Showing posts sorted by date for query ANGOLA. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query ANGOLA. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Thursday, April 30, 2026

Why UAE's OPEC exit is a blow to Saudi Arabia

Nik Martin
DW
 30/04/2026

The United Arab Emirates is leaving OPEC to pump more oil on its own terms. The break strips Saudi Arabia of a key partner and adds to growing uncertainty over the cartel's future.



The UAE, then part of the Trucial States, joined the OPEC oil cartel in 1967
Image: Karim Sahib/AFP


Why has the UAE decided to quit OPEC now?

OPEC, the global cartel of oil-producing nations, operates a quota system that limits how much oil each member can produce.

For years, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) has clashed with Saudi Arabia, OPEC’s most powerful member, over these quotas. The UAE has invested heavily to expand its oil industry and grow its market share, but OPEC limits have repeatedly held it back.

Energy Minister Suhail Al Mazrouei told the New York Times on Tuesday: "The world needs more energy. The world needs more resources, and [the] UAE wanted to be unconstrained by any groups."

The UAE is now betting it can sell more oil once the Iran war and Strait of Hormuz crisis ends, both in the medium and the longer term. Analysts, meanwhile, see the move as a calculated step by a producer ready to act independently.

"Losing a member with 4.8 million barrels per day of capacity, and the ambition to produce more, takes a real tool out of the group's [OPEC] hands," said Jorge Leon, head of geopolitical analysis at research consultancy Rystad Energy.

"With demand nearing a peak, the calculation for producers with low-cost barrels is changing fast, and waiting your turn inside a quota system starts to look like leaving money on the table."

The UAE, which joined OPEC in 1967 through Abu Dhabi, will leave both OPEC and the wider OPEC+ alliance, which includes Russia, on May 1.

The UAE currently produces roughly 3.2 to 3.6 million barrels per day (bpd) under quotas but holds spare capacity of nearly 4.8 million bpd, Reuters news agency reported. Plans call for a hike in output toward 5 million bpd by next year.

How does the UAE's exit weaken OPEC and Saudi Arabia’s leadership?

The UAE's exit removes one of the few OPEC members with meaningful spare oil capacity, leaving Saudi Arabia unable to easily share the burden of output adjustments.

The Gulf Kingdom has traditionally managed oil prices by cutting its own production and enforcing discipline across the group. With the UAE gone, Saudi Arabia will have to rely much more on its own oil production cuts to stabilize prices.

This will make defending oil prices more expensive and less effective for Riyadh. It also weakens the Kingdom's ability to manage and discipline the wider OPEC group.

David Oxley, chief climate and commodities economist at the London-based Capital Economics research house, called the move "the thin end of the wedge," warning in an analysis its website that "the ties binding OPEC members together have loosened."

Saudi Arabia needs high oil prices — around $90 (€77) per barrel — to fund government spending and its ambitious Vision 2030, a set of huge infrastructure projects to cut the Kingdom's reliance on fossil fuels. These include a $500 billion futuristic city named NEOM.

Every extra barrel the country holds back means lost revenue, which hurts the country's ability to grow its economy.

The exit also exposes long‑standing tensions inside OPEC, especially the perception that Saudi Arabia dominates decision-making.

The move also comes at a time when OPEC's overall influence has been shrinking. The cartel once controlled more than half of global supply; today, it commands less than a third.

What does the UAE exit mean for global oil prices?


The UAE's departure is unlikely to cause major immediate swings in global oil prices, largely because the ongoing disruption in the Strait of Hormuz already dominates the market.

Much of the region's oil exports remain blocked and the UAE is redirecting about 1.8 million bpd to its Fujairah port on the Gulf of Oman coast via a pipeline that is running at maximum capacity. Any additional production the country plans to bring online cannot reach markets right away.

As a result, the announcement had little immediate effect on prices, with Brent crude largely unchanged on Tuesday.

"In the short term, I don't expect it [the exit] to have major impacts because what's happening in the Strait of Hormuz dominates the whole global oil picture in a way that renders this news from OPEC as kind of a minor thing," Jeff Colgan, an expert on OPEC at Brown University, told DW

Once the situation in the Hormuz situation normalizes, the UAE could add several hundred thousand extra barrels per day to the market. In the longer term, the exit points to modestly lower and more volatile oil prices.

OPEC will have 11 remaining members after the UAE's exit
Image: Maxim Shemetov/REUTERS


Could the UAE prompt other producers to reconsider OPEC?

Some oil industry analysts say the UAE's exit adds to longer-running doubts about OPEC's future cohesion.

"It is possible that we could see the whole organization fall apart," Colgan told DW, adding that he believes Saudi Arabia will likely try to keep the group together as "the key anchor to the whole organization."

The UAE's exit does, however, highlight growing frustrations with OPEC's quota system and exposes rifts, especially with Riyadh.

OPEC has already been under strain from repeated quota breaches by members such as Iraq and Nigeria, and from Russia's inconsistent compliance within OPEC+. The UAE's departure adds to that sense of fragmentation.

In his analysis for Capital Economics, Oxley warned that, in the medium term, if other producers with spare capacity "see the UAE successfully gaining flexibility and market share" outside OPEC, "others may follow."

For now, most members lack the UAE's production capacity or economic diversification, so a mass exodus is unlikely.

The UAE is not the first OPEC member to leave. Qatar exited in 2019, while Angola, Ecuador, Gabon and Indonesia have also departed in recent years, often due to disagreements over quotas.

Edited by: Ashutosh Pandey

Wednesday, April 29, 2026

  

Organisers of high-level climate summit in Colombia say 'we must transition away from fossil fuels'

Stientje van Veldhoven, Minister of Climate Policy and Green Growth of the Netherlands, embraces Colombia's Environmental Minister Irene Vélez Torres Tuesday, April 28, 2026.
Stientje van Veldhoven, Minister of Climate Policy and Green Growth of the Netherlands, embraces Colombia's Environmental Minister Irene Vélez Torres Tuesday, April 28, 2026. AP Photo/Ivan Valencia

By Emma De Ruiter
Published on 

The two-day segment of ministers and senior officials marks the political centerpiece of the First Conference on Transitioning away from Fossil Fuels, where more than 50 countries have been discussing how to move away from oil, gas and coal.

World leaders have gathered in Colombia's Santa Marta for the first-ever global talks to accelerate the shift away from fossil fuels, a step participating nations say is not just a climate priority but vital for energy independence.

The two-day summit of ministers and senior officials marks the political centerpiece of the First Conference on Transitioning away from Fossil Fuels, where more than 50 countries have been discussing how to move away from oil, gas and coal — the main drivers of global warming — toward cleaner energy.

The conference was announced last year after the official UN COP30 climate summit ended in Brazil, which failed to include an explicit reference to fossil fuels in its final deal.

The meeting reflects growing frustration among some governments and advocates that decades of UN climate negotiations have failed to directly address fossil fuel production, prompting the Santa Marta summit to push the issue outside formal talks.

Recent negotiations have acknowledged the need for a transition, but countries remain divided over how to implement it and how to finance the shift.

“The conclusion is unavoidable, we must transition away from fossil fuels — not just because it’s good for climate, but because it strengthens our energy independence and security,” said Stientje van Veldhoven, minister for climate policy and green growth for the Netherlands, which is co-hosting the conference with Colombia.

"We in Europe...are losing half a billion euros each day this war continues," the EU's climate envoy Wopke Hoekstra told delegates.

"We already had a very good reason to move on (from fossil fuels) for climate action...We now also have it for commercial reasons, and reasons of independence."

Energy independence in the wake of the Iran war

Organisers also say the Middle East war, which has throttled Gulf energy exports, has underscored the urgency of breaking fossil fuel dependence.

"Some people use independence, some people use sovereignty, but basically they need energy security," the UK's climate envoy Rachel Kyte told AFP in Santa Marta.

"Increasingly, the world is concluding that fossil fuels are a source of instability."

Even as record investments flow into renewable energy, scientists warn the pace is still too slow to keep global temperature rises to safer levels.

The world has already warmed about 1.4C above pre-industrial times and is tracking to blow past 1.5C in a matter of years.

Colombian President Gustavo Petro warned that “the Amazon rainforest is burning,” adding that “without it we reach a point of no return.”

He said UN climate talks have fallen short, arguing that “the unity of states has failed” and calling for broader action beyond governments.

Petro also linked current conflicts to energy dependence, saying “the wars we are seeing are driven by desperate geopolitical strategies around fossil resources.”

Activists participate in a demonstration during a conference aimed at transitioning away from fossil fuels Monday, April 27, 2026, in Santa Marta, Colombia. AP Photo/Ivan Valencia

Reducing reliance on fossil fuels a challenge

On the list of attendees are major fossil fuel producers Canada, Norway and Australia, and developing oil giants Nigeria, Angola and Brazil.

They join coal-reliant emerging markets Turkey and Vietnam, and small island nations extremely vulnerable to climate shocks, among others.

But the world's biggest emitters of greenhouse gases, including the United States, China and India, are not attending, nor are oil-rich Gulf states.

The conference is not expected to produce binding commitments but a set of proposals for countries wanting to gradually swap out fossil fuel production and consumption for cleaner forms of energy.

Activists participate in a demonstration during a conference aimed at transitioning away from fossil fuels Monday, April 27, 2026, in Santa Marta, Colombia. AP Photo/Ivan Valencia


This is a particular challenge for developing countries heavily reliant on oil and gas revenue, like hosts Colombia.

On Tuesday, France unveiled a fossil fuel "roadmap" setting deadlines to phase out coal by 2030, oil by 2045 and gas by 2050 for energy purposes.

Nations will discuss how to pursue these plans, as well as reforming fossil fuel subsidies that throw up barriers to renewable energy investment, among other issues.

Organizers say the conference is intended to build political momentum and bring together countries willing to accelerate the transition outside the formal UN process.

It is also seen as a steppingstone toward upcoming global climate negotiations, where financing and timelines for reducing fossil fuel use are expected to remain key points of debate.



EU backs ending new oil and gas drilling



By Marta Pacheco
Published on 

The war in the Middle East may have driven up oil and gas demand, but the world should still ditch new fossil fuel drilling, EU climate chief Wopke Hoekstra has said, insisting on "affordable, reliable, homegrown clean energy."

The world should end new fossil fuel drilling, EU Climate Action Commissioner Wopke Hoekstra has said, adding that global energy security depends on reducing oil and gas dependency.

Speaking on Tuesday at an international conference in Santa Marta, Colombia, aimed at quitting oil, gas and coal for good, the EU climate chief said that science-driven, measurable steps should be identified to support the transition from fossil fuels. "Science matters in climate change. And transitioning away from fossil fuels is a very tangible way to follow science," he said.

The First International Conference on Transitioning Away from Fossil Fuels, gathering 60 countries, including some major oil producers, comes at a timely moment.

Global demand for oil and natural gas has surged in the wake of the US-led war against Iran and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a vital trade passage. Nonetheless, the European Union insists that the long-term goal of clean power is more necessary than ever.

But as EU ministers scramble to secure supplies amid soaring energy prices, some countries are considering tapping their fossil fuel reserves for a rescue.

Even before the recent market disruptions, Greece issued its first offshore oil and gas exploration license in over four decades. Italy is also considering reviving offshore oil and gas exploration, which was suspended in 2019.

Rome and Berlin have also suggested a temporary return to coal to remedy soaring electricity prices.

However, Hoekstra said the clean energy transition remained the best long-term response. "We need to reduce our fossil fuel dependence for our energy security. We cannot be at the mercy of regimes holding up our resources," he said.

"As long as we rely on fossil fuels, we are vulnerable to volatility and external pressure. What is the answer? To double down on affordable, reliable, homegrown clean energy. To move faster towards a clean, electrified energy system. For climate, but also for security, resilience, competitiveness and independence."

Hoekstra called for a doubling of energy efficiency, a tripling of renewables by 2030 and more electrification to prevent vulnerabilities to price and supply shocks from global markets.

He also said that the annual United Nations COP climate meetings were not moving fast and far enough.

"We all know that the COP process is unfortunately not always delivering what it should. That means we need to improve that. But at the same time, we also need to ensure that we make the most of these plurilateral initiatives,” he said, as he thanked Brazil for tabling the initiative to transition away from fossil fuels at the COP30 last November.

Momentum for COP31

Denmark, Ireland, Portugal, Spain and the United Kingdom are among the European nations represented in Santa Marta, a global conference that was planned long before the conflict in the Middle East.

Rachel Kyte, the UK’s Special Representative for Climate, said the blocking of the Strait of Hormuz had forced countries around the world to pivot to clean energy, adding that the UK is eager to "support those wishing to drive forward their transitions to clean and secure energy."

“We have the experience of our transition to share and the recent experience of driving to energy security with our clean power mission," Kyte told Euronews.

Spanish Energy and Environment Minister Sara Aagesen hailed the Santa Marta gathering as a “success” that will generate alliances and consensus to sustain the momentum leading up to COP31 in Turkey.

“Fossil fuel dependency makes us incredibly vulnerable,” Aagesen said. "We need to bet on this clean energy agenda. We have our own success story, which has allowed us to be less dependent and more shielded from energy spike prices."

Seeking consensus among oil producers

Several major oil-producing nations, including Canada, Norway, Brazil and Nigeria, are taking part in Santa Marta. Others, such as the United States and Russia, were not invited due to what Colombia’s Environment Minister Irene Vélez Torres described as “openly extractivist” positions.

China, the world’s largest consumer of coal and oil, was also barred, as its status as the top global emitter would make commitments to phasing out fossil fuels particularly challenging, Torres noted.

Torres said the countries gathered in Santa Marta were a "coalition of the willing" intended to bypass the gridlock often caused by major fossil-fuel producers in UN climate talks.

Climate researchers at the Santa Marta event presented scientific workshops, including on the potential impact on public health and jobs in a world no longer reliant on fossil fuel production and use.

While no major new initiatives are expected to emerge from the meeting, the goal is to identify collective actions that would be difficult to achieve individually.

"We are opening a new chapter of global political discussion which, naturally, won't solve all the challenges on a single conference," Torres told reporters. "What matters here is the declaration of what we're willing to do to end fossil fuel dependency."


Europe revives renewables and nuclear to address the energy crisis

EU energy mix
Copyright euronews

By Evi Kiorri & Mert Can Yilmaz
Published on 

Brussels is looking for a long-term fix, putting both renewables and nuclear back on the table after the Strait of Hormuz closure sent energy bills soaring. Watch the video!

The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has caused energy prices to surge across Europe. Brussels states that the solution is to accelerate the permanent transition away from fossil fuels.

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen put the cost bluntly on April 13: €22 billion in additional fossil fuel import bills in just 44 days since the US-Iran conflict began, with no extra energy to show for it.

She recommends expanding renewables and nuclear, which already provide over 70% of Europe's electricity. However, the Commission identifies key challenges: limited storage, outdated grids, and wasted clean power. Brussels is expediting its grid modernisation package for implementation this summer.

Nuclear energy has returned to the forefront of the debate, with 15 member states supporting it through the European Nuclear Alliance. There is also growing momentum to deploy Small Modular Reactors in the early 2030s.

On April 22, the Commission announced an emergency package that includes coordinated EU gas storage, joint oil reserve releases, household income support, and expedited flexible state aid rules.

This marks Europe's second major energy crisis in three years. Brussels says that the objective is not to manage future shocks, but to prevent them.



France unveils roadmap to ditch all fossil


fuels by 2050


Santa Marta (Colombia) (AFP) – France on Tuesday announced a "first of its kind" plan to phase out coal by 2030, oil by 2045 and gas by 2050 during a global conference aimed at breaking reliance on fossil fuels.


Issued on: 29/04/2026 - RFI

French refinery workers strike outside TotalEnergies’ Donges site in western France, as France now sets deadlines to phase out coal by 2030, oil by 2045 and gas by 2050. AP - Jeremias Gonzalez

The "roadmap" was published as dozens of nations gather in Santa Marta, Colombia for the first-ever international talks on how to transition away from planet-heating fossil fuels.

France's roadmap does not present new pledges but brings existing climate and energy policies and targets under one umbrella with an explicit goal.

Analysts said no other country had published such a clear and comprehensive plan and it sent an important signal at a moment when countries are reassessing their reliance on fossil fuels.

France's envoy at the conference, Benoit Faraco, said the roadmap set deadlines for the end of fossil fuel use across the economy, the second-largest in Europe.

Coal would be phased out by 2030, oil by 2045 and gas by 2050 for energy purposes, the roadmap said.

"That's quite original, because we are probably one of the rarest countries who have a clear deadline for all fossil fuel energy," he told reporters in Santa Marta.

France generates a small fraction of its electricity from fossil fuels due to its extensive nuclear power capabilities. © CLEMENT MAHOUDEAU / AFP

France only generates a fraction of its electricity from hydrocarbons, thanks to its extensive nuclear power generation.

But Faraco said the roadmap also committed to phasing out fossil fuel production, electrifying sectors like heating and transport, and helping finance the transition in other countries.

It formalises France's existing targets for reducing greenhouse gas pollution – namely to reduce emissions by five percent a year over the 2024-2028 period with the goal of achieving carbon neutrality by 2050.

France's cuts to greenhouse gas emissions slowed for a second straight year in 2025 and remain well below what is needed to meet its climate goals.

First mover

Fossil fuel roadmaps differ to national pledges to reduce emissions or "net zero" plans because they have an explicit end goal, said Leo Roberts, an energy analyst at the E3G think tank.

The French roadmap "self describes itself as a document that sets out of a pathway for a country to transition the whole economy away from fossil fuels," Roberts told AFP in Santa Marta.

"In that sense, it is the first of its kind."

Faraco said France decided to push ahead on its own after a proposal for a global fossil fuel roadmap was blocked at the Cop30 climate summit in November.

Demonstrators hold signs supporting the oil industry outside the international conference on transitioning away from fossil fuels, in Santa Marta, Colombia © Raul ARBOLEDA / AFP

Brazil, which was steering the climate negotiations, agreed to pursue a voluntary roadmap process instead and has asked willing countries to make submissions.

Frustration at Cop30 led to the creation of the Santa Marta conference, which is taking place outside the UN process and is being co-hosted by Colombia and the Netherlands.

Nearly 60 nations are attending, from the European Union and major fossil fuel producers Canada and Norway, to developing oil giants Angola and Nigeria and small island developing states like Tuvalu.

Nations are not expected to produce any binding commitments but a set of proposals for countries wanting to move their own economies away from fossil fuel reliance.

The conference takes place against a backdrop of soaring fuel prices and a global supply crunch stemming from the Iran war, and energy security has been a prominent theme.


Colombia conference aims for ‘more honest conversation' to speed fossil fuel exit

More than 50 countries are meeting in Colombia on Tuesday to push forward plans for phasing out planet-heating fossil fuels – with new urgency driven by geopolitical tensions.



Issued on: 28/04/2026 - RFI

A worker at the Estelar Convention Center prepares for the Transitioning Away from Fossil Fuels conference in Santa Marta, Colombia. AFP - RAUL ARBOLEDA

The Transitioning Away from Fossil Fuels conference, held in the Caribbean city of Santa Marta and co-hosted by Colombia and the Netherlands, will see high-level talks between ministers and climate envoys on Tuesday and Wednesday.

It comes at a tense moment, amid volatility in global energy markets triggered by the conflict in the Middle East, underlining that the transition from fossil fuels is a strategic necessity as well as an environmental one.

Strategic invitations

Participants include EU member states – Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Germany. Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Spain, Sweden and France – as well as the United Kingdom, and Switzerland.

Countries from Africa, Asia and Latin America, plus small island nations on the front line of climate change, are also in attendance, as are several major fossil fuel producers with mixed climate records – including Australia, Canada, Norway, Brazil and Mexico.

Notably absent, however, are the United States, Saudi Arabia, Russia, China and India.

Colombia's Environment Minister Irene Velez takes part in an interview in Santa Marta, Colombia, on 26 April 2026, on the sidelines of the International Conference on the Just Transition Away from Fossil Fuels. AFP - RAUL ARBOLEDA

For Colombia’s Environment Minister Irene Velez Torres, who is spearheading the initiative, however, their absence is not a drawback.

"We didn’t expect those who are sceptical of a just transition programme to participate," she told RFI. "We invited countries that have recognised the importance and urgency of phasing out fossil fuels – in an orderly, just but also urgent manner."

By limiting participation to more committed players, organisers hope to foster what Velez Torres described as "a more honest conversation".

Analysts suggest this strategy could pay off.

Katerine Petersen of the E3G think tank argues the summit could create momentum that will eventually draw in more reluctant players.

"China doesn’t necessarily want to stay on the sidelines for long," she said. "The goal is to send the signal that this is a table where it’s strategically important to take a seat."

Financial support


A panel of leading scientists has been convened to support governments with evidence-based guidance. A preliminary report produced for the event outlines 12 possible actions, from halting new fossil fuel extraction projects to ending subsidies and tightening regulations on industry advertising.

Colombia is also using the platform to highlight its own efforts. Its government has stopped granting new hydrocarbon exploration contracts and is attempting to shift its economy away from extractive industries.

"We must now quickly replace the extractive economy with a productive economy based on other value chains," said Velez Torres. But she is candid about the scale of the challenge, noting the country still relies heavily on oil and coal revenues and must overhaul its fiscal system.

Developing nations need 'trillions' as climate finance takes centre stage at Cop28

The issue of finance looms large. Developing countries, in particular, say they cannot move forward without significant financial support.

"We cannot phase out fossil fuels without addressing the central question: who pays for the transition?" said Ryad Selmani of French NGO CCFD-Terre Solidaire, pointing to the continued profits of major energy companies.

Selma Huart of Oxfam France added that developing nations may need between $455 billion (€393 billion) and $2.4 trillion (€2 trillion) per year by 2030, compared with roughly $35 billion (€29 billion) currently available.

"Without massive, predictable, and accessible climate finance, the global phase-out of fossil fuels will remain out of reach," she warned.

Shifting global context

While no major binding agreements are expected to emerge, the conference aims to produce a report outlining practical solutions and areas of consensus ahead of the next United Nations climate summit in Turkey later this year.

We don’t expect this conference to solve all the problems," said Petersen. "But a clear outline of key actions could help countries align."

Disruptions to energy supply chains – such as the effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz – have provided added impetus, driving up oil prices and exposing vulnerabilities in fossil fuel dependence.

"There are other reasons to want to move away from fossil fuels: to be less vulnerable to these crises," said climate policy researcher Nicolas Berghmans.

Around 60 countries have introduced measures linked to electrification or energy demand reduction since the latest Middle East crisis began, while others have moved to cushion consumers through subsidies or tax cuts.

The debate is increasingly framed in terms of security as well as sustainability. "Moving away from fossil fuels is not an ideological choice, but a strategic necessity," said Gaia Febvre of Climate Action Network.

Even traditionally cautious governments are adapting their message. In the UK, Energy Secretary Ed Miliband recently argued that "the era of security based on fossil fuels is over".

Rising demand

Despite growing investment in clean energy – now roughly double that of fossil fuels – coal, oil and gas still account for more than 80 percent of global energy use. Demand continues to rise, meaning new energy sources often add to, rather than replace, existing ones.

Many countries remain dependent on fossil fuels, while others still see them as a pathway to development.

Kumi Naidoo, head of the Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty Initiative, challenges that logic.

Investing in new fossil fuel infrastructure, he argues, risks locking countries into costly and ultimately unsustainable systems. "They will end up with stranded assets… and a worse economic situation," he said.

For Velez Torres, this week's conference's aim is to ensure countries "decide that the time has come to radically advance an ecological agenda on energy and transition".

This article has been adapted from the original version in French by Géraud Bosman-Delzons,

Tuesday, April 28, 2026

UAE Exits OPEC, Casting Shadow Over the Oil Cartel's Future

ADNOC
Press handout image courtesy ADNOC

Published Apr 28, 2026 1:06 PM by The Maritime Executive

 

The United Arab Emirates has announced a decision to leave the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), a major blow to the supply cartel that has exerted influence over global oil prices since 1960. 

"The UAE’s decision to exit from OPEC reflects a policy-driven evolution aligned with long-term market fundamentals," said UAE energy minister Suhail Mohamed Al Mazrouei in a statement. "We thank OPEC and its member countries for decades of constructive cooperation. We remain committed to energy security, providing reliable, responsible, and lower-carbon supply while supporting stable global markets."

The UAE has been a member of OPEC for nearly 60 years, and is one of its most important swing producers. Like Saudi oilfields, the UAE's wells can vary their production rates without suffering long-term damage, giving national oil company ADNOC the ability to increase or decrease output as desired to affect global supply levels - and influence global prices. But in recent years, Emirati leaders have chafed at the restrictions that OPEC places on their ability to make sovereign decisions about export sales, and tensions have been brewing for some time. While the announcement of the country's exit was sudden, it was not unexpected. 

"The country wants to increase output capacity and actually use it, rather than keep production capped, especially after the war ends and Hormuz [opens]," commented UAE-based Middle East energy analyst Amena Bakr, a senior researcher at Kpler. "The UAE is positioning itself as a more flexible, market-responsive producer and wants to tap into the capacity it’s invested in without constraints."

The move may strengthen the UAE's earning potential, and give it more flexibility to invest in pipeline capacity to loading ports on the Gulf of Oman - a desperately-needed backup, since Iran has demonstrated an ability to close the Strait of Hormuz to Emirati tanker traffic. ADNOC maintains a pipeline to Fujairah for export of its regional benchmark Dubai grade, but it is not large enough to accommodate full-rate production; this has forced the UAE to curtail output by shutting in wells, an undesirable choice that will take months to reverse when the conflict ends. 

For OPEC, the UAE's exit is a blow, warns Bakr. For now it will have little market effect, as much of OPEC's output is already trapped west of Hormuz and there is little prospect of increasing supply in the near term. But the Emirates were the third-largest producer in the bloc, and their swing capacity made them an influential member. "It shakes group cohesion and makes everyone wonder who will leave next," Bakr said in a social media post. "Is this the end of market management?"


UAE announces its withdrawal from OPEC

UAE announces its withdrawal from OPEC
/ bne IntelliNewsFacebook
By bnm Gulf bureau April 28, 2026

The United Arab Emirates has announced its withdrawal from OPEC and the broader OPEC+ alliance, effective May 1, 2026, stripping the cartel of one of its highest-capacity and lowest-cost producers.

According to Emirates News Agency (WAM), the decision stems from the UAE's long-term strategic and economic vision, including accelerating investment in domestic energy production. The country joined OPEC in 1967 through the Emirate of Abu Dhabi and continued its membership following the federation's establishment in 1971. Still, UAE Energy Minister Suhail Al Mazroui affirmed in a press statement that the decision was taken unilaterally, with no input from Saudi Arabia or other countries.

The UAE has increasingly chafed under OPEC+ production constraints in recent years, having secured a higher baseline quota in 2021 following a protracted dispute with Saudi Arabia. Abu Dhabi National Oil Company (ADNOC) has since pushed aggressively toward a production capacity target of 5mn barrels per day by 2027, a trajectory difficult to reconcile with the coordinated output cuts that have defined OPEC+ policy since 2022.

The Emirates News Agency (WAM) cited ongoing near-term geopolitical volatility in the Arabian Gulf and disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz as additional factors informing the timing, framing the withdrawal as a response to market need rather than a departure from cooperative principles. The UAE will continue gradually increasing production in line with demand and market conditions following its exit.

The departure raises immediate questions about cohesion within OPEC+, where Saudi Arabia has shouldered a disproportionate share of voluntary cuts. With the UAE now free to produce at will, pressure on other members to reassess their own quota commitments is likely to intensify ahead of the group's next ministerial meeting.

"The UAE withdrawal marks a significant shift for OPEC. Alongside Saudi Arabia, it is one of the few members with meaningful spare capacity, the mechanism through which the group exerts market influence," Rystad Energy analyst Jorge Leon told Reuters.

“While ‌near-term effects may be muted given ongoing disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz, the longer-term implication is a structurally weaker OPEC. Outside the group, the UAE would have both the incentive and the ability to increase production, raising broader questions about the sustainability of Saudi Arabia’s role as the market’s central stabiliser, and pointing to a potentially more volatile oil market as OPEC’s capacity to smooth supply imbalances diminishes," Leon concluded.

United Arab Emirates says it will leave OPEC in a blow to the oil cartel




The logo of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) is seen outside of OPEC's headquarters in Vienna, Austria, March 3, 2022. (AP Photo/Lisa Leutner)



Updated: 

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates — The United Arab Emirates said Tuesday it will leave OPEC effective May 1, stripping the oil cartel of its third-largest producer and further weakening its leverage over global oil supplies and prices.

The UAE’s decision had been rumored as a possibility for some time, as it pushed back in recent years against OPEC production quotas it felt had been too low — meaning it wasn’t able to sell as much oil to the world as it had wanted.

“Having invested heavily in expanding energy production capacity in recent years, the bigger picture is that the UAE has been itching to pump more oil,” Capital Economics wrote in an analysis. “The ties binding OPEC members together have loosened,” it said, particularly after Qatar withdrew from the cartel in 2019.

Regional politics are also likely at play. The UAE has had increasingly frosty relations with Saudi Arabia, OPEC’s largest producer, over political and economic matters in the Mideast, even after both came under attack by fellow OPEC member Iran during the war.

No immediate impact likely for world oil markets

The UAE’s withdrawal from OPEC won’t necessarily have any immediate effects in markets. That’s because world oil supplies are sharply constrained by the war in Iran, which has closed off the Strait of Hormuz, a waterway through which one-fifth of global oil supplies — including much of the UAE’s — is transported. On Tuesday, Brent crude, the international benchmark, traded above US$111 a barrel, or more than 50 per cent above its prewar price.


OPEC accounts for roughly 40 per cent of the world’s oil output, but its market power had been waning in recent years as the United States ramped up production. While Saudi Arabia had been producing more than 10 million barrels of oil a day before the war, the U.S. pumps more than 13 million barrels a day.

U.S. President Donald Trump has been a steady critic of the cartel during his two terms in the White House.

The UAE, which joined OPEC through its emirate of Abu Dhabi in 1967, had been producing around 3.4 million barrels of crude a day just before the U.S.-Israeli war with Iran began on Feb. 28. Analysts say it has capacity to produce roughly 5 million barrels a day.

In its announcement on Tuesday, made via its state-run WAM news agency, the UAE said it also would leave the wider OPEC+ group, which Russia had led to try to stabilize oil prices.

“This decision reflects the UAE’s long-term strategic and economic vision and evolving energy profile, including accelerated investment in domestic energy production,” the UAE said, adding that it would bring “additional production to market in a gradual and measured manner, aligned with demand and market conditions.”


The UAE’s withdrawal removes one of OPEC’s few members with the ability to quickly increase production, said Jorge Leon, head of geopolitical analysis at Rystad Energy.

“A structurally weaker OPEC, with less spare capacity concentrated within the group, will find it increasingly difficult to calibrate supply and stabilize prices,” he said.


Saudi Arabia, UAE increasingly at odds

Saudi Arabia and the UAE increasingly have competed over economic issues and regional politics, particularly in the Red Sea area. The two countries had jointly fought against Yemen’s Iran-backed Houthi rebels in 2015. However, that coalition broke down into recriminations in late December, when Saudi Arabia bombed what it described as a weapons shipment bound for Yemeni separatists backed by the UAE.

As tensions rose in recent months, Saudi broadcasters long based in Dubai, the economic hub of the UAE, have pulled back to the kingdom.

“This exit of OPEC fits into the UAE need for flexibility with key energy consumers as well -- including a future relationship with China and a more competitive relationship with Saudi Arabia,” said Karen Young, a senior research scholar at Columbia University’s Center on Global Energy Policy.

While Saudi Arabia and OPEC had no immediate reaction, Emirati Energy Minister Suhail al-Mazrouei insisted his country’s decision did not stem from any dispute with its Gulf neighbor.

“We’ve been working together for years and years. We have the highest respect for the Saudis for leading OPEC,” al-Mazrouei told CNBC.

However, the UAE sent its foreign minister rather than its ruler to a Gulf Arab leaders’ meeting held Tuesday in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, hosted by Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.

The UAE hosted the United Nations COP28 climate talks in 2023, a conference that ended for the first time with a pledge by nearly 200 countries to move away from planet-warming fossil fuels. But the UAE still plans to increase its production capacity in the coming years, even as it pursues more clean energy at home, a move decried by climate activists.

“The demand for power is going to go up and up and up,” U.S. Interior Secretary Doug Burgum told an Abu Dhabi oil conference in November. “Today’s the day to announce that there is no energy transition. There is only energy addition.”

He drew widespread applause from his Emirati hosts.

___

Jon Gambrell, The Associated Press

Associated Press writer David McHugh in Frankfurt, Germany, contributed to this report.

What is OPEC+ and how does it affect oil prices?


ByReuters
Published: April 28, 2026 

A general view of Isfahan Refinery, one of the largest refineries in Iran and is considered as the first refinery in the country in terms of diversity of petroleum products in Isfahan, Iran on November 08, 2023. The products of this refinery include liquefied gas, gasoline, gas oil, aviation fuel types, kerosene, solvents, crude oil and sulfur. (Photo by Fatemeh Bahrami/Anadolu via Getty Images)

LONDON - The United Arab Emirates, one of OPEC+’s largest producers, will leave the oil producers’ alliance on May 1, it said on Tuesday.

The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and allies, including Russia, are known collectively as OPEC+. Last year, the group produced nearly 50 per cent of the world’s oil and oil liquids, according to International Energy Agency estimates. The UAE is the fourth largest producer in OPEC+.

Below are facts about OPEC+ and its role.RELATED: United Arab Emirates says it will leave OPEC in a blow to the oil cartel
What are OPEC and OPEC+?

OPEC was founded in 1960 in Baghdad by Iraq, Iran, Kuwait, Venezuela and Saudi Arabia with the aims of coordinating petroleum policies and securing fair and stable prices. Today, it includes 12 countries, mainly from the Middle East. The UAE joined in 1967.

The UAE is the fourth producer to leave the group in recent years, and by far the biggest. Angola, which joined OPEC in 2007, quit the bloc at the start of 2024, citing disagreements over production levels. Ecuador quit OPEC in 2020 and Qatar in 2019.


The group produced over half of global crude in the 1970s, according to Reuters calculations, before the onset of non-OPEC supply sources such as the North Sea.

In later decades, OPEC’s share stood at between 30 per cent and 40 per cent but record output growth from rivals such as the United States has steadily eaten into that share.

OPEC in 2016 sought to regain influence by forming an alliance with 10 non-members, including Russia, which it called OPEC+.

As a result, its market share increased to around 51.15 million bpd, or nearly 50 per cent of global oil and oil liquids production, in 2025, according to the International Energy Agency. In March, a month into the Iran war, that share fell to about 44 per cent.
U.S.-Iran war reduces UAE production

Before the start of the U.S.-Iran war at the end of February, the UAE was producing 3.3 million bpd and had capacity to be able to produce as much as 4.5-5.0 million bpd of crude and oil liquids.

Its importance in OPEC in the past was increased because, together with leading OPEC member Saudi Arabia, it had spare capacity that it could add to the market if required.

That has become academic since the unprecedented oil market disruption caused by the effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz since the Iran war.

Gulf OPEC+ crude oil production fell by nearly 8 million barrels per day in March versus February as Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Kuwait and Iraq cut output, according to OPEC.


The cuts were necessary because they were limited in how much they could export, although both have some ability to bypass the Strait of Hormuz.

Saudi Arabia has a 7 million bpd pipeline to the Red Sea while the UAE can export 1.5-1.8 million bpd through a pipeline to the port of Fujairah.
OPEC and global oil prices

OPEC+ says it cuts and raises oil production to balance the markets.

Its critics say the group manipulates prices, which OPEC denies.

During the 1973 Arab-Israeli War, Arab members of OPEC imposed an embargo against the United States in retaliation for its decision to re-supply the Israeli military, as well as other countries that supported Israel. The embargo banned petroleum exports to those nations.

The oil embargo pressured an already strained U.S. economy that had grown dependent on imported oil. Oil prices jumped, causing high fuel costs for consumers and fuel shortages. The embargo also brought the United States and other countries to the brink of a global recession.

U.S. President Donald Trump has accused the organization of “ripping off the rest of the world” by inflating oil prices. Trump has also linked U.S. military support to the Gulf with oil prices, saying that while the U.S. defends OPEC members, they “exploit this by imposing high oil prices.”

However, it was Trump who helped to convince OPEC+ to cut output in 2020 during the COVID pandemic as crude oil prices slumped and U.S. oil producers suffered.

In 2025, OPEC crude exports accounted for about 47 per cent of global crude seaborne exports, according to Kpler. In March, that share shrunk to 34.7 per cent, Kpler data show.
Which countries are OPEC members?

The current members of OPEC are: Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Iraq, Iran, Algeria, Libya, Nigeria, Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon and Venezuela. The UAE said it would leave the group on May 1.

Non-OPEC countries in the global alliance of OPEC+ are represented by Russia, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Bahrain, Brunei, Malaysia, Mexico, Oman, South Sudan, Sudan and Brazil, which joined in early 2025.

Sources: Reuters News, World Economic Forum website, OPEC website, U.S. Department of State website, the International Energy Agency.

Reporting by Ahmad Ghaddar and Yousef Saba; Editing by Barbara Lewis.