Showing posts sorted by date for query CHEETAH. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query CHEETAH. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Friday, February 06, 2026

 

Ancient American pronghorns were built for speed




U-M study shows American pronghorns evolved for speed long before the American cheetah arrived on the scene





University of Michigan





ANN ARBOR—The fastest land animal in North America is the American pronghorn, and previously, researchers thought it evolved its speed because of pressure from the now-extinct American cheetah.

But recently, that theory has come under fire. Now, a University of Michigan study examining fossilized ankle bones of ancient relatives of the American pronghorn has shown that the pronghorn was evolving to be faster more than 5 million years before the American cheetah appeared on the continent. The study, supported by the Michigan Society of Fellows and the U-M Rackham Graduate School, is published in the Journal of Mammalogy.

"There was a long-standing idea that pronghorn are so much faster than every predator in North America because of a predator-prey arms race between the pronghorn and the American cheetah," said U-M paleontologist Anne Kort and co-author of the study. "What our work was able to add to this story was that not only was the American cheetah not as cheetah-like as previously thought, but that pronghorn have this build for running that existed well before the American cheetah came about."

The researchers say this sheds light on how current artiodactyl relatives—artiriodactyls include camels, cows, deer and antelopes—and other mammals may adapt as humans push farther into wild landscapes and as the climate warms. First author Fabian Hardy, assistant professor at Slippery Rock University, says the findings have implications for how we develop future wildlife and livestock management practices, as well as conservation practices.

"This tells us something about what animals are going to succeed going forward, and where we are going to find them. Is the modern pronghorn going to continue throughout the region that it's found in now?" said Hardy, who completed the work as a graduate student and postdoctoral researcher at U-M. "They're still traveling long distances. They were set up for that 12 million years ago. So they'll probably do all right, even with urbanization and fragmentation, because they can move around efficiently."

The study focused on fossils found in the Mojave Desert's Dove Spring Formation, which was deposited from 8 million to 12.5 million years ago. During this time, the region underwent great environmental change. In a valley called the El Paso Basin, the landscape shifted from once unbroken forest into a patchy mosaic of woodlands separated by more arid grasslands. 

Examining the ankle bones of early pronghorn relatives, the researchers expected to see the bones shorten in comparison to the point of rotation of the ankle. This would suggest that they adapted to traveling efficiently across grasslands and between patches of forest. Instead, the researchers found that their ankle bones, specifically a blocky bone in the middle of the joint called the astragalus, remained unchanged. This suggests the pronghorns were able to move between patches of forest effectively rather than adapt to open grassland.

Working in a fossil assemblage from a geologic epoch called the Miocene, Hardy collected a range of bones from a span of about 4 million years. He met with Kort, who studies the interaction between environmental change and mammals' locomotor adaptations, to develop a project centered around them.

"From about 30 million years ago to present, we see mammals becoming increasingly cursorial, which means they're adapted to running," Kort said. "I was curious to see if you could detect that in this kind of smaller scale pattern of drying and opening environments."

The researchers compared the astragalus using a study that had been done on modern artiodactyls such as antelope and cows. That study showed that these animals, which lived in an open habitat, had a shorter astragalus, adapted for efficient running.

"We expected to see longer astragali in the beginning, and then it would transition to more running-adapted astragali in the end. But we did not find that," Kort said. "Instead, what we found was a community that just stays the same through the whole section."

The pronghorn relatives, which were the size of a slender, long-legged beagle, were large enough that they could move in and out of the El Paso Basin, Kort said, seeking patches of forest elsewhere that were still suitable habitat.

"Our guess is that they could just move around to compensate for this aridification and landscape change," Kort said.

Although the astragalus had not changed over the time period Kort and Hardy were examining, they did show evidence of already adapting to running—5 million years before the cheetah appeared. In fact, the earlier pronghorns have "effectively the same ankle ratio as the modern pronghorn. So they're really built very similarly, and really built for speed well before this American cheetah shows up," Kort said.

Eventually, toward the end of the Miocene, the small pronghorns died off—perhaps as a result of a "tipping point" in the ecosystem that led to irrevocable changes in the ecosystem.

"It's easy to expect evolution and this gradual change over time, but I think this idea that you might not even see a problem until it's too late is a good reminder of how these things work," Kort said. "Our findings also may provide contextual information for biologists who are in wildlife management and doing direct conservation. They may not directly use it, but it's almost like having a historical context to understand a political problem."

Thursday, January 15, 2026

 

Ecology: Mummified cheetahs discovery

gives hope for species’ Arabic

reintroduction




Springer Nature




The discovery of seven naturally-mummified cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus) in caves in northern Saudi Arabia reveals that at least two subspecies of the endangered cats inhabited the Arabian Peninsula before their local extinction. The findings, reported in Communications Earth & Environment, may open new possibilities for the reintroduction of cheetahs to the peninsula.

Cheetahs once inhabited much of Africa as well as Western and Southern Asia, but now live in just 9% of their historic range. In Asia their range has decreased by 98%, and they are thought to have been locally extinct on the Arabian Peninsula since the 1970s. Although there are five cheetah subspecies, the Asiatic cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus venaticus) — thought to have been the only subspecies present in Saudi Arabia — is critically-endangered, with only a single small wild population remaining in Iran. Therefore, the feasibility of reintroducing cheetahs to the peninsula is debated.

Ahmed Boug and colleagues discovered seven naturally-mummified cheetahs, along with the skeletal remains of 54 additional cats, in five caves near the city of Arar in northern Saudi Arabia in 2022 and 2023. The authors dated samples from two of the mummified specimens and five sets of the skeletal remains. The oldest skeletal remains date from approximately 4,000 years ago, while the mummified remains date from approximately 130 and approximately 1,870 years ago. The authors also extracted complete genome sequences from three of the seven sampled specimens — the first time this has been done in naturally-mummified big cats. Although the most recent specimen is genetically closest to the Asiatic cheetah, the two older cheetahs — including the oldest dated specimen — are most similar to the Northwest African cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus hecki).

The authors say that their results show that subspecies other than the Asiatic cheetah could support the re-establishment of cheetahs in Saudi Arabia, as an increased available genetic pool makes rewilding efforts more feasible. They also suggest that their method shows that ancient DNA records from similar specimens could be used to inform future reintroduction plans for other species.

***

Springer Nature is committed to boosting the visibility of the UN Sustainable Development Goals and relevant information and evidence published in our journals and books. The research described in this press release pertains to SDG 15 (Life on Land). More information can be found here.

Friday, November 28, 2025

OUCH

Canada As A Critical Minerals Refiner Is Globally Irrelevant

  • UAE commits $70 billion to Canada in a landmark deal spanning energy, AI, logistics, mining, and other strategic sectors.

  • Canada eyes critical minerals independence, announcing a $1 billion project to expand domestic refining capacity.

  • Ottawa ramps up critical mineral projects through G7 partnerships and domestic incentives, but with only one rare earths mine and limited processing infrastructure, Canada remains far behind China.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has just returned from a trip to the United Arab Emirates (UAE), where he extracted a $70 billion investment pledge from the Gulf state.

The funding is expected to include energy, AI logistics, mining and other strategic industries.

Fed up with Donald Trump’s tariffs, Canada’s new government is on a mission to double non-US exports over the next decade and unleash $1 trillion in new investment in Canada over five years, according to a Nov. 21 press release.

In conjunction with the UAE announcement, Carney said Ottawa is working on a $1-billion project aimed at expanding critical minerals processing capacity in Canada.

“I'm pleased that an agreement valued over $1 billion is in the process of being finalized,” Carney said in a speech to the Canada-U.A.E. Business Council covered by CBC News.

“[It] will expand critical minerals processing capacity in Canada, creating jobs, boosting [the] long-term supply of minerals essential to energy technologies and advanced manufacturing. More on that soon," he said.

Rhetoric aside, where does Canada, a relatively small country in terms of mineral refining capacity, stand in terms of developing enough capacity to become independent of China, the leading refiner of critical minerals? Is Canada even globally relevant?

According to the International Energy Agency, China has an average market share of 70% for 19 out of 20 key minerals. For rare earth elements, it accounts for 91% of global refining production.

In 2024, China held a 96% share of global refined graphite, 78% of the world’s refined cobalt, 70% of its lithium, and 44% of its copper.

Despite a long mining history, Canada is really only a major miner of two commodities. It is the world’s largest producer and exporter of potash and the second-largest producer and exporter of uranium. While Canada is among the top 10 producers of cobalt, graphite, lithium and nickel — all now considered critical minerals — it accounts for only 5% of the global mine production of each of these minerals.

Related: Rocket Attack Forces Shutdown of Gas Field in Kurdistan

Staying with mine production for the minute, Australia accounts for 37% of total world lithium production. Indonesia is the top nickel miner at 59% of the world total, China mines 69% of the world’s rare earth elements and 79% of its graphite, and the DRC accounts for about three-quarters of world cobalt mine production. (Mineral Commodities Summary 2025, by the US Geological Survey)

China’s near-monopoly on critical minerals processing gives it serious heft in trade relations. In recent months, Beijing has leveraged its position to tighten export restrictions on minerals, including rare earths, graphite, antimony, gallium and germanium.

Canada has established domestic infrastructure for processing minerals such as aluminum and uranium, and has a few smelters and refineries for copper, nickel and zinc. But for the key energy-transition metals like lithium and rare earth elements, refining capacity is currently minimal or non-existent.

Canada’s first rare earths refinery was opened in 2024 in Saskatchewan. At full operation, the CAD$74 million facility is expected to produce 400 tonnes of NdPr metals per year, used to make permanent magnets.

By comparison, China in 2024 produced 83,697 tonnes of NdPr metal.

The United States is the primary export destination for 52% of all Canadian mineral exports and 63% of critical minerals. The latter are concentrated in the upstream stages of the value chain, meaning that further processing often occurs after export.

Canada certainly has ambitions to grow its critical minerals supply chain, from mining to refining to the manufacture of end products. The Canadian Mineral Minerals Strategy was published by the Canadian government in 2022, underscoring the need to secure and diversify supply chains.

Canada's critical minerals list contains 34 minerals deemed essential for economic or national security.

According to a recent piece by HillNotesSecuring critical minerals supply chains entails, among other measures, identifying the parties involved in extracting and processing critical minerals in this country… While foreign direct investment plays a crucial role in supporting this sector, concerns have been raised about foreign ownership of these resources.

Maps embedded into the article show that 30 of Canada’s 55 critical mineral mines are owned by companies whose parent company is based in Canada. For the other 25 mines, their parent companies are based in Brazil, the United States and Switzerland. The Tanco mine in Manitoba, which produces cesium, tantalum and lithium, is 100% owned by a Chinese company.

Canada is home to 45 advanced graphite, lithium and REE projects. Thirty-one are owned by a Canadian-domiciled company.

Only eight of the 32 critical mineral processing centers are owned by Canadian companies. The other 24 are owned by parent companies that reside in the United Kingdom, the United States, Switzerland, Brazil, France, Germany and Luxembourg.

At the end of October the Canadian government announced the first round of projects under a G7 critical minerals production alliance envisioned as a counterweight to China’s dominance in the sector.

According to Global News, the 25 initiatives include offtake agreements for a Quebec graphite mine and investments to scale up a rare earth elements refinery in Ontario.

Nouveau Monde Graphite’s Matawinie mine near Montreal secured agreement to buy part of the mine’s future production from the federal government, Panasonic and Traxys, a Luxembourg mining company.

Canada is also backing a Norwegian company’s plan to build a synthetic graphite plant in St. Thomas, Ontario, with up to $500 million in potential financing from Export Development Canada.

Graphite is used in the anodes of electric vehicle batteries. Vianode from Norway said in January it has signed a multi-billion-dollar supply deal with GM for its electric vehicles.

Global News said A Ucore Rare Metals facility in Kingston, Ont., was also conditionally approved for up to $36 million in federal money to help scale up its processing of two rare earth elements — samarium, used to make heat-resistant magnets in nuclear reactors, and gadolinium, a component of nuclear reactors and MRIs.

The refinery is expected to begin production in 2026.

Global demand for critical minerals is expected to increase significantly, with some estimates suggesting the energy sector's needs could grow sixfold by 2040. Will Canada be ready to meet the challenge by growing its domestic mining and refining capacity?

The numbers are daunting. Global News cites a report the Canadian Climate Institute that estimated Canada would need capital investments in the range of $30 billion by 2040 to meet domestic demand alone.

One area of potential growth is rare earth elements.

“Canada has some of the largest known reserves and resources of rare earths in the world,” the manager of government relations at the Saskatchewan Research Council said in 2022.

The USGS quantifies that with an estimated 830,000 tonnes of rare-earth oxide equivalent reserves in 2024. Compare this to China’s 44 million tonnes and Brazil’s 21 million tonnes.

Another CBC News article says it’s estimated that Canada has more than 14 million tonnes of rare earth oxides, with 21 mining projects in various stages of development, from exploration to resource estimation. The projects are in the Northwest Territories, Quebec, Ontario, Newfoundland and Labrador, Alberta and in Saskatchewan, according to Natural Resources Canada.

But Canada only has one producing rare earths mine, Nechalacho in the Northwest Territories. The country’s first REE mine is owned by Cheetah Resources, a subsidiary of Vital Metals, which processes the ore in Saskatchewan before being sent to Norway for separation.

China has thousands of mines, and while the number of rare earth mines is not publicly available, it hosts the largest REE mine in the world, the Bayan Obo mine in Inner Mongolia.

In 2024 China’s rare earths production reached 270,000 tonnes, which was more than two-thirds of the world's total, reports Investing News Network and Statista.

Canada’s REE production does not even register on the USGS’s 2024 mine production table.

Despite the government’s best intentions, Canada has a long way to go in both the mining and refining of critical minerals if it ever wants to become relevant — let alone break free of dependence on China.

By Andrew Topf for Oilprice.com 

Monday, November 17, 2025

 

Bridging the gap to bionic motion: challenges in legged robot limb unit design, modeling, and control





Beijing Institute of Technology Press Co., Ltd

Application scenarios of legged robots in diverse environments. 

image: 

Unlike traditional mobile robots, legged robots leverage their distinctive “leg” structures to traverse obstacles and adapt to uneven terrain, demonstrating exceptional mobility when confronted with pronounced undulations or soft ground. Their excellent terrain adaptability and high flexibility enable them to perform tasks in complex and unstructured environments that are challenging for wheeled or tracked robots to accomplish.

view more 

Credit: Jinyuan Liu, Zhejiang University.





In recent years, robots have increasingly become integral in enhancing human life, particularly with the growing demand for mobile robots with high payload-to-weight ratios and dynamic capabilities. Traditional wheeled or tracked robots are difficult to operate stably in complex real-world environments, which has driven research on legged robots. Legged robots leverage their distinctive “leg” structures to traverse obstacles and adapt to uneven terrain, demonstrating exceptional mobility when confronted with pronounced undulations or soft ground. However, research on legged robots faces a series of difficulties. From the hardware manufacture perspective, leg structures are required to not only support the robot’s weight, but also generate sufficient actuation force to drive the entire system. Furthermore, the impact force generated when the foot lifts off or contacts the ground can affect the internal structure, thereby making impact mitigation a critical consideration in the overall design process. From the control perspective, legged robots exhibit substantially greater kinematic and dynamic complexity compared to wheeled or tracked counterparts. This poses a significant challenge to the control architecture, requiring high-precision, real-time coordination between multiple joints and actuators.

Due to the reasons mentioned above, the construction and analysis of complete legged robotic systems remain inherently complex and challenging. “Compared to the complete multi-legged robots (MLRs), single-legged robots (SLRs) feature simpler configurations and typically admit a dynamic gait: hopping. Its hopping period can effectively characterize the behavior of multi legged and single legged structures, making it easier to tackle structural design and dynamic control problems.” said the author Jinyuan Liu, a researcher at Zhejiang University, “Therefore, we systematically review the mechanical structure, applications, modeling, and control strategies of SLRs, and outline key challenges and future directions, with the aim of narrowing the gap between engineering implementation and biomimetic motion.”

This article takes the single-leg robot (SLR) as a representative “lower-limb unit” for legged robots and develops a systematic review along four axes—structure, modeling, control, and challenges/prospects. On the hardware side, the article organizes SLRs by structure and actuation–elasticity configuration: (i) telescoping designs, centered on a linear prismatic degree of freedom, feature simple mechanisms and planning and suit planar/spatial jumping and baseline validation; and (ii) articulated designs, which biomimetically incorporate multiple joints and are further subdivided by actuation–elastic coupling into rigid (RALR), parallel elastic (PEALR), series elastic (SEALR), and variable stiffness (VSELR) variants. A performance–cost comparison is provided—for example, SEALR attenuates landing impacts and improves efficiency at the expense of structural complexity, whereas VSELR offers adaptability but increases control difficulty and mechanical heft—and a data-oriented survey of representative quadruped platforms (e.g., ANYmal, SpotMini, Cheetah) is used to bridge the path from single-leg to multi-leg systems. At the modeling level, the article delineates two principal lines for SLR research: the SLIP template models and the articulated reduced models. The former capture the core center-of-mass/ground-reaction dynamics via a spring-loaded inverted pendulum and extend to 1/2/3-DoF and other scenarios; the latter perform controlled structural simplifications that facilitate task-level controller design and comparative evaluation. On the control side, the article systematically compares model-based (e.g., VMC/IDC, MPC) and model-free (e.g., CPG, reinforcement learning) strategies: model-based methods offer interpretability and principled constraint handling but depend on accurate models, are sensitive to noise, and incur notable computational cost; model-free methods exhibit adaptability in high-DoF, nonlinear systems, yet face challenges in training cost, interpretability, and practical deployment—especially in transferring from simulation to hardware. Subsequently, the article summarizes the main Sim-to-Real bottlenecks—performance degradation due to sensor noise, actuation delays, and contact uncertainty—and the prevailing remedies, including domain randomization, high-fidelity simulators, and imitation learning, along with guidance for selecting among control strategies.

Finally, the article outlines a multi-pronged research agenda toward “bionic motion”: bio-inspired structures, lightweight fabrication (topology optimization, generative design, multi-material additive processes), auxiliary mechanisms (reaction wheels/tails, grasping, jump-fly hybrids), and new materials (high-energy-density elastomers, SMAs/soft actuators), emphasizing tight integration with intelligent control (including privileged-information RL and large-scale planning) to enhance stability, efficiency, and generality in real-world, complex environments.

However, SLRs still face practical gaps—model–reality mismatch under contact uncertainty, complexity–weight and reliability trade-offs in articulated/elastic actuation, energy and thermal limits during high-power transients, real-time compute burdens for whole-body coordination, and limited scalability from SLR templates to multi-leg systems in unstructured terrains. “Therefore, future research should pursue tightly coupled advances in morphology, materials, and control: bio-inspired structures; lightweight fabrication (topology optimization, generative design, multi-material additive processes); auxiliary mechanisms (reaction wheels/tails, grasping, jump-fly hybrids); and new materials (high-energy-density elastomers, SMAs/soft actuators)—all integrated with intelligent control, including privileged-information RL and large-scale planning, to enhance stability, efficiency, and generality in real-world, complex environments,” said Jinyuan Liu.

Authors of the paper include Junhui Zhang, Jinyuan Liu, Huaizhi Zong, Pengyuan Ji, Lizhou Fang, Yong Li, Huayong Yang, and Bing Xu.

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. U24B2049) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. U21A20124).

The paper, “Bridging the Gap to Bionic Motion: Challenges in Legged Robot Limb Unit Design, Modeling, and Control” was published in the journal Cyborg and Bionic Systems on Aug. 19, 2025, at DOI: 10.34133/cbsystems.0365.