Showing posts sorted by date for query SPORTS STADIUM. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query SPORTS STADIUM. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Sunday, April 19, 2026

World Cup fans will have to pay $150 for NY stadium train ticket, officials say


A 58-km roundtrip train ride between New York and Meadowlands stadium will cost football fans $150 during the World Cup, local officials said Friday. The journey normally costs just $12.90.


Issued on: 17/04/2026 -
By: FRANCE 24
Just 40,000 tickets will be available for each of the games to be played at the New Jersey stadium, a return rail trip to which is typically just $12.90. © David Ramos, Getty Images North America via AFP

World Cup fans will have to pay $150 for the 58-km roundtrip train ride between New York and Meadowlands stadium when it hosts eight matches including the final, local officials said Friday.

Just 40,000 train tickets will be available for each of the games to be played at the New Jersey sports complex, a return rail trip to which is typically just $12.90, officials said at a briefing.

"We are going to charge $150 for our roundtrip ticket on our system. So from New York to MetLife, MetLife back to New York," said Kris Kolluri, the president and CEO of NJ Transit, using another name for the stadium.

After reports first emerged in The Athletic of the plans to charge World Cup fans far in excess of normal fares, New Jersey Governor Mikie Sherrill blamed FIFA for the price hikes.

She pointed to a $48 million bill the state faces to ensure the safety of fans going to the eight games at the MetLife stadium.

"I won't stick New Jersey commuters for that tab for years to come, that's not fair," Sherrill wrote on social media, adding that FIFA stood to make $11 billion at the World Cup.

"So here's the bottom line: Fifa should pay for the rides, but if they don't, I'm not going to let New Jersey commuters get taken for one."
'Quite surprised'

That sentiment was echoed by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, who wrote on social media on Tuesday that FIFA should foot the bill for transport costs to World Cup venues.

FIFA, which is already facing severe criticism over the sky-high cost of many match ticket prices, issued a strongly-worded statement criticising the transport price hike.

FIFA said that the original host city agreements "required free transportation for fans to all matches".

At the 2022 World Cup in Qatar, fans could use the Doha Metro for free with their matchday tickets.

A re-negotiation stipulated that transport would be offered "at cost" on match days, FIFA added.

"We are quite surprised by the NJ Governor's approach on fan transportation," FIFA said.

"The FIFA World Cup will bring millions of fans to North America along with the related economic impact."

It added: "FIFA is not aware of any other major event previously held at NYNJ Stadium, including other major sports, global concert tours, etc., where organisers were required to pay for fan transportation."

New York Governor Kathy Hochul was another to take aim at the reported price hike.

"Charging over $100 for a short train ride sounds awfully high to me," Hochul wrote on X.

Some $100 million in US federal funding has been allocated to host cities for transit network costs, including $8.7 million for Boston and Massachusetts, and $10.4 million for the New York-New Jersey area, according to local media reports.

(FRANCE 24 with AFP)

Saturday, April 18, 2026

Syria’s Kurds register for citizenship after decades of marginalisation


By AFP
April 15, 2026


"Unregistered" Kurds, who have been stateless since a controversial 1962 census, have been flocking to registration centres across Syria - Copyright AFP Delil SOULEIMAN


Gihad Darwish

In a packed hall in Qamishli’s sports stadium in northeast Syria, Firas Ahmad is one of dozens of Kurds waiting to apply for citizenship after many in the minority were barred from doing so for decades.

Since last week, “unregistered” Kurds, who have been stateless since a controversial 1962 census, have been flocking to registration centres across Syria to apply for citizenship, based on the interior ministry’s instructions.

“A person without citizenship is considered as good as dead,” Ahmad, 49, told AFP.

“Imagine not being able to register my children or our homes in our names,” he said, adding that “my grandfather never had citizenship, and we have been living without official documents ever since”.

On the tables facing long queues of people, registration forms were scattered along with personal photos and old documents, while government employees were recording the data.

The new measure follows Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa’s January decree granting citizenship to Kurds residing in the country, including those who have been unregistered for decades.

It also enshrines the Kurds’ cultural and language rights, and recognises Kurdish as a national language.

The decree came during weeks of clashes between Kurdish fighters, who once controlled swathes of northeastern Syria, and government forces after which an agreement was reached to integrate the Kurdish administration into the central state.

The integration included government forces entering the previously Kurdish-controlled cities of Hasakeh and Qamishli in February, and the appointment in March of senior Kurdish military leader Sipan Hamo as assistant defence minister for the eastern region, among other steps.



– ‘We suffered greatly’ –



The lack of citizenship affected many aspects of daily life, from the inability to register births and property ownership to difficulties in studying, moving around, travelling and working, leaving many without full legal recognition of their existence.

“We suffered greatly,” says Galya Kalash, a mother of five, speaking in Kurdish.

“My five children could not complete their education, and we could not travel at all. Even now, our house is not registered in our name.”

Around 20 percent of Syria’s Kurds were stripped of their Syrian nationality in a controversial 1962 census in the northeastern Hasakeh province.

Ali Mussa, a member of Hasakeh’s Network of Statelessness Victims, told AFP that there are around 150,000 unregistered people in Syria today.

There are around two million Kurds in Syria, most of them in the northeast.

Mussa called on authorities to show “flexibility in implementing the decision and to provide facilities for residents outside Syria” who may not be able to travel due to their refugee status in Europe or fear of flight disruptions due to the Middle East war.

Authorities are expected to keep registration centres open for a month.

Abdallah al-Abdallah, a civil affairs official in the Syrian government, told AFP the period could be extended.

“The most important compensation for these people is gaining citizenship after being deprived of it for all these years,” he said.

In the registration centre, Mohammed Ayo, 56, said not having citizenship made him feel “helpless”, including being unable to get a driver’s license or book a hotel room in capital Damascus as it required prior security clearance.

“You study for many years, and in the end they say you have no certificate,” he said, adding that, after finishing high school, he was unable to obtain an official document to study at university.

“We did not even have the right to run for office or vote.”

Monday, April 13, 2026

Trump As The GOAT (According to Him)


 April 13, 2026

Seven of the American League’s 1937 All-Star players: Lou Gehrig, Joe Cronin, Bill Dickey, Joe DiMaggio, Charlie Gehringer, Jimmie Foxx, and Hank Greenberg. Image Wikipedia.

Seventy-five years ago, my father and I gazed down from the stands at Joe DiMaggio and Mickey Mantle in the outfield at Yankee Stadium. I was thrilled by the sight of two heroes of my time, but Dad was not impressed. He had seen Babe Ruth.

I think about that now, in a time desperate for such symbolic representatives of our better selves, which we once derived from sports figures like Mickey, Joe, and the Babe. They distracted us from pain and poverty. They gave us hope. I wonder if the answer to “Where Have You Gone, Joe DiMaggio?” — that line from Simon and Garfunkel’s famed song “Mrs. Robinson” — is the same as to so many other wrenching questions these days: Donald Trump.

Consider the following: Until he wore himself (and his welcome) out with such excess, he was indeed superb at commanding attention and winning ugly. He was, in short, a loud, vulgar, greedy, self-absorbed cock of the walk who came to epitomize a new gilded age of power and irresponsibility. And yet, he also somehow came to represent citizens who felt oppressed and disdained by the new elite.

No, you’ve got it wrong. I’m not thinking about Donald Trump (not yet anyway). I’m describing Babe Ruth, the first of the Top Jock role models who captured the spirit of an American age. For the next hundred years, the Babe’s spawn strutted through America’s arenas until they petered out in basketball star Michael Jordan’s commercialism. Jordan was, like the rest of them, the best at what he did, while also embodying the zeitgeist of his time with a “greed is good” mantra exemplified by his notorious “Republicans buy sneakers, too” line (which he may never have said seriously).

From Babe Ruth to Michael Jordan, with the likes of Joe Louis, Jackie Robinson, Arnold Palmer, Joe Namath, Muhammad Ali, Billie Jean King, Dale Earnhardt, and Tiger Woods (among others) in between, Americans have regularly, if sometimes controversially, used sports figures to represent their aspirations.

Anointing Donald Trump as our current Top Jock figure is neither an attempt to curry favor — do you think I want to be the Minister of Sport? — nor an attempt to denigrate the position. It’s just an effort to better understand why those apparitional figures from SportsWorld seem to have disappeared from our collective consciousness in the age of You Know Who.

Where Did the Top Jocks Go?

This effort of mine started to take shape when I suddenly realized that, for the first time (in my memory) since childhood, America now seems to have no Top Jock, no celebrity athlete whose talent and personality captures our moment. Those who might be considered — LeBron James, Tom Brady, and Serena Williams — somehow seem to lack the sort of charisma Donald Trump does indeed have to reach beyond their hardcore fans to the rest of us.

After almost 70 years of following sports and writing about it professionally, I recently realized that I couldn’t recall another time when I wouldn’t have been able to name an already agreed-upon Top Jock, or at least propose half a dozen candidates. So, what’s up? In this fragmented Trumpian moment of ours, is sports finally losing its hold on us? Have we been losing our love for jocks for the first time in my memory? After all, highly accomplished athletes like Pete Rose and Barry Bonds are now being denied Hall of Fame plaques on moral grounds, while high school and college athletes are becoming teenage millionaires thanks to new laws regarding their ownership of their own images.

It seemed like an appropriate moment for summing up.

Having spent the past 20 years as TomDispatch‘s Jock Culture correspondent, I felt the need for a reckoning. What had I learned from the 50 essays I’d written so far? Was there any kind of personal touchdown I could point to? Had I truly caught the relationship between sports and the larger society — how they do or don’t reflect, direct, and/or motivate each other? Can I still face the issue of trans athletes or what rules there might be for which kinds of non-athletic transgressions should keep players out of sports halls of fame, or even explain how pro football and basketball have now essentially become Black sports? Must I keep analyzing the symbolism of games rather than just enjoying them? Can I feel comfortable in a world where brain trauma is treated as a reasonable cost of violent entertainment (much as school shootings are a permissible price for gun love)?

And, yes, I came to wonder just where Joe DiMaggio had gone and whether some other charismatic avatar of a fanatical cult might, in fact, have replaced him and all those other jock idols?

More than politicians (even Franklin D. Roosevelt or John F. Kennedy) or entertainers (Frank Sinatra, Elvis Presley, or the Beatles), sports figures — maybe because of the shooting star nature of their professional lives — had long been designated the avatars of American culture. And that was true even if, with the rarest of exceptions (perhaps Billie Jean King and Muhammad Ali), they left little of lasting spiritual value or impact.

And now, of course, we have DJT (Donald J. Trump) as the MVP (most valuable player) of, it seems, every competition. I suspect that he — or at least the world he represents — is the reason why we have no real sporting heroes anymore. After all, he sucks all the air out of all arenas, while providing an ongoing reality show that seems to fill our days and nights, superceding sports in every way imaginable.

Donald Trump eternally demands to be the GOAT — the Greatest of All Time — while distinctly turning our world into a Trumpian sports event.

Suggesting a Theory

I was surprised to find that, in most of the 50 essays I’d written for TomDispatch, whether they were purportedly about baseball, NASCAR, or the Super Bowl, there was always at least a passing reference to Donald Trump and, in all too many cases, he was the leading character. That led me to wonder whether such a reality just represented this particular writer’s obsession or had Trump truly enveloped our collective consciousness?

And, I wondered as well: was this inevitable? According to AI, when I tried to use it recently, I’ve described Jock Culture as helping to ingrain “the national psyche… with exclusivity, sexism, homophobia, and winning at any cost… a danger to the common good,” while I evidently predicted that “society will become a darker, more despotic place if it continues unchecked.”

There’s no question that the United States has become a significantly darker, more despotic place since, on January 17, 2017, just-about-to-be-president Donald Trump first appeared in a Jock Culture column of mine (the seventeenth, if you’re keeping count). The headline was “Football is Trump Ball Lite” and heralded an authentic call for democracy from an unlikely place, the most Trumpish of sports.

As I wrote then:

“Pro football actually helped prepare us for the new president’s upset victory by normalizing a basic tenet of jock culture: anyone not on the team is an enemy, the Other. And it’s open season on opponents, the fans of opponents, critics, and women (unless they’re cheerleaders or moms). Trash talking is the lingua franca of this Trumpian moment, bullying the default tactic.

“Yet pro football has also provided us with the single most vivid image of current American resistance to racism. Last summer, before a pre-season game, San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick sat during the playing of the national anthem as a symbol of his refusal ‘to show pride in a flag for a country that oppresses black people and people of color.’”

The outcome, however, would prove shocking. Trump, who entered the Oval Office three days after that column of mine appeared, won two of his three matches, while Kaepernick never played again after that 2016-2017 season.

Maybe we shouldn’t have been shocked, though. Maybe the predictors never got the odds right. Maybe they didn’t understand what we wanted from our sports idols — or what their limits were. How about this: Consider the relative paucity of sports figures in the Epstein Files, especially compared to groups like academics, financiers, politicians, and even comedians. Jeffrey Epstein pursued people who could be useful to him as enablers, investors, connectors, or victims. Woody Allen was high on the list, but there was no Lebron James or Tom Brady (although Brady’s long-time owner, billionaire Robert Kraft of the New England Patriots, certainly made the cut).

Was it because celebrity athletes have no need of being set up with playthings or because Epstein didn’t believe they had the kind of clout that could benefit his power network?

Among the more recognizable names that did crop up on his sporting roster, however, were Casey Wasserman, the president of the Los Angeles Organizing Committee for the 2028 Olympic and Paralympic Games, and several fellow NFL owners alongside the 84-year-old Kraft, who apparently solicited advice from Epstein while facing a 2019 charge for soliciting prostitution. (He beat the rap.)

Another NFL owner in the lineup was Steve Tisch, the 76-year-old part owner of football’s New York Giants. As a Hollywood producer with credits like Forrest Gump and Risky Business, you might think he could have collected playmates on his own. In 2013, however, Epstein e-mailed Tisch, “I can invite the (Russian) …to meet if you like.” Tisch quickly replied, “Is she fun?”

A few weeks later, concerning a (name redacted) woman, Tisch asked, “Is my present in NYC?” After Epstein replied, “Yes,” Tisch asked, “Can I get my surprise to take me to lunch tomorrow?”

Epstein then wrote him: “I am happy to have you as a new but …shared interest friend.”

Trump, of course, was the sports figure — he owned a professional football team in the 1980s — whose mentions in the Epstein Files were most eagerly anticipated. His name, in fact, does come up thousands of times, although so far involving nothing of the existentially horrifying nature that his enemies had been waiting for and his allies presumably fearing.

Commander in Cheat

Trump’s standing in the sports world has never seemed particularly high. Even golfers tend to roll their eyes and agree with Rick Reilly, who wrote his book Commander in CheatHow Golf Explains Trump, about the way the president used to bully and whine his way across the greens.

Trump was spectacularly unsuccessful in his attempts to buy a National Football League team. In the 1980s, he tried to bulldoze his way into the sport as the owner of the New Jersey Generals of the new United States Football League (USFL), which played its games in the spring to avoid competition with the NFL.

Trump was a leader in the USFL’s lawsuit to force a merger with the NFL, which resulted in a pyrrhic victory — his side won the case, but the awarded damages came to $3.76 (and no, that is not a typo!). It sounded like a typical tale of Trump buffoonery.

Trump declared himself a fan of college football (an attempt to show disdain for the pros who had rejected him) and suffered further rejection from various championship teams who rebuffed his invitations to the White House.

Still, his administration clearly does what it wants when it comes to sports. In selling the war against Iran, for instance, it ran a series of video montages juxtaposing military bomb strikes and hard college and pro football hits. One such hit was a punishing block thrown in 2012 by Nebraska receiver Kenny Bell against a Wisconsin defensive back. Bell, a former NFL player as well, told the Washington Post that he was “disgusted” by the montage. “For that play to be associated with bombing human beings makes me sick,” he said. “I don’t want anything to do with images like that.”

Other athletes decried the usage on moral grounds, but there was no immediate complaint from the NFL itself, which is usually quick to protest any infringement of its copyrighted material. Was that supposed repository of our toughest athletes spooked by Trump? Was he, in fact, the Top Jock after all?

“This White House is vindictive and bullying,” commented Professor Rebecca Tushnet of Harvard Law School. “So, if you’re the NFL, why tempt its wrath?”

Why would they even want to? After all, aren’t they on the same Top Jock team?

As for the rest of us, we may just have to keep hitting back until we can write a new song, “Where Have You Gone, Donald Trump?”

And we will know just where.

This piece first appeared on TomDispatch.

Tuesday, March 24, 2026

Toronto unveils upgraded World Cup venue after fan scorn

Toronto (Canada) (AFP) – Toronto unveiled its upgraded World Cup stadium on Tuesday, insisting that temporary seating installed to meet FIFA capacity requirements would be safe for fans.


Issued on: 24/03/2026 - RFI


Workers are seen assembling temporary seating to expand capacity at BMO Field in Toronto, Canada ahead of the 2026 World Cup © Cole BURSTON / AFP

"The stands will be perfectly safe," said Nick Eaves, chief operating officer at Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment, which operates the Toronto stadium called BMO Field.

For the first time in World Cup history, the 2026 tournament is spread across three countries: the United States, Mexico and Canada.

The Toronto stadium is the smallest of the 16 venues and, with a regular capacity of about 28,000 seats, it needed a range of upgrades to meet World Cup hosting standards, including roughly 17,000 additional seats.

Earlier this month, images of the scaffolding that supports the temporary seating began spreading online. The reviews were not positive.

"Respectfully, you couldn't pay me to climb, stand or sit on that," read one fan post on X.

Eaves said Toronto partnered with a global leader in temporary seating called Arena Group and that the online furore over the bleachers had no basis in reality.

He said the temporary seating will also get a dress rehearsal on May 9, when Lionel Messi and Inter Miami come to BMO to play Toronto FC for a sold‑out MLS match.

Workers assembling temporary bleacher seating at BMO Field in Toronto © Cole BURSTON / AFP


"We plan on testing and using every piece of new infrastructure" at the Messi match, Eaves said.

FIFA takes over the venue on May 13, a month before the first World Cup match in Toronto.

But world football's governing body has conducted rigorous oversight of the stadium upgrades, said Sharon Bollenbach, the executive director of the World Cup hosting committee with the City of Toronto.

"They count every seat. They look at every seat, they assess the sightlines of every seat, so there's been multiple, multiple visits by FIFA approving the work that we've done," she told reporters.

'One of the best pitches'

Bollenbach said Toronto was not expected to overrun the CAN$380 million ($277 million) allocated to host its six World Cup matches.

But delivering the project on budget faced hurdles, including completing the stadium upgrade construction in what was a bitterly cold winter with heavy snowfall.

That also created some complications for the pitch, a blend of 95 percent natural grass with a five percent synthetic product, a mix recommended by FIFA, said Chris Shewfelt, vice president for business operations at Toronto FC.

The pitch was tarped through the coldest winter months, but the roots of the grass continued to grow thanks to a sub‑air system that heats the soil and grow lamps, he said.

"In late February, early March, when we took the tarp off the grass, it was green," Shewfelt said.

"We're confident we'll have one of the best pitches across the 16 host cities."

© 2026 AFP

Monday, March 16, 2026

Can Trump sell the MAGA crowd on soccer with the World Cup?
DW
16/03/2026

Donald Trump has mobilized around right-wing coded sports like MMA and wrestling, but his soccer World Cup push is a cultural clash.

While the days of soccer being a go-to conservative punching bag for being "socialist" or a "sign of the nation's moral decay" have largely subsided, right-leaning publications still regularly trot out arguments for why the "US doesn't care about soccer" or the sport is "unjust and un-American".

In recent years, the sport has also served as a lighting rod in American culture wars, with the US women's national team in particular landing in the crosshairs of Donald Trump and the MAGA (Make America Great Again) movement for its outspoken progressive players.

With the men's World Cup in the US, Canada and Mexico rapidly approaching and Donald Trump aggressively promoting the tournament and deepening his relationship with FIFA, the American president is facing one of his toughest sells yet: soccer to his supporters.
Trump's World Cup?

Despite weighing in on America's eternal 'soccer' vs. 'football' debate, most of Trump's soccer push is not directly related to the sport itself.

"While compared to other countries around the world, soccer is less political here," Jeffrey Kraus, political scientist at Wagner College, New York, told DW. "This upcoming World Cup has in many ways taken a political tone."

"There’s a sense that FIFA has embraced President Trump, which certainly associates the tournament with the president," he continued.

Trump's ever-intensifying relationship with FIFA President Gianni Infantino, and FIFA’s partnership with the president's new Board of Peace have helped make Trump the face of a continent-spanning World Cup.

For some conservatives, Trump's enthusiasm for soccer doesn't feel out of place given his approach to popular sports generally.

"He's always been a sports guy - just look at his connection to UFC and wrestling," Chris Vance, President of the UCLA Young Republicans, told DW. "He's always been about entertainment, he was in that business a long time, so it makes sense."

Evolving soccer culture

While American soccer isn't generally as overtly politicized as in many parts of Europe, its comparably young and immigrant-heavy fanbase tends to be more progressive.

Anti-ICE protests have been a major point of contention among Major League Soccer (MLS) fans and league officials since Trump's reelection.

Ryan Shirah, a member of the 'American Outlaws' US National Team supporters group who's attended over 120 men's and women's US matches, argues that though most fans avoid politics in the stands, they broadly lean in one direction.

"I won't shy away from the fact that there's a humanistic element there — I think most soccer fans in America tend to lean on the more progressive, human rights-focused side of things," Shirah told DW.

Shirah said political tensions in the supporters section were highest in the immediate wake of Trump’s first election, where there was concern Trump’s anti-Mexican campaign rhetoric would spill into the stands at a USA vs Mexico World Cup qualifier in Columbus, Ohio.

"We didn't know what was going to happen, if people would be trying to chant, 'build that wall'," Sirah explained. "It's something we didn't want to bring into our atmosphere and we kept out. Generally, we haven't really had an issue."

In 2022 in Qatar, USA and Iran fans were supportive of their teams
Image: Christophe Ena/AP/picture alliance

Soccer's continued growth means the political makeup of its American fans is likely to shift.

"Since the US hosted the 1994 World Cup, soccer has become a bigger part of American life," said political scientist Kraus. "Much of the population growth since the 90s has been through immigration, and many of the folks who come here brought their love of the 'beautiful game'."

Growing Republican support among Latinos in the 2024 election demonstrates that the political views of immigrants, many of whom are driving the sport's growth in the US, can evolve and potentially change US soccer culture in turn.

And while the arrival of Lionel Messi in Miami has brought wider attention to the sport, organizers are hoping the 2026 World Cup can further propel soccer into the American mainstream. As it gets bigger, soccer will increasingly appeal to conservative fans.

"I live on Staten Island, one of the most suburban and conservative boroughs in New York City. When I was younger, on Saturdays you'd drive around and the athletic fields would be filled with kids playing baseball. Now it's soccer," said Kraus. It is perhaps of note that Staten Island is the only NYC borough won by Donald Trump in 2024.

The next MAGA sporting sensation?

Vance, who notes he's a bit of an outlier among his peers due to his interest in soccer, is excited for the US to play World Cup matches in Los Angeles.

"It's cool to host it here. I think of it almost as a conservative sport because it's so community based, or at the very least not really as a politically-leaning sport," he said.

Organized supporters like Shirah tend not to dwell too much on potential political differences with fellow fans as long as they can maintain a welcoming atmosphere in the stadium.

"We haven't had a major tournament since the election, but why have that (offensive) nonsense into the stadium if we don't have to? So far, so good," he said.

"We don't care what you do or what podcasts you listen to after the 90 minutes. If you're passionate about the team and not using slurs or anything, that's fine. We all have walks of life, and I think that's what makes America great."

First, the US will have to have a successful run at the World Cup to make the most of a generational opportunity. If they can do that, existing supporters may well have to worry about the politics of new fans — a problem many of them likely wouldn't mind.

Edited by: Jonathan Harding

Sunday, March 15, 2026

 ZIONIST IMPERIALISM

Israel planning to invade southern Lebanon

Israel planning to invade southern Lebanon
Israel is preparing plans for a major ground offensive in southern Lebanon aimed at pushing Hezbollah north of the Litani River after a large-scale rocket attack on northern Israel escalated regional tensions. / bne IntelliNews
By bne IntelliNews March 15, 2026

Israel is preparing plans for a large-scale ground offensive into southern Lebanon aimed at pushing the Iran-backed militant group Hezbollah away from the border and dismantling its military infrastructure, according to US and Israeli officials cited by Axios and The Times of Israel.

The operation under discussion would seek to seize territory south of the Litani River, which runs across southern Lebanon and has long served as a strategic dividing line in previous conflicts between Israel and Hezbollah. Officials said the plan gained urgency after Hezbollah launched more than 200 rockets at northern Israel on March 12 in an attack that Israeli officials said was coordinated with Iranian missile strikes.

“We are going to do what we did in Gaza,” a senior Israeli official told Axios, referring to Israel’s campaign to destroy militant infrastructure. “The goal is to take over territory, push Hezbollah’s forces north and away from the border, and dismantle its military positions and weapons depots in the villages,” the official said.

The report comes as Israel has begun reinforcing its northern military command. The Israel Defence Forces said chief of staff Lieutenant General Eyal Zamir had ordered a “broad reinforcement” of troops in the Northern Command “as part of strengthening readiness for various offensive and defensive scenarios”.

According to the military, the deployment will include units from the standing army, including the 98th Division with two brigade-level combat teams and combat engineering battalions. Reserve forces from the 252nd Division are expected to deploy to Gaza to replace regular units being shifted north.

Israeli authorities have also urged thousands of civilians in parts of southern Lebanon to evacuate, signalling concern that hostilities could intensify in border areas where Hezbollah has built extensive networks of tunnels, weapons depots and fortified positions.

The prospect of a ground operation would revive memories of previous Israeli incursions into Lebanon. After the 1982 Israel-Lebanon war, Israel maintained a security zone in southern Lebanon for nearly two decades before withdrawing in 2000 following prolonged guerrilla warfare with Hezbollah and allied groups.

Under the ceasefire that followed fighting along the border after the October 7, 2023 Hamas attacks, Lebanon committed to ensuring Hezbollah forces withdrew north of the Litani River, though Israeli officials have repeatedly said the measure was not fully implemented.

Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem said the group was prepared for a prolonged confrontation. “We have prepared ourselves for a long confrontation, and God willing, they (Israelis) will be surprised on the battlefield,” Qassem said in a televised address on March 14.

Lebanon was drawn more directly into the regional conflict after Hezbollah launched attacks on Israel following US and Israeli strikes that killed Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, widening a war that has increasingly involved multiple Iranian-backed groups across the region.

A humanitarian crisis is unfolding in Lebanon with over 850,000 – one in seven of the population - displaced since the outbreak of war in the region two weeks ago and a year since the last conflict uprooted over a million Lebanese from their homes.

The conflict between Hezbollah and Israel reignited on March 2 after it fired rockets on Israel provoking a harsh counter reaction. Most Lebanese were hoping Hezbollah would not respond to the attack on Iran. The government is using Lebanon’s largest sports stadium as a makeshift shelter to house the increasing numbers without accommodation.

The Israeli army has killed 103 children, and wounded 326 more kids, in Lebanon in the past 11 days. Israel killed 773 people overall, and wounded 1,933, according to Lebanon’s Health Ministry.

Israel has invaded southern Lebanon on multiple occasions in the past:
 

1919: Chaim Weizmann: "the Litani was 'essential to the future of the Jewish national home'."

1941: Ben-Gurion & Moshe Dayan advocated Israeli occupation of southern Lebanon up to the Litani.

1948: During the war, Ben-Gurion thought the Litani should be Israel's northern border; Israel occupied Lebanese territory, withdrew to Ras al-Naqura line due to diplomatic pressure.

1950s: Prime Minister Moshe Sharett wrote in his diary that Moshe Dayan's plan for the control of the Litani River was to "'enter Lebanon … the territory south of the Litani will be annexed to Israel.'"

1978: the Israeli army invaded south Lebanon up to the Litani River. A UN resolution forced withdrawal back to the border.

1982: Israel re-invades Lebanon, occupies the territory south of the Litani River, besieges Beirut, slaughtering thousands of civilians. Facilitated Sabra and Shatila massacres

1982-2000: Israel occupies southern Lebanon south of the Litani River, giving rise to Hezbollah, founded in 1982 in response to the Israeli invasion and belligerent military occupation of Lebanon.

2006: Israel re-invaded Lebanon again, but suffered heavy losses m, failing to re-occupy it.

2024-present: On 1 October 2024, Israel invaded Southern Lebanon again, tried to occupy the south, but couldn't advance very far due to heavy resistance, so instead bombs & terrorizes the country on a daily basis since.