Showing posts sorted by date for query LGBTQ. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query LGBTQ. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Wednesday, September 09, 2026

Diplomatic row escalates as UK, France and Canada move to sanction Israeli settlements

Issued on: 09/09/2026 - FRANCE24

Britain, France and Canada said Tuesday they will ban imports from Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank, with a UK minister accusing Israel of turning a blind eye to the "ethnic cleansing" of Palestinians there. The moves prompted a furious Israel to unveil immediate counter-measures targeting Britain, as Jerusalem-based journalist Jordana Miller reports.



‘Must Be Just the Beginning’: UK, France, Canada Move to Ban Imports From Israeli Settlements

“Today, we refuse to be bystanders to further suffering and to the destruction of the two-state solution,” said UK Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband.


Palestinians inspect severe damage inside a family home following an Israeli military raid and siege in the West Bank on September 8, 2026.
(Photo by Issam Rimawi/Anadolu via Getty Images)

Jake Johnson
Sep 08, 2026
COMMON DREAMS


The United Kingdom, France, and Canada joined forces on Tuesday to ban imports of goods and some services from illegal Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank, where settlers and soldiers are assailing, displacing, and killing Palestinians at an unprecedented rate with the backing of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government.

“Today, we refuse to be bystanders to further suffering and to the destruction of the two-state solution,” Ed Miliband, the UK’s foreign secretary, said in a speech to the House of Commons. Miliband pointed to the Israeli government’s recent approval of construction projects that would evict Palestinian communities and “place settlements directly between East Jerusalem and the West Bank, cutting through the heart of Palestine.”

“Let’s be clear what this means: the creation of a set of facts on the ground to make the two-state solution unviable,” said Miliband, in what was described as the UK government’s most forceful condemnation of Israeli conduct in the West Bank to date. “The British government agrees that there is ethnic cleansing of Palestinians in areas of the West Bank—perpetrated by settler terrorists. And all too often the Israeli government has turned a blind eye to this and worse, members of it have made statements and taken actions to support the forced displacement of Palestinians.”

Miliband said the UK government would “take action against specific companies and individuals who provide services such as construction, infrastructure, financing, or real estate for settlement expansion” and penalize “those who finance or facilitate illegal settlements.” He said the sanctions would be in place within six to nine months.



Miliband emphasized that in banning imports from Israel’s West Bank settlements, the UK was not acting alone. The British foreign secretary noted that France and Canada will also “ban the import of goods from illegal settlements,” joining “the Netherlands, Ireland, Belgium, Spain and Norway—which have either banned goods or are in the process of doing so.”

Jean-Noël Barrot, France’s foreign affairs minister, wrote on social media that France is cutting off imports from illegal Israeli settlements “because the West Bank is on the brink of explosion: unchecked expansion of colonization in violation of international law, surge in violence perpetrated by extremist settlers against Palestinians, acts of terror denounced by the Israeli authorities themselves.”

“France cannot, through its trade, support a situation that threatens the security of Israelis and Palestinians alike, as well as peace and stability in the region,” Barrot wrote. “Europe must uphold the same imperative.”

In a joint statement on Tuesday, the foreign ministers of 12 nations—the UK, France, Canada, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Ireland, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Spain, and Sweden—said that the situation in the West Bank is “rapidly deteriorating amid unprecedented levels of settler violence and settlement expansion, including the unacceptable decision to publish tenders for the E1 settlement project.”

The foreign ministers confirmed their “intention to introduce national and/or support European restrictions on trade in goods with settlements which are illegal under international law, or that they are actively considering these and other measures, in accordance with their national procedures.”

“In this regard, the UK, France, and Canada welcome the important action already taken by Ireland, Spain, the Netherlands, Norway, and Belgium, and will bring forward national measures to ban trade in settlement goods,” the statement continued. “The government of Israel must immediately halt the expansion of settlements and civilian administrative powers, ensure accountability for settler violence, and investigate allegations against Israeli forces.”

Advocates largely welcomed the governments’ announcements while stressing that they should be the starting point for more sweeping action to confront the Israeli government’s illegal annexation efforts in the West Bank and crimes against humanity across the Palestinian territories, including the decimated Gaza Strip.

“Today’s announcement is the result of many years of work by campaigners and Palestinians themselves fighting to end severe injustice,” said Nick Dearden, director of the UK-based advocacy group Global Justice Now. “We know this move will be very popular in Britain. But it must be just the beginning. How can we cooperate with a military guilty of the most serious abuses of international law? How can we trade with a country that stands accused of genocide at the world’s highest court?”

Omar Barghouti, co-founder of the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement, dismissed the UK government’s sanctions announcement as “largely performative,” but said they also “reflect the impact of relentless public pressure on the current government.”

“The UK is legally obliged to take serious measures to end its complicity with the State of Israel, not merely with the settlements, per the [International Court of Justice],” said Barghouti. “While Miliband says, ‘We will not acquiesce in the destruction of the two-state solution,’ he has not said how the UK will stop its active contribution to the Israeli-US led destruction of the international legal system and the drive towards a might-makes-right order.”

US and Israeli officials responded furiously to the UK’s sanctions announcement. Itamar Ben-Gvir, Israel’s extremist national security minister, called for the closure of the British consulate in East Jerusalem, while Israel’s finance minister demanded the expulsion of the British ambassador.

Mike Huckabee, the US ambassador to Israel, characterized the UK’s trade ban as “discrimination against the Jewish people” and suggested that individual American states such as Florida could retaliate against the British government.

US Rep. Randy Fine (R-Fla.), a rabidly pro-Israel lawmaker and anti-Muslim bigot, wrote on social media that “Florida is one of Britain’s largest trading partners” and signaled that the state could move to boycott UK goods.

Far-Right Israeli Finance Minister Demands Expulsion of UK Ambassador Over Settlement Trade Ban

The United Kingdom’s Labour government is set to announce a ban on trade with illegal Israeli settlements in the West Bank.



Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich takes part in the Jerusalem Day parade at the Damascus Gate in the old city of Jerusalem on May 14, 2026.
(Photo by Erik Marmor/Getty Images)

Jake Johnson
Sep 08, 2026
COMMON DREAMS

The United Kingdom on Tuesday is expected to announce a ban on trade with illegal Israeli settlements in the West Bank, a plan that prompted a furious response from far-right Israeli and American officials even as British diplomats privately acknowledged that the new sanctions package would be mostly symbolic.

“Expel the British ambassador tonight!” Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich wrote in a social media post ahead of the official announcement. “We will not be a doormat trampled by an antisemitic government, in a country conquered by radical Islam, trying to save itself from economic and social decline by attacking Jews and the State of Israel.”

UK Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband, who is Jewish, is set to unveil the trade ban as the Israeli government aggressively accelerates its unlawful land grabs and expulsion of Palestinians in the West Bank, where violent rampages by Israeli settlers have reached unprecedented levels. The trade ban was developed after the Israeli government advanced a plan to build more than 1,200 new settlement homes in the West Bank.

The Guardian reported Monday that “in his statement to MPs, Miliband is expected to use firmer language than his recent predecessors in calling out the humanitarian injustices suffered by Palestinians in Gaza.”

“The steps he lays out are likely to fall short of the full set of demands made by Palestinian advocacy groups,” the outlet added, “but they will still be seen as a sign that the UK is moving beyond traditional rhetorical support for a two-state solution towards active steps to forestall the expansion of illegal settlements in the West Bank—widely seen as intended to destroy the prospect of a Palestinian state.”

New UK Prime Minister Andy Burnham reportedly spoke with US President Donald Trump on Monday about the impending trade ban, which drew condemnation from the US ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee.

Behind the scenes, according to Bloomberg, UK diplomats “privately told the US that the sanctions are largely symbolic and will have no material impact on the UK’s wider relationship with Israel on trade or security, in a bid to soothe the Trump administration’s response.”

Francesca Albanese, the United Nations special rapporteur on the occupied Palestinian territories, told The Guardian that a ban on trade with Israeli settlements would be an “absolutely important” change in UK government policy.

Nick Dearden, director of the UK-based advocacy group Global Justice Now, wrote on social media that “a settlement ban is welcome but we must go further.”

“Hope the government will include services and will announce new bans of weapons sales and military coordination tomorrow,” Dearden added. “The comms is an improvement but we need action.”

Reuters reported that the impact of the policy move on bilateral trade with Israel is “likely to be ⁠minimal, with details unclear of how the UK will differentiate between goods originating in West Bank settlements [and] products made in Israel.”

‘I’ll Wear It as a Badge of Honor,’ Says MP Sultana After Israel Bars Entry to 11 UK Lawmakers

“I will not be intimidated into silence,” said MP Zarah Sultana. “If anything, this ban only strengthens my resolve to keep speaking out.”


Your Party MP Zarah Sultana speaks during a national march for Palestine on January 31, 2026, in London, England. Pro-Palestinian demonstrators marched through central London to protest Israel’s military actions in Gaza and to call on the UK government to end its political and military support for Israel.
(Photo by Alishia Abodunde/Getty Images)


Stephen Prager
Sep 08, 2026
COMMON DREAMS

Zarah Sultana, a member of the UK Parliament, said she won’t stop speaking about the rights of Palestinians after Israel banned her from entering the country on Tuesday.

“Given that this is a fascist government presiding over genocide, apartheid and an illegal occupation, I’ll wear it as a badge of honor,” she said in a post to X. “I will not be intimidated into silence. I will continue to speak out against Israel’s genocide and against the UK’s complicity. If anything, this ban only strengthens my resolve to keep speaking out.”

Sultana, who represents Coventry South and is a co-founder of the left-wing Your Party, was one of 11 members of Parliament whom Israel announced it was blocking from entry in retaliation after the UK joined Canada, France, and other nations to announce an import ban on goods from Israeli settlements in the West Bank, which are considered illegal under international law.


Following a year of record violence against Palestinians in the territory, UK Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband said the import ban was in response to the “ethnic cleansing of Palestinians in areas of the West Bank—perpetrated by settler terrorists.”

Israel has reacted with fury at the move, closing the British consulate in East Jerusalem, which handles relations with Palestinians in East Jerusalem, the West Bank, and Gaza.

Also banned from the country are UK Labour MPs Diane Abbott, Richard Burgon, John McDonnell, and Naz Shah; Green MPs Siân Berry, Ellie Chowns, Carla Denyer, Adrian Ramsay, and Hannah Spencer; as well as Jeremy Corbyn, who led the Labour Party from 2015-20 before co-founding Your Party with Sultana in 2025.

Remarking on his and his colleagues’ ban from the country, Corbyn said Israel’s treatment of Palestinians was “the real scandal.”



“I have visited all parts of Palestine on several occasions, where I have witnessed the horrors of occupation, as well as the resilience and humanity of the Palestinian people,” Corbyn wrote on X. “They are the ones who suffer from Israel’s apartheid. It is their freedom which is egregiously curtailed, alongside thousands of Palestinian refugees who are denied the right of return.”

He added: “As the world wakes up to the genocide in Gaza, it is shocking that Israel continues to deny entry to UN investigators and international journalists. Israel doesn’t want the world to see what it is doing—but we can never give up in our attempts to expose the truth.”

Israel also banned Fahad Ansari, a lawyer who has represented Hamas’ political wing in court in the UK and—like Sultana—said on X, “I am neither British nor an MP but do take this as a badge of honor (although pretty sure I’m already a persona non grata in the apartheid state).”


Corbyn Urges UK Government to Condemn Gaza Genocide After Israeli Settlement Trade Ban

“This is not merely a matter of semantics. This is a matter of international law.”


UK Member of Parliament Jeremy Corbyn holds a copy of the Gaza Tribunal Report at Conway Hall in London on March 16, 2026.
(Photo by Jeremy Corbyn/X)

Jessica Corbett
Sep 08, 2026
CONMMON DREAMS


Amid Israeli settlers and soldiers’ unprecedented violence against Palestinians in the occupied West Bank, Member of Parliament Jeremy Corbyn was among those arguing on Tuesday that the United Kingdom’s new “sanctions on illegal settlements are welcome, but not enough,” and calling on Prime Minister Andy Burnham to condemn Israel’s war on the Gaza Strip as genocide.

On behalf of the UK’s ruling Labour Party, Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband announced a ban on trade with illegal Israeli settlements in the West Bank. He was joined by leaders from Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Iceland, Ireland, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Spain, and Sweden, who confirmed “their intention to introduce national and/or support European restrictions” on trading with Israeli West Bank settlements.

Corbyn, a former Labour leader from Islington North who has since co-founded Your Party, declared that “Britain must end all arms sales, all military cooperation, and all forms of support that sustain Israel’s system of apartheid, occupation, and genocide.”



In addition to speaking in Parliament on Tuesday, Corbyn wrote to Burnham that “for three years, we have witnessed the abominable destruction of human life in Gaza,” where “Israel has killed at least 73,000 people, excluding an untold number of people lost under the rubble.”

While welcoming Burnham’s recent admission that Labour “got it wrong” and its “initial response to the treatment of Gaza caused huge hurt,” Corbyn said that “it is extremely disappointing that these words have not translated into meaningful action.”

“It has not gone unnoticed that, 50 days into your premiership, you have declined to call ‘the treatment of Gaza’ what it really is: a genocide,” the MP stressed, noting that the term has long been used by scholars and human rights advocates globally. “This is not merely a matter of semantics. This is a matter of international law.”

“Far from preventing genocide, the British government has facilitated genocide through ongoing military, economic, and political cooperation,” Corbyn charged, pointing to his call for an independent public inquiry into the UK’s complicity. “The question is not whether Labour got it wrong. The question is what your government will do now.”

Corbyn asked Burnham to confirm if he will establish an inquiry, end all military cooperation with Israel, impose widespread sanctions, overturn the ban on the advocacy group Palestine Action, and support the work of the International Criminal Court and the International Court of Justice—the ICC issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his former defense minister, and the ICJ has taken up South Africa’s genocide case on the Israel Defense Forces’ (IDF) conduct in Gaza.



As Corbyn pushed UK leaders to go further than the new trade ban—which is largely symbolic—the Israeli government responded to the sanctions by taking aim at a dozen people, including Corbyn and his Your Party co-founder, MP Zarah Sultana, barring them from entering Israel.

Israel also banned four Labour MPs—Diane Abbot, Richard Burgon, John McDonnell, and Naz Shah, as well as five members of the Green Party: Siân Berry, Ellie Chowns, Carla Denyer, Adrian Ramsay, and Hannah Spencer. The final person barred from Israel is Fahad Ansari, a lawyer who has represented Hamas’ political wing in court in the UK, according to The Times of Israel.

Ansari replied on social media Tuesday that “I am neither British nor an MP but do take this as a badge of honor (although pretty sure I’m already a persona non grata in the apartheid state).”

Meanwhile, others in the United Kingdom and around the world joined Corbyn in framing the Labour government’s sanctions as progress, while also emphasizing that, as the Corbyn-founded Peace & Justice Project put it, “they should only mark the start of the process in bringing about real peace and social justice for the Palestinian people, who have been subjected to decades of unimaginable subjugation, ethnic cleansing, and genocide.”

“The UK government must commit to a full arms embargo on Israel, ending all forms of military cooperation with the IDF, and supporting the ICC arrest warrants against Benjamin Netanyahu and members of his Cabinet,” the project declared, calling for the full implementation of recommendations from the Gaza Tribunal report from last year.



Describing the UK’s “concrete action” and recognition of “Israel’s unlawful occupation and ethnic cleansing” as “hugely welcome,” Kerry Moscogiuri, Amnesty International UK’s chief executive, noted that Miliband “promised a ‘comprehensive reset’ and today could be the sea change that is needed.”

“Amid ethnic cleansing, genocide, and apartheid against Palestinians, today’s measures are a genuine step towards accountability for Israel’s repeated and flagrant violations of international law,” she said. “The commitment to ban trade in settlement goods and some services, prohibit financing of settlements, refuse arms that contribute to the occupation, and support the genocide case before the International Court of Justice represents a significant change of course.”

“For years, Amnesty has worked with members, partners and parliamentarians from across the political spectrum to press for meaningful change, and today shows that campaigning for human rights works,” she added. “But today is not the end of the road. The test now is whether these commitments are properly implemented and enforced, and followed by the wider action needed to hold Israel accountable for its crimes and meet the UK’s obligations under international law.”

MAGA lawmaker's threat to punish Britain could wipe out 70,000 jobs in his own state

Alexander Willis
September 8, 2026 
RAW STORY


U.S. Representative Randy Fine (R-FL) leaves after the House of Representatives passed a war powers resolution on the ongoing conflict with Iran on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., U.S., July 23, 2026. REUTERS/Eric Lee

Rep. Randy Fine (R-FL) issued a fierce threat to the British government as it considered imposing boycotts on goods from illegal Israeli settlements, a threat that could end up wiping out around 70,000 American jobs.

On Monday, reports revealed that the United Kingdom was preparing to impose new restrictions on goods produced in Israeli settlements. There are more than 700,000 Israeli settlers illegally living in the West Bank, with instances of Israeli settler violence rising in recent months. Also on Monday, Fine issued the United Kingdom a warning.

“As the British government considers forcing British companies to boycott portions of Israel, it should be aware that a Florida law that I passed as a member of the Legislature would ban any British company forced to comply from doing business with any state or local government in Florida,” Fine wrote in a statement published on social media.

“It would also end any British business participating in that boycott from doing any business in Florida if it needed any official interaction with state or local government to operate (permits, tax collection). Florida is one of Britain’s largest trading partners. They should understand that their vanity project in support of Muslim terror could cost them billions of dollars.”

The United Kingdom is a top investor in Florida, and British companies account for around 70,000 jobs in the Sunshine State. In a follow-up post, Fine asked X's chatbot Grok to explain how Florida's anti-boycott law might affect British companies — and critics said its response backfired on him spectacularly.

“LOL. You are going to wreck your own state,” wrote Leilani Dowding, a British model and reality television personality, in a social media post on X Tuesday.

“Haha, you asked Grok, and it told you how much your plan would f--- over Florida, not the UK,” wrote Jack Duncan, a British LGBTQ+ rights activist, in a social media post on X Tuesday.

About a dozen” American citizens have died from incidents involving Israeli settlers or soldiers, including the death of American activist Rachel Corrie, who was crushed to death by an IDF bulldozer in Gaza in 2003. An American was killed by Israeli settlers as recently as July of last year: 20-year-old Sayfollah Musallet, who was “beaten to death” by settlers while on his family’s farm near Ramallah in the West Bank.



Friday, September 04, 2026

Op-Ed

Releases, Not Transfers, Must Be at the Center of Prison Closure Plans

As former residents of a California prison, we celebrated its closure but abhorred the punitive transfer process.

Truthout/TheAppeal
August 31, 2026

California Rehabilitation Center located in Norco, California.
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

For decades, the California Rehabilitation Center (CRC) in Norco has been known for its deplorable conditions: extreme heat, pest infestations, unreliable programming, and water so unsafe that guards refuse to drink it. As residents of CRC, we experienced these conditions firsthand. So we celebrated when the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) announced in August 2025 that CRC had been named for closure. Almost one year later, as of July 29, 2026, CRC has officially been emptied. Today, the empty prison remains in “warm shutdown” mode, costing the state hundreds of millions of dollars.

The announcement of CRC Norco’s closure was a testament to years of community advocacy to reduce the imprisoned population, expose systemic issues in CRC that are reflective of those throughout the prison system, and highlight possibilities for non-carceral reinvestment in California’s Riverside County. Imprisoned people, loved ones, and advocates had exposed the toxicity in CRC for decades — leading to the prison being marked for closure in 2012 by the CDCR under then-Gov. Jerry Brown. In 2021, Californians United for a Responsible Budget (CURB) named CRC Norco as the top state prison to close based on a survey of more than 2,000 imprisoned people. We connected with CURB in 2024 to share testimony about CRC’s horrific conditions and failing infrastructure.

There is much to learn from looking back at CRC’s closure process. During its closure, imprisoned people in CRC Norco have been subjected to a gauntlet of unnecessary burdens and persecution, similar to those endured in prior closures. California needs to close more prisons — they cause more harm than they address while draining billions of dollars in resources from the communities that need them most. But we also can’t let the CDCR use closures as an excuse to punish imprisoned people with tumultuous transfers, denial of food and medicine, restricted access to rehabilitative programming, and retaliation. Releases, not chaotic transfers, must be the center of any future closure plan.

As CRC emptied out, one of us stayed behind while the other was transferred to another prison. From both sides of the closure process, we have seen the same pattern of preventable harm.

For those who remained inside CRC during the closure process, including college students finishing classes at Norco College or UC Riverside’s prison education program, conditions rapidly worsened. After the announcement of CRC’s closure, we were moved to the “punishment dorm,” where roughly 200 people were packed together with only six small tables for studying. We endured barely functioning sinks and showers, cockroach infestations, and unbearable heat with no working swamp coolers or ventilation. These conditions served no legitimate purpose and disrupted those trying to study, participate in programs, and cope with institutional stress. 



Op-EdCA Should Send Prisoners Home Instead of Spending Millions on New Facilities
A new facility celebrated by Gov. Gavin Newsom will disrupt prisoner-led programming and normalize our captivity. By Steve Brooks , Truthout/TheAppeal  April 3, 2026


In May 2026, those who remained saw their already child-sized meal portions cut in half because CDCR allegedly failed to order enough food to sustain us during the closure process. First, the eggs disappeared from breakfast trays, leaving empty compartments. Was this a mistake, or another CDCR policy that rewards neglect? The answer became clear when portions were reduced again, leaving us hungry and undernourished.

Accustomed to operating with little scrutiny, CDCR bristled when we sought support from our loved ones about the food shortage. At first, administrators denied the problem, then threatened us, demanding we “stop calling our people and complaining.”

Later that month, correctional officers forced last-minute housing changes in the middle of the night, pushing dorms beyond mandated capacity limits and making already unsafe conditions worse. The roughly 400 people who remained in CRC at the time were packed 80 to a dorm designed for 60. These conditions were compounded by rising temperatures and recent fires that filled the air with asbestos-contaminated smoke.

For others, the transfer process carried its own set of abuses.

Calls for transfer came with no warning, and often in the middle of the night. This is standard protocol, as exhaustion is meant to disorient us. Caffeine and nerves had us trembling as we marched to the transfer cages. We waited in that cramped concrete box until 7:45 a.m. with nothing to eat but a single PB&J. After hours on a prison bus, shackled at the waist, ankles, and wrists, the same snack was provided again while we waited at the receiving institution. These are the conditions of transfer: hunger, exhaustion, and nagging uncertainty — all used to mentally subdue us.

Some of us left CRC on December 22, 2025, and were transferred to California State Prison in Lancaster (CSP-LA). A handful of us arrived without our property. After watching others receive their personal items, we were told that ours were never loaded onto the bus.

During transfers, some wait weeks for belongings, and others never receive them. A person’s property can disappear without a trace, with no consequences for staff involved. To make matters worse, CSP-LA was in no hurry to issue state clothing. With only one outfit and no winter apparel, those of us without clothes went freezing in our cells with no food, hygiene products, and nothing to do but think and wait.

It took weeks for some of us to receive our property, and even longer to get our state-issued tablets, which are used for phone calls and text messages. During those weeks without them, guards barely let us out to use the phones. When they did, the process was not set up to guarantee access, making it nearly impossible to contact our loved ones. Days went by waiting in phone lines, only to be forced back into our cells, sometimes without even the means to send a letter.

These harms are not an inevitable part of the prison closure process. Instead of addressing preventable problems, CDCR has used transfers, overcrowding, and long program waitlists to argue for preserving and expanding corrections budgets, even as incarcerated populations decline. The most insidious part: CDCR uses the allure of initiatives that, in reality, mask the harms of incarceration by building “kinder, gentler cages” to justify its power grabs, convincing lawmakers that spending billions on newer prisons and other gimmicks are somehow the antidote to the devastation that prisons cause in the first place. Reducing reliance on a toxic prison system and preventing harm are not at odds; in fact, they must go hand in hand.

The state can take concrete steps to mitigate harm, the clearest being prioritization of releases over transfers in closure plans. One way to do this is by evaluating people for resentencing eligibility when a prison gets named for closure. On average, it costs at least $128,000 annually to imprison one person, with additional resources being spent on the transfer process. If individuals are assessed for release following a closure announcement, the transfer process could be avoided altogether and eligible individuals can return home.

In cases where release does not happen, imprisoned people should be given meaningful choice in the transfer process. Their needs, including proximity to loved ones, health care, continuation of programming, and completion of programming scheduled to finish before closure, should be honored.

Rushed transfers are preventable — and a product of CDCR’s own making. By labeling closure-related transfers “emergencies,” CDCR circumvents laws designed to reduce involuntary and adverse transfers. CRC Norco was not scheduled to close until the fall of 2026; had CDCR followed that timeline, more of us could have had our family and programming needs met. Instead, many have spent over two months without timely hearings. Within this period, our family visitation was severely limited and we were barred access to programming, education, employment opportunities, yard, religious services, the library, and even purchasing basic hygiene and food items.

The suffering unfolding at CRC and in the transfer process is not a necessary part of closure. These are choices made by CDCR and CRC staff. As CDCR continues to push prison expansion, California can and should remain focused on closing more prisons without the abuse. Future plans should center releases over transfers so closure meaningfully reduces the human cost of incarceration.



This article is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), and you are free to share and republish under the terms of the license.

Mathew Witecki

Mathew Witecki is a 2026 graduate of University of California, Riverside with a bachelor’s degree in Education, Society, and Human Development and an inside advocate with Californians United for a Responsible Budget (CURB). Mathew was imprisoned at the California Rehabilitation Center (CRC), Norco and transferred to San Quentin. He is scheduled to be released in 2027 and hopes to continue his education in the Masters of Public Policy program at UCLA.



Ryan Brennan

Ryan Brennan is a queer advocate and community organizer. While in prison, he developed and facilitated the LGBTQ Allies program. He also earned a bachelor’s degree in organizational studies from Pitzer College. It was this program that inspired him to become a Prison Industrial Complex (PIC) abolitionist. Ryan is currently imprisoned at CSP-LAC, Lancaster. He plans to continue organizing against the PIC when he is released at the end of the year.

Thursday, September 03, 2026

Fox fired Bartiromo for being a Trump rat: report


Image via screengrab/Fox News.
September 03, 2026
ALTERNET

Status reports that it has uncovered the reason behind Fox News’ firing of veteran entertainer Maria Bartiromo, the business journalist who became a source of right-wing conspiracies.

The Rupert Murdoch-controlled network offered no explanation for her removal, but hours after her dismissal, Status believes it has the answer: Bartiromo, 58, had informed the White House about Fox’s secret instructions to not promote President Donald Trump’s election conspiracies on the air.

Status report that Fox News had instructed senior management to divert coverage of Trump’s primetime address to the nation, wherein he claimed that China had interfered in the 2020 presidential election to benefit Joe Biden. Trump also ravaged the U.S. election system without proof, but neglected to mention Russian interference favoring his own election.

The White House was apparently surprised that its chief propaganda network opted to avoid Trump’s lie-filled address, and mined Bartiromo for an explanation. And it soon dragged the reason out of her. According to Status, Bartiromo even shared the text message that relayed the network’s orders for the White House blackout.

After the network betrayal, Fox managers scrubbed Bartiromo’s presence from the network, with Fox Business Network already taking down her contributor page.

According to the statement, "Effective today, Maria Bartiromo is no longer with FOX News Media. In making the announcement, FOX News Media said, 'We thank Maria for her work over the last 12 and a half years and wish her all the best in her next chapter."

'Betrayed her employer': Explosive incident that got Maria Bartiromo the ax revealed

Matthew Chapman
September 3, 2026 
RAW STORY


FILE PHOTO: Maria Bartiromo poses on the red carpet for the 2025 Kennedy Center Honors at the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts in Washington, D.C., U.S., December 7, 2025. REUTERS/Jeenah Moon

When Fox News issued abrupt press release announcing the departure of its top personality, Maria Bartiromo, the network offered no explanation of what happened, or even whether she was leaving of her own volition or not.

Now, according to the "Status" newsletter, the truth has been revealed: Bartiromo was indeed fired — because of a previously unreported incident earlier this summer.

Specifically, per the report from Oliver Darcy, "After Trump delivered his unhinged prime time speech in which he pushed more conspiracy theories about the 2020 election, this time making a number of allegations against China ... Fox News issued guidance to senior employees instructing them to steer clear of giving credence to Trump’s delusional claims," in the form of a text message to staff.

Once this happened, said the report, Bartiromo spilled the beans to the White House "that Trump’s speech had received scant coverage on the channel because network bosses had ordered it so," and provided them with the text message proving it.

"In doing so, Bartiromo not only effectively betrayed her employer, but also disclosed confidential company information, violating the terms of her employment agreement," said the report.

Bartiromo has frequently landed in trouble for pushing President Donald Trump's conspiracy theories, and claims from his allies, about the 2020 election being stolen.

Her uncritical promotion of claims that Dominion Voting Systems equipment was compromised, some of it coming from a woman who claimed to have learned this through time travel, played a key role in Dominion's defamation suit against the network, which was ultimately settled for just under $800 million.



Mike Huckabee's cryptic message about Maria Bartiromo raises red flags after Fox exit

Matthew Chapman
September 3, 2026 
RAW STORY


U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem speaks with U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee as she arrives at Ben Gurion Airport, in Tel Aviv, Israel, May 25, 2025. Alex Brandon/Pool via REUTERS

President Donald Trump's Ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, spoke out on X in response to the abrupt news that Maria Bartiromo was departing Fox News — and one particular line in his post drew intense scrutiny.

"I just saw that @MariaBartiromo has left @FoxBusiness @FoxNews & so sad to hear," wrote Huckabee, a Southern Baptist pastor who previously served as governor of Arkansas. "The smartest, hardest-working journalist & absolutely a class act. It was an honor to work with him/ her and later to be guest on a show always worth watching."

The peculiar use of "him/her" had many people piling on with mockery. Many people guessed that Huckabee, or some staffer working for him, accidentally sent out a form letter post without properly customizing it; others, however, joked that Huckabee possibly had some LGBTQ-related dirt on Bartiromo, or at least ridiculed the mistake coming from an administration that is famously dogmatic about gender pronouns.

"I'm always saying 'It was an honor to work with him/ her,'" wrote Bloomberg Washington and White House correspondent Josh Wingrove.

"To work with who now?" wrote Andrew Egger of The Bulwark.

"'It was an honor to work with him/ her,'" echoed commentator Damin Toell, who wondered what "kinda Maria Bartiromo news is about to drop??"

"Her pronouns are she/they, actually," wrote Billy Binion of the libertarian site Reason.

Huckabee himself seemed to notice the jokes about his bizarre statement, and stepped in to clarify.

"Thanks for catching the 'him/her' line!" he wrote. "I was typing while riding in vehicle on bumpy street--but have NO idea how that came out! Aside from my clumsy typo mistake, I still love @MariaBartiromo & will always have total respect for HER. Just HER, no "him" involved!"


Shocked Trump slams Maria Bartiromo's firing in late-night post: 'A true warrior'

Bennito L. Kelty
September 3, 2026 
RAW STORY


U.S. President Donald Trump speaks while hosting a dinner in the Rose Garden at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., September 2, 2026. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein

President Donald Trump reacted with disbelief to the firing of Fox News anchor Maria Bartiromo in a late-night Truth Social post.

Bartiromo abruptly left Fox News with an announcement on Thursday. Reporting by the "Status" newsletter revealed that she was fired after leaking to Trump that Fox News had told staff to steer clear of lending credence to his claims of Chinese interference in the 2020 election.

"I can't believe Maria Bartiromo is no longer going to have her great show (s) on FoxNews/Business," Trump wrote. "Three different shows, always number one. Maria is a total professional, and a true warrior. Her fans, of which there are many, will not be happy."

He signed off, "God bless you, Maria!"






100+ Civil Society Groups Condemn Trump Attack on Democratic Establishment Think Tank

“We stand with the Center for American Progress, not in agreement with every view they hold, but in steadfast support for their rights to voice those views freely and without political retribution.”


Neera Tanden, nominee for director of the Office of Management and Budget, testifies at her confirmation hearing before the Senate Budget Committee on February 10, 2021 in Washington, DC. Tanden helped found the Center for American Progress.
(Photo by Anna Moneymaker-Pool/Getty Images)

Jessica Corbett
Sep 01, 2026
COMMON DREAMS

A diverse coalition of around 150 organizations on Tuesday collectively spoke out against US President Donald Trump’s recent attack on the Center for American Progress, a liberal think tank with ties to the Democratic Party establishment.

The Republican president, through one of his lawyers, threatened to sue the center last month over its July report concluding that there was no evidence his deployment of the National Guard in Washington, DC did anything to reduce violent crime.

“Since our nation’s founding, the rights to free speech, association, and the press have been the bedrock on which American democracy has thrived,” begins the coalition’s statement, spearheaded by Nonprofits Together. “We reaffirm, as has each generation before us, our unqualified commitment to the First Amendment and its foundational protections.”

“In so doing, we stand in strong solidarity with the Center for American Progress (CAP), a nonpartisan think tank, and its right to publish expert analysis on the impact of the Trump administration’s—or any administration’s—policies,” it continues. “The free exchange of ideas—including ideas that are inconvenient to those in power—is critical for Americans to understand the nature and impact of the actions of their government.”

Trump’s legal attack on CAP is just “the latest salvo in the administration’s ongoing efforts to suppress the speech of organizations that challenge their policies, defend the rule of law, and protect civil rights and vulnerable communities,” the coalition noted.

Other authoritarian attacks—as detailed last December in the Free Press report “Chokehold: Donald Trump's War on Free Speech & the Need for Systemic Resistance”—include the White House taking control of the presidential press pool, legal action such as Trump’s lawsuit against Rupert Murdoch and the The Wall Street Journal over reporting on the president’s ties to deceased sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, and the administration working to deport foreign scholars and journalists who criticize US policy.


Stressing that there are often disagreements “even within think tanks,” the coalition warned Tuesday that attempting to silence sources of information “degrades our free exchange of ideas, and risks leaving only distortions in the public square.”

“This is infinitely more damaging to our democratic ideals when done for purely political purposes,” the groups argued. “There are few issues more fundamental to the First Amendment than the right of an independent organization to publish evidence-based analysis of a government policy and how it is or is not working.”

“This is not about ideology or partisanship,” the organizations continued. “This is true regardless of who is in power, and who is issuing public critiques of that power. We stand with the Center for American Progress, not in agreement with every view they hold, but in steadfast support for their rights to voice those views freely and without political retribution.”

The signatories range from environmental, labor, and legal groups to those focused on faith, housing, immigration, LGBTQ+ rights, reproductive freedom, and more. They include the ACLU, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Drug Policy Alliance, Economic Policy Institute, Giffords, Greenpeace USA, Human Rights Campaign, Indivisible, National Education Association, Oxfam America, Public Citizen, and Union of Concerned Scientists.



CAP was founded in 2003 by John Podesta, who has served in various roles under former Democratic Presidents Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, and Joe Biden. The center’s current president, Neera Tanden, has also worked for key party leaders. In response to Trump’s threat last month, she emphasized that the think tank “is an independent, nonpartisan research organization, and our work is grounded in rigorous, evidence-based research and analysis.”

Blasting the threatened lawsuit as “baseless” and “a transparent attempt to silence us,” Tanden pledged that “we will neither cower nor bend in the face of it.”

“In America, profound disagreements over public policy are resolved through robust public debate, not through threats or intimidation,” she added. “Independent data, evidence, and analysis are essential to that debate. Efforts to silence independent research because its findings are unwelcome by an administration or president should alarm every American.”

Saturday, August 29, 2026

 

‘Disgusting’: Donald Trump faces backlash for posting AI image of him and Dolly Parton

‘Disgusting’: Donald Trump faces backlash for posting AI image of him and Dolly Parton
Copyright Screenshot Truth Social / X

By David Mouriquand 
Published on

In one of his latest AI slop posts, Trump took to Truth Social to share an AI-generated illustration of him arm in arm with Dolly Parton walking around the White House. This was a step too far for fans of the artist, who died this week and has left millions mourning her loss.

When Donald Trump added his name to the many public figures and celebrities paying heartfelt tributes to Dolly Parton, everyone feared the worst.

Thankfully, Trump ordered flags to be lowered at half-mast to honour the beloved artist, and wrote on Truth Social: “This is a true loss for millions of people. There has never been anyone like her, and never will. In her honor, I am lowering the American flag throughout the United States for a one week period beginning tonight at 6:00PM. Rest in Peace, Dolly! The world loves you.”

This tribute was initially met with applause, with even Trump’s harshest critics commending him for the gesture.

However, it didn’t take long for certain fans to point out that Dolly Parton’s Imagination Library – a literacy initiative which has gifted more than 330 million books to children since 1995, and one of Parton’s many philanthropic causes - has been defunded by the Trump administration.

This led many fans to call out Trump for being a hypocrite, and matters weren’t helped when he phoned The Glenn Beck Progam this week and claimed that Parton “really liked” him.

People further slammed Trump and pointed out that Parton stood for everything Trump doesn’t: tolerance, respect and bringing people together.

Now, in one of his latest AI slop posts, Trump took to Truth Social to share an illustration of him arm in arm with Parton walking around the White House.

This was another step too far for those who admire Parton, with many taking to social media to condemn Trump and his AI-generated post.

“Trump felt Dolly Parton was getting too much attention,” wrote one account, while another commented: “This picture is vile. Dolly Parton never appeared in pictures with him, nor do I think she would ever agree to. To place her in a picture on his arm is like taking the most beautiful soul imaginable, and throwing a disgusting bucket full of foul trump on her.”

The post continued: “Dolly Parton was kind, generous, and famously a friend of the LGBTQ community -- she was the exact opposite of trump in every way possible. "I know them, and love them all, and I do not judge," is what she said about trans people. trump spreads LIES about trans people, saying schools are secretly transitioning children against their parents' wishes. She wasn't obsessed with putting her name on things, but she DID leave a legacy of literacy behind, as her Imagination Library delivered 300,000,000 free books to children, from birth to age 5. trump, meanwhile, has his ICE goons arrest and deport 5 years olds like little Liam Tadeo. He will never, EVER, possess even a tiny fraction of the grace, love, and virtue Dolly had in her pinky.”

The post has gone viral, with many adding that Trump’s AI image was “heartless and brainless” and that Parton refused to be in the same room as Trump.

Check out some of the reactions below:

Dolly Parton kept out of party politics. “I don't do politics. I have too many fans on both sides of the fence,” she once said. However, she did reject Trump's Presidential Medal of Freedom twice during his first term.

Parton’s sister Stella – who recently revealed that Parton offered to undergo experimental cancer treatment to help others - has made her feelings very clear about Trump.

In the days leading up to the country music legend’s death, she posted: “As a natural born citizen of the United States of America, I do not support nor do I agree with Trump or his deranged, ugly, nasty behavior.”

The post, which was taken offline following the death of her sister but screenshot by Raw Story, added: “Many of us are disgusted and feel threatened by his actions and his cabinet, Republican sycophants and the majority of the SCOTUS."

Dolly Parton’s Imagination Library was inspired by her father’s inability to read or write. The programme sends one free book every month to children from birth to five - regardless of family income – in the US, Canada, UK, Australia and Ireland.

The Imagination Library has vowed to continue the singer’s work, saying her vision was always to build something that would “last for generations”.

In a statement, the organisation said: “The world grieves with us today. And yet we find ourselves just as certain about what comes next. For decades, Dolly & the team at The Dollywood Foundation – home of Dolly Parton's Imagination Library – worked to build something that would last for generations. So it will. The work ahead has never felt more meaningful, and we will carry it forward as she lifts us all up. Dolly, we will always love you.”

Parton’s family has requested that donations may be made to Dolly Parton’s Imagination Library at imaginationlibrary.com.