It’s possible that I shall make an ass of myself. But in that case one can always get out of it with a little dialectic. I have, of course, so worded my proposition as to be right either way (K.Marx, Letter to F.Engels on the Indian Mutiny)
An estimated 7 to 9 million people joined some 3,000 No Kings demonstrations across the United States on October 17 to encourage voters to vote and to defend the vote. The liberal organizations leading No Kings—Indivisible, the American Civil Liberties Union, the American Federation of Teachers, and Black and Latino voters’ group—called for a non-partisan demonstration. Certainly, there were many Independents and some Republicans present, but, like three earlier No Kings protests, this was another massive movement against President Donald Trump. [1]
“I think the president is breaking our country,” said Vic Cerra, a Vietnam War veteran, speaking to a reporter in Wheeling, West Virginia. “He’s destroying our friendships with other countries; with our neighbors to the north and our neighbors to the south. He’s fighting a war we don’t need to be fighting. Taking money away from programs that should be helping our people. We need a change and voting is the best way to do it.”
With the midterm election coming on November 3, participants’ placards, speeches, and chants angrily criticized everything they hate about Trump’s last two years: the war on Iran, higher fuel prices, climate change, the firing of thousands of federal employees, the reduction in government health, education, and social welfare programs, Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s violent attacks on immigrants, the oligarchy of billionaires, the erosion of civil rights, threats to democracy, the proliferating construction of data centers, the unregulated expansion of artificial intelligence, and the 150,000 Flock cameras that track every movement of our cars.
Carrying a large sign reading “Defend Democracy,” Kelsea Bond, a labor organizer and member of the Atlanta City Council, speaking at a rally in Atlanta, Georgia, said, “We need to build a society that works for the working class, not the billionaires.” Her remarks were met with cheers and she went on, “We need an economy, we need a society that is democratically run by working people because we keep this economy running.”
This latest No Kings protest was not built around mass marches in the big cities, but rather around local protests everywhere. Wherever they were held, many of those participating were older people in their 60s and 70s while young people were few.
An official No Kings slogan was “Hands Off My Ballot.” No Kings organizers, protest participants, and millions of other Americans fear that Trump may try to steal the election or even launch another coup such as the one he attempted on January 6, 2021. The U.S. Constitution gives the states virtually total control over elections, with Congress having some oversight, and the president no role whatsoever. The Trump administration, however, has been trying to get access to the voter rolls of 31 states, supposedly to ensure that non-citizens are not voting. Trump has also suggested that ICE agents or the military might be sent to polling places on election day in violation of the federal laws that forbid armed people at voting sites. These are seen as efforts to intimidate voters and keep them from casting their ballots. They could also be the first step in a coup, leading to the seizure of ballots and a declaration that the election is invalid.
So, the key slogan of the demonstrations was “Vote Early.” Some 47 of the country’s 50 states permit early voting, getting the ballots into the hands of trusted state and local officials to collect and count them fairly. In this way, protecting the vote from Trump’s shenanigans.
Esther RodrÃguez, 73, participating in Denver, Colorado said, “I’m going to do everything I can to participate in active resistance against what is happening in this country. We have to preserve our democracy.”
Dan La Botz was a founding member of Teamsters for a Democratic Union (TDU). He is the author of Rank-and-File Rebellion: Teamsters for a Democratic Union (1991). He is also a co-editor of New Politics and editor of Mexican Labor News and Analysis.
Image by Victoria Pickering/Wikimediacommons, licensed via CC BY 4.0
We are less than three weeks away from a critical midterm election—the first since Donald Trump returned to power. In the last two years, Trump has raced through the authoritarian playbook. The speed and scope of this autocratic offensive has been truly staggering. Yet as I wrote this spring, the acceleration of MAGA’s fascist project has intensified its contradictions, opening the possibility for a democratic resurgence just as sweeping.
While midterm elections generally favor the party out of power, all indicators point toward a large anti-MAGA backlash well beyond a typical midterm correction. This spring, I outlined three potential scenarios: a “blue wave” like 2018; a “landslide” like Reagan’s 1980 rout; or, at the outer limits of the possible, a “realignment” analogous to Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s 1932 election.
Currently, polling averages paint a picture somewhere between my “wave” and “landslide” scenarios. Democrats are ahead by roughly 8.8 points on the generic Congressional ballot. Polls increasingly project they will retake both chambers of Congress. Election analyst Nate Silver forecasts 52 Senate seats—in line with my “landslide” range—while predicting a more modest 238 seats in the House, closer to a conventional wave. (MAGA’s egregious new racial gerrymanders may account for some of that gap.)
Polls, notoriously, can be biased—in either direction. If they overstate Democratic support, we could see a smaller wave, with a narrower House majority and Republicans retaining the Senate. But if they understate it, we could be looking at a truly massive landslide. Republican spending suggests they fear the worst: GOP groups are pulling millions from states like North Carolina to defend Kansas, Iowa, Nebraska, and South Carolina, and pouring money into dozens of previously “safe” House races. Democratic wins in some of these states and districts could open the way to a once-unthinkable 54- or 55-seat Senate majority and perhaps 250 House seats.
Of course, under partial but intensifying autocracy, it is not enough to win elections—we also have to defend them. We know for sure that Trump and MAGA will attempt to undermine the vote, because they already have—through gerrymandering, voter purges, disinformation, and federal attacks on voting. In the weeks and months ahead, risks to election integrity will unfold in three phases: potential interference with the casting of ballots between now and November 3; potential obstruction of accurate counting and certification in the weeks after the election; and potential attempts to prevent duly elected members from taking their seats as the new Congress takes office in January. Pro-democracy forces will need to be prepared to withstand these and other potential challenges.
It will take a very broad, multi-tendency front to defend our flawed and imperfect democracy against the fascist threat. The more decisively the left demonstrates our ability to contribute to that fight, the more people we can rally to our vision, the more influence we will gain, and the greater our ability to push for a Third Reconstruction.
Therefore, we on the left have a responsibility to meet this moment with everything we’ve got. Coming off a strong primary cycle, we now need to bring that energy into the fight against our main enemy: the MAGA New Confederacy. In some races, that means rallying behind progressive champions like Randy Villegas, William Lawrence and Abdul El-Sayed. In others, it means extending tactical support to centrist candidates—sometimes the very ones we were just fighting in the primaries.
Two Key Tasks: GOTV and Election Defense
We have two key tasks before us in the weeks and months ahead. Between now and election day, we need to mobilize voters in numbers too big to rig. Then, if the election results are undermined, we must take to the streets to stop the cheat.
1. Numbers Too Big to Rig
While many are already looking ahead to election protection, it’s worth remembering that the best election defense is a good election offense. Close elections are especially vulnerable to subversion; the bigger the margins, the harder the results are to manipulate, deny, or overturn. That means our core job from now to election day is to do everything we can to get out the vote.
People should also plug into canvassing, phone banking, and other GOTV work wherever they can have the greatest impact. For many of us, that’s close to home. The Congressional battlefield extends well beyond the familiar “purple” states; there are at least 20 states with competitive House or Senate races, with some of the tightest in deep-red Texas and deep-blue California. Backlash against MAGA could broaden the battlefield even further, as we are seeing with tightening polls in states like Kansas, Nebraska, and South Carolina. A strong enough wave could even turn the post-Callais gerrymanders into “dummymanders”—allowing us to expand the map and protect Black and Brown political power in the South.
Moreover, the electoral battlefield is not just Congressional. Because our federal system gives enormous authority to the states, state-level races have a critical impact on the balance of power at both the state and national level. The latest round of Republican gerrymanders is just one illustration of the critical importance of state trifectas—control of the governorship and both legislative chambers. Forecasts suggest there are at least five states where we could break Republican trifectas, and six where we could win new Democratic ones.
If you live in an area with important state or federal races, plug into local GOTV efforts and make sure your friends and family have a plan to vote. If your area does not have competitive races on the ballot, you can support efforts to get out the vote elsewhere. National organizations like Showing Up for Racial Justice (SURJ) offer opportunities to phone bank remotely, and Seed the Vote is coordinating travel to critical swing districts, working with partner organizations on the ground. You might focus on nearby battlegrounds or places where you have personal ties, or prioritize left-progressive candidates and fights against racial gerrymandering. (Justin Pearson in Tennessee combines both priorities—one of the reasons I think it is among the most critical races of this cycle.)
2. Take to the Street to Stop the Cheat
After the election, the focus shifts to ensuring that votes are fairly counted and honored. Election defense work has three overlapping stages: ballot curing in the days immediately after voting; local and state mobilizations during counting and certification; and nationwide mobilizations if attempts are made to block the seating of the new Congress.
Immediately after the election, people can help with ballot curing wherever state rules allow, helping voters resolve problems that might otherwise prevent valid ballots from being counted. This work is local and time-sensitive: curing deadlines vary by state and can come just days after the election.
Through November—and, in some states, December—we should be ready to organize and join big “Hands Off Our Vote” mobilizations in the event of attempts to stop the vote count or obstruct certification. This is most likely in places where close results could determine control of Congress, and/or where MAGA officials have the ability to obstruct counting or certification.
Once state results are certified, attention shifts to Congress. If Trump or Republican congressional leaders try to delay the swearing-in of duly elected members or obstruct the transfer of congressional control, we should be ready for nationwide mobilizations in December and early January, demanding that elected members take their seats and the new Congress be allowed to exercise its authority.
Build Organization Beyond November
Wherever possible, we should pursue these two key tasks in ways that strengthen place-based, member-driven organization. Traditional candidate campaigns fold up after Election Day, and in most places Democratic Party structures do little to organize people beyond turning them out to vote. Pursuing election work through grassroots movement organizations can help us win the immediate fight while building a base, developing leaders, and strengthening our power beyond November.
Which organizations to focus on depend on your context. If you’re already involved with a local group or a member of a union, start there. Find out what plans they have for GOTV and election protection. If they don’t yet have a plan, help connect your organization to existing local and state efforts. For union members, your local Central Labor Council (CLC) can be a good place to start.
Liberation Road has long called for building independent political organizations (IPOs) that combine electoral organizing with year-round base-building and leadership development, without formally functioning as a traditional political party. State-level IPOs like the Carolina Federation, New Virginia Majority, and the Ohio Organizing Collaborative put this approach into practice. All three belong to State Power Caucus, which brings together similar organizations. People’s Action and Movement Voter Project also support groups combining electoral work and community organizing, and their directories can help you find organizations near you.
While many left-progressive groups are converging around this IPO strategy, we still lack a single shared political vehicle at the national level. Two very different organizations that aspire to that role are the Democratic Socialists of America and the Working Families Party. Depending where you live, one or the other might be a good place to plug in—but look at what they’re doing locally. DSA chapters with a mass-politics orientation offer a fantastic political home; but amid factional infighting, other chapters remain sectarian and isolated. WFP’s work likewise varies from state to state depending on which individuals and organizations are leading it. (And with its direct membership model still developing, joining one of those partner groups may be the best way to get involved.)
Depending on where you live, local chapters of other national groups like Indivisible and Sunrise might be the best place to plug in. Black Voters Matter is coordinating tours across the South to support local Black groups that combine electoral and community organizing. And for white allies, SURJ is doing some of the most impactful electoral organizing out there.
As this diversity suggests, left-progressive political infrastructure remains fragmented and uneven. A critical task beyond November is to bring these organizations into closer alignment around a shared strategy—building a whole greater than the sum of its parts.
From Resistance to Refusal, on the Road to Reconstruction
A decisive victory in November will open a new phase in the protracted struggle against the MAGA New Confederacy. For the past two years, pro-democracy forces were on the strategic defensive. Locked out of power at the federal level, we have largely been in resistance mode. Wresting back control of Congress will allow us to move from resistance to refusal. We will have more power to block the further advance of Trump’s fascist project, even as we don’t yet have the ability to implement our own agenda—a strategic stalemate. We must then use that strengthened position to ready the ground for a strategic counteroffensive in 2028.
Having Democratic House and Senate majorities would greatly strengthen our ability to halt the Trump regime’s corruption and lawless violence. The House can impeach officials responsible for abuses, the Senate can block judicial appointments, and both chambers must reclaim the power of the purse—compelling the administration to spend funds as Congress directs, and using budget negotiations to refuse further money for wars and deportations. Given the fecklessness of Democratic House and Senate leadership, it will take sustained mass pressure to make them use these powers—and we should push for leadership challenges if they refuse.
States that break Republican trifectas can pursue a similar strategy, blocking MAGA’s agenda even where we cannot yet enact our own. In states like Florida and Georgia, winning the governorship would give us veto power over reactionary legislation, and greater leverage over budget negotiations, in addition to the direct powers of the executive branch. Our movements must press governors to use those powers to block attacks on abortion and LGBTQ+ rights, strengthen voting access, protect workers, and fight for Medicaid expansion and an end to state cooperation with ICE.
States that emerge from the election with new or strengthened Democratic trifectas will become our forward operating bases. Here, we can move beyond blocking MAGA’s agenda to advancing our own: expanding healthcare, housing, and workers’ rights; protecting immigrants and bodily autonomy; and enacting bold structural reforms to our system of government.
Minnesota provides one example of what that can look like. After winning a state trifecta in 2022, Democrats moved quickly to enact a sweeping agenda: paid family and medical leave; free breakfast and lunch for all public school students; tuition-free public college; expanded immigrant, reproductive, and trans rights; and a plan for 100% carbon-free electricity by 2040. Though that bold agenda passed in a single legislative session, it was the product of years of organizing by labor and social movements to build a shared program, and the power to win it.
Our movements urgently need to ready the ground for something similar at the federal level, so we can push for and take advantage of a strategic counter-offensive in 2028. Assuming we win House and Senate majorities and the presidency, we will have a narrow window in which to act.
Winning electoral ground this November strengthens our starting position: newly elected senators will still hold their seats in 2028, while House victories give us incumbents to defend. But electoral gains alone will not prepare us to govern. We need to forge a shared agenda bold enough to rally millions—and an organized movement strong enough to win it.
Our agenda must match the scale of the crises we face. We must be ready to deliver universal healthcare, childcare, and eldercare; build social housing; strengthen workers rights; implement a just transition to renewable energy; and guarantee reproductive and gender freedom. And we must transform the institutions that obstruct those gains: expanding and democratizing the Supreme Court, securing statehood for DC and self-determination for Puerto Rico, passing the John Lewis Voting Rights Act, and replacing rigged electoral maps with free and fair ones.
We must start organizing for that transformation now. Our movements must bring our members together to discuss demands, connect immediate fights to structural change, and forge a common governing agenda. By 2028, we need millions of people who have helped shape this agenda, are organized to fight for it, and will demand that those we elect deliver it.
Together, we can turn an electoral opening against autocracy into a mandate to expand, transform, and fundamentally reconstruct our democracy. Only then can we truly break the power of the MAGA New Confederacy and launch a Third Reconstruction.
This article was originally published by The New Liberator; please consider supporting the original publication, and read the original version at the link above.
‘Democracy’s on the Line’: NYC Unions Unite to Protect Elections
Hundreds of workers from a score of unions packed the two-block-wide steps of New York City’s main post office Oct. 15 for a rally launching a labor campaign to protect elections from tampering by the Trump administration.
A five-piece drums-and-horns combo from American Federation of Musicians Local 802 pumped out a New Orleans-style parade beat while Laborers Union organizer Anthony Williamson led chants of “Union in the house” and “This is what democracy looks like.”
“Look at this crowd,” Laborers International Union Vice-President Mike Hellstrom declared. “Private sector, public sector, different trades, standing together shoulder to shoulder with one clear message—the labor movement will defend democracy.”
If anybody attempts to steal the election, he added, the labor movement will mobilize communities, protest peacefully, and document intimidation of voters.
“We need to make sure that every ballot is counted, that people can exercise their right to vote without interference,” New York City Central Labor Council President Brendan Griffith told the crowd. “That should not be controversial.”
The principle that “we pick our leaders,” said Communications Workers of America Local 1180 secretary-treasurer Robin Blair-Batte, is now “under pressure.”
“We fought for the Voting Rights Act,” she reminded.
32BJ SEIU President Manny Pastreich also hailed the coalition of “janitors with construction workers, security officers with nurses.”
Griffith told Work-Bites the coalition began with various unions expressing concerns and built momentum from there. “Democracy affects all workers,” he said. The crowd included members of at least 20 unions, with large contingents from the Laborers, 32BJ, and 1199SEIU, along with electrical workers, painters, nurses, City University faculty, retail workers, theatrical and stage workers, hotel workers, the public-sector union DC37, and more.
Two specific attempts by the Trump administration to limit the right to vote have so far failed. The SAVE Act, which would require people to register to vote in person—banning registration by mail, at motor-vehicle bureaus, or online—and document their citizenship with a passport or birth certificate (plus a marriage license, for women who changed their names), narrowly passed the House in April 2025, but a threatened filibuster blocked it in the Senate.
On March 31, Trump issued an executive order to prohibit mail-in voting except by people on a list of eligible voters that states submitted to the Postal Service at least 60 days in advance, using only an officially designed envelope with specific markings. The Postal Service issued a rule on August 26 that it would not accept mail ballots from states that did not provide such lists, but a federal judge in Massachusetts issued an injunction against it. On Sept. 14, the Supreme Court refused to lift that injunction.
“We beat him back,” American Postal Workers Union President Jonathan Smith told Work-Bites after the rally. “Our oath is to deliver America’s mail, not to decide who can vote.”
The APWU filed an amicus brief in that case arguing that the rule infringed on both the states’ constitutional power to regulate elections and the Postal Service’s constitutional obligation to deliver the mail.
Voting by mail is “not a convenience,” APWU Local 10 President Joseph Martir told the rally. It’s a necessity for people in the military, students, and a large share of the elderly.
The union plans to have election monitors “in every station” in the last two weeks before the election,” Smith said, to “make sure every ballot gets out.” Ninety-nine percent of mail ballots reach their destination within seven days, and 97% do within three days, he added.
But what the country is up against is a president who repeatedly insists that he won the 2020 election, has made that delusional belief a loyalty test for his government and party, sent 1,500 goons into the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021 to disrupt Joe Biden’s certification as President-elect, and pardoned them all immediately upon taking office again on January 20, 2025.
He controls the machinery of federal law enforcement. What would happen if, for example, armed ICE agents, not exactly known for their respect for people with Spanish accents who say they’re U.S. citizens, showed up outside polling places in swing-district towns with significant Latino populations?
32BJ is sending volunteer pollwatchers into swing Congressional districts in the Hudson Valley and on Long Island. “We don’t know if Trump and his supporters might try to intimidate people, but a crime or disturbance is less likely to happen if people are watching,” says Justin Lashley-Maloney, a night-shift doorman and “proud 32BJ member” for 13 years.
Griffith said the unions are doing pollwatching, helping people understand their rights, and working for a large turnout. He said he hoped “that these races are not close and that the results are clear.”
If ICE interferes with the election, “the labor movement’s going to respond,” he added.
“To the Trump administration and his criminal network: Democracy belongs to all of us. Democracy’s on the line, am I right?” 1199SEIU executive vice president Mike Ashby told the crowd. “This fight is bigger than immigration. This fight is bigger than unions.”
This article was originally published by Work-Bites; please consider supporting the original publication, and read the original version at the link above.
Puerto Rican Communities Bear the Brunt of the Water Crisis
The archipelago’s current water crisis, the product of a colonial system of debt, austerity, and extraction, cannot be solved by community organizing alone.
Image by USDAgov/Wikimediacommons, in public domain
As a child, visits to my grandmother’s home in the rural area between the municipalities of Humacao and Yabucoa, in eastern Puerto Rico, often began with the same question: “Is there running water?” Decades later, we have stopped asking—not because the problem has been solved, but because we already know the answer. She either has no running water at all or lives with such low water pressure that access remains uncertain.
Community-based organizations across Puerto Rico, particularly in rural areas, have long organized to demand access to running water, but public officials often treat this struggle as a problem of the past. Yet the water-rationing program initiated by the Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority (PRASA) on August 7 in response to an anticipated drought caused by the El Niño phenomenon reveals how persistent the problem remains. Although the program was recently suspended following temporary relief from cloud-seeding efforts, declining reservoir levels recorded on September 21—nearly a week after the intervention—underscore why Puerto Rico’s water crisis cannot be understood as a matter of climate alone.
The water crisis predates the current drought. PRASA has long struggled with deteriorating infrastructure, compounded by two unsuccessful privatization attempts between 1995 and 2004. Many communities have responded by developing their own aqueducts, but these initiatives cannot match the scale of the structural problem on their own.
Amid the drought, there are also growing concerns that El Súper Tubo, Puerto Rico’s main distribution pipeline, has reached the end of its useful life. In response, the government has called on residents and community organizations to prepare for drought conditions that could persist through the end of the year.
There is broad consensus in Puerto Rico on the importance of local communities in addressing the water crisis. Yet calls for communities to take the lead raise questions that demand a more nuanced approach. How is the burden of the water crisis distributed? What do calls for autonomous community action demand of local leaders and the everyday work of their organizations? How have the austerity measures imposed amid Puerto Rico’s debt crisis affected PRASA’s capacity to respond?
Who Bears the Burden of Puerto Rico’s Water Crisis?
The rationing affected an estimated 500,000 residents across San Juan, Trujillo Alto, LoÃza, Canóvanas, Juncos, Gurabo, and Carolina, many of whom continue experiencing interruptions and low water pressure. The burden of Puerto Rico’s water crisis falls along lines of race, class, and gender. In LoÃza—where 43 percent of the population lives in poverty and 32 percent identifies as Black or African American—residents have endured unreliable access to running water for nearly six months. Similarly, residents of Canóvanas—where 32 percent of the population lives in poverty and 15 percent identify as Black or African American—have faced this crisis for nearly six months. Among the seven municipalities affected by PRASA’s rationing program, LoÃza and Canóvanas have both the highest poverty rates and the largest proportions of residents who identify as Black or African American.
PRASA’s rationing program is not the only institutional response to the water crisis. Jennifer González Colón, Puerto Rico’s right-wing governor, declared a state of emergency through Executive Order 2026-035. The order attributes the crisis primarily to insufficient rainfall, prioritizes available water for potable use, and authorizes exemptions from standard procurement procedures. At the same time, communities and social movements have demanded more transparency from PRASA and González Colón over the management of the situation. In response, PRASA has threatened to fine residents for “misuse of water,” and Puerto Rico’s Department of Natural and Environmental Resources has deployed personnel in enforcement operations resembling police raids to identify residential and community wells it considers illegal.
Puerto Ricans remember how these politics of exceptionality created opportunities for private firms to profit after the widespread destruction caused by Hurricane MarÃa in 2017. The current crisis has also revived more intimate memories of MarÃa.
“This feels like going back to the times after Hurricane MarÃa. This activates my PTSD from [Hurricane] MarÃa,” one resident told me while collecting water from a tanker truck. We walked together briefly after filling our containers, and she ended our conversation with a clear statement: “This whole situation is not the result of insufficient rainfall. It is the result of the inefficiency of the people in charge.”
PRASA’s Unsustainability
Puerto Rico’s water crisis raises questions regarding PRASA’s situation under La Junta’s austerity measures. La Junta is the federally appointed fiscal control board created by Congress in 2016 to address the archipelago’s $70 billion in public debt and nearly $50 billion in pension liabilities. One of those drivers is PRASA. By 2017, the company had accumulated approximately $5 billion in debt, largely due to its reliance on borrowing to finance capital improvement projects. As part of its austerity agenda, referred to as government-rightsizing, La Junta initially pushed PRASA to reduce operating expenses, raise rates for its customers – 95 percent of whom are residential— and pursue private investment in infrastructure.
As a result, PRASA cut $30 million from its 2026-27 budget for replacing and renovating equipment. At the same time, in its PRASA 2025 Fiscal Plan, La Junta reported that the capital improvement budget had grown, largely through federal post-disaster recovery funds from the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Between 2019 and 2025, approximately $9 billion in federal funding was available for PRASA, of which $6.6 billion was obligated and $773 million disbursed, much of it in response to Hurricane MarÃa, Hurricane Fiona, and the earthquakes that struck Puerto Rico in 2020.
These numbers raise more questions than answers, especially given the repeated transparency and contracting scandals under González Colón’s administration. These controversies have ranged from fraud investigations involving procurement in the electric power sector to questionable contracting practices by VÃctor Ramos, secretary of the Department of Health. Hence, the biggest scandal of González Colón’s administration was the concerns over conflicts of interest and the alleged influence of former secretary of government Francisco Domenech in benefiting his former lobbying firm, Politank. These and other corruption allegations provide grounds for questioning the management of the current water crisis and PRASA’s use of its resources, particularly given the recent influx of recovery funds.
Community Responses
The resurgence of post-MarÃa collective memories of solidarity, community organizing, and mutual aid requires a more nuanced analysis in the context of the current water crisis. After MarÃa, autonomous recovery efforts were widely celebrated across Puerto Rican civil society, either as empowering forms of self-reliance or—among more progressive groups—as emancipatory practices that challenged profit-driven approaches to disaster recovery. Now, the water crisis is reviving these memories and familiar calls for communities to care for one another.
However, calls for communities to organize amid the water crisis and other emergencies can obscure the tensions that arise when residents are expected to fill gaps in governance themselves. In Puerto Rico, the burden of fulfilling the state’s role often falls on community leaders who devote hours of unpaid labor to helping neighbors who come to see them as substitutes for public officials. I witnessed these tensions while conducting research for my doctoral dissertation between 2022 and 2025, as community leaders and activists repeatedly expressed frustration with the growing expectation that they provide services and resources in the absence of public officials and state institutions.
One neighborhood activist I spoke with, who is unnamed to avoid jeopardizing her organization’s funding, runs a community agroecological project. When I asked about her workload as a neighborhood activist, she immediately questioned the popular slogan that “only the people save the people.” That slogan sounds nice, and we use it during protests and mobilizations. But sometimes I feel like, all of a sudden, I have another responsibility. Now I have to ‘save the people,’ many of whom don’t even care about what is happening around them,” she said.
Another organizer working in an impoverished community in the San Juan metropolitan area expressed her concern with burnout among local leaders: “Our problem is that the urgent always comes before the important,” they said.
Recognizing these burdens challenges romanticized views of community action, which often place heavy demands on community leaders, many of whom are women and older adults. It also reminds us that community organizing must constantly balance efforts to address broader structural problems with the need to provide practical solutions to people’s immediate needs. Moreover, communities and their leaders should not be expected to absorb the consequences of PRASA’s institutional limitations, Puerto Rico’s debt crisis, and La Junta’s austerity measures. The drought may be a natural emergency, but the water crisis is more than that. It is also the outcome of a colonial system in which debt, austerity, and extraction have shaped the infrastructure on which Puerto Ricans depend. Community organizing may help people survive the crisis, but it should not relieve those who produced it of responsibility.
Mikael E. Rosa Rosa is a full-time lecturer at the Beatriz Lassalle Graduate School of Social Work, University of Puerto Rico, RÃo Piedras CampusHe completed doctoral studies at the Crown Family School of Social Work, Policy, and Practice at the University of Chicago. His research and activist work focus on community organizing, colonialism, and neoliberal governance regimes.