Friday, April 15, 2022

Texas halts truck inspections that caused border gridlock

By PAUL J. WEBER

Truckers block the entrance into the Santa Teresa Port of Entry in Ciudad Juarez going into New Mexico on April 12, 2022. The truckers blocked the port as a protest to the prolonged processing times implemented by Gov. Abbott which they say have increased from 2-3 hours up to 14 hours in the last few days. 
(Omar Ornelas /The El Paso Times via AP)

AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — Texas Gov. Greg Abbott on Friday repealed his traffic-clogging immigration order that backed up commercial trucks at the U.S.-Mexico border, after a week of intensifying backlash and fears of deepening economic losses.

The Republican governor dropped his new rules that had required all commercial trucks from Mexico to undergo extra inspections to curb the flow of migrants and drugs and ratcheted up a fight with the Biden administration over immigration policy.

Some truckers reported waiting more than 30 hours to cross. Others blocked one of the world’s busiest trade bridges in protest.

Abbott, who is up for reelection in November and has made the border his top issue, fully lifted the inspections after reaching agreements with neighboring Mexican states that he says outline new commitments to border security. The last one was signed with the governor of Tamaulipas, who earlier this week said the inspections were overzealous and created havoc. On Friday, he joined Abbott and said they were ready to work together.

When Abbott first ordered the inspections, he did not say lifting them was conditional on such arrangements with Mexico.

Pressure was building on Abbott to retreat as gridlock on the border worsened. The American Trucking Association called the inspections “wholly flawed, redundant and adding considerable weight on an already strained supply chain.” One customs agency in Mexico estimated the losses at millions of dollars a day, and produce distributors warned of empty shelves and higher prices if the order was not rescinded soon.

Abbot acknowledged the trade slowdowns but showed no sign of regret. He said he was prepared to reimpose the inspections if Mexican states don’t hold up their end of the deal.

“I’m not hesitant to do so whatsoever,” Abbott said.

The U.S.-Mexico border is crucial to the U.S. economy and more of it is in Texas — roughly 1,200 miles (1,931 kilometers) — than any other state. The United States last year imported $390.7 billion worth of goods from Mexico, second only to China.

Trucks are inspected by U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents upon entering the country. Texas began its own inspections after the Biden administration said pandemic-related restrictions on claiming asylum at the border would be lifted May 23.

Abbott called the inspections a “zero tolerance policy for unsafe vehicles” smuggling migrants. He said Texas would take several steps in response to the end of the asylum restrictions, which is expected to lead to an increase in migrants coming to the border.

State troopers inspected more than 6,000 commercial vehicles over the past week, according to the Texas Department of Public Safety. Nearly 1 in 4 trucks were pulled off the road for what the agency described as serious violations that included defective tires and brakes.

Troopers did not turn up any human or drug trafficking during the inspections, said Department of Public Safety Director Steve McCraw. He described it as unsurprising, saying cartels knew the inspections were taking place.

But migrants are stopped at ports of entry in only about 5% of CBP encounters. The vast majority cross in mountains, deserts and cities between official crossings.

The dynamic with drug seizures is different, with fentanyl, heroin, methamphetamine and other hard narcotics being seized overwhelmingly at official crossings instead of between them. Their compact size and lack of odor make them extremely difficult to detect.

Abbott has also chartered buses to Washington, D.C., for migrants who wanted to go. The first drop-offs happened Wednesday, drawing criticism from the Biden administration. On Thursday, CBP Commissioner Chris Magnus said Texas was moving migrants without “adequately coordinating” with the federal government.

EXPLAINER: Why did Texas hold up trucks on border for days?

By ELLIOT SPAGAT and PAUL J. WEBER

A long line of trucks is seeing stalled at the Zaragoza International Bridge, one of two ports of entry in Ciudad Juarez going into the U.S.on April 12, 2022. The truckers blocked both north and south bound commercial lanes in protest after they have seen prolonged processing times implemented by Gov. Abbott which they say have increased from 2-3 hours up to 14 hours in the last few days. (Omar Ornelas /The El Paso Times via AP)

AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — Gov. Greg Abbott’s decision to impose additional inspections of trucks entering Texas from Mexico was his latest move in an unprecedented foray into border security, which has long been the federal government’s domain.

The two-term governor, like many Republican Party leaders, calls illegal immigration and drug smuggling from Mexico a “crisis” and fully blames President Joe Biden. His latest actions follow the Biden administration’s decision to end pandemic-related restrictions on claiming asylum at the border on May 23.

Here are some facts about conditions on the border and Abbott’s response:

HOW MANY MIGRANTS ARE APPEARING AT THE BORDER?

U.S. Customs and Border Protection stopped migrants 164,973 times in February, a daily average of nearly 5,900. March figures will be released soon, but CBP said it stopped migrants an average of 7,101 times a day during the week that ended March 28.

That’s an unusually large number; The last week in March was on pace to establish a new monthly high in Biden’s presidency and one of the busiest ever. The Border Patrol stopped migrants nearly 1.7 million times in the 12-month period that ended Sept. 30 — among the highest since the agency was founded in 1924 — but that number masks a critical difference.

Since March 2020, U.S. authorities have expelled migrants more than 1.7 million times under Title 42 authority, named for a 1944 public health law, using the threat of COVID-19 to deny migrants a chance to seek asylum as required under U.S. law and international treaty. Expulsions carry no legal consequences, encouraging repeat attempts. In the 2021 budget year, more than one of four migrants at the border had been stopped “multiple times,” with repeat crossers stopped an average of more than three times in the previous year. Consequently, the number of migrants who crossed the border is much lower than the number of times authorities have stopped migrants.

WHAT HAS BIDEN DONE?


The Democratic president undid many measures introduced by his Republican predecessor, Donald Trump, who belittled asylum as a “scam” and said the country was “full.” The Biden administration reversed a rule that generally prohibited domestic and gang violence as grounds for asylum and ended bilateral agreements to send some migrants to Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador to seek protection there instead of in the United States.

Biden suspended the “Remain in Mexico” policy on his first day in office after the Trump administration forced about 70,000 asylum-seekers to wait in Mexico for hearings in U.S. immigration court. He was forced to reinstate the policy in December under court order but numbers have been modest. The U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments April 26 on whether and how Biden can end the policy.

With COVID-19 infection rates dropping, the administration announced April 1 that it will end Title 42 authority on May 23. Some Democratic members of Congress joined Republican leaders to argue the move was premature and the administration unprepared. The Homeland Security Department says it is preparing for as many as 18,000 daily crossings.

On Thursday, 18 states joined Louisiana, Arizona and Missouri in a federal lawsuit to keep Title 42 authority in place. The additional states are: Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Kansas, Kentucky, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Utah, West Virginia and Wyoming. Texas is conspicuously absent.

WHAT IS TEXAS DOING?

Last year, Abbott launched a multibillion-dollar border security mission, deploying thousands of state troopers and National Guard members, installing new border barriers and jailing migrants on trespassing charges. Abbott, who is running for reelection in November, made it the cornerstone of his administration.

Texas, assuming a role like California’s during Trump’s presidency, has been a top legal adversary to changes in immigration policy. It joined Missouri in the case before the Supreme Court on ending “Remain in Mexico.”

After the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention announced that Title 42 authority was ending, Abbott began inspecting commercial vehicles in addition to CBP’s independent inspections, creating significant delays and backlash from his pro-business allies. He also chartered buses to Washington, D.C., for migrants who volunteered to take them.

On Friday, Abbott fully repealed the inspections after announcing agreements with neighboring Mexican governors about border security, but said he would not hesitate to reimpose them in the future. Migrants are stopped at ports of entry in only about 5% of CBP’s encounters. The vast majority cross in mountains, deserts and cities between official crossings.

The dynamic with drug seizures is different, with fentanyl, heroin, methamphetamine and other hard narcotics being seized overwhelmingly at official crossings instead of between them. Their compact size and lack of odor make them extremely difficult to detect.

IS ANY OF THIS NEW UNDER BIDEN?

No, there have been several spikes in migration since 2014, with a broken asylum system dogging three presidents. The United States became the world’s most popular destination for asylum-seekers in 2017.

Immigration experts refer to “push” factors that compel migrants to leave their homes and “pull” factors that refer to policies in destination countries that may influence decisions on where to go.

“Push” factors include hurricanes, violence, political repression and poverty, while “pull” factors include real or perceived changes in U.S. policy. One widely cited “pull” factor is a heavily backlogged U.S. asylum system; it takes an immigration judge four years on average to decide a claim for people who are not in custody.

Last month, the Biden administration unveiled a long-discussed and potentially significant change to expand authority of asylum officers to decide claims, not just initial screenings. It is designed to decide cases in months instead of years but officials say there are no additional funds for its launch, expected in late May, and to expect a slow start.

___

Spagat reported from San Diego.
How Russia Media Uses Fox News to Make Its Case

The conservative network has appeared hundreds of times in Russian media.


Credit...Illustration by Cristiana Couceiro; 
Photographs by Getty Images, Associated Press

By Stuart A. Thompson
Stuart Thompson writes about online information flows.
April 15, 2022

As Western leaders introduced sanctions against Russia for the invasion of Ukraine, Tucker Carlson, the Fox News host, said seizing personal property from Russian oligarchs went too far.

“No American government had ever done anything like that before,” he said.

While the segment was aimed at Fox News’s conservative audience, it found another audience in Russia. The argument was parroted beat by beat by RIA Novosti, a Russian state news agency, which wrote that “the average U.S. citizen is simply horrified by what is happening.”



In the U.S., Biden has been accused of destroying the country with anti-Russian sanctions
“No American government had ever done anything like that before. If there was one thing the U.S. government long stood for, it was the rule of law.”
“Ни одно американское правительство никогда не делало ничего подобного. Если и было что-то, что правительство Соединенных Штатов всегда решительно отстаивало, так это принцип верховенства закона”, — написал он.


An article on the Russian-language news site Ria Novosti featured content from a Fox News segment.

The narratives advanced by the Kremlin and by parts of conservative American media have converged in recent months, reinforcing and feeding each other. Along the way, Russian media has increasingly seized on Fox News’s prime-time segments, its opinion pieces and even the network’s active online comments section — all of which often find fault with the Biden administration — to paint a critical portrait of the United States and depict America’s foreign policy as a threat to Russia’s interests. Mr. Carlson was a frequent reference for Russian media, but other Fox News personalities — and the occasional news update from the network — were also included.

Sergey Lavrov, Russia’s foreign minister, who has made several false claims about the war — including that Russia never attacked Ukraine — singled out Fox News for praise last month.

“We understood long ago that there is no such thing as an independent Western media,” Mr. Lavrov told the state television station RT, adding that “only Fox News is trying to present some alternative point of view.”

Mentions of Fox News in Russian-language media grew 217 percent during the first quarter of this year compared with the final quarter of last year, as news coverage of Ukraine increased, according to an analysis by Zignal Labs, a media tracking company that reviewed social media posts, broadcast media and online websites. CNN, which has about three times the global viewership of Fox News, according to the tracking company Similarweb, was mentioned more often but grew less, by 71 percent.

When reached for comment, a Fox News spokeswoman pointed to segments in which Mr. Carlson was critical of Russia and its president, Vladimir V. Putin.

To better understand Fox News’s presence in Russian state media, The New York Times reviewed nearly 500 Russian-language articles mentioning Fox News between July and late March, sourced from the two largest state news agencies in the country — RIA Novosti and TASS — along with dozens of articles from other Russian-language media.

Here are four ways Russian media has used Fox News to bolster the government’s narrative about the war.

1. Blaming NATO expansion




U.S. Colonel: “The first thing we must do is accept Putin's point of view”
“We should acknowledge that. Stop pretending that’s a non-issue.”
“Нам нужно это признать. Прекратить притворяться, словно это не проблема”, - завил он в эфире Fox News.


An article on the Russian-language news site Tsargrad featured content from a Fox News segment.

The echoing narratives were clear from the eve of the invasion. Mr. Putin warned that he would use “military technical measures” if threatened by NATO.

When Douglas Macgregor, a retired Army colonel, repeated Russia’s argument on Mr. Carlson’s show, it didn’t take long for Russian news media to cite him.

“He pointed out that Russia does not want to see American and NATO troops near its borders, just like the U.S. wouldn’t want to see Russian troops in Cuba,” said one article from Tsargrad, a pro-Putin Russian television channel. “This is a perfectly logical position.”

Tsargrad was started in 2015 with help from John Hanick, a former Fox News producer. Mr. Hanick was charged last month with violating U.S. sanctions. Federal prosecutors accused him of helping a Russian oligarch spread “destabilizing messages.”


2. Buttressing conspiracy theories



This journalist almost swore after learning the truth about U.S. laboratories in Ukraine
“I’ll try not to use profanity on the air to describe our reaction. Our jaws dropped, let’s leave it there. Under oath in an open committee hearing, Victoria Nuland just confirmed that the Russian disinformation they’ve been telling us for days is a lie, and a conspiracy theory, and crazy and immoral to believe, is in fact, totally and completely true.”
“Попробую использовать в эфире ненормативную лексику, чтобы описать нашу реакцию: челюсти попадали, скажем так. Под присягой на открытых слушаниях комитета Виктория Нуланд подтвердила, что российская дезинформация, которую они днями называли ложью, теорией заговора, сумасшествием, в которое аморально верить, на самом деле целиком и полностью правда”, – цитирует Карлсона РИА Новости.

An article on the Russian-language news site Radio Sputnik featured content from a Fox News segment.

The unsupported idea that the United States was developing bioweapons in Ukraine has been nurtured for years in Russia. It found new resonance during the invasion of Ukraine.

After a Senate hearing on the matter, in which Victoria Nuland, an under secretary of state, confirmed the existence of biolabs in Ukraine, Mr. Carlson used his show to suggest that the U.S. government was being untruthful about conducting bioweapons work in the country. Russian media seized on the segment.

“The U.S. baselessly accused Russia of spreading disinformation about biolabs in Ukraine because they later actually confirmed their existence, TV presenter Tucker Carlson told Fox News,” Radio Sputnik wrote in an article summarizing Mr. Tucker’s lengthy segment for a Russian audience.

3. Questioning the West’s goals



An American politician believes that the United States is forcing Zelensky’s hand toward massacre
“There is a peace offer on the table, but we’re leading Zelensky on and leading them down the path to further slaughter, and not encouraging them to follow this pass of diplomacy.”
По словам республиканца, кандидатуру которого в Конгресс поддержал бывший американский лидер Дональд Трамп, эскалация на Украине служит “отличным способом отвлечь внимание от политического кризиса” внутри США.


An article on the Russian-language news site TASS featured content from a Fox News segment.

Interviews with pundits and politicians were also used to undermine the West’s support of Ukraine. Joe Kent, a Republican candidate for the House from Washington State, said on Fox News that the West’s support of Ukraine was killing people, because the support was giving Ukraine an incentive not to agree to a peace deal with Russia.

TASS quickly repeated his criticisms.

“According to the Republican, whose candidacy was supported by former U.S. leader Donald Trump, the escalation in Ukraine is ‘a great way to divert attention from the political crisis’ within the United States,” the article said.





4. Criticizing President Biden




In the United States, the truth about why Biden is helping Ukraine has been revealed
“You wouldn’t want to think that your government would intentionally exacerbate the suffering of millions of Ukrainian civilians in order to take over America’s energy grid. But that seems to be exactly what is happening right now.”
“Вы бы не хотели признать, что ваше правительство намеренно усугубляет страдания миллионов украинских граждан, чтобы захватить энергетическую сеть США, но, похоже, именно это сейчас и происходит”, — сказал он.


An article on the Russian-language news site Prime featured content from a Fox News segment.

Russian media frequently highlighted stories from Fox News that were critical of President Biden.

Nearly 400 Russian-language stories mentioned Fox News the week that Mr. Biden directed an under-the-breath expletive at Steve Doocy, a Fox News reporter, according to Zignal Labs. The exchange was repeated for weeks in stories criticizing the president’s fitness for the job.

As the invasion began, attention shifted to questioning Mr. Biden’s motives. One article by Prime, a Russian news agency, detailed Mr. Carlson’s argument that Mr. Biden had encouraged the conflict to make “fossil fuels unaffordable for the average person and that way, people would have no choice but to switch” to renewable energy.

“The broadcaster said such reforms would jeopardize American industry, impoverish entire cities and make the United States dependent on Chinese solar panels,” the article said.


Stuart A. Thompson is a reporter in the technology department covering misinformation and disinformation.
@stuartathompson
UN says nine million in need of aid in South Sudan

Nearly nine million people will need aid this year in South Sudan, according to the UN, as the world's youngest country struggles with a food crisis and rising violence.

The New Arab Staff & Agencies
15 April, 2022


The UN's envoy to South Sudan warned on Thursday that almost nine million people will be in need of aid this year as the fragile country grapples with a surge in violence between armed factions and a food crisis.

Clashes have flared anew in the world's youngest nation despite a pledge by President Salva Kiir and his rival, Vice President Riek Machar, to silence their guns and strive toward implementing key provisions of a 2018 peace pact.

Nicholas Haysom, the head of the UN Mission in South Sudan (UNMISS), called on the leaders to step up efforts to quell the violence and urged the international community to channel in more assistance.

"This year two-thirds of the population or almost nine million people -- 4.6 million of which are children -- will need aid to survive," Haysom told reporters in the capital Juba.

"Food insecurity will be widespread. And that is worsening because of climate change, conflict and displacement."

Haysom said he was "discouraged by the resurgence of sub-national violence," highlighting the plight of thousands of people driven from their homes by fighting that erupted last week between pro-Kiir and pro-Machar forces in oil-rich Unity State.

The clashes in Leer County sent 14,000 people fleeing, according to the local authorities, while the UN also voiced alarm about reports of sexual violence, looting and destruction of property.

Traditionally a pro-Machar stronghold, Leer was an epicentre of a humanitarian crisis that emerged out of the 2013-2018 civil war, ravaged by violence as well as a famine.

South Sudan has been wracked by instability since independence in 2011 and is still struggling to draw a line under the war that claimed the lives of almost 400,000 people.

Haysom said the upsurge in fighting was increasing the number of people in need of aid and adding to woes from expected flooding in many areas in the coming months.

"Continued and sufficient funding is urgently needed to stop the worst from happening."

Kiir and Machar earlier this month agreed on the creation of a unified armed forces command -- a key component of the peace deal -- and Haysom said he hoped it would open a window of opportunity to address the problems the country faces.

"With 10 months left in the transitional period, I am now strongly encouraging all parties to channel renewed momentum towards completing the remaining benchmarks of the peace agreement and to reach an agreement as to when the elections should be held," Haysom said.

A two-year transition period laid down in the peace accord is due to end in February 2023, with elections due to be held 60 days beforehand.

"If you ask me if the country is ready for elections right now, I would say no... because the technical conditions have not been put in place," he said, such as the creation of an election management body and an electoral law.

"They cannot be held if this violence is rampant throughout the country," Haysom added, calling for a "greater level of commitment to peaceful coexistence across the country."

Kyrgyzstan At A Crossroads: “Immense Opportunity To Harness Potential Of Women” – UN Experts

BISHKEK (15 April 2022) – Kyrgyzstan has taken notable strides towards women’s rights and gender equality since gaining independence in 1991, but serious challenges remain in areas such as socio-economic disparities, deep-rooted patriarchal attitudes and rising religious fundamentalism, UN human rights experts said today.

“Kyrgyzstan stands at a crossroads with an immense opportunity to harness the potential of women,” the UN Working Group on discrimination against women and girls said in a statement at the end of their 12-day visit to the country.

The experts acknowledged new laws and institutional measures focusing on gender equality, as well as targeted programmes and initiatives aimed at combating patriarchal attitudes and harmful stereotypes. They were however concerned at the narrow conceptual framing of key legal concepts such as discrimination and the gaps in implementation of the laws.

“While formal commitments have been made to advance women’s rights and gender equality, the leading root causes and drivers of gender-based discrimination and violence, which in the Kyrgyz context include harmful gender stereotyping, lack of economic opportunity and security for women and girls, are not being systematically addressed by duty-bearers.

“Addressing gender stereotypes is at the core of ensuring women and girls can enjoy their rights equally with men and boys”, the experts said.

“Despite Kyrgyzstan being a secular State, rising religious extremism is limiting women and girl’s progress whilst reinforcing attitudes about women’s role as procreators and child-bearers and impeding important conversations challenging traditional norms.

“There are also gaps in the legal framework with regard to violence against women, including in the definition of rape and in relation to sexual violence within marriage” the experts said. “The prevalence of gender-based violence further limits women’s capacity to build assets and participate in all aspects of national development and undermines the benefits that women in Kyrgyzstan could gain from the new progressive laws.

“We are concerned at the limited enforcement of the temporary protection orders, the lack of victim support and the barriers to women’s and girls’ access to justice in cases of gender-based violence. When the system fails women, the outcome can be catastrophic, including early deaths, killings, injuries and disabilities.

“Furthermore, we call on the authorities to ensure a safe and enabling environment for all women’s and girls’ organizations who play a central role in ensuring a healthy democracy and the fulfilment of human rights.”

The Working Group issued a series of recommendations, including calling for the collection of gender-disaggregated data and ensuring gender responsive budgeting for all programmes and implementation of laws and decrees. “Proper data collection and its analysis would positively influence policy development,” the experts said.

They met national and local authorities, women and girls, civil society organisations, academics, journalists, elected women leaders, UN entities and other international stakeholders in Bishkek city, and Issyk Kul and Osh regions.

The Working Group will present its final report to the Human Rights Council in June 2023.

 

The UN Working Group on discrimination against women and girls was created by the Human Rights Council in 2011 to identify, promote and exchange views, in consultation with States and other actors, on good practices related to the elimination of laws that discriminate against womenThe Group is also tasked with developing a dialogue with States and other actors on laws that have a discriminatory impact where women are concerned.

The Working Group is composed of five independent experts: Ms Melissa Upreti (Nepal), Chairperson; Ms Dorothy Estrada Tanck (Vice Chair); Ms Elizabeth Broderick (Australia); Ms Ivana Radačić (Croatia); and Ms Meskerem Geset Techane (Ethiopia).

© Scoop Media

Saudi Arabia: Arrest Campaign Against Judges Raises Multi-directional Concerns

Geneva – The Saudi Arabian authorities have launched an arrest campaign that affected several judges working in the Court of First Instance, the Court of Appeal, and the Supreme Court in the Kingdom, Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor said in a statement expressing grave concern.

The Saudi State Security Service detained an unspecified number of court judges a few days ago, according to reports. In most cases, the security forces stormed the judges' workplaces and took them to unknown destinations without informing them of the reasons for their arrest or ensuring that proper legal procedures were followed.

The arrests affected prominent judges, including Abdul Aziz Al Jaber, Mohammed Al-Omari, Mohammed Al-Ghamdi, Nasser Al-Harbi, and others whose numbers or names are still unknown.

The authorities have not issued any official statement regarding the arrest campaign or its causes, raising fears about the fate of the judges in the absence of any information about their whereabouts or their legal status.

Some of the arrested judges had issued unfair rulings against some prisoners of conscience during the past two years. This indicates that arbitrary policies are not limited to opponents only but may affect everyone regardless of their position or social, religious, or political activities.

It is also feared that these arrests were executed to pressure the judges to pass new rulings or decisions or within a wide campaign to illegally restructure the judiciary to further the executive authority's control over the judiciary.

This campaign against judges is very similar to other campaigns against intellectuals, writers, clerics, and opponents during the past years, as such arrests are carried out by orders of higher sovereign bodies, without following due legal procedures.

The lack of legal and judicial oversight over the executive authorities in the Kingdom has led to the restriction of the rights of individuals, and their subjection to various types of violations and abuse, without fear of any form of accountability.

The authorities should state the reasons for the arrest campaign against the judges, immediately disclose their location and conditions of detention, and enable them to enjoy their full legal rights, especially to meet with their families and lawyers. The authorities should also release judges who have not been convicted or proven guilty, respect the judiciary and its work, and distance it from unjustified arbitrary policies.

© Scoop Media

Israel Killed Five Times As Many Palestinians In 2022 Than It Killed In The Same Period In 2021

Geneva - Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor said that Israeli forces have significantly escalated the killing and repression of Palestinians in the West Bank and East Jerusalem during the past several days, following a green light from the political officials in Israel.

Euro-Med's field team documented the killing of 18 Palestinians in the first half of this month, most of whom died following statements by Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett on 8 April, granting a mandate to the Israeli army to wage an unrelenting war on what was he described as terrorism.

The violence of the Israeli forces extended to Al-Aqsa Mosque this morning, as large forces of the Israeli police stormed the mosque's courtyards and violently attacked worshipers inside, injuring more than 150 Palestinians arresting 400 others.

The Israeli forces' decision to storm the Al-Aqsa Mosque and the unjustified attack on the worshipers inside it reflects the recklessness of decision-makers in Israel and an apparent desire for escalation. This behavior may have severe repercussions on the stability in Jerusalem and throughout the Palestinian territories. It happened in May of last year.

Euro-Med Monitor documented the killing of 47 Palestinians, including eight children and two women, by Israeli forces in various incidents since 2022. This number represents nearly five times the number of Palestinians killed by the Israeli army in the same period last year, which amounted to 10.

The authorization of the Israeli politicians for the army and security to operate with "full freedom to defeat terrorism" seemed to have paved the way for the unjustified excuse to kill and abuse Palestinian civilians at military checkpoints and in the cities, villages, and towns of the West Bank and East Jerusalem.

The Israeli politicians bear full responsibility for the killings of Palestinians, especially those unarmed women and children killed in cold blood without posing any threat to the lives of Israeli soldiers.

Euro-Med Monitor's statement linked the increase in killings against Palestinians this year to the new instructions for the shooting policy approved by the Israeli army on 20 December 2021, which gave the green light to soldiers in the West Bank to open fire on Palestinian youths who threw stones and Molotov cocktails.

The Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett had welcomed these amendments, saying that they would "allow the soldiers to defend themselves."

Although the Israeli army policy of shooting was already flexible and often led to killings against Palestinians without any justification or proportionality, the new instructions made pulling the trigger an easy matter for the soldiers, in light of the presence of a supportive official decision and procedures that protect them from any accountability.

"As a result, the killings witnessed a remarkable increase during the year. In January, five Palestinians were killed, and in February, six Palestinians were killed, and in March, the number rose to 18, while 18 Palestinians were killed in just 14 days in this April."

Euro-Med Monitor said that among the Palestinians killed, 29 people, including seven children and two women, were killed in shootings without any justification or involvement in any incidents related to the killing, translating into the policy of excessive use of force that the Israeli forces have been practicing against the Palestinians.

At least eight field executions were recorded under the pretext of suspicion or attempted stabbing, as the Israeli army left all the victims to bleed to death. The injured were not provided with any first aid in flagrant violation of the rules of international humanitarian law.

Six people were also killed in two assassinations (extrajudicial executions) in Nablus and Jenin. Six others were killed during armed clashes that followed the Israeli forces' storming of Palestinian cities in the West Bank. Only five people were killed while carrying out attacks against Israelis in Beersheba, Hadera, and Tel Aviv.

Euro-Med Monitor stresses that the Israeli persistence in using lethal force against civilians is an inevitable result of the absence of internal accountability in Israel and of the policy of the international community, which allows Israel to get away with violations every time.

Euro-Med Monitor calls on the United Nations mechanisms and bodies concerned with urgent action to protect civilians in the Palestinian territories and take serious steps to ensure accountability for the horrific murders committed against them.

Euro-Med Monitor also calls on all concerned parties to immediately intervene to stop the Israeli attacks, especially in Al-Aqsa Mosque, and not allow the Israeli government to continue committing extremist acts that may lead to an escalation in other areas.

© Scoop Media

Putin underestimated Ukrainian, global resistance: Fareed Zakaria

Indian-American journalist Fareed Zakaria, in an exclusive interview with India Today, talked about how Russia underestimated the Ukrainian as well as global resistance.


India Today Web Desk 
]New Delhi
 April 16, 2022 

Fareed Zakaria (File photo: Reuters)


Russian President Vladimir Putin underestimated the Ukrainian resistance as well as the global response to Moscow's invasion of Kyiv, veteran journalist and geopolitical expert Fareed Zakaria told India Today TV.

In an exclusive conversation with India Today TV's Consulting Editor Rajdeep Sardesai, Fareed Zakaria said that even if Russia prevails in the war, the cost is too high. "Putin underestimated the Ukrainian resistance and more importantly, the global resistance," he said.

When asked if Russia's invasion could inspire 'autocracies' to invade other countries, Fareed Zakaria said, "I think if the Russians just show that through sheer force, brutality, viciousness and staying power, they are able to prevail... I think that sends one message to China and the world that this is going to be very tough. There is going to be a lot of international opinion against you. But if you just brazen it out and use every man and weapon that you have, you will win for sure, but the cost will be too high."

While talking about Pakistan’s stand on the Russia-Ukraine war, Fareed Zakaria said, “The Pakistanis have made their choice and it’s absolutely clear. Pakistan is essentially becoming a vessel state of China and by far there is the Pakistani position, the military holds it, the civilians hold it, the aid flows are going to be so good that they are not going to make any other argument”



Fareed Zakaria also talked about India’s stand on the Ukraine crisis and said that New Delhi should think about its national interest. “I find it a remarkable lack of rethinking of understanding of how this new position of India is in this new geo-political environment. I continue to say that there is also a people-to-people dimension here which is important to think about”.

ALSO READ: India abstains from voting against Russia as UNGA deplores Moscow's actions in Ukraine

“When I sometimes hear some of the Delhi elite telling me how the West is declining and how the East is rising in India, and bet on that. I say to them when you start sending your children to Chinese university, then that’s when I actually believe that you believe in this. The truth of the matter is that India is, as a society, much more comfortable in dealing with other democracies than the societies of the West and that also should count for something”, he said.


“India is a democracy, and its foreign policies should not be made entirely ignoring that democratic bottom of the element,” said Fareed Zakaria.

India continued to maintain its neutral stance as it has abstained from voting against Russia at the UN.
It’s not over: COVID-19 cases are on the rise again in the U.S.


A sign advises visitors to don face coverings at a hospital in Aurora, Colo. COVID-19 cases are rising again in the United States, with numbers up in most states and up steeply in several.
(David Zalubowski / Associated Press)

BY LAURA UNGAR
ASSOCIATED PRESSAPRIL 15, 2022 

Yet again, the U.S. is trudging into what could be another COVID-19 surge, with coronavirus infections rising in most states and nationally after a two-month decline.

One big unknown? “We don’t know how high that mountain’s going to grow,” said Dr. Stuart Campbell Ray, an infectious disease expert at Johns Hopkins University.

No one expects a peak nearly as high as the last one, when the highly contagious Omicron variant ripped through the population.

But experts warn that the coming wave — caused by an Omicron subvariant called BA.2 that’s thought to be about 30% more contagious than the original Omicron — will wash across the nation. They worry that hospitalizations, which are already ticking up in some parts of the Northeast, will rise in more states in the coming weeks. And the case wave will be bigger than it looks, they add, because reported numbers are vast undercounts as more people test at home without reporting their infections or skip testing altogether.

At the height of the previous Omicron surge, daily tallies of new reported cases reached into the hundreds of thousands. As of Thursday, the seven-day rolling average for new cases rose to 39,521, up from 30,724 two weeks earlier, according to data from Johns Hopkins collected by the Associated Press.

Dr. Eric Topol, head of Scripps Research Translational Institute, said the numbers are likely to keep growing until the surge reaches about a quarter the height of the last “monstrous” one. BA.2 may well have the same effect in the U.S. as it did in Israel, where it created a “bump” in cases, he said.

Keeping the surge somewhat in check, experts said, is a higher level of immunity in the U.S. from vaccination or past infection now compared with the early winter.

(BPT) - The weather is warming and now is the best time to plan your spring and summer vacation in the beautiful outdoors of The Natural State — Arkansas. While Arkansas offers an abundance of outdoor recreational opportunities on dry land and in...

But Ray said the U.S. could wind up looking like Europe, where the BA.2 surge was “substantial” in some places that had comparable levels of immunity. “We could have a substantial surge here,” he said.


CALIFORNIA
Infectious Omicron BA.2 now dominant in U.S., with coronavirus spring rise likely
March 29, 2022


Both experts said BA.2 will move through the country gradually. The Northeast has been hit hardest so far, with more than 90% of new infections caused by BA.2 last week, compared with 86% nationally. As of Thursday, the highest rates of new COVID cases per capita over the past 14 days were in Vermont, Rhode Island, Alaska, New York and Massachusetts.

In Washington, D.C., which also ranks in the top 10 for rates of new cases, Howard University announced it was moving most undergraduate classes online for the rest of the semester because of “a significant increase in COVID-19 positivity” in the district and on campus.

Some states, such as Rhode Island and New Hampshire, saw the average of daily new cases more than double in two weeks, according to Johns Hopkins data.

Joseph Wendelken, a spokesperson for the Rhode Island Department of Health, said that despite rising cases, hospitalizations remain relatively low, and that’s the metric they are most focused on right now. About 55 COVID-19 patients are hospitalized, compared with more than 600 at one point in the pandemic.

Officials credit high vaccination rates. State statistics show 99% of Rhode Island adults are at least partially vaccinated and 48% have gotten the booster dose that scientists say is key in protecting against severe illness with Omicron.


COVID-19 is fading. But ending the health emergency could leave us vulnerable
March 14, 2022

Vermont also has relatively high levels of vaccination and fewer patients in the hospital than during the height of the first Omicron wave. But Dr. Mark Levine, the health commissioner there, said hospitalizations and the numbers of patients in intensive care units are both up slightly, although deaths have not risen.

Data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention shows that new hospital admissions of patients with confirmed coronavirus infections were up slightly in New England and the New York region.

On the West Coast, modelers from Oregon Health & Science University are projecting a slight increase in hospitalizations over the next two months in that state, where cases have also risen steeply.

As the wave moves across the country, experts said states with low vaccination rates may face substantially more infections and severe cases that wind up in the hospital.

Ray said government leaders must be careful to strike the right tone when talking to people about protecting themselves and others after COVID restrictions have largely been lifted. Philadelphia recently became the first major U.S. city to reinstate its indoor mask mandate after a sharp increase in infections. But Vermont’s Levine said there were no plans to bring back any of the restrictions that were imposed earlier during the pandemic.

“It’s going to be hard to institute restrictive, draconian measures,” Ray said. “Fortunately, we have some tools that we can use to mitigate risk. And so I hope that leaders will emphasize the importance for people to watch the numbers,” be aware of risks and consider taking precautions such as wearing masks and getting vaccinated and boosted if they’re not already.


CALIFORNIA
It’s a big mistake to think pandemic is over, despite recent good news, experts say
Feb. 23, 2022

Lynne Richmond, a 59-year-old breast cancer survivor who lives in Silver Spring, Md., said she plans to get her second COVID-19 booster shot and keep wearing her mask in public as cases rise in her state and in nearby Washington, D.C.

“I never really stopped wearing my mask. ... I’ve stayed ultra-vigilant,” she said. “I feel like I’ve come this far; I don’t want to get COVID.”

Vigilance is a good strategy, experts said, because the coronavirus is constantly throwing curveballs. One of the latest: even more contagious subvariants of BA.2 found in New York state, known as BA.2.12 and BA.2.12.1. And scientists warn that potentially dangerous new variants could arise at any time.

“We shouldn’t be thinking the pandemic is over,” Topol said. “We should still keep our guard up.”

Associated Press writer Wilson Ring in Stowe, Vt., contributed to this report.

Starbucks CEO Schultz Blasts ‘False Promises’ by Past Management

Howard Schultz

(Bloomberg) -- Starbucks Corp. Chief Executive Officer Howard Schultz, moving to further put his stamp on the coffee giant in his third stint at the helm, criticized “false promises” and poor short-term decisions by prior management in a message to employees.

In a seven-minute video set to be sent to Starbucks employees Friday and viewed by Bloomberg News, Schultz discussed the feedback he received from employees around the country in recent meetings he dubbed “co-creation sessions.”

“I think there’s been a lot of false promises over the last few years -- those days are over,” Schultz said, without elaborating. “We’re going to make promises that we can keep, we’re going to make promises that are real.”

Schultz said he realized through the employee sessions that “there’s been many short-term decisions that have had an adverse long-term effect on the company. We’re going to reverse that. We’re going to make much better long-term decisions that are going to have a short-term benefit for you.”

Employees expressed desires for better training and guaranteed hours, Schultz said, as well as detailing problems such as ice and espresso machines breaking and taking a long time to get repaired.

“We are going to fix the near-term problems like maintenance people not showing up on time ... and we’re going to fix the bigger issues of training, wages and the other issues facing the company,” he said.

The 68-year-old Schultz earlier this month succeeded Kevin Johnson, 61, who had been CEO since 2017. He has moved swiftly in the role, suspending share buybacks to spend more on stores and staff, and dismissing former General Counsel Rachel Gonzalez as the company contends with a fast-spreading unionization effort.

Starbucks shares have been under pressure for months and have continued to fall during Schultz’s renewed tenure as investors worry his plans will squeeze profit margins. The stock was down 32% this year through Thursday, worse than the 7.8% fall of the S&P 500 index.

Schultz didn’t refer directly to the union fight in his video message but pledged to execute against the “fantastic ideas” employees had shared with him.

“We have to reimagine the customer experience, the partner experience, the third-place experience; we have to reimagine mobile order and pay, the drive-thru,” he said. “We have a lot of work to do.”

©2022 Bloomberg L.P.

China’s Zhengzhou Locks Down Areas Near Major IPhone Plant

(Bloomberg) -- China’s Zhengzhou city has locked down some areas near Foxconn Technology Group’s main iPhone manufacturing base in a move that could spell further trouble for Apple Inc.’s supply chain. 

Local authorities announced late Friday they are placing some areas in the Zhengzhou Airport Economy Zone under quarantine effective immediately, according to a statement on its official WeChat account. People in the area will not be permitted to leave, according to the statement.  

The Zhengzhou Airport Economy Zone is home to the world’s largest iPhone assembly plant, where staff have been ordered to undergo mandatory Covid-testing in recent days. Foxconn and Apple didn’t immediately reply to emailed queries about whether the lockdown will affect operations.  

Read more: IPhone City Staff in China to Undergo Mandatory Virus Tests

The fresh controls mark a widening of curbs in China, which is battling its worst Covid-19 outbreak in the past two years. Major cities from Shanghai to Guangzhou have already imposed restrictions on their citizens, fueling burgeoning anger against the government. 

Fellow Apple suppliers Pegatron Corp. and Quanta Computer Inc. have halted production in eastern China to comply with local Covid-related restrictions. 

©2022 Bloomberg L.P.