Showing posts sorted by date for query J. B. S. Haldane. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query J. B. S. Haldane. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Saturday, July 18, 2026

 

Iberian rabbit: species hidden by Spain and Portugal for 2 million years

New Iberian rabbit species discovered, July 2026
Copyright Daniel Burón - wildnatfilm.com

By Jesús Maturana
Published on

A CSIC team and universities in Spain, Portugal and the UK say the European rabbit is in fact two species split 2 million years ago, one now in decline.

For more than a century, scientists took it for granted that only a single species of rabbit lived on the Iberian Peninsula, at most divided into two regional variants. A study published in 'Biological Conservation' now calls that into question.

According to its authors, from the Institute for Advanced Social Studies (IESA-CSIC) and research centres in Portugal and the United Kingdom, it is in fact a case of two species with separate evolutionary histories: two lineages, a single label.

The study 'When taxonomy lags behind evolution: Consevation implications of cryptic diversity in the Iberian rabbit' (PDF (source in Spanish)), coordinated by Rafael Villafuerte and Miguel Delibes-Mateos together with researchers from the TRAMAS group, distinguishes between the Iberian rabbit ("Oryctolagus algirus") and the European rabbit ("Oryctolagus cuniculus").

The former occurs naturally in Portugal and western Spain, while the latter dominates the eastern part of the peninsula and is the source of the populations introduced in Europe, Oceania and the Americas, where it often behaves as an invasive species.

https://images.euronews.com/articles/stories/09/84/26/98/808x439_cmsv2_204c1c82-9c7b-5eea-94ef-83a2c7883421-9842698.jpg

https://images.euronews.com/articles/stories/09/84/26/98/{{w}}x{{h}}_cmsv2_204c1c82-9c7b-5eea-94ef-83a2c7883421-9842698.jpg

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320726003137?via%3Dihub#f0010 

The two animals diverged roughly two million years ago, when they became isolated in different refuges during glacial periods: one in the Ebro valley, the other in the Gulf of Cádiz. Since then, the researchers explain, they have barely interbred to any significant extent, despite looking very similar at first glance.

What sets them apart

The differences are not confined to the genome. The Iberian rabbit is smaller, with darker fur, smaller litters and earlier sexual maturity than the European species.

They also differ in their gut microbiome, the composition of their meat and the parasite communities they harbour. In Villafuerte's words, "the two species have always been there; what has changed is our knowledge of them".

https://images.euronews.com/articles/stories/09/84/26/98/808x1154_cmsv2_05aa4aa2-345d-5563-a380-b45a158da900-9842698.jpg

https://images.euronews.com/articles/stories/09/84/26/98/{{w}}x{{h}}_cmsv2_05aa4aa2-345d-5563-a380-b45a158da900-9842698.jpg

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320726003137?via%3Dihub#f0010 

The authors themselves point to precedents: something similar happened with giraffes, long grouped in a single species until genomics revealed that there were in fact four, or with African elephants, now divided into savannah and forest species.

Why does the discovery matter?

This is the aspect that most worries the researchers. While European rabbit populations remain stable or are even increasing across much of their range to the point of causing agricultural damage in some areas, the Iberian rabbit is in marked decline in Portugal and south-western Spain. Managing both as if they were the same species, they argue, has masked the severity of that fall.

The problem is not just statistical. Game restocking operations usually release European rabbits (source in Spanish), which are more abundant and prolific, into areas where only the Iberian rabbit previously lived. That can accelerate its replacement through competition and hybridisation, Delibes-Mateos warns: "We cannot go on managing as a single species two rabbits that have evolved separately for almost two million years".

The issue goes well beyond the animal itself. The rabbit is prey for up to 40 predator species, including the Iberian lynx and the Spanish imperial eagle, so its conservation status shapes that of much of Mediterranean wildlife.

Formally recognising the two species would, according to the authors, make it possible to design monitoring programmes, recovery plans and hunting regulations tailored to each lineage, instead of applying criteria devised for just one of them.

Friday, February 06, 2026

FREYA'S DAY SCIENCE DUMP


THE CREATOR, IF HE EXISTS, IS INORDINATELY FOND OF BEETLES
AND STARS

J.B.S HALDANE 


Friday, January 30, 2026


A Theological Truth: God Loves Beetles


(AND STARS)


Once the well-known English biologist,
J. B. S. Haldane, faced an eminent group
Of clergymen who asked him what he’d say,
From his career of studying the creatures
Of the universe, about the nature
Of the Supreme Being who created it.
The old man thought a bit and finally said,
“An inordinate fondness for beetles,”

The theologians may have been in shock
Or awe or disbelief, it isn’t said.
But what the scientist was telling them
Was true: of all the million animal
Species on the earth identified
And named, it seems some seventy-five per cent
Are insects, and out of those some sixty per cent
Are  beetles.

                      Whether or not the secret to God’s
Great Plan is truly beetles I am somewhat
Hesitant to say, but two undoubted
Truths arise from this profound remark.
The first is that diversity is key,
That marvelous diversity that’s found
In beetles, four-hundred thousand kinds—
Amazing is it not?—in fact more different
Kinds than any other species: spotted,
Striped, checkered, solid, yellow, purple,
Green, and rose, and some that live in sand
And garbage, some in trees and roses, some
So miniscule they’re almost invisible
To the naked eye, some a full-foot
Long; some are uni-sexed while some
Are multi-sexed, and some live in the tropics,
Some are in the Arctic, some indeed
Throughout the world.

                                        The second truth is that
Of size: small is beautiful. The great
Preponderance of the many million beetles
Is small, smaller than a human finger
All of them.  Which leads us to the fact
That there are many times more species that
Are small than there are large, by a ratio
Of ten to one at least.  So here we ask:
Does nature have a lesson for the human
Species in how it is that we should run
Our systems, customs, programs, nations—lives?

Kirkpatrick Sale is the author of 20 books, including Why the Sea is Salt: Poems of Love
and Loss (2001) and In the Beginning:  Essay-Poems and Others (2023).


If one could conclude as to the nature of the Creator from a study of creation, it would appear that God has an inordinate fondness for stars and beetles.

The Creator, if He exists, has a special preference for beetles, and so we might be more likely to meet them than any other type of animal on a planet that would support life.

 J. B. S. Haldane



Tuesday, August 19, 2025

 

Most known species evolved during 'explosions’ of diversity, shows first analysis across ‘tree of life’



Majority of living species concentrated among few disproportionately rich groups with high rates of diversification, shows first-of-its-kind study



Frontiers





The British evolutionary biologist JBS Haldane is said to have quipped that a divine being evidently had ‘an ordinate fondness for beetles’. This bon mot conveyed an important truth: the ‘tree of life’ – the family tree of all species, living or extinct – is very uneven. In places, it resembles a dense thicket of short twigs; elsewhere it has only sparse but long branches. A few groups tend to predominate: as Haldane pointed out, more than 40% of extant insects are beetles, while 60% of birds are passerines, and more than 85% of plants are flowering plants.

But is such a concentration of species within a few exceptionally large groups a universal phenomenon of life on Earth? This question, important for our understanding of evolution and ecology, has long been the subject of controversy among biologists. But until recently, it was difficult to answer due to our poor knowledge of the number of species in existence, their evolutionary relationships, and the age of each group. But now, scientists in the US finally have provided an answer, published in Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution.  

“Here we show for the first time that most living species do indeed belong to a limited number of rapid radiations: that is, they form groups with many species which evolved in a relatively short period of time,” said Dr John J. Wiens, a professor at the University of Arizona.

“Specifically, if we look among the kingdoms of life, among animal phyla, and among plant phyla, we find in each case that more than 80% of known species belong to the minority of groups with exceptionally high rates of species diversification.”

Wiens and his coauthor Dr Daniel Moen, an assistant professor at the University of California Riverside, here analyzed the distribution of species richness and diversification rates across ‘clades’ – groups of species that each evolved from a single ancestor, such as phyla, classes, or families.

Out on a limb

They did this for land plants, insects, vertebrates, for all animals, and for all species across life. They analyzed data on each clade’s species richness, age, and estimated diversification rate: that is, the accumulation of new species over time.

They focused on 10 phyla, 140 orders, and 678 families of land plants, jointly spanning more than 300,000 species; 31 orders and 870 families of insects, encompassing more than one million known species; 12 classes of vertebrates, encompassing more than 66,000 species; and 28 phyla and 1,710 families of animals with more than 1.5 million species. Finally, they analyzed 17 kingdoms and 2,545 families across all of life, including more than 2 million species.

The results were clear and consistent: irrespective of hierarchical level or group of organisms, the majority of extant species proved to be restricted to a few disproportionately large clades with higher-than-average diversification rates.

‘Rapid radiations’ of species are thought to occur when a new ecological niche opens up: for example, when a flock of grassquit birds dispersed from Central America to the virgin territory of the Galápagos Islands approximately 2.5 million years ago to diversify into the famous Darwin’s finches; or when an evolutionary innovation like powered flight prompted the radiation of bats 50 million years ago. 

Seeing the forest for the trees

“Our results imply that most of life's diversity is explained by such relatively rapid radiations. We also suggest key traits that might explain these rapid radiations, based on our results and results of earlier studies,” said Wiens.

“These traits include multicellularity in plants, animals, and fungi across the kingdoms of life; the invasion of land and the adoption of a plant-based diet in arthropods among animal phyla; and the emergence of flowers and insect pollination in flowering plants among plant phyla,” said Wiens.

However, one ‘known unknown’ remains: the distribution of species within the kingdom bacteria. Approximately 10,000 species of bacteria are known to science, but current estimates for the true number range from millions to trillions. However, the origin of bacteria dates back to 3.5 billion years ago, and so the overall diversification rate among them is actually quite low.

“If actual bacterial richness really is much higher than described richness for other groups, then a clade with low diversification rates [namely bacteria] would contain the majority of species across life – this would be in stark contrast to our results. Therefore, we caution that our results apply primarily to known species diversity,” wrote the authors.