popular acceptance. On the other hand, these same trans people, my people, have also never faced a greater threat of state-sanctioned violence and outright erasure.

The Human Rights Campaign has found in recent polls that 41% of American adults report to personally know at least one person who openly identifies as transgender and another 85% of Americans claim that they accept that trans people should be afforded the same rights and protections as anyone else. This includes a full 76% of Republicans and the pop-cultural zeitgeist seems to concur.

Flipping through any random barrage of TV channels and/or streaming services, you will certainly find more than your fair share of programming presenting transgender people in a positive if exceedingly narrow light.

With all that being said, it can be a little hard to feel the love of statistical bromides and cultural tokenism beneath the flame of a state-fueled blowtorch.

The Republican Party has been on the warpath for some time now, openly seeking to annihilate all things trans for at least a decade, and the Trump Administration seems to represent the zenith of this campaign. A litany of executive orders signed by Trump since 2025 have directed the Federal Government to define gender as an immutable binary determined exclusively by a single document inked at birth while also commanding the most powerful government on earth to use every piece of regulatory and penal machinery at its disposal to erase anything and anyone who defies this edict.

Compulsory schools have been ordered to deprive trans children of even the most basic human dignity. Prisons and juvenile detention centers have been ordered to forcibly detransition inmates in what can only be legally described as medical experimentation. And foster homes and other related youth services have been given the green light to use all manner of religious quackery to torment the trans youth grossly overrepresented under their so-called care.

It shouldn’t take a goddamn human rights organization to tell you that this concerted campaign of forced erasure from public life qualifies as nothing less than genocide, but the Lemkin Institute for Genocide Prevention has done just that, warning that such policies and rhetoric as mentioned above match the early stages of a genocidal process based on what has been historically documented across the globe over the last century.

How in the hell is this kind of disconnect between governance and popular sentiment even possible and how did we get to such an absurdly dichotomous place as a nation, actively seeking to eradicate a people the majority of the country shows very little outward animosity towards?

The reason for the violence is fairly simple, at least to any committed student of historical collapse. The American Empire is in the early stages of the kind of long, slow disintegration that ultimately befalls all imperial hegemons. Our nation is not only rapidly losing the faith of its own citizenry, it is losing the faith of many of its own proxies who are showing increasingly bold signs of going rogue with the barbarians at the gates.

Traditionally, under such dyer circumstance, collapsing empires frequently appeal to small but fanatical death cults within the upper echelons of their polluted societies. For Pax-Americana under the reign of Imperator Trump this means riling up the Christo-Zionist Millenarians of the Evangelical Movement.

In order to keep this powerful minority engaged and committed to a series of increasingly pointless and unwinnable wars, the Empire needs to feed them a juicy scapegoat now and then and thus they rally the doom seekers around the spook of the evil, mincing, transgender groomer lurking in a women’s room near you.

On multiple occasions, I have seen Donald Trump cornered in the Oval Office with offensively polite questions about his abject failure to reign in a thrice decapitated third world nation in the Persian Gulf only to witness that soiled Ceasar bark incoherently about ‘men in women’s sports’ and some conspiracy to ‘trans all the children.’ This rhetoric isn’t for the general public; it’s for a very specific moneyed faithful amongst the petite bourgeoisie. The kind of people willing to drop nukes on Gaza just to see Jesus ride back to earth on a dinosaur.

But what of the silent tolerant majority? What happened to all that glorious acceptance we soaked up under Imperator Biden?

Sadly, regardless of popular sentiment, it was all little more than worthless rhetorical platitudes; the desperate byproduct of a rival attempt to save the bad name of the same empire now busy erasing us.

Every empire consists of a constant contest between competing elites. These elites tend to share virtually identical goals. They tend to struggle to protect the same institutions that empower all of them. They just don’t always agree on the best strategy to do this. Some of them will even go so far as to vigorously compete for the highest position on their mountain of skulls and that is what we are witnessing here with this facetious war over trans rights.

In spite of their hollow rhetoric, the Democrats do not support Queer people. They fund the exact same prisons and compulsory school system that serve to enslave and marginalize us as their Republican rivals do. The Democrats simply seek to use the spook of ‘LGBTQ tolerance’ to prove that the Empire which thrashes us is capable of humanitarian inclusion. After all, how can the Devil be a monster while he’s petting a kitten?

This kind of imperial inclusion has done nothing to serve my people. Quite the contrary, it has only made us appear complicit in the corruption of our tormentors. Transgender people have become associated with a morally bankrupt society by conservatives in the same fashion that many Christians have by those on the left.

We have all become human shields in a culture war between different factions of elite imperial casualties and that is a revolting shame. Your average redneck Jesus freak cares far more about Palestine, Ohio than Jerusalem and your average tranny lunatic cares far more about the gulags of their own local wing of the Prison Industrial Complex than Putin’s Russia. But we are all compelled to warfare, both with each other and the world, in the name of strikingly similar concepts of Western cultural universalism.

I myself inhabit a decidedly vexing space in this manufactured cataclysm as I happen to be something of a Christian as well as something of a transwoman. In fact, both of these disciplines are inspired by the same commitment I owe to Gnostic Sophiology and both of those seemingly divergent phenomena predate what we now know as Western Civilization.

Christianity was just one of many schools of ancient Gnostic mysticism to spring from the battlefields of the Levant onto the streets of Rome before that Empire, the very same empire that crucified Christianity’s namesake, decided to use that particular school popular among the urban Roman working class to justify their struggling empire’s continued existence and endless expansion.

In the process of assimilation, entire Gospels were purged from the Bible while others were censored and manipulated beyond recognition and from this manipulation modern Western Civilization was born.

In spite of the fact that Christ made zero reference to the third genders which existed both in Europe and the Levant during his lifetime, the newly Roman Catholic Church and its colonial Protestant progeny in England blasphemously used the name of Christ to erase all trace of any form of gender expression that existed outside the binary.

As Christian law gelled into a single dictum across Medieval Europe, rigid gender norms were enforced that essentially rendered women into breeding stock and viewed all forms of fluidity between male and female as a threat to an order designed to reduce the womb into a glorified soldier factory to populate the battlefields of an endless crusade for more church property.

The Enlightenment only served to reinforce this rigid gender binary by declaring that construct be a science and rendering it to a distinction that could only be determined by the state. Thus, the tyranny of the birth certificate became sanctified by liberal secularism.

The Enlightenment also fostered the rise of chattel slavery and indigenous genocide with its similar breakthroughs in scientific racism, opening the door for missionaries to erase even more ancient third genders from the face of multiple continents. Be they two spirit or hijra, they were all sentenced to the same fate as the so-called eunuchs of the Gospels; marginalization to the point of erasure.

But both wings of the West failed and we are still here, fighting yet another wave of imperial subjugation on our own, while the elites compete over their kingdom of skulls in another pointless midterm election circus.

And here I stand with you today, during what has been declared Transgender History Month by some corporate monolith or another, as a devout Marian witch, a post-civ genderqueer anarchist, and perhaps above all else, living, spitting, hissing proof of the failures of Western Civilization in all its secular cabals and devout renditions.

They all failed. They failed to contain the Holy Spirit beneath the jar of a single tyrannical church, and they failed to contain the human spirit beneath the jar of a manufactured gender binary, just as they have failed to contain the Axis of Resistance beneath their bombs.

My message to you, my dearest motherfuckers, and to any agent of imperial bureaucracy surveilling this screed, is that the Christo-Zionist horde is right about one thing and that is that gender outlaws like me are the bane of Western Civilization.

To this slur I proudly shout, ‘your goddamn right we are and we’re here to finish the job that the third world started!’ You can pass all the laws and royal edicts you want. The writing is already scrawled in Venus Extravaganza’s blood all over the temple walls; your stadium church is a massive tomb of material emptiness and your empire’s days of rape and honey are numbered.

Death to the old gods! Long live the ancient gods! And long live those of us compelled to transgress in their honor, for we shall inherit the ruins of a blasphemous era and bring forth a new age of tribal diversity in stiletto heels and smeared lipstick.

Nicky Reid is an agoraphobic anarcho-genderqueer gonzo blogger from Central Pennsylvania and assistant editor for Attack the System. You can find her online at Exile in Happy Valley.