Showing posts sorted by date for query greta. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query greta. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Thursday, October 15, 2026

 

'Oxford Handbook of Climate Action' rounds up a world's worth of ideas and expertise




Book brings discussion up to date through more than 60 environmental and climate scholars




University of California - Merced






Climate change is a global crisis and the search for solutions is increasingly technological. A new 700-page volume from Oxford University Press demonstrates that moving people, institutions and communities to act may be just as consequential.

Sociology and environmental systems Professor Paul Almeida from the University of California, Merced has edited “The Oxford Handbook of Climate Action,” a reference work that gathers 39 chapters from over 60 top environmental and climate scholars around the world. The book serves as a starting point for readers who want to understand how climate action happens and the forms it takes, whether they're picking up the handbook in Merced or Nairobi.

That worldwide reach is by design. Earlier climate handbooks were written during a prior wave of climate action in the 2000s and 2010s. This current collection updates climate action into the second quarter of the 21st century. All the chapters were written in the last two years and grapple with today's political context, such as climate change denialism, along with new technologies such as carbon capture and storage.

What sets the handbook apart, Almeida said, is its emphasis on combining human-based solutions with emerging climate technologies rather than purely technical ones. Climate change won't be solved by clean energy alone, he said.

"We need to comprehend the social and economic structures that sustain a fossil-fuel-based society and the human-based incentives necessary to transition to a green economy," Almeida said.

“How does the new generation of renewable energy systems and climate technologies benefit frontline communities without reproducing existing systems of stratification and inequality? What kinds of social safety nets can we envision by working with communities and workers in the largest societal transformation since the Industrial Revolution?”

The handbook is organized around three themes:

  • The major theoretical perspectives driving the field of climate action

  • Institutional strategies such as renewable energy, reforestation, carbon capture and climate action planning

  • Grassroots action such as mobilized social movements

A fourth layer of regional chapters spans nearly every part of the globe, from Asia and Africa to Latin America. The contributing scholars affiliate with an impressive array of international institutions, initiatives and organizations including:

  • Middle East Council on Global Affairs (Qatar)

  • Asian Institute of Technology (Thailand)

  • LDC Universities’ Consortium on Climate Change (Bangladesh/Uganda)

  • Centre for Climate and Resilience Research (Chile)

  • Institute of Environmental Science and Technology (Spain)

  • South Korean Ministry of Climate, Energy and Environment (South Korea)

  • Indian Council of Social Sciences Research (India)

  • Heidelberg University Center for the Environment (Germany)

  • OGCI China Climate Investments (China)

  • Global Carbon Capture and Storage Institute (Australia)

Among the chapters Almeida points to is one on 350.org, the organization that helped build the modern global climate movement years before Greta Thunberg and the Fridays for Future youth-based protests. The chapter is written by three of the group's founders, who organized as students of author and activist Bill McKibben at Vermont's Middlebury College in the mid-2000s before taking their work international.

Almeida co-authored the introductory chapter with current and former UC Merced graduate students. The chapter classifies how different forms of climate change threats induce climate action.

The handbook grew out of Almeida's own climate-based research. After finishing a solo book on climate action, “Climate Change and Civic Engagement,” he guided the Oxford collective volume through several rounds of review. The solo book, also published this year, focuses more on the United States and California — with a chapter dedicated to the San Joaquin Valley — and is grounded in his scholarly background of implementing in-person representative surveys with community partners and the UC Merced Community and Labor Center on basic climate needs in thousands of households in disinvested census tracts throughout the region.

For UC Merced, the timing of the books fit well with a broader push. In 2022, California Assembly Bill 179 directed about $18 million toward climate action research at the university, with roughly $9 million awarded to UC Merced faculty through competitive grants.

The university sits in the heart of the San Joaquin Valley, a region marked by extreme heat, a large outdoor workforce and some of the state's least developed climate action planning — a combination Almeida argues makes it a priority for the kind of social science expertise and research the handbook collects.

Colleagues have taken note. "Almeida's edited volume highlights why the social sciences are indispensable for addressing planetary warming, from understanding human behavior to increasing public participation in climate action," said Gillian Wilson, UC Merced vice chancellor for research, innovation and economic development.

Leo Arriola, dean of the School of Social Sciences, Humanities and Arts, called the handbook "an essential public good.”

"It reminds us that technological innovation alone is not enough to address the climate crises already felt around the world," Arriola said. "Almeida's handbook provides insights to understanding how people can work together and with their institutions to bring about lasting change."

Saturday, October 10, 2026

 

Zelenskyy hits out at 'gifts to Putin' after Trump announces deal for Russian diesel

President Donald Trump meets with Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy during the United Nations General Assembly, Tuesday, Sept. 22, 2026.
Copyright AP Photo

By Greta Ruffino
Updated

US President Donald Trump said on Friday that Russian leader Vladimir Putin had agreed to release diesel into US and global markets.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has hit out at what he called "gifts to Putin" after the US announced a deal to buy Russian diesel.

US President Donald Trump said on Friday that Russian President Vladimir Putin had agreed to release diesel into US and global markets, a move he said would help ease soaring energy costs amid the war with Iran.

"Russia will immediately supply over 300,000 tons of Diesel Fuel to the American and Global Marketplace, another 500,000 tons during the month of November," Trump said following talks with Putin.

Responding to the announcement in a post on X, Zelenskyy wrote: "Gifts to Putin will not bring peace or any benefit to the civilized world."

"Allowing Russia to sell petroleum products is an investment in a war that must be ended, not prolonged. What is needed is real de-escalation with Russia on a reciprocal basis," he added.

The US Treasury Department also said it was issuing a temporary licence allowing Russian diesel to enter global markets.

The White House did not immediately clarify who would pay for the Russian diesel or when supplies under the agreement would become available. It also did not say whether further deliveries expected next month would arrive before the 3 November midterm elections.

Trump's announcement comes just a month after he signed sweeping sanctions against Russia aimed at targeting its energy sector and other industries helping finance its war in Ukraine.

The move raises questions over whether the White House will impose further sanctions on Russia this month, as required by bipartisan legislation targeting major importers of Russian oil and gas.

Trump made no mention of the sanctions or Russia's war in Ukraine, instead saying: “Lower prices for Americans, especially our Great Farmers, Ranchers, and Truckers, is my Greatest Priority.”

Russian presidential envoy Kirill Dmitriev reposted the Treasury Department’s announcement on X Friday and said that “Russia-US cooperation on diesel and energy will benefit the world.”



Trump strikes diesel deal with Putin, reversing years of pressure on Russia over Ukraine war

US President Donald Trump said Friday that Russia had agreed to immediately supply more than 300,000 tonnes of diesel to US and global markets in an effort to cut fuel prices before November's midterm elections. The move marks a stunning change of policy after the US and its allies hit Russia with waves of sanctions over its invasion of Ukraine.


Issued on: 09/10/2026 - 
By:FRANCE 24


The US president said he struck the deal with Putin in a phone call in which he was expected to discuss a suspected case of plague in Russia. © Jim Watson, Kristina Solovyova, AFP


US President Donald Trump said that he has struck a deal to obtain diesel from Russia, a stunning reversal of years of US pressure on Moscow over its war with Ukraine and an attempt to address high fuel prices ahead of the US midterm elections.

Trump said on social media on Friday that he struck the deal with Russian President Vladimir Putin in a phone call in which he was expected to discuss a suspected case of plague in Russia. Instead, Trump announced that Russia will immediately supply more than 300,000 tonnes of diesel, followed by an additional 500,000 tonnes in November and 1 million tonnes “immediately thereafter.” Russia will deliver another 3 million tonnes “within a short period of time” after that, he wrote.

Trump’s shocking announcement comes after he signed a sweeping Russia sanctions law last month that aimed at clamping down on Russia’s energy economy, among other areas, that fuel its war against Ukraine.

His move casts doubt on the likelihood of the White House imposing sanctions on Russia this month, given that a bipartisan law passed by Congress directs the administration to target the top importers of Russian oil and gas.

Trump, in his announcement, did not address the sanctions or Russia’s war but said, “Lower prices for Americans, especially our Great Farmers, Ranchers, and Truckers, is my Greatest Priority.”

The White House did not immediately respond to questions about who was paying for the diesel from Russia and when the fuel being supplied under the agreement would become available. It also did not clarify whether subsequent supplies of Russian diesel set to come next month would be supplied prior to Election Day on November 3.

Russian presidential envoy Kirill Dmitriev reposted the Treasury Department’s announcement on X Friday and said that “Russia-US cooperation on diesel and energy will benefit the world”.

The law Trump signed last month envisions sanctions on Russian officials, banks and a shadow fleet of tankers and bans all new US investment in Russia and the handling of sovereign debt.

It also directed Trump to impose tariffs of up to 100% on the top five importers of Russian oil or natural gas, with an exception for countries that import less than 15% of Russia’s natural gas exports and have taken significant steps to reduce those imports.

The US has not imported Russian oil or gas since 2022, when the Biden administration banned them because of Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine, according to the US Energy Information Administration.

Shortly after Trump made the announcement, the Treasury Department said it was immediately issuing a temporary license allowing Russian diesel to be supplied to the global market.

Gas prices globally have surged as the war in Iran upends the energy sector. The national average for a gallon of diesel in the US was $6.23 on Friday, according to AAA, after hitting a record $6.52 on September 22.

(FRANCE 24 with AP)



EU paid €7.9bn for Russian Arctic LNG amid record imports




By Marta Pacheco
Published on

Continued Russian LNG imports undermine the credibility of the EU’s promise to sever its energy ties with Moscow, particularly as Russia continues its war against Ukraine.

Europe paid around €7.88 billion for liquefied natural gas (LNG) from Russia’s Arctic energy project in the first nine months of 2026 despite Brussels’ efforts to phase out gas from Moscow, according to the campaign group Urgewald.

The figures, compiled by Urgewald using data from the market intelligence firm Kpler, expose just how reliant the EU remains on Russian energy, with a record of 12.18 million tonnes reaching European ports between January and September this year.

The EU has been trying to wean itself off Russian energy for a while, and this year introduced a number of measures to end its reliance on Moscow. Brussels introduced a ban on new Russian energy contracts at the beginning of 2026, with a complete ban on Russian LNG taking effect on 1 January 2027.

Meanwhile, the Trump administration recently announced the Lindsey Graham Act, giving the US the power to sanction Russian LNG deliveries to Europe before the EU's import ban kicks in.

This comes at a time when Europe's gas storage levels are at a record low, and the bloc faces a brutal energy crisis, leaving Brussels increasingly vulnerable to decisions from Washington, the EU's major LNG supplier.

European LNG imports from the Russian Yamal project rose 9.5% year-on-year between January and September, with EU ports receiving 85% of Yamal’s recorded deliveries.

France received nearly three-quarters of September’s EU deliveries, with the Dunkirk and Montoir ports receiving 571.716 million tonnes of Arctic LNG, according to Kpler.

The Netherlands imported 146.461 million tonnes of LNG and Portugal 74.263 million tonnes. No cargoes were recorded in Spain or at Belgium’s Zeebrugge terminal.

The persistence of the Arctic LNG trade into Europe shows the difficulty of translating a long-term phase-out commitment into an immediate commercial break.

Ineffective short-term bans

The figures also raise questions about the effectiveness of the EU’s initial restrictions on Russian LNG.

A ban on imports under existing short-term contracts took effect on 25 April, but September deliveries reached 792,440 tonnes, slightly above the level a year earlier.

The EU’s full ban on Russian LNG under eligible existing long-term contracts is scheduled to take effect on 1 January 2027.

Until then, continued purchases generate revenue for Russia's war against Ukraine and expose the limits of restrictions that target some contracts without immediately stopping the wider trade.

"We have always assumed that the impact would not be particularly significant, since most of the export capacity is tied up in long-term contracts anyway," Sebastian Rötters, energy campaigner at Urgewald, told Euronews.

"In addition, export volumes are generally lower in the summer due to maintenance work at the terminal and LNG shipments to Asia via the Northern Sea Route," Rötters added.

The real litmus test for Yamal will be the EU’s phase-out starting in 2027, Rötters said, noting it may lead to noticeable reductions in exports due to the increased logistical challenges


Nina Lavrenteva / Liège University Yamal LNG project.


Call to strengthen 22nd sanctions package

The German-based NGO Urgewald is calling for the upcoming 22nd EU sanctions package to close loopholes, particularly those supporting the specialised Arc7 ice-class tanker fleet needed to transport LNG from the Arctic.

Yamal’s reliance on specialised vessels makes its export system vulnerable to restrictions on transport and associated services.

European ports are also geographically convenient destinations, allowing tankers to unload and return to the project relatively quickly.

Urgewald argues that disrupting those logistics could pile pressure on Russia’s ability to sustain Arctic LNG exports.

"The EU should not wait passively for the 2027 embargo to take effect. The next sanctions package should close the remaining loopholes, above all those that keep the indispensable Arc7 LNG tanker fleet operating. Washington, meanwhile, now has the power to sanction this trade at any time before then,” reads Urgewald's statement.

However, such measures would require political coordination among the EU and its member states and could complicate European gas procurement before the import ban takes effect and ahead of an unpredictable winter season.

The data provided does not establish how much of the trade could be redirected to other buyers or what the consequences would be for European gas prices, but any additional trade disruption on top of the loss of LNG from the Middle East would have an impact.

Trump gains another lever over the EU’s energy security

US sanctions under the Lindsey Graham Act could disrupt trade before the EU's ban on Russian LNG takes effect, forcing European governments and buyers to respond.

The US administration faces an 18 October deadline for its first review under the law. However, the deadline should not be mistaken for an automatic ban on Yamal deliveries, Urgewald say, as the law’s practical impact depends on how the administration exercises its powers.

"The US President must compile a list of ships transporting Russian LNG by October 18. These ships will then be subject to sanctions unless Trump issues so-called waivers. This is possible and, given Trump’s track record regarding Russia, not unlikely," Rötters told Euronews.

EU imports from Yamal will depend on the goodwill of the US President from 18 October until the final embargo takes effect in 2027, Rötters stressed.

US sanctions have already severely restricted Russia’s Arctic LNG 2 project and the Northern Sea Route, while Yamal LNG continues to supply Europe.

Data from Kpler shows that 706.473 million tonnes of LNG were destined for China, South Korea and Taiwan in September this year.

 


‘Nothing will stop us’: French student protests show few signs of ending



Students on Thursday barricaded a Parisian high school with garbage bins before police shot tear gas at them as France’s nationwide protests showed little sign of ending. At least a dozen demonstrations supporting the high school students’ movement were planned across the country while 375 schools were fully or partially closed.



Issued on: 08/10/2026 
By: FRANCE 24

Cover image: A student holds a placard reading "They don't care about us" in English during a protest against under-resourced schools in Paris on October 8, 2026. © Aurelien Morissard, AP
04:14




Students barricaded a high school in northeastern Paris with garbage bins on Thursday before police moved in with tear gas, as France’s nationwide protests showed few signs of ending.

The Hélène Boucher high school has been a flashpoint for clashes in the French capital and was one of hundreds of schools disrupted by protests Thursday. Riot police gathered in side streets as students converged on the school. Many protesters wore surgical masks or hoodies, apparently to avoid being recognized.

At least a dozen demonstrations supporting the high school students’ movement were planned across France later in the day, including a rally at Place de la Bastille in Paris, where tear gas and a water cannon were fired at protesters.

Police have made more than 6,600 arrests since late September, when students, most of them under 18, began protesting to demand more education funding, according to the interior ministry. The education ministry said 375 schools were fully or partially closed Thursday.
Pressure mounts on government

While the number of school closures was down compared to Tuesday, pressure is mounting on the government of outgoing President Emmanuel Macron.

The protests against the underfunding of schools – many of them struggling with dilapidated facilities and insufficient staff – have drawn troublemakers not concerned about the aims of the protest movement as well as unions and political groups.

In a TV address, Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu lamented the “violence, students and staff being attacked, police officers and gendarmes injured, schools set on fire or vandalized, thousands of hours of classes lost, not to mention threats and insults”.
High school student protests continue in France
Cover image: High school student protests continue in France © France 24
00:52

He took aim at “political leaders who use this anger to conduct their electoral battles”. France goes to the polls for a presidential election in April. “We cannot play with the safety of France’s youth”, Lecornu said.

At the lycée, 18-year-old university student Emma Khelil came to offer support to those at the barricades at her former high school. She told The Associated Press that she’s really concerned about police violence.

“We’re here to defend our rights, not to lose an eye or a hand,” Khelil said. She also said that she had noticed insulation problems and water leaks in the school building and had even seen rats on occasion. Other students confirmed that they’d seen rats too.

She was not convinced by Lecornu’s efforts to calm the situation.

“I don’t think the movement is going to lose momentum. As long as things don’t change, we’re going to see the movement grow stronger, and potentially a convergence of struggles, especially with the next presidential election coming up,” she said.

Not long after she spoke, police surrounded a nearby square. The crowd surged, and tear gas was fired.
‘Nothing will stop us’

Smoke from burning garbage nearby hung in the air at Place de la République as hundreds of high school and university students prepared to march toward Place de la Bastille, the demonstration’s focal point.

Some carried signs bearing their schools’ names; others held placards reading “More money for repression than for our education”, and “Who protects us from the police?”

“We’re here, we’re demonstrating, and we won’t stop. Until October, November, December if necessary. Nothing will stop us,” said Sofia Ferdials, 18, a student at Paris 8 University.

Dounia Gergeon, a 39-year-old school librarian, said she joined the demonstration at Place de la Bastille because she shared students’ concerns and worried about a broader crisis facing young people anxious about their futures. At the middle and high school where she works, time was set aside for students to discuss their demands.

“They do not feel supported,” she said. “They feel cornered and forced to work under these conditions.”

Authorities deployed tear gas and a water cannon at the protesters, some of whom hurled projectiles at riot police.

READ MOREWhat France's student protesters want – and what the government is offering
Protests in Belgium and Italy

France is not the only country to be dealing with student-related protests.

In Belgium, Willy Demeyer, the mayor of Liege, issued a ban on public gatherings until midnight on Oct. 16, citing a “real, serious and imminent risk” of further clashes and vandalism.

City police said they used water cannon and tear gas on Wednesday to hold back several hundred protesters. Authorities sent emergency text messages advising shopkeepers to close due to rioting.

Nearly 90 people were arrested and several police were injured. Police reinforcements were sent from the capital, Brussels, and from Antwerp, and more are coming. Smaller protests have been held in Mons and Charleroi.

Belgium’s Interior Minister Bernard Quintin said on social media that the “perpetrators will have to answer for their actions before the courts”.

The Belgian protests, organised through online chat groups, include demands for more teachers and smaller classes as well as complaints about education reform in Belgium, but are also likely inspired by events in France.

Student protests have spread to several Italian cities, though on a much smaller scale and over a broader set of domestic grievances. Activists have explicitly invoked the French movement with the slogan “let’s do as they do in France”, while organising school occupations, assemblies and marches.

In Turin, students occupied several high schools over building conditions, education funding and increased military spending. In Rome, students occupied one high school and walked out of another, while students in Naples added opposition to a planned migrant detention centre to their demands.

(FRANCE 24 with AP)



UN voices 'concern' over violence as French students plan more protests

Students stand in front of a blockaded high school as they protest against under-resourced schools, in Paris, Friday, 9 Oct., 2026.
Copyright (AP Photo/Teresa Suarez)

By Greta Ruffino
Published on

141 of France's 3,700 high schools were closed on Friday, according to the Education Ministry.

The United Nations (UN) said on Friday it was monitoring protests by high school students across France "with concern", as nationwide demonstrations entered their fifth consecutive day.

"We are following with concern incidents related to the student protests and high school blockades in France, some of which have turned violent," said Shabia Mantoo, spokesperson for the UN human rights agency.

Nearly 7,000 people, of whom 86 percent are minors, have been taken into police custody since mid-September, according to France's Justice Ministry.

The students, mostly aged between 15 and 18, are protesting against teacher shortages, overcrowded timetables, deteriorating school facilities and buildings ill-equipped to cope with rising temperatures.

While the demonstrations have been largely peaceful, some protesters have set fires and vandalised bus shelters.

Police have responded with tear gas, batons and blast balls, prompting accusations of excessive force from human rights groups and student protesters.

Authorities have launched 18 internal investigations into allegations of police misconduct.

Students protest against under-resourced schools in Paris, Thursday, 8 Oct., 2026. (AP Photo/Aurelien Morissard)

Government pledges action to address student demands

In an effort to ease tensions, Education Minister Edouard Geffray announced late Thursday that around 3,000 substitute teachers would be deployed in the coming days to cover staff shortages at the 114 high schools most affected by the protests.

Prime Minister Sebastien Lecornu has also pledged to introduce a plan to address the crisis by the end of October.

Meanwhile, Economy Minister Roland Lescure said the government could accommodate demands for additional school funding despite tight constraints on the 2027 budget.

Under the current draft budget, education is set to receive the second-largest funding increase after defence, with spending rising by 1.4% to €90.9 billion.

Student union representative Marius Mesnil said "we're being offered a few crumbs", while calling for another wave of demonstrations Tuesday.


 

Why are French high school pupils protesting?

Over the last three weeks, tens of thousands of students have taken to the streets across France to protest the state of schools in the country. From a shortage of teachers to overloaded timetables, dilapidated classrooms and buildings unsuitable for increasingly frequent heatwaves, we look at their biggest concerns.



Protest culture: Why do French students repeatedly rise up?

Cover image: French Connections © FRANCE 24


Issued on: 08/10/2026 - 
07:24 min From the show

France is in the international spotlight as massive student protests show no sign of stopping. Demonstrating is something of a rite of passage for young people in France, a moment when teenagers discover politics and their collective voice. How has this "protest culture" manifested itself in recent French history? And why are some student protests effective at bringing about change and others not? We take a closer look in French Connections.



International Criminal Court faces 'test of resilience' as US imposes sweeping sanctions

The Trump administration has imposed sweeping new sanctions on the International Criminal Court as part of its campaign to dismantle what it describes as a "rogue" tribunal, threatening to cripple its operations. Following the move, ⁠the European Union said it was "ready to take any necessary measures to enable the court to carry out its work".


Issued on: 09/10/2026 - 
By: FRANCE 24

The ICC tries individuals for the world's worst crimes.
 © Remko de Waal, ANP via AFP


US President Donald Trump's administration has imposed sweeping sanctions on the International Criminal Court that threaten to cripple its operations and spark fresh transatlantic tension.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced the sanctions Friday, after the Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to South African prosecutor Navi Pillay, a former judge at the ICC and other international courts.

Here's a look at the likely impact of the sanctions, possible responses, and the reasons behind Washington's unprecedented move, which the court said was an "assault on the rule of law".

What is the ICC and what does it do?


Based in the Dutch city of The Hague, the ICC tries individuals suspected of the world's worst offences – war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide.

Established in 2002 by the Rome Statute, it currently has 125 members. Major powers such as the United States, Russia, China, India, and Israel are not members of the court.

It is governed by a strict policy of "complementarity", meaning it can only take on cases a suspect's home country is unwilling or unable to try itself.

Since its establishment, the court has convicted 15 people, with four acquitted. Critics say the court has focused too heavily on war crimes committed in Africa and failed to convict major political leaders.

However, its most high-profile current case concerns ex-Philippines president Rodrigo Duterte, the first former Asian head of state to stand in the ICC dock.

The court, housed in a shiny glass building on the outskirts of The Hague, employs around 900 staff from 100 nationalities.

It is often confused with the International Court of Justice, also based in The Hague, which settles disputes between countries.

What impact will sanctions have?


The Trump administration has already issued several rounds of sanctions against top ICC officials but these latest actions go further, targeting the entire court.

ICC officials are concerned about access to banking, credit card facilities, insurance, and especially technology, given a heavy reliance on US systems.

"We have been extremely dependent on US technology solutions, Microsoft or systems related to Microsoft," acting chief prosecutor Mame Mandiaye Niang told AFP in a recent interview.

Cover image: File photo of the International Criminal Court (ICC) building in The Hague taken November 24, 2024. © Laurens Van Putten, AFP
01:55



"We are trying to find alternative means, maybe not as effective as the US technology, but at least to be able to maintain our independence, to be able to continue to work," said Niang.

The prosecutor, himself the target of sanctions, said they crippled daily life -- he was unable to book transport, hotels, or conduct banking operations.

But expanding them to the entire institution raises questions about the ICC's ability to pay staff, conduct investigations abroad, protect witnesses, and even operate its detention facilities.

"This is a test of our resilience," admitted Niang.


What can Europe do?


As the host city, the Dutch have a special responsibility to the ICC under the terms of a "Headquarters Agreement" signed in 2008.

This obliges the Netherlands to protect ICC facilities and staff, provide "any means of communication" and ensure "freedom of financial assets from restrictions".

In an unusually fiery speech last month at the United Nations General Assembly, Dutch Prime Minister Rob Jetten vowed to defend the ICC "in my country, in my city".

"How can you possibly be opposed to prosecuting the very worst crimes? I believe there can be only one response: 'hands off the ICC'," said Jetten to warm applause.


The European Union on Friday called the US sanctions "deeply regrettable" and said it was "ready to take any necessary measures to enable the court to carry out its work".

One possibility would be for the European Commission to deploy a legal instrument known as the "blocking mechanism".

This prohibits European firms from obeying the US sanctions "actively or by deliberate omission", giving the EU a potential means of cushioning some of the impact.

The EU blocking mechanism is seen as the "nuclear option", said Berendsen, adding that the Netherlands had nevertheless asked Brussels to prepare it.
Why is the US doing this?

The US is furious the court issued an arrest warrant for close ally, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, over alleged crimes in Gaza.

It is also concerned an ICC investigation into Afghanistan could result in accusations against US personnel.

Trump has upped his rhetoric against what he has called a "rogue institution" and "evil group of people" and the US has vowed to dismantle the court "brick-by-brick".

But even under less pugnacious presidents, Washington has never been a fan of the ICC and never considered joining.

The US has a law dubbed the "Hague Invasion Act", allowing it to take "all means necessary and appropriate" to defend US personnel or allies detained by the ICC.

In a clear swipe at Washington, Jetten vowed to defend the ICC "brick by brick" in comments just hours before the sanctions were announced.

(FRANCE 24 with AFP)

 

EU calls US sanctions on International Criminal Court 'regrettable'


By Greta Ruffino
Published on

The ICC was established to prosecute war crimes and crimes against humanity that might otherwise go unpunished.

The European Union on Friday described US sanctions against the International Criminal Court (ICC) as "deeply regrettable" and said it was "ready to take any necessary measures to enable the court to carry out its work".

"The EU will work closely with the ICC to ensure it continues to operate effectively," the European Commission said, adding it hoped that the six-month delay before the sanctions applied meant "there is room for dialogue"

One possible EU response would be to activate a legal instrument known as the "blocking mechanism", which prohibits European firms from obeying the US sanctions "actively or by deliberate omission", giving the European Union a potential means of cushioning some of the impact.

European Council President Antonio Costa and Dutch Prime Minister Rob Jetten responded to the sanctions on Friday during a joint press conference in The Hague.

"The justice, international justice, is the only alternative to revenge. Then we don't have lasting peace without accountability," Costa said.

"We urge United States to engage in the next, in the upcoming six months in order to overcome this, but our commitment is, we have a full commitment to support and continue to support ICC, the independence of the international justice, and to protect the members of the ICC and their staff."

Dutch Prime Minister Rob Jetten on Friday reaffirmed the Netherlands' commitment to defending the ICC against proposed US sanctions.

"We will do whatever we need to defend the ICC," Jetten said.

US sanctions on the ICC: What happened?

The Trump administration has imposed sweeping new sanctions on the ICC, accusing the tribunal of political bias and unfairly targeting Americans and Israelis over alleged war crimes.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced the measures on Friday, shortly after South African prosecutor Navi Pillay, a former ICC judge, was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. However, the decision to impose sanctions had been made well before the Nobel announcement.

“We will ban transactions with this rogue court, cutting off their resources and crippling its ability to operate against us,” Rubio said in a video address posted to social media. “The United States and the American people are not subject to the jurisdiction of this fake ICC.”

The sanctions freeze any ICC assets held in the United States and give US companies and individuals six months to end their business dealings with the court.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Friday welcomed US sanctions against the ICC, which has issued an arrest warrant for him over alleged crimes committed in Gaza.

"The ICC is not a court. It is a political body that poses a mortal threat to law abiding democracies worldwide and to the very idea of national sovereignty," Netanyahu's office posted on X.

How has the ICC reacted to the US sanctions?

The ICC condemned the sanctions, describing them as an attack on the rule of law and the international legal order.

“It is an attempt to obstruct the course of justice and to prevent the court from doing what it was created to do," the court said in a statement. "It is an assault on the rule of law and on the very foundations of the international legal order which strikes at the simple principle that no one stands above the law.”

ICC President Tomoko Akane said the court would “continue to fully discharge its mandate, with independence and impartiality, acting only on the basis of the law and the evidence, for the sake of the countless victims of grave crimes.”



ICC unseals arrest warrants for Taliban education ministers

The International Criminal Court on Monday unsealed warrants for Afghan Education Minister Habibullah Agha, and Higher Education Minister Neda Mohammad Nadeem, accusing two senior Taliban officials of crimes against humanity for denying Afghanistan's women and girls over 12 their rights to an education.



Issued on: 05/10/2026 - 
By: FRANCE 24


The Taliban government's education minister, Habibullah Agha, is accused of persecuting girls and women, along with the others targeted by the ICC warrants. © Wakil Kohsar, AFP (File)

The International Criminal Court on Monday unsealed arrest warrants for two Afghan education ministers accused of committing crimes against humanity through the Taliban government's restrictions on women and girls.

The warrants, for Habibullah Agha, minister of education, and Neda Mohammad Nadeem, minister of higher education, were issued on September 9, 2025 and remained under seal until Monday.

The other warrant unsealed is against Neda Mohammad Nadeem, minister for higher education © Wakil Kohsar, AFP (File)

The two officials are accused of gender-based persecution linked to policies that have barred girls over the age of 12 from school and excluded women from higher education following the Taliban's return to power in August 2021.

The ICC warrants were likely to increase international pressure on the Taliban government.

AFP has approached Taliban authorities for comment.

The two warrants against the ministers were issued after the ICC authorised warrants in July 2025 for Afghanistan's Supreme Taliban Leader Haibatullah Akhundzada and Supreme Court President Abdul Hakim Haqqani – parts of which have been made public.

Both Agha and Nadeem have played key roles in implementing the supreme leader's vision for Afghanistan.

Afghan girls are banned from attending school above primary level. © Omer Abrar, AFP (File)

"There are reasonable grounds to believe" the suspects committed "the crime against humanity of persecution on gender grounds", the court said.

It said the persecution was directed against women and girls, and the deprivation of their fundamental rights was committed "in connection with" other alleged crimes under the Taliban government's policies, including "imprisonment, torture, rape and enforced disappearance".

The court said the alleged crimes were committed in Afghanistan from the Taliban's takeover until at least January 20, 2025.

'Worsening' oppression

The ICC's disclosure of the warrants came the same day the UN Human Rights Council urged the Taliban authorities to repeal their "worsening" and "systematic oppression of all women and girls in Afghanistan".

The council's 47 member countries unanimously criticised that discrimination "and the harms that it has entrenched, which are unbearable, unjustifiable and should shock the conscience of humanity".

The ICC's Pre-Trial Chamber II said it decided to unseal all four warrants – with redactions – after concluding that doing so would not unduly affect ongoing investigations and could "prevent the commission of further crimes by the suspects".

The ICC said the unsealing of the warrants could 'promote cooperation by the international community'. © Remko de Waal, AFP File via ANP

Publication could also "promote cooperation by the international community... in relation to the situation in Afghanistan", it said.

Afghans across the country have told AFP journalists of severe mental health problems tied to the education ban, with teenage girls and women mostly staying at home.

Afghan universities are now men-only zones, where smartphones are banned and students can be chastised if their beards are not long enough.

Some women and girls have tried to continue their education by studying online, but their efforts are hampered by internet and electricity problems across Afghanistan.

Women are increasingly absent from public life and need to abide by a strict dress code when they leave home, covering everything but their eyes.


Women and girls in Afghanistan face big obstacles in continuing their education © Sanaullah SEIAM / AFP

They are banned from most jobs and a host of public places – including parks – and must have a close male relative escort them on long journeys.

The higher education ban has led to staff shortages in hospitals, multiple healthcare workers told AFP, as women are no longer allowed to qualify as doctors.

(FRANCE 24 with AFP)