Showing posts sorted by date for query DOG MEAT. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query DOG MEAT. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Monday, November 18, 2024

 

Can AI improve plant-based meats?



Stanford University
Plant-based meat and animal meat testing 

image: 

Is it possible to close the texture gap between plant-based meat and animal meat? Ellen Kuhl and her lab are trying. From left: Skyler St. Pierre, Marc Levenston, Ellen Kuhl, Reese Dunne, Ethan Darwin, Valerie Perez Medina, and Divya Adil pose with the meat and plant-based meat they analyzed. 

view more 

Credit: Credit: Kurt Hickman/Stanford University




Cutting back on animal protein in our diets can save on resources and greenhouse gas emissions. But convincing meat-loving consumers to switch up their menu is a challenge. Looking at this problem from a mechanical engineering angle, Stanford engineers are pioneering a new approach to food texture testing that could pave the way for faux filets that fool even committed carnivores.

In a new paper in Science of Food, the team demonstrated that a combination of mechanical testing and machine learning can describe food texture with striking similarity to human taste testers. Such a method could speed up the development of new and better plant-based meats. The team also found that some plant-based products are already nailing the texture of the meats they’re mimicking.

“We were surprised to find that today’s plant-based products can reproduce the whole texture spectrum of animal meats,” said Ellen Kuhl, professor of mechanical engineering and senior author of the study. Meat substitutes have come a long way from when tofu was the only option, she added.

Industrial animal agriculture contributes to climate change, pollution, habitat loss, and antibiotic resistance. That burden on the planet can be eased by swapping animal proteins for plant proteins in diets. One study estimated that plant-based meats, on average, have half the environmental impact as animal meat. But many meat eaters are reluctant to change; only about a third of Americans in one survey indicated they were “very likely” or “extremely likely” to buy plant-based alternatives.

“People love meat,” said Skyler St. Pierre, a PhD student in mechanical engineering and lead author of the paper. “If we want to convince the hardcore meat eaters that alternatives are worth trying, the closer we can mimic animal meat with plant-based products, the more likely people might be open to trying something new.”

To successfully mimic animal meat, food scientists analyze the texture of plant-based meat products. Unfortunately, traditional food testing methods are not standardized and the results are rarely made available to science and to the public, said St. Pierre. This makes it harder for scientists to collaborate and create new recipes for alternatives.

New food texture tests

The research grew out of a class project by St. Pierre. Looking for affordable materials to use in mechanical tests, he turned to hot dogs and tofu. Over the summer of 2023, undergraduate researchers joined in to test the foods and learn how engineers depict material responses to stress, loading, and stretching.

Realizing how this work could aid the development of plant-based meats, the Stanford team debuted a three-dimensional food test. They put eight products to the test: animal and plant-based hot dog, animal and plant-based sausage, animal and plant-based turkey, and extra firm and firm tofu. They mounted bits of meat into a machine that pulled, pushed, and sheared on the samples. “These three loading modes represent what you do when you chew,” said Kuhl, who is also the Catherine Holman Johnson Director of Stanford Bio-X and the Walter B. Reinhold Professor in the School of Engineering.

Then, they used machine learning to process the data from these tests: They designed a new type of neural network that takes the raw data from the tests and produces equations that explain the properties of the meats.

To see if these equations can explain the perception of texture, the team carried out a test survey. The testers – who first completed surveys on their openness to new foods and their attachment to meat – ate samples of the eight products and rated them on 5-point scale for 12 categories: soft, hard, brittle, chewy, gummy, viscous, springy, sticky, fibrous, fatty, moist, and meat-like.

Impressive hot dogs and sausages

In the mechanical testing, the plant-based hot dog and sausage behaved very similarly in the pulling, pushing, and shear tests to their animal counterparts, and showed similar stiffnesses. Meanwhile, the plant-based turkey was twice as stiff as animal turkey, and the tofu was much softer than the meat products. Strikingly, the human testers also ranked the stiffness of the hot dogs and sausages very similarly to the mechanical tests. “What’s really cool is that the ranking of the people was almost identical to the ranking of the machine,” said Kuhl. “That’s great because now we can use the machine to have a quantitative, very reproducible test.”

The findings suggest that new, data-driven methods hold promise for speeding up the process of developing tasty plant-based products. “Instead of using a trial-and-error approach to improve the texture of plant-based meat, we could envision using generative artificial intelligence to scientifically generate recipes for plant-based meat products with precisely desired properties,” the authors wrote in the paper.

But artificial intelligence recipe development, like other AIs, needs lots of data. That’s why the team is sharing their dataonline, making it open for other researchers to view and add to. “Historically, some researchers, and especially companies, don’t share their data and that’s a really big barrier to innovation,” said St. Pierre. Without sharing information and working together, he added, “how are we going to come up with a steak mimic together?”

The team is continuing to test foods and build a public database. This summer, St. Pierre oversaw undergraduates testing veggie and meat deli slices. The researchers also plan to test engineered fungi developed by Vayu Hill-Maini, who recently joined Stanford as an assistant professor of bioengineering. “If anybody has an artificial or a plant-based meat they want to test,” said Kuhl, “we’re so happy to test it to see how it stacks up.” 


For more information

Additional Stanford co-authors of the paper include Marc Levenston, associate professor of mechanical engineering; postdoctoral researcher Kevin Linka; graduate students Ethan C. Darwin, Divya Adil, and Valerie A. Perez Medina; visiting researcher MarĂ­a Parra Vallecillo; and undergraduate researchers Magaly C. Aviles, Archer Date, Reese A. Dunne, and Yanav Lall.

Kuhl is also a professor, by courtesy, of bioengineering in the schools of Engineering and Medicine, and a member of the Cardiovascular Institute, the Wu Tsai Human Performance Alliance, the Institute for Computational and Mathematical Engineering, and the Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute. Levenston is also a member of Bio-X, the Cardiovascular Institute, the Wu Tsai Human Performance Alliance and the Maternal & Child Health Research Institute.

This work was funded by the National Science Foundation, the Emmy Noether Programme, and the European Research Council.

Saturday, November 09, 2024

UK

Trump in the White House: The media landscape grows darker


Gabrielle Pickard-Whitehead Today
LEFT FOOT FORWARD


Trump's repeated attacks on 'fake news' and traditional media are one of the reasons why he's been labelled a fascist, given that one of the first things fascist governments do is close down independent media outlets.



“If Trump is gone before I wake, I pray to God the news ain’t fake,” read one viral meme on the night of the election. Sadly, the prayer went unanswered, but the notion of ‘fake news,’ which has become synonymous with Trump, feels more relevant than ever.

Since he announced his campaign for the US presidency first-time round in 2015, Donald Trump has repeatedly attacked ‘fake news’ and ‘traditional’ media. These attacks are one of the reasons why Trump has been labelled a fascist, given that one of the first things fascist governments do is close down independent media outlets.

Last Sunday, at a rally in Pennsylvania, he complained about the bulletproof glass surrounding him, stating: “To get me, somebody would have to shoot through the fake news – and I don’t mind that so much.”

He also called the media “bloodsuckers.”

“The media is so damn bad – it’s unbelievable,” he said, specifically criticising certain news outlets. “ABC, ABC, fake news, CBS, ABC, NBC,” he said. “These are, in my opinion, these are seriously corrupt people.”

As Trump intensifies his attacks on the mainstream media, the unregulated landscape of social media – where misinformation thrives – undoubtedly aided him in securing a second presidency, as it did the first-time round.

In 2015, Trump built a massive social media following, with supporters dubbing themselves “centipedes,” closely tracking his every move. During his presidency, the White House even considered some of his 8,000 tweets as official statements. Following his Twitter ban in January 2021, after he referred to the Capitol rioters as “patriots,” he had amassed over 88.9 million followers.

But when Elon Musk reinstated Trump’s account in 2022, Trump opted not to return, instead promoting his own platform, Truth Social, described by the LA Times as a “mix of swaggering gun talk, typo-filled Bible scripture, violent Biden bashing, nonsensical conspiracy theories and more misguided memes about Jan. 6 “hostages,” trans satanists and murderous migrants than anyone should be subjected to…”

A pro-Trump echo chamber

Even without Trump, under Musk, Twitter – now X – has witnessed a lurch to the right. X’s owner – the richest man in the world – has increasingly used the social media platform as a megaphone to amplify his political views. During the election campaign, he bombarded his millions of followers with pro-Trump content, some accurate, some misleading. Following Musk’s endorsement of the now president-elect, X algorithms intensified pro-Trump content.

“I don’t think this race would even be close if it wasn’t for what Elon Musk was doing with X and showing people what is going on,” said Trump’s eldest son, Donald Trump Junior.

This year, Trump’s digital outreach became the cornerstone of his campaign. Podcasters and influencers, with millions of followers tuning into their weekly, even daily shows, trumpeted Trump’s message with little scrutiny.

Makena Kelly of Wired’s Political Lab, notes how the industry has grown and changed dramatically since the last presidential contest, eclipsing the traditional media in viewership in some cases. “This size and power is a legitimising force, despite the racist and misogynistic rhetoric some share with the manosphere.”

Joe Rogan, whose chart-topping podcast has an estimated 81% male audience, announced he was giving the Republican his backing after being convinced in one of his interviews by Elon Musk. It was said that Rogan’s backing could carry significant weight with his young, male listenership – who Trump had been working hard to court ahead of the 2024 vote. Trump welcomed the endorsement as “great” news.

And this so-called ‘heterodoxy,’ ‘free-thinkers’ like Joe Rogan and Elon Musk, and their endorsement of the Republican’s hyper-masculine promise, seemed to win over their young male audience. Among younger voters aged 18-29, 49 percent of men voted for Donald Trump, shattering previous images of young people generally leaning left.

While online influencers and digital media is eclipsing traditional media in US, the trend appears to be progressing more slowly in the UK. Both Labour and the Conservatives have invested heavily in online strategies to reach voters. In the 2015 election, Labour enlisted Blue State Digital, known for its work on Barack Obama’s campaigns, while the Conservatives allocated substantial resources to Facebook advertising.

But as a study by Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism at Oxford University found, despite advancements in digital media, traditional broadcast media remained more influential in shaping public opinion during the 2015 election, with much social media discussion responding to broadcast content.

Nonetheless, the trend suggested that the influence of digital media was set to grow in future elections.

Now, eight years later, digital, unregulated platforms have become a formidable force in the political landscape, and, it seems, it’s the right-wingers who are on the winning foot.

The TikTok generation

Take TikTok, which, during his first presidency, Trump was the biggest threat to the platform after he tried to ban it on national security grounds. Trump joined the video sharing app in June, and just a day later, had attracted three million followers. As Reuters reported, the move was strategically aimed at connecting with younger voters in his third bid for the White House.

His inaugural TikTok video featured him greeting fans at an Ultimate Fighting Championship event in New Jersey and quickly racked up millions of views. In a statement, he asserted that he would “use every tool available to speak directly with the American people.”

Though it’s uncomfortable to find any merit in Trump’s statements, with about half of TikTok’s users under age 30 saying they rely on the platform to keep up with politics, his observations reflect the reality of today’s media landscape, where social media has emerged as a dominant force.

Traditional media is declining and increasingly appeals to an aging audience, yet even this demographic does not always align with its content.

A recent survey found that 78% of Americans aged 65 or older get most political and election news from journalists and news organisations. But that figure drops to 55 percent for people aged 30-49 and to 45 percent for 18-29-year-olds.

But in the UK, despite the pervasive Conservative messaging in the media, research shows that those who primarily read right-wing news outlets are increasingly inclined to support alternatives to the Conservatives.

Polling by Best for Britain in April suggested that despite the domination of Conservative-leaning newspapers in the industry, 37 percent of people who get their news mostly from print outlets had planned to vote Labour at the election compared to 22 percent who plan to vote for the Conservative Party.

Readers of the Sun were found to be the most likely of readership to back Labour with almost four in ten (38 percent) having planned to cast their vote for Starmer compared to one in four (25 percent) prepared to back Sunak. The only right-wing newspaper to buck the trend was the Daily Mail whose readers continue to lean Conservative 33 percent to 26 percent for Labour.

A separate poll showed a similar trend among GB News watchers, where Labour led by 39 percent to 28 percent, excluding undecided voters.

The ‘Trump effect’

There is little doubt that the “Trump effect” in America has spread widespread distrust and hostility towards mainstream media, creating a disconnect between millions of American voters and the principles of balance, respect, and quality journalism that once defined traditional media (at least quality traditional media).Of course, the big difference between our media and that of the US is the BBC, which, for all its faults, is widely loved and respected, in spite of being continually sniped at by Conservatives and the right-wing media.

Unlike the likes of Fox News and other US news outlets, the ‘Beeb’ doesn’t rely on polarisation as a business model, as it’s legally obligated to neutrality.

Foreign Policy notes that one might assume American viewers are just different. Perhaps they like drama, hyperbole, and confirmation more? But a 2020 report by the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, shows that isn’t necessarily true. Rather, 60 percent of Americans want neutral news. What’s more, 56 percent of Americans find the BBC trustworthy.

But, with or without a BBC, when it comes to winning elections, clearly, political strategists are increasingly recognising that traditional media is not as essential, as it once was. And it’s the right that seem to be winning the digital media wars.

For Mark Jacob, author of Stop the Presses, a weekly newsletter about how right-wing extremism has exploited the weaknesses in American journalism, the decline of traditional media is not solely its fault, as the rise of smartphones and social media has altered consumer habits. He argues that right-wing disinformation has bewildered mainstream journalists, who have often failed to adapt their strategies in the face of this challenge.

Instead of merely broadcasting political rhetoric, journalism should focus on meaningful investigations, contextualising news events, and holding public figures accountable.

“… with Trump’s successful campaign of lies eight years ago should have come an aggressive reassessment by the media. Only in limited cases has that happened. Networks are still letting a deranged criminal traitor tell outrageous falsehoods on live television with no pushback. They’re amplifying disinformation and pretending that amounts to “fairness.”

Abetted by our own right-wing press

In addition to the insufficient accountability in mainstream media coverage that Jacob highlights, and the right’s more visceral connection with audiences on social media, Trump was, regrettably, even supported by our own right-wing press.

During the final weeks of the campaign, content with negative sentiment about Kamala Harris was published on the Daily Mail’s TikTok account, which has 20 million followers. It achieved 13.4 million views, outperforming even Trump’s official campaign account.

The Daily Mail capitalised on controversial content, including a widely criticised performance by stand-up comedian Tony Hinchcliffe at a Trump rally, which drew a backlash for its offensive remarks about Puerto Ricans. Despite this, the Mail focused on sensationalised clips that resonated with a pro-Trump audience.

In another pro-Trump viral clip, the Mail’s TikTok showed a tourist who had flown from Japan to attend a Trump rally. “Trump supporter goes above and BEYOND #trump#kamala#japan#election#newyorkcity#nyc,” read the accompanying text.

And judging by some of the comments in the feed below the clip, the content succeeded in resonating with its audience.

“The whole world wants Trump as president that should say something,” was an especially painful comment.

And it wasn’t just the Daily Mail’s TikTok account spouting a pro-Trump narrative. In the final few days of the campaign, the newspaper’s columnist Richard Littlejohn – who has advocated hiring the host of You Are What You Eat, Dr Gillian McKeith, to sift through human excrement to identify country of origin – wrote an article headlined, “I haven’t got a dog in this fight, but watching Trump I can’t help wishing we had a politician who would give us hope again, make Britain great again – and make us laugh again.”

Which brings me onto Nigel Farage, a vocal Trump supporter, and shrewd social media promoter, whose videos on TikTok outperformed all other parties and candidates during the general election campaign.

During a rally in Pennsylvania on the eve of the vote, Farage met Trump backstage, posting the encounter to his millions of followers on social media.

The Reform UK leader claimed “a Trump win will make the world a safer place” despite concerns on both sides of the Atlantic over past threats by the Republican to pull the US away from Nato.

Reciprocating the endorsements, Trump gave a special mention to the Reform leader during the rally. In a shout-out to his “friend,” he said: “He’s shaking it up out there. He was the big winner of the last election in the UK.”

As the mainstream media seems sadly on a path to its own irrelevance, modern media is being ever more tightly embraced by populist, right-wing politicians.

Of course, many UK politicians are behind the curve and are still intimidated by nasty headlines in the Mail, with ministers finding themselves asking, “What would the Mail say?” when contemplating any ‘liberal’ policy that might provoke backlash from the paper.

In a media landscape transformed by social platforms and the relentless march of misinformation, the prayer that “the news ain’t fake” resonates louder than ever.

With each rally, each viral TikTok, and each strategic post, Trump’s influence underlines a crucial lesson for journalism. To survive, the mainstream must adapt, prioritising truth and accountability over the more comfortable narratives of the past. The call for a fearless and honest press is urgent, otherwise, the media risks becoming a relic, sidelined by a populist tide that thrives on chaos and distortion. Just as the meme prayed for truth, the future of journalism must embody it – before it’s too late.

Right-wing media watch – Once again, the anti-woke brigade fail to grasp the National Trust’s appeal

Undeterred by yet another failed invasion attempt, the right-wing anti-woke crusaders at Restore Trust faced their fourth defeat in trying to plant their candidates on the National Trust council during this year’s Annual General Meeting (AGM).

Their candidates managed a mere 18,000 votes while the winning candidates scooped a hefty 42,000.

But fear not, GB News remained determined to throw around ‘woke’ insults at Europe’s largest conservation charity.

“National Trust pushes through woke vegan overhaul of cafes despite backlash from members,” blared their headline on November 3.

Despite a resounding 57,490 votes in favour of a resolution to make half the offerings at its 300 cafes plant-based, the broadcaster insists the Trust is facing a backlash over the decision, with 20,111 votes opposing it.

“….critics accuse the [National Trust’s] leadership of pushing an anti-meat agenda,” the article continues, citing on such critic stating: “This motion forces us to eat food that is not of our choice. Instead, we should be supporting the National Trust’s livestock tenant farmers.”

In addition to the vegan produce resolution, members also backed a proposal to strengthen the trust’s response to the climate emergency and support the proposed Climate and Nature Bill.

But rather than commending such climate efforts, GB News was intent on stirring up trouble reporting that some AGM attendees expressed concern about staff and volunteers’ attitudes toward British history.

“Some questioned the attitudes and patriotism of staff and volunteers towards British history, following comments by director general Hilary McGrady about the progressive nature of trust employees,” the article continues.

The broadcaster was also quick to inform of other “recent controversies,” including the “trust’s use of explainer panels highlighting slave-owning histories at its properties, the introduction of vegan scones, and decisions regarding property restoration.

“Additionally, there was criticism of the trust’s ‘quick vote’ system, which some argue stifles debate.”

In fact, GB News even dedicated a whole separate article to this right-wing complaint, with a headline screaming: “National Trust members furious after being BLOCKED from holding vote aimed at stopping charity imposing woke policies without scrutiny.”

“A group of National Trust members has been prevented from attempting to debate the charity’s “debate-stifling” voting system at its annual meeting last weekend.

You’d think after four consecutive failures, the anti-woke media might take a hint and recognise that folk actually appreciate the National Trust’s woke, progressive, vegan, left-wing appeal – whatever label they want to slap on it.

Smear of the week – Ed Miliband and the kettle conspiracy!

Ed Miliband has long been a favourite target of the right-wing press. During the 2015 general election, the Tory tabloids launched a full-scale smear campaign, with the Sun devoting nearly half its front page to a photo of Miliband looking like he was about to have a heart attack while eating a bacon sandwich. “Don’t swallow his porkies and keep him OUT!” was the message.

The media’s vitriol towards Miliband and Labour was consistent and intense, and many believe that the combined efforts of the Sun, Daily Mail, Daily Express, and Daily Telegraph, not only contributed to, but actually orchestrated Miliband’s downfall.

“… I haven’t a shadow of doubt that Ed Miliband lost because of newspaper coverage,” said Roy Greenslade, a former professor of journalism at City University.

And, as the saying goes, a leopard never changes its spots, especially when it comes to right-wing media outlets.

Now, as the minister for energy security and Net Zero, Miliband is facing renewed attacks, not only because they view him as an easy target, but also because if there’s one thing the right-wing press seems to loathe, it’s the concept of Net Zero.

“Miliband’s war on teatime: People ‘will have to restrict when they boil the kettle to help Ed Miliband hit 2030 clean power targets,” headlined the Sun this week.



The article continues with dire warnings about the need for swift planning and regulatory reform to meet ambitious infrastructure goals.

The experts the piece refers to is the National Energy System Operator (NESO), which the Sun was quick to point out is now taxpayer-owned after a £630m deal. Their ‘Our Clean Power 2030 advice to government report, which was commissioned by Miliband and published this week, concludes that while the challenge of achieving clean power by 2030 is substantial, it’s feasible.

But as Stop Funding Heat – a group dedicated to calling out media outlets for spreading “climate lies” for clicks, sales and vested interests – astutely noted, the very report the Sun twisted for its headline doesn’t even mention the words “kettle” or “boil.” In fact, it highlights the benefits of transitioning to clean energy.

“Who’d have predicted that the Sun would run yet another misleading headline about climate policy?” the group mockingly asked.

Indeed, the report is decidedly pro-climate action. Fintan Slye, the chief executive of NESO, said: “There’s no doubt that the challenges ahead on the journey to delivering clean power are great. However, if the scale of those challenges is matched with the bold, sustained actions that are outlined in this report, the benefits delivered could be even greater.”

Slye painted a rosy picture of a clean power system for Great Britain, one that would free us from the volatility of international gas prices, secure our homes with affordable energy, decarbonise our commutes, and drive innovation.

But of course, the part of the report that the Sun jumped on was its assertion that meeting the 2030 targets would require a six-fold increase in “demand flexibility.”

In other words, we might have to forgo our cherished cuppa during Coronation Street breaks or at the half-time whistle during the football. And somehow, it’s all Ed Miliband’s fault.

Poor old Ed, he always manages to brew up a media storm! Mind you, it could be said that he must be doing something right to attract so much vitriol from the likes of the Sun.

Gabrielle Pickard-Whitehead is author of Right-Wing Watch

Tuesday, September 10, 2024

Animal Activists are “Poor in Spirit”


 
 September 10, 2024
Facebook

Photo by Suzanne Tucker

In the first beatitude, Jesus says, “Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the Kingdom of Heaven.” The analogous blessing from the Sermon on the Plain, in the Gospel of Luke, is more straightforward. Jesus says, “Blessed are the poor.” The text from the Sermon on the Mount in the Gospel of Matthew is a little ambiguous.

Commentators frequently interpret ‘poor in spirit’ to mean those who have a humble attitude toward God. It implies an openness to the divine will and presence. Only by working to empty ourselves of selfish desires do we leave room for God to fill the space. Similarly, this emptying allows us to recognize the divine presence in others.When we’re poor in spirit, we can sense God telling us it’s wrong to kill animals and cause them to suffer. When we’re poor in spirit, we can see the divine presence in all, including other creatures, no matter how different they look on the outside. Finally, when we’re poor in spirit, God gives us the energy to pursue animal liberation.

Syl Ko is a writer known for highlighting the ways in which race, species and gender are interconnected. Along with her sibling, she wrote the book Aphro-ism: Essays on Pop Culture, Feminism, and Black Veganism from Two Sisters. Ko studied philosophy at San Francisco State University and the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

Like many of the activists and scholars I highlight here, Ko didn’t employ spiritual language to describe her adoption of an animal-rights perspective, but it certainly could be described that way, with a sufficiently perennialist and panentheistic theology. Ko’s anti-speciesist insight was possible because of her openness to the divine will.

Ko was perhaps six or seven when she realized chicken bones were bones formerly inside animals’ bodies. “I remember the whole night I was just really hard on myself that I never made the connection,” Ko said in an interview with McGill Daily. “Then I started to hide the meat from our meals in my shoes, and I would go flush it down the toilet.“

Steven Best is co-founder of the Institute for Critical Animal Studies and the North American Animal Liberation Press Office. His work frequently provides justification for the Animal Liberation Front and seeks to link the nonhuman movement with the broader left. He is an associate professor of philosophy at the University of Texas at El Paso.

Best explicitly described his conversion to animal-rights consciousness in religious terms. “I experienced something sacred within the bowels of the profane,” he wrote on his blog. “I was in Chicago, driving about 2 am, half-drunk and goddamn hungry. I pulled into a White Castle fast food restaurant and ordered a double cheeseburger.”

Best was usually content with a single cheeseburger. There was something about the two cheese slices and two meat patties that seemed so excessive, gross, and steeped in violence that he felt nauseated. For the first time in his life, Best made the connection between the food in his hands and the body of a living animal.

“I spit the vile flesh out of my mouth in utter revulsion,” he said. “I stumbled around in a dietary no-man’s-land for two months, not knowing what to eat, not wanting this consciousness but unable to shake it.” Thankfully, Best met some vegetarians who reassured him and steered the future animal-rights scholar in the right direction.

Ingrid Newkirk is the cofounder of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. She is the most influential nonhuman activist of her generation. Besides running PETA, she is the author of a number of books, including Animalkind: Remarkable Discoveries About Animals and Revolutionary New Ways to Show Them Compassion.

As many in the nonhuman movement are, Newkirk is an atheist. However, when we enlarge our concept of the God to include all goodness, we can argue the value she saw in our fellow creatures was the divine presence. Newkirk began to accept the implications of this value and it led to a profound shift in her thinking.

“As an animal cruelty officer, I went to a farm in Maryland, and they had abandoned all the animals,” Newkirk told WWTW. “All the animals were dead except one pig. I gave him water and put him in the truck to go to the vet. And on the way home, I thought, I wonder what I will have to eat for dinner tonight.”

Newkirk realized she had frozen pork chops at home. Suddenly, she connected the dots, thinking about the pig who she was bringing to the veterinarian. The contradiction of prosecuting people for animal cruelty while she continued to eat meat was too much for Newkirk to bear. She became a vegetarian.

Faraz Harsini is a scientist at the Good Food Institute, where he researches cultivated meat. Additionally, he is the founder of Allied Scholars for Animal Protection, which seeks to bring nonhuman advocacy to different academic settings. Farsini has collaborated with groups like PETA, Humane Society of the United States and others.

Like a great number of those I discuss here, he became vegetarian first and then vegan. Farsini made the initial change after someone accused him of hypocrisy. Instead of staying defensive or cynical, Harsini recognized and responded to the call of God, or, to put it in secular terms, the call of conscience.

For Harsini, the initial change resulted from a disagreement, in which he opposed buying a fish as part of Persian New Year celebrations. “It’s a tradition to keep live goldfish in water tanks, symbolizing life and freedom,” he said in an interview with Farm Animal Rights Movement. “Ironically, many fish suffer and die during this process.”

Harsini’s friend told him it made no sense to be advocating for this fish while he was eating other fish. The comment initially upset Harsini, but it got the scientist thinking and eventually led him to an anti-speciesist perspective. For many, who aren’t so poor in spirit, this wouldn’t have been possible.

Leah GarcĂ©s is the president of Mercy for Animals. Previously, she oversaw campaigns in 14 countries at the World Society for the Protection of Animals and launched Compassion in World Farming in the United States. She’s written a couple books, including Grilled: Turning Adversaries into Allies to Change the Chicken Industry.

She became vegetarian, as people frequently do, when she became aware of the inconsistency in her feelings toward animals and her diet. When we love our fellow creatures, as Garcés does, we love God, who is present in all. This is one of my favorite aspects of a panentheism. Fighting nonhuman exploitation becomes a religious duty.

“I grew up in the swamps of Florida, watching wild ducks raise their young in my mom’s flower beds,” GarcĂ©s recounted to Planetary Press. “I grew up with the conviction that these ducks, and all animals, have rich inner lives and could experience joy, love, and families, just like us.”

GarcĂ©s was deeply upset when she saw a documentary about factory farming as a teenager. Despite her affection for animals, GarcĂ©s realized she was complicit in their abuse. Rather than suppressing these negative feelings, GarcĂ©s chose to dedicate her life to protecting God’s creatures.

Ronnie Lee is the founder of the Animal Liberation Front, who, in recent years, has changed his focus to vegan education and electoral work. The Green Party of England and Wales has been Lee’s vehicle in politics. He hosts an online news show, called Slash the Banner, with his wife, Louise Ryan.

Having spent many hours interviewing Lee, I know he’d never describe his transition to vegetarianism as spirituality inspired. However, it can be interpreted that way with a broad definition of God. The divine isn’t an old man in the sky. That’s a metaphor which can serve a practical purpose, but is also limiting.

Lee’s sister was dating a vegetarian, who opposed killing animals. This simple rationale was a profound challenge to Lee. As he said in one of our conversations: “I spent about three nights staying awake thinking about this, and it playing on my mind, and me trying to find some excuse to carry on eating meat.” Ultimately, he listened to God.

Corey Lee Wrenn is the author of a number of books about animal rights. These include Animals in Irish Society: Interspecies Oppression and Vegan Liberation in Britain’s First Colony. She is also the founder of Vegan Feminist Network and a co-founder of the International Association of Vegan Sociologists.

As a teenager, Wrenn was poor in spirit, so when she was confronted with the violence of our food system, she became a vegetarian. “I was watching a cooking program with my mom,” Wrenn said on the Sentientism podcast. “The guy went to a butcher shop in the program. There were pigs heads hanging from chains. That was the moment.”

The imagery made a connection for her in a visceral way. The meat she ate came from a once living animal. Surely Wrenn knew this before, but the cooking program made it more difficult to avoid. Wrenn announced she wouldn’t consume flesh again. Her mother was skeptical, but Wrenn stuck to the pledge.

Paul Shapiro is the the author of Clean Meat: How Growing Meat Without Animals Will Revolutionize Dinner and the World. He is CEO of Better Meat Co. and host of the Business for Good podcast. Previously, he founded Compassion Over Killing, now Animal Outlook, and served as a vice president at HSUS.

At an early age, Shapiro recognized what we might term a divine spark in our fellow creatures. “I basically figured that we don’t have to eat animals,” Shapiro said on the Cultivated Meat and Future Food podcast. “And so if I had my choice between committing violence against them or not, I would really rather just live and let live.”

Priya Sawhney is a co-founder of Direct Action Everywhere. As part of her activism, she has disrupted events featuring Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos and Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders. Sawhney has been arrested a number of times and faced a variety of felony charges. She seems indomitable.

In an interview on the YouTube channel RenaissanceMarieAustin, Sawhney explained she had long been sympathetic to the suffering of animals. It upset her to see others treat God’s creatures with such callousness and disrespect. The reality of industrial agriculture came as a great shock.

“I grew up India where I saw a lot of stray dogs,” Sawhney said. “I really didn’t like it when I saw people bullying them, throwing rocks at them, you know, just treating them like they’re not living beings. To me, that was the worst thing that was happening. Then I started learning, ‘Oh wow, there’s factory farming.’”

Andrew Linzey is an Anglican priest and theologian. He is the author of many books making a Christian case for nonhuman rights. These include Animal Theology. Linzey is the founder and director of the Oxford Centre for Animal Ethics and the editor of the Journal for Animal Ethics.

While I have to translate the motivations of most of the activists and scholars I write about here into spiritual language, he is very clear about the religious motivations of his concern for nonhumans. From Linzey’s description, it sounded as if his Christian identity came first.

“When I was in my teens I had a series of intensely religious experiences,” he told Satya magazine. “They deepened my sense of God as the creator of all things. And they also deepened my sensitivity towards creation itself so that concern for God’s creatures and animal rights followed from that.”

Carol J. Adams has written a long list of titles, most famously The Sexual Politics of Meat: A Feminist-Vegetarian Critical Theory. It has been translated into German, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Turkish, Portuguese, Polish, Spanish, and French. In the 1970s, she helped launched a hotline for battered women in upstate New York.

Adams traced her vegetarianism to the killing of a horse, one she adored, after her first year at Yale Divinity School. Because Adams was poor in spirit, she was able to sense God telling us it’s wrong to eat animals. Most people dismiss these troubling intuitions. It’s to Adams’ credit she didn’t.

“I returned home,” she recounted to Nervy Girl. “As I was unpacking I heard a furious knocking at the door. Our neighbor greeted me as I opened the door. He exclaimed, ‘Someone has just shot your pony!’ I ran, with my neighbor, up to the back pasture behind our barn, and found the dead body of the pony I had loved.”

That evening, Adams was eating a hamburger, when she stopped mid-bite. The incongruity was too much. She was mourning one animal, while eating another. Adams couldn’t summon a defense of her ethical favoritism and so she became a vegetarian. Like Saint Paul in Damascus, the scales were falling from her eyes.

Christopher ‘Soul’ Eubanks is the founder of APEX Advocacy, which seeks to increase the numbers of people of color who participate in animal activism. He has volunteered with a variety of groups, including the Humane League, Anonymous the Voiceless, PETA, the Animal Save Movement, Mercy for Animals and others.

Eubank’s embrace of an anti-speciesist consciousness seemed to be the result of following the divine will wherever it led him, reflecting a humble attitude toward God. We should all aspire to this. Of course, that doesn’t mean we abandon reason and judgement, which help guide our inchoate sentiment.

“When I saw animals suffering, I thought about all the injustices that I saw happening to Black and brown people,” Eubanks told the Humane League. “I didn’t feel it was morally consistent for me to advocate against one form of oppression while contributing to another form of oppression.”

Sue Coe is a political artist and illustrator whose work frequently includes animal-liberation themes. Her pieces have been collected in a series of books, such as Cruel: Bearing Witness to Animal Exploitation. She received the Lifetime Achievement in Printmaking Award from the Southern Graphics Council International.

Growing up in England in the aftermath of World War II, near bombed-out ruins and a slaughterhouse, Coe came to see the divine — whatever she might have called the concept — in all, including our fellow creatures. That insight has informed her work throughout what is now a long, accomplished career.

“Art always has to go beyond human health, human drama, and human issues,” Coe said in an interview with Artforum. “As a child, I was forced to see the correlation between war, violence, and fascism, and animal cruelty and abuse. Once I figured that connection out, so early on, I realized that the Other is always at risk.”

Wayne Hsiung is the co-founder of Direct Action Everywhere. Since then, he’s launched a nonprofit called The Simple Heart Initiative, which seeks to expand the movement for open rescue. Hsiung also maintains a popular animal-rights blog and podcast, which share The Simple Heart name.

The activist told the YouTube channel VeganLinked he became vegan after his childhood dog died. This was prompted by feelings of guilt about the ways he and his family had not heeded the call of conscience or what might be called the will of God in their treatment of the animal.

“She lived in the laundry room for the first couple years of her life,” Hsiung said. “We didn’t have any experience raising animals, so my parents thought it was appropriate to hit a dog. That’s the way we disciplined her. It was not cool. We stopped eventually when we figured out this is a member of our family. This is not some sort of toy.”

More than that, though, Hsiung felt guilty about not visiting the dog when she was sick. He was studying for graduate school and ultimately didn’t see the animal before she passed. Hsiung resolved to do something important in her honor, and for him that was finally going vegan, after being vegetarian for some time.

Karen Davis was the founder of United Poultry Concerns, a group which seeks to address the treatment of domestic fowl. As part of her work, she ran a chicken sanctuary in Virginia. Davis was also the author of several books, including The Holocaust and the Henmaid’s Tail: A Case for Comparing Atrocities.

“I grew up in a meat-eating household in Pennsylvania,” she told the Eugene Veg Education Network. “Although I have always loved animals and hated animal cruelty, I ate animal products so unthinkingly that, while arguing at the dinner table with my father about hunting, it would be over a plate of dead animals.”

Ultimately, her inspiration for giving up meat came from a religious source. Davis read a famous essay by Leo Tolstoy called The First Step, in which the Christian pacifist recounted his visits to Moscow slaughterhouses and argued for vegetarianism. The article was originally a preface to someone else’s book.

Josh Harper was a member of Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty, a global pressure campaign which sought to close a notorious vivisection firm. Like some of those I mention here, he served time in prison for his activism. Among other things, Harper is now a volunteer archivist of movement history.

In various outlets, he’s mentioned the influence of hardcore music in his adoption of veganism. For many campaigners of his generation, this politicized scene was deeply formative. Fundamentally, however, his decision came down to a desire not to harm other creatures, who we could say bear the imprint of God.

“I went vegan because I can’t stand the idea that someone would needlessly suffer and be confined so that I can eat or dress myself,” Harper told Vegan Skate Blog. “Its very simply the right thing to do.” I believe most people know, deep down, it’s the right thing to do, but they’re not poor enough in spirit to follow the intuition.

lauren Ornelas is founder of the Food Empowerment Project, a food justice non-profit that promotes veganism. As a teenager, she started the first high school nonhuman liberation group in Texas. In a similar, trailblazing fashion, Ornelas was the first woman of color inducted into the Animal Rights Hall of Fame.

Ornelas’ dietary journey wasn’t linear. However, in recognizing the moral worth of other creatures, she recognized their shared divine origin. “I went vegetarian as I didn’t want to contribute to the suffering of non-human animals or be responsible for separating them,” Ornelas explained to Authority Magazine.

Alex Hershaft is a Holocaust survivor and the co-founder of Farm Animal Rights Movement. He organized national non-human liberation conferences, World Day for Farmed Animals and other initiatives. Hershaft served on the boards of a number of organizations, including Jewish Veg and the American Humanist Association.

Perhaps he would use different language to describe the experience, but I believe, from a religious perspective, Hershaft came to see God was present in other beings, like God was present in humans. This realization, which came after a visit to a slaughterhouse in the 1970s, completely reordered his life.

“I suddenly came across piles of hearts, lungs, heads, hooves, and discarded body parts,” he said in a FARM interview. “Very quickly, I made the association with the piles of body parts I saw in Auschwitz, the use of cattle cars to transport people to the gas chambers, [and] the crowding in wood containers of the victims.”

Angela Davis is primarily recognized as a socialist, feminist and anti-racist, but she’s also made clear her leftist sympathies cross the species barrier. Davis, of course, is a world-famous intellectual, best known for her autobiography or maybe the later title Women, Race and Class. She was a longtime member of Communist Party USA.

“Most people don’t think about the fact that they’re eating animals,” Davis said in an interview with Grace Lee Boggs, explaining her veganism. “When they’re eating a steak or eating chicken, most people don’t think about the tremendous suffering that those animals endure simply to become food products to be consumed by human beings.”

The vocabulary of Marxism is very dissimilar to the vocabulary of religion. Still, using an expansive understanding of the divine, I think we can say, in following her ideals through the unfamiliar territory of anti-speciesism, Davis is following the path God has laid before her. She’s remarkably poor in spirit.

Tom Regan was a philosopher specializing in nonhuman ethics. His most influential book was The Case for Animal Rights, which was inspired by Immanuel Kant. Regan was also a cofounder of the Culture and Animals Foundation, a nonprofit that continues to support artistic and intellectual work which benefits other creatures.

He had accepted the merits of vegetarianism on an abstract level, but it wasn’t until the death of a beloved dog, Gleco, that Regan and his wife changed their personal habits. The couple seemed to generalize the inherent value or divine spark they recognized in their companion to creatures humanity typically exploits.

“I often say that reason can lead the will to water but only emotion can make it drink,” he explained in a statement quoted by the Vegetarian Resource Group. “We saw the animals we ate in the same way that we saw Gleco. Well, when the mind and heart are on the same page, that sealed the deal for us.”

Jane Velez-Mitchell is a former network television anchor who left the mainstream media and founded UnchainedTV, a non-profit which produces videos dedicated to animal liberatation and veganism. Among other honors, she has received a Compassionate Leadership Award from Mercy for Animals.

Velez-Mitchell was a vegetarian when she interviewed Howard Lyman, a fourth generation cattle rancher turned animal advocate, who compared milk to liquid meat. Velez-Mitchell was newly sober and wanted to put her deepest principles — or, to use the spiritual language, the will of God — into practice. So she became vegan.

“I wrote a book about what I call my three miracles: getting sober, coming out as gay, and going vegan,” Velez-Mitchell told VegNews. “When you get sober, you get clarity. I realized I couldn’t lie to myself about my sexual orientation. And then I started realizing that my behavior wasn’t in alignment with my values. I began thinking about factory farming.”

Marc Bekoff is a biologist, ethologist and behavioral ecologist. He is the author of a long list of titles, including The Emotional Lives of Animals: A Leading Scientist Explores Animal Joy, Sorrow and Empathy — and Why They Matter. Bekoff is a cofounder of Ethologists for the Ethical Treatment of Animals.

“My vegan journey probably started when I was about two or three years old,” he said to Vegan FTA, recounting stories his mother told him. “She said that I could feel the joy, pain, anxiety, or stress of an animal when I was very young.” Empathy is a spiritual endeavor, as it involves one being recognizing the shared divinity in another.

Nicoal Sheen is a former spokeswoman for the North American Animal Liberation Front Press Office. She is now a certified yoga instructor and the author of a number of texts, including a zine of vegan recipes, called Do No Harm, Eat No Crap. Sheen became vegetarian in high school after watching the PETA short Meet Your Meat.

“I had always considered myself an ‘animal lover,’ yet I was oblivious to how I actively contributed to the pain and suffering of other animals,” she said in an interview with Meatless Movement. The future spokeswoman was able to process this new information in a productive way because she was poor in spirit.

Christopher Sebastian is a journalist and lecturer on nonhuman rights. He writes about food, politics, media, pop culture, and animals. Sebastian teaches in the School of Journalism, Media, and Visual Arts at Anglo-American University in Prague. He became vegan after reading the book Skinny Bitch.

Sebastian was riveted as the bestseller pivoted away from a discussion of diet into a conversation about the exploitation of God’s creatures. “That was so much more emotionally arresting, and, of course, unexpected for me, that it was just an immediate shift as soon as I put the book down,” he said to Vegan FTA.

Jo-Anne McCarthur is a photojournalist and animal-liberation activist. She was the subject of a documentary, called The Ghosts in Our Machine. Her photographs documenting the treatment of nonhumans have been collected in a number of books, including We Animals. McCarthur runs a media agency that shares the same name.

She became vegan while interning at Farm Sanctuary. “I found myself in a pasture brushing my new friend Arbuckle,” McCarthur wrote in a Medium post, reminiscing about an elderly steer. “The only non-vegan thing I had with me at the sanctuary was a pair of boots. Leather boots. And I was wearing them that day.”

The photographer realized she didn’t want to wear clothes made of creatures like Arbuckle. McCarthur decided to abstain from animal products going forward. She recounted feeling at peace, intellectually, psychologically, emotionally and ethically. One might add spiritually, which is roughly synonymous with those terms.

Bruce Friedrich is co-founder of the Good Food Institute, which is leading the effort to accelerate the development of cultivated meat. Previously, he worked for PETA and Farm Sanctuary. Outside of the animal movement, Friedrich spent a few months in prison for damaging a fighter jet as part of an anti-war action.

He was another whose anti-speciesism was inspired by a religious source. Friedrich was first vegan for human-rights and environmental reasons, then he read one of Linzey’s books, specifically Christianity and the Rights of Animals. Friedrich was running a Catholic Worker hospitality house at the time.

“It changed my life,” he wrote in National Catholic Reporter, recalling the title’s impact. “As a result of my prayer over Linzey’s work and conversations with my spiritual director at St. Aloysius Catholic church, my focus turned to animal protection…  By any measure, what happens to farmed animals today is anti-Christian.”

Nirva Patel is the executive director of the Brooks McCormick Jr. Animal Law & Policy Program at Harvard Law School. She was a producer of the documentary Game Changers, about vegan athletes, and serves on the board of Farm Sanctuary. Patel was also influenced by her faith. In her case, that’s Jainism.
“Growing up in a Jain community, I always had that sense for suffering and for animals,” she told Young Jains of America. “I did consume dairy, ghee, milk, and cheese… It’s a common oversight to recognize the violence limited to the meat industry, but there is an egregious amount of cruelty just in the dairy industry.”
Peter Singer is the most influential anti-speciesist philosopher alive. He’s the author of a number books on a range of subjects, but the most important, for our purposes, is Animal Liberation. It’s a title that is often credited with rejuvenating the nonhuman-rights movement and inspiring multiple generations of activists.
Singer began to take vegetarianism seriously after a discussion with Richard Keshen, a fellow graduate student at Oxford, who abstained from meat for moral reasons. “Within a week or two, I said to my wife, who was here with me, ‘I think we have to change our diet,’” Singer recounted in an interview with Sung Hee Kim.
Of course, many people are convinced of the merits of vegetarianism, but that doesn’t lead them to actually change their habits. Singer did, because he was poor in spirit. The rest, as they say, is history. Despite the limitations of his utilitarian view, the philosopher helped millions consider animals in a more favorable light.
Genesis Butler is an animal-rights activist and one of the youngest people to ever give a TEDx talk. She has worked with Farm Sanctuary, HSUS, Mercy for Animals and other organizations to spread her compassionate message. She’s currently an ambassador for Earth Day’s Foodprints for the Future.
Butler became vegan at an early age. “I started to ask a lot of questions, like where my food was coming from, and my mom finally told me how we had to eat animals and kill them for my food,” she said on the All About Change podcast. “That really devastated me, and I was like, ‘I don’t want to eat this again,’ so then I went vegan.”
Young kids, who aren’t burdened by decades of speciesist socialization, often have an easier time seeing the divine presence in animals. I imagine this wasn’t exactly what Jesus had in mind when he said we must become like little children to enter the kingdom of heaven. Still, I don’t think it could be too far off.
Kim Stallwood has held a variety of positions in the professional animal movement. For instance, he’s a former national director of PETA and executive editor of Animals’ Agenda. Stallwood wrote a memoir, called Growl: Life Lessons, Hard Truths, and Bold Strategies from an Animal Advocate.
He gave up meat after getting in an argument with a vegetarian friend about his summer job at a slaughterhouse. “Eventually, I realised that what I had been responsible for was wrong,” Stallwood recalled to Vegan FTA. Inspired by a friend, he listened to his quiet, innermost voice — what we might call the voice of God.
Melanie Joy is a social psychologist and author. She’s written a number of books, including Why We Love Dogs, Eat Pigs, and Wear Cows: An Introduction to Carnism. Joy is also the founder of the nonprofit group Beyond Carnism. She is a recipient of the Ahimsa Award, the Peter Singer Prize and the Empty Cages Prize.
Joy initially became vegetarian for health-related reasons. She ate a burger contaminated with campylobacter that made her so sick she couldn’t imagine consuming flesh again. Then she started learning about the suffering of our fellow creatures on farms and the other costs of animal agriculture.
“But what shocked me in some ways even more than what I was learning was that nobody I talked to was willing to hear what I had to say,” Joy told Vox. “I mean, the response was almost always something like, ‘Don’t tell me that, you’ll ruin my meal.’” This reaction fascinated her and became a focus of her research.
There’s a psychological explanation for it, but, as I’ve tried to show here, I believe there is a spiritual answer as well. Those who avoid such distressing information are not yet poor enough in spirit, the quality Jesus praised in the first Beatitude. We should all cultivate an openness to God’s will and the divine spark in animals.
Works cited

Andreann Asibey, G. M. (2018, January 16). A seat at the table with Syl Ko: A discussion on black veganism. The McGill Daily. https://www.mcgilldaily.com/2018/01/a-seat-at-the-table-with-syl-ko-a-discussion-on-black-veganism/

Notes from a diary of struggle: From epiphanies to aftermath. Dr. Steve Best. (2013, June 20). https://drstevebest.wordpress.com/2013/06/19/notes-from-a-diary-of-struggle-from-epiphanies-to-aftermath/

PETA founder protests pork industry practices, reflects on history of activism. WTTW News. (n.d.). https://news.wttw.com/2024/06/11/peta-founder-protests-pork-industry-practices-reflects-history-activism

Crescente, L. de. (2024, July 6). Dr. Faraz Harsini. FARM. https://farmusa.org/drfarazharsini

The Planetary Press. (2023, June 1). Transfarmation: Leah GarcĂ©s takes on Factory Farms, empowers farmers to shift to plant-based agriculture. The Planetary Press. https://www.theplanetarypress.com/2023/03/transfarmation-leah-garces-takes-on-factory-farms-empowers-farmers-to-shift-to-plant-based-agriculture/

Hochschartner, J. (2017). The Animals’ Freedom Fighter: A biography of Ronnie Lee, founder of the Animal Liberation Front. McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers.

Woodhouse, J. (2021, February 13). “Vegan stuff is going to be hot!” – sociologist Corey Lee Wrenn – new sentientist conversation. Sentientism. https://sentientism.info/vegan-stuff-is-going-to-be-hot-sociologist-corey-lee-wrenn-new-sentientist-conversation

Symposium, C. M. (2020, August 29). Cultured meat and future food podcast episode 3 with Paul Shapiro. Medium. https://cmsymp.medium.com/cultured-meat-and-future-food-podcast-episode-3-with-paul-shapiro-496948fe04c2

Interview with Priya Sawhney | Animal Activist and Loving Dog Walker Facing Felony Charges. (2023). YouTube. Retrieved 2024, from https://youtu.be/HEvPUrKYyds?si=YAM9ppam-crRFba7.

Satya Feb 96: Interview with Andrew Linzey. (n.d.). http://www.satyamag.com/feb96/linzey.html

Very vegetarian. Carol J. Adams. (n.d.). https://caroljadams.com/new-page-1

Thehumaneleague.org. (n.d.). https://thehumaneleague.org/article/video-changemaker-spotlight-soul-eubanks-of-apex-advocacy

O’Neill-Butler, L. (2023, September 26). Sue Coe. Artforum. https://www.artforum.com/columns/sue-coe-talks-about-her-ongoing-animal-rights-activism-and-political-art-240099/#:~:text=I%20initially%20made%20that%20connection,and%20animal%20cruelty%20and%20abuse.

Wayne Hsiung of DxE: A True HERO & Vegan Since 2001 Story, Insights & Perspective. (2022). YouTube . Retrieved September 6, 2024, from https://youtu.be/jptGey1JVsY?si=OXyHuVLtp57MfDVn.

EVEN Interview with Karen Davis, PhD. Eugene Veg Education Network. (n.d.). https://www.eugeneveg.org/pdf/Interviews/Interview-Karen_Davis.pdf

Vegetable shredder – Josh Harper. Vegan Skate Blog. (2012, September 29). https://veganskateblog.com/vegshred/vegetable-shredder-josh-harper

Sanders, M. (2024, June 1). How Lauren Ornelas of Food Empowerment Project is helping to promote sustainability and climate… Medium. https://medium.com/authority-magazine/how-lauren-ornelas-of-food-empowerment-project-is-helping-to-promote-sustainability-and-climate-6308b4c989e1

Dr. Alex Hershaft – A Journey from the Holocaust to Animal Rights. (2018). YouTube . Retrieved September 7, 2024, from https://youtu.be/0UQYw11OBkU?si=5mVjiUUdWB3dVfMF.

Loria, J. (2020, April 6). Angela Davis: Feminist, civil rights activist, and vegan. Mercy For Animals. https://mercyforanimals.org/blog/angela-davis-feminist-civil-rights-activist/

For Gleco: Tom Regan’s fight for Animal Rights. Vrg.org. (n.d.). https://www.vrg.org/journal/vj2014issue3/2014_issue3_vegetarian_action.php

Smith, K. (2024, August 5). How Jane Velez-Mitchell built a vegan media empire. VegNews.comhttps://vegnews.com/vegan-jane-velez-mitchell

Jordi Casamitjana. (2024, April 16). Marc Bekoff, the compassionate vegan ethologist and conservationist. Vegan FTA. https://veganfta.com/2024/04/15/marc-bekoff-the-compassionate-vegan-ethologist-and-conservationist/

Admin. (2023, August 5). This sustainable solution I offer will transform your life and bring about happiness, fulfillment, and nourishment in every aspect of your life. Meatless Movement. https://meatlessmovement.org/this-sustainable-solution-i-offer-will-transform-your-life-and-bring-about-happiness-fulfillment-and-nourishment-in-every-aspect-of-your-life/

Jordi Casamitjana. (2022, August 16). Christopher Sebastian, an eloquent vegan voice blossoming from an identity well. Vegan FTA. https://veganfta.com/2022/05/11/christopher-sebastian-an-eloquent-vegan-voice-blossoming-from-an-identity-well/

Media, W. A. (2023, April 1). 20 years vegan: Jo-Anne McArthur reflects on what it means to her. Medium. https://medium.com/@weanimalsmedia/20-years-vegan-jo-anne-mcarthur-reflects-on-what-it-means-to-her-47fa9743268b

Y. J. of A. (2022, July 29). The real game changer for animal rights. Medium. https://youngminds.yja.org/the-real-game-changer-for-animal-rights-d627201938bc

The Ethics of Food: The Making of a Vegetarian and Professor of Bioethics. (2013). YouTube . Retrieved September 7, 2024, from https://youtu.be/O3kyfLjyBzo?si=BMwNmytV56svTbl2.

Foundation, R. (n.d.). Genesis Butler- amplifying youth activism. Ruderman Family Foundation. https://rudermanfoundation.org/podcasts/genesis-butler-amplifying-youth-activism/

Kim Stallwood, a professional animal rights activist for over 40 Years. Vegan FTA. (2022, August 17). https://veganfta.com/2022/02/08/kim-stallwood-a-professional-animal-rights-activist-for-over-40-years/

Samuel, S., & Pinkerton, B. (2020, November 10). 3 core myths about eating animals – and why food tech may vanquish them. Vox. https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2020/11/10/21363336/vegan-meat-alternatives-technology-melanie-joy

Jon Hochschartner is the author of a number of books about animal-rights history, including The Animals’ Freedom FighterIngrid Newkirk, and Puppy Killer, Leave Town. He blogs at SlaughterFreeAmerica.Substack.com.