Showing posts sorted by date for query SILICA. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query SILICA. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Wednesday, January 14, 2026

47 Ways Trump Has ‘Made Life Less Affordable’ in Second Term

“Trump’s actions since taking office a year ago reveal a clear and consistent effort... to serve the interests of his billionaire and corporate backers,” said a co-author of the Economic Policy Institute report.


Federal employees rally in support of their jobs outside of the Kluczynski Federal Building on March 19, 2025 in Chicago, Illinois.
(Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images)

Jessica Corbett
Jan 13, 2026
COMMON DREAMS


From “stripping collective bargaining rights from more than 1 million federal workers” to “denying 2 million in-home healthcare workers minimum wage and overtime pay,” President Donald Trump “has actively made life less affordable for working people.”

That’s according to a Tuesday report from the Economic Policy Institute (EPI), which cataloged 47 key ways that the 47th president made life worse for working people during the first year of his second term.



Nearly Half of Americans Say Their Financial Security Is Getting Worse Under Trump

The think tank sorted the actions into five categories: eroding workers’ wages and economic security; undermining job creation; weakening workers’ rights; enabling employer exploitation; and creating an ineffective government.

“Many of the actions outlined here have impacts across categories,” the report notes. “Trump’s attacks on union workers, for example, reduce workers’ wages, weaken workers’ rights, and promote employer exploitation of workers.”

“Every dollar denied to typical workers in wages ends up as higher income for business owners and corporate managers.”

The first section highlights that Trump (1) cut the minimum wage for nearly 400,000 federal contractors, (2) ended enforcement of protections for workers illegally classified as independent contractors, (3) slashed wages of migrant farmworkers in the H-2A program, (4) deprived in-home healthcare workers of minimum wage and overtime pay, and (5) facilitated the inclusion of cryptocurrencies among 401(k) investment options.

On the job creation front, the president (6) paused funding for projects authorized under a bipartisan infrastructure law, (7) signed the Laken Riley Act as part of his mass deportation agenda, (8) revoked an executive order that created a federal interagency working group focused on expanding apprenticeships, (9) is trying to shutter Job Corps centers operated by federal contractors, and (10) disrupted manufacturing supply chains with chaotic trade policy.



In addition to (11) attacking the union rights of over 1 million government employees, Trump (12) delayed enforcement of the silica rule for coal miners, (13) proposed limiting the scope of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s general duty clause, (14) fired National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) General Counsel Jennifer Abruzzo, (15) stripped work permits and temporary protections from immigrants lawfully in the country, and (16) deterred worker organizing with immigration enforcement actions.

Trump’s assault on workers’ rights has included (17) nominating Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer, who has pursued a deregulatory agenda, (18) illegally firing Gwynne Wilcox from the NLRB, (19) ending funding to fight human trafficking and child and forced labor globally, and (20) terminating International Labor Affairs Bureau grants.

Chavez-DeRemer isn’t Trump’s only controversial pick for a key labor post. He’s also nominated (20) Jonathan Berry as solicitor of labor, (21) Crystal Carey as NLRB general counsel, (22) Scott Mayer as an NLRB board member, and (23) Daniel Aronowitz to lead the Employee Benefits Security Administration.

Trump has also (24) weakened workplace safety penalties for smaller businesses, (25) nominated Andrea Lucas as Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) chair, (26) revoked an executive order promoting strong labor standards on projects receiving federal funds, (27) appointed Elisabeth Messenger, the former leader of an anti-union group, to head the Office of Labor-Management Standards, (28) fired EEOC Commissioners Charlotte Burrows and Jocelyn Samuels, and (29) conducted systematic worksite raids that punished workers rather than improving wages and working conditions.

The president’s various “deliberate actions to weaken the federal government” have included (30) politicizing career Senior Executive Service officials, (31) firing most staff at the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, (32) nominating Brittany Panuccio as an EEOC commissioner, (33) and picking Project 2025 architect Russell Vought as Office of Management and Budget director.

He has also fired (34) Federal Labor Relations Authority Chair Susan Tsui Grundmann and (35) Merit Systems Protection Board Member Cathy Harris, and (36) tried to fire Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, whose case is set to be argued before the US Supreme Court next week. Trump further (37) fired Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Commissioner Erika McEntarfer over accurate economic data, and is attempting to shut down (38) the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and (39) the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service.

Additionally, the president (40) directed federal agencies to end the use of disparate impact liability, (41) put independent agencies under his supervision, (42) signed the so-called One Big Beautiful Bill Act that transfers wealth from working families to the ultrarich, (43) proposed a rule that would make it easier to fire federal employees for political reasons, and (44) issued an executive order on apprenticeships that does not require the government to consult with labor groups.

Finally, since returning to the White House, the Republican has (45) gutted the federal workforce, (46) directed US Attorney General Pam Bondi to challenge state laws that would regulate artificial intelligence technologies, and (47) fired 17 inspectors general.

“Trump’s actions since taking office a year ago reveal a clear and consistent effort to make life less affordable for working people in order to serve the interests of his billionaire and corporate backers,” said report co-author Celine McNicholas, EPI’s director of policy and general counsel, in a statement.

“Every dollar denied to typical workers in wages ends up as higher income for business owners and corporate managers,” McNicholas added. “This growing inequality is what is making life so unaffordable for workers and their families today.”

EPI released the report as the BLS published its consumer price index data for December, which show a 2.7% year-over-year increase in prices for everyday goods and services.

WSJ editorial slams flailing Trump as Americans 'tread financial water'


Matthew Chapman
January 13, 2026 
RAW STORY

The conservative Wall Street Journal editorial board had a dire assessment of Trump's current economy: he's effectively fiddling while it burns, rather than deliver on any of the GOP's more conservative, growth-focused policies.

"Regarding prices, the consumer-price index came in somewhat hotter than expected with an increase of 0.3% in December and 2.7% over the past 12 months. Overall inflation isn’t rising, but it also isn’t coming down. Increases last month were especially notable for categories of goods and services that Americans buy on a regular basis like shelter (0.4%), medical care (0.4%), food (0.7%) and energy bills (1%)."

The sectors that saw the most inflation disproportionately hit lower-income Americans, the board noted. Worse still, earnings aren't getting any better, the board wrote.

"Real average hourly earnings rose 0.7% during the first five months of this year, but income growth has since stalled. For production and nonsupervisory workers, real average hourly earnings have declined 0.2% since May. The reason is a bump in inflation in the summer months that erased the gains from wage increases."

"This goes a long way to explain why so many Americans feel as if they are treading financial water," wrote the board — and it makes Trump's legal bullying of the Federal Reserve to try to lower interest rates look even more counterproductive, since the Fed isn't even at its inflation target yet and doesn't have room to lower rates to what Trump wants.

Instead, the board concluded, Trump is scrambling to try to implement price controls — something that has been tried and failed in previous inflation spells — most recently controls on credit card interest.

"The President has recently been rolling out a flurry of counterproductive policies worthy of Bernie Sanders in the name of reducing prices (see the editorial nearby on credit-card interest rates). But what the President really needs is what he promised in the campaign, which is rising real wages," wrote the board. "That means further reducing inflation and letting deregulation and tax policy drive faster economic growth and productivity. That will make everything more affordable."

'Worst case scenario': Expert warns economic 'crash' risk grows by the day under Trump


Nicole Charky-Chami
January 12, 2026 
RAW STORY

An economic expert Monday warned that a looming stock market crash could be on the horizon as the Trump administration shows its penchant for chaos.

Bloomberg economics columnist Clive Crook responded to questions over why the economy has not crashed and how despite policy disruptions and predictions of "doom" from experts and economists, the stock market appears to be still doing well — yet that could change.

Crook argued that given the Trump administration's sweeping policy changes, including tariffs and a rocky political situation unfolding both in and outside the United States, that Trump's policies have not yet been vindicated.

"The fact that the markets have done incredibly well is not really an endorsement of Trump's policies," Crook said.

"Don't misunderstand me: There are aspects of Trump's policies that the financial markets do — as it were, rationally — welcome rationally regard as pro-growth. In particular, lower corporate taxes and efforts at deregulation, those are pluses in the market's mind. But there are also negatives alongside: trade policy fiscal and monetary policy."

The result has been more complicated than it might appear, he added.

"On balance, it's hard to say how those will work out," Crook said. "And the other big thing that needs to be emphasized is the hope or the prospect that AI innovation will transform growth going forward, will transform productivity. So I'm not saying there are aren't reasons to be optimistic. All I'm saying is in this bundle of conflicting information and conflicting narratives, there are negatives which persist regardless of where the markets go. And as it were the disorder and the disruption that this administration really revels in, as that continues, the risk of a crash creating the worst case scenario, then that risk grows — grows over time."

Trump’s Losing Streak Continues as Jobs Report Shows Weak 2025 Labor Market


WASHINGTON - The latest jobs report shows the United States added 50,000 jobs in December 2025, and prior months revised down by a combined 76,000 jobs. The unemployment rate remains elevated at 4.4% and is near its highest levels of the past four years. The December report caps a year of sluggish job growth, with the fewest number of jobs added outside of a recession since 2003. Hiring slowed sharply over the course of 2025 as Trump’s erratic economic policies froze the labor market.

Groundwork Collaborative’s Chief of Policy and Advocacy Alex Jacquez released the following statement:

“December’s job report confirms that Trump’s reckless trade policies and lifeless economy are costing Americans dearly. Working families face sluggish wage growth, fewer job opportunities, and never-ending price hikes on groceries, household essentials, and utilities. Despite the President’s endless attempts to deflect and distract from the bleak economic reality, workers and job seekers know their budgets feel tighter than ever thanks to Trump’s disastrous economic mismanagement.”

Job growth in 2025 fell far behind last year’s pace. Total job growth in 2025 was just 584,000, compared to 2 million jobs added in 2024 — a 71% slowdown.

Job gains remain narrowly concentrated in a small number of sectors. In December, job gains were concentrated in education and health services. Retail trade lost 25,000 jobs this holiday season, as budgets continue to be squeezed. The U.S. is shedding blue-collar jobs for the first time since the pandemic, with roughly 60,000 job losses in manufacturing, transportation and warehousing, and mining in 2025 while construction jobs stall out.

Long-term unemployment remains elevated. The number of people unemployed for six months or more remains at 1.9 million, increasing by roughly 400,000 compared to the year before. This points to rising financial strain for job seekers and growing unease among workers about job stability.

Official payroll statistics may overstate the number of jobs the economy is creating. Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell warned in December that headline job gains may be overstated by as many as 60,000 jobs per month. This is because the Bureau of Labor Statistics has to estimate job gains and losses at new and closing businesses that are difficult to survey directly. The lackluster jobs reports throughout 2025 may paint an overly rosy picture of the labor market.

New hiring has ground to a halt. The latest Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey data show that job openings fell to about 7.1 million in November from nearly 7.5 million in October, while the hiring rate dropped to 3.2 percent, one of the lowest levels since April 2020, when the pandemic-induced recession was underway. According to data from Challenger, Gray & Christmas, U.S. employers sharply pulled back on hiring plans in 2025. Announced hires fell to about 508,000, down 34 percent from nearly 770,000 in 2024, the lowest annual total since 2010, signaling much weaker employer confidence in expanding their workforce.

Saturday, January 10, 2026

 

How did these strange, ancient organisms turn into such remarkable fossils?



New research in Geology reveals why the 570-million-year-old Ediacaran Biota were so exceptionally preserved



Geological Society of America






How Did These Strange, Ancient Organisms Turn into Such Remarkable Fossils?

New Research in Geology reveals why the 570-million-year-old Ediacaran Biota were so exceptionally preserved.

Boulder, Colo., USA: In Earth’s fossil record, soft-bodied organisms like jellyfish rarely stand the test of time. What’s more, it’s hard for any animal to get preserved with exceptional detail in sandstones, which are made of large grains, are porous, and commonly form in environments swept by rough storms and waves. But around 570 million years ago, in a geologic time interval called the Ediacaran period, strange-looking, soft-bodied organisms died on the seafloor, were buried in sand, and fossilized in incredible detail. 

Now, these fantastical fossils are found in deposits around the world. Scientists want to discover why the Ediacara Biota were so well preserved—in particular, the reasons for their very unusual fossilization as impressions in sandstone—in part to fill in a critical gap in the evolution of macroscopic life on Earth. 
 

“The Ediacara Biota look totally bizarre in their appearance. Some of them have triradial symmetry, some have spiraling arms, some have fractal patterning,” says Dr. Lidya Tarhan, a paleontologist at Yale University. “It's really hard when you first look at them to figure out where to place them in the tree of life.”
 

The Ediacara Biota lived at a liminal moment just a few tens of millions of years before what geologists call the Cambrian Explosion, an episode that began about 540 million years ago, marked by flourishing diversity and complexity across nearly all evolutionary lineages of almost all animals living today. But more and more research suggests what Tarhan calls a “long fuse” to the explosion, and the rise of the Ediacara Biota formed a key stage of that slow burn.
 

Understanding how and why these Ediacara organisms are so exceptionally preserved is central to placing them in their evolutionary context and illuminating the origins of the complex life forms from which many animals, including humans, ultimately descend. A study from Tarhan and her colleagues published last month in a Geology paper titled “Authigenic clays shaped Ediacara-style exceptional fossilization” helps fill in that gap.
 

“If we want to understand the origins of complex life on Earth, the Ediacara Biota really occupies a critical point in that trajectory,” says Tarhan. “It's incredibly important, not just for the Ediacara Biota but for all exceptionally preserved fossil assemblages, that we try to figure out what are the mechanisms behind that exceptional fossilization so we can better gauge to what extent these fossil assemblages provide a faithful reflection of life on the ancient sea floor.”
 

To learn more, Tarhan and her team used a novel approach to determining what processes and minerals were at work when the Ediacara Biota organisms experienced death, burial, and fossilization. They measured isotopes of the element lithium in Ediacara Biota fossils found in Newfoundland and northwest Canada in deposits that are both sandy and muddy. The lithium isotopes helped the scientists determine whether clay minerals were involved in fossilization and, in particular, whether these were detrital, meaning they washed off the continents, or authigenic, meaning the clays precipitated in the sea floor.
 

The researchers found that detrital clay particles were present in the sediments that buried these organisms on the sea floor. These minerals then served as nucleation sites for authigenic clays to form from silica- and iron-rich seawater in the upper sea floor, driven by the unusual chemistry of the Ediacaran seawater. These clays acted like cement, holding together sand particles in the sandstone and preserving outlines and replicas of the soft-bodied forms of the Ediacara Biota.
 

This counters a longstanding idea that the exceptional preservation of the Ediacara Biota might have occurred because their bodies were made of a uniquely hardy substance. Instead, it was the chemistry of the environment that lent itself to fossilization, according to Tarhan and colleagues.
 

Going forward, Tarhan wants to apply this lithium isotope technique to more fossils from different locations and geologic ages to see if the same mechanism applies. In the meantime, Tarhan says their findings help fill in the picture of what the world was like at a critical time in the evolution of complex animal life on Earth.
 

“It's hard to overemphasize how dramatic of a change it is from the small and microbial life forms that dominate much of the Precambrian to the big step up in size and complexity” seen in the Ediacara Biota and Cambrian Explosion, says Tarhan. "A clearer understanding of the processes responsible for fossilization across this interval will allow us to more robustly evaluate longstanding hypotheses for drivers of not only the appearance of the Ediacara Biota but also for their subsequent disappearance at the close of the Ediacaran period."
 

About the Geological Society of America

The Geological Society of America (GSA) is a global professional society with more than 17,000 members across over 100 countries. As a leading voice for the geosciences, GSA advances the understanding of Earth's dynamic processes and fosters collaboration among scientists, educators, and policymakers. GSA publishes Geology, the top-ranked geoscience journal, along with a diverse portfolio of scholarly journals, books, and conference proceedings—several of which rank among Amazon's top 100 best-selling geology titles.

# # # 

UBCO innovation blocks nanoplastics release from landfill leachate



Dual-layer system intercepts most micro and nanoplastics before they reach water supplies



University of British Columbia Okanagan campus

UBCO innovation blocks nanoplastics release from landfill leachate 

image: 

UBC Okanagan doctoral student Mahmoud Babalar examines a sample of the dual-layer modified matrix membrane that can help retain pollutants like nano-plastics in landfill leachate, keeping them out of water supplies.

view more 

Credit: UBC Okanagan School of Engineering





UBC Okanagan researchers have created a new two-layer membrane filtration system that can significantly reduce the amount of micro and nanoplastics that leak from landfills into local water basins.

Dr. Sumi Siddiqua, Professor at UBCO’s School of Engineering, and doctoral student Mahmoud Babalar, have published a study detailing how a double-layer membrane installed at landfills can act as a filter to keep tiny pollutants out of groundwater and surrounding ecosystems.

“Landfills are silent threats to our environment, acting as major reservoirs for emerging pollutants,” says Dr. Siddiqua. “Conventional drainage systems fail against microscopic contaminants, including nanoplastics and hazardous chemicals. This allows them to infiltrate groundwater.”

Landfills generate leachate, a contaminated liquid that forms when rainwater passes through waste, Dr. Siddiqua explains. Although most landfills are designed to contain this liquid, recent studies show leachate has become a major collection basin for microscopic plastic, which can escape into water systems.

“As plastic waste breaks down, these particles accumulate in landfill leachate,” explains Babalar. “Current systems handle liquid waste, but they were never designed to completely intercept plastic micro and nano particles.”

The two-layer membrane system featured in their study, published recently in the Journal of Environmental Management, proved to be the most effective when it comes to trapping these pollutants. The top layer uses chemical attraction and filtration to capture micro and nanoplastics. It is engineered to bind plastic particles efficiently, even in complex, organic-rich leachate. The lower layer establishes a protective barrier that repels the remaining plastic particles through electrostatic forces, reducing clogging, membrane fouling and maintaining steady performance over time.

“The two complementary layers work together to block tiny plastic particles under harsh landfill conditions,” he adds. “This combination of layers allows the membrane to filter plastics while liquid can still flow, which is a critical requirement for landfill safety.”

In repeated lab tests, the membrane removed nearly all microplastics and captured more than 98 per cent of nanoplastics. Babalar says that during the testing, the membrane performed well over multiple filtration cycles, and could be cleaned and reused thanks to a methodical backwashing system.

“The membrane is made from durable, chemically stable materials designed to withstand temperature changes, aggressive wastewater and long-term exposure,” he adds. “Its ability to be cleaned and reused reduces waste and supports more sustainable landfill operations.”

Beyond filtration, the researchers say the technology could serve as a foundation for next-generation landfill liners that combine structural protection with active pollution control. This discovery has significant potential to protect groundwater and surface water supplies, reduce the spread of pollutants and also support circular waste management and climate-resilient infrastructure.

The study marks an important step toward smarter landfill systems that not only contain waste but also actively prevent long-term environmental harm, says Dr. Siddiqua.

“Our unique dual-layer modified matrix membrane system is specifically engineered to handle highly contaminated, fouling-intensive raw leachate, positioning it as a foundational component of advanced waste containment,” she adds. “This innovative approach is essential for preventing the migration of pollutants into groundwater, and it represents a significant advancement in waste management and climate-resilient infrastructure.”

Thursday, January 08, 2026

Bristol scientists discover early sponges were soft



University of Bristol
Bristol scientists discover early sponges were soft 

image: 

The diversity of sponges and their spicules. Sponges were the first reef builders and maintain a fundamental role in modern marine ecosystems.

view more 

Credit: From Top left to bottom right: The barrel sponge (Xestospongia testudinaria)is by Albert Kok at Dutch Wikipedia - Transferred from nl.wikipedia to Commons., Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=3017391. The demosponge spicules are by Ana Riesgo. The tube sponge (Pseudoceratina crassa) is by NURC/UNCW and NOAA/FGBNMS. - NOAA Photo Library: expl0628, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=17967456. The Branching tube sponge (Aiolochroia crassa) is by iNaturalist user: thibaudaronson - https://www.inaturalist.org/photos/12359922, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=89131968.




Sponges are among earth’s most ancient animals, but exactly when they evolved has long puzzled scientists. Genetic information from living sponges, as well as chemical signals from ancient rocks, suggest sponges evolved at least 650 million years ago. The research is published today [7 January] in Science Advances.

This evidence has proved highly controversial as it predates the fossil record of sponges by a minimum of  100 million years. Now an international team of scientists led by Dr M. Eleonora Rossi, from the University of Bristol’s School of Biological Sciences, have solved this conflict by examining the evolution of sponge skeletons. 

Living sponges have skeletons composed of millions of microscopic glass-like needles called spicules. These spicules also have an extremely good fossil record, dating back to around 543 million years ago in the late Ediacaran Period. Their absence from older rocks has led some scientists to question whether earlier estimates for the origin of sponges are accurate.

Dr Rossi and her team solved this mystery using a two-step approach. Firstly, they combined high-quality data from 133 protein-coding genes with fossil evidence to construct a new timescale for sponge evolution. They dated the origin of sponges to between 600-615 million years ago, closing the gap with the fossil record. Secondly, they investigated the evolution of sponge skeletons, revealing that spicules evolved independently in different sponge groups.

Dr Rossi, Honorary Research Associate, said: “Our results show that the first sponges were soft-bodied and lacked mineralised skeletons. That’s why we don’t see sponge spicules in rocks from around 600 million years ago — there simply weren’t any to preserve.”

Dr Ana Riesgo, a world-leading expert in sponge evolution from the Museum of Natural Sciences in Madrid (Spain) said: “We already had some clues that suggested sponge skeletons evolved independently. Modern sponge skeletons may look alike, but they’re built in very different ways. Some are made of calcite, the mineral that makes up chalk, others of silica, essentially glass, and when we examine their genomes we see that entirely different genes are involved.”

In order to reconstruct sponge skeleton evolution, the team used a statistical computer model. Dr Joseph Keating, also an author on the study, explained: “We used a Markov process, a type of predictive model that’s widely applied in fields like finance, AI, search engines, and weather forecasting. By modelling transitions between different skeletal types, including soft-bodied forms, we found that almost all models strongly reject the idea that the earliest sponges had mineralised skeletons. Only an unrealistic model treating all mineral types as equivalent suggests otherwise, and even then the results are ambiguous.”

The results of this study raise interesting questions about early sponge evolution. 

Professor Phil Donoghue, Professor of Palaeobiology at the University of Bristol said: “Given that nearly all living sponges have skeletons composed of mineralised spicules, we might naturally assume that spicules were important in early sponge evolution. Our results challenge this idea, suggesting that early sponge diversification was driven by something else entirely—and what that was is still a tantalising mystery.”

Professor Davide Pisani, Professor of Phylogenomics at the University of Bristol, concluded: “But this is not only about sponges. Sponges are the first lineage of reef building animals to evolve and might as well have been the very first animal lineage, although this is still debated. Understanding their evolution provide key insights on the origin of the very first reef systems. This is about how life and Earth co-evolved, and how the evolution of early animals changed our planet forever, ultimately enabling the emergence of the animal life forms we are familiar with, humans included”.