Showing posts sorted by date for query L5. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query L5. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Friday, September 26, 2025

SPACE/COSMOS

Unlocking the secrets of the Sun’s poles


Beijing Zhongke Journal Publising Co. Ltd.

Schematic of the Solar Polar-orbit Observatory 

image: 

 Image courtesy of Zhenyong Hou and Jiasheng Wang at Peking University

view more 

Credit: Beijing Zhongke Journal Publising Co. Ltd.





The Sun’s poles are one of the last uncharted frontiers in solar physics. While space-based satellites and ground-based telescopes have provided extraordinary views of the solar surface, atmosphere, and magnetic field, our vantage point has usually been constrained to the ecliptic plane — the thin slice of space in which the Earth and most other planets orbit around the Sun. This perspective leaves the high-latitude polar regions of the Sun poorly observed and understood. Yet, the magnetic fields and dynamic processes in these regions play a crucial role in the solar magnetic cycle and in supplying mass and energy to the fast solar wind, ultimately being vital in controlling solar activities and driving space weather.

 

Why the Poles Matter

At first glance, the Sun’s poles may appear quiet compared to the active regions located approximately between latitudes of ±35°, where sunspots, solar flares, and coronal mass ejections (CMEs) dominate. However, the magnetic fields in the solar polar regions participate in the solar global dynamo process and may serve as a seed field for the subsequent solar cycle, characterizing the solar dipole magnetic field. Additionally, the in-situ measurements obtained by the Ulysses spacecraft reveal that  the fast solar wind largely originates from big coronal holes in the polar regions. Thus, understanding the Sun’s poles is essential for answering three of the most pressing questions in solar physics:

 

  1. How does the solar dynamo work and drive the solar magnetic cycle?

The solar magnetic cycle refers to the periodic variation in sunspot number on the solar surface, typically on a time scale of approximately 11 years. During each cycle, the Sun’s magnetic poles undergo a reversal, with the magnetic polarities of the north and south poles switching. The Sun’s global magnetic fields are generated through a dynamo process. Key to this process are the differential rotation of the Sun that generates the active regions, and the meridional circulation that transport magnetic flux toward the poles. Yet, decades of helioseismic investigations have revealed conflicting results about the flow patterns deep within the convection zone. Some studies even suggest poleward flows at the base of the convection zone, challenging the classical dynamo models. High-latitude observations of the magnetic fields and plasma motions could provide the missing evidence to refine or rethink these models.

 

  1. What drives the fast solar wind?

The fast solar wind - a supersonic stream of charged particles - originates primarily from the polar coronal holes, and permeates the majority of the heliospheric volume, dominating the physical environment of interplanetary space. However, critical details regarding the origin of this wind remain unresolved. Does the wind originate from dense plumes within coronal holes or from the less dense regions between them? Are wave-driven processes, magnetic reconnection, or some combination of both responsible for accelerating the plasma in the wind? Direct polar imaging and in-situ measurements are required to settle the debate.

 

  1. How do space weather events propagate through the solar system?

Heliospheric space weather refers to the disturbances in the heliospheric environment caused by the solar wind and solar eruptive activities. Extreme space weather events, such as large solar flares and CMEs, can significantly trigger space environmental disturbances such as severe geomagnetic and ionospheric storms, as well as spectacular aurora phenomena, posing a serious threat to the safety of high-tech activities of human beings. To accurately predict these events, scientists must track how magnetic structures and plasma flows evolve globally, not just from the limited ecliptic view. Observations from vantage point out of the ecliptic would provide an overlook of the CME propagation in the ecliptic plane.

 

Past Efforts

Scientists have long recognized the importance of solar polar observations. The Ulysses mission, launched in 1990, was the first spacecraft to leave the ecliptic plane and sample the solar wind over the poles. Its in-situ instruments confirmed key properties of the fast solar wind but lacked imaging capability. More recently, the European Space Agency’s Solar Orbiter has been gradually moving out of the ecliptic plane and is expected to reach latitudes of around 34° in a few years. While this represents a remarkable progress, it still falls far short of the vantage needed for a true polar view.

A number of ambitious mission concepts have been proposed over the past decades, including the Solar Polar Imager (SPI), the POLAR Investigation of the Sun (POLARIS), the Solar Polar ORbit Telescope (SPORT), the Solaris mission, and the High Inclination Solar Mission (HISM). Some envisioned using advanced propulsion such as solar sails to reach high inclinations. Others relied on gravity assists to incrementally tilt their orbits. Each of these missions would carry both remote-sensing and in-situ instruments to image the Sun’s poles and measure key physical parameters above the poles.

 

The SPO Mission

The Solar Polar-orbit Observatory (SPO) is designed specifically to overcome the limitations of past and current missions. Scheduled for launch in January 2029, SPO will use a Jupiter gravity assist (JGA) to bend its trajectory out of the ecliptic plane. After several Earth flybys and a carefully planned encounter with Jupiter, the spacecraft will settle into a 1.5-year orbit with a perihelion of about 1 AU and an inclination of up to 75°. In its extended mission, SPO could climb to 80°, offering the most direct view of the poles ever achieved.

The 15-year lifetime of the mission (including an 8-year extended mission period) will allow it to cover both solar minimum and maximum, including the crucial period around 2035 when the next solar maximum and expected polar magnetic field reversal will occur. During the whole lifetime, SPO will repeatedly pass over both poles, with extended high-latitude observation windows lasting more than 1000 days.

The SPO mission aims at breakthroughs on the three scientific questions mentioned above. To meet its ambitious objectives, SPO will carry a suite of several remote-sensing and in-situ instruments. Together, they will provide a comprehensive view of the Sun’s poles. The remote-sensing instruments include the Magnetic and Helioseismic Imager (MHI) to measure magnetic fields and plasma flows at the surface, the Extreme Ultraviolet Telescope (EUT) and the X-ray Imaging Telescope (XIT) to capture dynamic events in the solar upper atmosphere, the VISible-light CORonagraph (VISCOR) and the Very Large Angle CORonagraph (VLACOR) to track the solar corona and solar wind streams out to 45 solar radii (at 1 AU). The in-situ package includes a magnetometer and particle detectors to sample the solar wind and interplanetary magnetic field directly. By combining these observations, SPO will not only capture images of the poles for the first time but also connect them to the flows of plasma and magnetic energy that shape the heliosphere.

SPO will not operate in isolation. It is expected to work in concert with a growing fleet of solar missions. These include the STEREO Mission, the Hinode satellite, the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO), the Interface Region Imaging Spectrograph (IRIS), the Advanced Space-based Solar Observatory (ASO-S), the Solar Orbiter, the Aditya-L1 mission, the PUNCH mission, as well as the upcoming L5 missions (e.g., ESA’s Vigil mission and China’s LAVSO mission). Together, these assets will form an unprecedented observational network. SPO’s polar vantage will provide the missing piece, enabling nearly global 4π coverage of the Sun for the first time in human history.

 

Looking Ahead

The Sun remains our closest star, yet in many ways it is still a mystery. With SPO, scientists are poised to unlock some of its deepest secrets. The solar polar regions, once hidden from view, will finally come into focus, reshaping our understanding of the star that sustains life on Earth.

The implications of SPO extend far beyond academic curiosity. A deeper understanding of the solar dynamo could improve predictions of the solar cycle, which in turn affect space weather forecasts. Insights into the fast solar wind will enhance our ability to model the heliospheric environment, critical for spacecraft design and astronaut safety. Most importantly, better monitoring of space weather events could help protect modern technological infrastructure — from navigation and communications satellites to aviation and terrestrial power systems.

 

See the article:

Probing Solar Polar Regions https://www.cjss.ac.cn/cn/article/doi/10.11728/cjss2025.04.2025-0054

Northern Lights feature in today’s weather report… from a rogue planet




Trinity College Dublin
SIMP-0136 artist's impression 

image: 

An artistic impression of SIMP-0136.

view more 

Credit: Dr Evert Nasedkin





Strong Northern Lights-like activity is the standout feature of today’s weather report, which is coming at you from a strange, extrasolar world, instead of a standard TV studio. That is thanks to astronomers from Trinity College Dublin, who used the NASA/ESA/CSA James Webb Space Telescope to take a close look at the weather of a toasty nearby rogue planet, SIMP-0136.

The exquisite sensitivity of the instruments on board the space-based telescope enabled the team to see minute changes in brightness of the planet as it rotated, which were used to track changes in temperature, cloud cover and chemistry. 

Surprisingly, these observations also illuminated SIMP-0136’s strong auroral activity, similar to the Northern Lights here on Earth or the powerful aurora on Jupiter, which heat up its upper atmosphere.

“These are some of the most precise measurements of the atmosphere of any extra-solar object to date, and the first time that changes in the atmospheric properties have been directly measured,” said Dr Evert Nasedkin, a Postdoctoral Fellow in Trinity College Dublin’s School of Physics, who is the lead author of the research article just published in leading international journal, Astronomy & Astrophysics. 

“And at over 1,500 °C, SIMP-0136 makes this summer’s heat wave look mild,” he continued. “The precise observations we made meant we could accurately record temperature changes smaller than 5 °C. These changes in temperature were related to subtle changes in the chemical composition of this free-floating planet, which is suggestive of storms – similar to Jupiter’s Great Red Spot – rotating into view.”

Another surprise finding was the lack of variability of the clouds on SIMP-0136. One might expect changes in the cloud coverage to lead to changes in the atmosphere, similar to observing patches of clouds and blue sky here on Earth. Instead, the team found that the cloud coverage was constant over the surface of SIMP-0136. At the temperatures of SIMP-0136 these clouds are unlike those on earth, instead composed of silicate grains, similar to sand on a beach. 

This is the first publication from the new ‘Exo-Aimsir’ group led by Prof. Johanna Vos in Trinity’s School of Physics, and includes contributions from all the group members, including PhD candidates Merle Schrader, Madeline Lam and Cian O’Toole.

These data were initially published by a similar team led by Allison McCarthy at Boston University, but the new analysis has revealed more details about the atmosphere. 

“Different wavelengths of light are related to different atmospheric features. Similar to observing the changes in colour over the surface of the earth, the changes in the colour of SIMP-0136 are driven by changes in the atmospheric properties,” added Dr. Nasedkin. “So by using cutting-edge models, we could infer the temperature of the atmosphere, the chemical composition, and the position of the clouds.” 

Prof. Vos said: “This work is exciting because it shows that by applying our state-of-the-art modelling techniques to cutting-edge datasets from JWST, we can begin to piece together the processes that drive weather in worlds beyond our solar system. Understanding these weather processes will be crucial as we continue to discover and characterise exoplanets in the future.”

“While for now these types of spectroscopic variability observations are limited to isolated brown dwarfs, like this one, future observations with the Extremely Large Telescope and eventually the Habitable Worlds Observatory will enable the study of the atmospheric dynamics of exoplanets, from Jupiter-like gas giants to rocky worlds.”


Rotation of SIMP-0136 [VIDEO] 

On the right we see the changes in brightness observed during a single rotation period as observed with the NIRSpec/PRISM instrument on board the James Webb Space Telescope. These small changes in the brightness are the key to understanding the different physical processes that cause the variability, including changes in the temperature and heating from an aurora.

Credit

Dr Evert Nasedkin.



Framatome and ENEA aim to power Moon settlements


France's Framatome and the Italian Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Development, ENEA, are to explore advanced technological solutions for nuclear reactors to power future settlements on the Moon.
 
(Image: ENEA)

The memorandum of understanding covers three areas: studies regarding the fuel required for the reactor, with a view to ensuring both efficiency and safety; the development of new materials capable of withstanding the extreme conditions in space; and the use of additive manufacturing for reactor components.

Framatome said that "with the equivalent of 14 Earth-days of darkness each lunar night and temperatures of -130°C on the lunar surface, nuclear power will give us the means to stay for extended periods in space by providing a a safe, reliable long-lasting source of energy".

Grégoire Lambert, Vice President of Framatome Space, said: "The overall success of such developments will require different European competencies; we are happy to be part of the adventure."

Alessandro Dodaro, Director of ENEA's Nuclear Department, said: "Pooling and integrating our expertise together with Framatome is a stepping stone for increasing the international outreach of our activities on surface nuclear reactors, which is a precondition for success in such a complex technological endeavour. Furthermore, the collaboration will enable the development of even more competitive technical solutions so to push further the industrial maturity of the sector."

There are a number of different projects looking at using nuclear technology to power future infrastructure and settlements on the Moon, with Framatome saying: "This agreement marks an essential stage in space exploration and the sustainable use of lunar resources. Increasing the technological maturity of nuclear reactors for surface applications will widen Europe's portfolio of knowledge and capabilities, a vital asset in the race to return of humans to the Moon and in preparing for future voyages to Mars."

Sunday, March 23, 2025

Chinese electric car maker BYD aims for Europe boost


By AFP
March 20, 2025


BYD plans to launch its small format Seagull, to be renamed the Dolphin Surf in Europe around the middle of the year - Copyright AFP Philip FONG

Chinese carmaker BYD on Thursday vowed to conquer Europe with a new compact electric model and super-fast charging capability to rival continental brands.

“You will see, starting from March or April, our registration numbers will jump” in Europe, company vice-president Stella Li told AFP in an interview at a showroom in Paris.

“This year, BYD sales in the whole of Europe will start increasing.”

The group has launched major advertising campaigns including sponsorship of last year’s European Championships in football and has opened numerous new showrooms across the continent.

It plans to launch its small format Seagull, to be renamed the Dolphin Surf in Europe — a rival to the Renault 5 and Citroen C3 — around the middle of the year, Li said.

In China this week it unveiled a new charging system that it says will allow drivers 470 kilometres (nearly 300 miles) of battery life after charging for just five minutes — four times faster than the best systems currently on the market.

“It is really as fast as refuelling a petrol car,” Li said. “We are… preparing to bring this kind of cutting-edge technology to Europe in the next few years.”

BYD said it doubled its exports in the first two months of 2025 from a year earlier, to 130,000 vehicles. It sold 4.2 million worldwide in 2024, making it the globe’s sixth-biggest car firm.

The European Union has imposed a 17-percent tariff on Chinese electric vehicles to make up for Chinese state subsidies.

EU restrictions “will not change BYD’s plan because BYD is like a long-term player”, Li insisted.

EU authorities are also reportedly investigating BYD’s first European factory, in Hungary, where electric car production is scheduled to start late this year.

“We will be very transparent, very open, working with anybody who wants to do an investigation,” Li said.

EU tariffs not a deterrent, says Chinese EV maker XPeng



By AFP
March 21, 2025


An Xpeng G6 electric car at the opening of their second flagship store in Hong Kong on March 21, 2025 - Copyright AFP Annabelle Gordon

Chinese electric vehicle maker XPeng said Friday that European Union tariffs on EVs made in China have had a “large economic impact” but will not deter the firm’s plans to tap European markets.

Brussels decided to impose tariffs in October of up to 35.3 percent on imports of Chinese electric cars, citing alleged subsidies that give them an unfair advantage over European rivals.

The tariffs are “something we have to deal with… it’s a large economic impact,” XPeng vice chairman and president Brian Gu said at the opening of a Hong Kong store.

The Guangzhou-headquartered firm said last month that it aimed to double its presence to 60 countries and regions this year — part of a years-long globalisation trend in the Chinese EV sector.

The tariffs are “not deterring us from tackling the European opportunity”, Gu told AFP, adding “we still think it’s a very important market”.

“Being local is the way to mitigate a lot of these tariffs and protectionism,” he said.

Following years of generous support from Beijing, China’s EV manufacturers have intensified their domestic competition and are eager to gain an edge via exports and innovations.

Chinese EV giant BYD saw a boost to its shares on Tuesday after unveiling new battery technology that it says can charge a vehicle in the same time it takes to fill up a petrol car.

Self-driving technology — commonly divided into five tiers, with L5 being full automation with no need for human drivers — is also a key battleground for Chinese carmakers.

The technology is “moving very rapidly”, fuelled by more powerful chips and artificial intelligence advancements, Gu said, adding that L4 vehicles could enter mass production next year.

Meanwhile, the United States had maintained its 100 percent tariff on China-made EVs and in January finalised a rule that effectively barred Chinese technology from its cars.

XPeng entered the Hong Kong market in April 2024 and has faced stiff competition from Chinese rivals and established names such as Tesla.

There were just shy of 500 XPeng vehicles registered for the first time in Hong Kong last year, behind other Chinese brands such as SAIC’s Maxus and Geely’s Zeekr, official figures show.

At its Friday store opening, the company said it will bring its luxury seven-seater X9 to Hong Kong.

Monday, October 21, 2024

Water Protectors Use Novel Legal Tactic to Challenge the Dakota Access Pipeline

October 21, 2024

This story was originally published by Barn Raiser, your independent source for rural and small town news.

“No one wants to have oil in their water”— Natali Segovia, Water Protector Legal Collective

It’s about the water.

I’m returning to Mni Sose, the Missouri River, eight years after the saga of Standing Rock, when thousands of Water Protectors came to stop the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) from crossing under the river. In August 2016, I went to the river, summoned by Ladonna Brave Buffalo, Debra White Plume and others, both in this world and who have passed. I came for the water, because being a Water Protector is about life. Try drinking oil.

The cases grind on. Prosecutors have charged more than 800 people with crimes during the 11 months between the establishment of the first encampment, Sacred Stone, in April 2016, and the eviction of Oceti Sakowin Camp in February 2017. Some have had their charges reduced or dismissed. Others have been jailed as felons. North Dakota is still seeking to get the U.S. government to pay for the $38 million the state expended on police forces.

In November 2023 in Bismarck, federal regulators held their first public hearing on the draft of the court-ordered Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), yet in May, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers announced a final statement would not be ready until 2025. Just to say it again: the federally required EIS is still being reviewed seven years after the pipeline was installed under Lake Oahe and began operating. What’s more, the draft statement was developed by a company, Environmental Resources Management, which has ties to the petroleum industry. Meanwhile, DAPL continues to operate without the proper permits. That’s a bit backwards.

(Natural Resources Defense Council)

The legal system is not a fast one, and it’s backed up with all sorts of stuff, including the 500,000 pages of documents recently produced under seal—meaning they cannot be disclosed to the public—by Energy Transfer (ET), DAPL’s owner.

On August 28, Standing Rock Tribal Chairwoman Janet Alkire sent a letter calling on the Army Corps of Engineers to reopen public comment on the draft EIS, in light of a new document that came to light.

The story of how this document was uncovered is an interesting one. In 2017, ET filed a lawsuit against Greenpeace, the international environmental organization, for its participation in the opposition to the pipeline. ET is charging Greenpeace with a staggering $300 million in damages for “defamation” of the company.

How do you defame an oil pipeline company? You say mean things about them.

ET’s case against Greenpeace is part of a strategy known as a SLAPP suit, or strategic lawsuit against public participation, used by large corporations to censor, bully and push their critics toward bankruptcy with spiraling legal costs. But in a turn of events, Greenpeace is now trying new legal means to upend ET’s SLAPP suit, which could spell good things for nonprofits and activists whose dissent has been silenced by these suits.

As an international organization, Greenpeace is looking to use anti-SLAPP laws passed in April by the European Union that protect organizations based in the EU from SLAPP lawsuits outside the EU. In July, Greenpeace did just that, filing a countersuit against ET in a Dutch court to recover damages and costs related to the SLAPP suit, putting the legal theory to its first test. (In recent years, more than 30 states in the U.S. have adopted or amended anti-SLAPP laws.)

This spring the Water Protector Legal Collective raised the alarm on documents filed publicly as part of ET’s SLAPP lawsuit. One of them was a January 16 report, prepared for Greenpeace by an engineering firm, Exponent, that “determined there was a ‘relatively high’ probability that during [ET’s] drilling under the Missouri River at the Lake Oahe crossing, ‘1.4 million gallons of drilling fluids’ were lost in 700 events ending up in Lake Oahe.” That’s a lot of drilling fluid ending up in the Missouri River—water that recharges an aquifer providing drinking water to cities and towns along the river. Energy Transfer appears to have failed to report these spills to the federal agency that enforces pipeline construction

It’s going to be a problem for us all.

Now, what’s in drilling fluid? That’s the stuff that keeps the drill lubricated when it’s drilling deep under a river. The recipe is proprietary, but it is supposed to be basically bentonite, a clay-like substance.

The problem is that ET was already convicted of lacing drilling fluid with toxins. In 2022, Energy Transfer was federally debarred by the Environmental Protection Agency due to 48 criminal convictions in Pennsylvania for concealment and failure to report drilling fluid leaks and use of unapproved toxic additives resulting in water contamination at 21 sites during its construction of the Mariner East II, Rover and Revolution pipelines in 2017. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission also sought a penalty from ET and its Rover Pipeline LLC of $40 million for releasing 2 million gallons of drilling fluid containing toxic diesel fuel under the Tuscarawas River in Ohio in 2017. And that’s only the beginning.

The other documents produced in ET’s lawsuit against Greenpeace remain under seal—which means that even despite their highly public litigation efforts, ET is still maintaining its practice of concealing potentially damaging information. But that could change. On September 17, the Water Protector Legal Collective, which filed a motion this summer to intervene as a non-party in the ongoing legal battle between Greenpeace and ET, asked a North Dakota judge to lift a protective order that has guarded ET’s confidential documents related to pipeline safety and desecration of cultural sites. In the coming weeks, the judge could compel release of evidence relating to the spills of drilling fluid during the construction and operation of DAPL, along with a deposition of ET’s CEO Kelcy Warren, who is a close ally of Donald Trump.

The question for North Dakota is: Should you trust oil companies?

There’s a problem that most folks can see. North Dakota has 18 major petroleum pipelines and 9 major natural gas pipelines, which amounts to nearly 30,000 miles of pipeline, enough pipe to cross the state 88 times. A carbon pipeline proposed by Summit Carbon Solutions would add 333 more miles.

Who checks on pipeline safety? That’s the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), the federal agency in charge, matched with some state inspectors. In 2023, PHMSA was 40 short of the required 247 pipeline inspectors on the job. There are at least 2.6 million miles of pipeline in the United States, so those folks are stretched thin. PHMSA has not yet written regulations for hydrogen and carbon dioxide pipelines, but there are hundreds of miles under construction or installed alreadyWhat kind of smart guys allow projects to proceed without any safeguards or regulations?

Then there are the state inspectors, or lack thereof. In North Dakota, online advertisements both offer services and seek more pipeline inspectors. One ad: “Looking for a fast pipeline inspection in North Dakota? FairLifts can help arrange a timely pipeline inspection and other helicopter services for you…”

Another issue: Who gets to ask oil companies about their pipelines? In one hearing, ET argued that it was not required to report loss of drilling fluids or other accidents to PHMSA while a pipeline is under construction. That’s a convenient argument—except it’s incorrect.

The lack of public knowledge about pipeline leaks, spills and other cases of groundwater degradation only incentivizes energy companies to criminally hide their messes. Part of that is a result of the state changing the designations of spill reporting. In 2019, the Associated Press reported that North Dakota’s Health Department logged more than 8,000 “reported releases” over the span of five years but did not make public updates on the severity of those spills or their cleanup status.

In 2014, 29 million gallons of oil-contaminated “produced water”—a waste product of hydraulic fracturing—was released into the environment by Summit Midstream Partners (no relation to Summit Carbon Solutions mentioned above). And in 2021, the U.S. Department of Justice fined the company $l5 million. As the DOJ reported, more than 700,000 barrels were discharged thereby contaminating Blacktail Creek and nearby land and groundwater, including 30 miles of tributaries of the Missouri River. The spill continued for five months before it was contained and reported as required by the Clean Water Act. By law, the federal fines in this case will go to the Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund used to respond and clean up future oil spills.

In March 2014, the Mid-Valley Pipeline, owned by Energy Transfer Partners, spilled 21,000 gallons of crude into the environment, including Ohio’s Oak Glen Nature Preserve. (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency)

“Summit gave misleading and incomplete statements to the government about the duration and size of the spill,” said Assistant Attorney General Todd Kim of the DOJ’s Environment and Natural Resources Division, after Summit pleaded guilty in 2021. “Through the civil and criminal cases, Summit is being held responsible for its misconduct and must implement more rigorous environmental management to prevent and detect future spills as a condition of probation.” That’s just one company.

There’s definitely a disconnect in North Dakota regulations. Fundamentally, the question, asked by Natali Segovia, executive director of the Water Protector Legal Collective, remains for us all:

“Who is looking out for the health of the river, the fish and the 12 million people who live from Missouri River Water, including, 891 irrigation federal, state and tribal intakes from the Missouri? We cannot sit idly by and watch environmental regulations be rendered meaningless. They must count for something.”

It’s eight years after the Dakota Access Pipeline resistance at the river. The Standing Rock tribe is still seeking to close down the pipeline, the Environmental Impact Statement is in draft form and oil still runs North Dakota.

We might need more Water Protectors. You can’t drink oil.


Winona LaDuke


Winona LaDuke is a rural development economist working on issues of economic, food, and energy sovereignty. She lives and works on the White Earth reservation in northern Minnesota, and leads several organizations including Honor the Earth, Anishinaabe Agriculture Institute, Akiing, and Winona’s Hemp. These organizations develop and model cultural-based sustainable development strategies utilizing renewable energy and sustainable food systems. She is an international thought leader in the areas of climate justice, renewable energy, and environmental justice. She is also a leader in the work of protecting Indigenous plants and heritage foods from patenting and genetic engineering. She has authored six books including; Recovering the Sacred, All our Relations, Last Standing Woman, and her newest work, The Winona LaDuke Chronicles.

Sunday, December 17, 2023


Jeff Bezos says humans will live in massive space stations before settling on other planets, once again veering away from Elon Musk's Mars ambitions

Lloyd Lee
Thu, December 14, 2023 

Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk both have ambitions of space colonization.

But the billionaires disagree on how exactly that future will play out.

Bezos said in an interview that "planetary surfaces" are too small for mass human colonization.

Jeff Bezos said in a recent interview that he hopes for a distant future in which "a trillion" humans will inhabit the solar system, but the only way to get there is with massive space stations.

The Amazon and Blue Origin founder said on the Lex Fridman podcast published Thursday that a trillion humans would mean there could be a "thousand Mozarts and a thousand Einsteins" at any given point — a vision he previously shared in a 2018 interview with Mathias Döpfner, CEO of Business Insider's parent company Axel Springer.

Our solar system has enough resources to support a civilization that large, Bezos said, but people won't be inhabiting other planets.

"The only way to get to that vision is with giant space stations, he said. "The planetary surfaces are just way too small unless you turn them into giant space stations."

Bezos said that humans will take resources from planets or the moon to support life on space colonies that resemble cylindrical space stations envisioned by the late physicist Gerard Kitchen O'Neill.

"They have a lot of advantages over planetary surfaces. You can spin them to get normal earth gravity. You can put them where you want them," he said of O'Neill-style colonies, adding that most people are going to want to live near Earth anyway.

Bezos's space colony agenda is notable in that it differs from his main competitor, SpaceX founder Elon Musk.

Bezos doesn't explicitly mention Musk in his answer to Fridman, but the two billionaires have butted heads in the past over what the future of space colonization will look like.

Musk has repeatedly spoken about his ambitions to colonize Mars, claiming that he wants to start building human settlements as soon as 2050.

SpaceX also has plans to help NASA send humans to the moon for the first time in 1972, but its colonization goals are mostly focused on Mars.

Bezos on the other hand has set his target on the moon, unveiling the giant Blue Moon lunar lander concept in 2019 that will help humans get there. He also has previously spoken about O'Neill-style space cylinders that can maintain a good climate all year long.

As the two battle over colonization, Musk apparently longs for a competitive space race, saying that he wished Bezos "would get out of his hot tub and yacht" and focus more on Blue Origin, according to his biographer Walter Isaacson.

Spokespersons for Blue Origin and SpaceX did not respond to a request for comment sent outside of working hours.

Experts previously told Business Insider about the scientific and ethical dilemmas that lie in both billionaires' grandiose plans of space colonization, including the problems with gravity and space's impact on the human immune system. But that doesn't mean their efforts are worthless.

"As a species, we've got to do this. We're going to crucify this planet sooner or later. So you might as well die going to Mars," Kevin Moffat, an associate professor at the University of Warwick who specializes in human physiology, told BI.

Bezos told Fridman that, in the future, humans will be able to choose to go back and forth between space stations and Earth, and that space colonization is ultimately a means to preserve the planet.

"We've sent robotic probes to all the planets," he said. "We know that this is the good one."

Jeff Bezos says the main reason he left Amazon was to focus on Blue Origin

Kwan Wei Kevin Tan
Thu, December 14, 2023

  • Jeff Bezos says he gave up his post as Amazon CEO because he wanted to focus on Blue Origin.

  • Bezos founded the rocket company back in 2000.

  • He told podcaster Lex Fridman that most of his time is now spent on Blue Origin.

It's been two years since Jeff Bezos stepped down as Amazon's CEO. In that time, it appears he's kept himself busy with real estate acquisitions and getting swole.

But the billionaire says his departure from the tech company was because he wanted to focus on his rocket company, Blue Origin.

"I've turned the CEO role over, and the primary reason I did that is so that I could spend time on Blue Origin, adding some energy, some sense of urgency," Bezos said on the latest episode of the "Lex Fridman Podcast," which went live on Thursday.

Bezos founded Amazon back in 1994. He stepped down as CEO in July 2021 but retained his position as the company's executive chairman.

The move, according to Bezos, had to be made because the rocket company needed to move faster. Bezos told Fridman that he wouldn't have the bandwidth to manage Blue Origin if he was still running Amazon.

"When I was the CEO of Amazon, my point of view on this is, 'If I'm the CEO of a publicly traded company, it's going to get my full attention.' And it's just how I think about things," Bezos said earlier in the podcast.

"It was very important to me. I felt I had an obligation to all the stakeholders at Amazon to do that," he continued,

Bezos now says he's spending most of his time at Blue Origin and has "never worked harder."

"I am working so hard, and I'm mostly enjoying it, but there are also some very painful days," Bezos told Fridman about his current workdays after stepping down as Amazon's CEO.

"Most of my time is spent on Blue Origin and I'm so deeply involved here now for the last couple of years," Bezos told Fridman. "And in the big, I love it, and the small, there's all the frustrations that come along with everything."

Blue Origin, which was founded by Bezos in 2000, has been competing against rivals such as Elon Musk's SpaceX and Richard Branson's Virgin Galactic. The company has developed three space vehicles thus far — the New ShepardNew Glenn, and Blue Moon.

On Tuesday, Blue Origin said it was looking to launch the New Shepard rocket into Space next week. The rocket had been grounded since September 2022 after a mid-flight failure occurred during a mission.

Representatives for Blue Origin and Amazon did not immediately respond to requests for comment from Business Insider sent outside regular business hours.



Jeff Bezos is using his Amazon lessons to boost Blue Origin as it chases Elon Musk’s SpaceX—and courting controversy along the way

Steve Mollman
Fri, December 15, 2023 



Jeff Bezos wants his space cargo and tourism venture Blue Origin to move faster—much faster—as Elon Musk’s SpaceX notches one win after another.

The space rivalry between the two billionaires has been well documented. But in a long interview with the Lex Fridman Podcast posted Thursday, the Amazon founder struck a diplomatic note, acknowledging that if Musk were not a “capable leader,” building SpaceX and Tesla would be “impossible.”

Instead, Bezos spoke more about his own leadership approach at Blue Origin, saying that the “primary reason” he resigned a few years ago as CEO at Amazon—where he’s now executive chairman—was to add “some sense of urgency” to the space business he founded 23 years ago.

One way Bezos intends to accelerate Blue Origin is to speed up decision making. Whereas Amazon’s goal is to be “the world's most customer-obsessed company," he said, Blue Origin is “going to become the world’s most decisive company.”
Amazon lessons for Blue Origin

To get there, he’ll apply lessons he learned while leading Amazon for decades. Bezos described for instance the difference between two-way-door decisions and one-way-door decisions. The latter are “irreversible” and “should be elevated up to the senior executives, who should slow them down and make sure the right thing is being done.”

By way of example, he said, Blue Origin changing its mind about which propellants to use in a space vehicle’s different stages “would be a very big setback, so that’s the kind of decision you scrutinize very, very carefully.”

But mostly companies encounter two-way-door decisions, Bezos said, where if it turns out to be the wrong choice, “you can come back in and pick another door.” These decisions should be made quickly by individuals or “very small teams deep in the organization…in the full understanding that you can always change your mind.”

He’s also applying lessons learned about two “really bad” ways to reach an agreement at a company. One is compromise, where disagreeing parties settle on something that isn’t true in order to move on. For example, if they disagree on how high the ceiling is, he said, with one saying it’s 12 feet high and the other saying it’s 11, they might compromise with 11.5 feet—instead of using a tape measure to determine the actual truth.

The other mistake, which happens all the time, Bezos said, is to resolve the disagreement by “just who’s more stubborn.”

“They just have a war of attrition,” he said, “and whichever one gets exhausted first capitulates to the other one. Again, you haven't arrived at truth, and this is very demoralizing.”

At Blue Origin, Bezos tells his team to “never get to a point where you are resolving something by who gets exhausted first. Escalate that. I'll help you make the decision.”
Launching controversy

But Bezos’s proximity to both Amazon and Blue Origin has led to controversy. A notable example is with Amazon’s Project Kuiper, which intends to challenge SpaceX’s well-established Starlink by also offering broadband internet access around the globe via satellites in low Earth orbit.

Last year, Amazon announced the launch partners for getting its planned 3,000-plus Kuiper satellites into orbit. While it contracted Bezos’s own Blue Origin—along with Europe’s Arianespace and United Launch Alliance, a joint venture of Boeing and Lockheed Martin—for up to 83 launches, it notably snubbed Musk’s SpaceX.

That prompted Amazon investors to sue the company’s leadership, alleging they “excluded the most obvious and affordable launch provider, SpaceX, from its procurement process because of Bezos’s personal rivalry with Musk.” The investors also said there was a “glaring conflict of interest,” with Amazon funneling money to Blue Origin when Bezos owned the latter and was executive chairman of the former. This week, Amazon sought to have the lawsuit dismissed, 10 days after announcing an agreement with SpaceX for three launches of its Kuiper satellites.

“The claims in the shareholder lawsuit had no impact on our procurement plans for Project Kuiper, including our recently disclosed launch agreement with SpaceX,” an Amazon spokesperson told Fortune. “The claims in that suit are completely without merit, and we look forward to showing that through the legal process.”
SpaceX success

Either way, Amazon and Blue Origin have watched Musk’s space company race ahead in important areas.

In April 2021, NASA awarded SpaceX a sole contact worth $2.9 billion for its lunar landing system. Blue Origin, which had competed for what it thought would be two contracts, sued the space agency over the decision, but it lost the case later that year.

Meanwhile Amazon’s Project Kuiper is trying to catch up with Starlink but has a long way to go.

Starlink, which offers broadband service globally, including in remote areas, already has more than 5,000 satellites in operation. Its satellites can beam data to one another using more than 8,000 lasers across the constellation, making for a faster, more reliable service.

In contrast to this flurry of progress, Amazon launched two prototype satellites only in October, announcing this week that they had successfully used lasers to beam data between them.

In the meantime Starlink is racing ahead, with more than 2 million active users. Costco recently began selling Starlink receivers, and this week SpaceX received U.S. approval to test direct-to-cell calls via Starlink in partnership with T-Mobile.

This year, SpaceX has notched more than 90 successful launches of its Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy rockets, and it's become a juggernaut in the industry. It hit a near $180 billion valuation this week based on an ongoing secondary share sale, making it one of the world’s most valuable private companies.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com

Jeff Bezos says floating at zero gravity felt like a 'return to the womb'

AMAZING HE REMEMBERS FLOATING IN THE WOMB

Polly Thompson
Fri, December 15, 2023 


Jeff Bezos has spoken to podcaster Lex Fridman about what going to space feels like.


He said that reaching zero gravity felt like a "return to the womb."


Bezos first journeyed to space on one of his Blue Origin rockets in July 2021.

The sensation of floating in space at zero gravity felt like returning to the womb for Jeff Bezos.

The billionaire Amazon founder traveled to space in July 2021 as part of Blue Origin's first passenger spaceflight.

Alongside his brother Mark and two other passengers, Bezos floated in a weightless capsule at zero gravity for about three minutes before gravity began pulling it back to Earth.

He shared his feelings about the experience in the latest episode of the "Lex Fridman Podcast," which went live on Thursday.

"I'll tell you something very interesting: zero gravity feels very natural. I don't know if it's because it's like a return to the womb," he said.

"You just confirmed you're an alien," joked Fridman.

Bezos said that he wasn't at all nervous about the experience and that the whole crew was struck with the overview effect — the overwhelming feelings people experience when seeing Earth from space — while looking down at Earth.

"It was an incredible experience and we were laughing inside the capsule, and were not nervous," Bezos told Fridman.

"You see how fragile the Earth is. If you're not an environmentalist, it will make you one," he added.

During their two-hour interview, Bezos also discussed his vision for the future of humanity and told Fridman that he'd stepped down as Amazon CEO so that he could concentrate more on Blue Origin.

"Most of my time is spent on Blue Origin and I'm so deeply involved here now for the last couple of years," Bezos told Fridman.

The rocket company, which Bezos founded in 2000, has so far developed three space vehicles: the New Shepard, the New Glenn, and Blue Moon.

Blue Origin may try to launch the New Shepard again next week after more than 15 months of delays because of a mid-flight failure.

New

New