Showing posts sorted by date for query SWASTIKA. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query SWASTIKA. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Friday, May 01, 2026

Right-wing violence in Germany hits highest level since 2016

01.05.2026, dpa

Photo: Bernd Weißbrod/dpa

German police recorded the highest number of right-wing motivated violent offences last year since 2016, according to a government response to a question from the opposition Left Party.

The response, seen by dpa, showed that Germany's federal states had reported a total of 1,598 such offences for 2025 to the Federal Criminal Police Office (BKA) by the cut-off date of January 31, 2026.

In most cases, investigations were launched on suspicion of bodily harm or grievous bodily harm.

The previous year, the states recorded 1,488 right-wing motivated violent offences, while in 2023 police registered 1,270 violent offences with a right-wing background.

The figures for the previous year can still change because of late reports. This is partly because reports first have to be passed from the states to the BKA, but also because the political motivation behind an offence sometimes only becomes clear later.

Looking at all right-wing motivated offences recorded in 2025, there was a slight decline, from 42,788 to 42,544 offences.

Typical politically motivated offences include denigrating the state and its symbols, incitement to hatred and insults.

Violent offences include homicides, bodily harm, breach of the peace, dangerous interference with road traffic, deprivation of liberty and offences involving resistance to law enforcement officers.

Sunday, April 26, 2026

 Southern Poverty Law Center

‘Craven Attempt to Silence Dissent’: Trump DOJ Slammed for Indictment of Anti-Hate Group

“Another example of the dangerous, overreaching abuse of executive power so endemic in this authoritarian administration.”


FBI Director Kash Patel speaks alongside Acting US Attorney General Todd Blanche during a news conference on April 21, 2026 in Washington, DC.
(Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

Jake Johnson
Apr 22, 2026
COMMON DREAMS

The civil rights and progressive advocacy community is rallying to the defense of the Southern Poverty Law Center after President Donald Trump’s Justice Department indicted the organization on Tuesday on multiple counts of wire fraud and other charges, which the group has condemned as false and politically motivated.

The Justice Department, led by Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche—who previously served as Trump’s personal attorney—said Tuesday that a grand jury in Montgomery, Alabama returned an indictment charging SPLC with “11 counts of wire fraud, false statements to a federally insured bank, and conspiracy to commit concealment money laundering.” The Justice Department accused SPLC, which specializes in monitoring extremist groups and movements, of “funding” far-right white supremacist organizations such as the Ku Klux Klan by paying people to infiltrate them and gather information.

Bryan Fair, SPLC’s interim chief executive, said the Trump DOJ’s “false allegations” won’t “shake our resolve to fight for justice and ensure the promise of the civil rights movement becomes a reality for all.” Fair noted that SPLC no longer works with paid informants but emphasized that they “risked their lives to infiltrate and inform on the activities of our nation’s most radical and violent extremist groups.”

Allied civil rights organizations spoke out in defense of the SPLC and warned that the Trump administration’s legal assault on the group is part of a broader attack on those who oppose the far-right and work to protect democracy.

“What is happening to civil rights organizations right now is the most coordinated assault on our sector since COINTELPRO,” Maya Wiley, president and CEO of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights. “We are the people who train poll workers, run food banks, fight discrimination, protect the right to protest, and staff domestic violence hotlines. We are the ones who make sure that everyone can live, love, vote, work, study, travel and simply be themselves, free from discrimination. This administration views that as a threat to its power.”

“In order to have absolute power, it must dismantle our rights,” Wiley added. “And that’s why they’re coming after us.”

“We condemn this appalling move from a captured, weak-willed DOJ that is devoid of integrity and has lost sight of its mission under this administration.”

Lisa Gilbert, co-president of the consumer watchdog group Public Citizen, called the SPLC indictment “another example of the dangerous, overreaching abuse of executive power so endemic in this authoritarian administration.”

“This is a craven attempt to silence dissent by attacking a core civil rights organization focused on combating violent extremism,” said Gilbert. “We condemn this appalling move from a captured, weak-willed DOJ that is devoid of integrity and has lost sight of its mission under this administration. We stand in solidarity with SPLC.”

SPLC has repeatedly criticized Trump, members of his two administrations, people in his orbit, and extremist groups—such as the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers—that have supported the president’s efforts to subvert American democracy, including with violence on January 6, 2021.

“To be clear: Trump’s FBI is going after the Southern Poverty Law Center because they infiltrated and exposed the same dangerous right-wing extremist groups that many Trump allies are associated with,” activist Melanie D’Arrigo said in response to the indictment.

Anthony Romero, executive director of the ACLU, said in a statement that the Trump administration’s “continued weaponization of the Justice Department to target organizations speaking out against its agenda is anti-American behavior harkening back to the McCarthy era.”

“The Trump administration’s attack against the Southern Poverty Law Center is a direct threat to the values that make America great,” said Romero. “In this time of unprecedented peril for our democracy, we urge all Americans of good conscience to join us as we stand in support of the Southern Poverty Law Center.”

Even the right-wing underworld claims new DOJ indictment is nonsensical


Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche speaks next to Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director Kash Patel and U.S. President Donald Trump, at a press briefing at the White House, following a shooting incident during the annual White House Correspondents’ Association dinner, in Washington, D.C., U.S., April 25, 2026 REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst


April 26, 2026 
ALTERNET


More than friendly to fascists both abroad and at home, the Trump administration is now seeking to destroy the Southern Poverty Law Center -- historically one of the nation's most powerful and effective opponents of the Ku Klux Klan, American neo-Nazis and other white supremacist movements.

This was the latest in a long series of signals from the White House to the president's swastika-flying fans. It means that such groups need no longer fear a resolute federal response to their criminality.

On April 22, Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche and FBI Director Kash Patel announced -- at a blatantly political press event -- that the Justice Department has indicted the SPLC for "wire fraud, false statements, and conspiracy to commit money laundering." The indictment, described by Patel as "massive" and "sweeping," relies on the notion that the SPLC 's use of paid informants in violent white supremacist outfits such as the Klan and the neo-Nazi National Alliance and Atomwaffen somehow defrauded its donors.


Blanche and Patel went on to assert that those payments -- which over the years amounted to millions - had financed the continued existence of those groups, a claim echoed in right-wing media outlets. In the New York Post, for instance, a columnist wrote that by paying its confidential informants, the SPLC "kept relic organizations like the Ku Klux Klan on life support."

The alleged motive was to justify the SPLC's own continued existence and fundraising by maintaining a threat from fascist violence, which Republicans in Washington have persistently minimized or dismissed. Indeed, the Trump administration has hired and promoted any number of far-right extremists, especially since its return to power.


The absurdity of the indictment ought to be obvious to anyone -- including former federal prosecutor Blanche -- who knows how the FBI prosecutes organized crime, terrorism, narcotics smuggling or violent extremism, in nearly every case depending on paid informants. Over the past few decades, in fact, the FBI and the Justice Department have relied on information from SPLC and its informants to jail violent Klansmen and Nazis.

The indictment also charges that the SPLC "concealed" its identity behind false fronts when sending money to informants, following similar practices by the FBI and the Justice Department to avoid exposing their paid agents.

To suggest that the SPLC "supported" the activities of those criminal groups, as the DOJ indictment alleges, is precisely the same as saying that federal prosecutors and FBI agents were responsible for financing the Mafia, narcotics cartels and terrorism networks.


Under questioning from reporters, Blanche essentially admitted that the indictment's fundamental claim is baseless. Asked whether the indictment specifically alleged that the SPLC payments benefited the Klan, Atomwaffen or other extremist groups, Blanche admitted that it offered no such evidence. "To the extent that there's any link between that individual receiving the money and benefits to that organization," he said, "that's not in the indictment."

Not surprisingly, perhaps, former federal prosecutors who have gone after the Klan and other violent extremists were appalled by the government's attack on SPLC.

Doug Jones, who served as U.S. attorney in Alabama, described the indictment as "outrageous" and "pure political retribution" by President Donald Trump. Having taken down white supremacist gangs himself, Jones recalled how the SPLC "helped dismantle the Ku Klux Klan's operations in Alabama and beyond" in 1981, when its attorneys and investigators secured justice in a Mobile, Alabama, lynching incident.


There are dozens of similar cases in the SPLC files, including major victories against the United Klans of America, the Invisible Empire Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, the Imperial Klans of America, and the paramilitary White Patriot Party and the Aryan Nations.
It isn't only liberal lawyers who can see through the flimsy accusations in the DOJ indictment. In The Free Press, Bari Weiss' Trump-friendly online publication, conservative Yale law professor Jed Rubenfeld warns that "the Justice Department will have a hard time proving that the (SPLC's) use of informants amounts to fraud."

Many other right-wing commentators and organizations have welcomed the indictment as just desserts for an organization whose views they despise, particularly because the SPLC has defended Muslims, gays and trans people as well as Blacks and Jews. So much for freedom of speech, a value more likely to be upheld on the right when convenient and comforting to their own.


The most telling commentary on this disgraceful frameup comes not from liberals or conservatives but from the fascist underworld. Gleeful as they are, the fascists admit that the indictment is nonsensical and indeed view its legal falsification as evidence that Trump is truly on their side.

Curtis Yarvin, the authoritarian gadfly whose writings have influenced various Big Tech figures and others in the Trump circle, celebrated the indictment on X: "What's cool is that I don't really see a strong legal case that the SPLC shouldn't be able to run these kinds of wacky black ops. That means DOJ is prosecuting the SPLC just because it (kind of) can. If so this would be an unusual sign of 'finally getting it.'"


On the "revolutionary fascist" American Futurist Telegram channel -- whose authors include former members of the Atomwaffen neo-Nazi group, linked to at least five political murders -- the indictment won praise for the same sickening reason. They know that the SPLC, far from secretly propping up violent white nationalists, is their worst enemy.

"The SPLC was not funding racist groups to enable their racism -- they, in fact, were not funding racist groups at all," the American Futurist-linked TAF Private channel posted, according to Raw Story. "What they were doing was funding bad actors within groups, with the intention of destroying those groups from the inside."
The enemy of my enemy is my friend, as the old saying goes -- and for the Trump White House, the enemy of fascism is its enemy too.

Tuesday, April 07, 2026

BLACK FASCIST

Kanye West blocked from travelling to UK by government - Wireless Festival has been cancelled

Kanye West blocked from travelling to UK by government
Copyright AP Photo

By David Mouriquand
Published on 

Controversial American rapper Kanye 'Ye' West has been blocked from entering the UK to perform at the Wireless music festival after a mounting backlash over his planned summer headline slot. Now, the 2026 edition of the Wireless Festival has been axed.

The pressure was too strong...

Following the UK’s Wireless Festival being criticised over the booking of Kanye ‘Ye’ West, and growing backlash over the controversial rapper’s planned headline set this summer, the UK government has blocked the controversial rapper’s permission to travel to Blighty.

The Home Office confirmed the ban to the BBC; the government has discretion to ban foreign nationals from the UK if their presence is not considered "conducive to the public good".

Responding to the news, the Wireless Festival issued the following statement: "The Home Office has withdrawn YE's ETA, denying him entry into the United Kingdom. As a result, Wireless Festival is cancelled and refunds will be issued to all ticket holders."

It continued: "As with every Wireless Festival, multiple stakeholders were consulted in advance of booking YE and no concerns were highlighted at the time."

"Antisemitism in all its forms is abhorrent, and we recognise the real and personal impact these issues have had. As YE said today, he acknowledges that words alone are not enough, and in spite of this still hopes to be given the opportunity to begin a conversation with the Jewish community in the UK."

Upon hearing the news that West's entry into the UK had been denied, the Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA) had urged sponsors to continue boycotting the event, following the likes of Pepsi, Diageo, PayPal and Rockstar Energy all stepping away.

A spokesperson for Campaign Against Antisemitism said in a statement: "The Government has clearly made the right decision here. For once, when it said that antisemitism has no place in the UK, it backed up its words with action.”

"Someone who has boasted of making tens of millions of dollars from selling swastika t-shirts and who released a song called Heil Hitler just months ago clearly would not be conducive to the public good in the UK.”

The statement concluded: "Wireless Festival, in its desperate quest for profit, defended the invitation until the end. That is shameful, and its sponsors should continue to stay away."

No need to boycott, as the festival's 2026 edition is now no more...

Previously, Melvin Benn, the managing director of Festival Republic, which co-promotes Wireless alongside Live Nation, had issued a statement defending West, calling his past comments “abhorrent” but pleading for “forgiveness” and “giving people a second chance”.

West even made a statement, saying he had been "following the conversation around Wireless and want to address it directly".

"My only goal is to come to London and present a show of change, bringing unity, peace, and love through my music," he said, offering to meet members of the Jewish community in person "to listen". He added: "I know words aren't enough - I'll have to show change through my actions. If you're open, I'm here."

However, those comments weren’t enough and West will not be heading to London this summer.

Kanye West AP Photo

West’s anti-Semitic remarks began in 2022, when he made a series of offensive comments on social media which ended up getting him booted off both X and Instagram. The musician was dropped by his talent agency and fashion brands like Adidas and Balenciaga also distanced themselves from West

West went on to post a picture of KKK robesrescind his previous apology to the Jewish communitydeclare himself “a Nazi” and assert that he has“dominion over his wife”.

In February 2025, West started selling swastika t-shirts, and in May, he released a song titled ‘Heil Hitler’, which praised the Nazi leader. This led him to be stripped of a visa to enter Australia and faced with immediate arrest in Brazil.

West has since apologised for his actions and took out a full-page ad in the Wall Street Journal earlier this year in order to apologise for his past antisemitic comments, reflecting on a "four-month-long manic episode of psychotic, paranoid and impulsive behaviour" and saying that he “lost touch with reality.”

Still, many questioned the timing of his apology, considering the recent release of his new album ‘Bully’, and his past comments have led to various countries banning his performances.

The mayor of the southern city of Marseille, France's second-biggest city, recently stated he does not want West anywhere near his city.

Kanye West’s last UK performance was his Glastonbury headline set in 2015.


 

Kanye West backlash escalates in UK as festival organiser defends booking - West issues statement



By David Mouriquand
Published on 

Wireless Festival organiser has defended the booking of Kanye 'Ye' West for this summer’s headline slot, while more sponsors drop out of the festival. Questions remain over whether the controversial rapper will be able to enter the UK. West has now issued a statement of his own.

The Wireless Festival in the UK has come under huge pressure over the booking of Kanye ‘Ye’ West, and the backlash is intensifying.

The controversial American rapper was announced last week as the three-night headliner of this year’s festival in London’s Finsbury Park in July – despite the musician’s past anti-Semitic remarks.

The booking has prompted widespread criticism, including from Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who said it is “deeply concerning that Kanye West has been booked to perform at Wireless despite his previous anti-Semitic remarks and celebration of Nazism”.

His comments were echoed by various groups and politicians, who expressed further concern and indignation at the booking of West for the festival.

London mayor Sadiq Khan criticised the booking, stating: “We are clear that the past comments and actions of this artist are offensive and wrong, and are simply not reflective of London’s values”.

A series of festival sponsors have cut their ties with Wireless as a result, including main sponsor Pepsi and drinks giant Diageo.

Sajid Javid, the former Home Secretary and current chair of the Holocaust Memorial Day Trust, praised their action.

Now both PayPal and Rockstar Energy have distanced themselves from Wireless – with PayPal no longer allowing its branding to be used on promotional material for the festival and Rockstar Energy reportedly pulling out.

As the pressure mounts for the festival to take action, Melvin Benn, the managing director of Festival Republic, which co-promotes Wireless alongside Live Nation, has issued a statement defending the headliner.

“I am a deeply committed anti-fascist and have been all my adult life,” said Benn. “I lived on a kibbutz for many months in the 1970s that was attacked on October 7th, am pro Jew and the Jewish state, while being equally committed to a Palestinian state.”

He continued: “Having had a person in my life for the last 15 years who suffers from mental illness, I have witnessed many episodes of despicable behaviour that I have had to forgive and move on from. If I wasn’t before, I have become a person of forgiveness and hope in all aspects of my life, including work.

“What Ye has said in the past about Jews and Hitler is as abhorrent to me as it is to the Jewish community, the Prime Minister and others that have commented and – taking him at his word – to Ye now also.”

“Ye’s music is played on commercial radio stations in this country. It is available via live streams and downloads in this country without comment or vitriol from anyone and he has a legal right to come into the country and to perform in this country. He is intended to come in and perform. We are not giving him a platform to extol opinion of whatever nature, only to perform the songs that are currently played on the radio stations in our country and the streaming platforms in our country and listened to and enjoyed by millions.”

He concluded: “Forgiveness and giving people a second chance are becoming a lost virtue in this ever-increasing divisive world and I would ask people to reflect on their instant comments of disgust at the likelihood of him performing (as was mine) and offer some forgiveness and hope to him as I have decided to do.”

UPDATE: In a statement, West said he has been "following the conversation around Wireless and want to address it directly".

"My only goal is to come to London and present a show of change, bringing unity, peace, and love through my music," he said, offering to meet members of the Jewish community in person "to listen". He added: "I know words aren't enough - I'll have to show change through my actions. If you're open, I'm here."

West’s anti-Semitic remarks began in 2022, when he made a series of offensive comments on social media which ended up getting him booted off both X and Instagram. The musician was dropped by his talent agency and fashion brands like Adidas and Balenciaga also distanced themselves from West.

West went on to post a picture of KKK robesrescind his previous apology to the Jewish communitydeclare himself “a Nazi” and assert that he has“dominion over his wife”.

In February 2025, West started selling swastika t-shirts, and in May, he released a song titled ‘Heil Hitler’, which praised the Nazi leader. This led him to be stripped of a visa to enter Australia and faced with immediate arrest in Brazil.

West has since apologised for his actions and took out a full-page ad in the Wall Street Journal earlier this year in order to apologise for his past antisemitic comments, reflecting on a "four-month-long manic episode of psychotic, paranoid and impulsive behaviour" and saying that he “lost touch with reality.”

Still, many questioned the timing of his apology, considering the recent release of his new album ‘Bully’, and his past comments have led to various countries banning his performances. The most recent is France, as the mayor of the southern city of Marseille, France's second-biggest city, stated he does not want West anywhere near his city.

Kanye West and his partner Bianca Censori at the 67th annual Grammy Awards - Sunday 2 Feb. 2025
Kanye West and his partner Bianca Censori at the 67th annual Grammy Awards - Sunday 2 Feb. 2025 AP Photo

It remains to be seen whether West will be able to enter the UK, as his right to do so is reportedly under government review.

UK Ministers have the power to ban foreign nationals from entering the country if their presence is not considered “conducive to the public good”.

Kanye West’s last UK performance was his Glastonbury headline set in 2015.

Monday, April 06, 2026

 

Keir Starmer 'deeply concerned' by upcoming Kanye ‘Ye’ West UK gigs as sponsors pull out of festival

Keir Starmer 'deeply concerned' by upcoming Kanye ‘Ye’ West UK gigs as festival sponsors pull out
Copyright AP Photo

By David Mouriquand
Published on 

Kanye ‘Ye’ West, who has previously been criticised over his antisemitic remarks, will top the bill for all three nights of the upcoming Wireless Festival in the UK. The Prime Minister has expressed concerns over this booking, and several top tier sponsors are already backing out...

Following the release of his twelfth studio album ‘Bully’, American rapper and controversy magnet Kanye ‘Ye’ West has been booked to headline all three nights of the Wireless Festival in Finsbury Park this summer.

The trio of July dates have been described as a three-night journey through his “most iconic records”.

The dates are West’s first UK performance in more than a decade – as well as his first London festival headline set since he topped the bill at Wireless in 2014.

However, there’s already some pushback, as West’s presence in the UK is proving to be divisive.

Prime Minister Keir Starmer has criticised Wireless Festival for allowing Kanye West to headline, calling his booking “concerning”.

“It is deeply concerning that Kanye West has been booked to perform at Wireless despite his previous antisemitic remarks and celebration of Nazism,” he said. “Antisemitism in any form is abhorrent and must be confronted clearly and firmly wherever it appears.”

He added: “Everyone has a responsibility to ensure Britain is a place where Jewish people feel safe and secure.”

The move to have West headline this summer has also been criticised by various groups including the Jewish Leadership Council and Campaign Against Anti-Semitism. The former called the decision to book West “deeply irresponsible.”

London mayor Sadiq Khan also criticised the booking, stating: “We are clear that the past comments and actions of this artist are offensive and wrong, and are simply not reflective of London’s values”.

The comments Khan is referring to could fill several weighty tomes.

West’s anti-Semitic remarks began in 2022, when he made a series of offensive comments on social media which ended up getting him booted off both X and Instagram. The musician was dropped by his talent agency and fashion brands like Adidas and Balenciaga also distanced themselves from West.

West went on to post a picture of KKK robesrescind his previous apology to the Jewish communitydeclare himself “a Nazi” and assert that he has“dominion over his wife”.

In February 2025, West started selling swastika t-shirts, and in May, he released a song titled ‘Heil Hitler’, which praised the Nazi leader. This led him to be stripped of a visa to enter Australia and faced with immediate arrest in Brazil.

West has since apologised for his actions and took out a full-page ad in the Wall Street Journal earlier this year in order to apologise for his past antisemitic comments, reflecting on a "four-month-long manic episode of psychotic, paranoid and impulsive behaviour" and saying that he “lost touch with reality.”

Still, many questioned the timing of his apology, considering the release of ‘Bully’, and his past comments have led to various countries banning his performances. The most recent is France, as the mayor of the southern city of Marseille, France's second-biggest city, stated he does not want West anywhere near his city.

To make matters more uncertain for West’s upcoming UK performances, several festival sponsors have started to back out – including Wireless’ primary sponsor Pepsi. The festival had officially been known as “Pepsi MAX Presents Wireless,” as part of a partnership that had been in place since 2015.

A Pepsi spokesperson said: "Pepsi has decided to withdraw its sponsorship of Wireless Festival."

Diageo, owner of Johnnie Walker and Captain Morgan, said on Sunday evening it had also withdrawn.

A spokesperson said: "We have informed the organisers of our concerns and as it stands, Diageo will not sponsor the 2026 Wireless festival.

At the time of publication, the Wireless Festival website is still advertising West’s headline billing and continues to tout Pepsi’s sponsorship.

“Pepsi MAX presents Wireless returns to Finsbury Park on the 10-12 July 2026,” reads the text on the main page.

Sunday, March 22, 2026

 

Modern Day Israel: A Poisonous Concoction for Most Outsiders


Think of modern day Israel as a bowl filled with a mixture of ingredients, a few complementary, like salt and pepper. Other ingredients, however, like the intermingling of Zionism and Talmudic Judaism, while favorable to many family members who grew up among its ranks, it proves unpalatable for most outsiders. Mixed together, the concoction grows tentacles intertwined with the curse of Medusa, a vicious monster sporting writhing serpents in place of hair, fanged teeth and a face so hideous that the mere sight of her was sufficient to turn a man to stone.

Edward Said, in his Forward to Israel Shahak’s, book, Jewish History – Jewish Religion, said:

the difference between him and most other Israelis was that he made the connections between Zionism, Judaism, and repressive practices against ‘non-Jews’; and of course he drew the conclusions… unlike most others he does not allow the horrors of the Holocaust to manipulate the truth of what in the name of the Jewish people Israel has done to the Palestinians. For him, suffering is not the exclusive possession of one group of victims; it should instead be, but rarely is the basis for humanizing the victims, making it incumbent on them not to cause suffering of the kind that they suffered. [Shahak was a Holocaust victim and survivor himself]

In 1903, the British government offered 6,000 square miles of Uganda for the creation of an Israeli state. Actually several proposals were considered for the creation of a Jewish homeland located outside The Middle East. In the pre-Zionist era, Ararat City (U.S.) and Suriname, South America were considered, neither being chosen. In the 20th century, possible places taken under consideration were Madagascar, Tasmania, Australia and two locations in the USSR, Birobidzhan in Russia’s Far East near the border with China and Crimea but in the end the Zionists held out for Palestine.

The victory of Nazism ruled out assimilation and mixed marriages as an option for Jews when they were being forced to identify themselves as Jews in Nazi Germany, Dr. Joachim Prinz, a Zionist rabbi and a friend of Golda Meir, said in his book We Jews: “We are not unhappy about this.” Viewed as an actual fulfillment of Zionist’s desires, it provided for a seeming congenial atmosphere for the flowering of both the myths of the Aryan race and the Jewish race. He went on to say, “We want assimilation to be replaced by a new law: the declaration of belonging to the Jewish nation and Jewish race.” (Dr Joachim Prinz, Wir Juden, Berlin, 1934, p. 150-1), Shahak (p 71) said, “some zionist leaders in Germany welcomed Hitler’s rise to power, because they shared his belief in the primacy of ‘race’ and his hostility to the assimilation of Jews among ‘Aryans’.” (p 71)

The Zionists colluded (51 documents) with the Nazis whereby tens of thousands of Jews emigrated from Germany, immigrating to Palestine, setting the stage for future Israel, also setting the stage for 75 plus years of suffering of the Palestinian people.


A commemorative medal struck by Nazi Germany to mark its Zionist alliance, with a Star-of-David on one side and a Swastika on the obverse. The importance of the Nazi-Zionist pact for Israel’s establishment is difficult to overstate. According to a 1974 analysis in Jewish Frontier, between 1933 and 1939 over 60% of all the investment in Jewish Palestine came from Nazi Germany – The Transfer Agreement.

Jewish American analyst Ron Unz details facts about Zionist-Nazi cooperation in the Unz Review. He reveals in one short snippet an interesting piece of information about a former Israeli Prime Minster, Yitzhak Shamir.

during the late 1930s, Shamir and his small Zionist faction had become great admirers of the Italian Fascists and German Nazis, and after World War II broke out, they had made repeated attempts to contact Mussolini and the German leadership in 1940 and 1941, hoping to enlist in the Axis Powers as their Palestine affiliate, and undertake a campaign of attacks and espionage against the local British forces, then share in the political booty after Hitler’s inevitable triumph.

After learning about Shamir’s earlier activities, Unz offered up the following response:

… the idea of the sitting Prime Minister of the Jewish State having spent his early wartime years as an unrequited Nazi ally was certainly something that sticks in one’s mind, not quite conforming to the traditional narrative of that era which I had always accepted.

Most remarkably, the revelation of Shamir’s pro-Axis past seems to have had only a relatively minor impact upon his political standing within Israeli society. I would think that any American political figure found to have supported a military alliance with Nazi Germany during the Second World War would have had a very difficult time surviving the resulting political scandal, and the same would surely be true for politicians in Britain, France, or most other western nations. But although there was certainly some embarrassment in the Israeli press, especially after the shocking story reached the international headlines, apparently most Israelis took the whole matter in stride, and Shamir stayed in office for another year, then later served a second, much longer term as Prime Minister during 1986-1992. The Jews of Israel apparently regarded Nazi Germany quite differently than did most Americans, let alone most American Jews.

Zionist Forced Transfer & Expulsion of Palestinians from Palestine

Statement by David Ben-Gurion, founder of State of Israel and Israel’s first prime minister:

The compulsory transfer of Arabs from the valleys of the proposed Jewish state could give us something which we never had, even when we stood on our own feet during the days of the First and Second Temple [a Galilee free of Arab population].
– (Zichronot [Memoirs] Vol. 4, p. 297-99, 12 July 1937.)

“What Arab cannot do his math and understand that the immigration at the rate of 60,000 a year means a Jewish state in all of Palestine”
– (Letter to Moshe Shertok known as Moshe Sharett, Israel’s first Foreign Minister, Ben-Gurion and the Palestinian Arabs, p. 167-8, 24 July 1937.)

“The war will give us the land. The concepts of ‘ours’ and ‘not ours’ are peace concepts, only, and in war they lose their whole meaning.”
– (to Yosef Weitz. David Ben-Gurion, Yoman Hamilhamah [War Diary], vol.1, entry dated 7 February 1948, p. 210-11.)

When Israel came into existence in 1948 Jews owned about 6% of the land of Palestine.

Statement by Yosef Weitz: the head of the Israeli government’s official Transfer Committee of 1948

The complete evacuation of the country from its [Arab] inhabitants and handing it to the Jewish people is the answer.” – (after touring Jewish settlements in the Esdraelon Valley Ibid, entry dated 20 March 1941, p. 1127.)

I made a summary of a list of the Arab villages, which in my opinion must be cleared out in order to complete Jewish regions. I also made a summary of the places that have land disputes and must be settled by military means.” – (Ibid., diary entry, 18 April 1948, p. 2358.)

The Utopia of the “Jewish ideology” adopted by the State of Israel is a land which is wholly ‘redeemed’ and none of it is owned or worked by non-Jews. Walter Laquer, in his book, History of Zionism, wrote the following: “A.D. Gordon, a devoted Zionist and his friends wanted everybody else to just go away and leave the land to be ‘redeemed’ by Jews.”

Karl Popper in The Open Society and Its Enemies, “There are two choices which face Israeli-Jewish society, It can become a fully closed and warlike ghetto, a Jewish Sparta, supported by the labour of Arab helots, kept in existence by its influence on the US political establishment and by threats to use its nuclear power.”

The Israel of today was born out of violence, starting with Freedom-Fighting Terrorist attacks against the British in Palestine. Following that, with a little help from the British, the theft and legal chicanery allowed the land to be misappropriated and given to another. Collectively givers gave, some out of greed, making out like a bandit; others felt comfortable giving away someone else’s land out of a perceived guilt. No matter the real or feigned motivation of the givers from far off places, the injured party, told to smile, smile, even though he would end up with only half of what had been his land and before that his ancestor’s ancestors land, the ancient pre-Israelite Canaanite’s. As it turned out, he ended up with little more than a pig in a poke. Most of the remaining half of his land was also purloined, even though now for three quarters of a century and counting, the Victim has been portrayed the Victimizer.

Jimmy R. Coleman is a former President of Garon Inc, a computer consulting company, but his real work started after he began his quest to find an answer to a rather simple question - “Why is it seemingly impossible to have peace in the Middle East?” Twenty plus years have gone by – the answer proving more difficult and elusive than the question. His research has taken him to the four corners of the globe, spanning centuries, covering the rise and fall of empires, cultures and religions. He has relied on some of the best experts in their respective areas, historians, theologians, political and military mindsets, and radical thinkers from the left and right, from Zionist, Jihadist and proponents of End Times eschatology, a journey that has helped frame his thinking, not as an expert who sees the trees, but as someone with a more generalist viewpoint of the forest. Read other articles by Jimmy.