Showing posts sorted by date for query WILDFIRE. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query WILDFIRE. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Tuesday, July 14, 2026

 

The super El Nino is here

The super El Nino is here
The super El Nino is here and seas are heating up to bath temperature levels. / IntelliNewsFacebook
By Ben Aris in Berlin July 13, 2026

The planet’s seas are on their way to being as warm as bath water as the predicted super El Niño arrives. It is already clear that this year’s oceanic heating event will be the most powerful on record.

Global sea temperatures have already climbed past their previous all-time high, smashing records on their way, and forecasters warn that this year's El Niño could bring devastating extreme weather events.

The seas are running a fever. June was the hottest on record for the world's oceans as well as the land, according to Copernicus. Nearly 40% of ocean area worldwide is in the midst of a marine heatwave, with intense hot patches in the Mediterranean Sea and the Pacific Ocean more than 10°C hotter than usual. It's the latest in a wave of ocean warming that began in 2023.

Oceans absorb more than 90% of the excess heat trapped by the greenhouse gases released when fossil fuels are burnt. Waters at the surface also exchange heat and moisture with the atmosphere, helping to drive hotter temperatures and more extreme weather. For every one degree Celsius of warming, the atmosphere can hold about 7% more moisture. It also holds onto the water for longer. That means more time between rainfall, and heavier, more dangerous deluges when rain does fall.

A recent study found that at least a fifth of heatwaves on land begin in the ocean. Last year, more people died from extreme heat than from road crashes in Europe, according to the World Resources Institute.

Scientists have been warning of a super charged El Niño that will go into full swing as the summer ends, but nine of ten forecast models are already describing a “strong-to-historic” event. The single most likely outcome by late 2026 is a "very strong" El Niño — the top tier of the scale, reserved for the handful of events since the 1950s in which the central Pacific warms by more than 2°C above normal.

El Niño is the warm phase of a natural climate cycle, the El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO), driven by temperature swings in the central and eastern Pacific. It recurs roughly every two to seven years, typically emerges during the northern autumn, and can persist into the following year.

In general, El Niño years are associated with heavier rainfall in places like California and South America and drier conditions across Australia and Southeast Asia. And although El Niño tends to suppress hurricanes near the United States, other regions tend to see stronger cyclones with more rainfall.

This year the impact is expected to peak from late 2026 into 2027, as what scientists often call Earth's most important "control knob" for year-to-year climate variability is turned up to the maximum setting on record. On a scale of one to ten, it’s going to be an eleven.

NOAA's Climate Prediction Center, which moved to an El Niño Advisory on June 11, puts the probability of the event reaching "very strong" intensity by the November–January peak at around 63%, with a near-certain chance that some form of El Niño persists through the northern winter. Ocean temperatures are already at record levels, Europe has endured a record-breaking heatwave, and marine heatwaves have flared across the western Mediterranean and the Atlantic seaboard.

During El Niño, above-average water temperatures in the central and eastern Pacific shift the position and strength of the subtropical jet stream, with effects that reach into the Caribbean and the Atlantic. Because the phenomenon concentrates its deepest pool of warm water — and its lowest wind shear — across that basin, it turns the Pacific into a hyper-fuelled engine for major hurricanes and powerful typhoons. Tellingly, Taiwan, China and Vietnam are all already being battered this weekend by Typhoon Bavi, forecast to be among the most powerful storms to ever strike Asia.

The numbers are already extreme. As of early July, the Niño-region sea-surface temperature anomaly had crossed 1.8°C above the 1991–2020 average — more than three standard deviations above the mean. In statistical terms, anything beyond two standard deviations is treated as an extreme aberration; this is, quite literally, an off-the-chart event.

Desperate measures

El Niño Is not going to smash previous records, scientists say it will break them by a huge margin. Some are starting to suggest desperate measures. 

"With all the July model runs now in, it is very likely that 2026 will see the largest El Niño event since records began in the late 1800s – and potentially by a truly mind-blowing margin. The median estimate is now 3.6C, roughly 0.8C hotter than the prior record (2.75C)," climatologist Zeke Hausfather said in a newsletter post

 

The proposal involves spraying microscopic sea salt particles into low-lying clouds over the Pacific Ocean. The salt particles would make the clouds brighter, allowing them to reflect more sunlight back into space. By reducing the amount of solar energy reaching the ocean's surface, researchers believe the technique could cool Pacific waters enough to reduce the strength of a developing Super El Niño.

Computer simulations suggest that, under the right conditions, the approach could cut the intensity of a Super El Niño by as much as 40%.

However, scientists stress that the idea remains purely theoretical and is not being recommended for real-world deployment. The Earth's climate system is extraordinarily complex, and no one fully understands the long-term consequences of deliberately altering cloud cover over the Pacific.

Even relatively small changes could disrupt the natural El Niño-La Niña cycle, with potentially far-reaching effects on global agriculture, rainfall patterns, heatwaves, floods, droughts and ultimately food and commodity prices.

For now, researchers see marine cloud brightening as an area for further study rather than an immediate climate solution. Nevertheless, the fact that geoengineering proposals are increasingly being discussed illustrates the growing concern among scientists over the scale of future climate risks and the possibility that conventional emissions reductions alone may not be sufficient to limit their impact.

Seas heating up

The clearest sign that something unusual is under way lies not in the tropics alone but in the oceans around the world. In June, the average sea-surface temperature for the extra-polar ocean — the vast band between 60°S and 60°N that excludes the ice-affected poles — was the highest ever recorded for the month, edging past the previous June record set in 2024 by 0.01°C, according to the Copernicus Climate Change Service.

That margin sounds trivial, but it matters for two reasons. First, it is a global average across an enormous area, so shifting it even a hundredth of a degree requires a colossal amount of additional heat spread across tens of millions of square kilometres of sea. Second, it comes on top of 2024's record, which was itself an outlier — meaning the ocean is not merely warm but setting fresh highs from an already elevated baseline, with little sign of the "cooling-off" that would normally follow a record year.

The heat is not evenly spread. It pools in hotspots where the numbers become genuinely startling: parts of the Mediterranean, the Gulf, and shallow tropical seas have pushed into the low 30s°C, temperatures at which coral bleaches, fish stocks flee or die, and the water gives up ever more moisture to feed storms. Marine heatwaves — prolonged spells of anomalously warm water — have become more frequent, more intense and longer-lasting worldwide, and this year's have struck close to home for Europe, scorching the western Mediterranean and reaching up the Atlantic coasts.

Those warm waters cause their own related damage. An unusually hot Mediterranean fuelled Storm Daniel in September 2023, a rare subtropical storm that ripped through Libya leaving more than 2,000 dead in its wake as a precursor to what this year’s super El Niño could cause.

Two forces are stacking up this year. One is El Niño itself, a natural redistribution of heat that temporarily warms the surface Pacific and nudges up the global average. The other is the long-term, human-driven warming trend on which El Niño now rides. The oceans have absorbed the overwhelming majority of the extra heat trapped by greenhouse gases — well over 90% — and each El Niño therefore breaks records from a higher starting line than the last. The result is a temporary but significant boost to global mean surface temperature layered on top of a rising floor: El Niño supplies the spike, climate change supplies the staircase.

The practical upshot is that the coming twelve months are likely to be exceptionally bad. This year's disaster season is likely to be worse than last year’s with a new batch of global temperature records, heightened risks of drought, flooding, coral bleaching and intense tropical cyclones running into 2027.

 

 

Heatwaves plague Europe

June 2026 was the hottest June recorded for western Europe and the second warmest globally, driven by the highest sea surface temperatures (SSTs) on record for the month, according to the monthly update from the Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S), implemented by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF).

Europe also saw widespread dryness that, together with extreme heat, contributed to wildfire activity, particularly in the Iberian Peninsula and southern France, and heightened drought risk in parts of eastern Europe. The June heatwave occurred against a backdrop of increasingly dry soils across western and central Europe, further exacerbating drought conditions that had begun to develop during May's heatwave.

Globally June 2026 was the second-warmest in the ERA5 dataset, with an average surface air temperature of 16.54°C, 0.56°C above the 1991-2020 average for the month, behind June 2024.

The average temperature over European land in June 2026 was the second-highest on record for the month. Western Europe, the region most affected by the heatwave, experienced its warmest June on record, with an average temperature of 20.74°C, 3.05°C above the 1991–2020 average for June, surpassing the previous record set in June 2025.

The heat in parts of Western Europe is continuing in July, fuelling devastating wildfires in France and the Iberian Peninsula. Last year saw wildfires in Europe pass 1mn hectares for the first time. This year is likely to be worse.

Spain’s Fabra Observatory in Barcelona - one of WMO’s long-term weather observing stations - recorded 40.5°C on July 8 - the highest temperature in more than one century of data. France had a widespread amber alert (the second highest level) for heat as well as a high fire danger level because of drought, high temperatures and low humidity, according to Meteo-France.

WMO, its members and partners are mobilizing with early warnings and coordinated heat-health action plans to try to save lives and inform decision-making on how to minimise economic and ecosystem damage and disruption to infrastructure and labour productivity. It is accompanied by localized violent storms and in some areas by worsening drought and the risk of wildfires.

Extreme heat is expected to occur at increasing frequency and intensity and duration, according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.  

“Heatwaves like this are what we expect to see in a changing climate,” said John Kennedy, head of climate information at WMO. “In the 50 years since the historic heatwave in 1976, Europe as a whole has warmed by around two degrees. It’s the fastest warming continent and extremes of temperature have increased too,” he said.

Sunday, July 12, 2026

Firefighters gain upper hand on 'horrific' Spain wildfires that killed at least 12

Firefighters gained the upper hand on wildfires in Spain on Saturday, aided by better weather conditions. Around 500 firefighters are battling the blaze that erupted Thursday in the southern region of Andalusia. At least 12 people have died since the fire started, according to officials, and another seven are officially missing.

Issued on: 11/07/2026 - 
By: FRANCE 24
Video by: Sarah MORRIS

Cover image: The wildfire broke out on Thursday in the Andalusia region of southern Spain. © Jose Jordan, AFP
02:16




Firefighters aided by better weather on Saturday gained the upper hand on one of Spain's deadliest wildfires as survivors described "horrific" and terrifying moments as they escaped the flames.

Around 500 firefighters backed by over 20 water-dropping aircraft were battling the blaze, which erupted Thursday in the Gallardos area of the southern region of Andalusia, home to many foreign residents.


"We were absolutely terrified. We could see the flames. It was horrific," Manoli Ramos, 72, a councillor in the small whitewashed village of Bedar where the victims were found, said.


She recalled another major wildfire in 2012 when residents had been able to return home the following day, saying: "This time it was like hell."

Officials said the 12 people who died were of different nationalities who had been trapped in vehicles and as they tried to flee on foot.

Austin Crilly, an 87-year-old British resident evacuated by police from the wildfire zone, said he was watching television when he "saw a huge black cloud, well I thought it was a cloud".

"I thought, 'My God, I will shut the door'. Then, five minutes later, there was banging at the door. They said, 'Take your money, take your cards and get out'," he said.

Officials said some of those who died had not followed orders to evacuate or to shelter in place once the flames got too close.
'Best news'

The fast-moving fire – one of the deadliest in Spain's recent history – showed signs of easing Saturday, allowing firefighters to directly attack the flames for the first time, officials said.

Twelve people died in the blaze, which spread rapidly across parched woodland and scrub. © Jose Jordan, AFP

"The overnight evolution has been favourable and the weather conditions allow us to face the day with better prospects than yesterday," Antonio Sanz, the Andalusian regional government's emergency chief, told reporters.

"For the first time we will be able to carry out a direct attack on the fire. Until now, both the weather conditions and the nature of the blaze only allowed us to work defensively," he added.

Strong winds that had fuelled the fire had eased, humidity levels had risen and temperatures had fallen, Sanz said.

The blaze has so far burned around 6,600 hectares in an area of steep ravines that is hard for vehicles to reach, he said.

There was no immediate confirmation of the identities of the 12 who died but the authorities said many of the victims may be foreigners who were in Bedar.

"It wasn't good. Not good at all. I'd never seen anything like it. You see things like that in films, but never in real life," said Martin Smith, 63, a British tourist who was evacuated with his wife, Elizabeth, 65, from the campsite where they were on holiday.

Sanz said there had been no reports of additional deaths overnight, describing that as "the best news we could have".
Missing people

He said Spain's Civil Guard police had searched the affected areas without finding any further victims, although he cautioned that the search was continuing.

"That does not mean it cannot happen, but after the Civil Guard swept the area, including locations that were still hotspots, it gives us hope," he said.

Sanz said references to 23 missing people were misleading, explaining that the figure referred to people whose relatives had been unable to contact them and who could have reached evacuation centres or other safe locations.

He said seven formal missing persons reports had been filed.

However, officials said they could not establish a definitive toll until autopsies had been completed and the bodies recovered from the fire had been formally identified.

Scientists agree that human-driven climate change is making extreme weather events such as heatwaves more likely and more intense.

Saturday, July 11, 2026


Spain Battles One Of Its Deadliest Wildfires Amid Extreme Heat



Wildfire in southern Spain on July 10, 2026. Photo Credit: Wcdde2, Wikipedia Commons

July 12, 2026 
EurActiv
By Charles Cohen
Key TakeawaysDeadly wildfire in Andalusia, Spain: A blaze in Los Gallardos has killed 12 people (mostly British and Belgian nationals), injured at least 8, displaced 1,448 residents, and left 23 missing after burning 6,600 hectares.
Ongoing emergency response: Around 500 firefighters are battling the fire; the region remains on high alert with extreme risk in parts of Andalusia, though Friday night allowed better mobilisation.
EU support and broader context: Ursula von der Leyen offered support as the EU deploys 777 firefighters preventively; Spain is also receiving €120.55 million from the EU Solidarity Fund for last year’s fires amid record heat and heightened summer risks.

(EurActiv) — A wildfire in the southern Spanish region of Andalusia has killed 12 people and injured at least eight, making it one of the country’s deadliest in recent history.

The fire broke out on Thursday in Los Gallardos, Andalusia, and has since spread across 6,600 hectares, with around 500 emergency personnel battling the blaze on the ground.


On Saturday, Antonio Sanz, vice president of the Andalusian regional government and regional minister for emergencies, said Friday night had passed “relatively well,” allowing firefighters to mobilise more easily.

However, the region remains on high alert, with an extreme wildfire risk persisting across parts of northern and southeastern Andalusia, according to regional authorities.

A total of 1,448 residents have been displaced, and at least 23 people remain missing. Andalusia’s regional leader, Juan Manuel Moreno, said on Friday that most of the 12 people killed are believed to be British and Belgian nationals.

The natural disaster is one of Spain’s deadliest on record, according to local reports, followed by similar events in the Canary Islands in 1984 and in Lloret de Mar in 1979.

“We offer our full support to Spain and to the brave firefighters and rescue workers who are tackling this emergency,” Ursula von der Leyen, the President of the European Commission, saidon Friday on social media.

The EU executive announced this week that 777 firefighters from across the bloc would be deployed preventively to high-risk areas in member states, including Spain, as the country braces for high temperatures this summer.

Last month, the country recorded its highest daily average temperatures since 1950, with temperatures reaching 42°C in parts of the country.

Spain already endured severe wildfires last year, prompting Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez to announce in May that the country would deploy its largest-ever wildfire response this summer.

Earlier this week, MEPs approved the allocation of €120.55 million from the European Union Solidarity Fund (EUSF) to help Madrid respond to the damage caused by last year’s wildfires, after the Council backed the measure last month.

The Deadly Costs of Misguided US Wildfire Policy


 July 10, 2026

Smoke from the Riverside fire, Mt Hood National Forest. Photo: Jeffrey St. Clair.

At the end of June, the deaths of three firefighters near the Colorado-Utah border put Trump’s new Wildland Fire Service into focus. The firefighters had been deployed by helicopter to a remote area to put out a brush fire and were overwhelmed. But among the tributes and reminders of how wildland firefighters put their lives on the line to protect communities was the question from Timothy Ingalsbee, a former federal firefighter and founder of the group Firefighters United For Safety, Ethics and Ecology:  “Why were they attacking that fire in the first place?”

The reason is that the Trump administration has reinstated a full suppression strategy applied to every wildfire, resurrecting an almost 100-year-old debate over how to handle wildfires — a debate that science and long-standing indigenous practices had settled by the late 1970s. Combined with the establishment of the US Wildland Fire Service, such policies could cost more lives.

But first, you may be asking: what is the US Wildland Fire Service? In January, the administration announced it was taking steps to create the service, which unifies wildland fire management programs across the Department of the Interior (DOI). Previously, responsibilities were distributed among offices within the Bureau of Indian Affairs, the Bureau of Land Management, the Fish and Wildlife Service, the National Park Service, the Office of Aviation Services, and the Office of Wildland Fire.

The reorganization, however, does not include the US Forest Service (USFS) within the US Department of Agriculture, which is responsible for national forests and grasslands and oversees more than two-thirds of the nation’s federal wildland firefighting resources. But USFS and the Wildland Fire Service still coordinate through the National Wildfire Coordinating Group and the National Interagency Fire Center. The administration is also looking into merging USFS fire management into the newly formed Wildland Fire Service.

If you find all of this confusing, the National Smokejumper Association created an organizational flowchart (Figure 1).

Figure 1

Source: National Smokejumper Association Facebook post, April 11, 2026.

To be clear, streamlining is not a bad thing. The mix of federal, state, and local firefighting agencies can present issues depending on where a fire starts and determining which entity is responsible, and when the command structure within one entity, such as the federal government, looks like a bowl of spaghetti after a toddler gets hold of it, that can create confusion. However, restructuring like this requires more thought and care. Under the new structure, for which the administration did not obtain Congressional approval or funding, the Wildland Fire Service is separating firefighters from land management experts.

In a letter to DOI Secretary Doug Bergum, ranking Democrats on committees that fund the department wrote: “While consolidation could be an effective strategy to improve efficiency and coordination, the Administration’s approach risks diverting critical resources and funding away from land management agencies without any public plan to replace those capabilities.” For example, the Bureau of Land Management requires a team of scientists, land managers, field staff, and firefighters to handle tasks like vegetation management, protecting endangered habitats, managing grazing, and helping the land recover after a fire. But the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has eliminated a lot of those positions, and now, by removing the firefighters, various bureaus and services within DOI will suffer even more staffing shortages. As a result of these concerns, lawmakers have blocked funding and authorization for a Wildland Fire Service and USFS merger until a feasibility study can be conducted.

Then there are the current suppression policies of the Wildland Fire Service and USFS. In April, DOI Secretary Doug Burgum sent a memo to the heads of the various bureaus and services under the department calling for “the presumption of a full suppression strategy applied to every wildfire under DOI management.” In an oversight hearing by the House  Committee on Natural Resources, Subcommittee on Federal Lands, USFS Chief Tom Schultz also confirmed and defended the new full-suppression policy.

To be blunt, full suppression is a product of settler colonialism that has no basis in science. Established in the West under various European colonizers and later adopted by the Mexican and American governments, full suppression initially was used to silence indigenous groups’ cultural practices, which often used fire. European colonizers saw fire as a nuisance. Driven by land expansion and an effort to assimilate indigenous groups through projects like Spanish missions and boarding schools, colonizers enacted strict laws to discourage these burning practices. This suppression directly targeted the cultural foundations that maintained native identity and hindered the ability to organize marginalized groups.

Though these measures originated as a means to erase indigenous culture, by the 1930s the USFS had pivoted to an economic justification, implementing the 10 a.m. rule, which mandated that every fire be suppressed by 10:00 the next morning. After several disastrous fire seasons, the government had determined that full suppression as policy would be cost-effective. It wasn’t. Research from the 1960s to the present, along with indigenous land practices, has long shown that failing to allow fire to naturally remove overgrown vegetation or insect-infested trees leaves more fuel for future fires. It’s not hyperbole to say that a major reason we have so many massive wildfires today is the 10 a.m. policy.

What is happening with federal wildfire management is another example of a recurring pattern with the administration: the marriage of hastily executed structural overhauls with a blatant disregard for established historical and scientific evidence. Other examples include the dismantling of federal support for renewable energy and the current debate over restructuring the Federal Emergency Management Agency. And the question is always: to what end? If the goal is to actually make DOI more efficient, such a restructuring needs to be carefully implemented to ensure changes don’t affect its capabilities, including its evidence-based fire management practices.

Instead, the US is stumbling blindly ahead, and it’s the American people who suffer as a result.

This first appeared on CEPR.

Friday, July 10, 2026

The Wood-Wide Web: How Canadian forest research is reframing ecology and business

Dr. Tim Sandle
July 7, 2026
Digital Journal

Evergreen conifers are less able to survive in drought conditions than other heartier trees that line the landscapes. Source – US Geological Survey

Forests are often described in terms of individual trees, timber volume, carbon storage, or biodiversity. Yet one of the most influential developments in forest ecology over the past three decades has been the recognition that trees are not merely isolated competitors for light, water and nutrients. They are also connected through underground fungal networks that can move resources and information through forest ecosystems.

Much of this shift in thinking is associated with the work of Canadian forest ecologist Suzanne Simard, Professor of Forest Ecology at the University of British Columbia and leader of the Mother Tree Project.

Simard’s internationally recognised research helped establish that trees can be linked below ground through common mycorrhizal networks — fungal threads associated with roots. Her landmark 1997 Nature paper, “Net transfer of carbon between ectomycorrhizal tree species in the field,” demonstrated carbon transfer between paper birch and Douglas-fir connected by shared ectomycorrhizal fungi.

The idea has since become widely known as the “wood-wide web”, a phrase that captures the sense of forests as connected systems. While the metaphor has sometimes outrun the science, the underlying research has opened up serious questions about how forests regenerate, how seedlings survive, how carbon moves below ground, and how forestry practices might need to change in response to climate stress.

From competition to connection


Traditional forestry models often placed heavy emphasis on competition: trees competing for sunlight, water and soil nutrients. This view underpinned management practices such as clear-cutting, replanting and removal of competing vegetation. Simard’s research challenged this simplification by showing that mixed-species forests may involve resource exchange as well as competition.

Her work indicated that carbon can move between tree species through fungal networks, with seasonal and ecological context appearing to matter. For example, paper birch and Douglas-fir may exchange carbon under different light conditions and stages of growth. Such findings suggest that neighbouring species may function less as simple rivals and more as participants in a complex adaptive system.

This does not mean that forests operate as harmonious wholes or that every tree altruistically supports every other tree. Rather, the science points to a more nuanced ecological reality. Competition, facilitation, kinship effects, nutrient exchange and fungal mediation may all occur simultaneously, depending on species, fungal partners, climate, soil type and disturbance history.

The importance of “mother trees”


One of Simard’s most influential ideas is that large, older trees can act as highly connected hubs within mycorrhizal networks. These “mother trees” may play an important role in supporting forest regeneration by linking seedlings into existing fungal networks and contributing to below-ground resource flows.

The Mother Tree Project, established in 2015, investigates how retaining large trees and protecting below-ground connections can influence forest recovery after harvesting and disturbance. The project examines different levels of tree retention across climatic gradients in British Columbia, with attention to seedling survival, forest resilience and climate adaptation. This matters because forestry is entering a period of heightened uncertainty. Wildfire, drought, insect outbreaks and climate-driven stress are altering regeneration patterns across many regions. If old trees and fungal networks improve seedling establishment, then forest management focused solely on above-ground timber yield may miss key drivers of long-term ecosystem recovery.

Canadian science with global reach

Simard’s work has had particular resonance because it emerged from Canada’s forest landscapes, especially British Columbia’s mixed forests. Canada holds vast forest resources, and decisions about harvesting, replanting and conservation carry consequences for ecosystems, rural economies, Indigenous stewardship, biodiversity and carbon accounting.

Her research has also become globally influential because it speaks to a broader rethinking of ecology. Forests are increasingly understood as dynamic networks involving trees, fungi, bacteria, wildlife, soil chemistry, hydrology and climate feedbacks. This systems view is relevant not only to Canadian forestry but also to restoration projects in Europe, tropical reforestation, agroforestry and carbon-market planning.

At the same time, the field remains scientifically active and sometimes contested. Some researchers have questioned how far evidence for common mycorrhizal networks should be generalised, especially when popular accounts imply intentional tree communication. Simard and colleagues responded in 2025 that decades of peer-reviewed research support the existence and ecological relevance of common mycorrhizal networks, while acknowledging the need for careful interpretation and further study.

One reason the science is economically important is carbon. Forest carbon accounting has traditionally focused heavily on trunks, branches, leaves and soils. Yet mycorrhizal fungi are central to moving plant-derived carbon below ground and shaping whether this carbon is stored, respired or stabilised in soil. Recent ecological research suggests that mycorrhizal associations influence both above-ground biomass carbon and soil carbon dynamics. Different fungal partnerships, such as ectomycorrhizal and arbuscular mycorrhizal associations, appear to support different carbon and nutrient pathways.

This has practical implications for carbon markets and climate policy. If forest restoration or harvesting strategies damage fungal networks, they may reduce long-term carbon storage or impair regeneration. Conversely, practices that retain older trees, protect soil structure, maintain species diversity and support fungal health could improve carbon outcomes. For Canada, this links directly to economic opportunity. Better understanding of mycorrhizal systems could support more credible forest-carbon projects, improved restoration protocols, climate-resilient forestry and innovation in soil-carbon monitoring.

The first opportunity lies in regenerative forestry. Instead of treating forests as timber inventories, management can be designed around maintaining ecological function. Retention forestry, mixed-species planting, protection of old-growth remnants and reduced soil disturbance may all help preserve the biological infrastructure that supports forest recovery.

The second opportunity concerns forest restoration services. As governments and companies invest in restoring degraded landscapes, there is growing demand for evidence-based methods that improve seedling survival and ecosystem resilience. Simard’s work suggests that successful restoration may require attention not only to which tree species are planted but also to the existing fungal networks and legacy trees that help new growth establish.

The third opportunity is carbon finance. Carbon offset schemes increasingly need stronger evidence that claimed carbon gains are durable and ecologically credible. Incorporating fungal network health, soil-carbon dynamics and forest resilience into project design could improve the credibility of forest-based carbon programmes.

The fourth opportunity is agriculture and agroforestry. Although Simard’s best-known work concerns forest trees, mycorrhizal fungi also matter in farming systems. There is growing interest in practices that protect soil fungi, reduce excessive disturbance and improve nutrient cycling. Canadian agricultural discussions increasingly connect fungal networks with soil health and carbon management.

The next stage of development will depend heavily on measurement. Forest managers and investors need tools that can assess fungal diversity, soil carbon, root connectivity, seedling establishment and ecosystem resilience. Advances in DNA sequencing, isotopic tracing, remote sensing, machine learning and soil analytics could turn previously invisible fungal processes into measurable management indicators. This creates space for Canadian innovation. A country with major forestry, agriculture and climate-technology sectors is well positioned to develop practical tools for below-ground ecosystem assessment. The business opportunity is not simply selling trees or carbon credits; it is building the scientific infrastructure for resilient land stewardship.