Showing posts sorted by date for query UBER. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query UBER. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Sunday, December 14, 2025

What happens when you let women live alone? Pakistan needs to find out

Pakistan’s economic future grows stronger when women have the freedom to live, and work, on their own terms.

Published December 13, 2025 
PRISM/DAWN


Pakistan’s prolonged economic downturn is not driven by policy failures alone — it is also fuelled by the systematic underutilisation of its most capable women. Cultural norms that restrict women’s mobility, police their autonomy, and dictate their living arrangements, have become economic barriers, keeping productivity low and growth stagnant.

Pakistan could unlock this economic potential by confronting one of its most rigid social boundaries: women’s freedom to live independently in urban centres.

This article makes a case for a segment already positioned to contribute: urban, educated, skilled, and financially capable women, while recognising that many working-class women also live alone out of necessity or opportunity. Their struggles differ in context but not in significance, facing even harsher structural obstacles. Their participation in the economy is equally critical.

If accelerating growth, reducing brain drain, and closing gender gaps are national priorities, then enabling safe, viable independent living for women in major cities must finally be treated as an economic imperative.
The cost of excluding women

Pakistan’s female labour participation rate sits at a concerning 22.6 per cent for women aged between 15 and 64, which is significantly lower than the world average of 52.6pc, and even lower than the South Asian average of 25.2pc. According to the World Bank, a 10pc increase in female labour participation could increase Pakistan’s GDP growth by 1.5pc annually.

Countries with similar cultural foundations have already demonstrated this. Bangladesh leveraged female-intensive industries to improve GDP and reduce poverty levels. Saudi Arabia, after easing restrictions on women’s mobility and employment, saw an increase in billions to their economy within years. Vietnam attributed significant portions of its growth to educated women entering productive sectors at scale.

In Pakistan, however, even educated women frequently choose to opt out of the workforce or exit early. The reasons being predictable: restricted mobility, lack of safe transport, hostile work environments, and most crucially, a cultural expectation that they must live with their family until marriage, regardless of their professional needs.

“Being brought up in Pakistan, I was always told that I will go from my mother’s house to my husband’s house. The only interim freedom you get is if you go abroad for university,” reflected Elsa Sajjad, who lives with her sister in an apartment in Karachi. “I didn’t go abroad, but those who do, they get a taste of freedom and then it’s snatched back.”

While the decision to migrate abroad for better opportunities is understandable, the loss of these women — artists, academics, designers, lawyers, engineers, doctors — inflicts a drain on human capital Pakistan can no longer afford. Remittances soften the blow, but they do not compensate for the long-term erosion of youthful innovation, research capacity, and domestic talent pipelines.

If women had the option to live independently in city centres, closer to workplaces, training hubs, and universities, they would be less enticed to build their futures abroad.
Benefits of living alone

Ample evidence from across the world suggests that when educated women have control over their time, mobility, and finances, they are more likely to invest in skills development, career advancement, and entrepreneurship. Independent living for women in Pakistan, for those who can afford it, directly supports these outcomes.

“It made me grow up a lot faster than my friends. You’re working, you’re also paying your own electricity and gas bills, and you also have to keep savings aside in case of medical emergencies,” Sajjad pointed out.

Women in joint households shoulder disproportionate unpaid labour. Studies show Pakistani women spend up to 10 times more hours on domestic responsibilities than men. Living independently would allow women to reallocate this time toward networking, internships, freelance work, and degrees and certifications.

“I started my own company, which I could do because of the peace of mind I have. I don’t have to worry about silly things like household tiffs,” added Sajjad.

Women living alone in urban centres can avoid long commutes, unsafe travel, or family-imposed curfews that hinder employment. Living near business districts and transit hubs not only reduces transport costs and safety risks, but also increases workforce reliability, a crucial factor in gaining economic efficiency.

When educated daughters support themselves financially, families experience higher household income, reduced economic burden on parents, greater investment in the education of their younger siblings, and improved social mobility. Independent living also disrupts intergenerational poverty traps, especially for families who struggle to support adult daughters indefinitely.

“Not only am I supporting myself financially, but I can also support my mother,” Sajjad noted.

A rise in independent female tenants would expand rental markets, women-only hostels, co-living spaces, and local services such as laundries, transport, food, and security. This microeconomic ripple will strengthen the service sector, which is already Pakistan’s largest contributor to GDP.

Many women leave Pakistan not because they lack opportunity but because they lack agency over their lives. Facilitating independent living will keep human capital at home.

Living alone also compels women to confront the cycle of fear they have long been conditioned to stay within, ultimately making them more resilient and confident as they navigate the realities of household duties, maintenance issues, tenant rights, and even bribe-hungry police officers who try to take advantage of women driving alone.

“As a woman living alone in Pakistan, the law doesn’t always protect you,” Sajjad emphasised. “It pushed me to do things many women might not consider — like learning the basic laws every Pakistani woman should know. I studied workplace regulations, sexual harassment laws, and driving rules. There have been times when police tried to intimidate me, but now I know my rights and can stand my ground.”
The barriers: Real, serious, and solvable

A meaningful conversation around women’s independence and autonomy must acknowledge the barriers they face in attempting to live alone in Pakistan’s major cities. The most immediate challenge is financial. Even for educated, urban professionals, the cost of rent, utilities, transport, and basic living expenses can be prohibitive without the shared resource of a family household.

“Even the reason I have roommates is economic. I can’t afford rent by myself,” Yusra Amjad remarked, who rents an apartment in Islamabad to be closer to her place of employment.

The economic burden is compounded by discriminatory practices in the housing market, where landlords frequently refuse to rent to single women, demand the involvement of a male guardian, or impose intrusive questioning about marital status and daily activities — requirements less frequently applicable to male tenants.

It is also unconventional for unmarried men in Pakistan to live apart from their families, but the social implications based on gender vary greatly: women are often labelled as dishonourable and shameful, while men are praised as responsible and ambitious for prioritising their careers.

Safety remains an even more pressing concern. In many neighbourhoods across Karachi, Lahore, Islamabad, and other major cities, urban design offers little consideration for women’s security. Street harassment, break-ins, and the constant threat of gender-based violence dictate where women feel safe to live.

Even when a woman does find suitable housing, navigating the city independently brings its own set of risks. Public transport is often unreliable and unsafe, especially after dark, and ride-hailing services, while widely used, are not immune to harassment or predatory behaviour.

“I would call Careems and they were very unreliable. Some of the cars were very sketchy; I would get in and hope they wouldn’t break down,” recalled Maha Shahid, who once lived alone in her grandmother’s house in Karachi. “I would call them at the end of the street, never to my gate, because you never know who you’d get. I took little precautions like that, and I would always try to get out of the office before dark.”

In most cities, for those without a car, ride sharing is the only option. Trains, buses, and other forms of transport are inaccessible and widely unavailable, especially for women. For example, in Islamabad, a metro system has recently been established, but the stations are situated sparsely, and reaching them is another challenge.

“How am I getting to the metro? Am I calling an Uber to the metro? In New York you can walk to the bus. But here it becomes kind of counterintuitive,” said Amjad.

These constraints make late work hours, night classes, internships, and networking events far less unobtainable to women who rely on safe and reliable mobility to advance their careers.

Social scrutiny adds another layer of deterrence. Neighbours, building guards, and even extended family often view a woman living alone as a challenge to cultural norms, subjecting her to suspicion and moral policing. This informal yet pervasive surveillance fosters a hostile environment, deterring women who have the financial means and professional need to live independently. In an already conservative society, the perceived “impropriety” of a single woman managing her own home can translate into daily stress, reputational risk, and familial pressure to abandon the arrangement altogether.

“Women living alone are much more vulnerable in a country like ours. People are more likely to make judgements about their character,” relayed Amjad.

Yet, crucially, none of these barriers are insurmountable. They are symptoms of structural gaps — unregulated rental markets, insufficient women’s housing, inadequate urban planning, and a lack of gender-conscious transport policies — that can be addressed through both public reforms and private-sector innovation. Other countries with comparable cultural norms have expanded women-only hostels, implemented legal protections for single female tenants, strengthened public transport systems, and introduced safe co-living spaces that blend affordability with security. Pakistan can do the same. The obstacles are real, but so are the solutions.
Reframing the cultural conversation

Independent living for women in Pakistan is still seen as a radical challenge to cultural norms, but viewing it solely as a moral or social issue ignores its broader economic significance.

It is crucial to separate religious doctrine from cultural practice: Islam grants women the right to own property, enter contracts, manage finances, and make independent decisions about their livelihoods. The unease around women living alone, then, is not rooted in faith, but in inherited social norms that no longer align with the country’s economic realities.

At a time when Pakistan is grappling with shrinking productivity, declining competitiveness, and an accelerating brain drain, maintaining restrictive norms around women’s autonomy imposes a measurable financial cost. The issue is not whether tradition should be discarded, but whether our economic future can withstand the continued exclusion of half the population from fully participating in public and professional life.

“To me it’s not about feelings but about rationality. Often, I just wouldn’t understand the why. The why has to make sense to me. If the why is just a feeling you have, to me that’s not rational so I can’t just fall into line with what my mother says,” said Shahid, reflecting on the familial backlash she faced when deciding to live alone.

While this analysis primarily examines the economic case for women’s independent living, it is important to acknowledge that many women have no choice but to live alone due to unstable or controlling households, domestic abuse, divorce, or broader safety concerns
Let the women live

Pakistan still has a long road ahead before its cities are truly safe for women to live, work, and move through without fear or scrutiny. It also has a long way to go before women’s right to choose how they live is seen as acceptable, let alone normal.

In a country so deeply entrenched in culture, tradition, and religious routine, a break from conventions, especially by women, is often considered radical or defiant. Yet acknowledging the economic potential of independent living is a critical step toward unlocking the talent that already exists within our female population.

For the segment of women who are financially capable and professionally ambitious, living alone is a decision grounded in necessity, efficiency, and ambition — qualities any society striving for progress should value rather than resist.

“The two jobs that I had in Pakistan really set me up for success. I moved back to New England and got a six-figure salary job without even networking. My work experience in Pakistan really shaped me,” Shahid explained.

Understanding the benefits of female self-determination and highlighting stories of successful independent women can help normalise these choices. The journey is not easy, but the freedom and mobility it brings make it worthwhile. Challenging tradition is rarely comfortable, but clinging to the status quo no longer serves the country.

If Pakistan hopes to rebuild its economy, retain is skilled professionals, and participate competitively in a global landscape, it must allow its most capable women the freedom to structure their lives in ways that support their productivity.

Header image: The photo is generated through Canva AI.


The author is an independent writer based in Brooklyn, New York. With a background in international relations and public policy, she currently works as a researcher at a law and policy think tank aimed at democracy reform in the US.

Saturday, December 13, 2025

Price of a bot army revealed across hundreds of online platforms worldwide – from TikTok to Amazon




University of Cambridge
View of the COTSI tool on phone and tablet 

image: 

The Cambridge Online Trust and Safety Index (COTSI) displayed on a smartphone and tablet device. 

view more 

Credit: Anton Dek/Jon Roozenbeek



  • First global index tracking real-time prices for verifying fake accounts on 500+ online platforms in every country launched by Cambridge University.
     
  • The US, UK and Russia rank among the cheapest countries for buying fake account verification, while Japan and Australia are among the most expensive.
     
  • Meta, Shopify, X, Instagram, TikTok, LinkedIn and Amazon all among platforms with the cheapest fake account verifications.
     
  • Fake account verification prices on Telegram and WhatsApp surge ahead of national elections around the world, suggesting “influence operations”.


A new site that tracks the daily fluctuating costs behind building a bot army on over 500 social media and commercial platforms – from TikTok to Amazon and Spotify – in every nation on the planet is launched today by the University of Cambridge.

For the first time, the Cambridge Online Trust and Safety Index (COTSI) allows the global community to monitor real-time market data for the “online manipulation economy”: the SIM farms that mass-produce fake accounts for scammers and social bots.  

These markets openly sell SMS message verifications for fake profiles across hundreds of sites, providing a service for “inauthentic activity” ranging from vanity metrics boosts and rage-bait accounts to coordinated influence campaigns.

A new analysis using twelve months of COTSI data, published in the journal Science, shows that verifying fake accounts for use in the US and UK is almost as cheap as in Russia, while Japan and Australia have high prices due to SIM costs and photo ID rules.  

The average price of SMS verification for an online platform during the year-long study period running to July 2025 was $4.93 in Japan and $3.24 in Australia, yet just a fraction of that in the US ($0.26), UK ($0.10) and Russia ($0.08).*

The research also reveals that prices for fake accounts on Telegram and WhatsApp appear to spike in countries about to have national elections, suggesting a surge in demand due to “influence operations”.

The COTSI team, based in Cambridge’s Social Decision-Making Lab, includes experts in misinformation and cryptocurrency. They argue that SIM card regulation could help “disincentivise” online manipulation, and say their tool can be used to test policy interventions the world over.

The team suggest that platforms should add labels showing an account’s country of origin for transparency, as recently done on X, but also point out such measures can be circumvented – a service provided by many vendors in the study.

“We find a thriving underground market through which inauthentic content, artificial popularity, and political influence campaigns are readily and openly for sale,” said Dr Jon Roozenbeek, study co-lead and senior author from the University of Cambridge.

“Bots can be used to generate online attention for selling a product, a celebrity, a political candidate, or an idea. This can be done by simulating grassroots support online, or generating controversy to harvest clicks and game the algorithms.”

“All this activity requires fake accounts, and each one starts with a phone number and the SIM hardware to support it. That dependency creates a choke point we can target to gauge the hidden economics of online manipulation.”

Co-lead author Anton Dek, a researcher at the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance, said: “Misinformation is subject to disagreement across the political spectrum. Whatever the nature of inauthentic online activity, much of it is funnelled through this manipulation market, so we can simply follow the money.”  

Murky global market

To register a new account, online platforms require SMS (Short Message Service) verification: a text message containing a code sent to a valid phone number. This is intended to confirm a human is setting it up.  

Over the last decade, a murky global marketplace has emerged with the infrastructure to bypass this security protocol, and automatically generate and sell fake accounts in bulk.

Companies claiming to offer privacy solutions operate “farms” of thousands of SIM cards and SIM banks – both real and virtual – to provide SMS verifications and re-route web traffic though mobile networks to disguise its origin.

Fake accounts bought from this “transnational grey market” of informal businesses, often based in jurisdictions with little legal oversight, are central to online scams.

This market is also behind many malicious bot campaigns now dominating propaganda and PR dark arts, according to Cambridge researchers. “A sophisticated bot can run an influence campaign through hundreds of fake accounts,” said Roozenbeek.

“Generative AI means that bots can now adapt messages to appear more human and even tailor them to relate to other accounts. Bot armies are getting more persuasive and harder to spot.” For example, a study last year uncovered a botnet of 1,140 accounts on X using generative AI to run automated conversations.

Fake account index

The team built COTSI with opensource data pulled from some of the world’s biggest fake account suppliers. Researchers identified seventeen vendors and sorted by traffic to focus on the top ten. Four of these are used at any one time to construct the global price index, with others kept in reserve.

Importantly, COTSI monitors not just prices but also the available “stock” of fake accounts listed by each vendor in every country for hundreds of platforms.

These include all social media channels, as well as cash, dating and gaming apps, cryptocurrency exchanges and sharing economy sites such as AirBnB, music and video streaming services, ride-hailing apps such as Uber, and accounts for major brands such as Nike and McDonald’s.

“One SIM card can be used for hundreds of different platforms,” said Dek. “Vendors recoup SIM costs by selling high-demand verifications for apps like Facebook and Telegram, then profit from the long tail of other platforms.”

Additional analyses show global stocks of fake accounts are highest for platforms such as X, Uber, Discord, Amazon, Tinder and gaming platform Steam, while vendors keep millions of verifications available for the UK and US, along with Brazil and Canada.**

Meta, Grindr, and Shopify rank among platforms with the cheapest fake accounts for sale, at a global average of $0.08 per verification. This is followed by X and Instagram at an average of $0.10 per account, TikTok and LinkedIn at $0.11, and Amazon at $0.12.

The researchers tested the market themselves, with mixed results. Attempting to verify fake US Facebook accounts only worked 21% of the time with one big provider, but over 90% with another. Much of this difference comes down to virtual versus physical SIMs.***

“Fingerprinting by some platforms can mean IP addresses get banned if registration fails,” said Dek. “High-quality verifications involve a physical SIM, requiring huge banks of phones. Nations in which SIM cards are more expensive have higher prices for fake accounts. This is likely to suppress rates of malicious online activity.”

Pre-election prices

To investigate if political influence operations can be seen in these markets, the team analysed price and availability of SMS verifications for eight major social media platforms in the 30 days leading up to 61 national elections held around the world between summer 2024 and the following summer.****

They found that fake account prices shot up for direct messaging apps Telegram and WhatsApp during election run-ups the world over, likely driven by demand. An account on Telegram increased in price by an average of 12%, and by 15% on WhatsApp.

Accounts on these apps are tied to visible phone numbers, making it easy to see the country of origin. As such, those behind influence operations must register fake accounts locally, say researchers, increasing demand for SMS verifications in targeted nations.

However, on social media platforms like Facebook or Instagram, where no link between price and elections was found, fake accounts can be registered in one country and used in another. They also have greater reach which keeps demand high.

“A fake Facebook account registered in Russia can post about the US elections and most users will be none the wiser. This isn’t true of apps like Telegram and WhatsApp,” said Roozenbeek.

“Telegram is widely used for influence operations, particularly by state actors such as Russia, who invested heavily in information warfare on the channel.” WhatsApp and Telegram are among platforms with consistently expensive fake accounts, averaging $1.02 and $0.89 respectively.

‘Shadow economy’

The manipulation market’s big players have major customer bases in China and the Russian Federation, say the research team, who point out that Russian and Chinese payment systems are often used, and the grammar on many sites suggests Russian authorship. These vendors sell accounts registered in countries around the world.*****

“It is hard to see state-level political actors at work, as they often rely on closed-loop infrastructure. However, we suspect some of this is still outsourced to smaller players in the manipulation market,” said Dek.

Small vendors resell and broker existing accounts, or manually create and “farm” accounts. The larger players will provide a one-stop shop and offer bulk order services for follower numbers or fake accounts, and even have customer support.

2022 study co-authored by Dek showed that around ten Euros on average (just over ten US dollars) can buy some 90,000 fake views or 200 fake comments for a typical social media post.

“The COTSI index shines a light on the shadow economy of online manipulation by turning a hidden market into measurable data,” added co-author of the new Science paper Prof Sander van der Linden. “Understanding the cost of online manipulation is the first step to dismantling the business model behind misinformation.”

 

Notes:

*The data used in the study published in Science, as well as the additional analyses, was collected between 25 July 2024 and 27 July 2025.

** In April 2025, the UK became the first country in Europe to pass legislation making SIM farms illegal. Researchers say that COTSI can be used to track the effects of this law once it is implemented.

*** Lead author Anton Dek explains: “By virtual SIM, we mean virtual phone numbers typically provided by Communications Platform as a Service (CPaaS) or Internet-of-Things connectivity providers.”

“These services make it easy to purchase thousands of numbers for business purposes. Such numbers are usually inexpensive per unit, but they often carry metadata indicating that they belong to a CPaaS provider, and many platforms have learned to block verifications coming from them. On the other hand, when a physical SIM card (or eSIM) from a conventional carrier is used, it is much harder to distinguish from a normal consumer’s number.”

**** The platforms used were Google/YouTube/Gmail; Facebook; Instagram; Twitter/X; WhatsApp; TikTok; LinkedIn; Telegram.

***** A recent law passed by the Russian Federation banned third-party account registrations, which saw vendors suspend SMS verification registered in Russia alone as of September 2025. However, this has not stopped vendors operating from Russia offering services linked to other nations.

Friday, December 12, 2025

 

Uber Pioneers First Fully Electric Zero-Emissions Ferry in London

electric ferry London
Orbit Clipper is London's first fully electric ferry (Uber Boat by Thames Clipper)

Published Dec 12, 2025 8:22 PM by The Maritime Executive


Ferry transport in London is entering a new phase, focusing on sustainability following the launch of a zero-emission vessel. The boat is being promoted as transforming the experience of passengers travelling along the Thames.

Four years after committing to introducing high-speed and eco-friendly vessels to operate on the Thames, Uber Boat by Thames Clippers is launching Orbit Clipper, the UK’s first fully electric zero-emissions ferry. On December 5, the new vessel completed its first passenger trip on the Thames, ushering in what is being described as a new era for sustainable transport in London.

Uber Boat by Thames Clippers reckons that the Orbit Clipper is a groundbreaking vessel in many aspects. The 150-passenger ferry with capacity for 100 bicycles features a roll-on/roll-off design that enables automated docking on both sides owing to its double-ended, self-docking, auto-mooring features. The vessel will operate between London’s Canary Wharf on the north side of the Thames and Rotherhithe on the south, offering an efficient and eco-friendly service for cross-river transport.

Built by UK’s Wight Shipyard Co, Orbit Clipper was partly funded by the UK government through the Department for Transport and Innovate UK. The 25-meter (82-foot) vessel with a maximum speed of 12 knots forms a major component of Uber Boat by Thames Clippers drive towards sustainable transport in London.

In recent years, the operator has added three hybrid high-speed vessels to its main fleet of River Buses, each cutting emissions by up to 90 percent and contributing to its ambitious target of reducing carbon emissions by 50 percent by 2035 and achieving net-zero by 2050. The boats operate on battery power while in Central London and recharge while using biofueled power on the rest of their journey.

“The launch of Orbit Clipper is a significant milestone for sustainable transport in London. As the UK’s first all-electric, zero-emissions vessel, it represents our commitment to reducing the city’s carbon footprint while continuing to provide reliable and efficient river transport,” said Sean Collins, Uber Boat by Thames Clippers CEO.

The new vessel is expected to replace the current cross-river ferry service, continuing to serve the growing number of passengers. Estimates indicate the vessel will, on average, ferry more than 20,000 passengers daily.

In operation for over 25 years, Uber Boat by Thames Clippers has spearheaded innovations in the marine sector, consistently supporting the Thames' role in London's sustainable transport future. As part of its mission, the company has also been exploring advanced fuel options, including compressed hydrogen gas, liquid hydrogen, and methanol.



Japan Licenses Its First Autonomous Navigation Ro-Pax Ferry

ferry equipped for autonomous navigation
The 500 passenger Ro-Pax ferry will start autonomous navigation on Japan's Iland Sea (Nippon Foundation)

Published Dec 10, 2025 3:47 PM by The Maritime Executive


Japan is set to launch service aboard its first autonomous navigation ferry. The vessel Olympia Dream Seto recently completed the licensing process and will start sailing with the autonomous system on Thursday, December 11, as part of an ongoing government-sponsored project to advance autonomous navigation technology.

The Nippon Foundation hosted a demonstration of the autonomous system on Wednesday, highlighting it as a major milestone in the development of the technology. Reporters said the 60-meter (197-foot) ferry “gently pulled away from the pier and proceeded through calm waters. It also showed its ability to detect a ship ahead and reroute,” reported Kyodo News.

The nearly 1,000 gross ton ferry, which was built in 2019, is the first vessel successfully completed by the MEGURI 2040 project, which was launched in 2020. The ferry runs an approximate 70-minute route between Shin-Okayama Port and Shodoshima's Tonosho Port on the small islands off the coast of Japan. The ferry crosses the Seto Inland Sea and has a capacity for up to 500 passengers and 60 cars, or 10 buses. It operates at a speed of 13 knots with a crew of 10.

The MEGURI project was launched to advance autonomous navigation to the commercial stage. The Foundation highlights that it will help to reduce accidents caused by human error and will also address the growing shortage of seafarers. The project’s set a goal of achieving 50 percent unmanned operations of domestic ships by 2040.

The project conducted demonstration testing between January and March 2022. This included sailing in Tokyo Bay, which was designated as a congested waterway for the tests, with the Foundation highlighting the high vessel traffic in the region. It also completed a long-distance demonstration sailing approximately 750 km (over 460 miles).

Japan’s Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism established a study group in 2024 to consider the safety standards and inspection methods for autonomous shipping. The results were released in June 2025, setting the way for the Olympia Dream Seto to proceed.

The vessel’s systems were required to undergo an inspection before it was installed. This was completed in July and earned the vessel the “early-stage autonomous ship” designation. The second phase was completed on December 5, after the vessel demonstrated autonomous operations, and it received its certificate.

The ferry’s operator, Ryobi Ferry Company, says it will start using the system as the crew becomes more familiar with its operations. 

At the same time, the MEGURI project is moving forward with additional vessels. The containership Mikage (749 gross tons) was also used in the first stage demonstrations and is being prepared for certification. In addition, the RoRo ship Hokuren Maru No. 2 is being prepared for demonstration voyages in areas where it could encounter both congestion with fishing boats and fog. Additionally, the newly-built domestic containership Genbu was built anticipating unnamed operations. These demonstrations are scheduled to be completed by April 2026.
 


Thursday, December 11, 2025

White House caught flat-footed when asked how billionaire Trump can tell average Americans to limit kids’ Christmas gifts



Andrew Feinberg
Thu, December 11, 2025
THE INDEPENDENT 


With an estimated net worth between $5 billion and $7 billion and a penchant for coating every surface in the White House with what he claims to be 18-karat gold leaf paint, President Donald Trump isn’t exactly an expert on personal cost-cutting.

But after the uber-wealthy ex-real estate developer claimed that record-high toy prices caused by his tariffs are just fine because young girls “don’t need 37 dolls” and can make do with “two or three” instead, his official spokesperson was left scrambling when asked to defend the eyebrow-raising remarks.

Asked about Trump’s claim that Americans can “give up certain products” and limit toy purchases because tariffs have caused prices to go upon the 80 percent of toys on the U.S. market that are imported from China, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt first told reporters that the president’s comments were meant as an exhortation to buy more expensive American-made ones instead.

“Maybe you'll pay $1 or two more, but you will get better quality, and you'll be supporting your fellow Americans by buying American and that's what the President was saying,” she said.

But when The Independent pressed her on whether it is appropriate for one of the wealthiest men in the country to be lecturing cash-strapped parents on how many dolls their sons or daughters need to own, Leavitt irately pivoted to recasting Trump’s wealth as a positive while ignoring the substance of the question.


White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt speaks during a press briefing at the White House, Thursday, Dec. 11, 2025, in Washington (AP)

“Do you think the people in that room in Pennsylvania who the President was speaking to don't know the President's a billionaire? I think that's a very well established fact,” she said.

Leavitt continued her monologue by claiming that Trump’s status as a billionaire was part and parcel of why voters chose to return him to the White House in last year’s election over then-vice president Kamala Harris.

“Actually, I think it's one of the many reasons they reelected him back to this office, because he's a businessman who understands the economy and knows how to fix it, and he's doing it right now, just like he did in his first term,” she said.

Despite Trump’s claims to have lowered costs of living for Americans since returning to the White House in January, voters are not happy with his performance on affordability issues thus far.

According to a recent Gallup poll, only 36 percent of voters approve of his performance as president, giving him the lowest rating of his second term. A Politico poll released this week showed 46 percent of respondents saying the cost of living in America is worse than they can remember at any point, including 37 percent of voters who pulled levers for Trump last year.

Nearly half of respondents also said they blame Trump — not Biden or Harris — for the economy’s current condition.

But at the same time, Trump continues to tout his own record, such as it is.

In an interview with Politico this week, he told correspondent Dasha Burns that he gives himself an “A-plus-plus-plus-plus” when she asked him to grade his own record on the economy thus far.

 

The Radical Left Meets the Extreme Right


Allied against Jewish support for Israel


In the last decades, Democracy has become “just another word,” a political force that allowed Wall Street financiers, corporate elites, and global speculators to siphon a major portion of the world’s wealth into their bank accounts. Rejecting neo-liberalism and globalism, the radical left and extreme right grow in popularity, each with competing visions of freedom, liberty, social awareness, cultural definition, and economic progress. They defy each other on most issues and bind together on other issues — respect for national sovereignty, distaste for foreign wars, and antipathy to excessive interference in the media, educational, and political institutions by Jewish groups that favor the foreign nation of Israel and are complicit in Israel’s genocide of the Palestinian people.

The major of MAGA (make America great again) are combining with the minor of MADA (make America democratic again) to create MASA (make America sane again). Unexpected support for the Palestinians has come from those in Trump’s MAGA universe. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) called Israel’s actions in the Gaza Strip a “genocide.” Former congressional representative, Matt Gaetz, and political strategist, Steve Bannon, “are among those condemning Israel’s actions and warning that the issue is a political liability for the Trump administration with the president’s base.” Candace Owens, whom the Washington Post called “the new face of black conservatism,” conservative podcasters Tucker Carlson and Joe Rogan, and white supremacist Nick Fuentes have described Israel’s actions in Gaza as genocide. Kevin David Roberts, the president of the ultra-conservative think tank, Heritage Foundation, defended Tucker Carlson’s interview with white nationalist Nick Fuentes, whose acceptance into the podcast atmosphere breaks a tradition of not allowing the questioning of an inordinate amount of Jewish power and influence in American political, media, educational, and financial life.

It was not too long ago that charges of undue influence in political and economic affairs by American Jews were uttered in “safe rooms” and squashed with vengeance when publicly said. A Jewish person who questioned the practices of his fellow worshippers or Israel received the title of “self-hating” Jew. I remember a Jewish person, who allied with a nationalist group that accused Jews of unfair practices, being hounded into suicide. In all walks of life — political, religious, entertainment, sport, business, education, culture — the slightest accusation that Jews or Israel behaved improperly was met with standard expressions — self-hating Jew, canard, blood libel, holocaust denier, ant-Semite, anti-Semitic trope, Jew hater, and anti-Jewish screed. Accusations were never answered; an adjective was sufficient to demean and cancel the voice and the person who dared to make the accusation. Times have changed.

Attention to the genocide has escalated. A Gallup poll finds that only 32 percent of Americans approve Israel’s military action in Gaza, a 10-point drop from September 2024.

The sudden rise of antipathy to Zionist Jews, expressed by fellow Jews, elates and surprises. One example is “We Have Talked Enough About Ourselves” by Ben Moser, a long and complete essay of how Zionism has betrayed Judaism. Despite the shift in public attitude and tone, it remains frustrating to realize that what has been said and proposed for decades to halt the genocide has not stopped the trajectory.

Challenging genocidal Israel and its worldwide followers who deceive humanity and blithely decimate all those who are a barrier to an ethnically pure and Greater Israel has been difficult. Each day, in Lebanon, Syria, Gaza, and the West Bank, Israel military kills at will, deciding who lives and who dies. No reason to ask how this can be; we know that a small group controls a sufficient amount of the American pie and has used the largess to steer the media into manipulating public opinion and bribe the political system to support Israel’s objectives.

Although hostility toward Jews as American Jews and not as Zionist Jews has always been minimal compared to expressed and overt animosity to Muslims, Arabs, Blacks, Chinese, Catholics, Mexicans, immigrants, and transgender people, organizations combating the non-existent anti-Semitism are vocal and prolific. The country’s wealthiest, best-educated, healthiest, and overly represented group in finance, university leadership, sports management, medical and legal professions, and government gets magnitudes more attention to being victims of prejudice and hostility than those who suffer severe social, economic, and political difficulties due to their creeds. Much of this anti-Semitic farce is obviously contradictory. One of the several organizations fighting rampant “anti-Semitism” is a shadowy organization, Stop anti-Semitism. They herald that their “findings are nothing short of alarming.”

  • 55% of Jewish students have personally been victims of antisemitism at their schools.
  • 43% did not feel safe enough to report the incidents. Of those who did report, a staggering 87% believe their school failed to properly investigate.
  • 43% hide their Jewish identity from their classmates out of fear.
  • 72% feel unwelcome in certain spaces on campus simply for being Jewish.”
  • 67% say Jews are completely excluded from their schools DEI initiatives.
  • 69% are blamed for the actions of Israel—actions they have no control over.
  • 67% feel their university did not take sufficient action to protect Jewish students in the wake of the 10/7 massacre.
  • And perhaps most heartbreaking: 43% would not recommend their school to fellow.

Good reasons for the “findings.” The Times of Israel reports,

For many American college students, a recent uptick in already high campus hostility to Israel and Jews is shaping a new wave of aliyah, Hebrew for immigration to Israel, turning an embattled student identity into a commitment to build a life in the Jewish state.

Exaggerations (anti-Semitism??), paranoia, playing victim, displaying inferiority complexes, and guilt feelings. No examples of violence against Jewish students. Plenty of examples of physical and social violence against campus demonstrators, including Jews. The reality is that the mass of college students do not want to associate with those they consider directly attached to committing the genocide. Jews have become the most hated people on the globe. Other contradictions.

New York University announced a “seven-figure donation” to create a center to study and combat antisemitism shortly after the Oct. 7 terrorist attacks, and other schools including the University of Michigan and Brandeis University launched similar programs.” Something wrong here.

How did Hamas’ attack on Israelis provoke anti-Semitism against American students? Why haven’t schools created centers to combat discrimination, prejudice, verbal and physical attacks on Arabs and Muslims that proliferated after October 7? From Finding My Grandmother’s Ma’amoul Cookie in Brooklyn by Nadine Apelian.

After October 7, it began with a barrage of words on social media and school pickups. Not at us, but around us, and then directly at them. I got a call from the school nurse one afternoon: my 8-year-old daughter had thrown up. When I arrived, she told me that a group of kids had called me and my mother “terrorists.” My 6-year-old son came home confused, asking why his friends kept wondering why he wasn’t “on the side of the good guys.”

Doug Carter, superintendent of the Indiana state police, said “his officers broke up a tent encampment on campus last year because of speech that was “encouraging the death of the Jewish people globally.” His reply to a public radio reporter who told him that “Jewish students had been active in the protests, including holding a Passover Seder at the encampment, and that they had not heard antisemitic comments” was, “That’s not correct; go on to the next question because I saw it with my own two eyes.”

Every issue is scrutinized in how it affects Zionist Jews and their precious genocidal Israel. The importance of Zohran Mamdani winning the mayorship of New York City is diverted from social-democratic relationship to anti-Zionist opinions and the possibility he will not purchase Israel bonds. Jonathan Greenblatt, the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) chief, announced a “Mamdani Monitor,” a public tracker of new York City mayor elect Mamdani’s policies and personnel appointments that the ADL views as threatening Jewish security. Greenblatt stated that the “fierce animosity toward the Jewish state has characterized his entire time in public life” and that “he surrounded himself with people who are notorious for their antisemitism.” What is “Jewish security,” where is this “Jewish state,” and, if Greenblatt means Israel, what is wrong with joining the billions of the world population in having a “fierce animosity toward the Jewish state?” Greenblatt’s aggressive words are defamatory; he should be sued for defamation and indicted for inciting violence.

Contradiction – Zionist Jews consider themselves a nation, part of a foreign nation within their birth country, and howl anti-Semitism when loyalty to their native country is questioned.

Contradiction ─ Zionists have national Zionist organizations joined to the World Zionist organization (WZO), whose office is in Tel Aviv. Hundreds of organizations throughout Europe and North America raise money and funnel the funds to Israel. Each year, the Z3 Conference boasts it “brings together top thinkers, educators, activists, artists, community leaders and more from across the Jewish world. Through bold conversations and dynamic panels, we explore the biggest questions facing Israel, the Diaspora and the Jewish future.” All howl anti-Semitism when Zionism is termed an international conspiracy.

fifth column of several hundreds of thousands of Israel dual citizens, tourists, residents, and supporters in the U.S. operate for the benefit of Israel. Daily revelations of their nefarious operations are not countered by U.S. intelligence and policing agencies and have no effect on their continuous manipulation of American institutions. More recent activities.

The Times of Israel, “Inside Israel’s ‘Esther Project’: DOJ filings reveal paid US influencer campaign amid AI-powered PR blitz,” by Asaf Elia-Shalev, 1 October 2025, Updated: 10 November 2025.

The filings reveal that a firm called Bridges Partners LLC has been hired to manage an influencer network under a project code-named the “Esther Project.” In its disclosure, required under the Foreign Agents Registration Act, Bridges said its work was intended to “assist with promoting cultural interchange between the United States and Israel” and specified that the engagement runs through a German division of the global PR firm Havas. Attached documents show that the firm, owned by Israeli consultants Uri Steinberg and Yair Levi, was formed in June 2025 in Delaware and soon after received nearly $200,000 to recruit and coordinate US-based social media influencers.

The article reveals that the “Esther Project” campaign complements Israel’s $1.5 million per month contract with Brad Parscale, Salem Media’s chief strategy officer, and a former campaign strategist for President Donald Trump.

Filed on Sept. 18, Parscale’s firm Clock Tower X LLC registered as a foreign agent for Israel’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, with Havas again serving as intermediary. The contract calls for “strategic communications” to combat antisemitism in the United States. Underlying documents reveal plans to deploy AI-driven tools: monthly SEO campaigns using the MarketBrew AI platform and efforts to shape outputs of GPT-based chatbots.

Parscale’s Israel campaign promises to produce 100 ads or pieces of content each month, plus 5,000 different variations of those ads, a level of output that likely requires automated tools.

The Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, a “think tank” that examines U.S. foreign policy, reports that “Israel wants to pay US pastors a stipend to spread the word.”

A newly-created firm called Show Faith by Works is embarking on a “geofencing” campaign to target Christian churches and colleges across the American Southwest with pro-Israel advertisements. The pastors and congregations themselves are seemingly unaware of this campaign, and some have concerns with Israel’s methods to target Christians.

According to the firm’s filing under the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA), Show Faith by Works will “geofence the actual boundaries of every Major (sic) church in California, Arizona, Nevada, and Colorado (sic) and all Christian Colleges during worship times” and then “track attendees and continue to target [them] with ads” on behalf of Israel.

Nations, Human Rights organizations, United Nations agencies, and a great mass of the world’s population accuse Israel of oppression, apartheid, and genocide, all the great things, and Israel continues uninterrupted in oppression, apartheid, and genocide. The principal reason is due to U.S. military, financial, and moral support for the oppressive, apartheid, and genocidal nation. The support comes from a double whammy of coopted American government officials, coopted by organizations that disburse campaign funds from Jewish groups and financiers and from a coopted media that accepts contributions from Israel supporters in exchange for a slight control of their media presentations. Stopping the money flow from Israel’s supporters to Israel’s enablers is the key to stopping Israel in its genocide of the Palestinian people. But, how?

Getting the job done.
Managed boycott, already imposed on Israel, should turn inward, and be imposed on all individuals, companies, media, institutions, agencies, Uber drivers, whoever walks and talks for Israel. Don’t buy from them, don’t sell to them, don’t invest in them, don’t lend to them, don’t talk to them, and don’t give them air to breathe. List the names silently, vocally, throughout the Internet, on parchment, and in the sky — a steady stream of invective and call to action that empties the pockets of those who supply dollars that purchase deaths.

Exposing and hindering the charity scams is another consideration.
Not publicized is that genocidal Israel, for decades, has had the second to third highest poverty rate in the 38 OECD countries. This is due to marginalization of its Arab community, male unemployment in the ultra-orthodox community, prejudice against Ethiopians and Yemenites, insufficient welfare programs, and deliberate means to soak money for apartheid Israel by playing victim and appealing to its worldwide Jewish and Christian followers. The massive amount of funds from the charities are either directly used to increase Israel’s military capability or serve to divert funds needed for welfare to Israel’s military industry and land appropriations. A few examples of the tens of “charitable organizations.”

International Fellowship of Christians and Jews (IFCJ)
Founded in 1983 by Yechiel Eckstein, its mission is to promote understanding and cooperation between Jews and Christians, and provide humanitarian aid for the people of Israel. IFCJ states, “With so many Jewish people living in unthinkable conditions right now in Israel and around the world (five to ten) — including innocent children, families, and elderly Holocaust survivors (are there any young among the few who have already managed well for the last 80 years?) — please make the most generous gift you can.”

Christians in Defense of Israel
There has never been a more important time for Christians and Jews to stand in solidarity with Israel and its right to exist as a sovereign nation.

Samaritan’s Purse teams and ministry partners.
Offer various forms of relief to the Israeli people following the Oct. 7 attacks. “We are providing 21 new ambulances, including seven that are armor-plated to guard against sniper rounds and other attacks.”

Jewish National Fund
Supports evacuees who have lost their homes after the Oct. 7 attack, as well as helping families and children with basic necessities.

B’nai B’rith International
Opened its Israel Emergency Fund in order to provide direct aid to Israeli citizens in need.

Friends of the Israel Defense Forces
Supports the needs of Israel Defense Forces.

Jewish Agency for Israel – North American council
Promotes Aliyah and encourages every Jewish person to engage with Israel.

Israel Friends
Committed to protecting the people of Israel by providing essential protective equipment, medical supplies, and humanitarian aid directly where it is needed.

A multitude of other “charities” claim to help destitute Jews around the world; Subtract the Jews in Canada and Western Europe, few who need external assistance, and almost all other Jews are in Israel. These Jews receive aid in improving hospitals, stealing land, building settlements, reinforcing checkpoints, destroying Palestinian life and making killing comfortable for the Israeli military. Just Peace Advocates reports that “in 2022, over 650 entities in Israel received more than $237.5 million from over 190 Canadian charities.” That’s from Canada, whose Jewish population is seven percent of the number of Jews in the United states.

Countering these hypocritical “charities,” who care more for the maniacal Israelis than for their own countrymen, and halting their shipments of American dollars to genocidal Israel has a fourfold approach.

(1) Expose and shame them for the wasted human beings they are.

(2) Have them declared agents for the state of Israel.

(3) Review their tax status.

(4) Label them as terrorist organizations, who are enabling the genocide.

Campaign fundraising
Media control by Israel’s supporter has had less of an effect as Internet web sites have drawn more followers. The Palestinians are beginning to convince the public of their plight and the political arena has shifted slightly, but money still controls most votes and Israel’s supporters have hordes of bucks to contribute to their cause. Noting a shift in public sentiment, with Mamdani elected and a growing number of politicos criticizing Israel, the money people are more willing to empty their pockets for their beloved and oppressive Israel. The 2024 congressional races exhausted $9.5 billion of campaign contributions. Ninety five million citizens must contribute an average of $100 each to raise that amount. Through a variety of schemes, a few of the many of Israel’s billionaire supporters and its army of disillusioned supporters can funnel that same huge amount of funds to a variety of selected candidates

No need to despair, not all congressional races need attention, just almost all of them. Lacking in the political scene are America For All PACs devoted to defeat candidates that represent foreign nations, such as Israel, and America For All organizations to raise money in targeted elections contend foreign lobbies, such as the Israel Lobby, and disable foreign firsters, such as the Israel firsters, with words, deeds, and greenbacks. What loyal American would not join and contribute to those patriotic enterprises?

Meanwhile, all other activities should be intensified — exposing the media manipulations, demonstrating against the genocide and the genocide perpetrators, revealing Israel’s supporters desecration of our democracy, distributing vital information to every American by every available means.

A small clique of rabid and criminal elements have seized the steering wheel of the U.S.S. America and to save their illegal, twisted, and commanding position are now disabling the fabric of American democracy, throttling dissent in the crew by vicious actions. Saving the Palestinians from genocide has escalated to saving Americans from fratricide.

Dan Lieberman publishes commentaries on foreign policy, economics, and politics at substack.com.  He is author of the non-fiction books A Third Party Can Succeed in AmericaNot until They Were GoneThink Tanks of DCThe Artistry of a Dog, and a novel: The Victory (under a pen name, David L. McWellan). Read other articles by Dan.