Showing posts sorted by date for query ZOO. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query ZOO. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Sunday, July 26, 2026

 

More than half of the world's migratory bird species are declining, new global study finds



International team of scientists calls for a new approach to biodiversity conservation as losses span continents, oceans, and political boundaries




Georgetown University Medical Center






(JULY 23, 2026) WASHINGTON, D.C. — More than half of the world's migratory bird species are declining according to a major new review led by researchers from Georgetown University, the Smithsonian’s National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute, and a global collaboration of ornithologists.

Published in Nature Reviews Biodiversity, the paper provides the most comprehensive global assessment of migratory bird population status, threats, and conservation approaches, and presents a new framework for reversing population declines. The review synthesizes decades of research, international monitoring efforts, global biodiversity databases, and conservation agreements to identify what scientists know, where major knowledge gaps remain, and what actions are needed to reverse declines before more species become threatened with extinction.

The findings point to a broader challenge facing global biodiversity conservation. Because migratory animals, including birds, move across continents, oceans, and political boundaries throughout their annual cycles, they depend on interconnected networks of breeding grounds, migration stopover sites, and non-breeding habitats. As a result, they face a complex and often overlapping set of threats throughout their lives, making them among the most difficult groups of animals to conserve.

The authors estimate that approximately 51% of migratory bird species are declining globally across every major flyway on Earth. While nearly 300 migratory species are already considered globally threatened, many once-common and widespread birds are also experiencing substantial population losses, underscoring the scale of the biodiversity crisis.

"The scale of migratory bird declines is both alarming and sobering," said Peter P. Marra, Dean of Georgetown University's Earth Commons Institute and co-lead author of the study. "What we're seeing is the predictable consequence of decades of environmental degradation. Yet these declines are not inevitable. This review goes beyond documenting the crisis by identifying the major threats, highlighting the critical knowledge gaps, and providing a science-based framework for reversing declines before more species are pushed toward extinction."

Migratory birds are among the most visible and widespread components of global biodiversity. They help regulate insect populations, disperse seeds and pollinate plants, and support food webs across ecosystems and continents. They are also one of the primary ways people connect with nature, with millions of birdwatchers and community scientists around the world contributing observations to global databases that have become essential for understanding bird populations and informing conservation action.

Yet understanding exactly where and why populations are declining, and which of the world’s 11,000 bird species should be considered migratory, remains a challenge. Scientists are increasingly using advances in tracking technology, community science initiatives such as eBird, AI-enabled acoustic monitoring, and population modeling to identify migration routes, understand how populations are connected across seasons, and uncover the drivers of decline, including habitat loss, climate change, invasive species, collisions with buildings and infrastructure, disease, and pesticide use. The authors argue that reversing declines will require conservation strategies that address these threats across entire migratory lifecycles and international flyways rather than in isolation.

"Previous analyses have brought global attention to the fact that North American and European migratory birds are declining at alarming rates," said Nathan W. Cooper of Smithsonian’s National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute and co-lead author of the study. “But, until now, we did not have a good assessment about how birds are doing across all of the global terrestrial and marine flyways.”

The review outlines a framework for reversing declines that includes expanding monitoring and scientific understanding, strengthening conservation social science, protecting critical habitats, reducing major threats, and increasing international cooperation. It calls for integrating ecological and social sciences to develop conservation solutions that are effective locally and scalable across countries, cultures, economies, and governance systems.

One example of this approach is Road to Recovery, a science-based initiative co-founded by Marra and now housed at Georgetown University. The initiative coordinates a hemispheric response to identify the factors limiting populations and implement targeted conservation actions before species become threatened by combining advances in science and technology with the human dimensions of species conservation.

The researchers stress that despite the concerning trends, species-focused conservation initiatives have a proven record of success. Past efforts have helped recover waterfowl, cranes, shorebirds, and raptors once on the brink of extinction. The challenge, they argue, is scaling those successes to match the geographic scope and complexity of migratory birds.

"These declines are not inevitable," Marra said. "We know conservation works. This review shows that we have the scientific knowledge needed to reverse many of these declines. The challenge now is bringing together the partnerships, resources, and political and public commitment to implement those solutions at the scale migratory birds require."

Thursday, July 16, 2026

 

Medical School research team receives $10 Million NIH grant to study how animals fight infection





University of Minnesota Medical School






MINNEAPOLIS/ST. PAUL (7/15/2026) — A University of Minnesota Medical School research team received a 5-year, $10 million grant from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases to discover new ways that animals fight virus infections. This has the potential to be translated into novel therapies against emerging viruses in humans. 

To fight an infection, all cells use their innate immune systems to detect and respond to viruses. These innate immune defense strategies can vary significantly across animal species. Differences in how species naturally defend themselves against viral infections have major implications for understanding how viruses spread from animals to humans. These differences also affect the health of animal populations, including livestock and other agriculturally important species.

Through collaborations with the University of Minnesota College of Veterinary Medicine, the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Como Zoo Conservatory and San Diego Zoo, the research team has already built a collection of living cells from over 100 animal species to utilize this innate immune diversity. 

“This new grant will allow us to utilize this ‘cellular zoo’ to determine how diverse animals recognize and fight virus infections,” said Ryan Langlois, PhD, a professor at the University of Minnesota Medical School and the project’s leader.  

The research will initially focus on arboviruses, which are a group of viruses spread by insects such as mosquitoes and ticks that cause disease in people. One of the viruses that will be studied is West Nile virus. In 2025, Minnesota reported its highest number of human West Nile virus cases and deaths on record. The research will examine how animals naturally respond to West Nile virus and other arboviruses to better understand how these viruses spread and cause disease.

“This research will reveal how natural immune defenses differ across species and how those differences influence whether emerging viruses can spread to humans,” said Michael Gale, Jr., chair of the Medical School’s Department of Microbiology and Immunology and director of the University of Minnesota Institute on Infectious Diseases (UMIID). “By studying these natural defenses across species, we hope to identify new ways to prevent and treat viral diseases. This work reflects UMIID’s One Health approach, which recognizes that the health of people, animals and our shared environment are closely connected.”

This work was supported by UMIID and helps to further its mission of responding to and mitigating emerging infectious disease outbreaks.

###

About the University of Minnesota Medical School
The University of Minnesota Medical School is at the forefront of learning and discovery, transforming medical care and educating the next generation of physicians. Our graduates and faculty produce high-impact biomedical research and advance the practice of medicine. We acknowledge that the U of M Medical School is located on traditional, ancestral and contemporary lands of the Dakota and the Ojibwe, and scores of other Indigenous people, and we affirm our commitment to tribal communities and their sovereignty as we seek to improve and strengthen our relations with tribal nations. Learn more at med.umn.edu.

Wednesday, July 15, 2026

Trump’s GOP Is Ripping This Nation Apart. The Question Is: Why?

The morality of today’s Republican Party has been laid bare. But it boggles the mind the depth of this destruction and cruelty.


President Donald Trump is destroying the nation like a crazed maniac. Does anyone really understand what motivates him or the party he controls.
(Cartoon: AI generated via The Hartmann Report)

Thom Hartmann
Jul 14, 2026
Common Dreams

Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill — which gave the top 1% fully $118 billion this year in tax cuts — turns a year old this week and Republicans in Congress actually celebrated the largest cuts to food assistance and Medicaid in American history.

They told us it was about fraud, about lazy people gaming the system, about restoring the dignity of work. Exactly a year later we can now see what it was really about in a line of cars outside a food bank in Phoenix.

That’s where ProPublica found Ana Alvarez on a recent morning, a single mother of five who works at a restaurant and lost her family’s SNAP benefits last September. She reapplied in December and the government still hasn’t processed her application.

She calls the agency every week and gets told to keep waiting, so she clips coupons, her kids don’t go to the zoo anymore, and as the summer heat bears down she’s doing grim arithmetic on rent, the car payment, and the electric bill that keeps the air conditioning running. She’s one reason Arizona has lost more than half of its SNAP recipients in a single year.

In Michigan, a widow named Sarah works two food service jobs to raise her 9-year-old daughter on $219 a month in food assistance, help she’s needed since her husband died suddenly six years ago. Last Christmas one of her employers wrote a single number wrong on her renewal paperwork, one missing zero, and the state cut her off.

And in Atlanta, Human Rights Watch documented a 36-year-old supermarket cashier who was working and meeting every requirement until she gave birth in late 2025, at which point Georgia shut off both her Medicaid and her food stamps, claiming she’d failed to report the job she was standing at every day. She’s spent the months since trying to get her coverage back while the medical bills pile up. In the party of family values, apparently, having a baby is now a firing offense.

None of these women are cheats or freeloaders. They’re workers, mothers, widows: exactly the people these cynical Republicans swear they’re protecting. But the numbers tell the story: more than 4 million Americans have been pushed off SNAP since the bill passed, the steepest drop since Clinton’s 1996 welfare cuts, and in just the 13 states that publish the data, roughly 808,000 children have lost food assistance.

The Congressional Budget Office projects millions more will lose Medicaid as the work requirement paperwork machine grinds through the states, even though more than nine in ten of the people targeted are already working, in school, caring for family, or disabled.

The cruelty built into the bill isn’t a side effect: it’s the whole reason for the “enhanced” paperwork requirements. Every mother who gives up in frustration, every widow tripped up by a typo, every application left to rot in a backlog is a line item of savings that can translate into a larger tax cut for Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, and Mark Zuckerberg while the poorest households actually see their taxes go up.

That’s the morality of today’s GOP laid bare. They looked at Ana Alvarez’s five kids and Sarah’s daughter and that new mother in Atlanta, and they decided the billionaires needed the money more.

Every day, it seems, we see or hear about another way in which Trump and his lickspittles in Congress and the various federal agencies are tearing down our country, weakening our defenses, pitting Americans against each other, looting our government, and making life harder for everybody except the morbidly rich.

The question nobody seems to have an answer to is, “Why?”

— Is it that, as Craig Unger seems to suggest, that Trump’s been a Russian agent for decades and is setting us up to lose to the newly-forming Axis of Russia and China?
— Is it that he spent so many years burning with rage and embarrassment at not being accepted by New York high society that he’s just come to hate America?
— Could it be that American-values-hating foreign powers that have poured literally billions of dollars into the Trump family are paying him to tear us apart so they’ll never again have to endure the humiliation of having their human, civil, and women’s rights records called out by a future administration?
— Is it possible it’s all just to pay for tax cuts for billionaires?
— Or are his, Vance’s, and Musk’s white supremacist, Christian nationalist, libertarian, and/or neo-Nazi ideologies so intense that they’re willing to essentially burn the country down just to expel immigrants, deny benefits to people of color, elevate the rich, crush unions, and re-subordinate women?

These are serious questions for which I can’t find credible answers that explain the entire spectrum of their behavior. Why would Trump and the GOP:

— Condemn 12 million Americans to sickness and early death by gutting Medicaid (and the biggest cuts don’t even kick in until right after this fall’s election)?
— Destroy American soft power by killing USAID, thus condemning millions to death?
— Fire so many workers at the Social Security Administration that just getting through to sign up or get help has turned into a multi-day slog?
— Gut the State Department at a time diplomacy is most needed for world peace?
— End food assistance (SNAP) for millions when one-in-five American children experience hunger?
— Refuse to enforce laws and rules that allow workers to form unions in their workplaces?
— Propose forcing all new Medicare recipients onto Medicare “Advantage” corporate scam plans?
— Refuse military aid to Ukraine for over a year to give Russia time to finish off their genocidal job?
— Stop the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau from going after fraudsters and banks when they rip people off?
— Eliminate a major NOAA program designed to warn communities about the dangers of flooding and other extreme weather crises?
— Politicize the FBI, the Department of Justice, and the Federal Election Commission?
— End net neutrality so none of us are safe online?
— Shut down anti-cyber-warfare operations in the federal government?
— Defund university research that leads to innovation and saves lives?
— Cut unemployment insurance benefits across Red states?
— Terminate support for people with student loans and gut scholarship programs?
— Slash Affordable Care Act outreach budgets and allow junk insurance plans?
— Reverse over 100 environmental rules, including those on clean air, clean water, and chemical safety?
— Weaken Dodd-Frank, including gutting oversight of “too big to fail” banks and stress tests for mid-size financial institutions?
— Dial back OSHA workplace safety standards and inspections?
— Cut taxes to rich people while raising them via tariffs on working class folks?
— Change the Federal Trade Commission to allow more monopolistic, rip-off corporate behavior?
— Make it harder to vote and harass Blue states by demanding their voter information?
— Work to prosecute women who have miscarriages or abortions?
— Make it harder to qualify for Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) and Supplemental Security Income (SSI)?
— End auto emission standards and increase our reliance on fossil fuels?
— Pack the courts with judges the American Bar Association says are “unqualified”?
— Destroy our faith in our elections and set up election workers for harassment?
— Fire the Inspectors General (who find waste, fraud, and abuse) across multiple federal agencies?
— Weaken whistleblower protections?
— Put the military on the streets of our cities in violation of Posse Comitatus?
— Use state power to punish political opponents and those who’ve investigated Trump’s crimes, alleged Russian collusion, and corruption?
— Create a network of concentration camps across America?
— Allow a shadow cabinet of billionaires and theocrats via Project 2025?
— Attack judges and prosecutors, leading to violence and threats of violence?
— Foment violence (like on January 6th) as a political strategy?
— Destroy our asylum and refugee systems?
— Pardon insurrectionists, rapists, cybercriminals, and other wealthy criminals?
— Defund the IRS so they can no longer audit the morbidly rich, leading to the loss of hundreds of billions in federal revenues?
— Ban books and censor libraries?
— Criminalize trans and queer people?
— Roll back gun safety measures?
— Defund the arts, humanities, and public media?
— Gut vaccine and other programs that keep Americans healthy?
— Nakedly politicize the military?
— Expand federal surveillance powers while kneecapping oversight?
— Criminalize free speech, particularly on college campuses?
— Attempt to revoke birthright citizenship?
— Attack press freedom and bar the Associated Press from the White House?
— Sabotage the US Postal Service?
— Undermine the census?
— Scale back civil and women’s rights enforcement?
— Normalize autocratic language like “vermin,” “scum,” and calling immigrants “animals”?
— Expel millions of brown-skinned immigrants who’ve already gone through the legal process to get work permits and are on a path toward citizenship?
— Create international fiscal chaos with an on-again, off-again TACO tariff policy?
— Cancel the suicide hotline for queer kids?
— Gut our national parks and sell off our federal lands to wealthy friends of the administration?
— Create a vast, secret, unaccountable police force with masked officers whose identity is concealed?
— Allow the president to accept hundreds of millions in obvious bribes from foreign powers in violation of the Constitution?
— Work so hard to conceal the crimes of a notorious sexual predator?

And this, of course, is just a partial list of the ways Trump and the GOP have weakened our nation, reduced our standing and prestige in the world, corrupted our government, and immiserated working class families.

Many of the theories about why Trump and the GOP would enthusiastically do so much damage to our people, our military, and our democracy contradict others.

For example, why would billionaires want tax cuts at the expense of damaging the economy that made them rich? Why would we promote a muscular military policy like bombing Iran while simultaneously destroying morale within the ranks of our military and kneecapping our intelligence agencies?

“Something is happening here but you don’t know what it is,” sang Bob Dylan back in the 1960s.

Today, we’re there.

Why do you think Trump and the GOP are working so hard to ruin our country?



Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

Thom Hartmann
Thom Hartmann is a talk-show host and the author of "The Hidden History of Monopolies: How Big Business Destroyed the American Dream" (2020); "The Hidden History of the Supreme Court and the Betrayal of America" (2019); and more than 25 other books in print.
Full Bio >

Tuesday, July 14, 2026

 

Fates of famous problem-solving chimps revealed



New paper details the lives, deaths and rediscovered remains of the apes tested in Wolfgang Köhler’s landmark studies of ape intelligence




University of Auckland

Dr Javier Virués-Ortega 

image: 

Dr Javier Virués-Ortega

view more 

Credit: University of Auckland/Dr Javier Virués-Ortega





A University of Auckland scientist has uncovered the fates of chimpanzees who starred in seminal psychological studies of the early 20th Century.

`The Fate of Sultan’s Clan’, by psychologist Dr Javier Virués-Ortega, was published in the journal European Psychologist.

“These chimpanzees are usually remembered for what they revealed about the mind,” says Virués-Ortega. “We wanted to ask the historical question textbooks mostly leave out: what happened to the animals themselves?”

Captured in the wild as juveniles, the chimpanzees were studied by German psychologist Wolfgang Köhler on Tenerife in the Canary Islands off North Africa from 1914 to 1920.

When chimpanzee Sultan fitted two bamboo sticks together to reach a banana outside his cage, Köhler was struck by tool-making and creative problem-solving skills akin to those of humans.

Likewise, the chimpanzees would stack boxes to reach a banana too high to reach. In other experiments, they used long poles as makeshift climbing aids, carried out multi-step, goal-directed actions, and even climbed a door so they could swing closer to a piece of fruit.

In contemporary accounts, Virués-Ortega found references to some of these experiments being reenacted by the apes years later in Berlin, offering rare anecdotal evidence of long-term memory in great apes.

Köhler’s work laid a foundation for the field of comparative psychology, where scientists study the behaviour of non-human animals, and his research still features in textbooks.

Jane Goodall, the famed primatologist, described Köhler’s book The Mentality of Apes, with its close observations of the animals’ behaviour, as her Bible.

But what of the fates of the animals themselves?

When the research centre closed down, six surviving chimpanzees – females Rana, Chica, Grande, Tercera, and Tschego and a male, Sultan – were transported to Europe by steamship. After a two-week journey in individual cages, they were rehoused in the Berlin Zoological Gardens.

The animals were already celebrities because of Köhler’s research and their arrival was a much-anticipated event. According to news reports, the primates “hugged each other” on being released from their travel crates, in a touching reunion scene.

Virués-Ortega studied zoo and museum records, newspaper accounts, personal correspondence and biological samples to reconstruct what happened next.

On Tenerife, treatment of the chimpanzees had been humane by the standards of the time. They had access to an outdoors playground, interactions with humans were limited as much as possible, and the climate was suitable.

While the zoo in Berlin had agreed to avoid circus-type training, a newspaper report from 1921 described one of the female chimpanzees begging for a cigarette, then expertly puffing on it “like a woman of today”.

Born in Cameroon, the animals were totally unsuited to harsh Berlin winters and the zoo often lacked sufficient heating because of post-World War I economic hardship. During the winter of 1921 to 1922, Berlin endured more than 50 sub-zero days, including 19 days below –10C; three female chimpanzees died that winter.

Fresh fruits and vegetables were in short supply, leaving a starchy and unsuitable diet big on potatoes and bread. The chimpanzees no longer had a large space to play and interact.

One account described Sultan’s last months as “lonely and joyless”. The animals were still research subjects, but little meaningful research occurred.   

Clutching at blankets to ward off sub-zero temperatures, the animals began falling ill and within three years all were dead. The study suggests cold, inadequate diet, pregnancy, social upheaval, and illness may have converged to undermine their health. Their expected lifespans were cut short by 20 years or more.

A male infant named Kaspar, born at the zoo in 1921, lost the use of an arm after he managed to get out of an enclosure and his mother, Rana, pulled him back in. His arm was caught between the bars and crushed, according to contemporary reports.

Orphaned by Rana’s death, Kaspar was transferred to a Berlin children’s hospital where he was bottle-fed human breast milk and cows’ milk. His stricken arm was amputated.

German psychologist Oskar Pfungst, known for debunking feats of intelligence by a horse named Clever Hans, studied Kaspar to assess the chimpanzee’s `natural’ behaviour when isolated from other chimpanzees. But what was interpreted at the time as natural primate behaviour was probably shaped by trauma and social deprivation. In 1924, Kaspar died of the same dysentery-type disease which had claimed his elders.

Virués-Ortega has rediscovered six of the chimpanzees’ remains in a Berlin museum’s storage, where they had lain for decades, unrecognised by staff, among hundreds of thousands of specimens. DNA samples extracted from the remains have been found to be viable. In the future, analysis could clarify how Sultan’s clan was related to contemporary chimpanzee populations in West Africa.


Collaborators in the research include:

Dr Clemens Maier-Wolthausen, Federal Chancellery, Berlin

Dr Alex Taylor, University of Auckland, New Zealand

David García Gonzalez, Universidad de Granada, Spain

 

Collaborators in ongoing DNA studies include:

Dr Tomas Marques-Bonet, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona

Dr Olga Feliu, Mona Foundation, Barcelona

Argentina court recognizes two goldfish as sentient beings with rights

Sol Amaya, 
CNN
Mon, July 13, 2026 


Magui and Fede settled in very well in their new home. - Federico Sordo/Jaulas Vacías Sanctuary

On the facade of a sushi restaurant in a chic Buenos Aires neighborhood, two goldfish in a glass display case would go largely unnoticed apart from the occasional child who would tap against the glass.

One day, someone took a closer look at the tank, which was exposed to the sun and street noise. It would change the fate of the pair of small fish, named Fede and Magui, who were later recognized in an Argentine court as sentient beings that had rights.

"Anyone passing by and stopping to look could see it wasn't suitable for the fish," said Matías Trufero, lawyer for the NGO Jaulas Vacías, an anti-speciesism sanctuary that houses more than 200 rescued animals.

He said that's why Jaulas Vacías (Empty Cages), decided to file a complaint with the courts, arguing that the conditions of these fish violated Law 14.346, which penalizes animal abuse in Argentina.

With the help of specialists, they built a legal case and almost immediately convinced the court to move the fish to a more suitable place.

Trufero, the main promoter of this change, said the restaurant staff did not object to the ruling. CNN has contacted the restaurant for comment.

Having two fish in a glass display case is "more or less the same as putting two polar bears in a cage inside a sauna," said Carlos José Aga, one of the specialists who helped with the rescue and offered to adopt them.

Magui and Fede were moved from their 40-liter display case and into a 2,500-liter fish tank at Aga's house. The court ruled that the fish would remain in the care of their adopter.

"Fish are like astronauts, they travel in their own environment with careful monitoring of all their vital parameters, and when they arrive at the place, those conditions must be reproduced with great accuracy to avoid imbalances that could lead to a decrease in their immunity," Aga explained.

"Now they are doing very well," he said.

But rescuing the fish was only part of the process.

'Sentient beings'



Courtesy of Carlos José Aga

"At the beginning of the case, we requested that, in addition to removing the fish to a safe and suitable location, they be declared subjects of law," or "sentient beings," Trufero explained.

In other words, they wanted the fish to stop being recognized merely as "objects" under the law and become beings with rights.

Such a ruling sets a precedent for similar animals in inadequate conditions to lead a dignified life.

For anyone wondering if it's illegal to keep goldfish at home, Trufero said the answer depends on the situation.

"It's not illegal per se to keep a fish in a fish tank. However, it is illegal to keep them in conditions that cause mistreatment or cruelty. For example, inadequate space, insufficient food, and other acts punishable by law," Trufero said about the legislation in Argentina.

"Furthermore, if it's an exotic species, keeping could be prohibited if it falls under local wildlife laws," regulations that also exist in many other countries, he said.
From orangutans to fish

The first habeas corpus petition filed on behalf of a non-human animal was in 2005 for Suiza, a chimpanzee in Brazil, who died before being transferred to a sanctuary.

From then on, similar cases began to occur in other countries, including Argentina. One of the best known was that of Sandra, an orangutan born in Germany who lived in the Buenos Aires Zoo for 20 years until 2014, when she was declared a "non-human person" by a judge thanks to legal action brought by environmentalists.

The ruling held that her captivity and exhibition violated her rights, even though she was well fed and did not suffer mistreatment.

In 2016, the Buenos Aires Zoo was transformed into an eco-park, removing animals from display and relocating many of them to sanctuaries. Sandra was sent to the Center of Great Apes in Wauchula, Florida, in 2019.

"The importance of declaring these animals subjects of law lies in the fact that they cease to be considered a thing, an object," Trufero explained.

In cases of cruelty and mistreatment, they can be considered victims and not things, which radically changes the way the future of animals is defined.

The case of Fede and Magui opens a door for these types of fish, very common in homes and businesses, to be legally protected.

"A subject with a legal right can do little or nothing for themselves unless there are people who speak on behalf of those who cannot speak and enforce the law," Aga emphasized, adding that Fede and Magui have already settled into their new home.

Michael Rios contributed to this story.


Tuesday, June 30, 2026

Remains of people exhibited in ‘human zoos’ to be returned to French Guiana

In 1892, around 30 men, women and children from the Kali’na and Arawak peoples of French Guiana were brought to Paris to be put on display at "human zoos". Six of them did not survive the winter. A bill allowing the repatriation of their remains to their homeland has now received final approval – the culmination of a long struggle waged by their descendants.



Issued on: 28/06/2026 - RFI

A shaman travelled from French Guiana to hold a spiritual ceremony for the six Arawak and Kali’na Indigenous people on 17 September, 2024 at the Musée de l’Homme in Paris. © Arame Mbengue / RFI


The remains were initially buried and then later exhumed for scientific study, and have been held at the National Museum of Natural History in Paris ever since.

On 15 June, the National Assembly gave final approval to a bill already passed by the Senate allowing for the removal of the remains from public collections, which are usually inalienable, making it legally possible to return them to their community.

Martin Friess, head of the biological anthropology collections at the Museum of Mankind, part of the National Museum of Natural History, showed RFI six large grey boxes stacked on top of one another in a climate-controlled storeroom at the museum.

"Inside are the human remains of the six individuals. They were brought to France for the 1892 World’s Fair, where they were exhibited in the Jardin d’Acclimatation's 'human zoo'," he said.

These six people died in the same year.

"Most were buried and were exhumed in 1897, at which point they were transferred to the collections of the National Museum of Natural History," Friess explained.

"So we had these boxes made specifically for these individuals, because they are more or less complete skeletons that have been mounted – that is to say, articulated – which was the practice in the 19th century, mainly to facilitate exhibitions. They are assembled as if they were standing upright."

'A blessed and historic year'

For their descendants, the final vote at the National Assembly on 15 June marks 2026 as a historic year.

"It’s an exceptional year. A year which, I think, resonates with everyone’s memories, as it’s also the year of the Taubira Law," says Corinne Toka-Devilliers, chair of the Moliko Alet+po campaign group, referring to the law enacted in 2001 which made made France the first country in the world to officially classify the slave trade as a crime against humanity. This law was spearheaded by Christiane Taubira, an MP from French Guiana.

"So 2026 is truly a blessed and historic year, in every sense of the word, for the overseas territories, for the DOM-TOMs, for the local authorities and for French Guiana."

France confronts enduring legacy of slavery, 25 years on from Taubira Law

Corinne Toka-Devilliers stands before the remains of her ancestors during the spiritual ceremony held in September 2024. © Arame Mbengue / RFI

A shamanic ceremony was held in September 2024 at the museum to soothe the souls of the six people and prepare for their return.

This will take place in three stages, explained Toka-Devilliers.

"It will begin with an official ceremony at the Elysée Palace, as announced to us by the adviser to the president of the Republic.

"Next, there will be a ceremony on arrival at Félix Éboué Airport in Cayenne, and afterwards they will be taken to their burial site where a vigil will be held, in accordance with our ancestral Kali’na and Arawak culture, so that the following day they may finally find their final resting place and eternal rest."

This article has been adapted from the original version in French by Arame Mbengue.