Showing posts sorted by date for query BDS. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query BDS. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Tuesday, September 10, 2024

Cal State Professors Targeted for Exposing School’s Ties to Israel’s Genocide in Gaza

 

September 10, 2024
Facebook

Cal State Long Beach pro-Palestine protest, May 2, 2024. Photo by Ben Huff.

Last month, in a tangible victory for the BDS (Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions) movement, San Francisco State University (SFSU) agreed to pull its investment from four companies tied to weapons manufacturing and Israel’s genocide in Gaza. The four include Lockheed Martin, aerospace company Leonardo, military contractor Palantir, and construction equipment maker Caterpillar, whose bulldozers have been tearing up Gaza and the West Bank for decades. The success was four years in the making, as SFSU students successfully passed a divestment resolution in 2020.

“I want to thank all the work group participants who dedicated time this summer to the creation of this plan, including the representatives from Students for Gaza and members of our Investment Committee,” said SFSU Vice President Jeff Jackanicz.

While the sun may be setting on SFSU’s complicity in Israel’s genocidal mayhem, the situation isn’t as pleasant at Cal State Long Beach (CSULB), the second-largest school in California’s Cal State system, despite that students passed a similar divestment resolution in 2017. School administrators have done their best to stifle criticism of Israel and recently went as far as to send an email warning five faculty members for allegedly violating the school’s 2023-2024 “Time, Place, Manner” (TPM) rules by using a megaphone and a microphone at a Palestinian solidarity protest. While students have been cited in the past, this appears to be the first time professors have been accused of violating the policy.

As college protests erupted around the country, over 500 pro-Palestine activists and dozens of faculty at CSULB held a teach-in on May 2. While many other faculty spoke at the peaceful teach-in on a megaphone, only five were targeted for their participation. The professors, all members of CSULB FJP, are predominantly faculty of color and disproportionately Muslim. They include Araceli Esparza, Professor of English; Jake Alimahomed-Wilson, Professor of Sociology; Azza Basarudin, Associate Professor of Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies; Sabrina Alimahomed-Wilson, Professor of Sociology, and Steven Osuna, Associate Professor of Sociology. 

“We were all hired because of our academic training in questions of race and racism both in the US and abroad and we are now being targeted for drawing on our expertise to take a stand against militarism and genocide in Gaza, suggesting that our viewpoints are only welcome if administrators agree with us,” explains Prof. Araceli Esparza. “As scholars focused on US empire and colonialism, we are taking the only ethical position available to us at this moment of US-supported genocidal violence in Gaza and we will continue to call for an end to the genocide against the people of Palestine all while facing attempts to repress our constitutionally protected rights to free speech and academic freedom.”

The professors, whose supporters are calling “the CSU-5,” appear to have been targeted, not because they amplified their voices at a campus protest but because, along with another faculty member, they co-wrote a critical piece for Mondoweiss and CounterPunch. The sixth professor did not speak at the May 2nd protest.

The widely read piece exposed CSULB’s ties to Boeing and other defense contractors’ complicity in Israel’s genocide against Palestinians. In their essay, “Boeing University: How the California State University Became Complicit in Palestinian Genocide,” the faculty writes:

Despite its complicity in occupation and genocide, Boeing has had a long and financially reciprocal relationship with CSULB, one going back decades with its latest iteration being touted as CSULB’s “Boeing Partnership.” CSULB is one of just 16 universities nationwide – and the sole university in California – to be selected by the Boeing Company for an exclusive university partnership. The Boeing Partnership is a university-corporate alliance that has further transformed CSULB into a public relations mouthpiece for the defense contractor. The CSULB-Boeing partnership illustrates not only how defense contractors such as Boeing, Raytheon, and Northrop Grumman profit from Israel’s violence against Palestinians, but also how these massive corporations simultaneously undermine the mission of public universities by harming students domestically and facilitating genocide, militarism, and mass death abroad.

CSULB President Jane Close Conoley has a lengthy track record of stifling criticism of Israel on campus. During the 2017 student senate vote on divestment, Conoley penned an op-ed for the school’s newspaper condemning the resolution to divest from corporations with direct ties to the Palestinian occupation and genocide. At the time, faculty members argued that Conoley had a “chilling effect” on free speech by inserting herself into the debate. Despite the resolution passing (15, 7, 1) in a roll call vote, Conoley effectively killed the legislation by refusing to enforce it. What did Conoley get for silencing the divestment vote? Recognition for her excellent work from the Orange County/Long Beach branch of the pro-Israel Anti-Defamation League (ADL) later that year.

“Since coming to Long Beach as president, I have been blessed with many recognitions (e.g., from LAEDC, ADL, NAACP), which both humbled me and made me proud,” Conoley told the Long Beach Business Journal in 2018.

The fact that Conoley is cozy with the ADL should be cause for concern. The organization deems nearly all opposition to Israel, including divestment, as anti-semitism. Early this year, ADL President Jonathan Greenblatt dangerously claimed that Jewish Voice for Peace (JVP) and Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) are “Iranian proxies” equivalent to Hezbollah. Unsurprisingly, like the ADL’s Greenblatt, President Conoley believes pro-Palestine protests on college campuses are in “support of the awful terror attacks on Israel by Hamas.”

Conoley makes good money squelching pro-Palestine voices from her campus perch while she oversees the crackdown on the free speech of students and faculty protesting genocide. In 2022, she made $479,505, a 7% jump from 2021. In addition to her salary, she enjoys luxury housing that is paid for by the university.

“[While] Conoley has used her platform for many years to freely express her pro-Israel perspective without any fear of retaliation or harassment, unfortunately, this has not been the case for pro-Palestine faculty and students,” claims Prof. Jake Alimahomed-Wilson. “In contrast, we face increasing hostility, harassment, and apparently now an unequal enforcement of the university’s restrictive Time, Place, and Manner policy when we exercise our constitutionally protected speech to oppose the ongoing genocide in Gaza.”

Conoley also recently spoke at an ADL co-sponsored event last April called “Shining a Light,” where she addressed the crackdown on alleged campus antisemitism.

The Southern California branch of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has condemned the targeting of the CSU-5. In a letter to Patricia A. Pérez, Associate Vice President of Faculty Affairs, ACLU free speech staff attorney Jonathan Markovitz argues, “[the university’s] policy very likely violates the First Amendment and Liberty of Speech Clause of the California Constitution … I am also concerned by the possibility that the University may have sent the warning … because of disapproval with their political positions, or with the fact that they have been outspoken in defense of Palestinian rights in the past.”

Sadly, CSULB isn’t the only school working to silence students speaking out against the genocide in Gaza. Last week, two Columbia University student protestors were arrested, and several other Columbia faculty members were targeted, including Jewish law Prof. Katherine Franke, who is now facing termination. Columbia banned JVP and SJP chapters from campus, and NYU (my alma mater) has opened over 180 disciplinary cases against pro-Palestine students and faculty. The list goes on…

It doesn’t seem to matter that the actions of these universities are antithetical to the very project of academia. “Academic freedom protects and nurtures the intellectual pursuit of knowledge and justice,” says CSULB Associate Prof. Azza Basarudi. “We are guided by the principle that knowledge production is inherently critical of colonial and imperial projects and repressive power structures.”

In addition to notifying faculty that they had allegedly violated the TPM policy, students must also abide by the rules of a new interim TPM. On August 19, Cal State’s Chancellor’s Office sent a system-wide email to all 23 California State Universities stating that no encampments would be allowed on campus. Students are now prohibited from blocking access to buildings or wearing face coverings to conceal their identities. While the TPM immediately applies to Cal State students, the updated TPM does not impact faculty until their union, the California Faculty Association (CFA), meets and confers with university management. Implementing this TPM before the union agrees to the policy changes, say CFA representatives, violates California’s Higher Education Employer-Employee Relations Act (HEERA).

However, the CSU-5 is being accused of violating the old 2023-2024 TPM in what they believe is apparent retaliation for their piece on Cal State Long Beach’s ties to Boeing.

“There cannot be a Palestine exception to academic freedom,” adds Prof. Azza Basarudim, who admits they won’t stop until the genocide stops. “The university’s role is to support faculty and students, not to give in to pressure and interference from external donors, corporations, alums, and political lobbyists.”

If there’s a silver lining to all of these attacks on free speech, it’s that efforts to stifle dissent are only likely to backfire and reinvigorate the pro-Palestine movement on college campuses. As long as children continue to be killed in Gaza and blood is shed in the West Bank, a new generation of students and professors of conscience like the CSU-5 will rise to pressure their employers to sever ties with industries that profit from genocide.

JOSHUA FRANK is the managing editor of CounterPunch and co-host of CounterPunch Radio. He is the author of the new book, Atomic Days: The Untold Story of the Most Toxic Place in America, published by Haymarket Books. He can be reached at joshua@counterpunch.org. You can troll him on Twitter @joshua__frank.

Sunday, September 08, 2024

Green Party Conference votes to declare Israel’s actions in Gaza a ‘genocide’
Today
Left Foot Forward
Green Politics News

The Green Party also reiterated its support for the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement



Members of the Green Party of England and Wales have today voted to declare Israel’s actions in the assault on Gaza a ‘genocide’. Alongside this, members backed branding Israel an ‘apartheid’ regime.

Party members overwhelmingly voted for a motion which said the Green Party “reaffirms its commitment to international law and promoting equality and human rights of the Palestinian people.”

The motion was proposed by a number of high profile party members including Croydon Councillor Ria Patel and the party’s equality and diversity coordinator Kefentse Dennis.

In addition to branding Israel’s actions ‘genocide’, the motion reiterated the Green Party’s longstanding support for the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement.

The motion read: “We affirm our commitment to explicitly supporting BDS in our internal and external communications going forward.

“Supporting the BDS movement is essential to holding Israel accountable, to supporting Palestinians’ rights to equality and self-determination, and to demonstrating that our support, as a nation, is not performative.”

Chris Jarvis is head of strategy and development at Left Foot Forward

This article is jointly published with Bright Green


Green Party's Gaza stance won over Muslim voters - now they hope their progressive policies will keep them

The Green Party won four MPs at the general election, with lots of its new support coming from the Muslim community due to its stance on Gaza.


Serena Barker-Singh
Political correspondent @serenabarksing
SKY NEWS
Sunday 8 September 2024 
The Green Party under co-leaders Adrian Ramsay and Carla Denyer won four MPs at the election


The Green Party had a very good general election and they know it.

Alongside their hemp tote bags and multi-use water bottles this weekend, there was a palpable sense of renewed enthusiasm at their annual conference.

They were not shy about where some of their two million votes came from. Soaring numbers of British Muslims voted Green this election and helped the party secure four new MPs. And this weekend felt as if they wanted to build on that support.

It was no secret, even before the election, that some British Muslims had begun to lose trust in Labour over its early stance on the Israel-Gaza war.

This anti-Labour sentiment was galvanised through efficient organising by campaign groups like "The Muslim Vote" which had begun a campaign to try to funnel votes away from the major parties and towards the candidates they believed better served the Muslim community.

While there is a wide diversity of Muslim voters, and huge complexities in how different communities vote, the biggest uniting factor that focused minds around voting was undoubtedly the community's dismay at Israel's bombing of Gaza.

Looking on from afar were the Greens. The Greens were all too happy to fill Labour's space.

Sir Keir Starmer with Thangam Debbonaire during a visit to Bristol Rovers FC. Pic: PA

Sky polling just ahead of the election discovered a slight "Gaza effect", which showed leader satisfaction levels for the Conservatives and Labour significantly dropping after 7 October amongst ethnic minority voters, with IPSOS suggesting they were moving towards smaller parties.

If anywhere showed that most visibly on election night, it was Bristol Central where the Greens won its biggest scalp of the night.


Thangam Debbonaire, a big beast in the Labour Party and the shadow culture secretary, lost her seat of Bristol Central - where there is a significant Somali community - to the Greens co-leader Carla Denyer.

Sir Keir Starmer even visited the constituency throughout the election, in perhaps a sign that the party knew her campaign needed heavyweight support.

Where the Greens came a strong second and third place in constituencies around places like Sheffield Central and in east London, data showed they were in areas with large Muslim populations.


The Green Party under co-leaders Adrian Ramsay and Carla Denyer. Pic: AP

This weekend, the Greens chose their one media visit outside the conference to visit a mosque in the Tory town of Altrincham to highlight community engagement. The focus? Gaza.

In his speech, Zach Polanski, the Greens deputy leader, called the situation in Gaza a "genocide" - something Israel has repeatedly denied - and pushed Labour to stop arms sales completely to Israel, instead of just the 30 out of 350 arms export licences they suspended earlier this week.

I asked the Green's co-leader Adrian Ramsay whether this was part of a strategic play for more votes.

"I particularly wanted to make sure I was visiting the mosque, engaging with the Muslim community because we have to remember how much our Muslim communities around the country have felt targeted, felt vulnerable by the horrific events and disorder from political violence during the summer," he said.

"We do need to stand together, and we also need to stand together with our Jewish and Muslim communities who feel vulnerable because of what's happening in the Middle East"

Fesl Reza-Khan set up the Muslim Greens

Fesl Reza-Khan, a new party member who signed up in November because of the party's stance on Gaza, co-created a Muslim Greens group to organise activists across the UK.

"A lot of us are from ethnic minority backgrounds. My parents are from South Asia, when we see something, it's instinctive," he said.

"And what I see in Gaza, I think: 'Hang on, that's happened to me, that's happened to my forefathers, that whole occupation, exploitation, colonisation'.

"That's what was instinctive and none of the parties were acknowledging it, they were actually gaslighting me, telling me, 'that's not happening, that's not what I'm seeing'.

"And I don't need to be told what I'm seeing and witnessing."

For lots of ethnic minorities, the Green Party is not a natural home.

Out of the hundreds of councillors the Greens secured in the latest local elections, fewer than a dozen are ethnic minorities. They know their image is one of the "crusty old Green member", as one insider told me.

They're keen to modernise, to capitalise on what they see as the hegemony of the major political parties, and they think this is a good way to start.

"We just needed an attentive audience, just one door to open, Gaza has been that defining moment," Mr Reza-Khan said.

"So now that people are listening, they're realising actually, the Greens are about far more than just Gaza, they're actually very, very good on so many issues, from families, to cost of living to transport."


Green Party to demand wealth tax

The party hope with thousands more members in the party, some will stay for their stance on other progressive issues, most recently trying to set themselves against Labour on the two-child benefit cap and its changes to the winter fuel payments.

In the 2017 election, the Green party saw its support drop by more than half as some of their voters turned to more radical politics under Labour's then-leader, Jeremy Corbyn.

And if the 2024 general election taught us anything, it was that voters can be flaky.

Co-leaders Carla Denyer and Adrian Ramsay are hoping their strong election performance is a good foundation to build into longer-lasting support and they are starting with communities they think are most disaffected with mainstream politics.


Green Party conference votes to support immediate ban on greyhound racing

Chris Jarvis
8 September 2024


At their autumn conference in Manchester on September 8, Green Party members voted to support an immediate ban on greyhound racing and the use of the whip in horse racing.

In backing a motion on the issue, members also supported a compulsory levy to be imposed on all betting, to be used solely for welfare improvements, and a single regulatory authority to enforce animal welfare standards.

Speaking following the decision, the Green Party’s co-leader Adrian Ramsay said: “We are the first party to pledge to ban greyhound racing, a position supported by the RSPCA, Dog’s Trust, Blue Cross, and a majority of the public.

“Preventing greyhounds from being raced for the benefit of the betting industry and commercial gain would bring an end to the unnecessary deaths and suffering of these dogs.

“Approximately 200 horses die every year from horse racing. Banning the use of the whip is a basic step for animal welfare. Equally the horse racing industry needs to answer how it will stop the shocking number of deaths it’s industry causes that no one wants to see.

“These measures would also help reduce the harm caused by problem gambling.”

This article was jointly published with Left Foot Forward

Image credit: Jon Craig – Creative Commons



Greens co-leader: UK riots were 'racist and Islamophobic'


Evening Standard
Sep 8, 2024

Green Party co-leader Adrian Ramsay has visited a mosque in Manchester and speaks to members and trustees of the Altrincham & Hale Muslim Association. He said he wanted to make sure he engaged with the Muslim community during his party conference because it felt targeted and vulnerable during the recent riots. He said "We need to stand together" and termed the recent UK riots "racist and Islamophobic".